Search

Supplementary Figure from A Phase 1a/b Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study of Etigilimab Alone or in Combination with Nivolumab in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors

Purpose:TIGIT (T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif domain) is a co-inhibitory receptor of T-cell and natural killer cell activity. Targeting TIGIT with or without PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibition may enhance antitumor immunity.Patients and Methods:This Phase 1a/b trial was a first-in-human, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation and -expansion study in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Using 3 + 3 design, patients underwent 14-day treatment cycles with anti-TIGIT antibody etigilimab alone (Phase 1a; 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10.0, 20.0 mg/kg intravenously) or in combination with anti–PD-1 antibody nivolumab (Phase 1b; 3.0, 10.0, 20.0 mg/kg etigilimab and 240 mg nivolumab). Primary objective was safety and tolerability.Results:Thirty-three patients were enrolled (Phase 1a, n = 23; Phase 1b, n = 10). There were no dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). MTD for single and combination therapy was not determined; maximum administered dose was 20 mg/kg. The most commonly reported adverse events (AE) were rash (43.5%), nausea (34.8%), and fatigue (30.4%) in Phase 1a and decreased appetite (50.0%), nausea (50.0%), and rash (40%) in Phase 1b. Six patients experienced Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs. In Phase 1a, 7 patients (30.0%) had stable disease. In Phase 1b, 1 patient had a partial response; 1 patient had prolonged stable disease of nearly 8 months. Median progression-free survival was 56.0 days (Phase 1a) and 57.5 days (Phase 1b). Biomarker correlative analyses demonstrated evidence of clear dose-dependent target engagement by etigilimab.Conclusions:Etigilimab had an acceptable safety profile with preliminary evidence of clinical benefit alone and in combination with nivolumab and warrants further investigation in clinical trials.

Supplementary Table from A Phase 1a/b Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study of Etigilimab Alone or in Combination with Nivolumab in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors

BackgroundTargeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO1) pathways is an appealing option for cancer treatment.MethodsThe open-label, phase 1/2 ECHO-203 study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the IDO1 inhibitor epacadostat in combination with durvalumab, a human anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody in adult patients with advanced solid tumors.ResultsThe most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (30.7%), nausea (21.0%), decreased appetite (13.1%), pruritus (12.5%), maculopapular rash (10.8%), and diarrhea (10.2%). Objective response rate (ORR) in the overall phase 2 population was 12.0%. Higher ORR was observed in immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-naïve patients (16.1%) compared with patients who had received previous CPI (4.1%). Epacadostat pharmacodynamics were evaluated by comparing baseline kynurenine levels with those on therapy at various time points. Only the 300-mg epacadostat dose showed evidence of kynurenine modulation, albeit unsustained.ConclusionsEpacadostat plus durvalumab was generally well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors. ORR was low, and evaluation of kynurenine concentration from baseline to cycle 2,day 1, and cycle 5,day 1, suggested >300mg epacadostat twice daily is needed to ensure sufficient drug effect.Clinical trial informationA study of epacadostat (INCB024360) in combination with durvalumab (MEDI4736) in subjects with selected advanced solid tumors (ECHO-203) (NCT02318277).

Background Current imaging methods for prediction of complete margin resection (R0) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are not reliable. Purpose To investigate whether tumor-related and perivascular CT radiomic features improve preoperative assessment of arterial involvement in patients with surgically proven PDAC. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive patients with PDAC who underwent surgery after preoperative CT between 2012 and 2019. A three-dimensional segmentation of PDAC and perivascular tissue surrounding the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) was performed on preoperative CT images with radiomic features extracted to characterize morphology, intensity, texture, and task-based spatial information. The reference standard was the pathologic SMA margin status of the surgical sample: SMA involved (tumor cells ≤1 mm from margin) versus SMA not involved (tumor cells >1 mm from margin). The preoperative assessment of SMA involvement by a fellowship-trained radiologist in multidisciplinary consensus was the comparison. High reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.7) and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test were used to select features included in the logistic regression model. Results A total of 194 patients (median age, 66 years; interquartile range, 60-71 years; age range, 36-85 years; 99 men) were evaluated. Aside from surgery, 148 patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy. A total of 141 patients' samples did not involve SMA, whereas 53 involved SMA. A total of 1695 CT radiomic features were extracted. The model with five features (maximum hugging angle, maximum diameter, logarithm robust mean absolute deviation, minimum distance, square gray level co-occurrence matrix correlation) showed a better performance compared with the radiologist assessment (model vs radiologist area under the curve, 0.71 [95% CI: 0.62, 0.79] vs 0.54 [95% CI: 0.50, 0.59]; P < .001). The model showed a sensitivity of 62% (33 of 53 patients) (95% CI: 51, 77) and a specificity of 77% (108 of 141 patients) (95% CI: 60, 84). Conclusion A model based on tumor-related and perivascular CT radiomic features improved the detection of superior mesenteric artery involvement in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Do and Kambadakone in this issue.

Introduction: ATRi and PARPi combinations kill tumor cells via synergistic modulation of complementary DDR pathways but clinical utility is limited by overlapping toxicities. A genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screen identified DDR alterations that sensitize tumors to the ATRi camonsertib (cam) plus PARPi. Based on preclinical models, tolerability and efficacy of cam plus PARPi given intermittently at low doses in pts with solid tumors with DDR alterations, including BRCA-mutated PARPi-resistant cancers, was evaluated. Methods: Pts (≥ 18 yrs) with relapsed/refractory (r/r) solid tumors with DDR alterations were treated with cam plus talazoparib (tala), niraparib (nira), or olaparib (ola) in 2 phase I trials (NCT04497116, NCT04972110). An adaptive BOIN design was used to optimize dose/schedule. Endpoints were safety, recommended phase II dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics (PK), response (RECIST v1.1 [confirmed/unconfirmed], CA 125, or PSA), clinical benefit rate (CBR; RECIST/tumor marker response or treatment duration ≥ 16 wk), and ctDNA molecular response rate (MRR; best reduction in mean variant allele frequency [mVAF] ≥ 50%). Results: As of Nov 2022, 99 pts were enrolled (61 with ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy, 36 PARPi-pretreated); 43, 27, 29 pts in tala, nira, and ola combinations, respectively. Tumors included ovarian (n=20), prostate (n=13), breast (n=17), bile duct (n=3); most common genotypes were ATM (n=26), BRCA1 (n=19), and BRCA2 (n=33). Grade 3+ toxicities included reversible myelosuppression (neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia in 35%, 28%, and 14% of pts overall; 33%, 16%, and 11% at preliminary RP2Ds), fatigue (3%), and alkaline phosphatase increase (2%). Two pts discontinued treatment due to drug-related toxicity. Forty pts remain on therapy, up to 63 wks. Preliminary RP2Ds: cam 80 mg QD (d 5-7) + tala 0.25 mg QD, 1 wk on/1 wk off; cam 80 mg QD + nira 100 mg QD, 2 d on/5 d off; cam 50 mg QD + ola 100 mg BID, 3 d on/4 d off. As of abstract submission, response rate was 13% in 85 evaluable pts; CBR was 49%. Responders included pts with ovarian (n=6), bile duct (n=2), and breast, pancreatic, and carcinoma of unknown primary (n=1 each) cancers harboring alterations in BRCA1/2 (n=9), IDH1 (n=1), and ATM (n=1). Of 30 evaluable PARPi-pretreated pts, response rate was 23% and CBR was 52%. MRR was 64% (14/22 evaluable); change in mVAF correlated with a change in target lesion size (r=0.63, P=0.001). PK of each drug in the combination was consistent with respective monotherapy PK. Conclusion: Combination of cam plus PARPi at low doses on intermittent schedules was generally well-tolerated with clinical activity in DDR-aberrant tumors, including those pretreated with PARPi. RP2D optimization and translational correlative studies are ongoing. Citation Format: Timothy A. Yap, Siddhartha Yadav, Benjamin Herzberg, Benedito A. Carneiro, Elisa Fontana, Martin Højgaard, Michael J. Pishvaian, Ruth Plummer, Theresa L. Werner, Vaibhav Sahai, Stephanie Lheureux, Elizabeth K. Lee, Niharika B. Mettu, Gregory M. Cote, Joseph D. Schonhoft, Victoria Rimkunas, Ian M. Silverman, Marisa Wainszelbaum, Gerson Peltz, Adrian J. Fretland, Kezhen Fei, Danielle Ulanet, Insil Kim, Maria Koehler, Ezra Rosen, Michael Cecchini. Safety and efficacy of three PARP inhibitors (PARPi) combined with the ataxia telangiectasia- and Rad3-related kinase inhibitor (ATRi) camonsertib in patients (pts) with solid tumors harboring DNA damage response (DDR) alterations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT018.

Background: Limited information is available about treatments and clinical outcomes among men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) whose tumors harbor DNA damage repair (DDR) mutations. Methods: This retrospective chart review study included men diagnosed with mCRPC with ≥1 DDR mutation detected by tumor comprehensive genomic profiling who began a line of therapy on or after July 1, 2014, at oncology centers in the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) consortium. The index date was the initiation of a new therapy in this period, in patients who developed castration-resistant disease and progressed while receiving androgen deprivation therapy. Data on all available lines of therapy post-index were collected. Outcomes reported include time to treatment discontinuation for any reason (TTTD) and overall survival (OS), which were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results for tumor response-related endpoints are forthcoming. Results: A total of 138 patients with mCRPC met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at index was 68 years, and 76% of patients were White. The median follow-up time was 27.1, 15.9, 11.3, and 9.4 months for 1L, 2L, 3L, and 4L+ therapy, respectively. Common sites of metastases included bone (74%), lymph nodes (69%), and lungs (10%). Common tumor DDR mutations included CDK12 (48%), BRCA2 (23%), ATM (21%), and BRCA1 (8%). Assessment of germline mutations was conducted in 114 (83%) patients; the most common was BRCA2 (8%). First-line (1L) treatment information was available for 119 (86%) patients, 2L for 101 (73%), and 3L for 75 (54%) patients. Novel hormonal therapy (NHT; 55%) and taxane chemotherapy (20%) were most common in 1L. Enzalutamide (35%) and abiraterone acetate (14%) were the most frequently used NHTs. Compared to 1L, the proportion of patients receiving NHTs was lower in 2L (33%) and 3L (17%), while the proportion of patients receiving taxanes was higher (36% in 2L and 31% in 3L). In 3L, poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors were used in 21% of patients. Median TTTD was 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.2, 7.2) in 1L, 3.9 months (95% CI: 3.0, 4.6) in 2L, and 4.0 months (95% CI: 3.3, 4.7) in 3L. Median OS was 36.3 months (95% CI: 30.7, 47.8) from the start of 1L, 21.1 months (95% CI: 15.6, 29.3) from the start of 2L, and 14.1 months (95% CI: 9.5, 20.5) from the start of 3L. Conclusions: These findings provide real-world insights about treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with mCRPC harboring DDR mutations. Such insight may provide a helpful benchmark for research aimed at improving clinical outcomes, particularly in later lines of therapy. Citation Format: David B. Solit, Niharika B. Mettu, Shannon J. McCall, Mallika Dhawan, Priyanka J. Bobbili, Maral DerSarkissian, Jasmina Ivanova, Bhakti Arondekar, Jane Chang, Alexander Niyazov, Jocelyn Lee, Risha Huq, Michelle Green, Michelle Turski, Aruna Muthukumar, Tracy Guo, Mei Sheng Duh, William K. Oh. Treatment patterns and overall survival among men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer harboring DDR mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 930.

Purpose:TIGIT (T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif domain) is a co-inhibitory receptor of T-cell and natural killer cell activity. Targeting TIGIT with or without PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibition may enhance antitumor immunity.Patients and Methods:This Phase 1a/b trial was a first-in-human, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation and -expansion study in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Using 3 + 3 design, patients underwent 14-day treatment cycles with anti-TIGIT antibody etigilimab alone (Phase 1a; 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10.0, 20.0 mg/kg intravenously) or in combination with anti–PD-1 antibody nivolumab (Phase 1b; 3.0, 10.0, 20.0 mg/kg etigilimab and 240 mg nivolumab). Primary objective was safety and tolerability.Results:Thirty-three patients were enrolled (Phase 1a, n = 23; Phase 1b, n = 10). There were no dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). MTD for single and combination therapy was not determined; maximum administered dose was 20 mg/kg. The most commonly reported adverse events (AE) were rash (43.5%), nausea (34.8%), and fatigue (30.4%) in Phase 1a and decreased appetite (50.0%), nausea (50.0%), and rash (40%) in Phase 1b. Six patients experienced Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs. In Phase 1a, 7 patients (30.0%) had stable disease. In Phase 1b, 1 patient had a partial response; 1 patient had prolonged stable disease of nearly 8 months. Median progression-free survival was 56.0 days (Phase 1a) and 57.5 days (Phase 1b). Biomarker correlative analyses demonstrated evidence of clear dose-dependent target engagement by etigilimab.Conclusions:Etigilimab had an acceptable safety profile with preliminary evidence of clinical benefit alone and in combination with nivolumab and warrants further investigation in clinical trials.

SummaryBackground Preclinical evidence has suggested that a subset of pancreatic cancers with the G12R mutational isoform of the KRAS oncogene is more sensitive to MAPK pathway blockade than pancreatic tumors with other KRAS isoforms. We conducted a biomarker-driven trial of selumetinib (KOSELUGO™; ARRY-142886), an orally active, allosteric mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 and 2 (MEK1/2) inhibitor, in pancreas cancer patients with somatic KRASG12R mutations. Methods In this two-stage, phase II study (NCT03040986) patients with advanced pancreas cancer harboring somatic KRASG12R variants who had received at least one standard-of-care systemic therapy regimen received 75 mg selumetinib orally twice a day until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary outcome of the study was best objective response (BOR). Results From August 2017 to February 2018 a total of 8 patients with confirmed somatic KRASG12R mutations and a median age of 61.5 years were treated with selumetinib. Seven out of eight (87.5%) had received two or more lines of prior systemic chemotherapy. After a median follow-up period of 8.5 months (range 2 to 20), three patients had stable disease for more than 6 months while receiving selumetinib. No patients achieved an objective partial response. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.0 months (95% CI, 0.8–8.2) and median overall survival (OS) 9 months (95% CI, 2.5–20.9). Conclusion This study in heavily pre-treated pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients suggests alternative strategies beyond single agent MEK inhibition are required for this unique, molecular subset of pancreatic cancer patients. The trial was registered on February 2nd, 2017 under identifier NCT03040986 with ClinicalTrials.gov.

TPS3172 Background: Ulixertinib (BVD-523) is a small molecule inhibitor of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) in development as a novel anti-cancer drug. Early clinical data demonstrated anti-tumor activity, especially for patients with tumors harboring atypical BRAF or MEK1/2 alterations (Sullivan et al., Cancer Discov. 2018;8(2):184-195). Atypical BRAF (non-V600) alterations can be categorized according to characteristics of molecular signaling (Class II or III), are seen in approximately 3% of all human cancers, and there are currently no approved therapies for this indication. Similar to atypical BRAF alterations, the incidence of MEK1/2 alterations are rare in human tumors (< 1 %). Preclinical data have demonstrated activity of ulixertinib in MEK mutant models. Ulixertinib has FDA fast-track designation for patients with solid tumors, other than CRC, with specific BRAF mutations (G469A, L485W, or L597Q). Designed with intent to register, the BVD-523-ABC clinical trial will continue evaluation of ulixertinib in patients with tumors harboring any atypical BRAF or MEK1/2 alteration (NCT04488003). Methods: This multi-center, phase II study, will be conducted in two parts and assess the clinical benefit, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ulixertinib in patients with advanced malignancies. Ulixertinib will be administered at the RP2D of 600 mg BID for 28-day treatment cycles. Eligible patients will have locally advanced or metastatic cancer which progressed following standard systemic therapies, or for which the patient is not a candidate or refused systemic therapy. Planned correlative analyses include reverse phase protein array and transcriptomics of tumor tissue. Part A is open-label and tumor agnostic, except for group 4 and 6 (CRC patients only). Patients will enroll into one of six groups based on BRAF (groups 1-4) or MEK1/2 (groups 5-6) tumor alteration (38 patients per group). Overall response rate (ORR) is the primary endpoint for Part A, with secondary endpoints including duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Part B is tumor histology specific. Patients will be randomized to receive either ulixertinib or physician's choice of treatment in a 2:1 ratio. Up to three specified tumor histologies will be defined, guided by available Part A data (n = 80-100 per histology). The primary endpoint of Part B is PFS, and secondary endpoints include OS, ORR, and DOR. This study has enrolled 43 patients of the planned 228 in Part A at the time of abstract submission. Clinical trial information: NCT04488003.

TPS4181 Background: The mainstay of treatment (TX) for pts with advanced or mPDAC consists of CT, with FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine (gem)/nab-paclitaxel currently representing the front-line standards of care. TX is generally continued until either dis progression (progr) or cumulative toxicity, with pts often reaching a plateau in response after 4-6 mos. For those who have achieved dis control (stable dis or better) on front-line CT, a maint TX strategy that can effectively delay dis progr while preserving quality of life with minimal cumulative toxicity is highly desirable. However, aside from PARP inhibition in the subset of PDAC pts with gBRCA mutated dis, there is no current standard of care in this maint setting. Ival is a pan-HDAC (histone deacetylation) inhibitor that increases histone acetylation (HA), suppresses PDAC cell proliferation, and promotes apoptosis in PDAC cell lines in a dose-dependent manner. It has demonstrated synergy with 5-FU in cholangiocarcinoma cell lines and shows promising antitumor activity when combined with cap in syngeneic PDAC mouse models. On these bases, we are conducting a ph1b/randomized ph2 trial of ival plus cap vs cap alone in the maint setting for pts with mPDAC who have not progressed on front-line FOLFIRINOX. Methods: Key eligibility criteria include pts with mPDAC; no evidence of dis progr following at least 16 wks of front-line FOLFIRINOX at full or modified doses; ECOG PS 0-1; and no known gBRCA1/2 mutation. The study includes an initial dose-esc ph1b evaluating 3 dose levels of ival, (60, 125, and 250mg/m2 iv weekly on days 1 and 8) in combination (comb) with cap (1000mg/m2 po BID on days 1-14) of a 21-day cycle, using a standard 3 + 3 dose-esc design. Of note, ival 250 mg/m2 represents the RP2D identified in prior clinical studies of this agent both as monotherapy in solid tumors and in comb with gem/erlotinib in advanced PDAC pts. In the ph2 portion, pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive either ival plus cap or cap alone, in 21-day cycles, until dis progr, with tumor assessments occurring at 6-wk intervals. Blood will be collected at pre-specified serial timepoints for pharmacodynamic assessments, including HA of PBMCs. Primary endpoint for ph2 is investigator-adjudicated PFS. The primary analysis will compare PFS distributions in the ival/cap and cap alone arms using a one-sided log rank test with an alpha = 0.10. The assumed true 6-mo PFS rates are 35% (cap), based on historic data, and 60% (ival/cap), which corresponds to an HR of 0.487. Assuming an accrual duration of 18 mos and a dropout/lost to follow-up rate of 10%, the estimated total number of pts in the randomized ph2 portion is 52 (26 per arm). Enrollment is expected to being in spring 2022 across 25 U.S. sites.

2651 Background: Etigilimab (etig), a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody, blocks TIGIT interaction with PVR (poliovirus receptor) and inhibits downstream signalling with target cell killing. Etig +/- nivolumab (nivo) showed acceptable safety and preliminary activity in a FIH Phase 1a/b study in solid tumors. ACTIVATE, an open-label Phase 1b/2 basket study is evaluating further efficacy, safety, tolerability and PK/PD of etig+nivo. This is a preliminary efficacy and safety analysis from ACTIVATE. Methods: Subjects with advanced/metastatic solid tumors without curative/standard of care therapies are given IV etig+nivo Q2W until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Six open cohorts are enrolling in parallel: endometrial cancer (post-front-line platinum), endometrial cancer (2-3 prior lines), PD-L1+ checkpoint-inhibitor-naïve (CPI-n) cervical cancer, rare cancers (germ cell tumor (GCT), sarcoma, uveal melanoma), ovarian cancer (post-front-line platinum) and TMB-h/MSS, (TMB >10mut/mb) tumors. Tumor assessments are done every 8 weeks following baseline scan. Primary endpoint is investigator-assessed ORR by RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints include duration of response and safety. Results: Of 27 efficacy-evaluable subjects enrolled in the 6 open cohorts with minimum 1 staging scan or radiological/clinical progression at data cut-off of 02/10/22, 12 had clinical benefit with 1 complete response (CR), 2 partial responses (PRs) and 9 stable diseases (SDs) and 15 had radiological/clinical progressive disease (PD), with an overall response rate (ORR) of 11% and disease control rate (DCR) of 44%. Conclusions: Etig+nivo is safe and well tolerated with no new safety signals. Early efficacy was noted in cervical cancer (1CR, 1PR and 1SD) and uveal melanoma (3 SDs >20 weeks). Encouraging activity was also noted in ovarian cancer and post-CPI treated TMB-H/MSS NSCLC. These early data support continued evaluation of the combination of etig+nivo. Clinical activity was notable as below. Clinical trial information: NCT04761198. [Table: see text]

3082 Background: RP-3500 is a selective and potent oral ATRi in development for advanced solid tumors harboring loss-of-function (LOF) alterations in genes associated with ATRi sensitivity. We determined whether ctDNA can facilitate enrollment/monitoring of pts treated with RP-3500. Methods: Serial plasma samples collected at baseline (BL, 99 pts) and early timepoints on therapy (89 pts, 3-9 weeks [wks]) were profiled for ctDNA (Tempus xF or Guardant360). Targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) (SNiPDx panel) was performed on matched peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumor samples collected at BL. Molecular ctDNA response (MR) was defined as ≥50% reduction in mean variant allele frequency (VAF) from BL to any timepoint ≤9 wks on-therapy. Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) or germline alterations were excluded from the analysis. Efficacy was assessed in pts treated with > 100 mg RP-3500/day with ≥1 post-BL response assessment. Endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and clinical benefit rate (CBR; CR/PR by RECIST1.1 or PSA/CA-125, or > 16 wks on treatment). Results: BL ctDNA was detected in 82% (81/99) of pts. Eligibility alterations were evaluable by the ctDNA panel in 61% (60/99) of pts, excluding structural/copy number variants and genes/exons not on the panel. Percent agreement between BL ctDNA and local eligibility NGS test was 93% (56/60). CH variants were identified in 26 pts (1-14 per pt); median VAF was 0.4% (0.1-12.4%). Two pts with pathogenic ataxia-telangiectasia mutated ( ATM) alterations were determined to be from CH. MRs were observed in 44% (24/55) of pts with median time to MR of 3.3 wks and were across tumors harboring ATM (10/20), BRCA2 (7/10), BRCA1 (4/15), CDK12 (1/3), PALB2 (1/3) and RAD51C (1/1) pathogenic alterations. Four pts with BRCA1 mutant tumors had MRs, 2 of whom (breast cancer) had received prior PARPi and had confirmed BRCA1 reversion mutations and clinical benefit (CB). One pt with g ATM pancreatic cancer with CB had > 90% reduction in KRAS mutant VAF at 3 wks. MR was associated with longer mPFS (29 vs 12 wks, p = 0.0002) and significantly higher CBR (17/22 (77%) vs. 8/28 (29%); p = 0.001) than those without MR. Pts with MRs not achieving CB (N = 5) included 4 with RP-3500 dose interruptions/reductions and 1 who discontinued early (10 wks) due to clinical progression but with decreased target lesions and stable disease. Conclusions: ctDNA testing is a reliable method to detect DNA damage repair LOF alterations but is limited to alterations and genes/exons covered by the ctDNA test. CH alterations are frequent, especially for ATM, thus matched normal analysis is preferred. Changes in ctDNA as early as 3 wks were associated with improved outcomes and may be useful for evaluating drug activity in heterogenous tumors outside of traditional efficacy endpoints. Clinical trial information: NCT04497116.

TPS4180 Background: SY-5609 is an oral, selective, potent CDK7 inhibitor that targets two fundamental processes in cancer: transcription and cell cycle control. Early results from the Phase 1 dose escalation portion in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors reported improved tolerability of the intermittent 7 days on followed by 7 days off (7/7) schedule with ongoing dose escalation beyond the continuous daily dosing maximum tolerated dose. Single-agent clinical activity was demonstrated with durable stable disease, target lesion regressions, and reduction in tumor markers observed in multiple tumor types, notably in pancreatic cancer with a disease control rate (DCR) of 38.5% (Sharma 2021). Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a 5-year survival rate of 11% (ACS Cancer Facts and figures, 2022) with limited treatment options and therefore, is a disease in need of novel effective therapies. Oncogenic KRAS mutations are prevalent in PDAC. Mutant KRAS is a potent stimulator of mitogenic MAPK signaling and downstream transcriptional programs for cell proliferation. Preclinical studies have shown that CDK7 inhibition via SY-5609 inhibits tumor growth in KRAS mutant PDAC xenograft models, in many cases leading to regressions. SY-5609 also potentiates gemcitabine (gem) activity in PDAC cells in vitro and in xenografts in vivo (Henry 2021). Therefore, combining SY-5609 with gem +/- nab-paclitaxel (nab-pac) offers a potential new treatment strategy for metastatic PDAC (mPDAC). The expansion portion of this Phase 1 study will evaluate SY-5609 in combination with gem +/- nab-pac in mPDAC pts. Gem +/- nab-pac will be administered on a biweekly schedule as it has shown better tolerability and similar clinical activity compared to the standard of care (SOC) administration schedule (Rehman 2020). Methods: This is an ongoing Phase 1, multi-center study in select solid tumors, amended to open expansion cohorts for mPDAC and expected to enroll approximately 80 mPDAC pts who have progressed on SOC treatments. Objectives of the expansion cohorts include evaluation of safety and efficacy of SY-5609 in combination with gem +/- nab-pac. Key objectives of the two parallel safety lead-in cohorts 1) SY-5609 + gem and 2) SY-5609 + gem + nab-pac are safety and determination of the recommended combination dose of the doublet and triplet for subsequent cohort expansions using a 3+3 escalation design. Key objectives of expansion cohorts are to describe efficacy, defined by progression-free survival, overall response rate, and DCR. Additional objectives include evaluation of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of SY-5609 in combination with gem +/- nab-pac. SY-5609 will be administered orally once daily on a 7/7 regimen and gem +/- nab-pac will be administered intravenously, in a 4-week cycle. The expansion portion is now open to enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT04247126.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma commonly presents as metastatic disease and harbors a dire prognosis due to its aggressive behavior, propensity for resistance to therapies, and lack of targetable driver mutations. Additionally, despite advances in other cancers, immunotherapy has been ineffective in this disease thus far and treatment remains centered around cytotoxic chemotherapy. Here, we present a case of a patient with pancreatic adenocarcinoma harboring both high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and HER2 amplification. After an initial response to standard-of-care chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX followed by progression, she was treated with dual immune checkpoint blockade, which resulted in a period of disease control. This was complicated by the development of autoimmune hypophysitis and an incidental finding of brain metastasis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Her extracranial disease progressed while receiving stereotactic radiosurgery, with findings of lymphangitic spread in her lungs, and her treatment was changed to gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel with trastuzumab. This resulted in a degree of extracranial disease control, though she experienced progressive brain metastases despite radiation and therapeutic switch to lapatinib and trastuzumab. Ultimately, the patient developed leptomeningeal disease which was not controlled by intrathecal trastuzumab. Given the rarity of central nervous system metastasis, HER2 amplification, and MSI in pancreatic cancer, this patient's presentation represents a confluence of multiple unique features. This case highlights the clinical value of up-front next-generation sequencing in metastatic pancreatic cancer and the ability of pancreatic cancer with actionable molecular variants to develop atypical sites of disease and adaptive resistance.

Background Peritoneal surface dissemination (PSD) of gastrointestinal and ovarian cancers carries a poor prognosis. Although cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy has emerged as a treatment option for this patient population, only a minority of patients benefit from this approach. This finding highlights the need for novel approaches to this disease. Previous data have shown that the local treatment of orthotopic tumors in syngeneic murine models with the oncolytic virus talimogene laherparepvec (TL) converts ‘cold’ immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments into ‘hot’ immune microenvironments that support the regression of tumors. We hypothesize that intraperitoneal (IP) delivery of TL will be safe and tolerable and demonstrate clinical activity in patients with PSD of gastrointestinal (GI) and ovarian cancers. Methods We are conducting the TEMPO Trial (NCT03663712), a non-randomized, open-label Phase I trial of IP TL in patients with stage IV PSD from GI or ovarian tumors enrolled at University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Duke Cancer Institute, and Wake Forest University School of Medicine. There will be two stages in this study, a Dose Escalation Cohort, and a Dose Expansion Cohort. In the Dose Escalation Cohort, three subjects will be enrolled at the starting dose of 4 × 106 PFU, and the dosing will continue in a standard ‘3+3’ dose escalation scheme. If the starting dose is tolerated, higher doses of 4 × 107 and 4 × 108 PFU will be evaluated. Once the MTD is determined, six subjects will be enrolled in the Dose Expansion Cohort at the MTD. All subjects will be dosed with IP TL once every two weeks for up to 4 doses (in addition to the initial seroconversion dose). The primary objective is to evaluate the toxicity profile. The statistical analyses will be only descriptive and performed on the intent to treat, per protocol, and safety populations.We hypothesize that IP TL leads to coordinated interactions between resident peritoneal innate and adaptive immunity. We will delineate these interactions by evaluating peritoneal exudates to assess a) treatment-related changes in peritoneal cytokine levels using multiplex cytokine analysis and b) resident peritoneal immune cell phenotype and function with flow cytometry methods. Plasma and urine fluid samples will be analyzed for viral load. Results N/A Conclusions This study will test the safety, tolerability, and preliminary clinical activity of IP TL; the results will be relevant to inform future investigations of local oncoimmunotherapies in patients with PSD, a highly unmet need population that currently has limited therapeutic options. Acknowledgements N/A Trial Registration Registered at clinicaltrials.gov- https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03663712. The identifier is NCT03663712 Ethics Approval This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Duke Cancer Institute, and Wake Forest University School of Medicine. Consent N/A References N/A

Cotargeting vascular endothelial growth factor and programmed cell death 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1 may produce anticancer activity in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The clinical benefit of atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy and bevacizumab remains unclear for the treatment of mCRC.To assess whether the addition of atezolizumab to capecitabine and bevacizumab therapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with refractory mCRC and to perform exploratory analyses among patients with microsatellite-stable (MSS) disease and liver metastasis.This double-blind phase 2 randomized clinical trial enrolled 133 patients between September 25, 2017, and June 28, 2018 (median duration of follow-up for PFS, 20.9 months), with data cutoff on May 4, 2020. The study was conducted at multiple centers through the Academic and Community Cancer Research United network. Adult patients with mCRC who experienced disease progression while receiving fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, bevacizumab, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapy (if the patient had a RAS wild-type tumor) were included.Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive capecitabine (850 or 1000 mg/m2) twice daily on days 1 to 14 and bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg) on day 1 plus either atezolizumab (1200 mg; investigational group) or placebo (placebo group) on day 1 of each 21-day cycle.The primary end point was PFS; 110 events were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.65 with 80% power (1-sided α = .10). Secondary end points were objective response rate, overall survival (OS), and toxic effects.Of 133 randomized patients, 128 individuals (median age, 58.0 years [IQR, 51.0-65.0 years]; 77 men [60.2%]) were assessed for efficacy (82 in the investigational group and 46 in the placebo group). Overall, 15 patients (11.7%) self-identified as African American or Black, 8 (6.3%) as Asian, 1 (0.8%) as Pacific Islander, 101 (78.9%) as White, 1 (0.8%) as multiple races (Asian, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and White), and 2 (1.6%) as unknown race or unsure of race. Microsatellite-stable disease was present in 110 patients (69 in the investigational group and 41 in the placebo group). Median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI, 4.1-6.4 months) in the investigational group and 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.2-6.2 months) in the placebo group (1-sided log-rank P = .07, a statistically significant result; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.52-1.09). Among patients with MSS and proficient mismatch repair, the HR for PFS was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.44-0.99). The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events in the investigational vs placebo groups were hypertension (6 patients [7.0%] vs 2 patients [4.3%]), diarrhea (6 patients [7.0%] vs 2 patients [4.3%]), and hand-foot syndrome (6 patients [7.0%] vs 2 patients [4.3%]). One treatment-related death occurred in the investigational group. In the investigational group, the response rate was higher among patients without liver metastasis (3 of 13 individuals [23.1%]) vs with liver metastasis (4 of 69 individuals [5.8%]). The benefit of atezolizumab for PFS and OS was greater among patients without vs with liver metastasis (primary analysis of PFS: HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.27-1.47] vs 0.77 [95% CI, 0.51-1.17]; OS: HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.11-1.02] vs 1.14 [95% CI, 0.72-1.81]).In this randomized clinical trial, the addition of atezolizumab to capecitabine and bevacizumab therapy provided limited (ie, not clinically meaningful) clinical benefit. Patients with MSS and proficient mismatch repair tumors and those without liver metastasis benefited more from dual inhibition of the vascular endothelial growth factor and programmed cell death 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1 pathways.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02873195.

Background: RP-3500 is a novel potent and selective ATRi. A genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9-based screening platform (SNIPRx) was utilized to identify and validate synthetic lethal (SL) genomic alterations that predict sensitivity to RP-3500. This is the first presentation of data from the ongoing Phase I TRESR (Treatment Enabled by SNIPRx) study. METHODS: Pts with advanced solid tumors harboring RP-3500 sensitizing alterations were recruited. Pts received oral RP-3500 in 21-day cycles on different doses and schedules using a BOIN design. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies were conducted in serial tumor and/or blood samples. Biomarker tests included somatic and germline NGS, including zygosity studies, ATM and γH2AX IHC, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). RESULTS: 62 pts (mean age 62 y, 42% males, 43% ≥5 prior lines of therapy) received RP-3500 (range: 1–8+ cycles). 44 pts remained on RP-3500 at the June 4, 2021, data cut-off. Tumors with ATM (n=26), BRCA1/2 (n=16), CDK12 (n=5) and other (n=20) molecular alterations were included. Germline (22 germline and 15 somatic, 25 pending) and zygosity status (10 bi-allelic and 5 mono-allelic, 46 pending) will be presented. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were mostly Grade (G)1 and transient. TRAEs occurring in >10% of pts were limited to anemia (all grades 37%, G3 26%, G4–5 0%) and fatigue (all grades 13%, G3 2%). Other ≥G3 TRAEs occurred in 50%) in ctDNA were observed in 8/14 evaluable pts and correlated with antitumor activity (Pearson correlation coefficient =0.65; p-value =0.015). Of 31 pts evaluable for response, 14 (45%) had tumor regression on at least 1 radiologic evaluation. Objective responses were seen in 6 pts: 4 RECISTv1.1 partial responses in tumors with CDK12 and BRCA1 alterations (2 confirmed; 2 unconfirmed), and 2 PCWG3 in tumors with ATM loss. Six pts had stable disease ≥4 cycles. CONCLUSIONS: The TRESR study represents the largest biomarker-driven FIH trial for a single agent ATRi and validates prospective pt selection based on the presence of SL genomic alterations. RP-3500 shows a robust PK/PD profile, preliminary anti-tumor activity, and predictable and manageable on-target anemia ( Citation Format: Timothy Yap, Elizabeth Lee, David Spigel, Elisa Fontana, Martin Højgaard, Stephanie Lheureux, Niharika B. Mettu, Louise Carter, Ruth Plummer, Danielle Ulanet, Peter Manley, Ying Jiang, Ezra Rosen. First-in-human biomarker-driven phase I TRESR trial of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related inhibitor (ATRi) RP-3500 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors harboring synthetic lethal (SL) genomic alterations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr CC04-01.

