Search

Objectives: Chemotherapy, including bendamustine, usually causes lymphocytopaenia and hypogammaglobulinaemia as side effects in patients with haematological malignancies. Therefore, the possibility has been considered that these immunological adverse events induced by bendamustine may lead to infectious diseases. However, lymphocytopaenia and/or hypogammaglobulinaemia have not yet been shown to have a statistically significant association with infection in cancer patients who receive bendamustine., Methods: We retrospectively studied 27 patients with relapsed or refractory indolent follicular lymphoma who were treated with bendamustine and rituximab (BR). In order to elucidate relationships between immune-related laboratory parameters (i.e. peripheral blood leukocyte, neutrophil, lymphocyte and immunoglobulin G [IgG]) and infectious events, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed., Results: Infectious diseases occurred in 11 patients (11/27, 41%), including 3 (3/27, 11%) with severe diseases. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) showed that the lowest IgG level during and after BR discriminated infectious events (cut-off value, 603 mg/dL) with 81.8% sensitivity and 68.8% specificity (AUC, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.52-0.90). Furthermore, a multivariate regression analysis revealed that the minimal serum IgG value during and after BR therapy was the only variable that was significantly associated with infection (odds ratio, 8.29; 95% CI, 1.19-57.62; p value, 0.03)., Conclusion: Serum IgG ≤603 mg/dL during and after BR therapy was independently associated with an increased risk of infection. The monitoring of serum IgG during chemotherapy may help to predict the development of infection in blood cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with bendamustine in combination with rituximab.

The chemoprotective properties of sulforaphane (SF), derived from cruciferous vegetables, are widely acknowledged to arise from its potent induction of xenobiotic-metabolizing and antioxidant enzymes. However, much less is known about the impact of SF on the efficacy of cancer therapy through the modulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes. To identify proteins modulated by a low concentration of SF, we treated HT29 colon cancer cells with 2.5 μM SF. Protein abundance changes were detected by stable isotope labeling of amino acids in cell culture. Among 18 proteins found to be significantly up-regulated, aldo-keto reductase 1C3 (AKR1C3), bioactivating the DNA cross-linking prodrug PR-104A, was further characterized. Preconditioning HT29 cells with SF reduced the EC50 of PR-104A 3.6-fold. The increase in PR-104A cytotoxicity was linked to AKR1C3 abundance and activity, both induced by SF in a dose-dependent manner. This effect was reproducible in a second colon cancer cell line, SW620, but not in other colon cancer cell lines where AKR1C3 abundance and activity were absent or barely detectable and could not be induced by SF. Interestingly, SF had no significant influence on PR-104A cytotoxicity in non-cancerous, immortalized human colonic epithelial cell lines expressing either low or high levels of AKR1C3. In conclusion, the enhanced response of PR-104A after preconditioning with SF was apparent only in cancer cells provided that AKR1C3 is expressed, while its expression in non-cancerous cells did not elicit such a response. Therefore, a subset of cancers may be susceptible to combined food-derived component and prodrug treatments with no harm to normal tissues.

Nitrogen mustard (NM) is a vesicant that causes lung injury and fibrosis, accompanied by a persistent macrophage inflammatory response. In these studies we analyzed the spleen as a source of these cells. Splenectomized (SPX) and sham control rats were treated intratracheally with NM (0.125 mg/kg) or PBS control. Macrophage responses were analyzed 1-7 days later. Splenectomy resulted in an increase in lung macrophages expressing CCR2, but a decrease in ATR-1α(+) cells, receptors important in bone marrow and spleen monocyte trafficking, respectively. Splenectomy was also associated with an increase in proinflammatory M1 (iNOS(+), CD11b(+)CD43(+)) macrophages in lungs of NM-treated rats, as well as greater upregulation of iNOS and COX-2 mRNA expression. Conversely, a decrease in CD11b(+)CD43(-) M2 macrophages was observed in SPX rats, with no changes in CD68(+), CD163(+), CD206(+), or YM-1(+) M2 macrophages, suggesting distinct origins of M2 subpopulations responding to NM. Macrophage expression of M2 genes including IL-10, ApoE, PTX-2, PTX-3, 5-HT2α, and 5-HT7 was also reduced in NM-treated SPX rats compared with shams, indicating impaired M2 activity. Changes in lung macrophages responding to NM as a consequence of splenectomy were correlated with exacerbated tissue injury and more rapid fibrogenesis. These data demonstrate that the spleen is a source of a subset of M2 macrophages with anti-inflammatory activity; moreover, in their absence, proinflammatory/cytotoxic M1 macrophages predominate in the lung, resulting in heightened pathology. Understanding the origin of macrophages and characterizing their phenotype after vesicant exposure may lead to more targeted therapeutics aimed at reducing toxicity and disease pathogenesis., (Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.)

Bendamustine has demonstrated clinical activity and a favorable safety profile as monotherapy or in combination with rituximab in lymphoid malignancies. As interventional trials do not always reflect clinical reality, we were interested in the treatment modalities and the outcome of bendamustine-based first-line therapy in patients with advanced indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in routine practice. Between April 2010 and October 2011, 324 patients were enrolled in a prospective non-interventional multicenter study. Choice of the bendamustine regimen was at the treating physician's discretion. Effectiveness was assessed by best response. Mean age at onset of therapy was 69 years. The majority (94 %) of the patients was treated with bendamustine in combination with rituximab at a median bendamustine dose of 177 mg/m(2) per cycle. Most often, bendamustine was administered on days 1 and 2 (87 %) at 4-week intervals over a median of 6 cycles. Two hundred eighty-one patients qualified for evaluation of response. The overall response rate was 86 % (complete response 43 %, partial response 43 %, stable disease 10 %, progressive disease 4 %). Side effects of all grades were documented for 161 of the 323 patients (50 %), most frequently affecting blood/bone marrow (35 %). Fifty-four (17 %) patients experienced side effects of grade 3 (15 %) or grade 4 (2 %), and two patients grade 5 toxicities. Bendamustine-based first-line treatment of patients with advanced indolent NHL and MCL in clinical routine practice was assessed as effective and well tolerated in our study. Response was comparable to results from interventional clinical trials.

