Search

Aims Subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased risk of progression to clinical AF, stroke, and cardiovascular death. We hypothesized that in pacemaker patients requiring dual-chamber rate-adaptive (DDDR) pacing, closed loop stimulation (CLS) integrated into the circulatory control system through intra-cardiac impedance monitoring would reduce the occurrence of atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) compared with conventional DDDR pacing. Methods and results Patients with sinus node dysfunctions (SNDs) and an implanted pacemaker or defibrillator were randomly allocated to dual-chamber CLS (n = 612) or accelerometer-based DDDR pacing (n = 598) and followed for 3 years. The primary endpoint was time to the composite endpoint of the first AHRE lasting ≥6 min, stroke, or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). All AHREs were independently adjudicated using intra-cardiac electrograms. The incidence of the primary endpoint was lower in the CLS arm (50.6%) than in the DDDR arm (55.7%), primarily due to the reduction in AHREs lasting between 6 h and 7 days. Unadjusted site-stratified hazard ratio (HR) for CLS vs. DDDR was 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72–0.99; P = 0.035]. After adjusting for CHA2DS2-VASc score, the HR remained 0.84 (95% CI, 0.71–0.99; P = 0.033). In subgroup analyses of AHRE incidence, the incremental benefit of CLS was greatest in patients without atrioventricular block (HR, 0.77; P = 0.008) and in patients without AF history (HR, 0.73; P = 0.009). The contribution of stroke/TIA to the primary endpoint (1.3%) was low and not statistically different between study arms. Conclusion Dual-chamber CLS in patients with SND is associated with a significantly lower AHRE incidence than conventional DDDR pacing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims The safety and efficacy of leadless intracardiac-permanent pacemaker (L-PM) have been demonstrated in multiple clinical trials, but data on comparisons with conventional transvenous-permanent pacemaker (T-PM) collected in a consecutive, prospective fashion are limited. The aim of this analysis was to compare the rate and the nature of device-related complications between patients undergoing L-PM vs. T-PM implantation. Methods and results Prospective, multicentre, observational project enrolling consecutive patients who underwent L-PM or T-PM implantation. The rate and nature of device-related complications were analysed and compared between the two groups. Individual 1:1 propensity matching of baseline characteristics was performed. A total of 2669 (n = 665 L-PM) patients were included and followed for a median of 39 months, L-PM patients were on average older and had more co-morbidities. The risk of device-related complications at 12 months was significantly lower in the L-PM group (0.5% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.009). Propensity matching yielded 442 matched pairs. In the matched cohort, L-PM patients trended toward having a lower risk of overall device-related complications (P = 0.129), had a similar risk of early complications (≤30 days) (P = 1.000), and had a significantly lower risk of late complications (>30 days) (P = 0.031). All complications observed in L-PM group were early. Most (75.0%) of complications observed in T-PM group were lead- or pocket-related. Conclusion In this analysis, the risk of device-related complications associated with L-PM implantation tended to be lower than that of T-PM. Specifically, the risk of early complications was similar in two types of PMs, while the risk of late complications was significantly lower for L-PM than T-PM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased risk of progression to clinical AF, stroke, and cardiovascular death. We hypothesized that in pacemaker patients requiring dual-chamber rate-adaptive (DDDR) pacing, closed loop stimulation (CLS) integrated into the circulatory control system through intra-cardiac impedance monitoring would reduce the occurrence of atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) compared with conventional DDDR pacing., Methods and Results: Patients with sinus node dysfunctions (SNDs) and an implanted pacemaker or defibrillator were randomly allocated to dual-chamber CLS (n = 612) or accelerometer-based DDDR pacing (n = 598) and followed for 3 years. The primary endpoint was time to the composite endpoint of the first AHRE lasting ≥6 min, stroke, or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). All AHREs were independently adjudicated using intra-cardiac electrograms. The incidence of the primary endpoint was lower in the CLS arm (50.6%) than in the DDDR arm (55.7%), primarily due to the reduction in AHREs lasting between 6 h and 7 days. Unadjusted site-stratified hazard ratio (HR) for CLS vs. DDDR was 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-0.99; P = 0.035]. After adjusting for CHA2DS2-VASc score, the HR remained 0.84 (95% CI, 0.71-0.99; P = 0.033). In subgroup analyses of AHRE incidence, the incremental benefit of CLS was greatest in patients without atrioventricular block (HR, 0.77; P = 0.008) and in patients without AF history (HR, 0.73; P = 0.009). The contribution of stroke/TIA to the primary endpoint (1.3%) was low and not statistically different between study arms., Conclusion: Dual-chamber CLS in patients with SND is associated with a significantly lower AHRE incidence than conventional DDDR pacing., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: G.L.B. received speaker’s fee from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and MicroPort. M.D.M., D.G., and A.G. are employees of Biotronik Italia S.p.A., an affiliate of Biotronik SE & Co. KG (study sponsor and manufacturer of investigational devices). All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: The safety and efficacy of leadless intracardiac-permanent pacemaker (L-PM) have been demonstrated in multiple clinical trials, but data on comparisons with conventional transvenous-permanent pacemaker (T-PM) collected in a consecutive, prospective fashion are limited. The aim of this analysis was to compare the rate and the nature of device-related complications between patients undergoing L-PM vs. T-PM implantation., Methods and Results: Prospective, multicentre, observational project enrolling consecutive patients who underwent L-PM or T-PM implantation. The rate and nature of device-related complications were analysed and compared between the two groups. Individual 1:1 propensity matching of baseline characteristics was performed. A total of 2669 (n = 665 L-PM) patients were included and followed for a median of 39 months, L-PM patients were on average older and had more co-morbidities. The risk of device-related complications at 12 months was significantly lower in the L-PM group (0.5% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.009). Propensity matching yielded 442 matched pairs. In the matched cohort, L-PM patients trended toward having a lower risk of overall device-related complications (P = 0.129), had a similar risk of early complications (≤30 days) (P = 1.000), and had a significantly lower risk of late complications (>30 days) (P = 0.031). All complications observed in L-PM group were early. Most (75.0%) of complications observed in T-PM group were lead- or pocket-related., Conclusion: In this analysis, the risk of device-related complications associated with L-PM implantation tended to be lower than that of T-PM. Specifically, the risk of early complications was similar in two types of PMs, while the risk of late complications was significantly lower for L-PM than T-PM., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: P.P. reports no conflicts with regard to the content of the present work, outside this work small speaker fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novartis; M.Z. reports no conflicts with regard to the content of the present work, outside this work small speaker fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Biotronik. No other conflicts of interest were reported., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Despite the significant improvement in the materials and the techniques used during carotid artery stenting (CAS) as well as the increased operator experience during the last years, complications still occur. Up to now, neither a classification nor a common definition of the possible complications still exist. It would be crucial as a common platform for prompt recognition, evaluation, treatment and study of the complications during CAS procedures and to reduce the clinical sequelae. The aim of this article is to review the most frequent periprocedural complications, to analyze their incidence and etiology, and to suggest possible ways of management and prevention.

Stroke is the third cause of death in western countries and its complications lead to significant socio-economic problems related to the prolonged hospitalization and rehabilitation of patients with neurological lesions. Severe atherosclerotic lesions of the carotid artery are the main cause of stroke and transient ischemic attacks. Their incidence may reach 5-7% per year in patients with carotid artery stenosis > 70% with or without symptoms. Time-honored carotid endarterectomy is still regarded as the gold standard therapy for primary and secondary prevention of stroke. However, surgery is not free of complications and the rate of perioperative stroke ranges from 5.1 to 14.3%. A group of patients at a particularly high risk of stroke during surgical endarterectomy is represented by patients with significant carotid stenosis in the presence of an occluded contralateral artery. Indeed, carotid cross-clamping during operative surgery in the absence of an adequate collateral flow may result in a critical flow reduction during the operation and therefore increases the risk of periprocedural strokes. In the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy (NASCET) trial, the overall risk of stroke was 5.1%, whereas it increased up to 14.3% in patients with an occluded contralateral carotid artery. Recently, carotid stenting has been increasingly used as an endovascular technique for carotid revascularization, especially after the introduction of neuroprotection devices which improved the safety of the procedure. Therefore, it may be an attractive alternative to carotid endarterectomy, especially when the surgical risk is too high. We describe the immediate and late outcomes of 3 patients treated with carotid artery stenting in the presence of contralateral carotid occlusion.

Vasoconstriction of collateral vessels has been previously reported as a mechanism of spontaneous transient ischemic episodes and after the administration of ergonovine. This case report describes a 47-year-old woman with mixed angina and a right coronary artery occlusion supplied by a collateral system related to the left anterior descending artery. Angina and ECG changes at rest were present for more than 1 year and also provoked by intracoronary ergonovine which induced collateral vasoconstriction. To the best of our knowledge, this report is the first demonstration that the reopening of the right coronary artery and the disappearance of collateral vessels may definitively relieve angina and ECG changes occurring at rest, thus confirming small coronary vessel constriction as the main cause of the disease status.

Coronary artery disease does not occur in all the patients with acute myocardial infarction. Coronary artery diseases occurs in 97% of cases; in the other 3% of cases, myocardial infarction is caused by coronary spasm (40%, intracoronary thrombosis (60%) due to platelet hyperreactivity, peripartum thrombophilia or use of oral contraceptives. Myocardial infarction in young women is an infrequent event. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is a rare cause of acute myocardial infarction that typically occurs during the peripartum period. A few cases of myocardial infarction in premenopausal women with no risk factors for coronary artery disease and normal coronary arteries have been reported. We describe 2 consecutive cases of acute myocardial infarction occurred in young, premenopausal women, without risk factors for cardiovascular diseases.

Background: The use of abciximab (c7E3 Fab; ReoPro , Eli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, Indiana) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) decreases the incidence of early (30-day) and late (6-month to 1 year) adverse cardiac ischemic events. In a high-risk population, abciximab also reduced the need for target lesion revascularization. PCI of lesions with complex morphology, particularly long lesions, is associated with more complicated outcomes. The use of multiple and/or long intracoronary stents to cover long coronary lesions may lower the incidence of acute or subacute occlusion, but is still limited by a high late restenosis rate. We characterized patients undergoing elective implantation of long or multiple overlapping coronary stents and determined the impact of abciximab administration on clinical and angiographic outcomes., Methods and Results: In a prospective, single-center randomized trial, a total of 107 patients undergoing elective implantation of long or multiple overlapping coronary stents were randomly assigned to receive either standard-dose heparin (n = 53) or abciximab plus low-dose heparin (n = 54). The use of abciximab was not associated with an increased incidence of bleeding or vascular complications compared to standard heparin regimen (3.7% versus 3.8%, respectively; p = NS). A 68% reduction in composite in-hospital cardiac events (i.e., death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization) was observed in the abciximab group (3.7% versus 11.5%, p = 0.1). At 6-month follow-up, a 48% reduction of target lesion revascularization (11% versus 21%; p = 0.1) and a decrease in binary angiographic restenosis were observed for abciximab-treated patients (17% versus 34%; p < 0.05)., Conclusion: The peri-procedural use of abciximab during implantation of long or multiple overlapping coronary stents is safe and effective, as it does not increase bleeding or vascular complications compared to standard heparin anticoagulation and reduces the incidence of in-hospital adverse cardiac events; moreover, abciximab improves 6-month clinical and angiographic outcomes in such a complex setting.