1. A systematic review of discrete choice experiments in stroke rehabilitation.
- Author
-
Jolliffe L, Christie LJ, Fearn N, Nohrenberg M, Liu R, Williams JF, Parsons MW, and Pearce AM
- Subjects
- Humans, Stroke Rehabilitation methods, Choice Behavior, Patient Preference
- Abstract
Objectives: Existing research qualitatively explores consumer preferences for stroke rehabilitation interventions. However, it remains unclear which intervention characteristics are most important to consumers, and how these preferences may influence uptake and participation. Discrete choice experiments (DCE) provide a unique way to quantitatively measure preferences for health and health care. This study aims to explore how DCEs have been used in stroke rehabilitation and to identify reported consumer preferences for rehabilitation interventions., Material and Methods: A systematic review of published stroke rehabilitation DCEs was completed (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021282578). Six databases (including CINAHL, MEDLINE, EconLIT) were searched from January 2000-March 2023. Data extracted included topic area, sample size, aim, attributes, design process, and preference outcomes. Descriptive and thematic analyses were conducted, and two methodological checklists applied to review quality., Results: Of 2,446 studies screened, five were eligible. Studies focused on exercise preference ( n = 3), the structure and delivery of community services ( n = 1), and self-management programs ( n = 1). All had small sample sizes (range 50-146) and were of moderate quality (average score of 77%). Results indicated people have strong preferences for one-to-one therapy (over group-based), light-moderate intensity of exercise, and delivery by qualified therapists (over volunteers)., Conclusions: Few DCEs have been conducted in stroke rehabilitation, suggesting consumer preferences could be more rigorously explored. Included studies were narrow in the scope of attributes included, limiting their application to practice and policy. Further research is needed to assess the impact of differing service delivery models on uptake and participation.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF