Search

Background: This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness and safety profiles of current combination therapies based on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for the heterogeneous population of individuals with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC)., Methods: We retrieved pertinent literature from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and international conference databases. The study was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023453853) for transparency., Results: Our analysis included 20 RCTs involving 14,995 patients, evaluating 15 ADT-based combinations, including systemic therapies, radiotherapy and surgery. In the overall population, the darolutamide triplet (DARO + docetaxel + ADT) demonstrated comparable overall survival (OS) benefits to prostatectomy/radical local therapy (RLT) plus ADT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-1.57). Additionally, the enzalutamide (ENZ) triplet (ENZ + DOC + ADT) appeared to confer the best progression-free survival (HR, 0.34; 95% CI: 0.27-0.43). Subgroup analysis based on metastatic burden indicated that RLT plus ADT had the best OS performance in patients with low burden, while the DARO triplet was associated with the best OS in patients with high burden. Regarding adverse events (AEs), the addition of certain androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) agents to ADT led to an increased incidence of severe AEs, while the addition of DOC to the ARPI doublet did not appear to elevate the exposure-adjusted incidence rates., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that combined treatments result in better survival outcomes than does ADT alone. In the current landscape of systemic therapy, the significance of local therapy should not be underestimated, and therapeutic decisions should be tailored with meticulous consideration of clinical heterogeneity among patients., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

The effectiveness of a visceral leishmaniasis (VL) control strategy based on the application of 4 % deltamethrin impregnated collars (DIC) exclusively in seropositive dogs was assessed between 2018 and 2019, through a prospective study. The effectiveness of DIC-collaring was evaluated by comparing the incidence rate of anti-leishmanial antibodies among dogs from two endemic districts in Brazil. In one of the areas, the conventional control measure which is based on the non-compulsory euthanasia of LV seropositive dogs, was practiced by the official healthy service as a regular procedure, whereas strategic collaring, conceived in this study, was carried out in the other. Results of serological tests applied to serum samples collected from all domiciled dogs were evaluated in three consecutive times, spaced by around 200 days. Incidence rates of VL seroreactivity were compared between districts in the same period of time as well as within the same district, in consecutive periods. Based on the results, the risk of infection in the population under conventional control measure was up to four times higher than the risk of infection where DIC-collaring was used. The strategic use of collar proposed here emerged as a promising measure for VL control in dogs from endemic areas. Strategic collaring does not rely on the euthanasia of infected animals, an extremely controversial procedure, and instead of being used in all dogs, as collaring is normally recommended; only seropositive dogs are intervened. Strategic use of DIC has the potential to drastically reduce costs, if compared to mass collaring canine population., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Nanotechnology has the potential to reduce drug dosage while increasing efficacy; thus, the current work intends to synthesize diclazuril nanoemulsion and assess its performance against experimental coccidiosis in broilers., Methods: Diclazuril nanoemulsion (DZN) was formulated and characterized by zeta seizer and zeta potential. The formulated DZN was evaluated in vivo against Eimeria tenella infected chicks. DZN and DZ were used in 2 programs; therapeutic and prophylactic. A total of 210 one-day-old broiler chicks were distributed equally into six groups. The controls were negative uninfected untreated and positive infected untreated (G1 & G2). Therapeutic groups (G3 & G4) treated by DZ and DZN after appearance of the clinical signs of coccidiosis and continued for 5 days. Prophylaxis groups (G5 & G6) received DZ and DZN at 3 days before challenge and continued for 5 days after infection. The treatments dosages were 10 mg/mL for DZ of commercial origin and 2.5 mg/mL for the prepared DZN. All groups (except negative control) orally infected then followed up for clinical signs of coccidiosis, mortality rate, oocysts count, performance, hematological and biochemical parameters in addition to histopathological lesions., Results: The therapeutic groups showed that both treated groups (DZ and DZN) revealed similar results including good body weight gain, a low lesion caecal score, a low daily and total oocyst shedding count, and a low mortality rate. Regarding the biochemical parameters, all parameters were affected during infection then restored after the 12th day post infection. However, in the prophylactic groups, showed mild clinical signs and the blood pictures and biochemical parameters were nearly like the control negative without infection., Conclusion: DZN at a quarter dose of standard DZ produced the same outcomes as DZ at 10 mg/mL. Furthermore, DZN does not impair the typical safety of diclazuril in treated chicks., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic and progressive neurological autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system. There are two types of drugs used to treat this disease: injectable and oral drugs. The present study aimed at systematically reviewing the cost effectiveness of oral versus injectable drugs., Methods: The researchers searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to find relevant studies. After removing the duplicates, two authors independently assessed the records. The studies that had conducted full economic evaluations of oral versus injectable drugs in MS patients were included. The Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) tool was also used to assess the quality of the studies., Results: Thirty studies that had conducted the economic analysis of oral versus injectable therapies in MS patients were included in this review. The QHES scores for all records were generally high (≥ 77) and they were of good quality. The lowest and highest levels of incremental net monetary benefit were respectively obtained through the comparison of Fingolimod and Alemtuzumab (-1,419,333) and the comparison of Teriflunomide and Interferon β-1a (1,792,810). The amount of INMB (incremental net monetary benefit) in the comparisons between oral and injectable drugs showed that the highest and lowest amount of INMB calculated between) Fingolimod and injectable drugs, respectively, compared to (interferon β-1a) 98,253 and (Ocrelizumab) -212,417, the highest amount in dimethyl fumarate is also against (peginterferon β-1a) 191,470 and the lowest against (alemtuzumab) -124,333, Teriflunomide against injectable drugs is the highest against (peginterferon β-1a) 89,956 and the lowest (Ocrelizumab) - 194,169, as well as Cladribine compared to injectable drugs, the highest was compared to (interferon β-1a) 236,430 and the lowest (Ocrelizumab) was 23,965., Conclusion: A large number of health economic evaluations of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in MS were available at the international level, the comparison of which was difficult and sometimes contradictory. However, despite the difference in the results, Cladribine tablets were cost-effective in all studies compared with injectable drugs. In addition, the present study could be of great importance for policymakers and other beneficiaries regarding the cost-effectiveness of the aforementioned drugs., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Non-motor symptoms (NMS) are important factors when selecting treatments for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). We sought to elucidate the prescribing practices for advanced PD patients with NMS in Japanese clinical practice., Methods: We examined the prescription rates and doses of anti-PD drugs, and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in post hoc analyses of a 52-week observational study of 996 PD patients with wearing-off on levodopa-containing therapy and ≥1 NMS., Results: Dopamine agonists were the most frequently prescribed drugs combined with levodopa-containing drugs, followed by entacapone, zonisamide, istradefylline, selegiline, and amantadine. The daily dose of levodopa-containing drugs, rotigotine, entacapone, istradefylline, and droxidopa, and the levodopa-equivalent dose increased during the observation period. In a subgroup analysis of patients stratified by NMS status (improved/unchanged/deteriorated), the deteriorated group had higher prescription rates of entacapone and istradefylline, whereas the improved group had higher prescription rates of NSAIDs and zonisamide at Week 52. Prescriptions varied by geographical region for anti-PD drugs and by NMS status for NSAIDs., Conclusions: There were significant changes in the prescriptions and dosing of selected anti-PD drugs, especially newer drugs. Anti-PD drug and NSAID prescriptions also varied by changes in NMS status and geographic region., Competing Interests: Masahiro Nomoto reported research funds from Kyowa Kirin in relation to this study; and reported employment by The Social Welfare Organization Imperial Gift Foundation Inc. Saiseikai Imabari Hospital; honoraria from Ehime University, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Kirin, Eisai, and Ono Pharmaceutical; consultancies for Kissei Pharmaceutical and SNLD; and has served on advisory boards for the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency and Ehime Prefecture. Yoshio Tsuboi reported research funds from Kyowa Kirin in relation to this study; and reported lecture fees from Sumitomo Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Novartis Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Eisai; and contributes to courses organized by SUNWELS and Nipro Corporation. Kenichi Kashihara reported research funds from Kyowa Kirin in relation to this study; and reported employment by Okayama Neurology Clinic; and honoraria from Kyowa Kirin, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Sumitomo Pharma, FP Corporation, AbbVie GK, and Eisai. Shih-Wei Chiu reported research funds from Kyowa Kirin in relation to this study. Tetsuya Maeda reported research funds from Kyowa Kirin in relation to this study; and reported lecture fees and scholarship donations from Sumitomo Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Ono Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, and Japan Medtronic; lecture fees from AbbVie, FP Corporation, Biogen, and Chugai Pharmaceutical; scholarship donations from Bayer Yakuhin, Teijin, and CSL Behring; and consulting fees from Kyowa Kirin and Ono Pharmaceutical. Hidemoto Saiki reported editorial support from Kyowa Kirin in relation to this study; and reported honoraria from Eisai, Sumitomo Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Medtronic Japan; and grants from Otsuka Pharmaceutical and PDRadiopharma Inc. Hirohisa Watanabe reported research funds from Kyowa Kirin in relation to this study; and reported honoraria from Takeda Pharmaceutical, AbbVie, Kyowa Kirin, Sumitomo Pharma, Novartis Pharma, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, and FP Corporation. Yasushi Shimo reported honoraria from Takeda Pharmaceutical, Abbott Japan, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Medtronic Japan, Kyowa Kirin, Eisai, MDS, Boston Scientific Japan, Sumitomo Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Nihon Medi-Physics, and EA Pharma; and a grant from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS KAKENHI no. 21K07282). Nobutaka Hattori reported research grants, support for attending advisory boards, and support for a joint research department from Kyowa Kirin; and reported research contracts with Sumitomo Pharma and CellSource; consultancy fees from PARKINSON Laboratories; honoraria from Sumitomo Pharma, AbbVie, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Novartis Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, FP Pharmaceutical, Eisai, and Daiichi Sankyo; support for attending advisory boards from Sumitomo Pharma, Novartis Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation; support for an endowed department from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, FP Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, and Meiji Seika Pharma; support for a joint research department from Kyowa Kirin, Sumitomo Pharma, Parkinson Laboratories, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Nihon Medi-Physics, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, and Sunwels; scholarship donations from FP Pharmaceutical; holds stock in Parkinson Laboratories; honoraria for a team leader role at RIKEN Center for Brain Science; and is a coauthor on patent applications by Juntendo University. Takuhiro Yamaguchi reported grants from Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Solasia Pharma, Japan Tobacco Inc., Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, and Cordis Corporation; and personal fees from Intellim Corporation, Chugai Pharmaceutical, SONIRE Therapeutics Inc., Merck and Co Inc., EPS Corporation, Japan Tobacco Inc., Ono Pharmaceutical, Kowa Company, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, 3H Clinical Trial Inc., and Incyte Biosciences Japan. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2024 Nomoto et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Managing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in men aged ≥ 75 is challenging due to limited data. Regardless of age, in real-world clinical practice, most mCRPC still derive from failure of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without docetaxel (D) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). As abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA) and enzalutamide (Enza) are common first-line treatments for mCRPC. The impact of prior use of D for mCSPC on the efficacy and safety of AA or Enza in this older population remains unclear., Methods: A cohort of patients aged ≥ 75 years starting AA or Enza as first-line therapy for mCRPC from January 2015 to April 2019 was identified from the registries of 10 institutions. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on previous use of D for mCSPC. Primary endpoints were cancer-specific survival (CSS) from AA or Enza start, CSS from ADT onset, and safety. We used Kaplan-Meier method to estimate the endpoints distribution, including median values with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI)., Results: Of the 337 patients identified, 24 (7.1%) received ADT+D and 313 (92.9%) received ADT alone for mCSPC. Median follow-up from AA/Enza start was 18.8 months. Median CSS from ADT or AA/Enza was not significantly different between ADT+D and ADT alone cohorts (71.9 vs. 52.7 months, P = .97; 25.4 vs. 27.2 months, P = .89, respectively). No statistically significant difference in adverse events (AEs) of any grade rate (58.3% vs. 52.1%, respectively; P = .67) or grade ≥ 3 (12.5% vs. 15.7%, respectively; P = 1.0) was found between ADT+D and ADT alone cohorts., Conclusions: Despite the innate limitations of a retrospective design and relatively small size of the ADT+D cohort, this analysis suggests that elderly men receiving AA or Enza as first-line therapy for mCRPC have similar survival outcomes and tolerability, regardless of previous D for mCSPC., Competing Interests: Disclosure Loana Valenca received consulting fees from Janssen and travel grants from Janssen, Astellas, and Bayer. The other authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This retrospective observational study explored the therapeutic potential of combined androgen blockade (CAB) with bicalutamide (Bic-CAB) as an initial treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in Japan., Methods: The electronic health records of 159 patients with mHSPC from three Japanese institutions who received initial treatment with Bic-CAB between 2007 and 2017 were analyzed. The time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, duration of Bic-CAB treatment, and overall survival (OS), with various definitions for PSA progression, were assessed. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was constructed using clinical parameters to predict time to the end of Bic-CAB treatment and OS., Results: The median observation period was 46.4 months, and the median age of patients at diagnosis was 71 years. A total of 46.5% patients experienced PSA progression with a median survival duration of 29 months (according to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 criteria), and 49.1% patients achieved a PSA nadir < 0.2 ng/mL in a median time of 4.7 months. When stratified by PSA nadir and PSA change, patients at low risk for disease progression with a small PSA change due to low initial PSA had a 5-year OS of 100% and a 10-year OS of 75%. The OS during the observation period was 72.9 months., Conclusion: These findings highlight the potential effect of Bic-CAB in patients with mHSPC who were at low risk for disease progression. Initial treatment with Bic-CAB and adjusting treatment early based on PSA dynamics may be a reasonable treatment plan for these patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Although bosutinib is generally safe and effective, drug-related toxicities (DRTs) such as diarrhea or increased transaminase levels often lead to treatment discontinuation. To clarify whether a lower initial dose of bosutinib (i.e., starting at 200 mg) would reduce rates of discontinuation due to DRTs, we conducted a phase 2 study of BOsutinib Gradual Increase (BOGI trial, UMIN 000032282) as a second/third-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Between February 4, 2019 and May 24, 2022, 35 patients were enrolled. The rate of bosutinib discontinuation at 12 months was 25.7% vs. 35.9% in a historical control study (Japanese phase 1/2 study) (p = 0.102). The rate of bosutinib discontinuation due to DRTs was significantly lower, at 11.4% vs. 28.2% (p = 0.015). The incidence of grade 3/4 transaminase elevation was 20% vs. 29% (p = 0.427), while the incidence of diarrhea was 3% vs. 25% (p = 0.009). The median dose intensity of bosutinib was higher (391.7 mg/day vs. 353.9 mg/day). Pharmacokinetic analysis of bosutinib showed that patients who achieved a major molecular response tended to have high trough concentrations. Thus, a low initial dose of bosutinib followed by dose escalation reduced discontinuation due to severe DRTs while maintaining high dose intensity and efficacy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