There is a significant unmet need in effective therapy for relapsed myeloma patients once they become refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide. While data from the front line setting suggest bendamustine is superior to melphalan, there is no information defining optimal bendamustine dose in multiply-treated patients. We report a multi-centre randomized two-stage phase 2 trial simultaneously assessing deliverability and activity of two doses of bendamustine (60 mg/m2 vs. 100 mg/m2) days 1 and 8, thalidomide (100 mg) days 1-21 and low dose dexamethasone (20 mg) days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-d cycle. Ninety-four relapsing patients were treated on trial, with a median three prior treatment lines. A pre-planned interim deliverability and activity assessment led to closure of the 100 mg/m2 arm due to excess cytopenias, and led to amendment of entry criteria for cytopenias. Non-haematological toxicities including thromboembolism and neurotoxicity were infrequent. In the 60 mg/m2 arm, treatment was deliverable in 61.1% subjects and the partial response rate was 46.3% in the study eligible population, with 7.5 months progression-free survival. This study demonstrates bendamustine at 60 mg/m2 twice per month with thalidomide and dexamethasone is deliverable for repeated cycles in heavily pre-treated myeloma patients and has substantial clinical activity., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

We previously demonstrated vast expansion of hypoxic areas in the leukemic microenvironment and provided a rationale for using hypoxia-activated prodrugs. PR104 is a phosphate ester that is rapidly hydrolyzed in vivo to the corresponding alcohol PR-104A and further reduced to the amine and hydroxyl-amine nitrogen mustards that induce DNA cross-linking in hypoxic cells under low oxygen concentrations. In this phase I/II study, patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (n=40) after 1 or 2 prior treatments or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=10) after any number of prior treatments received PR104; dose ranged from 1.1 to 4 g/m(2). The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events were myelosuppression (anemia 62%, neutropenia 50%, thrombocytopenia 46%), febrile neutropenia (40%), infection (24%), and enterocolitis (14%). Ten of 31 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (32%) and 2 of 10 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (20%) who received 3 g/m(2) or 4 g/m(2) had a response (complete response, n=1; complete response without platelet recovery, n=5; morphological leukemia-free state, n=6). The extent of hypoxia was evaluated by the hypoxia tracer pimonidazole administered prior to a bone marrow biopsy and by immunohistochemical assessments of hypoxia-inducible factor alpha and carbonic anhydrase IX. A high fraction of leukemic cells expressed these markers, and PR104 administration resulted in measurable decrease of the proportions of hypoxic cells. These findings indicate that hypoxia is a prevalent feature of the leukemic microenvironment and that targeting hypoxia with hypoxia-activated prodrugs warrants further evaluation in acute leukemia. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01037556., (Copyright© Ferrata Storti Foundation.)

Many patients with non-Hodgkin (NHL) or Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) relapse or are refractory to initial therapy and require additional options. Bendamustine (B), lenalidomide (L) and rituximab (R) each have activity in this setting. This study was performed to determine the safety of BLR and its optimal phase II dose. Patients with NHL or HL failing standard therapies received B (90 mg/m(2)  days 1, 2 every 28 days), and L (escalating from 5 mg 21/28 days) for six cycles, followed by 6 months of L. At the highest dose R 375 mg/m(2) on day one of each cycle was added for patients with B-NHL. Histologies included diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, 11), marginal zone lymphoma (3), HL (2), and one each of transformed follicular lymphoma, Sézary syndrome, Waldenström macroglobulinaemia and mantle cell lymphoma. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3 and 4 toxicity, but no maximum tolerated dose was identified. Of 20 patients, seven responded (35%), including four complete remissions, with five unmaintained responses from 28+ to 37+ months, including 2 DLBCL. BR with 20 mg l at, 21/28 days achieved durable responses; however, in light of its modest activity, and the availability of newer targeted therapies, the future of BLR is uncertain., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Obinutuzumab is a type 2, glycoengineered, anti-CD20 antibody recently approved with chlorambucil for the initial therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In this nonrandomized, parallel-cohort, phase 1b, multicenter study, we explored the safety and preliminary efficacy of obinutuzumab-bendamustine (G-B) or obinutuzumab fludarabine cyclophosphamide (G-FC) for the therapy of previously untreated fit patients with CLL. Patients received up to 6 cycles of G-B (n = 20) or G-FC (n = 21). The primary end point was safety, with infusion-related reactions (88%, grade 3-4 20%) being the most common adverse event and grade 3-4 neutropenia in 55% on G-B and 48% on G-FC. Mean cycles completed were 5.7 for G-B and 5.1 for G-FC, with 2 and 7 early discontinuations, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) for G-B was 90% (18/20) with 20% complete response (CR) and 25% CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi). The ORR for G-FC was 62% (13/21), with 10% CR and 14% CRi, including 4 patients not evaluable. With a median follow-up of 23.5 months in the G-B cohort and 20.7 months in the G-FC cohort, no patient has relapsed or died. We conclude that obinutuzumab with either B or FC shows manageable toxicity and has promising activity. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01300247., (© 2015 by The American Society of Hematology.)

The efficacy/tolerability of bendamustine, a unique alkylator, plus ofatumumab, a human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, was evaluated for previously untreated indolent B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The study investigated whether the overall response rate (ORR) for bendamustine-ofatumumab was similar to historical bendamustine-rituximab ORRs (≥90 %). In this multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study, patients received six planned 28-day cycles of bendamustine (90 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 of each cycle) and ofatumumab (300 mg on day 1, 1000 mg on day 8 of cycle 1, and on day 1 of subsequent cycles). The primary outcome was ORR. Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability. Exploratory evaluations included percentage of patients with positive baseline [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans who converted to negative postbaseline and quality of life (QOL) scores. The treated/safety analysis population received ≥1 dose of either therapy. The bendamustine-ofatumumab ORR was 90 % (95 % confidence interval, 77.8-96.6) in 49 treated patients (67 % complete response, 22 % partial response). No patients had progressive disease. Bendamustine-ofatumumab was acceptably tolerated. All 49 patients had ≥1 adverse event, the most common being nausea (61 %), fatigue (55 %), and infusion-related reactions (45 %, all but 1 occurring during cycle 1). The proportion of patients whose FDG-PET scans converted to negative postbaseline was 88 %. Changes in QOL scores were minor. In patients with treatment-naive, indolent B cell NHL, bendamustine-ofatumumab exhibited a high degree of activity (90 % ORR), comparable with historical bendamustine-rituximab ORRs (≥90 %), and was adequately tolerated ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01108341).

