Search

Frailty assessment and prehabilitation can be incrementally implemented in a multidisciplinary, multiphase pathway to improve patient care. To start, modifications can be made to a surgeon's practice with existing resources while adapting standard pathways for frail patients. Frailty screening can identify patients in need of additional assessment and optimization. Personalized utilization of frailty data for optimization through prehabilitation can improve postoperative outcomes and identify patients who would benefit from adapted care. Additional utilization of the multidisciplinary team can lead to improved outcomes and a strong business case to add additional members of the team.

The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer’s (CoC) new operative standards for breast cancer, melanoma, and colon cancer surgeries will require that surgeons provide synoptic documentation of essential oncologic elements within operative reports. Prior to designing and implementing an electronic tool to support synoptic reporting, we evaluated current documentation practices at our institution to understand baseline concordance with these standards. Applicable procedures performed between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018 were included. Two independent reviewers evaluated sequential operative notes, up to a total of 100 notes, for documentation of required elements. Complete concordance (CC) was defined as explicit documentation of all required CoC elements. Mean percentage CC and surgeon-specific CC were calculated for each procedure. Interrater reliability was assessed via Cohen’s kappa statistic. For sentinel lymph node biopsy, mean CC was 66% (n = 100), with surgeon-specific CC ranging from 6 to 100%, and for axillary dissection, mean CC was 12% (n = 89) and surgeon-specific CC ranged from 0 to 47%. The single surgeon performing melanoma wide local excision had a mean CC of 98% (n = 100). For colon resections, mean CC was 69% (n = 96) and surgeon-specific CC ranged from 39 to 94%. Kappa scores were 0.77, 0.78, −0.15, and 0.78, respectively. We identified heterogeneity in current documentation practices. In our cohort, rates of baseline concordance varied across surgeons and procedures. Currently, documentation elements are interspersed within the operative report, posing challenges to chart abstraction with resulting imperfect interrater reliability. This presents an exciting opportunity to innovate and improve compliance by introducing an electronic synoptic documentation tool.

Background Insurance status has been strongly associated with both access to and outcomes of colon resection (CRS). Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), individual states opted to participate in Medicaid expansion (ME) and adopt essential health benefits (EHB). Methods We performed a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences (DID) analysis of 2012–2017 state-level inpatient claims with risk adjustment. We examined frequency of emergent presentation and in-hospital death. Subset analyses were performed by insurance type. Results Among the 73,961 CRS patients, 49.6% were in a state with both ME and EHB, 34.7% presented emergently, and 2.0% died. Adoption of ME and EHB was associated with a significant, 24%, reduction in the likelihood of in-hospital mortality, and no significant change in emergent presentation for CRS. Conclusions The ACA’s ME was strongly associated with a decrease in mortality following colon resection among Medicaid beneficiaries. These findings support the adoption of healthcare policies that improve access to insurance.

It is unclear how the Affordable Care Act's state-based Medicaid Expansion (ME) has impacted surgeon selection for colorectal resections (CRS).We performed a risk-adjusted DID analysis on state discharge data of CRS patients aged 26-64 from NY (Expansion) and FL (non-Expansion) before (2012-2013) and after (2016-2017) ME. Primary outcome was use of a high-volume or colorectal-boarded surgeon. Subset analysis performed on insurance status.Among 78,866 CRS patients, ME was associated with a 5.9% increase in Medicaid enrollment. ME was associated with a 0.73 (95%CI: 0.67-0.69; p 0.001) reduced odds of high-volume surgeon usage by commercially insured patients when compared to usage by commercially insured patients in the non-expansion state. No statistically significant difference was noted in the use of a colorectal-boarded surgeon following reform.ME was associated with an increase in Medicaid enrollment and a decrease in the use of high-volume surgeons by the commercially insured.

Medicaid expansion has improved healthcare coverage and preventive health service use. To what extent this has resulted in earlier stage colorectal cancer diagnoses and impacted perioperative outcomes is unclear.This was a retrospective difference-in-difference study using the National Cancer Database on adults (40-64) with Medicaid or no insurance, diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinomas before (2010-2013) and after (2015-2018) expansion. The primary outcome was early-stage (American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage 0-1) diagnosis. The secondary outcomes were rate of local excision, emergency surgery, postoperative length of stay, rates of minimally invasive surgery, postoperative mortality, and overall survival (OS).Medicaid expansion was associated with an increase in early-stage diagnoses for patients with colorectal cancers (odds ratio [OR]: 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-1.43), an increase in local excision (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.13-1.69), and a decreased rate of emergent surgery (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.97) and 90-day mortality (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.59-0.97). Additionally, patients in expansion states postexpansion had an improved 5-year OS (hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.94).Insurance coverage expansion may be particularly important for optimizing stage of diagnosis, subsequent survival, and perioperative outcomes for socioeconomically vulnerable patients.

Background Little is known about the impact of Medicaid expansion on the surgical care of inflammatory bowel disease. We sought to determine whether Medicaid expansion is associated with improved postsurgical outcomes for patients with inflammatory bowel disease undergoing a colorectal resection. Methods We performed a risk-adjusted difference-in-difference study examining postsurgical outcomes for patients ages 26 to 64 with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis undergoing a colorectal resection across 15 states that did and did not expand Medicaid before (2012-2013) and after (2016-2018) policy reform. Primary study outcomes included 30-day readmission and postoperative complication. Results Study population included 11 394 patients with inflammatory bowel disease that underwent a colorectal resection. States that underwent Medicaid expansion were associated with a rise in Medicaid enrollment following policy reform (11.8% pre-Medicaid expansion vs 19.7% post-Medicaid expansion). Difference-in-difference analysis revealed a statistically significant lower odds of 30-day readmission in patients undergoing a colorectal resection in expansion states following policy reform relative to patients in nonexpansion states prior to reform (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.86). No changes in odds of postoperative complication were noted across expansion and nonexpansion states. Conclusions Medicaid expansion is associated with a rise in Medicaid enrollment in expansion states following policy reform. There were greater improvements in postoperative outcomes associated with patients in expansion states following policy reform relative to patients in nonexpansion states prior to reform, which may have been related to improved perioperative care and medical management.

Few studies have confirmed a benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy (aCTX) in stage II colon cancer. We used the National Cancer Database to explore the use and efficacy of aCTX in patients with both normal-risk (NR) and high-risk (HR) young stage II colon cancer.We identified patients with stage II colon cancer who underwent colectomy between 2010 and 2015. HR patients included at least: lymphovascular or perineural invasion, 12 lymph nodes, poor/un-differentiation, T4, or positive margins. Rates of aCTX by age and risk were calculated, and adjusted factors associated with aCTX were identified. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox multivariable analyses for patients 50 years.Among the 81,066 stage II patients who underwent colectomy, 6093 (7.5%) were 50 years old. Of these, 2669 patients were HR. Thirty percent of NR and almost 60% of HR patients 50 years received aCTX, compared with 8% and 23% of patients50 years (P .001). In NR patients 50 years, 35.3% with microsatellite-stable tumors and 18% with microsatellite unstable tumors received aCTX (P .001), whereas 63.6% and 43.2%, respectively, of HR patients did (P .001). The most significant multivariable predictors of aCTX were risk status and age. On univariate analysis, there was no survival benefit associated with aCTX in patients 50 years. Multivariate analysis failed to demonstrate a survival benefit for aCTX for either group (HR, 0.97; P = .84; NR, 0.1.03; P = .90).Young patients with HR and NR colon cancer received aCXT more frequently than older patients with no demonstrable survival benefit. This bears further evaluation to avoid the real risks of over-treatment in this increasing population.

Simultaneous proctectomy and hepatic resection for stage IV rectal cancer remains controversial due to concerns for increased morbidity and mortality. While small series have described simultaneous rectal and hepatic resection, surgical outcomes in a large national cohort have not been described.Overall, 9012 patients with stage IV rectal adenocarcinoma with hepatic metastases were identified in the National Cancer Data Base (2010-2015). Associations between treatment selection, tumor and patient characteristics, 30- and 90-day mortality, and factors predictive of survival after surgery were examined. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between tumor/patient characteristics, and selection of combined proctectomy and hepatectomy (C-PH). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to identify median survival stratified by age and other patient-specific factors.Among patients included for analysis, 1331 (14.8%) underwent C-PH. Factors associated with lower rates of C-PH included increasing age, Black/Hispanic race, increased Charlson comorbidity score, Medicare/Medicaid/uninsured status, and treatment at a community cancer program. Thirty- and 90-day mortality increased with age (Chi square 11.4, p 0.005; and Chi square 23.9, p 0.001, respectively). On multivariate analysis, poorer survival after C-PH was associated with age 70 years (hazard ratio [HR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-2.5, p 0.001), perineural invasion (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9, p 0.001), kras mutation (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1, p = 0.006), positive circumferential margin (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.7, p = 0.03), and omission of postoperative chemotherapy (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.7, p = 0.002).C-PH should be utilized with caution in frail, high-risk patients. Such patients may be better served by staged surgical management or nonsurgical therapy.

Anastomotic leak is associated with increased morbidity and mortality after colorectal surgery. Although surgical techniques have improved over time, anastomotic leak is still a reality in colorectal surgery with rates ranging from as low as 1% for low-risk anastomoses, such as enteroenteric or ileocolic, to 19% for high-risk coloanal anastomoses. There are many varied risk factors for anastomotic leak. However, many of the risk factors have not been definitively proven in high-quality studies. Presumably, risk factors are cumulative and every effort should be made to optimize modifiable risk factors in the perioperative period. Treatment of anastomotic leak should start with the determination of patient stability followed by resuscitation and diagnostic imaging or operative exploration. Operative findings will dictate surgical approach with the goal of controlling sepsis and stabilizing the patient. If nonoperative treatment is undertaken, close patient monitoring is necessary to ensure control of sepsis and that intervention is undertaken if the clinical picture changes. Early intervention at each stage is key to decreasing the morbidity of anastomotic leak.

Evidence suggests that elective primary colon resection (ePCR) in patients with asymptomatic colon tumors and unresectable metastases is not required and may expose patients to unnecessary operative risk.Stage IV colon cancer patients with liver metastases from 2000 to 2011 were identified with SEER-Medicare data. Liver-based therapy or urgent/emergent colectomies were excluded. Chemotherapy alone was compared to ePCR ± chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictors of ePCR. Multivariate Cox regression compared survival.5139 patients were identified. The ePCR rate decreased over time; 84% underwent ePCR in 2000, compared to 52% in 2011 (p 0.001). In multivariate analysis, older patients were more likely to undergo ePCR, as were patients from rural areas (OR 1.65, p 0.001). The odds of PCR in high poverty areas (10%) were almost 25% higher than those in low poverty areas (OR 1.23, p = 0.03). African-Americana were less likely to undergo PCR than Caucasians (OR 0.76, p = 0.01). In multivariate survival analysis, PCR was associated with a significant survival benefit (HR 0.59, p 0.001).Although ePCR is not recommended with unresectable metastases and the rate has decreased significantly, over 50% of patients with untreated hepatic metastases underwent ePCR in 2011. Disparities exist in use of ePCR that are likely multifactorial and deserve further study.

Background Senior adults fear postoperative loss of independence the most, and this might represent an additional burden for families and society. The number of geriatric patients admitted to the emergency room requiring an urgent surgical treatment is rising, and the presence of frailty is the main risk factor for postoperative morbidity and functional decline. Frailty assessment in the busy emergency setting is challenging. The aim of this study is to verify the effectiveness of a very simple five-item frailty screening tool, the Flemish version of the Triage Risk Screening Tool (fTRST), in predicting functional loss after emergency surgery among senior adults who were found to be independent before surgery. Methods All consecutive individuals aged 70 years and older who were independent (activity of daily living (ADL) score ≥5) and were admitted to the emergency surgery unit with an urgent need for abdominal surgery between December 2015 and May 2016 were prospectively included in the study. On admission, individuals were screened using the fTRST and additional metrics such as the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CACI) and the ASA score. Thirty- and 90-day complications and postoperative decline in the ADL score where recorded. Regression analysis was performed to identify preoperative predictors of functional loss. Results Seventy-eight patients entered the study. Thirty-day mortality rate was 12.8% (10/78), and the 90-day overall mortality was 15.4% (12/78). One in every four patients (17/68) experienced a significant functional loss at 30-day follow-up. At 90-day follow-up, only 3/17 patients recovered, 2 patients died, and 12 remained permanently dependent. On the regression analysis, a statistically significant correlation with functional loss was found for fTRST, CACI, and age≥85 years old both at 30 and 90 days after surgery. fTRST≥2 showed the highest effectiveness in predicting functional loss at 90 days with AUC 72 and OR 6.93 (95% CI 1.71–28.05). The institutionalization rate with the need to discharge patients to a healthcare facility was 7.6% (5/66); all of them had a fTRST≥2. Conclusion fTRST is an easy and effective tool to predict the risk of a postoperative functional decline and nursing home admission in the emergency setting.

The goal of this manuscript is to present new and thought-provoking information related to the surgical care of older patients. We focused on four main areas including communication, surgical pathways, the care of emergency surgery patients, and functional recovery and quality of life. We sought to answer how these areas have evolved, affecting the care of older patients. Older patients with cancer present particular challenges in relation to communication, goals, surgical treatment, and post-surgical outcomes. Communication should be clear early and during the treatment course. A multidisciplinary, multimodality, multi-phase pathway can be utilized to improve the postoperative outcomes of older patients with cancer. Functional recovery and quality of life can and should be measured in this population. Communication is complicated in cancer patients, which is made more complex with advancing age. Communication is the cornerstone of the treatment of older patients. Future research should focus on interventions to improve communication and measure quality of life and functional recovery metrics.