This final analysis from the phase 4 BYOND trial reports outcomes with bosutinib in patients with previously treated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML); 163 patients with CML resistant/intolerant to previous tyrosine kinase inhibitors received bosutinib (starting dose: 500 mg QD). At study completion (median follow-up, 47.8 months), 48.1% (n = 75/156) of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic phase CML were still receiving treatment. Among evaluable patients, 71.8% (95% CI, 63.9-78.9) and 59.7% (95% CI, 51.4-67.7) attained or maintained major molecular response (MMR) and molecular response (MR) 4 , respectively, at any time on treatment. The majority of patients achieved a deeper molecular response relative to baseline while on bosutinib. Kaplan-Meier probabilities (95% CI) of maintaining MMR and MR 4 at 36 months were 87.2% (78.0-92.7) and 80.7% (69.4-88.1), respectively. At 48 months, the Kaplan-Meier overall survival rate was 88.3% (95% CI, 81.8-92.6); there were 17 deaths, including 2 that were considered CML related. Long-term adverse events (AEs) were consistent with the known safety profile of bosutinib, and no new safety issues were identified. The management of AEs through dose reduction maintained efficacy while improving tolerability. These results support the use of bosutinib in patients with previously treated CML.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02228382., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Despite the wide use of a 3-month gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist for ovarian function suppression in premenopausal breast cancer patients, it remains unclear whether it is as effective and safe as a 1-month GnRH agonist regimen when combined with selective estrogen receptor modulators or aromatase inhibitors, especially in younger patients., Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 1109 premenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients treated with GnRH agonist plus selective estrogen receptor modulator or aromatase inhibitor. The estradiol (E2) inhibition rate within 1-24 months after treatment with 1-month or 3-month GnRH agonist in cohorts and different subgroups was analyzed., Results: Following 1:1 propensity score matching, 950 patients with a mean age of 39 years and a median follow-up of 46 months were included. Both the 1-month and 3-month groups achieved more than 90% E2 inhibition within 24 months (94.53% vs 92.84%, with a 95% confidence interval for the difference ranging from -4.78% to 1.41%), confirming the noninferiority of 3-month GnRH agonist. Both 1-month and 3-month GnRH agonist rapidly and consistently reduced E2 levels. Of the patients, 60 (6.3%) experienced incomplete ovarian function suppression, with similar rates in the 1-month and 3-month groups (5.5% vs 7.2%). Incomplete ovarian function suppression mainly occurred within the first 12 months, with age younger than 40 years and no prior chemotherapy being the risk factors. Similar disease-free survival and overall survival were found in the 1-month and 3-month groups and in patients with complete and incomplete ovarian function suppression (P > .05)., Conclusions: The ovarian function suppression with 3-month GnRH agonist was not inferior to that with 1-month GnRH agonist, regardless of age or combination with a selective estrogen receptor modulator or an aromatase inhibitor., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

In the field of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), new strategies are needed to increase the rate of successful treatment discontinuations, a crucial goal in this disease. Anti-PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors are a promising therapeutic approach in CML after the demonstration of an increase of these inhibitory molecules in patients with CML. A phase Ib/II (NCT04793399, registration date March 11, 2021) open-label exploratory trial has been conducted to evaluate the safety of atezolizumab, a humanized anti-PD-L1 antibody, in combination with bosutinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML. A total of 36 patients were planned to be enrolled, but the study had to be prematurely terminated due to safety concerns. Nine patients were included in the study, and only 8 went on to receive the combination with atezolizumab. There were a total of 44 adverse events (AEs) during the study period. The most frequent were gastrointestinal (50%), mostly mild (86% grade 1-2). The most serious AEs were hepatic. There were 17 hepatic AEs in 5 patients. Of the hepatic AEs 5 were during the bosutinib monotherapy phase and 12 during the combination phase (AST increase x4, ALT increase x4, blood bilirubin increase x1, alkaline phosphatase elevation x2, GGT increase x2), most of them grade 3-4. There were 2 patients who presented a dose-limiting toxicity; a grade 3 elevation of transaminases, that led to premature termination of the study. The combination of atezolizumab with bosutinib presents hepatotoxicity as a dose-limiting effect and therefore we do not recommend to explore this combination in future studies., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