Ibrutinib has single agent activity of 22% to 68% in relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma(NHL). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ibrutinib combined with rituximab (R) and bendamustine. Patients received R (375 mg/m(2)) on day 1, bendamustine (90 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 2, and ibrutinib (280 or 560 mg) on days 1 to 28 every 28 days for 6 cycles followed by ibrutinib alone until progression. Forty-eight patients enrolled, including 12 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), 16 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLCL), and 17 with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Patients received a median of 8 cycles, with 26 completing 6 cycles and continuing ibrutinib alone in cycles 7 to 34. The overall response (OR) rate was 72%, with 52% complete responses (CRs). By histology, the OR rate was 94% (76% CR) in MCL, 37% (31% CR) in DLCL, and 90% (50% CR) in FL. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities included lymphopenia (77%), neutropenia (33%), thrombocytopenia (19%), and rash (25%). Median progression-free survival has not been reached (95% CI, 8.7 months to not reached). The recommended phase 2 dose of ibrutinib in combination with R-bendamustine in patients with NHL is 560 mg. The combination has promising efficacy, particularly in MCL and FL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01479842., (© 2015 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Bendamustine is an alkylating agent approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. There are scant reports on bendamustine-induced immune hemolytic anemia occurring mainly in CLL patients. We report a case of immune hemolytic anemia that developed after exposure to bendamustine in a 70-year-old female with CLL who was previously exposed to fludarabine. Previous exposure to fludarabine is a common finding in the majority of reported cases of bendamustine drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA), including our case. Bendamustine should be suspected as the cause of any hemolytic anemia that develops while on this drug, especially in CLL patients treated previously with fludarabine., (Copyright © 2014 King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: CD37 is cell surface tetraspanin present on normal and malignant B cells. Otlertuzumab (TRU-016) is a novel humanized anti-CD37 protein therapeutic that triggers direct caspase independent apoptosis of malignant B cells and induces antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. This study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of otlertuzumab administered in combination with rituximab and bendamustine to patients with relapsed, indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)., Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory NHL received otlertuzumab (10 or 20 mg/kg) intravenously (IV) on days 1 and 15, bendamustine (90 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 2, and rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) on day 1 for up to six 28 day cycles. Responses were determined using standard criteria., Results: Twelve patients were treated with 6 patients at each dose level; median age was 57 years (range, 51-79), and median number of prior regimens was 3 (range, 1-4). All patients had relapsed after prior rituximab including 7 refractory to their most recent previous treatment. In the 10 and 20 mg/kg dose cohorts, the mean half-life was 8 and 10 days following the first dose, and 12 or 14 days following 12 doses of otlertuzumab, respectively. Overall response rate was 83% (10/12) with 4 CRs (32%). The most frequent adverse events were neutropenia, nausea, fatigue, leukopenia, and insomnia; most were grade 1 or 2., Conclusions: Otlertuzumab in combination with rituximab and bendamustine was well tolerated and induced responses in the majority of patients with relapsed indolent B-NHL. NCI Clinical Trials Network registration: NCT01317901.

The immune system has the potential to either attenuate tumor growth or to promote tumor progression. The goal of cancer immunotherapy is to shift the balance in favor of tumor immunosurveillance, so that the immune system can recognize the tumor, eliminate it, and prevent its recurrence. Bendamustine plus rituximab is generally considered effective and safe in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas. To evaluate the effects of bendamustine-rituximab and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) on the recuperation of immune system, we analyze the distribution of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells, and NK cells in peripheral blood of 18 patients who received 4-6 cycles of rituximab-bendamustine (BR) or six R-CHOP before therapy and 6 months after completing treatment. Our results indicate that lymphocyte recovery is impaired in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent lymphomas treated with bendamustine plus rituximab. Low CD4 T cells (<200 cells/μl) induced by bendamustine (BR) suggest prophylaxis should be applied against opportunistic infections. Asymptomatic EBV and CMV reactivations support a negative effect of BR on the immune system. If cellular immune therapy such as lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) or effector lymphocytes infusion is planned, regimes other than BR should be the first choice.

A phase I study was conducted to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase II dose of bendamustine with concurrent whole brain radiation (WBR) in patients with brain metastases (BM) from solid tumors. Four doses of intravenous weekly bendamustine were administered with 3 weeks of WBR at three dose levels (60, 80, and 100 mg/m(2)) according to a standard 3 + 3 phase I design. A total of 12 patients with solid tumor BM were enrolled in the study (six with non-small cell lung cancer, four with melanoma, one with breast cancer, and one with neuroendocrine carcinoma). The first two dose levels had three patients each, and the third dose level had six total patients. Plasma pharmacokinetic studies of bendamustine demonstrated no significant differences from pharmacokinetic characteristics of bendamustine in other studies. No DLTs were noted at any dose levels, and no grade 4 toxicities occurred. The MTD of weekly bendamustine with concurrent WBR was 100 mg/m(2). The majority of trial patients died from progressive systemic disease rather than their brain disease. The combination of weekly bendamustine with concurrent WBR was acceptably tolerated. The efficacy of this combination may be evaluated in a phase II trial with stratification by histologies.

This sixteenth biannual report of the Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group highlights recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the field of hemato-oncology, with special focus on non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The report covers the publication period June 2012 to July 2013. Trials are selected regarding their methodology and implication for clinical practice. Studies were identified by electronic search of MEDLINE using a broad search filter that covers all topics in hemato-oncology combined with a highly sensitive search filter for randomized trials (Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions). Four RCTs are presented in detail, followed by two further RCTs of high importance in a short version. The report is finalized with an overview of new and updated Cochrane Reviews., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Abstract This retrospective study compared adverse-event rates in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), with and without renal impairment, receiving bendamustine alone or with rituximab. Patients (n = 940) were stratified into a renally impaired group (creatinine clearance [CrCL] < 40 mL/min) and two comparator groups (CrCL ≥ 40 mL/min and CrCL ≥ 60 mL/min). Renally impaired patients with NHL had a significantly greater incidence of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia compared with the CrCL ≥ 60 mL/min group (hazard ratio [HR], 2.57; p = 0.025). For CLL and NHL together, grade 3-4 increased blood urea nitrogen was significantly higher in the renally impaired group than in the CrCL ≥ 40 mL/min (HR, 2.36; p = 0.02) and CrCL ≥ 60 mL/min (HR, 4.46; p = 0.001) groups. Based on these results, monitoring blood counts (including platelets) and renal function would be prudent in the management of patients with renal dysfunction and NHL or CLL who receive bendamustine-based regimens.

