Search

Fournier's gangrene (FG) is a rare form of necrotizing fasciitis of the perineal, genital, or perianal region. It is characterized by an aggressive course and high mortality rate, over 20%. FG demands immediate treatment including resuscitation maneuvers, intravenous antibiotic therapy and early surgical debridement. Background/Objectives: The gold-standard treatment for FG is surgical reconstruction. However, up to date, no precise guidelines exist. Thus, we decided to systematically review the literature, focusing on FG contemporary approaches to reconstructive surgery, aiming to analyze the various reconstructive strategies and their specific indications. Methods: A systematic review was carried out according to the PRISMA statement by searching various databases from April 2014 to April 2024, using the terms "Fournier Gangrene OR Fournier Gangrene Reconstruction OR Fournier Gangrene Treatment OR Fournier Gangrene Plastic Surgery OR Necrotizing Fasciitis OR Necrotizing Fasciitis AND Reconstruction". The eligibility criteria included original studies aimed at discussing FG reconstruction with at least three clinical cases. Results: The final synthesis included 38 articles, and 576 reconstructions were described. Of these, 77.6% were minimally invasive strategies (direct closure, secondary healing, grafts, and local random flaps), while more invasive reconstructions (loco-regional flaps based on known vascular anatomy) were adopted in 22.4%. No free flaps were reported. Conclusions: FG requires immediate medical interventions including broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, surgical debridement, adjuvant therapies, and reconstructive surgeries. Taking into account the anatomical characteristics of the inguinal-crural region, skin grafts and local random flaps could offer versatile and effective reconstructions for most FG cases, while the more invasive strategies should be reserved for very few cases. Future research is warranted to define an FG dedicated reconstruction protocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Periocular sebaceous carcinoma (PSC) is a rare, aggressive, and potentially metastatic adnexal malignancy. Due to the ability of PSC to resemble several benign and malignant conditions, diagnosis is often delayed or mistaken. In addition, even with a known diagnosis, choosing the right treatment is still an open debate. For this reason, we decided to review the most up‐to‐date literature on PSC and propose a dedicated procedural protocol to help clinicians when dealing with PSC. A PubMed search was carried out using the terms "Sebaceous Carcinoma", "Adnexal Periocular Cancer", "Sebaceous Carcinoma AND eyelid", "Periocular Sebaceous Carcinoma", and "Ocular Adnexa". Pertinent studies published in English from 1997 up to December 2022 were compared to the selection criteria and if suitable, included in this review. Through the initial search, 84 articles were selected. Of these, 36 were included in the final study. Several papers explored different diagnostic and therapeutic strategies regarding PSC diagnosis and management. In light of the current literature review and the multidisciplinary experience of three clinical centers, a dedicated procedural protocol is proposed. PSC diagnosis may be achieved through accurate clinical evaluation, but it requires histopathologic confirmation, which can be challenging. Dermoscopy, in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy, and optical coherence tomography may facilitate PSC clinical examination, while immunohistochemistry stains may support histological diagnosis. Appropriate disease staging is necessary before choosing the treatment, as local disease requires radically different treatment compared to advanced disease. In addition, recent innovations in nonsurgical treatments, including radio‐chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy, may be a viable option in the most challenging cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: The role of the umbilical scar and its repositioning remains one of the most important surgical steps in the execution of any type of abdominoplasty, including those involving "inverted-t" or "fleur de lys" incisions. A consequence of this is a surgeon's Hamletic dilemma: to keep or not to keep the original umbilical scar? (2) Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on all patients undergoing "T-inverted" abdominoplasty at the Department of Plastic Surgery of the Santa Maria alle Scotte University Hospital, Siena, between January 2018 and December 2020. Twelve months after the surgery we submitted to all patients the U-score questionnaire about their feelings about their umbilicus's appearance. Patients could assign a score from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied) to each of the five items of the score. (3) Results: The average of the scores attributed by the nine patients in whom the navel was preserved is 13 (Range 10–17), while in patients on whom a navel reconstruction was performed, the mean score is 16.8 (Range 12–20). The mean score of patients with a reconstructed umbilicus is, therefore, statistically higher than that of the other group of patients (t-value = 3.88, p = 0.000374) with an average increase of 3.8 points. (4) Conclusions: We can state that the reconstruction of a new navel is the right answer to the Hamletic dilemma in patients having undergone vertical or anchor abdominoplasty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The most effective dissection technique for elevating flaps in body contouring is still controversial, particularly in high-risk massive weight loss (MWL) patients. LigaSure (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) is an energy device commonly used among different surgical specialties to reduce morbidity and improve outcomes. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of LigaSure Impact and LigaSure Small Jaw in body contouring after MWL compared with conventional technique. Patients who underwent abdominoplasty, mastopexy, brachioplasty and thigh lift after MWL at a single center from 1 December 2018 to 1 March 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. In each procedure patients were divided into two groups according to the dissection technique: LigaSure group and monopolar electrosurgery group. Patients characteristics, perioperative details and postoperative complications were evaluated. Fourty-five patients underwent abdominoplasty, twenty-six mastopexy, twenty brachioplasty and sixteen medial thigh lift. Using LigaSure, operative time was longer in abdominoplasty and thigh lift, but shorter in mastopexy and brachioplasty. Although not statistically significant, the amount of blood and serum recorded from drains in the first 36 hours was reduced in LigaSure groups. Additional analgesic intake was reduced with LigaSure as well as postoperative subjective pain. In all body contouring procedures statistically significant difference was found in days of hospital stay favoring LigaSure groups. Complications occurred most frequently in control groups compared to LigaSure groups. LigaSure Impact and LigaSure Small Jaw may be beneficial in improving outcomes because they might reduce fluids drainage, analgesics intake, hospital stay and postoperative complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]