2555 Background: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) contribute to an immunosuppressive tumor environment and are a barrier to immune therapy. CD33 signaling in immature myeloid cells promotes expansion of MDSC and production of immunosuppressive factors. AMV564 is a potent T cell engager that selectively depletes MDSC while promoting T cell activation and proliferation, via preferential binding to areas of high CD33 density. Methods: In this 3+3 dose escalation study, patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors for whom no recognized standard therapy exists received AMV564 once daily via subcutaneous (SC) injection on Days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 21-day cycle, either alone or in combination with pembrolizumab (200 mg IV q3w). Study endpoints included incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary anti-tumor activity (using RECISTv1.1 criteria). Results: As of January 29, 2021, 20 patients were dosed in 3 monotherapy dose cohorts (15, 50, and 75 mcg/day), and 10 patients were dosed in 3 combination therapy cohorts (5, 15, and 50 mcg/day). Enrolled patients were: median age 64 years, 47% female, had received median 3.5 prior lines of therapy; 7 patients (35%) had received prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy (6 monotherapy patients, 1 combination therapy patient). No dose-limiting toxicity was observed and a maximum-tolerated dose was not reached in either the monotherapy or combination therapy cohorts. The most common treatment-related AEs (occurring in > 10% of patients, in order of decreasing frequency) in the monotherapy cohort were pyrexia, injection site reactions, fatigue, anemia, hypotension, pruritis, chills, and nausea. There were 2 cases of grade 2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) at 75 mcg/day, both of which resolved after anti-IL6 therapy and study treatment was resumed. The most common treatment-related AEs in the combination cohorts (> 10% frequency) were injection site reaction, pyrexia, fatigue, pruritis, and anemia. No cases of CRS were noted in the combination cohorts. In preliminary PK analysis, estimated median plasma half-life for AMV564 after SC injection was > 48 hours, with dose-related increases in peak plasma concentration. Clinical responses were seen with monotherapy and combination therapy, including a complete response (CR) in a monotherapy-treated patient with ovarian cancer refractory to all standard therapies and anti-PD-1 therapy. Conclusions: AMV564 was well tolerated across multiple dose levels as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab. Subcutaneous injection resulted in clinically relevant plasma exposures. Single-agent and combination therapy anti-tumor activity was observed. Further exploration of AMV564 clinical efficacy in expansion cohorts is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04128423.

228 Background: Gastric and esophageal adenocarcinomas are a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Many of these patients (pts) present with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic disease and are treated with combination cytotoxic chemotherapy. Single agent P is FDA approved for patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJ) whose tumors have a combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1 after disease progression on or after two lines of therapy including fluoropyrimidine and platinum and her2/neu-targeted therapy (if indicated). More effective therapy is needed earlier in the disease trajectory. We conducted a single-arm phase II trial to establish the safety and efficacy of first-line C and O + P. Methods: Pts with previously untreated metastatic GE adenocarcinoma regardless of PDL-1 status received intravenous (IV) P 200mg with IV O 130mg/m2 every three weeks and oral C 850mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days on/7 days off. After the 6 patient safety cohort, pts first completed a biomarker cycle that included fresh tumor biopsy before P and one week after P before chemotherapy started. Archived FFPE tumor samples were also obtained from all pts with available tissue. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included response rate (RR) and overall survival (OS). Results: 36 pts were enrolled and 34 pts were evaluable for efficacy (1 pt withdrew for personal reasons before end of cycle 1 and 1 pt had immune-related toxicity during cycle 1 and was taken off study before any efficacy assessment). 9 pts (26%) had an esophageal primary, 18 pts (53%) had a GEJ primary and 7 pts (21%) had a gastric primary. Median PFS was 7.6 months [95% CI: 5.8 to 12.2], RR was 72.7% [95% CI: 57% to 88%], and median OS was 15.8 months [95% CI: 11.6 to NE]. 27 patients (81.8%) had decrease in disease burden (ranging from -19% to -100%). After > 18 months of follow-up, 5 patients remained in durable complete response (CR). Immune-mediated treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) included thyroid disorders (n=5; 14%), colitis (n=4; 11%), adrenal insufficiency (n=2; 5%), and type 1 diabetes (n=1). Sixteen patients (44%) experienced grade 3 or 4 TRAEs. There were no grade 5 TRAEs. Conclusions: The combination of C and O + P had acceptable safety and significant clinical activity. These promising results indicate that C and O + P merits further study as a first line option for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic GE adenocarcinoma. Updated survival and correlative data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03342937.

3606 Background: Pemigatinib (INCB054828) is a selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1–3 inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy in phase 1/2 (FIGHT-101) and phase 2 (FIGHT-201, -202, -203) trials in pts with advanced cancer. Here, we present preliminary safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic (PK) data for pemigatinib (PEMI) combined with pembrolizumab (PEMBRO), a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, in pts with refractory advanced malignancies enrolled in the ongoing FIGHT-101 trial (NCT02393248). Methods: FIGHT-101 includes monotherapy (part 1 and 2) and combination therapy (part 3) cohorts. This analysis is based on pts enrolled in the PEMI + PEMBRO combination dose finding (3a) and dose expansion (3b) cohorts. Eligible adults had advanced malignancies who had progressed after prior therapy and for whom PEMBRO treatment was relevant; pts in part 3b had FGF/FGFR alterations. Pts received oral PEMI at 9 mg or 13.5 mg QD on an intermittent dosing (ID) schedule (21-day cycle, 14-day on/7-day off), or 13.5 mg QD on a continuous dosing (CD) schedule, plus PEMBRO 200 mg IV on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Results: At data cutoff (August 30, 2019), 23 pts had received PEMI + PEMBRO; 22 (96%) had discontinued therapy (disease progression, 70%). Most frequent tumors were NSCLC (n = 3), bladder (n = 3), pancreatic, testicular, and sarcoma (each n = 2). Of 19 enrolled pts with baseline FGF/FGFR data; 5 had FGFR mutations or rearrangements. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred with PEMI + PEMBRO. The recommended PEMI dose combined with PEMBRO was 13.5 mg QD. Most frequent all-cause, all-grade (Gr) adverse events for ID (n = 17) were hyperphosphatemia (n = 14 [82%]; Gr ≥3, n = 0), anemia (n = 9 [53%]; Gr ≥3, n = 3 [18%]), and decreased appetite (n = 9 [53%]; Gr ≥3, n = 0); for CD (n = 6), hyperphosphatemia (n = 5 [83%]; Gr ≥3, n = 0), and dry mouth (n = 4 [67%]; Gr ≥3, n = 0). One pt discontinued, 2 reduced dose, and 13 interrupted dose due to AEs (none for hyperphosphatemia; dose interruption mainly for gastrointestinal AEs [n = 5]). One fatal AE occurred (suicide, not treatment-related). PK parameters for PEMI in the PEMI + PEMBRO combination were comparable with those for PEMI monotherapy. Five pts had partial response (3 had FGFR rearrangements or mutations); 5 pts had stable disease. Conclusions: PEMI + PEMBRO combination therapy was tolerable with no new safety signals, and demonstrated preliminary antitumor activity in pts with advanced malignancies including those with FGF/FGFR alterations. Clinical trial information: NCT02393248 .

BackgroundThe immunosuppressive desmoplastic stroma of pancreatic cancer represents a major hurdle to developing an effective immune response. Preclinical studies in pancreatic cancer have demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity with Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition combined with programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) blockade.MethodsThis was a phase II, multicenter, open-label, randomized (1:1) clinical trial evaluating the BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib, alone (monotherapy) or in combination with the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab (combination therapy). Eligible patients were adults with histologically confirmed metastatic or locally advanced unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≤1 who had received at least one prior systemic therapy. Oral acalabrutinib 100 mg twice daily was administered with or without intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg on day 1 of each 3-week cycle. Peripheral blood was analyzed for changes in immune markers, and tumors from exceptional responders were molecularly analyzed.ResultsA total of 77 patients were enrolled (37 monotherapy; 40 combination therapy) with a median age of 64 years; 77% had an ECOG PS of 1. The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1–6). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were seen in 14.3% of patients in the monotherapy arm and 15.8% of those in the combination therapy arm. The overall response rate and disease control rate were 0% and 14.3% with monotherapy and 7.9% and 21.1% with combination therapy, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 1.4 months in both arms. Peripheral blood flow analysis demonstrated consistent reductions in granulocytic (CD15+) myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) over time. Two exceptional responders were found to be microsatellite stable with low tumor mutation burden, low neoantigen load and no defects in the homologous DNA repair pathway.ConclusionsThe combination of acalabrutinib and pembrolizumab was well tolerated, but limited clinical activity was seen with either acalabrutinib monotherapy or combination therapy. Peripheral reductions in MDSCs were seen. Efforts to understand and target the pancreatic tumor microenvironment should continue.Trial registration numberNCT02362048.