We studied the effects of three newly synthesized steroidal derivatives of nitrogen mustards, alone or in combination with caffeine, on sister chromatid exchange (SCE) frequencies and on human lymphocyte proliferation kinetics. The agents have as alkylator functionalities either P-N,N-bis(2-chloroethyl)aminophenyl-buturate (CHL) or P-N,N-bis(2-chloroethyl)aminophenyl-acetate (PHE), esterified with a modified steroidal nucleus. An enhancement of SCE frequency was seen with compounds which contain either PHE or CHL as alkylators and are esterified with a steroidal nucleus having added a cholestene group in the 17-position of the D-ring. The exocyclic insertion of an -NHCO- group in the D-ring of the steroidal nucleus esterified with PHE (amide ester of PHE) gave a compound showing increased SCE frequency. Enhanced cytogenetic damage was observed when lymphocytes were exposed in vitro to caffeine. The compounds, alone or in combination with caffeine, caused a concentration-dependent increase in SCE frequencies and cell division delays, and caffeine was found to act synergistically with the steroidal alkylators., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

This randomized, noninferiority (NI), global, phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) vs a standard rituximab-chemotherapy regimen (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone [R-CHOP] or rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone [R-CVP]) for treatment-naive patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or mantle cell lymphoma. Investigators preassigned the standard treatment regimen they considered most appropriate for each patient; patients were randomized to receive BR (n = 224) or standard therapy (R-CHOP/R-CVP, n = 223) for 6 cycles; 2 additional cycles were permitted at investigator discretion. Response was assessed by a blinded independent review committee. BR was noninferior to R-CHOP/R-CVP, as assessed by the primary end point of complete response rate (31% vs 25%, respectively; P = .0225 for NI [0.88 margin]). The overall response rates for BR and R-CHOP/R-CVP were 97% and 91%, respectively (P = .0102). Incidences of vomiting and drug-hypersensitivity reactions were significantly higher in patients treated with BR (P < .05), and incidences of peripheral neuropathy/paresthesia and alopecia were significantly higher in patients treated with standard-therapy regimens (P < .05). These data indicate BR is noninferior to standard therapy with regard to clinical response with an acceptable safety profile. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00877006.

This open-label, single-arm, phase I/II, dose-escalation study was designed to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and efficacy of bendamustine in pediatric patients (age ranging from 1 to 20 y) with histologically proven relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients (27 with ALL, 16 with AML) received intravenous bendamustine on days 1 and 2 of each treatment cycle. Phase I involved planned dose escalation of bendamustine to establish the RP2D for phase II. Objectives included overall response rate, duration of response, and tolerability. Eleven patients were treated in phase I, and the RP2D was 120 mg/m. In phase II, 32 patients received bendamustine 120 mg/m. Two patients with ALL (bendamustine 90 mg/m) experienced complete response (CR). Among patients who received bendamustine 120 mg/m, 2 experienced partial response (PR); 7 had stable disease. The overall response rate (CR+CR without platelet recovery [CRp]) was 4.7% and biological activity rate (CR+CRp+PR) was 9.3%. No AML patients responded. The most common adverse events were anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, pyrexia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Bendamustine monotherapy has acceptable tolerability in heavily pretreated children with relapsed/refractory ALL or AML and appears to have some activity in ALL, warranting further studies in combination trials.

A 40-year-old man was diagnosed with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) in October 2010. His LCH was refractory to conventional chemotherapy, and thus worsened to Langerhans cell sarcoma (LCS) in May 2011. Although we repeated combination chemotherapies, new infiltration of the liver and bone marrow, as well as primary lesions of the bone, lymph nodes, and skin, appeared. These intensive chemotherapies caused candida liver abscesses, invasive aspergillosis, disseminated varicella zoster virus infection and bacterial sepsis. We administered bendamustine for chemotherapy, which resulted in a partial response (PR) with no severe adverse events. Because of pancytopenia caused by secondary myelodysplastic syndrome, we stopped the bendamustine chemotherapy after two courses. PR was maintained for 4 months. We plan to perform allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a sibling donor after a conditioning regimen. Optimal therapy for adult LCH, which is a rare and treatment-resistant disease, has yet to be established. Bendamustine is a potential chemotherapeutic agent for standard treatment of LCS.

Patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are treated with salvage regimens and may be considered for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation if disease is chemosensitive. Bendamustine is active in indolent B cell lymphomas and chronic lymphocytic leukemia but has not been extensively studied in aggressive lymphomas. This trial examines the combination of bendamustine and rituximab in patients with relapsed and refractory DLBCL. Patients received bendamustine at 90 mg/m² (n = 2) or 120 mg/m² (n = 57) on days 1 and 2 and rituximab at 375 mg/m² on day 1 every 28 days for up to 6 cycles. The study evaluated objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment safety. Fifty-nine patients were treated, and 48 were evaluable for response. Median age was 74; 89 % had stage III or IV disease, and 63 % had high revised International Prognostic Index scores; the median number of prior therapies was 1. Based on analysis using the intent-to-treat population, the ORR was 45.8 % (complete response, 15.3 %; partial response, 30.5 %). The median DOR was 17.3 months, and the median PFS was 3.6 months. Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia (36 %), leukopenia (29 %), thrombocytopenia (22 %), and anemia (12 %). The combination of bendamustine and rituximab showed modest activity in patients with relapsed and refractory DLBCL and has an acceptable toxicity profile.

Bendamustine with bortezomib and dexamethasone was evaluated in 79 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Median age was 64 years, and patients had a median of 2 prior treatment lines (range, 1 to 6 lines). Bendamustine 70 mg/m(2) days 1 and 4; bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) intravenously days 1, 4, 8, and 11; and dexamethasone 20 mg days 1, 4, 8, and 11 once every 28 days was given for up to 8 cycles. Primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, time to response, and toxicity. ORR was 60.8%, and when minor responses were included, 75.9%. Median time to response was 31 days. ORR rate was similar in patients previously exposed to bortezomib, lenalidomide, and bortezomib plus lenalidomide. PFS was 9.7 and OS was 25.6 months. Multivariate analysis showed high lactate dehydrogenase, ≥3 prior treatment lines, and low platelet counts correlating with short survival. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was noted in 38%, and grade 3/4/5 infections were noted in 23%. Grade ≤2 polyneuropathy increased from 19% at baseline to 52% at cycle 8 and grade 4, from 0% to 7%. Bendamustine-bortezomib-dexamethasone is active and well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma. This trial was registered in the EudraCT database as No. 2008-006421-13.

Bendamustine is one of the new key drugs for patients with indolent lymphoma. Bendamustine, together with rituximab, significantly improves the treatment outcomes of these patients. In addition, previous clinical studies have shown the complication rate of severe infection in bendamustine-containing regimens to be relatively low as compared to those of conventional chemotherapeutic regimens such as CHOP. However, some clinical case reports have raised the possibility that bendamustine may abrogate the immune responses of patients and trigger opportunistic infections including cytomegalovirus reactivation. Herein, we report three indolent lymphoma cases becoming positive on cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay during bendamustine monotherapy. All events occurred after more than three courses of treatment with bendamustine. One patient showed decreased CD4 positive T lymphocytes before the development of cytomegalovirus antigenemia. All three patients were successfully treated with valganciclovir. Although the precise risk is unknown, it should be noted that bendamustine can potentially cause reactivation of/infection with cytomegalovirus and physicians should pay attention to the possibility of this infection during treatment with bendamustine-containing regimens.

