Search

Eptesicus Rafinesque, 1820 is widely distributed in the Old and New World (26 species), and Histiotus Gervais, 1856 is a South American endemic (11 species). Molecular phylogenies have recovered Eptesicus (sensu lato) as polyphyletic, with New World Eptesicus and the sister genus Histiotus in a paraphyletic American clade sister to Old World Eptesicus. Based on these phylogenetic reconstructions, authors have treated Histiotus as either a subgenus of Eptesicus or restricted Eptesicus to the New World species, treating Histiotus as a full genus, and using the name Cnephaeus Kaup, 1829 at the generic rank to comprise Old World Eptesicus. Based on recently published molecular studies, and on novel qualitative and quantitative morphological comparisons of representatives of Histiotus and New and Old World Eptesicus, we provide evidence for restricting the name Eptesicus to the species E. fuscus (Palisot de Beauvois, 1796) and E. guadeloupensis Genoways & Baker, 1975, allocating the remaining New World species under a new genus, keeping Histiotus as a full genus, and raising Cnephaeus to generic rank to comprise all Old World taxa currently under Eptesicus. This arrangement resolves the paraphyly of New World Eptesicus, and promotes taxonomic stability for Histiotus, which is a well-established genus of easily recognizable Neotropical bats and treated separate from Eptesicus by most authorities.

Phyllostomids are locally abundant, ecologically diverse, and form rich assemblages. They also provide essential ecosystem services, which may change along the year in response to changes in bat abundances. Here we report on a phyllostomid assemblage studied at Reserva Biológica União (RBU), an Atlantic Forest area with outstanding diversity in southeastern Brazil. We assessed seasonal variation in diversity profiles for alpha and beta components, as well as in the abundance of the most common species. Spatial variation in phyllostomid diversity profiles and components was also assessed, using published information from three nearby sites. Based on a sample of 786 mist net captures and records from monitored roosts, the phyllostomid assemblage at RBU was found to include at least 19 species, two of which recognized as endangered at the national level (Lonchorhina aurita and Lonchophylla peracchii). The diversity profile for RBU was heavily influenced by common species and was one of the richest but less diverse in the region due to its uneven distribution. The diversity profiles suggested no seasonal differences in alpha diversity. Beta diversity profiles for spatial and seasonal analyses showed that samples behaved as subsets of a single assemblage, suggesting a relative homogeneity of resources in these dimensions. At the population level, however, some expected seasonal variation in abundance was confirmed (e.g., in Artibeus spp. and in Carollia perspicillata). The high relative frequency of Sturnira tildae at RBUdifferentiated this site, thus reinforcing its conservation importance. Morcegos filostomídeos são localmente abundantes, ecologicamente diversos, e formam ricas assembleias. Eles fornecem serviços ecossistêmicos essenciais, cuja disponibilidade pode mudar ao longo do ano por flutuações na sua abundância. Nos reportamos aqui a uma assembleia de filostomídeos estudada na Reserva Biológica União (RBU), uma área com grande diversidade no sudeste do Brasil. Apresentamos uma avaliação da variação sazonal de perfis de diversidade para os componentes alfa e beta, assim como da abundância das espécies mais comuns. Variação espacial na riqueza e diversidade de filostomídeos também foi investigada a partir de dados publicados de três sítios próximos. Baseado em uma amostra de 786 capturas em redes de neblina e registros a partir do monitoramento de abrigos, a assembleia de filostomídeos da RBU inclui pelo menos 19 espécies, duas das quais reconhecidas nacionalmente como ameaçadas de extinção (Lonchorhina aurita e Lonchophylla peracchii). O perfil de diversidade da RBU mostrou-se fortemente influenciado pelas espécies mais comuns, sendo um dos mais ricos da região mas pouco diverso em função da distribuição pouco equitativa. Os perfis de diversidade alfa indicaram a ausência de diferenças sazonais. Os perfis de diversidade beta para análises espaciais e sazonais mostraram que as assembleias locais se comportam como subconjuntos de uma única assembleia, sugerindo uma relativa homogeneidade de recursos nessas dimensões. Em nível populacional, entretanto, variações sazonais já esperadas foram confirmadas (e.g., Artibeus spp. e C. perspicillata). A frequência elevada de Sturnira tildae na RBU diferencia esse site dos demais aqui analisados, reforçando sua importância para a conservação.

Ozotoceros bezoarticus (ZMB_MAM 2057) This specimen, represented by a skull, is identifiable as male due to the presence of antlers (Fig. 8 b). The skull is complete, but the right M1 is missing and the premaxillae are broken (MTR = 67.4 mm; MDL = 72.12 mm; BB = 63.65 mm; NL = 81.6 mm). The writing on the skull reads ��� San Paulo Sello.��� Typical of open grasslands, this species probably has been extirpated in S��o Paulo (Jackson 1987; Duarte & Vogliotti 2010). In this state, Natterer collected a male in Itarar�� (Pelzeln 1883) and Carvalho recoded the species in ��guas de Santa B��rbara (Carvalho 1980). The locality is probably correct because the only area in S��o Paulo that Sellow visited and could have collected a specimen of O. bezoarticus, due to the presence of open grasslands (Borgonovi & Chiarini 1965), is in the vicinity Itarar��., Published as part of Garbino, Guilherme S. T. & Nogueira, Marcelo R., 2017, On the mammals collected by Friedrich Sellow in Brazil and Uruguay (1814 ��� 1831), with special reference to the types and their provenance, pp. 172-190 in Zootaxa 4221 (2) on page 184, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.248623, {"references":["Jackson J. E. (1987) Ozotoceros bezoarticus. Mammalian Species, 295, 1 - 5.","Duarte, J. M. B. & Vogliotti, A. (2010) Ozotoceros bezoarticus (Linnaeus, 1758). In: Bressan, P. M., Kierulff, M. C. M. & Sugieda, A. M. (Eds.), Fauna ameacada de extincao no estado de Sao Paulo: Vertebrados. Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, Sao Paulo, pp. 1 - 69.","Pelzeln A. von (1883) Brasilische Saugethiere: Resultate von Johann Natterer's Reisen in den Jahren 1817 bis 1835. Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Osterreich in Wien, 33 (Suppl.), 1 - 140.","Carvalho, C. T. (1980) Mamiferos dos parques e reservas de Sao Paulo. Silvicultura, Sao Paulo, 13 / 14, 49 - 72.","Borgonovi, M. & Chiarini, J. V. (1965) Cobertura vegetal do Estado de Sao Paulo: I-Levantamento por fotointerpretacao das areas cobertas com cerrado, cerradao e campo, em 1962. Bragantia, 24, 159 - 172."]}