Background: FGFR pathway activation is implicated in many solid tumors. Pemigatinib (INCB054828) is a selective FGFR1–3 inhibitor. We report updated data from FIGHT-101 (NCT02393248), a phase 1/2 study of pemigatinib alone, and combined with other agents, in patients with refractory advanced malignancies progressing after prior therapy, with no further effective standard therapy available. Methods: Eligible adults had advanced malignancies with/without FGF/FGFR alteration. Patients received oral pemigatinib QD on intermittent dosing (ID) 21-day (14-day-on/7-day-off) cycle or continuous dosing (CD) schedules. In part 1 (FGF/FGFR alteration not required), cohorts 1–3 (1–4 mg QD) evaluated single patients; escalation followed a 3+3 design (6–20 mg QD). In part 2 (dose expansion; documented FGF/FGFR alteration required), initial patients were dosed with pemigatinib 9 mg QD; additional patients were dosed at 13.5 mg and 20 mg QD. In part 3, pemigatinib was combined with standard therapies (dose-finding and expansion). Results: At data cutoff (February 19, 2019), 45, 71, and 44 patients were enrolled in parts 1–3, respectively. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed with monotherapy. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached, the pharmacologically active dose was 9 mg QD; the maximum safely administered dose was 20 mg. Recommended phase 2 dose was 13.5 mg QD, based on PK, pharmacodynamics, and safety. In parts 1 and 2 (n=116; median age, 58 y [range, 21–77]; men, 39%), 103 (89%) discontinued therapy (progressive disease [PD], 54%). In part 3 (n=44), 39 (89%) discontinued therapy (PD, 55%). Of 117 patients evaluated for FGF/FGFR status in parts 1–3, 100 (85%) had FGF/FGFR alterations. In parts 1 and 2, the most frequent all-cause, all-grade (Gr) adverse events (AEs) for ID were hyperphosphatemia (74%) and fatigue (40%) for 9 mg/13.5 mg doses (n=57); and hyperphosphatemia (67%) and stomatitis (50%) for the 20 mg dose (n=6); for CD, hyperphosphatemia (73%) and stomatitis (48%) for 9 mg/13.5 mg doses (n=33); and hyperphosphatemia (69%), dry mouth and diarrhea (each, 54%) for the 20 mg dose (n=13). The most frequent Gr ≥3 AEs across all dose levels in parts 1 and 2 for ID (n=70) were hyponatremia and pneumonia (each, 7%); for CD (n=46), fatigue (13%). In part 3, the most frequent all-cause, all-Gr AEs were anemia (73%) for pemigatinib + chemotherapy (gemcitabine + cisplatin/docetaxel; n=15); hyperphosphatemia and alopecia (each, 83%) for pemigatinib + trastuzumab (n=6); and hyperphosphatemia (74%) for pemigatinib + pembrolizumab (n=23). Most frequent Gr ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (40%) for pemigatinib + chemotherapy; diastolic hypertension, hypophosphatemia, lymphopenia, and portal vein thrombosis (each, 17%) for pemigatinib + trastuzumab; and anemia and diarrhea (each, 13%) for pemigatinib + pembrolizumab. In parts 1–3, hyperphosphatemia was managed with phosphate binders, diet and/or dose reduction (n=2) or delay (n=8). Conclusions: Pemigatinib was generally well tolerated as monotherapy and as combination therapy in patients with advanced malignancies and FGFR pathway activation. Updated data including efficacy data will be presented. Rapid development including a basket trial is planned. Citation Format: Vivek Subbiah, Minal Barve, Nicholas O. Iannotti, Martin Gutierrez, David C. Smith, Sameek Roychowdhury, Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos, Niharika Mettu, William J. Edenfield, Daniel Morgensztern, Luis Féliz, Christine Lihou, Huiling Zhen, Mansoor Saleh. FIGHT-101: A phase 1/2 study of pemigatinib, a highly selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, as monotherapy and as combination therapy in patients with advanced malignancies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A078. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-A078

Background The benefit of immune checkpoint blockade in mCRC is currently limited to mismatch repair (MMR) deficient tumours. Increasing evidence suggests that the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway plays a role in cancer immune evasion. Co-targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 and VEGF axes may result in clinical activity in mCRC. Methods 133 patients (pts) were randomized 2:1 to receive C/B/P (Arm A) or C/B/A (Arm B), stratifying by ECOG and RAS. Pts had progressed on 5-FU, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, bevacizumab, and anti-EGFR therapy (if RAS wt). Prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy was not permitted. Doses were C 850 or 1000 mg/m² d1-14, B 7.5 mg/kg d1, and A 1200 mg d1 in 21 day cycles. Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). 110 events were required to detect PFS hazard ratio (HR) of 0.65 at 1-sided α = 0.1 with 80% power. Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety/tolerability. Primary and secondary efficacy analyses were performed using modified intent to treat analysis (mITT). Results Analysis includes 46 pts (Arm A) and 82 pts (Arm B) with median age 58 yo, 40% female, 47% ECOG 0. As of 4/12/19, median follow-up was 12.35 months (mo). Proficient MMR or microsatellite stable (MSS) is present in 86.7% vs 85.7%. In mITT analysis, median PFS is 3.3 mo (2.1-6.2) vs 4.4 mo (4.1-6.4) with a HR of 0.725 (0.491-1.07), 1-sided log-rank p-value 0.051. In MSS only pts, HR for PFS is 0.67 (0.44-1.03). ORR is 4.35% (0.5-14.8) vs 8.54% (3.5-16.8), p = 0.5. The 12 mo OS is 43% (29-63) vs 52% (42-65), HR 0.94 (0.56-1.56), p = 0.4. Most common grade > = 3 related adverse events are hypertension (7% vs 9%), hand-foot syndrome (4% vs 6%), and diarrhea (2% vs 7%). Conclusions The study reached its prespecified primary endpoint and the addition of A to CB results in a significantly longer PFS. No new or increased safety signals are identified. Further investigation in a larger phase III study may be warranted. This is the first positive study co-targeting PD-1/PD-L1 and VEGF axes in mCRC and correlative analyses may help identify predictors of benefit. Clinical trial identification NCT0287319. Legal entity responsible for the study ACCRU. Funding Genentech Roche. Disclosure H.J. Lenz: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Genentech Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb. P.M. Boland: Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Research grant / Funding (institution): Hemispherx; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boston Biomedical; Research grant / Funding (institution): Isofol Medical; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Athenex; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Clinical Genomics. A.B. Nixon: Research grant / Funding (self): Seattle Genetics; Research grant / Funding (self): MedPacto; Research grant / Funding (self): Genentech Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Tracon Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self): Acceleron Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self): Leadiant Biosciences; Research grant / Funding (self): Sanofi-Aventis; Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lilly. H. Hurwitz: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Genentech Roche. M.G. Fakih: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (self): Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Array; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with a universally poor prognosis. In 2015, it is estimated that there will be 48,960 new cases of pancreatic cancer and that 40,560 people will die of the disease. The 5-year survival rate is 7.2% for all patients with pancreatic cancer; however, survival depends greatly on the stage at diagnosis. Unfortunately, 53% of patients already have metastatic disease at diagnosis, which corresponds to a 5-year survival rate of 2.4%. Even for the 9% of patients with localized disease confined to the pancreas, the 5-year survival is still modest at only 27.1%. These grim statistics highlight the need for ways to identify cohorts of individuals at highest risk, methods to screen those at highest risk to identify preinvasive pathologic precursors, and development of effective systemic therapies. Recent clinical and translational progress has emphasized the relationship with diabetes, the role of the stroma, and the interplay of each of these with inflammation in the pathobiology of pancreatic cancer. In this article, we will discuss these relationships and how they might translate into novel management strategies for the treatment of this disease.

Inhibitory pathway blockade has emerged as an important therapeutic modality in cancer. However, tumors escape immune surveillance by multiple mechanisms, which suggests a need to target combinations of distinct immunosuppressive pathways within the tumor microenvironment for optimal therapeutic benefit. JAK/STAT signaling functions downstream of several inflammatory cytokines, promoting a proinflammatory tumor microenvironment, increasing the number of immunosuppressive cells, and inhibiting dendritic cell activity. The PI3Kδ pathway reduces antitumor immunity by modulating effector and memory CD8+ T-cell differentiation. Preclinical studies of JAK and PI3Kδ inhibitors combined with anti-PD-1 demonstrate enhanced immune-mediated antitumor activity compared with single-agent JAK and PI3Kδ inhibitor treatment. We initiated a phase 1b, multicenter, open-label study using multiple biomarker technologies to evaluate the immune effects of inhibitors of either (1) JAK1 (itacitinib) or (2) PI3Kδ (INCB050465) combined with pembrolizumab anti-PD-1 therapy (pembro), in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. In part 1a of the study, pts received escalating doses of itacitinib (200-400 mg QD) or INCB050465 (0.3-30 mg QD) in combination with pembro 200 mg Q3W in a 3+3 design over a 21-d cycle. In part 1b (safety expansion) pts with select solid tumors previously treated with or naive to PD-1 therapy received combined therapy at the maximum tolerated and pharmacologically active doses identified in part 1a. Tumor biopsies at baseline and during weeks 3-5 were evaluated for CD3+, CD8+, and FoxP3+ T-cell infiltration by immunohistochemistry. Flow cytometry for peripheral T-cell activation and multiplexed plasma cytokine analysis were performed on samples collected on day 1 of cycles 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8. Part 1a enrolled 42 pts (itacitinib, n=8; INCB050465, n=34) and part 1b enrolled 89 pts (n=41 and n=48, respectively); 27 pts remain on study. Treatment with itacitinib 300 mg plus pembro did not significantly change intratumoral CD8+ T cell and Treg cell counts and reduced peripheral T-cell activation (p Citation Format: John M. Kirkwood, Nicholas Iannotti, Daniel Cho, Steven O'Day, Geoffrey Gibney, F. Stephen Hodi, Pamela Munster, Paul Hoyle, Sherry Owens, Michael Smith, Niharika Mettu. Effect of JAK/STAT or PI3Kδ plus PD-1 inhibition on the tumor microenvironment: Biomarker results from a phase Ib study in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT176.

TPS873 Background: Initial treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) involves a 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy regimen, often in combination with anti-VEGF therapy. Upon disease progression, multiple studies have suggested a benefit for continued anti-VEGF therapy. There is increasing evidence that VEGF plays a role in cancer immune evasion. Targeting of inflammatory and immune checkpoints are attractive approaches to enhance the benefits of anti-VEGF therapy. The safety and activity of the anti-PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab with bevacizumab and with 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab have been recently reported; the combinations were well-tolerated and suggested clinical activity. Therefore, bevacizumab may increase the immunogenicity of colorectal cancers, and the combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab may be associated with clinically meaningful response rates and disease control. Furthermore, there may be candidate biomarkers that may identify those patients most likely to benefit from this combination. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled phase II study, 135 patients with mCRC will be randomized 2:1 to receive capecitabine/bevacizumab/atezolizumab or capecitabine/bevacizumab/placebo. Patients with prior PD-L1/PD-1 therapy are ineligible. Primary and secondary efficacy will be conducted using ITT analysis. Safety analyses will include all randomized patients who receive at least one dose of study treatment. The primary objective is PFS. The secondary objectives are ORR, OS, safety, and tolerability. The primary comparison will be superiority of the active treatment for the PFS endpoint, atezolizumab versus placebo testing at 1-sided α = 0.1 (log rank test). A PFS hazard ratio of 0.618 (active treatment versus placebo) is detectable with 86% power (1 sided α = 0.1). No interim analyses for futility or efficacy will be conducted. A subset analysis will be performed in the microsatellite-high patients looking at potential differences in PFS and OS. Trial is active and currently recruiting patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02873195.

The decision about who may derive benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer is often a difficult one for clinicians. While multiple trials have demonstrated that adjuvant chemotherapy reduces the risk of recurrence and improves overall survival in patients with stage III disease, the data supporting the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II disease are not as compelling. Because adjuvant therapy can have significant toxicity, tools to help clinicians determine who may derive a benefit from therapy are of the utmost importance. Recent advances in high throughput technologies have led to the identification of molecular biomarkers-including microsatellite instability (MSI), loss of heterozygosity (LOH), p53, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF), thymidylate synthase (TS), and excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1)--as well as various multigene assays that are being studied for their ability to offer both prognostic and predictive information to clinicians. Here we review the current knowledge about molecular biomarkers that may aid the clinician in offering personalized cancer therapy based on the genetic landscape of an individual patient's tumor.

4130Background: The importance of the tumor microenvironment in the biology of mPC has been increasingly recognized. However, immune checkpoint blockade has previously shown limited clinical respon...

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARα, PPARδ, and PPARγ) constitute a family of nuclear receptors that regulates metabolic processes involved in lipid and glucose homeostasis. Although generally considered to function as ligand-regulated receptors, all three PPARs exhibit a high level of constitutive activity that may result from their stimulation by intracellularly produced endogenous ligands. Consequently, complete inhibition of PPAR signaling requires the development of inverse agonists. However, the currently available small molecule antagonists for the PPARs function only as partial agonists, or their efficacy is not sufficient to inhibit the constitutive activity of these receptors. Due to the lack of efficacious antagonists that interact with the ligand-binding domain of the PPARs, we decided to target an interaction that is central to nuclear receptor-mediated gene transcription: the nuclear receptor-coactivator interaction. We utilized phage display technology to identify short LXXLL-containing peptides that bind to the PPARs. Analysis of these peptides revealed a consensus binding motif consisting of HPLLXXLL. Cross-screening of these peptides for binding to other nuclear receptors enabled the identification of a high-affinity PPAR-selective peptide that has the ability to repress PPARγ1-dependent transcription of transfected reporter genes. Most importantly, when introduced into HepG2 cells, the peptide inhibited the expression of endogenous PPARγ1 target genes, adipose differentiation-related protein and mitochondrial 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A synthase 2. This work lends support for the rational development of peptidomimetics that block receptor-mediated transcription by targeting the nuclear receptor-coactivator interaction surface.

3611 Background: In colorectal cancer, many patients develop resistance to oxaliplatin, which is a challenge given the limited number of therapeutic options in the treatment of this disease. While ...