Search

Introduction Methods Result Conclusion While digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has proven to enhance cancer detection and reduce recall rates (RR), its integration into BreastScreen Australia for screening has been limited, in part due to perceived cost implications. This study aims to assess the cost effectiveness of digital mammography (DM) compared with synthesized mammography and DBT (SM + DBT) in a first round screening context for short‐term outcomes.Clients recalled for nonspecific density (NSD) as a single lesion by both readers at the Northern Sydney Central Coast BreastScreen service in 2019 were included. Prior images were excluded to simulate first‐round screening. Eleven radiologists read DM and synthesized mammography with DBT (SM + DBT) images 4 weeks apart. Recall rates (RR), reading time, and diagnostic parameters were measured, and costs for screen reading and assessment were calculated.Among 65 clients studied, 13 were diagnosed with cancer, with concordant cancer recalls. SM + DBT reduced recall rates (RR), increased reading time, maintained cancer detection sensitivity, and significantly improved other diagnostic parameters, particularly false positive rates. Benign biopsy recalls remained equivalent. While SM + DBT screen reading cost was significantly higher than DM (DM AU$890 ± 186 vs SM + DBT AU$1279 ± 265; P < 0.001), the assessment cost (DM AU$29,504 ± 9427 vs SM + DBT AU$18,021 ± 5606; P < 0.001), and combined screen reading and assessment costs were significantly lower (DM AU$30,394 ± 9508 vs SM + DBT AU$19,300 ± 5721; P = 0.001). SM + DBT screen reading and assessment of 65 patients resulted in noteworthy cost savings (AU$11,094), equivalent to assessing 12 additional clients.In first round screening, DBT yields significant cost savings by effectively reducing unnecessary recalls to assessment while maintaining diagnostic efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Purpose: This study used serial MRI to assess the absorption of a poly l-lactide Bioabsorbable interference screw used in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a 4-strand hamstring technique. Methods: A consecutive series of ten patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a 4-strand hamstring technique were assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans at 1, 2, 4, 7 and 10years postoperatively. Results: No resorption had occurred after 4years in any of the patients. By 7years screw absorption was complete in seven patients and had progressed in three. New cyst formation occurred in 3 patients between 5 and 7years. Half the patients displayed small fluid collections within the tibial tunnels. At 10years all screws were fully absorbed; however cyst formation was common, including the development of a new cyst in the period between 7 and 10years in one patient. None of the patients had instability, persistent effusions, or clinically detectable adverse reactions to the screws. Conclusions: This study has shown that poly l-lactide bioabsorbable screws take longer to resorb than initial in vitro data suggested. It is unclear whether ganglion formation within the tibial tunnel is related to screw resorption or the hamstring graft. The theoretical advantages of bioabsorbable screws must be weighed against these findings. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: This study used serial MRI to assess the absorption of a poly l-lactide Bioabsorbable interference screw used in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a 4-strand hamstring technique. Methods: A consecutive series of ten patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a 4-strand hamstring technique were assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans at 1, 2, 4, 7 and 10 years postoperatively. Results: No resorption had occurred after 4 years in any of the patients. By 7 years screw absorption was complete in seven patients and had progressed in three. New cyst formation occurred in 3 patients between 5 and 7 years. Half the patients displayed small fluid collections within the tibial tunnels. At 10 years all screws were fully absorbed; however cyst formation was common, including the development of a new cyst in the period between 7 and 10 years in one patient. None of the patients had instability, persistent effusions, or clinically detectable adverse reactions to the screws. Conclusions: This study has shown that poly l-lactide bioabsorbable screws take longer to resorb than initial in vitro data suggested. It is unclear whether ganglion formation within the tibial tunnel is related to screw resorption or the hamstring graft. The theoretical advantages of bioabsorbable screws must be weighed against these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]