Mus vulpinus Brants, 1827 (ZMB_MAM 1681) The material consists of a well-preserved skin (Fig. 4 c), a fragmented cranium and mandible, with condylar, angular, and coronoid processes missing. Lichtenstein (1830) stated that Sellow collected the type specimen (ZMB _MAM 1681) on the banks of Rio Uruguay, not specifying the country. The label and the Generalkatalog read ��� Uruguay ��� as the collecting locality. Hershkovitz (1955) and Cerqueira (1975) affirm that it is not possible to restrict the type locality to any place other than the banks of Rio Uruguay, Uruguay, and western Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Nevertheless, taking into account the marshy habitat in which the species occurs, Cerqueira (1975) proposed restricting the type locality to Itaqui, Brazil, near the Uruguayan border, a decision subsequently followed by Gon��alves et al. (2015)., Published as part of Garbino, Guilherme S. T. & Nogueira, Marcelo R., 2017, On the mammals collected by Friedrich Sellow in Brazil and Uruguay (1814 ��� 1831), with special reference to the types and their provenance, pp. 172-190 in Zootaxa 4221 (2) on page 180, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.248623, {"references":["Brants, A. (1827) Het Geslacht der Muizen door Linnaeus opgesteld, Volgens de Tegenswoordige toestand der Wetenschap in Familien, Geslachten en Soorten verdeeld. Gedrukt ter Akademische Boekdrukkery, Berlin, xii + 190 pp, 1 plate.","Lichtenstein, H. (1830) Darstellung neuer oder wenig bekannter Saugethiere Abbildungen und Beschreibungen von funf und sechzig Arten und funtzig colorirten Steindrucktafeln nach den Originalen des Zoologischen Museum der Universitat zu Berlin. C. G. Luderitz, Berlin, unpaginated text belonging to 50 plates. [Lichtenstein's Darstellungen was published in parts from 1827 to 1834].","Hershkovitz, P. (1955) South American marsh rats, genus Holochilus, with a summary of sigmodont rodents. Fieldiana: Zoology, 37, 639 - 673.","Cerqueira, R. (1975) Sobre a localidade tipo de Holochilus brasiliensis (Brants, 1827) (Rodentia, Cricetidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 35, 31 - 34.","Goncalves, P. R., Teta, P. & Bonvicino, C. R. (2015) Genus Holochilus Brandt, 1835. In: Patton, J. L., Pardinas U. F. J. & D'Elia, G. (Eds.), Mammals of South America, vol. 2, rodents. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 325 - 335."]}

Dasyprocta azarae Lichtenstein, 1823 (ZMB_MAM 1044, 1045) The two syntypes are from S��o Paulo. ZMB _MAM 1044 is an adult, mounted skin, with the skull inside (Fig 6). ZMB_MAM 1045���a flat skin, with skull���is a subadult, with the basioccipital���basisphenoid suture open and M3 partially erupted. For nomenclatural purposes, and acknowledging that pelage color is an important character for the taxonomy of dasyproctids (see Patton & Emmons 2015), we here designate specimen ZMB_MAM 1044, the most well preserved skin, as the lectotype. Lichtenstein described this agouti in his catalogue of the museum���s duplicates (Lichtenstein 1823:3). In the original publication, Lichtenstein stated that he based the name on Azara���s (1801) l���acouti, and gives a brief description, comparing it with Cavia Aguti (= Dasyprocta leporina). He also mentioned that the specimens came from S��o Paulo. Because the Generalkatalog, specimen labels, and Lichtenstein���s (1823) description all indicate that the specimens came from S��o Paulo, the type locality can be reliably assigned to this state. If a further restriction is warranted, we suggest restricting the type locality to between 49��20���W and 44��11���W, which encompasses the route traveled by Sellow in the state of S��o Paulo. The western portion of S��o Paulo remained relatively unexplored until the last decades of the 19th century., Published as part of Garbino, Guilherme S. T. & Nogueira, Marcelo R., 2017, On the mammals collected by Friedrich Sellow in Brazil and Uruguay (1814 ��� 1831), with special reference to the types and their provenance, pp. 172-190 in Zootaxa 4221 (2) on pages 180-181, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.248623, {"references":["Lichtenstein, H. (1823) Verzeichniss der Doubletten des Zoologischen Museums der Konigl. Universitat zu Berlin nebst Beschreibung vieler bisber unbekannter Arten von Saugethieren, Vogeln, Amhibien und Fischen. Commission bie T. Trautwein, Berlin, x + 118 pp.","Patton, J. L. & Emmons, L. H. (2015) Family Dasyproctidae Bonaparte, 1838. In: Patton, J. L., Pardinas U. F. J. & D'Elia, G. (Eds.), Mammals of South America, vol. 2, rodents. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 2279 - 2366."]}

Callicebus melanochir (ZMB_MAM 258) We examined a skin (no skull) of a Callicebus melanochir, identified as male. The label and the Generalkatalog read ��� Brasilien ��� as the source. Based on the restricted distribution of this species and on Sellow���s itinerary, we can safely assume that the specimen was collected in southeastern Bahia., Published as part of Garbino, Guilherme S. T. & Nogueira, Marcelo R., 2017, On the mammals collected by Friedrich Sellow in Brazil and Uruguay (1814 ��� 1831), with special reference to the types and their provenance, pp. 172-190 in Zootaxa 4221 (2) on page 182, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.248623