Recently, the combination of rituximab and bendamustine (R-Benda) has been defined as highly active in patients with follicular lymphomas, but little is known about the efficacy of R-Benda in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. In a retrospective analysis, we have defined 14 patients with MALT lymphoma undergoing therapy with R-Benda. Seven patients were female and seven male (aged 44-88 years), and all had relapsed extragastric MALT lymphoma. R-Benda was given at first relapse in ten patients, while four patients had more than two prior forms of therapy. Bendamustine was given at a dose of 90 mg/m(2) on days 2 and 3 in ten patients and at 70 mg/m(2) in three patients, while all received 375 mg/m(2) rituximab on day 1. Ten patients received six courses of therapy, while two patients discontinued therapy after three, and one after four courses for personal reasons, while one patient had progressive disease after four courses. Tolerance of therapy was excellent, and all except one patient responded. Ten patients achieved a complete remission (CR) (71 %), three a partial remission (21 %), while one patient progressed. Toxicities were mild and mainly hematological but did not result in relevant delays or the necessity for dose reductions. After a median follow-up of 23 months (range, 4-42+), 13 patients are alive and one patient has relapsed 23 months after initial CR. Our data suggest high activity and good tolerance of R-Benda in patients with relapsed MALT lymphoma despite intensive pretreatment in some patients. In view of this, prospective studies are warranted.

This is the case of a 79-year-old man with chronic lymphocytic leukemia who presented with Guillain-Barré syndrome with features overlapping with the Miller Fisher syndrome and Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis and positive antiganglioside GQ1b antibody about 6 months after treatment with bendamustine and rituximab. His clinical and neurologic condition continued to deteriorate despite sequential treatment with corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis, but in the end, he had a complete and durable response to treatment with alemtuzumab.

Aim: To evaluate the efficiency and safety of monotherapy with bendamustine (B) and therapy with B in combination with rituximab (B + R) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) accompanied by renal failure (RF)., Subjects and Methods: The prospective pilot study included 8 patients (6 men, 2 women) with CLL concurrent with RF. The patients' median age was 63 years (51-77 years). The Binet classification stage of CLL corresponded to B in 2 cases and C in 6. The mean (± standard error) pretreatment concentration of creatinine was 218 ± 92 μmol/l and the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 33 ± 20 ml/min. The efficiency of monotherapy with B (n=5) and combination therapy with B + R (n=3) was evaluated. In progressive CLL, therapy was performed in specific treatment-naïve patients (n = 5) and in pretreated patients refractory to alkylating agents (cyclophosphan, chlorambucil) (n = 3). A total of cycles of B and B + R were carried out., Results: After B monotherapy, one of the 5 cases achieved a complete remission, 3 a partial remission, and 1 a nodular partial remission. Three patients developed recurrence. In the B monotherapy group, the cumulative risk of recurrence was 70% at a median follow-up of 22 months and at a maximum follow-up of 27 months. In the B + R therapy group, all the 3 patients achieved a complete remission. The median follow-up was 7 months; the maximum follow-up was 1 year. There were no deaths or recurrences. During B monotherapy and B + R combination therapy, there was improved kidney function: the mean concentration of creatinine decreased from 218 ± 92 to 140 ± 57 μmol/l (p < 0.05); GFR increased from 33 ± 20.0 to 54 ± 25 ml/min; the mean increment was 20 ml/min (p < 0.01). Mild and moderate anemia and thrombocytopenia were most common during B and B + R therapies. Neutropenia with mild infection complications, as well as nonhematologic complications were detected in some cases. The drugs were observed to have no nephrotoxic effects., Conclusion: The performed pilot prospective indicated that the B + R combination therapy was effective in patients with RF-associated CLL. No toxic effect of B on kidney function was seen. During B therapy, there was better kidney function manifesting itself as a statistically and clinically important decrease in creatinine concentrations and a statistically and clinically important increase in GFR as compared to the baseline values.

Purpose: To determine tolerability and for the first time explore efficacy of bendamustine-rituximab (BR) in multiply relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia (HCL), using two different dose levels of bendamustine., Experimental Design: Patients with HCL with ≥2 prior therapies requiring treatment received rituximab 375 mg/m(2) days 1 and 15 plus bendamustine 70 (n = 6) or 90 (n = 6) mg/m(2), days 1 and 2, for six cycles at 4-week intervals., Results: At 70 and 90 mg/m(2)/dose of bendamustine, overall response rate was 100%, with three (50%) and four (67%) complete remissions (CR) in each respective group. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was absent in 67% and 100% of CRs, respectively. All six without MRD remain in CR at 30 to 35 (median, 31) months of follow-up. Soluble CD22 and CD25 levels decreased with all responses, with median values decreasing from 17.7 and 42 ng/mL at baseline to undetectable and 2 ng/mL after CR, respectively (P < 0.001). Of 12 patients receiving 72 cycles of BR, the most common toxicities were hematologic, including thrombocytopenia (83%), lymphopenia (75%), leukopenia (58%), and neutropenia (42%). Grade III and IV hematologic toxicity included lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia (each 75%), leukopenia (58%), and neutropenia (25%). No significant dose-related differences were detected in response or toxicity., Conclusion: BR has significant activity in HCL. Bendamustine at either 70 or 90 mg/m(2)/dose was highly effective in multiply relapsed/refractory HCL and could be considered for achieving durable CRs without MRD in patients after failure of standard therapies. As it was not dose-limiting, 90 mg/m(2)/dose was chosen for future testing., (©2013 AACR.)

Limited data support the use of bendamustine in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of bendamustine in 28 patients with refractory HL or relapsed HL after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) used as part of a compassionate use program. The median number of therapies before bendamustine was 5 (3-8). ASCT and non-myeloablative allogeneic transplant were previously performed for 25 and six patients, respectively. The median number of bendamustine cycles administered was 3 (1-12). The objective response rate was 50% with complete response (CR) in 29% of patients. The median progression-free survival was 5.7 months, and 10.2 months in patients with CR. During the first six cycles, two patients had a febrile neutropenia and four patients had grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. Bendamustine was effective in these highly pretreated patients with HL. It might be used earlier in the treatment strategy of HL and in combination with other active drugs.

