Search

Abstract Background In Zanzibar, the Ministry of Health and partners accelerated malaria control from September 2003 onwards. The impact of the scale-up of insecticide-treated nets (ITN), indoor-residual spraying (IRS) and artemisinin-combination therapy (ACT) combined on malaria burden was assessed at six out of seven in-patient health facilities. Methods Numbers of outpatient and inpatient cases and deaths were compared between 2008 and the pre-intervention period 1999-2003. Reductions were estimated by segmented log-linear regression, adjusting the effect size for time trends during the pre-intervention period. Results In 2008, for all age groups combined, malaria deaths had fallen by an estimated 90% (95% confidence interval 55-98%)(p < 0.025), malaria in-patient cases by 78% (48-90%), and parasitologically-confirmed malaria out-patient cases by 99.5% (92-99.9%). Anaemia in-patient cases decreased by 87% (57-96%); anaemia deaths and out-patient cases declined without reaching statistical significance due to small numbers. Reductions were similar for children under-five and older ages. Among under-fives, the proportion of all-cause deaths due to malaria fell from 46% in 1999-2003 to 12% in 2008 (p < 0.01) and that for anaemia from 26% to 4% (p < 0.01). Cases and deaths due to other causes fluctuated or increased over 1999-2008, without consistent difference in the trend before and after 2003. Conclusions Scaling-up effective malaria interventions reduced malaria-related burden at health facilities by over 75% within 5 years. In high-malaria settings, intensified malaria control can substantially contribute to reaching the Millennium Development Goal 4 target of reducing under-five mortality by two-thirds between 1990 and 2015.

Abstract Background In the past decade there has been increasing visibility of malaria control efforts at the national and international levels. The factors that have enhanced this scenario are the availability of proven interventions such as artemisinin-based combination therapy, the wide scale use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and a renewed emphasis in indoor residual house-spraying. Concurrently, there has been a window of opportunity of financial commitments from organizations such as the Global Fund for HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM), the President's Malaria Initiative and the World Bank Booster programme. Methods The case study uses the health policy analysis framework to analyse the implementation of a public-private partnership approach embarked upon by the government of Tanzania in malaria control – 'The Tanzania National Voucher Scheme'- and in this synthesis, emphasis is on the challenges faced by the scheme during the pre-implementation (2001 – 2004) and implementation phases (2004 – 2005). Qualitative research tools used include: document review, interview with key informants, stakeholder's analysis, force-field analysis, time line of events, policy characteristic analysis and focus group discussions. The study is also complemented by a cross-sectional survey, which was conducted at the Rufiji Health Demographic Surveillance Site, where a cohort of women of child-bearing age were followed up regarding access and use of ITNs. Results The major challenges observed include: the re-introduction of taxes on mosquito nets and related products, procurement and tendering procedures in the implementation of the GFATM, and organizational arrangements and free delivery of mosquito nets through a Presidential initiative. Conclusion The lessons gleaned from this synthesis include: (a) the consistency of the stakeholders with a common vision, was an important strength in overcoming obstacles, (b) senior politicians often steered the policy agenda when the policy in question was a 'crisis event', the stakes and the visibility were high, (c) national stakeholders in policy making have an advantage in strengthening alliances with international organizations, where the latter can become extremely influential in solving bottlenecks as the need arises, and (d) conflict can be turned into an opportunity, for example the Presidential initiative has inadvertently provided Tanzania with important lessons in the organization of 'catch-up' campaigns.

High‐throughput Plasmodium genomic data is increasingly useful in assessing prevalence of clinically important mutations and malaria transmission patterns. Understanding parasite diversity is important for identification of specific human or parasite populations that can be targeted by control programmes, and to monitor the spread of mutations associated with drug resistance. An up‐to‐date understanding of regional parasite population dynamics is also critical to monitor the impact of control efforts. However, this data is largely absent from high‐burden nations in Africa, and to date, no such analysis has been conducted for malaria parasites in Tanzania countrywide. To this end, over 1,000 P. falciparum clinical isolates were collected in 2017 from 13 sites in seven administrative regions across Tanzania, and parasites were genotyped at 1,800 variable positions genome‐wide using molecular inversion probes. Population structure was detectable among Tanzanian P. falciparum parasites, approximately separating parasites from the northern and southern districts and identifying genetically admixed populations in the north. Isolates from nearby districts were more likely to be genetically related compared to parasites sampled from more distant districts. Known drug resistance mutations were seen at increased frequency in northern districts (including two infections carrying pfk13‐R561H), and additional variants with undetermined significance for antimalarial resistance also varied by geography. Malaria Indicator Survey (2017) data corresponded with genetic findings, including average region‐level complexity‐of‐infection and malaria prevalence estimates. The parasite populations identified here provide important information on extant spatial patterns of genetic diversity of Tanzanian parasites, to which future surveys of genetic relatedness can be compared. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Introduction Malaria is the largest cause of health services attendance, hospital admissions and child deaths in Tanzania. At the Abuja Summit in April 2000 Tanzania committed itself to protect 60% of its population at high risk of malaria by 2005. The country is, therefore, determined to ensure that sustainable malaria control using insecticide-treated nets is carried out on a national scale. Case description Tanzania has been involved for two decades in the research process for developing insecticide-treated nets as a malaria control tool, from testing insecticides and net types, to assessing their efficacy and effectiveness, and exploring new ways of distribution. Since 2000, the emphasis has changed from a project approach to that of a concerted multi-stakeholder action for taking insecticide-treated nets to national scale (NATNETS). This means creating conditions that make insecticide-treated nets accessible and affordable to all those at risk of malaria in the country. This paper describes Tanzania's experience in (1) creating an enabling environment for insecticide-treated nets scale-up, (2) promoting the development of a commercial sector for insecticide-treated nets, and (3) targeting pregnant women with highly subsidized insecticide-treated nets through a national voucher scheme. As a result, nearly 2 million insecticide-treated nets and 2.2 million re-treatment kits were distributed in 2004. Conclusion National upscaling of insecticide-treated nets is possible when the programme is well designed, coordinated and supported by committed stakeholders; the Abuja target of protecting 60% of those at high risk is feasible, even for large endemic countries.