The goal of this manuscript is to present new and thought-provoking information related to the surgical care of older patients. We focused on four main areas including communication, surgical pathways, the care of emergency surgery patients, and functional recovery and quality of life. We sought to answer how these areas have evolved, affecting the care of older patients.Older patients with cancer present particular challenges in relation to communication, goals, surgical treatment, and post-surgical outcomes. Communication should be clear early and during the treatment course. A multidisciplinary, multimodality, multi-phase pathway can be utilized to improve the postoperative outcomes of older patients with cancer. Functional recovery and quality of life can and should be measured in this population. Communication is complicated in cancer patients, which is made more complex with advancing age. Communication is the cornerstone of the treatment of older patients. Future research should focus on interventions to improve communication and measure quality of life and functional recovery metrics.

Objectives To determine whether the Flemish version of the Triage Risk Screening Tool (fTRST) can be used to accurately assess frailty in an emergency setting. Design Prospective observational study. Setting of a tertiary referral hospital. Patients All individuals aged 70 and older consecutively admitted to the emergency surgery unit with an urgent need for abdominal surgery between December 2015 and May 2016 who met inclusion criteria (N=110). Measurements Individuals were screened with the fTRST and additional metrics such as the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index and American Society of Anesthesiology score. Thirty- and 90-day postoperative complications where recorded. Regression analyses were performed to identify possible preoperative predictors of adverse outcomes. Results Thirty-day major complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification 3-5) occurred in 28.2% of participants (n=31). fTRST had the highest correlation with major complications (odds ratio (OR) = 7.42). All participants who died within 30 days of surgery has a fTRST score of 2 or greater (area under the receiver operating curve (AUC)=71.3). When risk factors for overall 90-day mortality were analyzed, a fTRST score of 2 or greater had sensitivity of 96% (95% confidence interval CI=79.6-99.9%), specificity of 43.5% (95% CI=32.8-54.7%) (AUC=69.8%; OR=18.50, 95% CI=2.39-143.11, p = .005). The average length of hospital stay was more than twice as long in the group with a fTRST score of 2 or greater (15.2 days) than in those with a score less than 2 (6.6 days) (p = .005). Conclusion The fTRST is an effective tool to predict mortality, morbidity, and length of stay after emergency surgery and can therefore be used to anticipate postoperative course, determine care goals, and plan for involvement of a dedicated geriatric care team. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:309-316, 2019.

With an expanding elderly population and median rectal cancer detection age of 70 years, the prevalence of rectal cancer in elderly patients is increasing. Management is based on evidence from younger patients, resulting in substandard treatments and poor outcomes. Modern management of rectal cancer in the elderly demands patient-centered treatment, assessing frailty rather than chronological age. The heterogeneity of this group, combined with the limited available data, impedes drafting evidence based guidelines. Therefore, a multidisciplinary task force convened experts from the European Society of Surgical Oncology, European Society of Coloproctology, International Society of Geriatric Oncology and the American College Surgeons Commission on Cancer, with the goal of identifying the best practice to promote personalized rectal cancer care in older patients. A crucial element for personalized care was recognized as the routine screening for frailty and geriatrician involvement and personalized care for frail patients. Careful patient selection and improved surgical and perioperative techniques are responsible for a substantial improvement in rectal cancer outcomes. Therefore, properly selected patients should be considered for surgical resection. Local excision can be utilized when balancing oncologic outcomes, frailty and life expectancy. Watch and wait protocols, in expert hands, are valuable for selected patients and adjuncts can be added to improve complete response rates. Functional recovery and patient-reported outcomes are as important as oncologic-specific outcomes in this age group. The above recommendations and others were made based on the best-available evidence to guide the personalized treatment of elderly patients with rectal cancer. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Colonoscopy is a common procedure performed for screening, diagnostic, or therapeutic indications; nevertheless, it is an invasive procedure that has associated risks. Complications of colonoscopy can be divided into four main categories: (1) bleeding, (2) postpolypectomy syndrome, (3) perforation, and (4) rarely, solid organ injury. In this review, we discuss strategies to avoid and treat complications of colonoscopy. Diligent biopsy and use of electrocautery and avoiding looping and blind advancement of the colonoscope minimize the risk of these complications. Management of complications ranges from non-operative conservative management, to minimally invasive endoscopic or laparoscopic techniques, to operative exploration.

