Search

Your search keyword '"Nishizawa, Masaki"' showing total 91 results
Start Over Author "Nishizawa, Masaki"
91 results on '"Nishizawa, Masaki"'

3. The Pivotal Role of Preprint Platforms in Disseminating COVID-19 Research: A Global Investigation of Country-Level Activities

Author

Tsunoda, Hiroyuki, Sun, Yuan, Nishizawa, Masaki, Liu, Xiaomin, Amano, Kou, Kominami, Rie, Goos, Gerhard, Founding Editor, Hartmanis, Juris, Founding Editor, Bertino, Elisa, Editorial Board Member, Gao, Wen, Editorial Board Member, Steffen, Bernhard, Editorial Board Member, Yung, Moti, Editorial Board Member, Goh, Dion H., editor, Chen, Shu-Jiun, editor, and Tuarob, Suppawong, editor

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Hadronic Interaction Model Dependence in Cosmic Gamma-ray Flux Estimation Using an Extensive Air Shower Array with a Muon Detector

Author

Okukawa, Sousuke, primary, Katayose, Yusaku, additional, Anzorena, Marcos, additional, Asano, Shunta, additional, Condori, Cesar, additional, Fuente, Eduardo, additional, Gomi, Asuka, additional, Hibino, Kinya, additional, Hotta, Naoki, additional, Jimenez-Meza, Ana, additional, Kato, Chihiro, additional, Kato, Sei, additional, Kawashima, Teruyoshi, additional, Kawata, Kazumasa, additional, Koi, Tatsumi, additional, Kojima, Hiroshi, additional, Kurashige, Daichi, additional, Lozoya, Jorge, additional, Mayta, Rosa, additional, Miranda, Pedro, additional, Munakata, Kazuoki, additional, Nagaya, Kaito, additional, Nakamura, Yoshiaki, additional, Nakazawa, Yuuki, additional, Nina, Carlos, additional, Nishizawa, Masaki, additional, Ogio, Shoichi, additional, Ohnishi, Munehiro, additional, Oshima, Akitoshi, additional, Raljevich, Mirko, additional, Rivera, Hugo, additional, Saito, Toshiharu, additional, Sakakibara, Yohei, additional, Sako, Takashi, additional, Sako, Takashi K., additional, Shibata, Shoichi, additional, Shiomi, Atsushi, additional, Subieta, Martin, additional, Tajima, Norio, additional, Takano, Wakiko, additional, Takita, Masato, additional, Tameda, Yuichiro, additional, Tanaka, Koichi, additional, Ticona, Rolando, additional, Toledano-Juarez, Ivan, additional, Tsuchiya, Harufumi, additional, Tsunesada, Yoshiki, additional, Udo, Shigeharu, additional, Yamazaki, Katsuya, additional, and Yokoe, Yoshichika, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

22. The Influence of bioRχiv on PLOS ONE’s Peer-Review and Acceptance Time

Author

Liu Xiaomin, Tsunoda Hiroyuki, Sun Yuan, Amano Kou, and Nishizawa Masaki

Subjects
Publishing, business.industry, Library science, Preprint, Knowledge dissemination, Psychology, business
Abstract

This study examines the relation between acceptance times in preprint publishing and journal publishing. Specifically, we investigated the association between a paper’s posting time to bioRχiv, a preprints server, and journal articles’ peer-review and acceptance time for PLOS ONE. So far, of the total papers published in 1,626 academic journals, the average publication rate of those posted in bioRχiv is 40.67%. Meanwhile, PLOS ONE was the journal that published more papers. Analysis of peer-review and acceptance time of papers published in journals via preprints showed the time these papers are posted in relation to these intervals. The median of the peer-review and acceptance time of the journal submission date that was later than the date of first posting to bioRχiv was 110.00 days, and in the reverse case, it was 139.50 days. Posting to the preprint server before journal submission shows a better order than vice versa. This study provides us a good understanding of the peer-review process. It also gives us good insights into optimizing this process, which would then facilitate paper publication and knowledge dissemination.

Published
2020

23. Study of the Influence of Preprint in bioRχiv for Peer Review and Acceptance Time of PLOS ONE

Author

Tsunoda, Hiroyuki, Sun, Yuan, Nishizawa, Masaki, Liu, Xiaomin, and Amano, Kou

Abstract

This study uses statistical methods to analyze the differences in peer review periods between the processes of preprint based on authors’ order of posting published papers in a given journal. For this purpose, we developed a web crawler that downloaded metadata from bioRχiv and PLOS ONE. The average publication rate of papers posted in bioRχiv accounts for 40.67% of the total thus far. These papers were published in 1,626 academic journals. The journal that published most of these papers was PLOS ONE. Analysis of Peer Review and Acceptance Time (PRAT) of papers published in journals via preprints revealed the timing of posting papers related to these intervals. The median of PRAT of f < s was 110 days, and the median of PRAT of s < f was 139.50 days. If the date order of publishing a paper is the posted date of the preprint before the date of submission to the journal, the PRAT tends to be shorter than when the date order of publishing a paper is the posted date of the preprint after the date of submission to the journal.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

46. The influence of bioRχiv on PLOS ONE's peer‐review and acceptance time.

Author

Tsunoda, Hiroyuki, Sun, Yuan, Nishizawa, Masaki, Liu, Xiaomin, and Amano, Kou

Subjects
PREPRINTS, SCHOLARLY periodicals, PERIODICAL publishing, INFORMATION dissemination, BIBLIOMETRICS, SCHOLARLY communication, SCHOLARLY peer review
Abstract

This study examines the relation between acceptance times in preprint publishing and journal publishing. Specifically, we investigated the association between a paper's posting time to bioRχiv, a preprints server, and journal articles' peer‐review and acceptance time for PLOS ONE. So far, of the total papers published in 1,626 academic journals, the average publication rate of those posted in bioRχiv is 40.67%. Meanwhile, PLOS ONE was the journal that published more papers. Analysis of peer‐review and acceptance time of papers published in journals via preprints showed the time these papers are posted in relation to these intervals. The median of the peer‐review and acceptance time of the journal submission date that was later than the date of first posting to bioRχiv was 110.00 days, and in the reverse case, it was 139.50 days. Posting to the preprint server before journal submission shows a better order than vice versa. This study provides us a good understanding of the peer‐review process. It also gives us good insights into optimizing this process, which would then facilitate paper publication and knowledge dissemination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

49. NII Technical Report (NII-2009-010J)：Evaluation of Japanese Universities'Research Activity based on the Number of Awards of Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research- 2007 Fiscal Year - Ⅲ．Biosciences

Author

Nomura, Hiroyasu, Mitsuda, Yoshitaka, Maeda, Masafumi, Maebashi, Itaru, Negishi, Masamitsu, Shibayama, Morio, Nishizawa, Masaki, and Sun, Yuan

Subjects
Technical Report, テクニカルレポート
Abstract

The system of Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan is one of the oldest ones, which is the funding system for researchers belonging to universities and institutes in Japan. The fund was allotted to each researcher by peer review under the application for their own research projects. This is the third report for 2007 fiscal year's version, on the research field of biosciences. The total number of adoption subjects of research projects at 2007 has been summed up for each university and institute on individual research field and compared to those of 2006 which were reported previously.

Published
2009

50. NII Technical Report (NII-2009-008J)：Evaluation of Japanese Universities'Research Activity based on the Number of Awards of Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research- 2007 Fiscal Year - Ⅰ．Humanities and Social Sciences

Author

Nomura, Hiroyasu, Mitsuda, Yoshitaka, Maeda, Masafumi, Maebashi, Itaru, Negishi, Masamitsu, Shibayama, Morio, Nishizawa, Masaki, and Sun, Yuan

Subjects
Technical Report, テクニカルレポート
Abstract

The system of Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan is one of the oldest ones, which is the funding system for researchers belonging to universities and institutes in Japan. The fund was allotted to each researcher by peer review under the application for their own research projects. This is the first report for 2007 fiscal year's version on the research field of humanities and social sciences. The total number of adopted subjects of research projects at 2007 has been summed up for each university and institute on individual research field and compared to those of 2006 which were reported previously.

Published
2009

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results