Mus tomentosus Lichtenstein, 1830 (ZMB_MAM 1699) Lichtenstein (1830), when describing Mus tomentosus (currently Kunsia tomensotus), affirmed that the type specimen (ZMB _MAM 1699, skin, skull) came from forested areas along the Rio Uruguay. The catalog entry and the specimen label read ��� Uruguay ��� as the locality (Fig. 5). Hershkovitz (1966:120) further restricted the type locality by stating: ���There is no good reason for believing that the type of Mus tomentosus was collected in any place other than the one given by Lichtenstein and I hereby restrict it to the Rio Uruguay in southeastern Brazil ���. It is plausible to assume that Kunsia tomentosus distribution is associated with the open and transitional woodland formations of South America (Bezerra et al. 2007). Therefore, the restriction made by Hershkovitz (1966), to a region covered in the 19th century by seasonal and humid forests (Fig. 1), is not likely to be the correct collecting type locality. Bezerra et al. (2007) and Ter��n et al. (2008) defined the distribution of K. tomentosus as the Cerrado of central and west���central Brazil; eastern, northeastern, and northwestern Bolivia; and southeastern Brazil, in the state of Minas Gerais. From these areas, Sellow collected in the open Cerrado of the state of Minas Gerais. Bezerra et al. (2007), Pardi��as et al. (2008) and Bezerra (2015) also acknowledge that the type locality, as currently understood, lies more than 1000 km from the nearest suitable habitat. Pardi��as et al. (2008) stated that the type locality may be incorrect and that the type specimen probably came from southeastern Brazil. Recent paleontological studies, however, have found osteological remains of K. tomentosus in Rio Grande do Sul, indicating that the species may have been recently extirpated from the area (Stutz et al. 2015). Due to these findings, we keep the type locality of K. tomentosus as Rio Uruguay, Rio Grande do Sul, and suggest that the species may still be present in Rio Grande do Sul., Published as part of Garbino, Guilherme S. T. & Nogueira, Marcelo R., 2017, On the mammals collected by Friedrich Sellow in Brazil and Uruguay (1814 ��� 1831), with special reference to the types and their provenance, pp. 172-190 in Zootaxa 4221 (2) on page 179, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.248623, {"references":["Lichtenstein, H. (1830) Darstellung neuer oder wenig bekannter Saugethiere Abbildungen und Beschreibungen von funf und sechzig Arten und funtzig colorirten Steindrucktafeln nach den Originalen des Zoologischen Museum der Universitat zu Berlin. C. G. Luderitz, Berlin, unpaginated text belonging to 50 plates. [Lichtenstein's Darstellungen was published in parts from 1827 to 1834].","Hershkovitz, P. (1966) South American swamp and fossorial rats of the scapteromyine group (Cricetinae, Muridae) with comments on the glans penis in murid taxonomy. Zeitschrift fur Saugetierkunde, 31, 81 - 149.","Bezerra, A. M. R., Carmignotto, A. P., Nunes, A. P. & Rodrigues, F. H. G. (2007) New data on the distribution, natural history and morphology of Kunsia tomentosus (Lichtenstein, 1830) (Rodentia: Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae). Zootaxa, 1505, 1 - 18.","Teran, M. F., Ayala, J. & Hurtado, J. C. (2008) Primer registro de Kunsia tomentosus (Rodentia: Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae) en el norte del departamento de La Paz, Bolivia. Mastozoologia Neotropical, 15 (1), 129 - 133.","Pardinas, U., D'Elia, G. & Teta, P. (2008) Una introduccion a los mayores sigmodontinos vivientes: revision de Kunsia Hershkovitz, 1966 y descripcion de un nuevo genero (Rodentia: Cricetidae). Arquivos do Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, 66 (3 - 4), 509 - 594.","Bezerra, A. M. R. (2015) Genus Kunsia Hershkovitz, 1966. In: Patton, J. L., Pardinas U. F. J. & D'Elia, G. (Eds.), Mammals of South America, vol. 2, rodents. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 228 - 231.","Stutz, N. S., Cherem, J. J., Hadler, P. & Pardinas, U. F. (2015) Roedores sigmodontineos (Rodentia: Cricetidae) do Holoceno do nordeste do estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Livro de Resumos do 8 ° Congresso Brasileiro de Mastozoologia, Joao Pessoa, 341 pp."]}

Mico argentatus (ZMB_MAM 284) and Saguinus niger (ZMB_MAM 289) According to specimen���s labels and the Generalkatalog, these two callitrichids were collected by Sellow. The Saguinus niger (ZMB _MAM 289, skin only) has ��� Par�� ��� as the locality (Fig. 7 d). The Mico argentatus (ZMB _MAM 284, skin only) label reads ���Brasilien��� (Fig. 7 c). These two taxa are restricted to the Amazonia of the Brazilian state of Par�� (Rylands and Mittermeier 2013) and more likely were collected by Sieber, who acquired specimens in that region for Hoffmannsegg (��vila-Pires 1967). ��vila-Pires (1967) reported on a similar discrepancy for specimens of the bristle-spined rat, Chaetomys subspinosus (e.g., ZMB _MAM 1300), an animal restricted to the Atlantic Forest of Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais, Esp��rito Santo, Bahia, and Sergipe, but whose specimen labels and catalogue entries read ��� Camet��,��� a locality in the Amazonia of Par��, northern Brazil, where Sieber made collections., Published as part of Garbino, Guilherme S. T. & Nogueira, Marcelo R., 2017, On the mammals collected by Friedrich Sellow in Brazil and Uruguay (1814 ��� 1831), with special reference to the types and their provenance, pp. 172-190 in Zootaxa 4221 (2) on page 182, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.248623, {"references":["Rylands, A. B. & Mittermeier, R. A. (2013) Family Callitrichidae (marmosets and tamarins). In: Mittermeier, R. A., Rylands, A. B. & Wilson, D. E. (Eds.), Handbook of the mammals of the world, vol. 3. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, pp. 262 - 346.","Avila-Pires, F. D. (1967) The type locality of Chaetomys subspinosus (Olfers, 1818) (Rodentia: Caviomorpha). Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 27 (2), 177 - 179."]}

Mus auritus Lichtenstein, 1830 (ZMB_MAM 1688) Specimen ZMB _MAM 1688 (skin, skull) (Fig. 4 a), here identified as Akodon sp., has a label that reads ��� typus von Calomys auritus Lichtenstein.��� Lichtenstein (1830) described Mus auritus (not Mus auritus Fischer, 1814) based on a skin and skull collected in Rio de Janeiro. Although the description and plates are sufficient to make the name available, we could not identify the material to the species level, therefore, we are unable to correctly allocate this type., Published as part of Garbino, Guilherme S. T. & Nogueira, Marcelo R., 2017, On the mammals collected by Friedrich Sellow in Brazil and Uruguay (1814 ��� 1831), with special reference to the types and their provenance, pp. 172-190 in Zootaxa 4221 (2) on page 178, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.248623, {"references":["Lichtenstein, H. (1830) Darstellung neuer oder wenig bekannter Saugethiere Abbildungen und Beschreibungen von funf und sechzig Arten und funtzig colorirten Steindrucktafeln nach den Originalen des Zoologischen Museum der Universitat zu Berlin. C. G. Luderitz, Berlin, unpaginated text belonging to 50 plates. [Lichtenstein's Darstellungen was published in parts from 1827 to 1834]."]}