HIV prevention with pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) constitutes a major pillar in fighting the ongoing epidemic. While daily oral PrEP adherence may be challenging, long-acting (LA-)PrEP in oral or implant formulations could overcome frequent dosing with convenient administration. The novel drug islatravir (ISL) may be suitable for LA-PrEP, but dose-dependent reductions in CD 4 + T cell and lymphocyte counts were observed at high doses. We developed a mathematical model to predict ISL pro-drug levels in plasma and active intracellular ISL-triphosphate concentrations after oral vs. subcutaneous implant dosing. Using phase II trial data, we simulated antiviral effects and estimated HIV risk reduction for multiple dosages and dosing frequencies. We then established exposure thresholds where no adverse effects on immune cells were observed. Our findings suggest that implants with 56-62 mg ISL offer effective HIV risk reduction without reducing lymphocyte counts. Oral 0.1 mg daily, 3-5 mg weekly, and 10 mg biweekly ISL provide comparable efficacy, but weekly and biweekly doses may affect lymphocyte counts, while daily dosing regimen offered no advantage over existing oral PrEP. Oral 0.5-1 mg on demand provided > 90 % protection, while not being suitable for post-exposure prophylaxis. These findings suggest ISL could be considered for further development as a promising and safe agent for implantable PrEP., (© 2024 The Author(s). CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Objective: Bosutinib (BST) is a Biopharmaceutics Classification System Class II drug having very low solubility and high permeability. Low aqueous solubility and poor dissolution of BST lead to poor bioavailability, Thus, limited aqueous solubility is the bottleneck for the therapeutic outcome of BST. Animal data suggest that the absolute bioavailability of BST is about 14-34% due to an extensive first-pass effect. To overcome hepatic first-pass metabolism and to enhance oral bioavailability, lipid-based drug delivery systems such as solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) can be used., Methods: SLNs are submicron colloidal carriers having a size range of 50-1000 nm. These are prepared with physiological lipid and dispersed in water or aqueous surfactant solution. BST can be conveniently loaded into SLNs to improve the oral bioavailability by exploiting the intestinal lymphatic transport. An optimal system was evaluated for bioavailability study in rats compared with that of BST suspension (SUS)., Results: An in vitro cytotoxicity study was done by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide assay method through ATCC cell lines; the percent inhibition was more in SLN when compared with SUS. The pharmacokinetics of BST-SLNs after oral administration in male Wistar rats was studied. The bioavailability of BST was increased by 2.28 fold when compared with that of a BST SUS., Conclusion: The results are indicative of SLNs as suitable lipid-based carrier system for improving the oral bioavailability of BST.

Background: Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of salivary gland cancer, frequently associated with incurable recurrences and distant metastases (R/M). Proliferation of SDC relies on androgen receptor (AR) signalling, prompting the use of combined androgen blockade (CAB, i.e., luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist and/or AR antagonists) to R/M SDC patients. However, only a subset of patients benefits from such treatments. We have shown that response to CAB is associated with steroid 5α-reductase 1 (SRD5A1) mRNA expression. SRD5A1 catalyses the intracellular conversion of testosterone into the more potent AR-agonist dihydrotestosterone. This conversion can be inhibited by dutasteride, a potent SRD5A1-inhibitor, which is currently prescribed for benign prostatic hyperplasia. We hypothesize that repurposing dutasteride to target AR signalling in SDC could enhance therapeutic response and clinical outcome in SDC patients., Methods: This prospective, open-label, randomized controlled phase II clinical trial, is designed to investigate whether dutasteride as an adjunct drug to CAB improves response rate and clinical outcome in patients with AR-positive R/M SDC. Patients are divided in two cohorts based on their prior systemic treatments. In cohort A, CAB-naïve patients (n = 74) will be randomly assigned to either a control arm (Arm 1) receiving CAB (goserelin 10.8 mg/3m and bicalutamide 50 mg/OD) or an experimental arm (Arm 2) where dutasteride (0.5 mg/OD) is added to the CAB regimen. In cohort B, patients with disease progression after adjuvant or first-line palliative CAB therapy (max. n = 24) will receive goserelin, bicalutamide, and dutasteride to assess whether the addition of dutasteride can overcome therapy resistance. The primary endpoints are the objective response rate and duration of response. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, overall survival, clinical benefit rate, quality of life, and safety. Translational research will be performed to explore molecular target expression differences and their correlation with clinical outcome., Discussion: The DUCT study addresses an unmet medical need by investigating the repurposing of dutasteride to enhance treatment response and improve clinical outcome for patients with R/M SDC, especially those with limited alternative treatment options, such as HER2-negative cases. By repurposing a registered low-cost drug, this trial's findings could be readily applied into clinical practice., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05513365. Date of registration: August 24, 2022., Protocol Version: Current protocol version 4.0, February 21, 2024., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% was first approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2011. Opzelura™ cream was introduced by Incyte Dermatology in 2021 for the short-term and non-continuous chronic treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) in non-immunocompromised patients aged ≥12 years, whose clinical manifestations are not controlled with prescribed topical therapies, such as topical corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, or topical phosphodiesterase-4 ( PDE4) inhibitors, or when such therapies are not advisable. Ruxolitinib is a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor that addresses inflammation in AD. It selectively inhibits JAK1 and JAK2, blocking JAK and activating signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT), thereby interrupting the cytokine pathways responsible for cutaneous inflammation. The targeted downstream cytokines include Interleukin- 4 (IL-4), IL-13, IL-31, and cytokine thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), which play pivotal roles in the itching and inflammation experienced by AD patients. Ruxolitinib cream is directly applied as a thin layer over AD lesions twice daily up to 20% body surface area (BSA) using no more than 60 g per week. It can be used for up to 8 weeks on delicate or thin skin surfaces.

Refractory acute T-lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), which is characterized by a low sensitivity to conventional induction therapy and poor prognosis, poses significant challenges during treatment. This study reported a case of refractory T-ALL patient with mutations in the JAK1, JAK3, and STAT5B genes from Nanjing University's Gulou Hospital. Following an unsuccessful course of standard VDLP regimen chemotherapy, the treatment was modified to include ruxolitinib in combination with venetoclax and azacitidine. Subsequent to this therapy, the patient achieved bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. Notably, pleural effusion and mediastinal mass significantly improved the post-chest cavity infusion of dexamethasone combined with etoposide at the same stage. The patient also underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation upon achieving bone marrow remission and was followed up until January 2024. Ruxolitinib combined with venetoclax and azacytidine has shown promising efficacy and safety in treating refractory T-ALL harboring the JAK1, JAK3, and STAT5B mutations, providing a novel therapeutic approach for such patients.

Objective: To recommend precision dosing and improve therapeutic efficacy against invasive fungal disease, a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model (PBPK) of oral isavuconazole (ISA) was established and used to explore its disposition across populations in different physiological and pathological states., Methods: Twenty-five pharmacokinetic (PK) studies of oral ISA were identified through a systematic search of PubMed. Concentration-time data were extracted using WebPlotDigitizer. Physiochemical parameters were obtained from published literature and DrugBank. Model development and simulation used the Simcyp population-based simulator, and visual predictive check and predictive error were used for the model evaluation. Probability of target attainment and the cumulative fraction of response analyses were performed for dose optimization., Results: The developed PBPK model was successfully validated in different populations. Most predicted concentration-time points aligned with the observed data, with acceptable predictive errors for the critical parameters. We predicted the PK profiles and parameters of ISA in a population with severe hepatic impairment (HI), a population with obesity and paediatric patients aged 1 to less than 6 years old. The probability of target attainment and cumulative fraction of response analyses indicated that the population with severe HI should have half the maintenance dose. The population with obesity and population with severe HI should have a loading dose of 300 mg every 8 h for 2 days. For paediatric patients aged 1 to less than 6 years old, a weight-based dosing regimen (5.38 mg/kg) of ISA was suggested., Conclusion: The predicted value aligns with observations, suggesting ISA's potential predictability in PK profiles for other populations. The recommended dosing regimens increase our understanding of the use of ISA in special populations., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Aims: Androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs) have become an effective treatment for advanced prostate cancer (PC). However, it is unknown which ARI is the most helpful and safe for men with advanced PC. Our aim is to help physicians make clinical decisions and provide medication guidelines for patients with advanced PC to avoid potential risks when using ARIs for treatment., Methods: We systematically searched the following databases: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, with a literature publication deadline of February 2023. The primary efficacy outcomes were 18-month overall survival (OS), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), hypertension and fatigue. The network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed by Stata 15.1, and Revman 5.3 was used to assess the included studies' risk of bias., Results: The analysis included 26 trials with 26 263 people. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) concluded that enzalutamide (86.8%) showed the best effect in prolonging the OS of patients. Flutamide led to the highest risk of TEAEs (29.9%) and AEs leading to discontinuation (12.8%). Apalutamide (13.4%) led to the highest risk of grade ≥3 TEAEs. Enzalutamide had the highest risk of hypertension (0.2%), grade ≥3 hypertension (4.5%) and fatigue (5.2%)., Conclusions: This NMA indicates there is no one ARI to reach both the most effective and safe therapy aims for treating advanced PC and that there is a compromise between the efficacy and safety of ARIs in the treatment of advanced PC. Physicians should weigh the risks to safety against the anticipated benefits when prescribing these drugs to patients with PC., (© 2024 British Pharmacological Society.)

