1. Long-Term Comparison of Mobile-Bearing vs Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty
- Author
-
James I. Huddleston, Steven T. Woolson, and Noah J. Epstein
- Subjects
musculoskeletal diseases ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Knee Joint ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Radiography ,Total knee arthroplasty ,Prosthesis Design ,Prosthesis ,law.invention ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Humans ,Medicine ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Longitudinal Studies ,Prospective Studies ,Range of Motion, Articular ,Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ,Prospective cohort study ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Aged, 80 and over ,business.industry ,Incidence ,Retrospective cohort study ,Middle Aged ,musculoskeletal system ,Arthralgia ,Arthroplasty ,Surgery ,Treatment Outcome ,Polyethylene ,Knee Prosthesis ,business ,Range of motion ,human activities ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Few published reports have been published regarding a comparison of the long-term outcomes between mobile- (MB) and fixed-bearing component designs for knee arthroplasty. The minimum 10-year clinical and radiologic follow-up of an unselected consecutive series of 89 patients (107 knees) who were randomized to have one of these different designs for primary arthroplasty was done. Twenty-six patients (30 knees) who had a fixed-bearing design and 24 patients (33 knees) who had an MB prosthesis were available for follow-up. Two MB knees were revised for aseptic loosening of a tibial component in one and femoral component fracture in the other. In patients who did not have revision surgery, there were no differences between the groups with respect to mean Knee Society scores, knee flexion, or pain scores.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF