Search

Martina Morokutti-Kurz, 1 Nicole Unger-Manhart, 1 Philipp Graf, 1 Pia Rauch, 2 Julia Kodnar, 1 Maximilian Große, 2 Christian Setz, 2 Markus Savli, 3 Friedrich Ehrenreich, 4 Andreas Grassauer, 1 Eva Prieschl-Grassauer, 1 Ulrich Schubert 2 1Marinomed Biotech AG, Korneuburg, 2100, Austria; 2Institute of Virology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; 3Biostatistik & Consulting Savli, Hartberg, 8230, Austria; 4Practice Dr. Friedrich Ehrenreich, Vienna, 1170, AustriaCorrespondence: Martina Morokutti-KurzMarinomed Biotech AG, Korneuburg, 2100, AustriaEmail martina.morokutti-kurz@marinomed.comUlrich SchubertInstitute of Virology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, GermanyEmail ulrich.schubert@fau.dePurpose: The aim of this study was to investigate whether sucking of an iota-carrageenan containing lozenge releases sufficient iota-carrageenan into the saliva of healthy subjects to neutralize representatives of the most common respiratory virus families causing common cold and SARS-CoV-2.Patients and Methods: In this monocentric, open label, prospective clinical trial, 31 healthy subjects were included to suck a commercially available iota-carrageenan containing lozenge. Saliva samples from 27 subjects were used for ex vivo efficacy analysis. The study’s primary objective was to assess if the mean iota-carrageenan concentration of the saliva samples exceeded 5 μg/mL, which is the concentration known to reduce replication of human rhinovirus (hRV) 1a and 8 by 90%. The iota-carrageenan concentration of the saliva samples was analyzed by UV-Vis spectroscopy. The antiviral effectiveness of the individual saliva samples was determined in vitro against a panel of respiratory viruses including hRV1a, hRV8, human coronavirus OC43, influenza virus A H1N1pdm09, coxsackievirus A10, parainfluenza virus 3 and SARS-CoV-2 using standard virological assays.Results: The mean iota-carrageenan concentration detected in the saliva exceeds the concentration needed to inhibit 90% of hRV1a and hRV8 replication by 134-fold (95% CI 116.3– 160.8-fold; p < 0.001). Thus, the study met the primary endpoint. Furthermore, the iota-carrageenan saliva concentration was 60 to 30,351-fold higher than needed to reduce viral replication/binding of all tested viruses by at least 90% (p < 0.001). The effect was most pronounced in hCoV OC43; in case of SARS-CoV-2, the IC 90 was exceeded by 121-fold (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Sucking an iota-carrageenan containing lozenge releases sufficient iota-carrageenan to neutralize and inactivate the most abundant respiratory viruses as well as pandemic SARS-CoV-2. The lozenges are therefore an appropriate measure to reduce the viral load at the site of infection, hereby presumably limiting transmission within a population as well as translocation to the lower respiratory tract.Trial Registration: NCT04533906.Keywords: iota-carrageenan, respiratory viruses, corona virus, lozenges, antiviral, clinical study, SARS-CoV-2

Corticosteroids and macrolide immunomodulators such as tacrolimus are effective drugs for the topical treatment of inflammatory eye diseases like allergic conjunctivitis or dry eye. However, tacrolimus is practically insoluble in aqueous solutions and is therefore currently formulated as dispersion. This leads to low bioavailability. Here, we present a novel pharmacologically acceptable, aqueous formulation of tacrolimus based on the "Marinosolv formulation platform". Marinosolv allows the solubilization and thereby improvement of the bioavailability of many otherwise practically insoluble drugs, since dissolved drugs permeate faster into tissues, including ocular tissues. To visualize the benefits of Marinosolv in ophthalmic formulations, we investigated the permeation of a fluorescently labeled estradiol dissolved in Marinosolv compared to a formulation containing the compound as dispersion. Permeation was studied ex-vivo and in-vivo in porcine eyes. Further, we evaluated the improved permeation of topically applied tacrolimus dissolved in Marinosolv compared to a commercially available topically applied tacrolimus dispersion. The Marinosolv formulation was also compared to oral tacrolimus treatment, the standard application route for this drug in case of severe posterior uveitis. Finally, the ocular tissue levels of tacrolimus in all groups were determined using HPLC/MS. We demonstrated that tacrolimus dissolved in Marinosolv reached significantly higher levels in ocular tissues compared to the marketed topical product or after oral application and thus may be a suitable novel option for the treatment of several eye diseases, such as allergic conjunctivitis or uveitis. Thus, Marinosolv may be considered as a new vehicle for tacrolimus eye drops.

Background Budesonide, a poorly water‐soluble corticosteroid, is currently marketed as a suspension. Budesolv is a novel aqueous formulation containing dissolved budesonide showing increased local availability in preclinical models. Budesolv contains ~85% less corticosteroid than the marketed comparator. Objective The study (EudraCT:2018‐001324‐19) was designed to assess non‐inferiority of Budesolv compared to Rhinocort® Aqua 64 (RA) and early onset of action. Methods In a three‐way cross‐over double‐blinded randomized trial, Budesolv 10 was compared to RA and placebo in grass pollen allergic rhinoconjunctivitis volunteers (n = 83 (ITT); n = 75 (PP)). On day 1, participants entered the Vienna Challenge Chamber (VCC) for 6 hours; first treatment took place at 1:45 hours after entry. Participants treated themselves for further 6 days; on day 8, the last treatment was applied before entering the VCC. Subjective symptom scores, nasal airflow and nasal secretion were measured regularly during allergen challenge. Results Budesolv 10 was equally effective compared to RA with respect to TNSS and nasal airflow after eight days of treatment with a strongly reduced dose (more than 80% reduction). After first dose, only Budesolv 10 showed a significant reduction of nasal and respiratory symptoms starting 90 minutes (P

Due to fast nasal mucociliary clearance, only the dissolved drug content can effectively permeate the mucosa and be pharmaceutically active after intranasal application of suspensions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to increase the budesonide concentration in solution of a nasal spray formulation. Budesonide, a highly water-insoluble corticosteroid, was successfully solubilized using a micellar formulation comprising escin, propylene glycol and dexpanthenol in an aqueous buffered environment (&ldquo, Budesolv&rdquo, ). A formulation based on this micellar system was well-tolerated in the nasal cavity as shown in a good laboratory practice (GLP) local tolerance study in rabbits. Ex vivo permeation studies into porcine nasal mucosa revealed a faster and more efficient absorption. Budesolv with 300 &micro, g/mL solubilized budesonide resulted in a budesonide concentration of 42 &micro, g/g tissue after only 15 min incubation. In comparison, incubation with the marketed product Rhinocort&reg, aqua 64 (1.28 mg/mL budesonide as suspension) led to 15 &micro, g/g tissue. The in vivo tumor-necrosis-factor (TNF)-&alpha, secretion in an acute lung inflammation mouse model was significantly reduced (p &lt, 0.001) following a prophylactic treatment with Budesolv compared to Rhinocort&reg, aqua 64. Successful treatment 15 min after the challenge was only possible with Budesolv (40% reduction of TNF-&alpha, p = 0.0012) suggesting a faster onset of action. The data reveal that solubilization based on saponin micelles presents an opportunity for the development of products containing hardly soluble substances that result in a faster onset and a better topical treatment effect.

Objective Purpose of this DBPC study was to evaluate onset of action and non-inferiority of a novel low dose aqueous solution of Budesonide (“Budesolv 10μg”) to Rhinocort® aqua 64μg (RA) in adult grass pollen allergic patients. Methods Budesonide, a poorly water-soluble corticosteroid, currently marketed as suspension, was reformulated to enhance solubility and local concentration on the target mucosa. Subjects received Budesolv, the market comparator RA and placebo once daily for 8 days. Allergic symptoms were induced by 6h grass pollen challenges in the Vienna Challenge Chamber at days 1 and 8 of each treatment period. First dose was applied after 1:45h to evaluate onset of action of either treatment. Nasal, ocular, asthma symptoms and objective measures of nasal secretion and nasal obstruction were evaluated. A 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for difference in means between active treatments. Non-inferiority was stated if the upper limit of the CI did not exceed 115% of the reference. Onset of action was defined as first time point when the difference in nasal symptoms change from baseline between active treatment and placebo was p Results 75 patients concluded the study per protocol. The primary endpoint (TNSS; sum of obstruction, itch, sneeze and rhinorrhoea) was met proving non-inferiority of Budesolv compared to RA. A significant difference between Budesolv and placebo was shown for TNSS 2.45 h and for total asthma score 2 h after first dose. On day 8 Budesolv 10μg was significantly better than placebo for all parameters evaluated. Conclusion Non-inferiority of Budesolv compared to Rhinocort® was shown on day 8 of treatment. Early onset of action within 3h after first dose was evident for Budesolv only.