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) - performing dose adjustments based on measured drug levels and established pharmacokinetic (PK) targets - could optimise treatment with drugs that show large interpatient variability in exposure. We evaluated the feasibility of TDM for multiple oral targeted therapies. Here we report on drugs for which routine TDM is not feasible., Methods: We evaluated drug cohorts from the Dutch Pharmacology Oncology Group - TDM study. Based on PK levels taken at pre-specified time points, PK-guided interventions were performed. Feasibility of TDM was evaluated, and based on the success and practicability of TDM, cohorts could be closed., Results: For 10 out of 24 cohorts TDM was not feasible and inclusion was closed. A high incidence of adverse events resulted in closing the cabozantinib, dabrafenib/trametinib, everolimus, regorafenib and vismodegib cohort. The enzalutamide and erlotinib cohorts were closed because almost all PK levels were above target. Other, non-pharmacological reasons led to closing the palbociclib, olaparib and tamoxifen cohort., Conclusions: Although TDM could help personalising treatment for many drugs, the above-mentioned reasons can influence its feasibility, usefulness and clinical applicability. Therefore, routine TDM is not advised for cabozantinib, dabrafenib/trametinib, enzalutamide, erlotinib, everolimus, regorafenib and vismodegib. Nonetheless, TDM remains valuable for individual clinical decisions., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the prognostic outcomes between metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) patients receiving conventional androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and those receiving ADT plus a novel androgen-receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) in routine clinical practice in Japan., Methods: This was conducted as a retrospective multicenter study including 581 mCSPC patients, consisting of 305 receiving ADT alone or in combination with bicalutamide (group 1) and 276 receiving ADT plus one of the following ARSIs: abiraterone acetate, apalutamide, or enzalutamide (group 2). Prognostic outcomes between these 2 groups were comprehensively compared., Results: In the entire cohort, prostate-specific antigen-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) in group 2 was significantly longer than that in group 1, while no significant difference was noted in overall survival (OS) between the two groups. In patients corresponding to the LATITUDE high-risk group, however, both PSA-PFS and OS in group 2 were significantly longer than those in group 1. Of several factors examined, the following were identified as independent predictors of poor PSA-PFS in the entire cohort as well as the LATITUDE high-risk group: high C-reactive protein, high lactate dehydrogenase, high alkaline phosphatase, high Gleason score, and group 1. Furthermore, it was possible to precisely classify both the entire cohort and LATITUDE high-risk group into 3 risk groups regarding PSA-PFS according to the positive numbers of independent factors: positive for ≤1 factor, favorable; 2 factors, intermediate; and ≥3 factors, poor., Conclusion: Combined use of ARSIs with ADT could improve the prognostic outcomes of mCSPC patients, particularly those in the LATITUDE high-risk group, in real-world clinical practice in Japan., (© 2024 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Lipid-based formulations (LbFs) have demonstrated success in pharmaceutical applications; however, challenges persist in dissolving entire doses of the drug into defined liquid volumes. In this study, the temperature-induced supersaturation method was employed in LbF to address drug loading and pill burden issues. Supersaturated LbFs (super-LbF) were prepared using the temperature-induced supersaturation method, where the drug load is above its equilibrium solubility. Further, the influence of the drug's physicochemical and thermal characteristics on drug loading and their relevance with an apparent degree of supersaturation (aDS) was studied using two model drugs, ibrutinib and enzalutamide. All the prepared LbFs were evaluated in terms of physical stability, dispersion, and solubilization capacity, as well as pharmacokinetic assessments. Drug re-crystallization was observed in the lipid solution on long-term storage at higher aDS values of 2-2.5. Furthermore, high-throughput lipolysis studies demonstrated a significant decrease in drug concentration across all LbFs (regardless of drug loading) due to a decline in the formulation solvation capacity and subsequent generation of in-situ supersaturation. Further, the in vivo results demonstrated comparable pharmacokinetic parameters between conventional LbF and super-LbF. The short duration of the thermodynamic metastable state limits the potential absorption benefits. However, super-LbFs of Ibr and Enz showed superior profiles, with 1.7-fold and 5.2-fold increased drug exposure compared to their respective crystalline suspensions. In summary, this study emphasizes the potential of temperature-induced supersaturation in LbF for enhancing drug loading and highlights the intricate interplay between drug properties, formulation characteristics, and in vivo performance., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists.)

Deltamethrin (DLM) is a newer kind of insecticide that is used on pets, livestock, and crops, as well as to combat malaria vectors and household pests. It belongs to the synthetic pyrethroid group and is being promoted as an alternative to organophosphate chemicals due to its persistent and destructive effects. The current study aimed to evaluate the impact of sub-chronic oral exposure to DLM on autoimmune activity in rats. Three groups of male albino rats (15 rats/group) including the control group, the ethanol-treated group (1 ml/rat), and the DLM-treated group (5 mg/kg b.w). Samples of blood were taken from all groups at 4-, 8- and 12-week intervals for the determination of hematological, cytokines, and immunological parameters. T lymphocyte subsets and Treg lymphocytes were determined in serum using flow cytometric acquisition. The results revealed that DLM significantly increased TNF-α, IL-33, IL-6, IL-17, IgG, IgM, WBCs, differential count, and platelets while decreasing Hb concentration and RBCs. Additionally, DLM decreased the number of T-cell subsets (CD3, CD4, CD5, and CD8) and Treg lymphocytes. All of these impacts became more severe over time. It is possible to conclude that the sub-chronic oral exposure to DLM disturbed autoimmune activity through the disturbances in immunological indices, CDs subset Treg lymphocytes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study was the first to evaluate the effect of CYP3A5*3 gene polymorphisms on plasma concentration of perampanel (PER) in Chinese pediatric patients with epilepsy., Methods: We enrolled 98 patients for this investigation. Plasma PER concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Leftover samples from standard therapeutic drug monitoring were allocated for genotyping analysis. The primary measure of efficacy was the rate of seizure reduction with PER treatment at the final checkup., Results: The plasma concentration showed a linear correlation with the daily dose taken ( r  = 0.17; P  < 0.05). The ineffective group showed a significantly lower plasma concentration of PER (490.5 ± 297.1 vs. 633.8 ± 305.5 μg/ml; P  = 0.019). For the mean concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratio, the ineffective group showed a significantly lower C/D ratio of PER (3.2 ± 1.7 vs. 3.8 ± 2.0; P  = 0.040). The CYP3A5*3 CC genotype exhibited the highest average plasma concentration of PER at 562.8 ± 293.9 ng/ml, in contrast to the CT and TT genotypes at 421.1 ± 165.6 ng/ml and 260.0 ± 36.1 ng/ml. The mean plasma PER concentration was significantly higher in the adverse events group (540.8 ± 285.6 vs. 433.0 ± 227.2 ng/ml; P  = 0.042)., Conclusion: The CYP3A5*3 gene's genetic polymorphisms influence plasma concentrations of PER in Chinese pediatric patients with epilepsy. Given that both efficacy and potential toxicity are closely tied to plasma PER levels, the CYP3A5*3 genetic genotype should be factored in when prescribing PER to patients with epilepsy., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Female-pattern hair loss (FPHL) is characterized by decreased scalp hair density, thinning of hair shafts, and progressive miniaturization of hair follicles., Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of spironolactone versus bicalutamide in female pattern hair loss [FPHL]., Methods: The study design was retrospective, and all eligible females aged between 18 years and 50 years with FPHL were included. We identified 120 patients from our database who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and patients were then categorized into two groups, Group A comprising patients who were taking 100 mg of spironolactone once daily and Group B comprising patients who were taking 50 mg of bicalutamide once daily along with topical minoxidil 2% in both groups. Patient were analysed at approximately at 24 weeks from the commencement of the treatment., Results: Mean reduction in hair loss severity score on Sinclair scale was 19.51% in spironolactone group compared to 28.20% in bicalutamide group at 24 weeks, which was statistically significant. On global photographic assessment, marked improvement was seen in bicalutamide group compared to spironolactone group (p = 0.139)., Conclusions: Our study, though limited by its retrospective design and small sample size, showed that bicalutamide has greater efficacy and better safety profile in comparison to spironolactone in the treatment of FPHL., (© 2024 Australasian College of Dermatologists.)

Background: Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The objective of this work was to compare the costs per adult patient, associated with intravenous isavuconazole (ISAV) followed by oral ISAV versus the regimen of liposomal amphotericin B followed by posaconazole (L-AMB→POSA) in the treatment of IFI. The comparison was conducted from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System (SNS)., Methods: As indirect comparisons have demonstrated similar efficacy between the comparators, a cost-minimization approach was taken. Drug acquisition, administration, hospitalization, laboratory tests and adverse events costs were evaluated from SNS perspective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyzes were performed., Results: Total costs per-patient were €24,715.54 with ISAV versus €29,753.53 with L-AMB→POSA, resulting in cost-savings per patient treated with ISAV of €5,037.99 (-16.9%). Treatment costs of IFI remained lower for ISAV than for L-AMB→POSA across all sensitivity analyses (-7,968.89€ to -326.59€), being treatment duration the most influential parameter., Conclusion: According to the present model, the treatment of IFIs with ISAV would generate savings for the SNS compared to L-AMB→POSA. These savings are attributed to the shorter duration of IV treatment, reduced use of healthcare resources and lower costs associated with managing adverse effects when ISAV was employed.

