The alternatively spliced, short and long cholecystokinin receptors (CCK2S and CCK2L) were expressed in NIH3T3 cells, and compared using radioligand-binding assays with identical buffer and incubation conditions. As judged by a saturation analysis, the selective CCK2-receptor antagonist radioligand [3H]-JB93182 did not discriminate between the CCK2S or CCK2L receptors. A global analysis of competition studies, using a range of structurally diverse, CCK-receptor selective ligands, provided further evidence that these receptor subtypes were pharmacologically indistinguishable. However, when analysed individually a number of small, yet significant differences were observed with some of the compounds. These data are consistent with previous study that suggested a possible pharmacological difference between these isoforms, at least in terms of the CCK2-receptor antagonist, L-365,260. However, it would appear that the pharmacological profile of these compounds is not consistent with their affinity at the putative G1/G2 receptors previously described by Harper et al. Keywords: Cholecystokinin, CCK2 receptor, [3H]-JB93182, human, short and long isoforms, G1 and G2 receptors Introduction The cholecystokinin (CCK) receptor family is composed of two distinct gene products, the CCK1 and CCK2 receptors, and, as such, is one of the smallest G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) families known. Despite the lack of multiple distinct proteins, pharmacological heterogeneity of the CCK1 and CCK2 receptors has been proposed on numerous occasions (Sankaran et al., 1980; Durieux et al., 1986; Harper et al., 1996; Roberts et al., 1996; Bellier et al., 1997; Lena et al., 1999). In the majority of these cases, any functional significance of the heterogeneity has not been established although the possibility remains that multiple receptor subtypes are involved in the physiological modulation of CCK- and gastrin-regulated systems. Although no additional CCK2-receptor subtypes have been identified, splice variants of the CCK2 receptor have been reported (Song et al., 1993; Miyake, 1995; Hellmich et al., 2000). These CCK2-receptor variants include the amino-terminal truncated receptor subtype (Miyake, 1995), the alternatively spliced short and long CCK2 receptors (CCK2S and CCK2L; Song et al., 1993) and most recently the CCK-Bri4sv, which is a variant of the CCK2 receptor that retains a region of intron four in the coding sequence of the receptor (Hellmich et al., 2000). Radioligand-binding studies have revealed differences in the affinity of the full-length and truncated receptor subtypes for the endogenous ligands CCK-8S and gastrin (Miyake, 1995). The truncated receptor displayed ∼1 log concentration unit lower affinity for CCK-8S than the wild-type receptor and an increased selectivity for CCK and gastrin from ∼10-fold (wild-type) to ∼100-fold at the truncated receptor. Similarly, a comparison between the CCK-Bri4sv and the wild-type CCK2 receptor revealed that the variant protein displayed differences in the binding of the endogenous agonists gastrin-17 (G-17) and glycine-extended gastrin-17 (G-Gly; Hellmich et al., 2000). It was shown that the CCK-Bri4sv receptor displayed biphasic competition curves for G-17 and, furthermore, G-Gly was ∼3-fold more potent at the variant receptor subtype (Hellmich et al., 2000). It has not been established whether these differences in agonist-binding potencies for these receptor subtypes arise from actual alterations in the receptor structure or from the formation of different G-protein-regulated affinity states of the receptors. In contrast, the CCK2S and CCK2L receptors, which have been shown to coexist in human gastric tissue samples (Song et al., 1993) and have also been demonstrated in human tumour cell lines (Biagini et al., 1997), do not differentiate between the natural hormones CCK and gastrin (Ito et al., 1994), whereas, the nonpeptide antagonist L-365,260 displayed ∼3-fold greater affinity at the short receptor isoform (Wank et al., 1994). Interestingly, this antagonist has been previously shown to discriminate between the pharmacologically defined subtypes termed G1 and G2 (Harper et al., 1996; Roberts et al., 1996). Therefore, these splice variants appeared to be potential molecular counterparts of these G1 and G2 subtypes. The aim of this study was to pharmacologically characterise the CCK2S and the CCK2L receptor splice isoforms using a range of CCK-receptor ligands that have been previously shown to discriminate between the G1- and G2-receptor subtypes (Harper et al., 1999). Therefore, it should be possible, firstly, to determine if the coexpression of these molecularly distinct CCK2 receptors could account for previously reported receptor heterogeneity and, secondly, to establish which ligands (if any) could be used in the characterisation of the CCK2S and the CCK2L receptors in fresh human tissue, where these receptors have previously been shown to be coexpressed (Song et al., 1993; Biagini et al., 1997).