Search

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop a test with validity evidence for abdominal diagnostic ultrasound with a pass/fail-standard to facilitate mastery learning.METHOD: The simulator had 150 real-life patient abdominal scans of which 15 cases with 44 findings were selected, representing level 1 from The European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. Four groups of experience levels were constructed: Novices (medical students), trainees (first-year radiology residents), intermediates (third- to fourth-year radiology residents) and advanced (physicians with ultrasound fellowship). Participants were tested in a standardized setup and scored by two blinded reviewers prior to an item analysis.RESULTS: The item analysis excluded 14 diagnoses. Both internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.96) and inter-rater reliability (0.99) were good and there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) between all four groups, except the intermediate and advanced groups (p = 1.0). There was a statistically significant correlation between experience and test scores (Pearson's r = 0.82, p < 0.001). The pass/fail-standard failed all novices (no false positives) and passed all advanced (no false negatives). All intermediate participants and six out of 14 trainees passed.CONCLUSION: We developed a test for diagnostic abdominal ultrasound with solid validity evidence and a pass/fail-standard without any false-positive or false-negative scores.KEY POINTS: • Ultrasound training can benefit from competency-based education based on reliable tests. • This simulation-based test can differentiate between competency levels of ultrasound examiners. • This test is suitable for competency-based education, e.g. mastery learning. • We provide a pass/fail standard without false-negative or false-positive scores.

Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (US-FNAC) is used to evaluate the involvement of lymph nodes in various malignant diseases. Its value in detecting sentinel lymph node (SN) metastasis preoperatively in melanoma patients is controversial and is the subject of this study. In this prospective validation study, 91 consecutive patients with melanoma clinical stage I (n=64) and II (n=27) were examined with US-FNAC before SN biopsy from 2012 to 2014 at a tertiary center. All patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy before the US-FNAC. Lymph nodes that showed any of the Berlin morphologic criteria on ultrasonography were examined using FNAC. The median Breslow thickness of the melanomas was 1.22 mm (range: 0.47-11.5 mm). Twenty-two percent of the patients had metastases in their SNs, 90% of which were smaller than 2 mm in largest diameter. The percentages of metastases with a size more than 1 mm were 50 and 29%, respectively, in the true-positive and false-negative US groups. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for overall US examination were 30, 81, 24, and 83%, respectively. None of the FNACs contained conclusive malignant cells. The specificity of the FNAC was 76%. Our results show that US-FNAC was not a useful diagnostic tool in our setting as it did not add significantly to the staging and management of patients with mainly thin cutaneous melanomas, perhaps because of the often small size of the SN metastases. It may be useful in the early diagnosis of lymph node metastases in a subgroup of melanoma patients with larger metastases.

The radioactivity present in the patient (Act(rem) ) at sentinel node (SN) biopsy will depend on injected activity amount as well as on the time interval from tracer injection to biopsy, which both show great variations in the literature. The purpose of this study was to analyse the influence of varying Act(rem) levels on the outcome of axillary SN biopsy in patients with breast cancer (BC).

Udgivelsesdato: 2009-Mar