Purpose: We previously reported that postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-α-positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant anastrozole 1 mg/day (ANA1) with estrone (E1) ≥1.3 pg/mL and estradiol (E2) ≥0.5 pg/mL [inadequate estrogen suppression (IES)] had a threefold increased risk of a breast cancer event. The objective of this study was to determine if increasing anastrozole to 10 mg/day (ANA10) could result in adequate estrogen suppression (AES: E1 <1.3 pg/mL and/or E2 <0.5 pg/mL) among those with IES on ANA1., Patients and Methods: Postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-α-positive breast cancer planning to receive adjuvant ANA1 were eligible. E1 and E2 were assessed pre- and post-8 to 10 weeks of ANA1. Those with IES were switched to 8- to 10-week cycles of ANA10 followed by letrozole 2.5 mg/day. E1 and E2 were assessed after each cycle. Anastrozole concentrations were measured post-ANA1 and post-ANA10. Primary analyses included patients who documented taking at least 80% of the planned treatment (adherent cohort)., Results: In total, 132 (84.6%) of 156 eligible patients were ANA1 adherent. IES occurred in 40 (30.3%) adherent patients. Twenty-five (78.1%) of 32 patients who began ANA10 were adherent, and AES was achieved in 19 (76.0%; 90% confidence interval, 58.1%-89.0%) patients. Anastrozole concentrations post-ANA1 and post-ANA10 did not differ by estrogen suppression status among adherent patients. AES was maintained/attained in 21 (91.3%) of 23 letrozole-adherent patients., Conclusions: Approximately 30% of ANA1-adherent patients had IES. Among those who switched to ANA10 and were adherent, 76% had AES. Further studies are required to validate emerging data that ANA1 results in IES for some patients and to determine the clinical benefit of switching to ANA10 or an alternative aromatase inhibitor., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Vitiligo is a chronic skin condition caused by an autoimmune response that results in the progressive loss of melanocytes and recent studies have suggested that Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are emerging as a promising new treatment modality. Therefore, to assess and understand the extent of knowledge in the emerging field of JAKi use in vitiligo, a scoping review of the literature was undertaken. The reviewed articles explored a wide variety of JAKi administered either orally or topically for vitiligo. There were no injectable JAKi studied. Tofacitinib was the most commonly studied oral JAKi in 16 of the 35 studies selected for review, followed by baricitinib (n = 3), and one study each with ritlecitinib, ruxolitinib, and upadacitinib. Ruxolitinib (n = 6) and tofacitinib (n = 6) were the most often studied topical JAKi, followed by delgocitinib (n = 1). Potential benefits may vary between JAKi based on their receptor selectivity profile and coexistent autoimmune diseases. A topical JAKi would be advantageous in limited body area involvement and in adolescents. Concurrent use of JAKi with phototherapy or sun exposure appears beneficial. Most studies permitted the use of other topical agents. Acne-related events, though frequent yet mild, were reported with both oral and topical JAKi. Nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infections, and headaches were the most common adverse effects seen in the larger trials with JAKi. No serious or clinically meaningful hematology or thromboembolic events were detected. Treatment of vitiligo with oral or topical JAKi seems to be promising and the growing evidence shows a favorable risk-benefit profile., (© 2024 The Authors. International Journal of Dermatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the International Society of Dermatology.)

Background: Isavuconazole is a relatively new antifungal agent indicated for the management of various invasive fungal diseases (IFDs), including invasive aspergillosis. Information on real-world experience with isavuconazole is scarce. This retrospective observational study aimed to describe the usage of isavuconazole in clinical practice with an in-depth evaluation of individual isavuconazole exposure., Methods: Patients treated with isavuconazole were evaluated based on retrospective data, including therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data and efficacy and safety data. Additionally, we calculated the individual isavuconazole exposure described by the average AUC24 over the first 7 days of treatment by means of non-linear mixed-effects modelling and compared this with the currently desired lower target AUC of 60 mg·h/L., Results: Ninety-nine patients treated with isavuconazole were evaluated. In our real-life cohort, isavuconazole was often deployed off-label in patients with non-classical host factors and infections with non-Aspergillus and non-Mucorales species. Isavuconazole was most often chosen for its safety profile, even after prior triazole treatment with manifestations of toxicity. TDM and subsequent dosage adjustments were frequently performed. The individual average AUC24 over 7 days was above 60 mg·h/L in 29 out of 77 (37.7%) patients., Conclusions: This overview provides practical insights that can aid clinicians in the management of their patients with IFD. Our study shows that isavuconazole was used in a diverse patient population and was well tolerated overall. Individual isavuconazole exposure reflected by the average AUC24 over the first 7 days of treatment was generally low and variable. Dosage adjustments following TDM were frequently performed. Our experience shows that isavuconazole is a feasible alternative after prior azole treatment., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Background/aim: Vildagliptin is one of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors that have been shown to improve hyperglycemia in clinical trials among patients with type 2 diabetes. However, few studies have examined the efficacy of vildagliptin in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD)., Patients and Methods: Eight patients with DKD received oral vildagliptin 50-100 mg/day. The duration of diabetes was 6.7±5.9 years and observation period was 23.6±9.8 months. Changes in fasting blood glucose, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) were studied before and after the administration of vildagliptin., Results: Vildagliptin treatment significantly decreased fasting blood glucose and HbA1c, compared to baseline (132±56 mg/dl, p=0.036, 6.0±0.3, p=0.041, respectively). UPCR tended to be decreased, albeit without statistical significance. However, eGFR was decreased after the administration of vildagliptin. No significant adverse effects were observed in all patients during the study., Conclusion: Although the sample size was limited and the observation period was brief, vildagliptin was found to be an effective and reasonably well-tolerated treatment for patients with DKD., (Copyright © 2024, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The majority of patients with metastatic prostate cancer who receive androgen-deprivation therapy and androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitors (ARSI) progress. Activation of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is associated with ARSI resistance. This single-arm phase I trial assessed safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) feasibility of a combined AR antagonist (enzalutamide) and selective GR modulator (relacorilant) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)., Patients and Methods: This was a phase I trial (NCT03674814) of relacorilant and enzalutamide in patients with refractory mCRPC enrolled using a 6+3 design. The enzalutamide dose was kept constant at 120 mg/d with escalating doses of relacorilant based on safety and PK measures in cohorts of ≥6 patients. The primary objective was safety and establishment of pharmacologically active doses. Secondary objectives were related to antitumor activity., Results: Thirty-five patients with mCRPC were enrolled. Twenty-three were accrued across three dose cohorts in the dose-escalation phase, and 12 enrolled at the recommended phase II dose. The combination was generally well tolerated, safe, and achieved desirable enzalutamide PK. RP2D of 120 + 150 mg/d, respectively, was established. Median time on study was 2.2 months with four patients remaining on study for longer than 11 months. Four of 12 evaluable patients had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) partial response., Conclusions: This is the first prospective trial combining an AR antagonist and a nonsteroidal selective GR modulator. The combination was safe and well tolerated with PSA response and prolonged disease control observed in a limited subset of patients. Further prospective trials are justified to evaluate efficacy and identify predictive biomarkers of response., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Limited data exist regarding treatment response prediction to oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS)., Objectives: We assessed the capacity of available scoring systems to anticipate disease activity parameters in naïve relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients initiating daily oral DMTs, hypothesizing that they exhibit different predictive potentials., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study and applied the Rio Score (RS), modified Rio Score (mRS), and MAGNIMS Score 12 months after DMT initiation. At 36 months, we examined their ability to predict evidence of disease activity (EDA) components and treatment failure by logistic regression analysis., Results: Notably, 218 patients (62.4% females) initiating dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, and fingolimod were included. At 36 months, the RS high-risk group predicted evidence of clinical activity (odds ratio (OR) 10 [2.7-36.9]) and treatment failure (OR 10.6 [3.4-32.5]) but did not predict radiological activity (OR 1.9 [0.7-5]). The mRS non-responders group did not predict EDA and treatment failure. RS, mRS, and MAGNIMS 0 categories showed significantly lower EDA and treatment failure than the remainder., Conclusion: Scoring systems present different predictive abilities for disease activity parameters at 36 months in MS patients initiating daily oral therapies, warranting further adjustments (i.e. introduction of fluid biomarkers) to depict disease activity status fully., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: A.P. has received funding travel from Roche and speaking honoraria from Novartis; he developed this project during a 2021 ECTRIMS Clinical Training Fellowship program and is currently performing an MSIF-ARSEP Fellowship program. R.C. has received consulting services and speaking honoraria from Roche, Novartis, BIIB-Colombia, Merck, Sanofi, and was funded by an ECTRIMS Clinical Training Fellowship program. C.T. is currently being funded by a Junior Leader La Caixa Fellowship; she has also received the 2021 Merck’s Award for the Investigation in Multiple Sclerosis (Spain) and a grant (PI/01860) from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain; and she has also received speaker honoraria from Roche and Novartis. A.C.C. has received a grant from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain; JR19/00007. P.C.M.’s yearly salary is supported by a grant from Biogen to Fundació Privada Cemcat for statistical analysis. N.B. has received travel expenses for scientific meetings and speaking honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Biogen, and Merck, and is currently being funded by ECTRIMS Fellowship. A.V.J. receives support for contracts Juan Rodes (JR16/00024) from Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain; and has received speaking honoraria and travel expenses from Novartis, Roche, Teva, Biogen, and Sanofi-Genzyme. G.A. has received speaking honoraria, compensation for consulting services or participation in advisory boards from Sanofi, Merck, Roche, and Horizon Therapeutics; travel support for scientific meetings from Novartis, Roche, and ECTRIMS; is editor for Europe of the Multiple Sclerosis Journal—Experimental, Translational and Clinical; is a member of the International Women in Multiple Sclerosis (iWiMS) network executive committee; and is a member of the European Biomarkers in MS (BioMS-eu) consortium steering committee. N.M.O. has a predoctoral grant Rio Hortega, from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Spain). C.N. has received funding for travel from Biogen Idec and F. Hoffmann-La Roche, and speaker honoraria from Novartis. B.R.A. has received honoraria for consulting services from Wellspect. A.Z. has received travel expenses for scientific meetings from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, and Novartis; speaking honoraria from Eisai; and a study grant from Novartis. M.C. has received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Bayer Schering Pharma, Merck Serono, Biogen Idec, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, and Novartis. J.S.G. has received compensation for participating on Advisory Boards, speaking honoraria, and travel expenses for scientific meetings, consulting services, or research support from Celgene, Novartis, Biogen, Teva, Merck, Almirall, and Genzyme. M.T. has received compensation for consulting services, speaking honoraria from Almirall, Bayer Schering Pharma, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, and is co-editor of Multiple Sclerosis Journal—ETC. A.R. serves on scientific advisory boards for Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Icometrix, SyntheticMR, Bayer, Biogen, and OLEA Medical, and has received speaker honoraria from Bayer, Sanofi Genzyme, Bracco, Merck Serono, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Novartis, Roche, and Biogen. X.M. has received speaking honoraria and travel expenses for participation in scientific meetings, has been a steering committee member of clinical trials or participated in advisory boards of clinical trials in the past years with Abbvie, Actelion, Alexion, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, EMD Serono, Genzyme, Hoffmann-La Roche, Immunic, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, MedDay, Merck, Mylan, NervGen, Novartis, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceutical, TG Therapeutics, Excemed, MSIF, and NMSS. J.R. has received speaking honoraria and personal compensation for participating on Advisory Boards from Almirall, Bayer Schering Healthcare, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Teva, and Sanofi Aventis. C.A., A.S.A., J.C.J., L.B., L.M., A.S., I.G., and M.R.B. report no disclosures.