Bendamustine proved to be effective for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, the relationship between its activity with clinico-biological prognosticators has been addressed only in few studies. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of bendamustine, in a real-life contest, on 142 patients, median age 70 years, median number of previous regimens 2 (0-8, 13% previously untreated). Bendamustine was administered for a median number of 4 cycles, in 84% of cases with rituximab. Overall (ORR) and complete response (CRR) rates were 68 and 16.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a relationship between ORR and number of prior treatments (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.71; P = 0.009), del(17p) (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.03-0.32; P < 0.001) and concomitant rituximab (OR 4.37, 95% CI 1.12-17.04; P = 0.033). The estimated 1- and 2-years overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) rates were 76, 61, 51, and 26%, respectively. Previous sensitivity to fludarabine (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16-0.82), response to bendamustine (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.10-0.45), and del(17p) (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.002-4.74) had a prognostic significance in multivariate analysis for PFS, while the number of previous therapies (HR 3.48, 95% CI 1.29-9.38; P = 0.014), concomitant use of rituximab (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11-0.93) and response to bendamustine (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.66) were significant for OS. Side effects included grade 3-4 neutropenia, infections, thrombocytopenia and anemia which occurred in 40, 14, 14, and 10% of patients, respectively. These results confirm the activity and safety of bendamustine and rituximab combination even in patients with unfavorable clinical and biological features excluding del(17p)., (Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Introduction: Serious renal failure represents a severe complication of multiple myeloma (MM), with an estimated 25-50 % of patients being affected. Both bortezomib and bendamustine have been identified as quickly acting, effective and well-tolerated drugs and might therefore constitute an adequate combination regimen for patients presenting with light chain-induced renal failure., Methods: Between March 2005 and March 2013, 36 patients with relapsed/refractory MM and light chain-induced renal failure (creatinine clearance <60 ml/min) were treated with bendamustine 60 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 and prednisone 100 mg on days 1, 2, 4, 8 and 11 (BPV). Patients were divided according to severity of renal impairment into group A (n = 20) with moderate or severe renal dysfunction (eGFR 15-59 ml/min) and group B (n = 16) with renal failure/dialysis (eGFR <15 ml/min)., Results: Twenty-four patients (67 %) responded with three CR, three nCR, six VGPR and 12 PR. Six patients had minor response, two stable and four progressive disease. With a median follow-up period of 22 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients of group A were 10 and 25 months, respectively. This outcome was significantly better compared to patients of group B with a median PFS and OS of 3 and 7 months, respectively. Eleven patients showed a CRrenal, five a PRrenal and 15 a MRrenal. These results indicate that this BPV combination is feasible, effective and well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory MM and light chain-induced renal failure.

Follicular lymphoma consists of a heterogeneous group of diseases that can vary dramatically in clinical course. As with other indolent lymphomas, follicular lymphoma is felt to be highly treatable, but ultimately incurable. The appropriate management of this disease ranges from close observation to chemoimmunotherapy based on presenting symptoms and comorbidities. In this article, we focus on the optimal management of follicular lymphoma, including prognostication, indications for treatment, and current treatment options. While a number of front-line chemoimmunotherapy options exist, R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) and BR (bendamustine, rituximab) tend to be favored due to efficacy and tolerability. Post-induction options include maintenance rituximab and radioimmunotherapy, but neither has demonstrated an overall survival benefit. In relapsed disease, patients can receive an alternative chemoimmunotherapy regimen or radioimmunotherapy, or participate in a clinical trial. There are a number of new biologic targeted therapies with promising activity in follicular lymphoma that have the potential to change our approach to this disease.

Purpose: Immune hemolytic anemia (IHA) may complicate the course of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), especially in patients with advanced disease, and as a complication of treatment with chlorambucil or fludarabine. Bendamustine, a novel agent with both alkylating and purine-analog properties, was approved in the USA for use in CLL in 2008. Since then, clinical data on its adverse events are accumulating. IHA related to bendamustine was seldom described and is thus reported and reviewed., Methods: We assessed five cases of CLL patients complicated by IHA, out of 31 treated with bendamustine for a relapse of their disease. Also reviewed are previous case reports in the literature., Results and Conclusions: Bendamustine-related IHA is more common than suspected (16 %). No such cases were found in non-CLL patients. Personal history of fludarabine-triggered AIHA may be a risk factor for this complication (recorded in 4/5 patients, 80 %). The mechanism is thought to be related to the loss of T cell regulatory control as described for other agents. Physicians using bendamustine for the treatment for CLL should be aware of this complication.

This phase I trial was designed to develop a new effective and well-tolerated regimen for patients with aggressive B cell lymphoma not eligible for front-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy or aggressive second-line treatment strategies. The combination of rituximab (375 mg/m(2) on day 1), bendamustine (70 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2), and lenalidomide was tested with a dose escalation of lenalidomide at three dose levels (10, 15, or 20 mg/day) using a 3 + 3 design. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks. The recommended dose was defined as one level below the dose level identifying ≥2/6 patients with a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first cycle. Thirteen patients were eligible for analysis. Median age was 77 years. WHO performance status was 0 or 1 in 12 patients. The Charlson Comorbidity Index showed relevant comorbidities in all patients. Two DLTs occurred at the second dose level (15 mg/day) within the first cycle: one patient had prolonged grade 3 neutropenia, and one patient experienced grade 4 cardiac adverse event (myocardial infarction). Additional grade 3 and 4 toxicities were as follows: neutropenia (31 %), thrombocytopenia (23 %), cardiac toxicity (31 %), fatigue (15 %), and rash (15 %). The dose of lenalidomide of 10 mg/day was recommended for a subsequent phase II in combination with rituximab 375 mg/m(2) on day 1 and bendamustine 70 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2.

