Search

Patients with wide aortic necks undergoing Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) have been shown to be at a higher risk for neck-related complications. We aim to examine outcomes of EVAR with an endograft exerting minimal outward pressure (Ovation-Endologix) in patients with a large baseline neck diameter.We performed a retrospective single center study, including consecutive patients undergoing EVAR with the Ovation system from May 2011 to April 2021. Patients were divided in Groups 1 and 2 if the 20, 23, 26, 29 mm or the 34 mm proximal diameter main body was used, respectively. According to the instructions for use of the device, for neck diameters 27-30 mm the 34 mm main body is required. Primary endpoint was rate of neck related complications during follow-up, (type Ia endoleak, migration10 mm and neck-related re-interventions) and rate of aortic neck dilatation (AND). AND was determined based on multiple aortic neck diameters that were recorded and compared between the 1-month computed tomography angiography (CTA) after EVAR and the last available follow-up CTA.Secondary endpoints were peri-procedural and follow-up outcomes such as endoleaks, reinterventions and overall mortality.In total 281 patients were included, 222 in Group 1 and 59 in Group 2. Patients in Group 2 presented significantly shorter neck length, higher neck angulation and more common reversed tapered configuration. Median follow-up was 36 months (Range: 6-106). Early and late type Ia endoleak was observed in 4 and 2 patients in each group, respectively (P = 0.063 and P = 0.195, respectively). Distal migration was observed in 2 patients in Group 2 and AND was recorded in 2 patients in each group (P = 0.195). Freedom from the primary endpoint was estimated at 98%, 94%, 94% at 12-, 36-, 60-months for Group 1 and at 98%, 95%, 86% for Group 2 (P-Value 0.266). Probability of survival was 95%, 86%, 75% at 12-, 36-, 60-months for Group 1 and 83%, 77%, 72% for Group 2 (P-Value 0.226).Multivariate regression analysis identified neither Group 1 versus Group 2 nor absolute value of aortic neck diameter as significant predictors of neck-related adverse events. Neck diameters did not display significant differences over time in any of the levels evaluated.EVAR with the Ovation endograft results in low rates of late neck related complications which is also true for patients with wide baseline aortic necks.

This study investigated the role of dual-energy computed tomography (CT) for lesion characterization in patients with peripheral arterial disease manifesting with chronic total occlusions (CTOs). Forty-one symptomatic patients with CTOs underwent dual-energy CT angiography before endovascular treatment. The lesions were subsequently analyzed in a dedicated workstation, and 2 indexes-dual-energy index (DEI) and effective Z (Z

To investigate outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in high risk patients.Bibliographic sources (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL) were searched using combinations of thesaurus and free text terms. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021287207) and reported according to PRISMA 2020. Pooled estimates were calculated using odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) applying the Mantel-Haenszel or inverse variance method. EVAR peri-operative mortality in high risk patients over time was examined with mixed effects meta-regression. The GRADE framework was used to rate the certainty of evidence.The pooled peri-operative mortality in 18 416 high risk patients who underwent EVAR was 3% (95% CI 2.3 - 4%) and has significantly reduced over time (year of publication p = .003; median study point p = .023). The peri-operative mortality was significantly lower in high risk patients treated with EVAR compared with open repair (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.45 - 0.92), but no significant difference was found in overall (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.76 - 1.49) or aneurysm related mortality (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.21 - 1.55). No significant difference was found in overall mortality between high risk patients treated with EVAR vs. no intervention (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.14 - 1.26), but the aneurysm related mortality was significantly lower in the former (HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.14 - 0.63). The peri-operative mortality was higher in high risk than normal risk patients treated with EVAR (OR 2.33; 95% CI 1.75 - 3.10), as was the overall mortality (HR 3.50; 95% CI 2.55 - 4.80). The certainty of evidence was very low for EVAR vs. open surgery or no intervention and low for high vs. normal risk patients.The EVAR peri-operative mortality in high risk patients has improved over time. Even though the aneurysm related mortality of EVAR is lower compared with no intervention, EVAR may confer no overall survival benefit.

Objective: To investigate whether the crossed-limb technique confers better or worse clinical outcomes compared to the standard straight limb configuration in standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: We conducted a systematic review to identify studies comparing outcomes of EVAR with the crossed versus standard limb configuration. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were searched in March 2021 using the Healthcare Databases Advanced Search interface developed by the National Institute for Heath and Care Excellence. The risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Summary estimates were calculated using the odds ratio (OR), risk difference (RD), or mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI), applying the Mantel-Haenszel or inverse variance statistical method. Random-effects models were employed. Results: Four observational studies qualified for inclusion, reporting a total of 1132 patients. All presented contemporary experiences. Baseline clinical characteristics were largely similar between patients with and without the crossed-limb configuration, but the anatomy tended to be less favourable in patients treated with the crossed-limb technique. No statistically significant difference was found in the primary outcomes: limb occlusion (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.65 – 3.19), type Ib endoleak (RD 0.01, 95% CI -0.03 – 0.04), type III endoleak (RD 0.01, 95% CI -0.01 – 0.03); or secondary outcomes: perioperative mortality (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.03 – 0.03), type Ia endoleak (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.03 – 0.02), type II endoleak (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.51 – 3.74), procedure duration (MD 18.07 min, 95% CI -1.14–37.29). Inconsistency across studies was low for all outcomes. The studies were judged to be of high quality on the NOS. The main bias identified using the ROBINS-I tool was due to confounding. Conclusion: The crossed-limb technique was not found to confer inferior clinical outcomes in the medium term compared to the standard limb configuration in patients who undergo standard EVAR.

Objective To investigate whether there is a correlation between institutional or surgeon case volume and outcomes in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). Data Sources The Healthcare Database Advanced Search interface developed by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence was used to search MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL. Review Methods The systematic review complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines with the protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020213121). Prognostic studies were considered comparing outcomes of patients with rAAA undergoing repair in high and low volume institutions or by high and low volume surgeons. Pooled estimates for peri-operative mortality were calculated using the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), applying the Mantel-Haenszel method. Analysis of adjusted outcome estimates was performed with the generic inverse variance method. Results Thirteen studies reporting a total of 120 116 patients were included. Patients treated in low volume centres had a statistically significantly higher peri-operative mortality than those treated in high volume centres (OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.22 – 1.59). Subgroup analysis showed a mortality difference in favour of high volume centres for both endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR; OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.11 – 2.35) and open repair (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.25 – 1.81). Adjusted analysis showed a benefit of treatment in high volume centres for open repair (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.21 – 2.33) but not for EVAR (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.84 – 2.41). Differences in peri-operative mortality between low and high volume surgeons were not statistically significant for either EVAR (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.59 – 1.89) or open surgical repair (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.87 – 1.63). Conclusion A high institutional volume may result in a reduction of peri-operative mortality following surgery for rAAA. This peri-operative survival advantage is more pronounced for open surgery than EVAR. Individual surgeon caseload was not found to have a significant impact on outcomes.

PURPOSE This study aims to provide data, with the use of computed tomography angiography, regarding the level of bifurcation of the peroneal artery to the anterior perforating branch and the lateral calcaneal branch, in relation to the osseous anatomic structures of the tibial plafond, the medial malleolus and the lateral malleolus. METHODS The study included patients who underwent diagnostic computed tomography angiography of the lower extremities. Measurements were performed in two-dimensional reconstructions and included the perpendicular distance from peroneal artery bifurcation into anterior perforating branch and lateral calcaneal branch to the lowest level of tibial plafond (D1), medial malleolus (D2) and lateral malleolus (D3). The distances were also normalized to the length of the tibia. RESULTS Sixty patients and a total of 115 limbs were enrolled in this study. The mean distance ± standard deviation from peroneal artery bifurcation to tibial plafond (D1) was 4.33 ± 1.12 cm (normalized 0.12 ± 0.03) (range 2.54-8.26 cm), to medial malleolus (D2) was 5.53 ± 1.18 cm (normalized 0.16 ± 0.03) (range 3.27-9.5 cm) and to lateral malleolus (D3) was 6.53 ± 1.17 cm (normalized 0.18 ± 0.03) (range 4.71-10.2 cm), respectively. There was no significant difference between right and left limb measurements (p > 0.05). Females presented lower, but not statistically significant (p > 0.05), D1, D2 and D3 measurements compared to males. CONCLUSION The bifurcation of the peroneal artery takes place at lower level compared to previously published studies and consequently extreme caution should be exercised when performing the posterolateral approach to the ankle. This study adds to the understanding of the relevant vascular anatomy of the region and assists in performing the posterolateral approach to the ankle with safety.

To investigate outcomes of pre-emptive embolization of the aneurysm sac or aortic side branches in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).The review was reported as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 with a preregistered protocol. Bibliographic sources (MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL) were searched using subject headings and free text terms. Randomized controlled trials comparing EVAR with versus without embolization were included. Pooled estimates of dichotomous outcomes were calculated using odds ratio (OR) or risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) applying the Mantel-Haenszel method. Continuous outcomes were summarized using mean difference (MD) and 95% CI applying the inverse variance method. The certainty of evidence was appraised with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. Version 2 of the Cochrane tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Trial sequential analysis assumed alpha = 5% and power = 80%.Four randomized controlled trials were included. No significant difference was found in aneurysm-related mortality (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.03), overall mortality (OR 1.85, 95% CI 0.42-8.13), aneurysm rupture (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.03), type II endoleak-related reintervention (RD -0.07, 95% CI -0.21 to 0.06), procedure time (MD 20.12, 95% CI -11.54 to 51.77), or fluoroscopy time (MD 11.17, 95% CI -11.22 to 33.56). Patients with pre-emptive embolization had significantly lower odds of type II endoleak (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.78) and sac expansion (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.52). The risk of bias was high for all outcomes. The certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes, except for type II endoleak, for which it was low. Trial sequential analysis showed an inconclusive result for overall mortality and type II endoleak-related reintervention but confirmed the advantage of embolization in reducing type II endoleak and sac expansion.Limited, low certainty data suggest pre-emptive embolization confers no clinical benefits in EVAR.

Background Percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and peripheral interventions using the Perclose Proglide suture mediated system has not been adequately studied in patients with synthetic grafts at access sites. Methods We report the use of the Perclose Proglide in 10 patients in whom previously inserted synthetic grafts in the groin were punctured for arterial access (5 for peripheral interventions and 5 undergoing EVAR). In patients undergoing peripheral interventions a single device was used, while in patients undergoing EVAR 2 devices were employed per access site. The preclosing technique was used in every case. Results Hemostasis was achieved in all patients. No complications were observed except for a small laceration and a localized hemodynamically nonsignificant stenosis, without any clinical sequel. Conclusions This small case series indicates the feasibility of percutaneous access with the Perclose Proglide system to perform EVAR and peripheral endovascular interventions in the presence of synthetic grafts in the groin, with promising outcomes.

Lower limb peripheral arterial disease (PAD) characterizes the impairment of blood flow to extremities caused by arterial stenoses or occlusions. Evaluation of PAD is based on clinical examination, calculation of ankle-brachial index and imaging studies such as ultrasound, CT, MRI and digital subtraction angiography. These modalities provide significant information about location, extension and severity of macrovasular lesions in lower extremity arterial system. However, they can be also used to evaluate limb perfusion, using appropriate techniques and protocols. This information may be valuable for assessment of the severity of ischemia and detection of hypoperfused areas. Moreover, they can be used for planning of revascularization strategy in patients with severe PAD and evaluation of therapeutic outcome. These techniques may also determine prognosis and amputation risk in patients with PAD. This review gives a basic overview of the perfusion techniques for lower limbs provided by imaging modalities such as ultrasound, CT, MRI, digital subtraction angiography and scintigraphy and their clinical applications for evaluation of PAD and revascularization outcome.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia syndrome (CCS) is an adverse prognostic factor in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy or surgical procedures. We performed a prospective study to investigate the effect of CCS on treatment outcomes in patients with non-oncogene driven metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing therapy with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. METHODS: Patients were categorized as having cancer cachexia if they had weight loss >5% in the last 6 months prior to immunotherapy (I-O) initiation or any degree of weight loss >2% and body mass index (BMI) 5% during treatment did not affect overall survival (OS; P=0.40). CONCLUSIONS: CCS is associated with reduced PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor efficacy in NSCLC patients and should constitute an additional stratification factor in future I-O clinical trials. Further research at a translational and molecular level is required to decipher the mechanisms of interrelation of metabolic deregulation and suppression of antitumor immunity.

PURPOSE To evaluate foot perfusion in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) using quantitative perfusion multi-detector-row CT and estimate perfusion parameter changes before and after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective study investigated 13 patients (10 men; median age, 72 y; range, 51-84 y) with CLI who underwent CT foot perfusion examinations with a 128-slice dual-energy CT scanner 1 day before and 1 week after PTA. Key parameters such as permeability surface (PS), blood volume (BV), and blood flow (BF) were analyzed and compared statistically. The studies were also examined by a second observer to determine interobserver reproducibility. RESULTS Revascularization was technically successful in all patients, and mean ankle-brachial index increased from 0.36 ± 0.16 to 0.75 ± 0.22. After revascularization, mean BV increased from 1.55 mL/100 g ± 0.83 to 4.51 mL/100 g ± 1.53, BF increased from 16.28 mL/100 g/min ± 4.97 to 31.49 mL/100 g/min ± 6.86, and PS increased from 3.1 mL/min/100 g ± 1.95 to 8.67 mL/min/100 g ± 3.85 (P < .05). Patients with poor response to revascularization who finally underwent amputation presented lower post-PTA perfusion parameters values than patients with significant clinical improvement (P < .05). All measurements demonstrated very good interobserver reproducibility, and intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.91 for BV, 0.94 for BF, and 0.95 for PS. The mean effective dose of the examination was estimated at 0.29 mSv. CONCLUSIONS CT foot perfusion is a reproducible technique that may be a useful modality for the estimation of PTA outcome. Significant restitution of perfusion parameters was observed after successful revascularization.

Background Type Ia endoleak may lead to continuous sac pressurization and late rupture after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Nevertheless, there have been scarce reports suggesting that these endoleaks may occasionally present spontaneous sealing. Taking into account the original sealing mechanism of the Ovation endograft that exploits 2 polymer-filled O-rings, we hypothesize that spontaneous type Ia endoleak sealing may sometimes incur following implantation of this device. We aim to report our experience with spontaneous type Ia endoleak sealing in patients treated with the Ovation endograft. Methods This is a retrospective observational study which included all patients undergoing EVAR with the Ovation endograft in a single institution during a 6-year period. Patients with an intraoperative type Ia endoleak were identified. The primary endpoint was rate of spontaneous sealing. Secondary endpoints were migration, sac expansion, need for reinterventions, secondary type Ia endoleaks, and aneurysm-related and overall mortality. Adherence to the instructions for use (IFU) was evaluated to examine relation with occurrence of endoleak and rates of spontaneous sealing. Results Among 147 patients treated, 8 (5%) left the operation theater with a type Ia endoleak. In 6 patients, the endoleak spontaneously resolved during a maximum of 3 months of follow-up. Among those, 5 cases were treated outside the IFU (2 short necks and 3 with severe angulation), while the sixth was a patient treated inside the IFU but was anticoagulated. In 2 patients, the endoleak did not spontaneously resolve. One presented a conical neck of marginal length and the other circumferential calcifications. Type Ia endoleak was significantly more common among patients treated in an off-label fashion. Conclusions Spontaneous sealing of type Ia endoleak is common after EVAR with the Ovation endograft. Nonadherence to the IFU results in more endoleaks, but it does not seem to reduce possibilities for spontaneous sealing.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to correlate diffusion and perfusion quantitative and semi-quantitative MR parameters, on patients with peripheral arterial disease. In addition, we investigated which perfusion model better describes the behavior of the dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR data signal on ischemic regions of the lower limb. Methods Linear and nonlinear least squares algorithms, were incorporated for the quantification of the parameters through a variety of widely used models, able to extract physiological information from each imaging technique. All numerical calculations were implemented in Python 3.5 and include the: Intra voxel incoherent motion for diffusion and Patlak's, Extended Toft's and Gamma Capillary Transit time (GCTT) models for perfusion MRI. Results Our initial voxel by voxel correlation analysis didn't show any significant correlation based on the Pearson's Correlation metric between diffusion and perfusion parameters. To account for the inherited noise from the raw data, a Gaussian filter was applied to the parametric maps in order for the data to be comparable. By repeating our analysis in the filtered image maps, a good correlation (>0.5) of diffusion and perfusion parameters was achieved. Conclusions Perfusion and diffusion MRI quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters can be obtained through a variety of physiological-pharmacokinetic models. This paper compares most of the widely-known models and parameters in both techniques with data from patients with peripheral arterial disease. Initial analysis showed no correlation in the perfusion parametric maps of DWI and DCE MRI data but a good correlation was obtained after smoothing the parametric maps indicating that perfusion information could be obtained from diffusion MRI images in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

A type-2 endoleak after an endovascular aneurysm repair is the most prevalent type of endoleak, but as the clinical consequence of its diagnosis is uncertain, at present, management decisions are solely based on aneurysm sac growth. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of various computed tomography perfusion parameters for their ability to distinguish high-risk type-2 endoleaks from low-risk type-2 endoleaks after an endovascular aneurysm repair.

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), performed within device instructions for use (IFU), offers improved outcomes. New endograft designs attempt to increase eligibility rates of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients treated within device IFU. We aim to examine the anatomic suitability of the Ovation endograft in our AAA patients and compare it with the other contemporary devices.Three-hundred and seven consecutive elective AAA patients treated during a 5-year period were included. Patient-specific anatomic characteristics were based on endograft IFUs to determine eligibility rates of each system.Two-hundred-twenty-five patients underwent EVAR and 82 open surgery. Ineligibility for device implantation was significantly lower for the Ovation iX system (32%) compared to other devices (AFX-2:49%, Altura:49%, Anaconda:54%, Endurant II:46%, Excluder:52%, Excluder Conformable:39%, Incraft:43%, E-Tegra:52%, Zenith-Alpha:52%; P-Value0.001). The Alto system (next-generation Ovation) achieved an even lower ineligibility rate of 30% (P = 0.008). Short proximal aortic neck length followed by access vessel inadequacy were the primary reasons for ineligibility.The Ovation-iX included more patients with anatomic characteristics within device IFUs resulting in improved eligibility rates compared with the rest of contemporary devices. Its evolution, the Alto system, further improves patient eligibility due to the inclusion of shorter aortic necks.The Ovation iX system presented a significantly better performance and was eligible for use in a greater number of patients in our series of elective AAA repairs, accommodating patient-specific aortic anatomies. Of course, performing EVAR within the endograft's IFU is important to achieve optimal and durable outcomes. The proximal neck length followed by the size of the access vessels are the two more common factors resulting in loss of eligibility. Except for overall eligibility rates, a case by case decision must be made on which is the most suitable device for each patient, based on the specific characteristics of its unique anatomy.

BACKGROUND Narrow aortic bifurcation (NAB) is considered as a risk factor for endograft limb thrombosis. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of narrow aortic bifurcation on outcomes of elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS A systematic review that conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed. We searched electronic bibliographic databases using a combination of controlled vocabulary (thesaurus) and free-text terms to identify relevant studies comparing outcomes of EVAR in patients with NAB versus those with regular aortic bifurcation. Pooled estimates of dichotomous outcomes were calculated using odds ratio (OR) and those of continuous outcomes using mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI). To account for expected heterogeneity, the random-effects model was applied for statistical analysis. RESULTS Six observational studies were included, reporting a total of 2,673 patients (412 with NAR and 2,261 with friendly anatomy). Perioperative mortality was similar between the groups (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.30-4.34, P = 0.85, I2 = 0%). Limb stenosis and kinking requiring additional intraoperative procedures was significantly more common among patients with NAB (OR 3.02, 95% CI 2.16-4.22, P

Objective We investigated whether the well-documented perioperative survival advantage of emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared with open repair would be sustained during follow-up. Methods A systematic review conforming to the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) statement standards was conducted to identify studies that had reported the follow-up outcomes of endovascular vs open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Electronic bibliographic sources (MEDLINE [medical literature analysis and retrieval system online], Embase [Excerpta Medica database], CINAHL [cumulative index to nursing and allied health literature], and CENTRAL [Cochrane central register of controlled trials]) were interrogated using the Healthcare Databases Advanced Search interface (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, United Kingdom). A time-to-event data meta-analysis was performed using the inverse variance method, and the results were reported as summary hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Mixed effects regression was applied to investigate the outcome changes over time. The quality of the body of evidence was appraised using the GRADE (grades of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation) system. Results Three randomized controlled trials and 22 observational studies reporting a total of 31,383 patients were included in the quantitative synthesis. The mean follow-up duration across the studies ranged from 232 days to 4.9 years. The overall all-cause mortality was significantly lower after EVAR than after open repair (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73-0.86). However, the postdischarge all-cause mortality was not significantly different (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.85-1.43). The aneurysm-related mortality, which was reported by one randomized controlled trial, was not significantly different between EVAR and open repair (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.69-1.15). Meta-regression showed the mortality difference in favor of EVAR was more pronounced in more recent studies (P = .069) and recently treated patients (P = .062). The certainty for the body of evidence for overall and postdischarge all-cause mortality was judged to be low and that for aneurysm-related mortality to be high. Conclusions EVAR showed a sustained mortality benefit during follow-up compared with open repair. A wider adoption of an endovascular-first strategy is justified.

Objectives Whether prior endovascular aneurysm repair confers a protective effect in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is not known. We aimed to systematically review and compare the outcomes of rAAA in patients with and without prior endovascular aneurysm repair. Methods We performed a systematic review that conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis. We selected studies comparing the outcomes in patients with rAAA after prior endovascular aneurysm repair (group 1) and those with de novo rAAAs (group 2). We conducted a proportion meta-analysis of perioperative mortality and obtained summary estimates of odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models. Results We included four studies (retrospective observational studies) in quantitative synthesis reporting a total of 719 patients (group 1 (89) group 2 (630)). The perioperative mortality in groups 1 and 2 was 30.4% and 41%, respectively, and there was no statistical significant difference between the groups (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.30–1.43, P = 0.29, I2=58%). However, patients presenting with rAAA following previous endovascular aneurysm repair were more hemodynamically stable (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12–0.90, P = 0.03, I2=74%). The choice between endovascular or open surgery treatment in group 1 did not affect the perioperative mortality (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.41–3.04 P = 0.82, I2=0%). Endoleak types I and III were the main causes of rAAA in group 1. Conclusions Perioperative mortality was similar for rAAA either de novo or after prior endovascular aneurysm repair. However, ruptures in patients with prior endovascular aneurysm repair presented hemodynamically more stable.

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnosis and management of postoperative bile leaks, reporting typical diagnostic findings and available percutaneous techniques in association with other diagnostic and management methods. Methods Thirty-six patients (28 male) were treated for postoperative bile leaks. A biliary leak was clinically suspected in case of persistent leakage of bilious material from a surgical drain, or in the presence of non-specific symptoms such as abdominal pain, fever and anorexia, with or without laboratory alteration of liver enzymes. Radiological confirmation was mainly based on noninvasive methods such as ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. We assessed each treatment by evaluating multiple factors, including technical success (TS) and clinical effectiveness (CE), defined as primary or secondary. We also evaluated overall CE (OCE), defined as leak control with either single or multiple procedures. Results TS and OCE were achieved in all patients (36/36; 100%) with a grade A or B biliary leak. No grade C was observed. There were no major complications. Minor complications were observed in 7/36 (19.4%) patients. No procedure-related deaths occurred. Conclusions In our study, considering all percutaneous techniques, leak healing was achieved in all the patients with a grade A or B biliary leak. These procedures provide a less invasive approach and are increasingly recognized as having a significant role in the management of complications and should be considered as an integral component in the postoperative management of these patients.

Background At a time when endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is increasingly used to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), lesions undergoing open surgical repair (OSR) may present significant differences compared with those treated before wide EVAR availability. We aim to record discrepancies in AAAs surgically treated before and after the introduction of EVAR. Methods We conducted a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of comparative studies. The MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and OpenGrey databases were searched up to October 2017. Outcome measures were anatomic complexity, procedural details, and postoperative outcomes. The random-effects model was used to calculate combined overall effect sizes. Data are presented as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Five observational studies were included. These involved 1,091 patients treated in the pre-EVAR era and 802 in the post-EVAR era. In general, patients undergoing OSR during the first period presented more comorbidities. Increased anatomic complexity was found among patients in the second group as demonstrated by the increased rate of suprarenal clamping (10.5% vs. 22.3%; OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.24–0.50), left renal vein division (10.3% vs. 18.8%; OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25–0.88), iliac aneurysm (28.3% vs. 44.9%; OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.37–0.64), and iliac occlusive disease (13.1% vs. 20.2%; OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39–0.88). Intraoperative use of blood products was greater during the latter period, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Procedural duration was slightly increased in the same group. Morbidity and mortality were similar among the groups. Conclusions After the wide availability of endoluminal grafting, more compromised patients tend to be managed with EVAR, leaving a fitter patient population to undergo OSR. At the same time, anatomic complexity of AAAs undergoing open surgery has considerably increased, requiring advanced proximal aortic surgical expertise to deal with these complex aortic pathologies Overall, morbidity and mortality remained unchanged, possibly due to the counterbalancing effects of these factors.

The purpose of this study is to examine variations of the foramen transversarium and the vertebral artery in computed tomography angiographies (CTa) of the cervical spine, investigate their coexistence, and present possible considerations regarding such variations in spine surgical procedures. Fifty CTa of the neck were retrospectively reviewed. Transverse and anteroposterior diameter of the foramen and diameter of the vertebral artery were measured. Variations of the foramen and the vertebral artery were detected. Cervical CTa of 32 males and 18 females (mean age 66.4 ± 10.78 years), all belonging to the Indo-European race, were reviewed. Variations of the foramen transversarium were found in 17 vertebrae (4.85%) of 15 patients (30%). Duplication of the foramen was the most frequent variation, followed by the open foramen, the absence of the foramen, the triple foramen, and the hypoplastic foramen. Variations of the vertebral artery were found in 7 patients (14%) and asymmetry was found in 12 (24%) patients. Moreover, six patients presented with hypoplastic vertebral arteries (12%). When examining coexistence, 60% of patients exhibiting variations in the transverse foramen were also exhibiting variations or asymmetry in the vertebral artery, compared to 25.7% of patients with no foramen variations (p = 0.02). Vertebral artery injury is not common but may be a disastrous complication during cervical spine surgery. Proper preoperative planning is essential for any surgeon and exact knowledge of the anatomy in each patient is essential. This study strongly recommends the preoperative use of a CTa when suspicion of a variation is present and implied by a foramen variation. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Objectives: To emerge hypoperfusion of lower limbs in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion microperfusion magnetic resonance imaging (IVIM-MRI). Moreover to examine the ability of IVIM-MRI to differentiate patients with severe peripheral arterial disease (PAD) from normal subjects and evaluate the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) results in patients with CLI. Methods: Eight patients who presented with CLI and six healthy volunteers were examined. The patients underwent IVIM-MRI of lower extremity before and following PTA. The imaging protocol included sagittal diffusion-weighted (DW) sequences. DW images were analyzed and color parametric maps of the micro-circulation of blood inside the capillary network (D*) were constructed. The studies were evaluated by two observers to define interobserver reproducibility. Results: Technical success was achieved in all patients (8/8). The mean ankle-brachial index increased from 0.35 ± 0.2 to 0.76 ± 0.25 (p < 0.05). Successful revascularization improved IVIM microperfusion. Mean D* increased from 279.88 ± 13.47 10−5 mm2/s to 331.51 ± 31 10−5 mm2/s, following PTA, p < 0.05. Moreover, PAD patients presented lower D* values as compared to healthy individuals (279.88 ± 13.47 10−5 mm2/s vs 332.47 ± 22.95 10−5 mm2/s, p < 0.05, respectively). Good interobserver agreement was obtained with an ICC = 0.84 (95% CI 0.64–0.93). Conclusions: IVIM-MRI can detect differences in microperfusion between patients with PAD and healthy individuals. Moreover, significant restitution of IVIM microperfusion is found following successful PTA. Advances in knowledge: IVIM-MRI is a safe, reproducible and effective modality for evaluation of lower limb hypoperfusion in patients with PAD. It seems also to be a helpful tool to detect changes of tissue perfusion in patients with CLI following revascularization.

We present a new method of characterizing damage arising from α-recoil cascades in amorphous materials including glasses. The approach taken is topological, yielding information on atom connectivity and utilizing complete sets of orthogonal functions (spherical harmonics and Hermite functions) to compute order parameters. The utility of our new approach is demonstrated by first applying it to models of radiation-damaged crystalline zircon, enabling validation against the standard defect counting method (Wigner-Seitz). We then apply it to a simple model of a glass, obtained by supercooling a Lennard-Jones liquid, for which defect counting methods are inapplicable. The method shows great promise for use in characterizing damage in more complicated glasses, particularly those of interest in the immobilization of nuclear waste, and when used in conjunction with nonequilibrium computer simulation could be a powerful tool to elucidate experimental data on the radiation tolerance of such wasteforms.

Background Endovascular therapy, including aspiration thrombectomy and local thrombolytic therapy, often associated with angioplasty and stent placement, has been described in the literature. The purpose of this study was to review case series of patients with acute mesenteric ischemia treated with endovascular therapy and evaluate their outcomes. Methods An online review using PubMed was carried out to identify all English articles about this topic in the time interval from 2005 to 2016. The following variables were extracted: number of patients, cause of occlusion, symptoms, arteries involved, number of sessions of treatment, technical success, clinical success, recurrence rate, complications, mortality rate, number of patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy or surgical resection of ischemic bowel. Results Eighteen papers met the inclusion criteria and were included. Among the patients with arterial mesenteric ischemia treated with endovascular approach, the technical success rate was high (up to 100%) and data regarding clinical success are encouraging, even though they are few and heterogeneous. Technical success rate and clinical success of patients with acute venous mesenteric ischemia approached with endovascular treatment was 74-100% and 87.5-100% respectively. Conclusions Current advances in endovascular therapies have made these treatments feasible for mesenteric ischemia. Keywords Acute venous/arterial ischemia, interventional radiology, endovascular recanalization, thrombolysis, thromboaspiration Ann Gastroenterol 2017; 30 (5): 526-533

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) continues to pose a significant cause of unexpected mortality in the developed countries with its incidence constantly rising. The indication of elective surgical repair is currently based on the maximum diameter and growth rate criteria which represent an oversimplification of the Law of Laplace stating that the stress exerted in a cylinder or sphere is proportional to its radius. These criteria fail to capture the complex pathophysiology of the aneurismal disease thus often leading to therapeutic inaccuracies (treating large AAAs with a very low actual rupture risk while observing smaller ones with a much greater risk). Aneurysmal disease is mainly a degenerative process leading to loss of structural integrity of the diseased aortic wall which cannot withhold the stresses due to systemic pressurization. Moreover aortic wall degeneration has been shown to be a localized phenomenon and rupture depends on the pointwise comparison of strength and stress rather than a global aortic wall weakening. Ex-vivo mechanical studies have related vessel wall hypoxia to loss of structural endurance and reduced wall strength. Therefore a module to capture in vivo variation of aortic wall blood supply and oxygenation would be of value for the evaluation of AAA rupture risk. Perfusion computed tomography (PCT) imaging represents a novel technique which has been already used to estimate tissue vascularity in several clinical conditions but not aneurismal disease. We hypothesize that PCT could be used as an adjunct tool during AAA diagnostics in order to evaluate aortic wall oxygenation in vivo, therefore providing a possible means to identify weak spots making the lesion amenable to rupture.

Newer generation devices have attempted to accommodate a wider range of aortoiliac anatomies offering endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) to more patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). We aim to examine the anatomic suitability for the ultra-low profile Ovation endograft in our AAA patients and to compare them with other contemporary devices.158 consecutive AAA patients treated with EVAR or open surgical repair (OSR) were tested for EVAR eligibility according to the most commonly used endografts' instructions for use.106 patients underwent EVAR and 52 OSR. EVAR eligibility was higher for the Ovation system (72%) compared to the rest of the devices (Incraft: 63%, Nellix: 60%, Endurant-II: 59%, Excluder: 55%, Zenith-Flex: 36%, Aorfix: 35%, P-value0.001). Non-suitable proximal neck anatomy followed by access vessel inadequacy were the primary reasons for ineligibility.New generation aortic endografts with innovative proximal sealing mechanisms and ultra-low profile delivery systems are increasing patient eligibility for EVAR.

Objectives The aim was to assess peri-operative mortality of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) vs. open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and to investigate whether outcomes have improved over the years and whether there is an association between institutional caseload and peri-operative mortality. Methods Electronic information sources (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and CENTRAL) were searched up to August 2019. A systematic review was carried out according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using a registered protocol (CRD42018106084). Studies were selected that reported peri-operative mortality of EVAR for ruptured AAA. A proportion meta-analysis was conducted, and summary estimates of odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for EVAR vs. open surgical repair were obtained using random effects models. Mixed effects regression models were developed to investigate outcome changes over time and with institutional caseload. Results One hundred and thirty-six studies were included in quantitative synthesis reporting a total of 267 259 patients (EVAR 58 273; open surgery 208 986). The pooled peri-operative mortality of EVAR and open surgical repair was 0.245 (95% CI 0.234–0.257) and 0.378 (95% CI 0.364–0.392), respectively. EVAR was associated with reduced peri-operative mortality (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.51–0.57, p < .001). Meta-regression analysis found decreasing peri-operative mortality over the years following EVAR (p < .001) and open repair (p < .001), and a decreasing OR of peri-operative mortality in favour of EVAR (p = .053). Meta-regression found a significant positive association between peri-operative mortality and institutional case load for open repair (p = .004). Conclusions If EVAR can be done, it is a better treatment for ruptured AAA in view of the reduced peri-operative mortality compared with open surgery. The outcomes of both EVAR and open surgical repair have improved over the years, and the difference in peri-operative mortality in favour of EVAR has become more pronounced. There is a significant association between peri-operative mortality and institutional case load for open repair of ruptured AAA.

Background Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is established as the first-line vascular procedure in patients with lower extremity artery disease. Purpose We aimed to evaluate the technical and clinical effectiveness of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the management of ischemic foot ulcers. Material and Methods All consecutive patients presenting with a foot ulcer at the outpatient vascular surgery clinic of our hospital between June 2009 and June 2015 were evaluated using foot pulse assessment, ankle-brachial index, and duplex scanning. If non-invasive parameters suggested lower extremity artery disease, CT angiography and/or digital subtraction angiography were performed and a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was carried out when feasible during the same session. All patients were followed until healing, amputation, death, or for at least two years. Short- and long-term clinical success was evaluated based on ulcer size and appearance. Patients with worsening ulcers after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty underwent bypass grafting or amputation. Results Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was performed in 161 patients (100%) with stenoses > 50%, including cases lesions > 10 cm and/or multiple/calcified lesions, 144 of which completed the study. In 88 (61.2%) patients, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was performed in the suprapopliteal axis exclusively, in 10 (6.8%) patients in the infrapopliteal axis only, and in 46 (31.9%) in both levels. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was technically successful in 141 (98%) patients. After 3.1 years, the rate of healing was 68%, limb salvage 88%, overall survival 69.5%, and amputation-free survival 64%. Conclusion Our data suggest that percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for ischemic foot ulceration treatment is in the majority of patients feasible, effective, and safe with high rates of healing and limb salvage.

Purpose Imaging modalities such as CTA and MRA provide significant information about the distribution of macrovascular lesions of the limbs in patients with peripheral arterial disease but not for the local microvascular perfusion of the feet. The purpose of this study is to evaluate foot perfusion in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) and estimate percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) results, using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Methods Ten patients (6 male, median age 68 years) with CLI were examined. All patients underwent DCE-MRI of the lower limb before and within first month after PTA. Perfusion parameters such as blood flow (BF), Ktrans, Kep were analyzed and applied for statistical comparisons. The studies were also examined by a second observer to determine inter-observer reproducibility. Results Revascularization was technically successful in all patients and mean ankle brachial index (ABI) increased from 0.37 ± 0.18 to 0.76 ± 0.23, p 0.85 for all perfusion parameters. Conclusions DCE-MRI is a safe and reproducible modality for the diagnosis of foot hypo-perfusion. It seems also to be a promising tool for evaluation of PTA outcome, as significant restitution of perfusion parameters was observed after successful revascularization.

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is a widely performed treatment method due to its minimal invasiveness, reduced need for intensive care unit (ICU), shorter hospitalization and lower 30-day morbidity and mortality compared to open surgery. Endoleak is the drawback of this procedure and is considered the main culprit for re-interventions due to the risk of late aneurysm sac growth and rupture. Type 2 endoleak (T2EL) is the most common type of endoleak which is also the most controversial regarding its management. The aim of this paper is to investigate the potential of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT for the assessment of T2EL after endovascular aneurysm repair using qualitative and quantitative image analysis of the aneurysmal sac.

e21644 Background: Cancer cachexia syndrome (CCS) is a multifactorial inflammatory syndrome affecting a large subset of patients (pts) with NSCLC which in preclinical models negatively impairs antitumor immunity. We conducted a prospective, observational study to investigate the effect of CCS and sarcopenia on the efficacy of ICIs in NSCLC. Methods: CCS was defined as weight loss of > 5% in the last 6 months or any degree of weight loss > 2% in combination with BMI < 20% or baseline skeletal muscle index at the level of the 3rd lumbar vertebra consistent with sarcopenia. Skeletal muscle index was calculated using slice-o-matic tomovision software in the abdominal CT scan before starting ICIs. Results: 83 pts were included in the analysis. Median follow up was 9.5 months. Median age was 66 years, 61.4% had non-squamous histology, 20.5% received ICIs as first and the remaining as second-line therapy. 20.5% of pts experienced partial response (PR), 31% had stable disease (SD) and 48.2% had disease progression (PD). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.4 months and median overall survival (OS) was 10.33 months. 43.4% of the whole group were categorized as having CCS, whereas 63.3% of 30 pts evaluated using tomovision had sarcopenia. CCS negatively affected response rates (p = 0.003) but not response duration (p = 0.266). CCS was associated with reduced PFS (2.46 vs 5.77 months, p = 0.006) and OS (4.8 vs 14.53 months, p = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, CCS independently predicted for shorter OS (HR = 2.01; CI: 1,14-3,54; p = 0.014). Sarcopenia was also associated with reduced OS (5.4 vs 17.9 months, p = 0.012). Analysis on the whole pt population will be presented at the conference. Conclusions: CCS is associated with lower response rates and independently predicts for shorter OS in pts with NSCLC treated with ICIs. Further research on CCS could better define its role as a potential biomarker and a research platform for maximizing immunotherapy efficacy.