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of early PSA decline following initiation of second-generation hormone therapy (2nd HT), namely abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide, in patients with taxane-refractory metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and evaluate utility of this metric in informing intensified surveillance/imaging protocols., Methods: We retrospectively identified 75 mCRPC patients treated with 2nd HT following docetaxel failure (defined as PSA rise and radiographic progression). Patients were categorized patients into two cohorts based on the first PSA within 3 months after initiation of therapy: PSA reduction ≥50% (Group A) and PSA reduction <50% (Group B). The primary endpoint was cancer-specific mortality (CSM). The secondary endpoint was radiographic disease progression (rDP) on 2nd HT. In univariate and multivariate analyses, we investigated factors associated with rPD and CSM., Results: We included 75 patients (52 in Group A, 23 in Group B) in the analytic cohort. Baseline clinico-demographic characteristics, including median age, primary Gleason score risk group, median pre-treatment PSA, disease burden, site of metastases, and pre-treatment ECOG score were not statistically different between the two groups. Median follow up time was 30 months and the median time to radiographic disease progression was 28.1 and 12.5 months (p = 0.002) in cohorts A and B, respectively. On univariate and multivariate analyses, both PSA reduction ≥50% and volume of metastatic disease were significantly associated with a decreased risk of radiographic disease progression (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.80, p = 0.0113) as well as a decreased risk of cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09-0.87, p = 0.0325)., Conclusion: PSA reduction ≥50% within 3 months of starting 2nd HT was associated with significantly improved radiographic disease progression-free survival and 3-year cancer-specific mortality. This suggests using PSA 50%-decline metric in surveillance patients with on 2nd HT and identifies patients who require further evaluation with imaging., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: Previous evidence indicates that adjuvant, short-course androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improves metastasis-free survival when given with primary radiotherapy for intermediate-risk and high-risk localised prostate cancer. However, the value of ADT with postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy is unclear., Methods: RADICALS-HD was an international randomised controlled trial to test the efficacy of ADT used in combination with postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Key eligibility criteria were indication for radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, prostate-specific antigen less than 5 ng/mL, absence of metastatic disease, and written consent. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to radiotherapy alone (no ADT) or radiotherapy with 6 months of ADT (short-course ADT), using monthly subcutaneous gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue injections, daily oral bicalutamide monotherapy 150 mg, or monthly subcutaneous degarelix. Randomisation was done centrally through minimisation with a random element, stratified by Gleason score, positive margins, radiotherapy timing, planned radiotherapy schedule, and planned type of ADT, in a computerised system. The allocated treatment was not masked. The primary outcome measure was metastasis-free survival, defined as distant metastasis arising from prostate cancer or death from any cause. Standard survival analysis methods were used, accounting for randomisation stratification factors. The trial had 80% power with two-sided α of 5% to detect an absolute increase in 10-year metastasis-free survival from 80% to 86% (hazard ratio [HR] 0·67). Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN40814031, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00541047., Findings: Between Nov 22, 2007, and June 29, 2015, 1480 patients (median age 66 years [IQR 61-69]) were randomly assigned to receive no ADT (n=737) or short-course ADT (n=743) in addition to postoperative radiotherapy at 121 centres in Canada, Denmark, Ireland, and the UK. With a median follow-up of 9·0 years (IQR 7·1-10·1), metastasis-free survival events were reported for 268 participants (142 in the no ADT group and 126 in the short-course ADT group; HR 0·886 [95% CI 0·688-1·140], p=0·35). 10-year metastasis-free survival was 79·2% (95% CI 75·4-82·5) in the no ADT group and 80·4% (76·6-83·6) in the short-course ADT group. Toxicity of grade 3 or higher was reported for 121 (17%) of 737 participants in the no ADT group and 100 (14%) of 743 in the short-course ADT group (p=0·15), with no treatment-related deaths., Interpretation: Metastatic disease is uncommon following postoperative bed radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. Adding 6 months of ADT to this radiotherapy did not improve metastasis-free survival compared with no ADT. These findings do not support the use of short-course ADT with postoperative radiotherapy in this patient population., Funding: Cancer Research UK, UK Research and Innovation (formerly Medical Research Council), and Canadian Cancer Society., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AN reports honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Merck. ADC reports research grants for the STAMPEDE trial from Janssen, Astellas, Novartis, Sanofi, and Clovis. ACT reports research grants to their institution from Elekta, Varian, and Accuracy; honoraria for talks from Elekta, Accuracy, and Janssen; travel assistance for radiotherapy conferences from Elekta; serving on the data safety board for two academic trials; and roles as the Chair of the MR-Linac Consortium and the genitourinary lead editor for the International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. AC reports receiving grants or contracts from the National Institute for Health and Care Research, Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Cancer Research UK, Medical Research Council (MRC) UK, Prostate Cancer UK, Bayer UK, and Elekta; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from the American Society for Radiation Oncology, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Cancer Research UK, Roche, AstraZeneca, and Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS). CNC reports support for the present manuscript from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Bayer Corp, Knight Therapeutics, and AbbVie. CLG reports participating in the independent data monitoring and steering committee for the BARCODE study at the Institute of Cancer Research in London (principal investigator Prof Ros Eeles). CCP reports consulting fees from AAA, ITM Radiopharma, Myovant, and Clarity Pharmaceuticals to his institution; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Janssen and Bayer to his institution. CM reports that they are employed by University College London (UCL) as Trial Manager for RADICALS. FS reports grants or contracts from Janssen, Bayer, Merck, Pfizer, Astellas, BMS, Novartis, Sanofi, and AstraZeneca to his institution; consulting fees from Janssen, Bayer, Astellas, BMS, Novartis, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Merck, and Pfizer to him; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Janssen, Bayer, Myovant, Astellas, BMS, Novartis, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Merck, and Pfizer to him. LCB reports their previous Institute of Cancer role was funded in part by a Biomedical Research Centre grant which was paid to the institution; the role was not connected to the RADICALS trial. MRS reports research grants and biomarker testing costs, all to their institution and all active in the past 36 months but on research outside of this research, from Astellas, Clovis Oncology, Janssen, Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis; consulting fees from Eli Lilly; speaker fees at a clinical trial statistics training meeting for clinicians (no discussion of particular drugs) from Lilly Oncology, Janssen, and Eisai; and is an independent member of many independent data monitoring committees but all for academic sponsors and unpaid. NWC reports honoraria for lectures, advisory boards, and symposia from AstraZeneca, Janssen, Bayer, and Pfizer; support for travel to and attendance at a European meeting from Bayer; participation on the independent data monitoring committee for the Probio trial (Karolinska), and the trial steering committee for the Capi 28 trial (AstraZeneca) and the STAMPEDE trial (MRC); and is the Joint National Clinical Lead for the National Prostate Cancer Audit. PWMC reports grants or contracts from the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology ACURA program and the Canadian Institute of Health Research; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Pfizer and EMD Serono; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from TerSera, AbbVie, Tolmar, and Knight Therapeutics. PMP reports participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AAA Nordic, MSD, and Pfizer Denmark. SCM reports honoraria from Janssen, Astellas, Knight Therapeutics, AMGEN Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, and Bayer; and support for attending meetings or travel from TerSera and Sanofi. VK reports a Cancer Research UK grant for the CORE trial to his institution; honoraria from Accuracy, Astellas, Bayer, and Boston Scientific; meeting attendance support from Accuray, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boston Scientific, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Norvatis; is an unpaid member of the independent data monitoring committee for the EPIC trial and the advisory board for Bayer and Janssen; and is the unpaid Chair of National Cancer Research Institute Penile subgroup of the Bladder and Renal Clinical Studies Group. WRC reports consulting fees from Bayer and Janssen; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Astellas, Bayer, Janssen, AAA Novartis, and Myriad Genetics; and support for attending meetings or travel from Janssen, AAA Novartis, and Bayer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Previous evidence supports androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with primary radiotherapy as initial treatment for intermediate-risk and high-risk localised prostate cancer. However, the use and optimal duration of ADT with postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy remains uncertain., Methods: RADICALS-HD was a randomised controlled trial of ADT duration within the RADICALS protocol. Here, we report on the comparison of short-course versus long-course ADT. Key eligibility criteria were indication for radiotherapy after previous radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, prostate-specific antigen less than 5 ng/mL, absence of metastatic disease, and written consent. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to add 6 months of ADT (short-course ADT) or 24 months of ADT (long-course ADT) to radiotherapy, using subcutaneous gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (monthly in the short-course ADT group and 3-monthly in the long-course ADT group), daily oral bicalutamide monotherapy 150 mg, or monthly subcutaneous degarelix. Randomisation was done centrally through minimisation with a random element, stratified by Gleason score, positive margins, radiotherapy timing, planned radiotherapy schedule, and planned type of ADT, in a computerised system. The allocated treatment was not masked. The primary outcome measure was metastasis-free survival, defined as metastasis arising from prostate cancer or death from any cause. The comparison had more than 80% power with two-sided α of 5% to detect an absolute increase in 10-year metastasis-free survival from 75% to 81% (hazard ratio [HR] 0·72). Standard time-to-event analyses were used. Analyses followed intention-to-treat principle. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN40814031, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00541047., Findings: Between Jan 30, 2008, and July 7, 2015, 1523 patients (median age 65 years, IQR 60-69) were randomly assigned to receive short-course ADT (n=761) or long-course ADT (n=762) in addition to postoperative radiotherapy at 138 centres in Canada, Denmark, Ireland, and the UK. With a median follow-up of 8·9 years (7·0-10·0), 313 metastasis-free survival events were reported overall (174 in the short-course ADT group and 139 in the long-course ADT group; HR 0·773 [95% CI 0·612-0·975]; p=0·029). 10-year metastasis-free survival was 71·9% (95% CI 67·6-75·7) in the short-course ADT group and 78·1% (74·2-81·5) in the long-course ADT group. Toxicity of grade 3 or higher was reported for 105 (14%) of 753 participants in the short-course ADT group and 142 (19%) of 757 participants in the long-course ADT group (p=0·025), with no treatment-related deaths., Interpretation: Compared with adding 6 months of ADT, adding 24 months of ADT improved metastasis-free survival in people receiving postoperative radiotherapy. For individuals who can accept the additional duration of adverse effects, long-course ADT should be offered with postoperative radiotherapy., Funding: Cancer Research UK, UK Research and Innovation (formerly Medical Research Council), and Canadian Cancer Society., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AN reports honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Merck. ADC reports research grants for the STAMPEDE trial from Janssen, Astellas, Novartis, Sanofi, and Clovis. CMH is an executive committee member for the British Uro-Oncology Group. CNC reports support for the present manuscript from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Bayer Corp, Knight Therapeutics, and AbbVie. CLG reports that they participate in the independent data monitoring and steering committee for the BARCODE study at the Institute of Cancer Research in London (principal investigator Ros Eeles). CB reports stock or stock options from GSK; and has been an employee at GSK since August, 2023. CCP reports consulting fees from AAA, ITM Radiopharma, Myovant, and Clarity Pharmaceuticals to his institution; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Janssen and Bayer to his institution. FS reports grants or contracts from Janssen, Bayer, Merck, Pfizer, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Novartis, Sanofi, and AstraZeneca to his institution; consulting fees from Janssen, Bayer, Astellas, BMS, Novartis, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Merck, and Pfizer to him; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Janssen, Bayer, Myovant, Astellas, BMS, Novartis, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Merck, and Pfizer to him. LCB reports that their previous Institute of Cancer role was funded in part by a Biomedical Research Centre grant which was paid to the institution; the role was not connected to the RADICALS trial. MRS reports research grants and biomarker testing costs, all to institution and all active in past 36 months but on research outside of this research, from Astellas, Clovis Oncology, Janssen, Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis; consulting fees from Eli Lilly; speaker fees at a clinical trial statistics training meeting for clinicians (no discussion of particular drugs) from Lilly Oncology, Janssen, and Eisai; and is an independent member of many independent data monitoring committees but all for academic sponsors and unpaid. NDJ is a Senior Investigator for the National Institute for Health and Care Research. NWC reports honoraria for lectures, advisory boards, and symposia from AstraZeneca, Janssen, Bayer, and Pfizer; support for travel to and attendance at a European meeting from Bayer; participation on an independent data monitoring committee for the Probio trial (Karolinska), and the trial steering committee for the Capi 28 Trial (AstraZeneca) and the STAMPEDE Trial (Medical Research Council [MRC]); and is the Joint National Clinical Lead for National Prostate Cancer Audit. PW reports an educational event payment from Astellas; conference and travel cost support from AstraZeneca and Aventis; and participation on the advisory board for Ferring and Roche. PWMC reports grants or contracts from CARO-ACURA and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Pfizer and EMD Serono; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for TerSera, AbbVie, Tolmar, and Knight Therapeutics. PMP reports participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AAA Nordic, MSD, and Pfizer Denmark. SCM reports honoraria from Janssen, Astellas, Knight Therapeutics, Amgen Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, and Bayer; and support for attending meetings or travel from TerSera and Sanofi. WRC reports consulting fees from Bayer and Janssen; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Astellas, Bayer, Janssen, AAA Novartis, and Myriad Genetics; and support for attending meetings or travel from Janssen, AAA Novartis, and Bayer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Alternative anti-androgen therapy has been widely used as a first-line treatment for castration-resistant prostate cancer, and it may affect treatment outcome of subsequent agents targeting the androgen receptor axis. We conducted the prospective observational DELC (Determination of Enzalutamide Long-term safety and efficacy for Castration-resistant prostate cancer patients after combined anti-androgen blockade followed by alternative anti-androgen therapy) study to evaluate the efficacy of enzalutamide in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who underwent prior combined androgen blockade with bicalutamide and then alternative anti-androgen therapy with flutamide., Methods: The DELC study enrolled 163 Japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who underwent alternative anti-androgen therapy with flutamide following failure of initial combined androgen blockade with bicalutamide in multiple institutions between January 2016 and March 2019. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Administration of enzalutamide was started at 160 mg orally once daily in all patients., Results: The rate of decline of prostate-specific antigen by 50% or more was 72.2%, and median overall survival was 42.05 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that higher pretreatment serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (≥11.3 ng/mL; P = 0.004), neuron-specific enolase (P = 0.014) and interleukin-6 (≥2.15 pg/mL; P = 0.004) were independent risk factors for overall survival. Fatigue (30.0%), constipation (19.6%) and appetite loss (17.8%) were the most common clinically relevant adverse events. The enzalutamide dose was not reduced in any patient under the age of 70, but adherence was decreased in those over 70., Conclusions: In the DELC study, the safety of enzalutamide was comparable to that in previous reports. Serum levels of neuron-specific enolase and interleukin-6 were suggested as prognostic factors for castration-resistant prostate cancer with potential clinical utility., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Invasive aspergillosis is a severe fungal infection that affects multiple organ systems including the CNS and the lungs. Isavuconazole, a novel triazole antifungal agent, has demonstrated promising activity against Aspergillus spp. However, data on the penetration of isavuconazole into the CNS and ELF and intracellular accumulation remain limited., Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective single-centre pharmacokinetic (PK) study in 12 healthy volunteers. Subjects received seven doses of 200 mg isavuconazole to achieve an assumed steady-state. After the first and final infusion, plasma sampling was conducted over 8 and 12 h, respectively. All subjects underwent one lumbar puncture and bronchoalveolar lavage, at either 2, 6 or 12 h post-infusion of the final dose. PBMCs were collected in six subjects from blood to determine intracellular isavuconazole concentrations at 6, 8 or 12 h. The AUC/MIC was calculated for an MIC value of 1 mg/L, which marks the EUCAST susceptibility breakpoint for Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus flavus., Results: C max and AUC0-24h of isavuconazole in plasma under assumed steady-state conditions were 6.57 ± 1.68 mg/L (mean ± SD) and 106 ± 32.1 h·mg/L, respectively. The average concentrations measured in CSF, ELF and in PBMCs were 0.07 ± 0.03, 0.94 ± 0.46 and 27.1 ± 17.8 mg/L, respectively. The AUC/MIC in plasma, CSF, ELF and in PBMCs under steady-state conditions were 106 ± 32.1, 1.68 ± 0.72, 22.6 ± 11.0 and 650 ± 426 mg·h/L, respectively., Conclusion: Isavuconazole demonstrated moderate penetration into ELF, low penetrability into CSF and high accumulation in PBMCs. Current dosing regimens resulted in sufficient plasma exposure in all subjects to treat isolates with MICs ≤ 1 mg/L., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Alopecia areata (AA) is a common autoimmune disorder. Although its pathogenesis is not fully understood, AA involves CD8 T cell-mediated destruction of the hair follicle. Several treatment options exist; however, there is minimal evidence in the pediatric population. Currently, there are no curative treatments for AA. The literature suggests that Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors may be an effective treat-ment for AA, but evidence in pediatric patients is limited. Here, we report a case of severe pediatric AA treated with topical ruxolitinib, a JAK inhibitor. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(5):378-379. doi:10.36849/JDD.7782.