This phase 1 dose finding study tested a combination of lenalidomide, bendamustine and prednisolone (RBP) in 21 patients in five cohorts with advanced multiple relasped/refractory myeloma (MM) to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of the combination. The first cohort received a starting dose of lenalidomide 10 mg/d, days 1-21, bendamustine 60 mg/m(2) /d, days 1-2, and prednisolone 100 mg/d, days 1-4. Dose escalation was done in cohorts of three to six patients with lenalidomide dose increasing to 15, 20 and 25 mg, and after reaching 25 mg/d, bendamustine was increased to 75 mg/m(2) . A total of 21 patients were enrolled and all completed at least two cycles. Two patients developed dose-limiting haemotoxicity: one patient on lenalidomide 25 mg/d and bendamustine 60 mg/m(2) and another patient at the highest dose level (lenalidomide 25 mg/d and bendamustine 75 mg/m(2) ). The MTD was not reached. Sixteen patients (76%) responded after at least two cycles of RBP with one stringent complete response (CR), one near CR, five very good partial response and nine partial response. After a median observation time of 16 months, progression-free survival at 18 months was 48% and overall survival was 64%. In conclusion, RBP with lenalidomide 25 mg/d, days 1-21 and bendamustine 75 mg/m(2) days 1-2 is well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory MM., (© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Effective and less aggressive therapies are required for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who are not eligible for or have undergone autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). The present phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in this population., Patients and Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL treated with one to three prior chemotherapy regimens received rituximab 375 mg/m(2) intravenous (IV) infusion on day 1 and bendamustine 120 mg/m(2) by IV infusion on days 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for up to six cycles. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR), and the secondary end points were complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety., Results: Sixty-three patients were enrolled, and 59 received BR. The median age was 67 years (range, 36 to 75 years), and 62.7% of patients were 65 years of age or older. Fifty-seven patients (96.6%) were previously treated with rituximab-containing chemotherapy. The ORR was 62.7% (95% CI, 49.1% to 75.0%), with a CR rate of 37.3% (95% CI, 25.0% to 50.9%). The ORRs were comparable between patients ≥ 65 years of age and less than 65 years (62.2% and 63.6%, respectively). The median PFS was 6.7 months (95% CI, 3.6 to 13.7 months). The most frequently observed grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hematologic: lymphopenia (78.0%), neutropenia (76.3%), leukopenia (72.9%), CD4 lymphopenia (66.1%), and thrombocytopenia (22.0%)., Conclusion: BR is a promising salvage regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL after rituximab-containing chemotherapy, warranting further investigation.

Indolent lymphoma is one of the most frequently occurring subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Indolent NHL has a long natural history, and patients will likely receive multiple therapies during the course of their disease. Treatment options are rapidly evolving and, because oncology nurses play a major role in managing patients undergoing treatment for indolent NHL, they need to be aware of the potential adverse effects associated with new therapies that may affect patients in their care. One such agent is bendamustine, which was approved by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration in 2008 for the treatment of relapsed indolent NHL. Oncology nurses are increasingly likely to encounter bendamustine either as monotherapy or in combination with rituximab. Bendamustine is a hybrid agent with both alkylating and purine analog properties, produces a high response rate in patients with indolent NHL, and has manageable side effects that include immunosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity, and fatigue. Oncology nurses should be familiar with the common side effects so as to provide enhanced care for the patient receiving this agent. This article reviews the safety profile of bendamustine and discusses the implications from a nursing perspective.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a heterogeneous group of B-cell neoplasm. CLL is typically sensitive to a variety of cytotoxic agents, but relapse frequently occurs with conventional approaches. The treatment of CLL is evolving rapidly with the introduction of novel drugs, such as bendamustine, ofatumumab, lenalidomide, ibrutinib, idelalisib, veltuzumab, XmAb5574, navitoclax, dasatinib, alvespimycin, and TRU-016. This review summarizes the most current clinical experiences with these agents in the treatment of CLL.

Purpose: The combination of bendamustine (B) and rituximab (R) is efficacious, with favorable toxicity in mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL). In this phase II study, we combined cytarabine with R and B (R-BAC) in patients with MCL age ≥ 65 years who were previously untreated or relapsed or refractory (R/R) after one prior immunochemotherapy treatment., Patients and Methods: In stage one, we established the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of cytarabine in R-BAC. In stage two, patients received R (375 mg/m(2) intravenously [IV] on day 1), B (70 mg/m(2) IV on days 2 and 3), and cytarabine (MTD IV on days 2 to 4) every 28 days for four to six cycles. The primary end point (overall response rate [ORR]) was evaluated by positron emission tomography. Secondary end points included safety, progression-free survival (PFS), response duration, and overall survival., Results: Forty patients (median age, 70 years; 20 previously untreated patients) were enrolled; 93% had Ann Arbor stage III/IV disease; 49% had high Mantle Cell International Prognostic Index scores, with 15% blastoid histology. All R/R patients (35% refractory) had previously received R-containing regimens. The cytarabine MTD used in stage two was 800 mg/m(2), and R-BAC was well tolerated, with an 85% treatment completion rate. The major toxicity was transient grades 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia (87% of patients); febrile neutropenia occurred in 12%. The ORR was 100% (95% complete response [CR]) for previously untreated and 80% (70% CR) for R/R patients. The 2-year PFS rate (± standard deviation) was 95% ± 5% for untreated and 70% ± 10% for R/R patients., Conclusion: R-BAC is well tolerated and active against MCL.

Background: Rituximab plus chemotherapy, most often CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), is the first-line standard of care for patients with advanced indolent lymphoma, and for elderly patients with mantle-cell lymphoma. Bendamustine plus rituximab is effective for relapsed or refractory disease. We compared bendamustine plus rituximab with CHOP plus rituximab (R-CHOP) as first-line treatment for patients with indolent and mantle-cell lymphomas., Methods: We did a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial at 81 centres in Germany between Sept 1, 2003, and Aug 31, 2008. Patients aged 18 years or older with a WHO performance status of 2 or less were eligible if they had newly diagnosed stage III or IV indolent or mantle-cell lymphoma. Patients were stratified by histological lymphoma subtype, then randomly assigned according to a prespecified randomisation list to receive either intravenous bendamustine (90 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 of a 4-week cycle) or CHOP (cycles every 3 weeks of cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2), and vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) on day 1, and prednisone 100 mg/day for 5 days) for a maximum of six cycles. Patients in both groups received rituximab 375 mg/m(2) on day 1 of each cycle. Patients and treating physicians were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, with a non-inferiority margin of 10%. Analysis was per protocol. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00991211, and the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices of Germany, BfArM 4021335., Findings: 274 patients were assigned to bendamustine plus rituximab (261 assessed) and 275 to R-CHOP (253 assessed). At median follow-up of 45 months (IQR 25-57), median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the bendamustine plus rituximab group than in the R-CHOP group (69.5 months [26.1 to not yet reached] vs 31.2 months [15.2-65.7]; hazard ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.74; p<0.0001). Bendamustine plus rituximab was better tolerated than R-CHOP, with lower rates of alopecia (0 patients vs 245 (100%) of 245 patients who recieved ≥3 cycles; p<0.0001), haematological toxicity (77 [30%] vs 173 [68%]; p<0.0001), infections (96 [37%] vs 127 [50%]); p=0.0025), peripheral neuropathy (18 [7%] vs 73 [29%]; p<0.0001), and stomatitis (16 [6%] vs 47 [19%]; p<0.0001). Erythematous skin reactions were more common in patients in the bendamustine plus rituximab group than in those in the R-CHOP group (42 [16%] vs 23 [9%]; p=0.024)., Interpretation: In patients with previously untreated indolent lymphoma, bendamustine plus rituximab can be considered as a preferred first-line treatment approach to R-CHOP because of increased progression-free survival and fewer toxic effects., Funding: Roche Pharma AG, Ribosepharm/Mundipharma GmbH., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Bortezomib (Velcade) is a proteasome inhibitor that has shown important clinical efficacy either as a single agent or in combination with other cytostatic agents in multiple myeloma (MM). In the present protocol, bortezomib was combined with other active substances like bendamustine and prednisone (BPV), in order to assess the efficacy and toxicity of the combination therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory MM., Methods: Between January 2005 and December 2011, 78 patients with relapsed or refractory MM were treated with bendamustine 60 (-120) mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8 and 11, and prednisone 100 mg on days 1, 2, 4, 8 and 11. The median number of prior therapies was 2 with a wide range of 1-9. Thirty-three patients had pre-existing severe thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia (WHO grade 3 or 4)., Results: A median number of two (range 1-7) BPV treatment cycles were given to the patients. The majority of the patients (n = 54; 69 %) responded after at least one cycle of chemotherapy with 3 CR, 10 nCR, 10 VGPR and 31 PR. Median PFS and OS for patients without severe hematological toxicities due to previous treatments (n = 45) were 11 and 50 months, respectively. Outcome for these patients was significantly better than that for patients with severe hematological toxicities (grade 3 or 4, n = 33) with a PFS, and OS of 3 months (p < 0.05) and 5 months (p < 0.001), respectively. The regimen was well tolerated with few significant side effects in patients without severe hematological toxicities due to previous treatments. These results indicate that the combination of bortezomib, bendamustine and prednisone is well tolerated in patients with relapsed or refractory MM.