Chiroderma villosum Peters, 1860 (ZMB_MAM 408) Peters (1860) described Chiroderma villosum based on two specimens: one female from Brazil (ZMB _MAM 408), and a skeleton of unknown provenance. The former specimen is a skin with the skull inside, but badly preserved; the skin color is faded, the inner pair of facial stripes are barely visible, and the only external measurement we were able to take was the forearm length, estimated in 47.9 mm (right forearm). The distance between upper canines was 6.37 mm. The skin around the lips had been retracted, so the teeth, up to M1 and m1, are visible, allowing us to identify the diagnostic parallel upper inner incisors (Fig. 2 b, d). Since the skeleton could not be located (Carter and Dolan 1978, Turni and Kock 2008; C. Funk pers. comm. 2016), and because Peters described pelage and cranial characters of the specimen, Turni and Kock (2008) designated ZMB _MAM 408 as the lectotype. The label on ZMB _MAM 408 reads ��� Sao Paulo Brasilien Sello���, but the catalogue, handwritten by Peters, mentions only Brazil (���Brasilia���), without any information on the collector (Fig. 3). In the original description of this taxon, Peters (1860:754) stated that Sellow supposedly collected the type and reported only Brazil as its source. Since there is not enough evidence to narrow the type locality of this widely distributed taxon, we suggest keeping it as Brazil, as adopted by most authors (e.g., Carter & Dolan 1978; Simmons 2005; Gardner 2008a). We also conclude, due to conflicting information (i.e., label vs. catalogue), that there is not enough evidence to affirm that the lectotype was collected by Sellow. Most of the Brazilian mammals deposited in the Museum f��r Naturkunde during the first decades of the 19th century were collected by Ignaz von Olfers in eastern Brazil, Friedrich Sieber in the state of Par��, Francisco Gomes in Bahia, and Sellow, also in eastern Brazil (��vila-Pires 1967). Thus, the lectotype could have come from any one of these collectors and the localities they visited., Published as part of Garbino, Guilherme S. T. & Nogueira, Marcelo R., 2017, On the mammals collected by Friedrich Sellow in Brazil and Uruguay (1814 ��� 1831), with special reference to the types and their provenance, pp. 172-190 in Zootaxa 4221 (2) on pages 176-177, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.248623, {"references":["Peters, W. (1860) Eine neue Gattung von Flederthieren, Chiroderma villosum, aus Brasilien. Monatsberichte der Koniglichen Preussische Akademie des Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1861, 747 - 755.","Carter, D. C. & Dolan, P. G. (1978) Catalogue of type specimens of Neotropical bats in selected European museums. Special Publications of the Museum of Texas Tech University, 15, 1 - 136.","Turni, H. & Kock, D. (2008) Type specimens of bats (Chiroptera: Mammalia) in the collections of the Museum fur Naturkunde, Berlin. Zootaxa, 1869, 1 - 82.","Simmons, N. B. (2005) Order Chiroptera. In: Wilson, D. E. & Reeder, D. M. (Eds.), Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference, vol. 2. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 312 - 529.","Avila-Pires, F. D. (1967) The type locality of Chaetomys subspinosus (Olfers, 1818) (Rodentia: Caviomorpha). Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 27 (2), 177 - 179."]}

Brachyteles arachnoides (ZMB_MAM 206) The specimen of the southern muriqui, Brachyteles arachonoides, is represented by only a flat skin. The material is the only primate collected by Sellow whose label bears a specific locality other than simply the state or country where it was collected. The label reads ���Ypanema,��� the same locality where Natterer also collected specimens of B. arachnoides (see Pelzeln 1883). In the absence of contrary evidence, we assume that this locality is correct., Published as part of Garbino, Guilherme S. T. & Nogueira, Marcelo R., 2017, On the mammals collected by Friedrich Sellow in Brazil and Uruguay (1814 ��� 1831), with special reference to the types and their provenance, pp. 172-190 in Zootaxa 4221 (2) on page 182, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.248623, {"references":["Pelzeln A. von (1883) Brasilische Saugethiere: Resultate von Johann Natterer's Reisen in den Jahren 1817 bis 1835. Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Osterreich in Wien, 33 (Suppl.), 1 - 140."]}

Blastocerus dichotomus (ZMB_MAM 2052) The species is represented by an adult male (MTR = 85.11 mm; MDL = 91.41 mm; BB = 76.09 mm); writing on the skull reads ��� San Paulo Sello��� (Fig. 8 a). This locality is probably incorrect, since the species occurred only in marshy habitats in western S��o Paulo, along the banks of the Rio Paran��, a region not visited by Sellow (Piovezan et al. 2010). The species also occurred in Brazil and Uruguay, along the banks of the Rio Uruguay (Piovezan et al. 2010), and it is more probable that this specimen came from these countries, near that river., Published as part of Garbino, Guilherme S. T. & Nogueira, Marcelo R., 2017, On the mammals collected by Friedrich Sellow in Brazil and Uruguay (1814 ��� 1831), with special reference to the types and their provenance, pp. 172-190 in Zootaxa 4221 (2) on page 183, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.248623, {"references":["Piovezan, U., Tiepolo, L. M., Tomas, W. M., Duarte, J. M. B., Varela, D. & Marinho-Filho, J. S. (2010) Marsh deer Blastocerus dichotomus (Illiger 1815). In: Duarte, J. M. B. & Gonzalez, S. S Gonzalez (Eds.), Neotropical Cervidology: Biology and Medicine of Latin American Deer. Funep / IUCN, Jaboticabal, pp. 66 - 76."]}