Background: For Parkinson disease (PD) patients who have been diagnosed with advanced disease that can no longer be effectively controlled with optimized oral or transdermal medications, a range of device-aided therapies (DAT) are available, comprising either deep brain stimulation or infusion therapies providing continuous dopaminergic stimulation. Levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG) infusion is the latest DAT for advanced PD (APD) that was approved in Romania in 2021., Study Question: What is the experience to date in real-world clinical practice in Romania regarding the efficacy and tolerability of LECIG in APD?, Study Design: A retrospective evaluation of 74 APD patients treated with LECIG at 12 specialized APD centers in Romania., Measures and Outcomes: Demographic data and various clinical parameters were recorded, including Mini Mental State Evaluation score or Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test score. Levodopa-equivalent daily dose and the administered doses of levodopa and other PD medications were evaluated at baseline and after starting LECIG treatment. The efficacy of LECIG in reducing daily hours of off time, motor fluctuations, and dyskinesias were assessed. Any percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy system or device complications after starting LECIG treatment were noted., Results: At baseline, patients were taking oral levodopa for a mean of 5.3 times per day, with a high proportion also taking concomitant add-on therapies (dopamine agonists, 86%, monoamine oxidase type-B inhibitors, 53%; catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors, 64%). LECIG treatment significantly reduced daily off time versus baseline from 5.7 h/d to 1.7 hours per day ( P < 0.01). Duration and severity of dyskinesias was also significantly reduced versus baseline, and improvements were observed in Hoehn and Yahr Scale scores. LECIG treatment also allowed a significant reduction in the use of concomitant oral medications., Conclusions: These findings suggest that LECIG treatment is an effective DAT option in APD that can simplify the treatment regimen., Competing Interests: J. A. Szász consultant and speaking honoraria: AbbVie, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GSK, Lundbeck, Novartis, Pfizer, Stada, Teva, and UCB. V. A. Constantin speaking honoraria: AbbVie, Bayer, UCB, Pfizer, Stada, Ewopharma, Lundbeck and Wörwag Pharma. A. O. Dulamea has served as a scientific advisor or speaker for Novartis, Merck, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Genesis Pharma, Krka, Gedeon Richter, Eli Lilly, Wörwag Pharma, Zentiva, Takeda, Janssen, AbbVie, and Stada. C. Tiu speaker's honoraria from Merck, Genzyme, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Pfizer. L. P. Dumbravă consultant and speaking honoraria: Sanofi, Roche, SC Bayer, UCB Pharma, Ipsen Pharma, Bristol Myers Squib, Pfizer, AbbVie, Stada M&D, and Vedra International. A. Ene speaker honoraria: AbbVie, Stada, Pfizer, Genesis, and Worwag. M. Lungu speaker honoraria from AbbVie, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Stada M&D, and Bayer. A. Axelerad speaker honoraria from AbbVie, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GSK, Lundbeck, Novartis, Pfizer, Stada, Teva, UCB, Wörwag Pharma, Sanofi, Krka, Gedeon Richter, Eli Lilly, Zentiva, Takeda, Janssen, Zentiva, Merck, Roche, and Ipsen Pharma. M. Simu honoraria for advisory boards and educational lectures from: AbbVie, Astra Zeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, UCB, Servier, Teva, Merck, Ever Pharma, Roche, and Novartis A. G. Danci speaker honoraria from Teva, Stada and Ipsen Pharma. Sabău Monica consultant and speaking honoraria: Bayer, AstraZeneca, Roche, AbbVie, Pfizer, Novartis, Sanofi, Johnson& Johnson, Merk, Stada, SunWave Pharma, Ewopharma, Krka, and Elly Lilly. C. Falup-Pecurariu received royalties from Elsevier and Springer Verlag honoraria from AbbVie and the International Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Society, outside of the present work. Ş. Strilciuc discloses an academic grant from Pfizer Inc (Delaware, US), unrelated to this manuscript. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) patients are often older and use concurrent medications that increase the potential for drug-drug interactions (pDDIs). This study assessed pDDI prevalence in real-world nmCRPC patients treated with apalutamide, darolutamide, or enzalutamide., Research Design and Methods: Castrated prostate cancer patients without metastases prior to androgen receptor inhibitor initiation were identified retrospectively via Optum Clinformatics Data Mart claims data (8/2019-3/2021). The top 100 concomitant medications were assessed for pDDIs., Results: Among 1,515 patients (mean age: 77 ± 8 years; mean Charlson Comorbidity Index: 3 ± 3), 340 initiated apalutamide, 112 darolutamide, and 1,063 enzalutamide. Common concomitant medication classes were cardiovascular (80%) and central nervous system (52%). Two-thirds of the patients received ≥5 concomitant medications; 30 (30/100 medications) pDDIs were identified for apalutamide and enzalutamide each and 2 (2/100 medications) for darolutamide. Most pDDIs had risk ratings of C or D, but four for apalutamide were rated X. Approximately 58% of the patients on apalutamide, 5% on darolutamide, and 54% on enzalutamide had ≥1 identified pDDI., Conclusions: Results showed a higher frequency of pDDIs in patients receiving apalutamide and enzalutamide vs darolutamide. The impact of these could not be determined retrospectively. DDI risk should be carefully evaluated when discussing optimal therapy for patients with nmCRPC.