Background: In 2021, nationwide malaria molecular surveillance revealed a high prevalence of a validated artemisinin resistance marker, the kelch13 (k13) Arg561His mutation, in the Kagera region of northwestern Tanzania. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-amodiaquine and to confirm the presence of artemisinin partial resistance (ART-R) in the Karagwe district of this region., Methods: This single-arm, therapeutic efficacy study was carried out at the Bukangara dispensary in the Karagwe district of the Kagera region in northwestern Tanzania. Eligible participants were aged between 6 months and 120 months, had confirmed Plasmodium falciparum asexual parasitaemia, and met other inclusion criteria according to WHO's standard protocol. Participants were enrolled, treated sequentially with either artemether-lumefantrine or artesunate-amodiaquine, and assessed clinically and parasitologically for 28 days as per WHO protocol. Parasitaemia was measured every 8 h until day 3, on day 7, and then during weekly follow-up visits until day 28. Mutations in the k13 gene and extended haplotypes with the mutations were analysed, and comparisons were made with previous samples collected in the same region of Kagera and in Rwanda and southeast Asia. The primary endpoint was PCR-corrected cure rate., Findings: Between April 29 and Sept 1, 2022, 343 patients were screened, of whom 176 were enrolled: 88 in each treatment group. The PCR-corrected cure rate was 98% (95% CI 91-100) in the artemether-lumefantrine group and 100% (96-100) in the artesunate-amodiaquine group. Persistent parasitaemia on day 3 occurred in 11 (13%) of 88 patients in the artemether-lumefantrine group and 17 (19%) of 88 patients in the artesunate-amodiaquine group. Arg561His mutations on day 0 and parasitaemia on day 3 were reported in eight (9%) of 87 patients in the artemether-lumefantrine group and ten (12%) of 86 patients in the artesunate-amodiaquine group. The median parasite clearance half-life in patients harbouring parasites with Arg561His mutation was 6·1 h in the artemether-lumefantrine group and 6·0 h in the artesunate-amodiaquine group. Parasites with the Arg561His mutation were not similar to those from southeast Asia and Rwanda but had similar haplotypes to parasites reported in the same Tanzanian region of Kagera in 2021., Interpretation: This study confirms the presence of ART-R in Tanzania, although artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-amodiaquine showed high efficacy. A context-specific response strategy and vigilance to detect the reduced efficacy of current antimalarial treatments and ART-R in other parts of the country are urgently needed., Funding: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the US National Institutes of Health., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The emergence of the artemisinin partial resistance (ART-R) mutation in the Plasmodium falciparum kelch13 gene (k13), Arg561His, in Rwanda and the regional presence of polymorphisms affecting sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine have raised concern in neighbouring Tanzania. The goal of this study was to assess the status of antimalarial resistance in Tanzania, with a focus on the border with Rwanda, to understand the distribution of the Arg561His mutation, partner drug resistance, and resistance to chemoprevention drugs., Methods: In this cross-sectional survey, capillary dried blood spots were collected from malaria positive asymptomatic individuals in the community and symptomatic individuals in health facilities aged 6 months and older, in 13 regions of mainland Tanzania from Jan 31 to June 26, 2021. Exclusion criteria included residence of the areas other than the target sites, presenting to the health facility for care and treatment of conditions other than malaria, and not providing informed consent. Samples were assessed for antimalarial resistance polymorphisms and genetic relatedness using molecular inversion probes targeting P falciparum and short-read whole-genome sequencing. The primary outcome was the prevalence of molecular markers of antimalarial resistance at the region level, as well as at the district level in Kagera, a region in the northwest of the country at the border with Rwanda., Findings: 6855 (88·1%) of 7782 capillary dried blood spot samples collected were successfully genotyped. The overall prevalence of k13 Arg561His in Kagera was 7·7% (90% CI 6·0-9·4; 50 of 649), with the highest prevalence in the districts near the Rwandan border (22·8% [31 of 136] in Karagwe, 14·4% [17 of 118]) in Kyerwa, and 1·4% [two of 144] in Ngara). k13 Arg561His was uncommon in the other regions. Haplotype analysis suggested that some of these parasites are related to isolates collected in Rwanda in 2015, supporting regional spread of Arg561His. However, a novel k13 Arg561His haplotype was observed, potentially indicating a second origin in the region. Other validated k13 resistance polymorphisms (one Arg622Ile and two Ala675Val isolates) were also identified. A region of prevalent dihydrofolate reductase Ile164Leu mutation, associated with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance, was also identified in Kagera (15·2% [12·6-17·8%]; 80 of 526). The mutant crt Lys76Thr mutation, associated with chloroquine and amodiaquine resistance, was uncommon, occurring only in 75 of 2861 genotyped isolates, whereases the wild-type mdr1 Asn86Tyr allele, associated with reduced sensitivity to lumefantrine, was found in 99·7% (3819 of 3830) of samples countrywide., Interpretation: These findings show that the k13 Arg561His mutation is common in northwest Tanzania and that multiple emergences of ART-R, similar as to what was seen in southeast Asia, have occurred. Mutations associated with high levels of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance are common. These results raise concerns about the long-term efficacy of artemisinin and chemoprevention antimalarials in the region. Understanding how multiple emergences interact with drivers of regional spread is essential for combating ART-R in Africa., Funding: This study was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the National Institutes of Health., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)