Mus leptosoma Brants, 1827 (ZMB_MAM 1184) When Desmarest (1817) described his ���silky spiny rat���, Echimys setosus, he only mentioned ���Am��rique��� as the locality. Lichtenstein (1820:192) described Loncheres myosuros from Bahia based on specimens collected by Freyreiss. Subsequently, Brants (1827:150), crediting Lichtenstein as the author of the taxon, described Mus leptosoma, stating that the species occurs in Bahia, and that the types are in the Berlin Museum. Later, Lichtenstein (1830) redescribed Mus leptosoma based on specimens collected by Freyreiss in Bahia and by Sellow in S��o Paulo. ZMB _MAM 1184 is clearly identifiable as Trinomys setosus (Fig. 4 d). Label information reads Sellow collected the specimen in S��o Paulo. ZMB _MAM 1184 is marked as the type of Loncheres myosuros and Mus leptosoma in the catalog, whereas specimen ZMB _MAM 1185, collected by Freyreiss in Bahia, is also a Trinomys setosus. We can assume that both specimens were used by Brants and Lichtenstein to describe Mus leptosoma, and thus are both syntypes of that taxon. Moojen (1948) considered the names Loncheres myosuros Lichtenstein, 1820 and Mus leptosoma Brants, 1827 as incertae sedis, but subsequent reports treated these two names as junior synonyms of Echimys setosus Desmarest (Iack-Ximenes 2005; Pess��a et al. 2015). We have considered the possibility that Mus leptosoma was composed of more than one species, but both syntypes, ZMB_MAM 1184 and ZMB_MAM 1185, have been confirmed as Trinomys setosus by us and other authors (Iack-Ximenes 2005). The species is known from Bahia, Esp��rito Santo, Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro. However, this taxon has not been found in the state of S��o Paulo, where Trinomys dimidiatus and T. iheringi occur. Therefore, we consider more plausible that the supposed provenance of specimen ZMB _MAM 1184 is erroneous., Published as part of Garbino, Guilherme S. T. & Nogueira, Marcelo R., 2017, On the mammals collected by Friedrich Sellow in Brazil and Uruguay (1814 ��� 1831), with special reference to the types and their provenance, pp. 172-190 in Zootaxa 4221 (2) on page 181, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.248623, {"references":["Brants, A. (1827) Het Geslacht der Muizen door Linnaeus opgesteld, Volgens de Tegenswoordige toestand der Wetenschap in Familien, Geslachten en Soorten verdeeld. Gedrukt ter Akademische Boekdrukkery, Berlin, xii + 190 pp, 1 plate.","Lichtenstein, H. (1830) Darstellung neuer oder wenig bekannter Saugethiere Abbildungen und Beschreibungen von funf und sechzig Arten und funtzig colorirten Steindrucktafeln nach den Originalen des Zoologischen Museum der Universitat zu Berlin. C. G. Luderitz, Berlin, unpaginated text belonging to 50 plates. [Lichtenstein's Darstellungen was published in parts from 1827 to 1834].","Moojen, J. (1948) Speciation in the Brazilian spiny rats (genus Proechimys, family Echimyidae). University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History, 1, 301 - 406","Iack-Ximenes, G. E. (2005) Sistematica de Trinomys Thomas, 1921 (Rodentia, Hystricognathi, Echimyidae). Ph. D. dissertation, Instituto de Biociencias, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, 265 pp.","Pessoa, L. M., Tavares, W. C., Oliveira, J. A. & Patton, J. L. (2015) Genus Trinomys Thomas, 1921. In: Patton, J. L., Pardinas U. F. J. & D'Elia, G. (Eds.), Mammals of South America, vol. 2, rodents. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 999 - 1019."]}