Background: Invasive fungal infection (IFI) prophylaxis is recommended in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) during induction chemotherapy. Posaconazole (POSA) is the recommended agent of choice; however, this medication can be associated with QTc prolongation, hepatotoxicity, and drug-drug interactions. Furthermore, there is conflicting evidence for the role of isavuconazole (ISAV) in this setting as an alternative to POSA., Objective: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the use of ISAV prophylaxis for primary IFI prevention in patients with AML undergoing induction. Additionally, the study investigated the use of ISAV trough concentration monitoring and compared these results to the efficacy of POSA therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Other secondary objectives included assessing the rates of toxicities associated with either prophylactic agent. This study analyzed the impact these toxicities had on patient outcomes by examining the need to hold or discontinue therapy. The final endpoint considered the efficacy associated with multiple dosing strategies employed at the study institution. Specifically, this included the use of loading doses or foregoing these when initiating prophylaxis., Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study. Patients included in this study were adults with AML admitted to Duke University Hospital between June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2021, who received induction chemotherapy and primary IFI prophylaxis for at least 7 days. Exclusion criteria included patients who received concomitant antifungal agents and patients who received antifungal agents as secondary prophylaxis., Results: 241 patients met inclusion criteria with 12 (4.98%) participants in the ISAV group and 229 (95.02%) participants in the POSA group. The IFI incidence in the POSA group was 14.5%, while the ISAV group did not have any occurrences of IFI. No significant difference was found in the rate of IFI occurrence between the two treatment groups (p  =  0.3805). Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the use of a loading dose when initiating prophylaxis could impact rates of IFI for this patient population., Conclusion: Due to no difference in incidence, patient specific factors such as concomitant medications and baseline QTc should influence the choice between prophylactic agent., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Thomas LeBlanc, MD, MA has received payments and support to attend meetings from AbbVie, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Agios, BMS/Celgene, Flatiron, GSK, Genentech, Pfizer, and Novartis.

Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) represents a spectrum of lung disorders caused by local proliferation of Aspergillus hyphae in individuals with non-systemic or mildly systemic immunodepression or altered pulmonary integrity due to underlying disease. While long-term systemic antifungal treatment is still the mainstay for management, surgery is considered mainly in rarer invasive disease manifestations such as sinusitis and osteomyelitis. Optimal application of existing antifungal agents with suitable pharmacokinetic properties is important for the treatment of diseases such as CPA, which requires long-term use. Appropriate management of side effects by therapeutic drug monitoring, maintenance of adherence, and assessment of drug resistance to Aspergillus can provide safe and effective treatment in the future. Most available antifungal agents for the management of mycoses in humans have disadvantages that can limit their use in clinical practice. By contrast, second generation antifungals such as triazoles have advantages of extended antifungal spectrum and availability in both oral and intravenous formulations. Isavuconazole, a new extended spectrum triazole, has been shown to be effective against Aspergillus. The safety profile and excellent pharmacokinetic characteristics of isavuconazole make it an attractive option for treatment of invasive fungal infections including CPA. With this drug now available in Japan, new evidence is expected to expand treatment options. This review focuses on the selection of antifungal agents based on national and international guidelines and the characteristics of each agent for their appropriate use in CPA.

Objectives: Myelofibrosis is a rare bone marrow disorder associated with a high symptom burden, poor prognosis, and shortened survival. While allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for myelofibrosis, the only approved and reimbursed pharmacotherapy for non-HSCT candidates in Belgium is ruxolitinib., Methods: These updated recommendations are based on a consensus reached during two meetings and provide guidance for ruxolitinib administration in myelofibrosis patients considering the particularities of Belgian reimbursement criteria., Results and Discussion: In Belgium, ruxolitinib is indicated and reimbursed for transplant-ineligible myelofibrosis patients from intermediate-2- and high-risk groups and from the intermediate-1-risk group with splenomegaly. Our recommendation is to also make ruxolitinib available in the pre-transplant setting for myelofibrosis patients with splenomegaly or heavy symptom burden. Before ruxolitinib initiation, complete blood cell counts are recommended, and the decision on the optimal dosage should be based on platelet count and clinical parameters. In anemic patients, we recommend starting doses of ruxolitinib of 10 mg twice daily for 12 weeks and we propose the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with endogenous erythropoietin levels ≤500 mU/mL. Increased vigilance for opportunistic infections and second primary malignancies is needed in ruxolitinib-treated myelofibrosis patients. Ruxolitinib treatment should be continued as long as there is clinical benefit (reduced splenomegaly or symptoms), and we recommend progressive dose tapering when stopping ruxolitinib., Conclusion: Based on new data and clinical experience, the panel of experts discussed ruxolitinib treatment in Belgian myelofibrosis patients with a focus on dose optimization/monitoring, adverse events, and interruption/rechallenge management.

Background: Vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune disease that causes skin depigmentation. A cream formulation of ruxolitinib (an inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 and 2) resulted in repigmentation in a phase 2 trial involving adults with vitiligo., Methods: We conducted two phase 3, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trials (Topical Ruxolitinib Evaluation in Vitiligo Study 1 [TRuE-V1] and 2 [TRuE-V2]) in North America and Europe that involved patients 12 years of age or older who had nonsegmental vitiligo with depigmentation covering 10% or less of total body-surface area. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to apply 1.5% ruxolitinib cream or vehicle control twice daily for 24 weeks to all vitiligo areas on the face and body, after which all patients could apply 1.5% ruxolitinib cream through week 52. The primary end point was a decrease (improvement) of at least 75% from baseline in the facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI; range, 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating a greater area of facial depigmentation), or F-VASI75 response, at week 24. There were five key secondary end points, including improved responses on the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale., Results: A total of 674 patients were enrolled, 330 in TRuE-V1 and 344 in TRuE-V2. In TRuE-V1, the percentage of patients with an F-VASI75 response at week 24 was 29.8% in the ruxolitinib-cream group and 7.4% in the vehicle group (relative risk, 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9 to 8.4; P<0.001). In TRuE-V2, the percentages were 30.9% and 11.4%, respectively (relative risk, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5 to 4.9; P<0.001). The results for key secondary end points showed superiority of ruxolitinib cream over vehicle control. Among patients who applied ruxolitinib cream throughout 52 weeks, adverse events occurred in 54.8% in TRuE-V1 and 62.3% in TRuE-V2; the most common adverse events were application-site acne (6.3% and 6.6%, respectively), nasopharyngitis (5.4% and 6.1%), and application-site pruritus (5.4% and 5.3%)., Conclusions: In two phase 3 trials, application of ruxolitinib cream resulted in greater repigmentation of vitiligo lesions than vehicle control through 52 weeks, but it was associated with acne and pruritus at the application site. Larger and longer trials are required to determine the effect and safety of ruxolitinib cream in patients with vitiligo. (Funded by Incyte; TRuE-V1 and TRuE-V2 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT04052425 and NCT04057573.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)