We investigated the safety and efficacy of 90 mg/m(2) bendamustine HCL, administered intravenously on days 1 and 2 every 28 days in 10 women with platinum and taxane resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. There were no objective tumor responses observed; 2 patients had stable disease. Plasma samples collected at pre-treatment and end of cycle one were analyzed for changes in circulating total cytokeratin 18 and caspase cleaved cytokeratin 18 as exploratory early biomarkers of bendamustine-induced tumor cell death. All patients had measureable levels of both total and cleaved caspase 3 cytokeratin 18, but no relationship with response was possible due to the lack of clinical benefit in treated patients. Due to the high incidence of adverse events and absence of objective responses, only ten patients were treated as predefined by the Simon Two-Stage Design in the protocol. Overall, the regimen was not well tolerated and was associated with fatigue and a greater number of gastrointestinal side effects as compared to previously reported experiences in different patient populations. However, our study subjects did experience less bone marrow suppression. The lack of tolerability could reflect the degree of tumor burden within the peritoneal cavity as well as the high number of prior regimens (median of 5) received by the patients participating in this study.

Purpose: Limited data exist regarding the activity of bendamustine in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). This phase II study evaluated the efficacy of bendamustine in relapsed and refractory HL., Patients and Methods: Patients with relapsed and refractory HL who were ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT), or for whom this treatment failed, received bendamustine 120 mg/m(2) as a 30-minute infusion on days 1 and 2 every 28 days with growth factor support. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). A secondary end point was referral rate to allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (alloSCT) for patients deemed eligible for alloSCT at the time of enrollment., Results: Of the 36 patients enrolled, 34 were evaluable for response. Patients had received a median of four prior treatments, and 75% had relapsed after ASCT. The ORR by intent-to-treat analysis was 53%, including 12 complete responses (33%) and seven partial responses (19%). The response rate among evaluable patients was 56%. Responses were seen in patients with prior refractory disease, prior ASCT, and prior alloSCT; however, no responses were seen in patients who relapsed within 3 months of ASCT. The median response duration was 5 months. Five patients (20% of those eligible) proceeded to alloSCT after treatment with bendamustine. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were infrequent and most commonly included thrombocytopenia (20%), anemia (14%), and infection (14%)., Conclusion: This study confirms the efficacy of bendamustine in heavily pretreated patients with HL. These results support current and future studies evaluating bendamustine combinations in relapsed and refractory HL.

The management of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) recurring after stem cell transplantation (SCT) and multiply relapsed disease remains challenging. We report on 41 such patients who received bendamustine hydrochloride, a bifunctional mechlorethamine derivative mechanistically unrelated to traditional alkylators, after a median of four prior chemotherapy lines, including SCT in 85% of cases. Bendamustine was given at doses of 90-120 mg/m(2) every 21 or 28 d. At first assessment (2-4 cycles), the overall response rate (ORR) was 78% with 12 (29%) complete (CR) and 20 (49%) partial responses (PR). Upon treatment prolongation to 6-8 courses, 40% of PRs progressed, yielding a final ORR of 58% with 31% of CRs. Eight patients (two CRs, six PRs) were subsequently allotransplanted. Median progression-free and overall survival exceeded 11 and 21 months respectively; complete responders displayed a median disease-free survival above 9 months with a relapse rate of only 30%. Outcomes were independent of disease chemosensitivity, previous transplant and bendamustine dose-intensity. No life-threatening or unexpected adverse events occurred. Within the limits of a retrospective analysis and schedule heterogeneity, these results appear very encouraging and prompt prospective trials to confirm bendamustine as a valuable option in the palliative setting and in cytoreductive strategies before allotransplantation., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Background/aim: In this study, we carried out a retrospective analysis of the efficacy and toxicity of bendamustine in patients with B-cell lymphoproliferative diseases., Methods: Bendamustine was administered both as monotherapy and in combined protocols to 92 patients, including 76 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and 16 patients with indolent lymphomas. Bendamustine plus rituximab was used to treat 65.2% of the patients, and 34.8% of the patients received bendamustine as monotherapy., Results: The overall response rate was 64.2%, including the complete response rate (18.5%) and the partial response rate (45.7%). The median overall survival (OS) was 11.5 months. Among the pretreatment parameters, β₂-microglobulin (RR = 1.413; p = 0.001) and hemoglobin levels (RR = 0.85; p = 0.03) significantly influenced survival. The OS was significantly longer in patients who received ≤2 lines of previous therapy compared to >3 lines (p = 0.043; log-rank test) and those who received ≥4 courses of therapy with bendamustine (p = 0.0007; log-rank test). Toxicity was predominantly hematological, including grade III/IV neutropenia in 33.7%, thrombocytopenia in 13%, and anemia in 13% of patients., Conclusion: Bendamustine, both in monotherapy and in combination regimens, is an effective therapy with a favorable toxicity profile in patients with indolent B-cell malignancies., (© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.)