Uroderma bilobatum Peters, 1866 (ZMB_MAM 411) Peters (1866a) described the genus Uroderma based on a specimen donated to him by Dr. Eduard R��ppell. At that time, Peters associated this specimen with Wagner���s (1943) Phyllostoma personatum, a taxon then recognized as belonging to the genus Artibeus (not Phyllostoma G. Cuvier, 1800) (Fig. 3). Peters (1866a), in fact, appears to have considered Uroderma as a subgenus of Artibeus, characterizing the new specimen as an Artibeus with five upper and five lower cheek teeth (Gardner 2008b). The identity of Wagner���s Phyllostoma personatum, however, is uncertain. Peters (1866b) himself later stated that Wagner���s description of P. personatum, i.e. an animal with four facial stripes and a single dorsal one, tail absent, and narrow uropatagium, is not unambiguous and may represent a large Chiroderma such as C. doriae, or a Platyrrhinus such as P. lineatus (also see Rehn [1901] and Gardner [2008b]). As stated by Gardner (2008b:345), the only way to confirm the identity of Phyllostoma personatum Wagner, 1843 is to find the type specimen, if it still exits, presumably collected by Natterer in Ipanema (Pelzeln 1883). Based on the difficulty to define Phyllostoma personatum and the lack of specimens clearly attributed to it, Peters (1866b) decided that the specimen donated by R��ppell was a distinct species. Based on four specimens, one from " St. Paulo in Brasilien " (ZMB _MAM 411), collected by Sellow, two from Cayenne (ZMB _MAM 409, 410), collected by Delbruck, and the R��ppell���s specimen in the Frankfurt museum, whose provenance is not known (Andersen 1908:220), Peters (1866b:394���395) described Uroderma bilobatum. Andersen (1908:220) designated as lectotype the subadult ZMB _MAM 411 (skin and skull) from Sellow, supposedly from S��o Paulo (Figs. 2 c, e, 3). Consequently, the type locality of Uroderma bilobatum became ��� St. Paulo, in Brasilien ��� (Andersen 1908). Most authors have assigned S��o Paulo, Brazil, as the type locality of U. bilobatum (e.g., Andersen 1908; Husson 1962; Davis 1968; Baker & Clark 1987; Koopman 1993; Simmons 2005; Gardner 2008b). However, references to ���Ipanema, S��o Paulo,��� as the type locality of Phyllostoma personatum, can also be found in the literature (Vieira 1942, 1945, 1955; Cabrera 1958; Husson 1978; Taddei & Reis 1980, p. 364; Peracchi & Nogueira 2010). Vieira (1942) appears to have initiated this error, and some subsequent authors followed him (see Gardner 2008b:344���345). The reason behind Vieira���s assignment, however, is not clear, but seems to be an attempt to restrict the type locality. Although Vieira (1942:363) had recognized that Peters��� (1866a) species was not a junior synonym of Wagner��s (1843) Uroderma personatum, he included Stenoderma (Uroderma) personatum in the synonymy of U. bilobatum, a name combination previously used by Pelzeln (1883) based on a specimen collected by Natterer in ���Ypanema���. This specimen was probably the same one used by Wagner (1843) to describe Phyllostoma personatum (S. Engelberger pers. comm.), but Vieira may have considered it to be an additional specimen (Pelzeln [1883] is not unequivocal in this respect). This interpretation is plausible if we consider Vieira's (1945:403) later statement that Natterer collected a specimen of U. bilobatum in Ipanema. Vieira (1942) did not explicitly attempt to introduce type locality restrictions, but some of his assignments have been accepted as such (e.g., Husson 1978:123). There is a discrepancy between labels that also can be a source of confusion concerning the information associated with the lectotype of U. bilobatum. The old catalogue entry of the Berlin museum says ��� Uroderma bilobatum var. personatus, Brasil, Sellow,��� while the specimen label reads ��� Uroderma bilobatum Ptrs., 411, Sao Paulo, Sello��� (Figs. 2 c���3). Cory T. Carvalho (1980:55), citing Pelzeln (1883), reported U. bilobatum in S��o Paulo and added two additional localities, Piquete and Botucatu. Since Carvalho based his records on specimens housed at MZUSP, we verified all bat specimens in this collection from Botucatu (12 specimens) and Piquete (44 specimens); none of which are U. bilobatum. Moreover, in the MZUSP, there is a series of Platyrrhinus lineatus composed of eight specimens from Atafona, Rio de Janeiro (MZUSP 15725���15732), misidentified as Uroderma bilobatum by C. T. Carvalho. Another vouchered specimen record from S��o Paulo is a pregnant female captured in Itirapina (Sato et al. 2015). We examined photographs of this specimen and conclusively identify it as belonging to the genus Platyrrhinus. The record from Fazenda Provid��ncia, Rio de Janeiro (Avilla et al. 2001), is based on an animal that escaped (Peracchi & Nogueira 2010), and another potential record from S��o Carlos, S��o Paulo (Muylaert et al. 2014), is based on an intentionally released animal (R. Muylaert pers. comm.). The first and only record from Paran�� was reported by Reis et al. (1998:97), where the species is marked with an asterisk. In a footnote on the following page (p. 98), the authors explain that the marked species ������ were captured after the publication [sic] of the works done in the region���. By contacting researchers that have worked in the mammal collection of Universidade de Londrina, where the bats reported in Reis et al. (1998) were vouchered, we confirmed that there are no specimens of Uroderma in the collection (pers. comm., C.B. Batista, G.Z. Resende, I.P. Lima). Therefore, subsequent reports of U. bilobatum for the state of Paran�� and southern Brazil (Reis et al. 2003, 2006; Miretzki 2003; Passos et al. 2010), all based on the record presented by Reis et al. (1998), should be disregarded. The forests of southern and southeastern S��o Paulo have been intensively sampled with mist nets for more than 20 years and there is no vouchered evidence confirming the presence of U. bilobatum in the state (Trajano 1985; Fenton et al. 1999; Gregorin & de Vivo, 2001; Passos et al. 2003; Arnone 2008). In addition, the species has not been confirmed in the heavily sampled states of Rio de Janeiro (Peracchi & Nogueira 2010) and Esp��rito Santo (Mendes et al. 2010). The southernmost localities where Uroderma bilobatum is known to occur, based on voucher specimens, are Caratinga (19��47������S 42��08���W), state of Minas Gerais (Tavares et al. 2010), Itapebi (15��57���S 39��32���W), state of Bahia (Faria et al. 2006), and Itagib�� (14��17���S 39��50���W) (ZUEC 275), also in the state of Bahia. The route travelled by Sellow in eastern Brazil included Itapebi (Fig. 1). Therefore, based on Sellow���s itinerary, the absence of the species from several intensively sampled states, and on the known occurrence of the species, it seems that the type locality of Uroderma bilobatum cannot be more restricted than ��� eastern Brazil ���., Published as part of Garbino, Guilherme S. T. & Nogueira, Marcelo R., 2017, On the mammals collected by Friedrich Sellow in Brazil and Uruguay (1814 ��� 1831), with special reference to the types and their provenance, pp. 172-190 in Zootaxa 4221 (2) on pages 177-178, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.248623, {"references":["Peters, W. (1866 a) Uber einige neue oder weniger bekannte Flederthiere. Monatsberichte der Koniglichen Preussische Akademie des Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1867, 16 - 25.","Peters, W. (1866 b) Uber neue oder ungenugend bekannte Flederthiere (Vampyrops, Uroderma, Chiroderma, Ametrida, Tylostoma, Vespertilio, Vesperugo) und Nager (Tylomys, Lasiomys). Monatsberichte der Koniglichen Preussische Akademie des Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1867, 392 - 411. [2 pls.]","Rehn, J. A. G. (1901) Notes on Chiroptera. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 52, 755 - 759.","Wagner, J. A. (1843) Diagnosen neuer Arten brasilischer Handflugler. Archiv fur Naturgeschichte, 9 (1), 365 - 368.","Pelzeln A. von (1883) Brasilische Saugethiere: Resultate von Johann Natterer's Reisen in den Jahren 1817 bis 1835. Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Osterreich in Wien, 33 (Suppl.), 1 - 140.","Andersen, K. (1908) A monograph of the chiropteran genera Uroderma, Enchisthenes, and Artibeus. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 78 (2), 203 - 319.","Husson, A. M. (1962) The bats of Suriname. Zoologische Verhandelingen, Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie te Leiden, 58, 1 - 282.","Davis, W. B. (1968) Review of the genus Uroderma (Chiroptera). Journal of Mammalogy, 49 (4), 676 - 698. https: // doi. org / 10.2307 / 1378728","Baker, R. J & Clark, C. L. (1987) Uroderma bilobatum. Mammalian species, 279, 1 - 4.","Koopman, K. F. (1993) Order Chiroptera. In: Wilson, D. E. & Reeder, D. M. (Eds.). Mammal species of the world, a taxonomic and geographic reference. 2 nd edition. The Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 137 - 241,","Simmons, N. B. (2005) Order Chiroptera. In: Wilson, D. E. & Reeder, D. M. (Eds.), Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference, vol. 2. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 312 - 529.","Vieira, C. O. da C. (1942) Ensaio monografico sobre os quiropteros do Brasil. Arquivos de Zoologia do Estado de Sao Paulo, 3, 219 - 471.","Vieira, C. O. da C. (1945) Sobre uma colecao de mamiferos de Mato Grosso. Arquivos de Zoologia do Estado de Sao Paulo, 4, 395 - 430.","Vieira, C. O. da C. (1955) Lista remissiva dos mamiferos do Brasil. Arquivos de Zoologia do Estado de Sao Paulo, 8, 341 - 474.","Cabrera, A. (1958 [1957]) Catalogo de los mamiferos de America del Sur. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales \" Bernardino Rivadavia, \" Ciencias Zoologicas, 4: xvi + iv + 308, 1957.","Husson, A. M. (1978) The mammals of Suriname. Zoologische Monographieen van het Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie No. 2. E. J. Brill, Leiden, xxxiv + 569 pp. + 160 pls.","Taddei, V. A. & Reis, N. R. (1980) Notas sobre alguns morcegos da Ilha de Maraca, Territorio Federal de Roraima (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Acta Amazonica, 10 (2), 363 - 368.","Peracchi, A. L. & Nogueira, M. R. (2010) Lista anotada dos morcegos do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, sudeste do Brasil. Chiroptera Neotropical, 16 (1), 508 - 519.","Carvalho, C. T. (1980) Mamiferos dos parques e reservas de Sao Paulo. Silvicultura, Sao Paulo, 13 / 14, 49 - 72.","Sato, T. M., Carvalho-Ricardo, M. C. D., Uieda, W. & Passos, F. C. (2015) Estrutura da comunidade de morcegos (Mammalia, Chiroptera) da Estacao Experimental de Itirapina, estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia (Sao Paulo), 55 (1), 1 - 11.","Avilla, L. S., Rozensztranch, A. & Abrantes, E. A. L. (2001) First record of the South American flat-headed bat Neoplatymops mattogrossensis (Vieira, 1942) in Southeastern Brazil (Chiroptera, Molossidae). Boletim do Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, 463, 1 - 6.","Muylaert, R., Teixeira, R. C., Hortenci, L., Estevao, J. R., Rogeri, P. K. & Mello, M. A. R. (2014) Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in a cerrado landscape in Sao Carlos, southeastern Brazil. Check List, 10 (2), 287 - 291.","Reis, N. R., Peracchi, A. L., Lima, I. P., Sekiama, M. L. & Rocha, V. J. (1998) Updated list of the chiropterans of the city of Londrina, Parana, Brazil. Chiroptera Neotropical, 4 (2), 96 - 98.","Reis, N. R., Barbieri, M. L. S., Lima, I. P. & Peracchi, A. L. (2003) O que e melhor para manter a riqueza de especies de morcegos (Mammalia, Chiroptera): um fragmento florestal grande ou varios fragmentos de pequeno tamanho? Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 20 (2), 225 - 230.","Reis, N. R., Lima, I. P. & Peracchi, A. L. (2006) Morcegos (Chiroptera) da area urbana de Londrina, Parana, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 19 (3), 739 - 746.","Miretzki, M. (2003) Morcegos do Estado do Parana, Brasil (Mammalia, Chiroptera): riqueza de especies, distribuicao e sintese do conhecimento atual. Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia, 43 (6), 101 - 138.","Passos, F. C., Miranda, J. M., Bernardi, I. P., Kaku-Oliveira, N. Y., & Munster, L. C. (2010) Morcegos da Regiao Sul do Brasil: analise comparativa da riqueza de especies, novos registros e atualizacoes nomenclaturais (Mammalia, Chiroptera). Iheringia, Serie Zoologia, 100 (1), 25 - 34.","Trajano, E. (1985) Ecologia de populacoes de morcegos cavernicolas em uma regiao carstica do sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 2 (5), 255 - 320. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1590 / S 0101 - 81751984000100001","Passos, F. C., Silva, W. R., Pedro, W. A. & Bonin, M. R. (2003) Frugivoria em morcegos (Mammalia, Chiroptera) no Parque Estadual Intervales, Sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 20 (3), 511 - 517.","Arnone, I. S. (2008) Estudo da comunidade de morcegos na area carstica do Alto Ribeira - SP: Uma comparacao com 1980. M. Sc. thesis, Instituto de Biociencias, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, 116 pp.","Mendes, P., Vieira, T. B., Oprea, M., Lopes, S. R., Ditchfield, A. D. & Zortea, M. (2010) O conhecimento sobre morcegos (Chiroptera: Mammalia) do estado do Espirito Santo, sudeste do Brasil. Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia, 50 (22), 363 - 373.","Tavares, V. C., Aguiar, L. M., Perini, F. A., Falcao, F. C. & Gregorin, R. (2010) Bats of the state of Minas Gerais, southeastern Brasil. Chiroptera Neotropical, 16 (1), 675 - 705.","Faria, D., Soares-Santos, B. & Sampaio, E. (2006) Bats from the Atlantic rainforest of southern Bahia, Brazil. Biota Neotropica, 6 (2), 1 - 13. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1590 / S 1676 - 06032006000200022"]}

Callithrix aurita (ZMB_MAM 283) The specimen we examined, a skin without associated skull (Fig. 7 a), has only ��� Brasilien ��� as the collecting locality. From Sellow���s itinerary, ZMB _MAM 283 may have been collected in southeastern Minas Gerais, eastern S��o Paulo or southern Rio de Janeiro., Published as part of Garbino, Guilherme S. T. & Nogueira, Marcelo R., 2017, On the mammals collected by Friedrich Sellow in Brazil and Uruguay (1814 ��� 1831), with special reference to the types and their provenance, pp. 172-190 in Zootaxa 4221 (2) on page 182, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.248623

Ctenomys torquatus Lichtenstein, 1830 (ZMB_MAM 1198, 1199) Lectotype (ZMB _MAM 1198) and paralectotype (ZMB _MAM 1199) were designated by Langguth & Abella (1970), and both consist of well-preserved skins. The skull of ZMB _MAM 1198 is damaged, but the skull of ZMB _MAM 1199 is practically intact. Ctenomys torquatus is a hystricognath rodent with a restricted distribution in northwestern Uruguay and in the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul (Bidau 2015). Lichtenstein (1830) did not give an exact locality, but mentioned that the type specimen of Ctenomys torquatus came from the banks of the Rio Uruguay. As Bidau (2015:2703) notes, there is still confusion on the type locality of this tuco-tuco. If we compare Sellow���s itinerary (Fig. 1) with the relatively restricted geographic distribution of the species, there are many locality possibilities. The labels of both specimens read ��� Uruguay Sellow 1828.��� With this temporal information, it should be possible to restrict the type locality to areas visited by Sellow in 1828 where C. torquatus occurs, as Langguth & Abella (1970) have suggested. In 1828, however, the naturalist was traveling northwards from the state of Santa Catarina to S��o Paulo, far from Rio Grande do Sul, where the species is found. In December 1827 Sellow already was in the state of Santa Catarina (Urban 1893), where the species does not occur. The zoological specimens he collected from October 1827 to May 1830 came from the Brazilian states of Santa Catarina, Paran�� and S��o Paulo (Streseman 1948). Due to the impossibility of determining an exact type locality for this geographically restricted and taxonomically well-defined species, we believe that a further restriction of its type locality is unwarranted at this time. We acknowledge that the locality must lie along the route traveled by Sellow in northwestern Uruguay and southwestern Rio Grande do Sul., Published as part of Garbino, Guilherme S. T. & Nogueira, Marcelo R., 2017, On the mammals collected by Friedrich Sellow in Brazil and Uruguay (1814 ��� 1831), with special reference to the types and their provenance, pp. 172-190 in Zootaxa 4221 (2) on page 180, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.248623, {"references":["Lichtenstein, H. (1830) Darstellung neuer oder wenig bekannter Saugethiere Abbildungen und Beschreibungen von funf und sechzig Arten und funtzig colorirten Steindrucktafeln nach den Originalen des Zoologischen Museum der Universitat zu Berlin. C. G. Luderitz, Berlin, unpaginated text belonging to 50 plates. [Lichtenstein's Darstellungen was published in parts from 1827 to 1834].","Langguth, A. & Abella, A. (1970) Las especies uruguayas del genero Ctenomys (Rodentia Octodontidae). Comunicaciones Zoologicas del Museo de Historia Natural de Montevideo, 10, 1 - 20.","Bidau, C. J. (2015) Family Ctenomyidae Lesson, 1842. In: Patton, J. L., Pardinas U. F. J. & D'Elia, G. (Eds.), Mammals of South America, vol. 2, rodents. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 818 - 877.","Urban, I. (1893) Biographische Skizzen. 1. Friedrich Sellow (1789 - 1831). Botanische Jahrbucher fur Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie, volume 17, pp. 177 - 198. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1038 / 047413 a 0","Stresemann, E. (1948) Der Naturforscher Friedrich Sellow († 1831) und sein Beitrag zur Kenntnis Brasiliens. Zoologische Jahrbucher. Abteilung fur Systematik, Okologie und Geographie der Tiere, volume 77, pp. 401 - 425."]}

Leontopithecus chrysopygus (ZMB_MAM 303, 304, 305) Sellow collected three specimens (skins only) of the black lion tamarin (Leontopithecus chrysopygus), a rare callitrichid restricted to the state of S��o Paulo (Fig. 7 b). The labels of each specimen read ��� S. Paulo Sellow ���. The naturalist probably collected all three in Ipanema (the type locality of Jacchus chrysopygus Mikan), where he and Olfers stayed in 1819 and where Sellow returned in 1829. Nevertheless, every locality visited by Sellow between the Tiet�� and Paranapanema rivers are potential candidates as the collecting locality of these specimens. More importantly, it appears that the existence of these three specimens has not been recorded in the literature until recently (Garbino et al. 2016). Previous literature records include the series collected by Natterer in Ipanema and Vargem Grande and some specimens collected by E. Garbe, A. Hempel and O. Hummel (Coimbra-Filho 1970; Hershkovitz 1977)., Published as part of Garbino, Guilherme S. T. & Nogueira, Marcelo R., 2017, On the mammals collected by Friedrich Sellow in Brazil and Uruguay (1814 ��� 1831), with special reference to the types and their provenance, pp. 172-190 in Zootaxa 4221 (2) on page 182, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.248623, {"references":["Garbino, G. S. T., Rezende, G. C. & Valladares-Padua, C. (2016) Pelage Variation and Distribution of the Black Lion Tamarin, Leontopithecus chrysopygus. Folia Primatologica, 87 (4), 244 - 261. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1159 / 000450998","Coimbra-Filho, A. F. (1970) Acerca da redescoberta de Leontideus chrysopygus (Mikan, 1823) e apontamentos sobre sua ecologia (Callitrichidae, Primates). Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 30, 609 - 615.","Hershkovitz, P. (1977) Living New World monkeys (Platyrrhini), with an introduction to primates, vol. 1. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1117 pp."]}

Mus nigrita Lichtenstein, 1829 (ZMB_MAM 1698) Specimen ZMB _MAM 1698 includes a relatively well-preserved skin, missing some hairs in the rostral region (Fig. 4 b), a skull missing the basicranium and the posterior braincase, and two mandibular rami, with the coronoid missing on the left ramus. The holotype, by monotypy, was collected by Sellow and Olfers. Lichtenstein (1830) stated that the specimen came from ��� der Gegend von Rio de Janeiro ���, and the label and Generalkatalog read ��� Rio de Janeiro. ��� Thus, we can safely assume that the type locality of Mus nigrita lies in the state of Rio de Janeiro., Published as part of Garbino, Guilherme S. T. & Nogueira, Marcelo R., 2017, On the mammals collected by Friedrich Sellow in Brazil and Uruguay (1814 ��� 1831), with special reference to the types and their provenance, pp. 172-190 in Zootaxa 4221 (2) on page 178, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.248623, {"references":["Lichtenstein, H. (1830) Darstellung neuer oder wenig bekannter Saugethiere Abbildungen und Beschreibungen von funf und sechzig Arten und funtzig colorirten Steindrucktafeln nach den Originalen des Zoologischen Museum der Universitat zu Berlin. C. G. Luderitz, Berlin, unpaginated text belonging to 50 plates. [Lichtenstein's Darstellungen was published in parts from 1827 to 1834]."]}