Internal rectal intussusception, rectal prolapse, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) are members of a continuum of benign anatomic abnormalities of the pelvic floor associated with abnormal descent of the rectal wall that can be functionally debilitating. Internal intussusception can be associated with a variety of symptoms ranging from mucous drainage to tenesmus to fecal incontinence. Internal intussusception and other forms of pelvic floor dysfunction have been implicated in the pathophysiology of SRUS, a benign lesion of variable appearance on the rectal mucosa whose symptoms are analogous to those described for internal intussusception. Evaluation of pelvic floor dysfunction using defecography often reveals internal intussusception, but healthy volunteers will have similar incidence of intussusception. Therefore, management must be directed toward symptomatic relief, not correction of presumptive anatomic abnormalities. As many patients will suffer dysfunction with more than one pelvic floor compartment, a multi-disciplinary team is often required. There are many surgical approaches described with varying degrees of success, but no operative intervention should be pursued until non-operative measures have been exhausted.

Objective: Older patients with cancer value functional outcomes as much as survival, but surgical studies lack functional recovery (FR) data. The value of a standardized frailty assessment has been confirmed, yet it's infrequently utilized due to time restrictions into everyday practice. The multicenter GOSAFE study was designed to (1) evaluate the trajectory of patients' quality of life (QoL) after cancer surgery (2) assess baseline frailty indicators in unselected patients (3) clarify the most relevant tools in predicting FR and clinical outcomes. This is a report of the study design and baseline patient evaluations. Materials & Methods: GOSAFE prospectively collected a baseline multidimensional evaluation before major elective surgery in patients (≥70 years) from 26 international units. Short−/mid−/long-term surgical outcomes were recorded with QoL and FR data. Results: 1003 patients were enrolled in a 26-month span. Complete baseline data were available for 977(97.4%). Median age was 78 years (range 70–94); 52.8% males. 968(99%) lived at home, 51.6% without caregiver. 54.4% had ≥ 3 medications, 5.9% none. Patients were dependent (ADL < 5) in 7.9% of the cases. Frailty was either detected by G8 ≤ 14(68.4%), fTRST ≥ 2(37.4%), TUG > 20 s (5.2%) or ASAIII-IV (48.8%). Major comorbidities (CACI > 6) were detected in 36%; 20.9% of patients had cognitive impairment according to Mini-Cog. Conclusion: The GOSAFE showed that frailty is frequent in older patients undergoing cancer surgery. QoL and FR, for the first time, are going to be primary outcomes of a real-life observational study. The crucial role of frailty assessment is going to be addressed in the ability to predict postoperative outcomes and to correlate with QoL and FR.

Cancer care in elderly patients is complex. A recent survey showed that among mostly academic surgeons, practice patterns varied in the care of elderly patients. The authors suggested three areas of intervention in improving care of this population: frailty assessment, nutritional assessment, and assessment of quality of life.

Most graduating surgical residents and fellows have minimal exposure to office hours or clinic during training. Before the first day at your new job, meeting with your new office staff and partners is strongly recommended. Open communication with your staff in terms of office flow, scheduling, and expectations up front will help significantly. Overviewing any procedures and supplies necessary in advance will also be helpful for your clinic days.

Colon and rectal surgery fellowship has become one of the most popular surgical fellowships in recent years with the match rate reaching 100%. The field of colon and rectal surgery involves a technical expertise, diversity of skills, evolving technology, and multidisciplinary care. Maximizing your surgical talents while utilizing your professional relationships thus far will lead to a successful colon and rectal surgery fellowship placement.

Background: Stress hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in the critically ill. Intermittent, random blood glucose (BG) measurements can miss episodes of hyper- and hypoglycemia. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of the Symphony® continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in critically ill cardiac surgery patients. Methods: Fifteen adult cardiac surgery patients were evaluated immediately postoperatively in the intensive care unit. Prelude® SkinPrep prepared the skin and a sensor was applied to 2 test sites on each subject to monitor interstitial fluid glucose. Reference BG was sampled at 30- to 60-minute intervals. The skin at the test sites was inspected for adverse effects. Accuracy of the retrospectively analyzed CGM data relative to reference BG values was determined using continuous glucose-error grid analysis (CG-EGA) and mean absolute relative difference (MARD). Results: Using 570 Symphony CGM glucose readings paired with reference BG measurements, CG-EGA showed that 99.6% of the readings were within zones A and B. BG measurements ranged from 73 to 251 mg/dL. The MARD was 12.3%. No adverse device effects were reported. Conclusions: The Symphony CGM system is able to safely, continuously, and noninvasively monitor glucose in the transdermal interstitial fluid of cardiac surgery intensive care unit patients with accuracy similar to that reported with other CGM systems. Future versions of the system will need real-time data analysis, fast warm-up, and less frequent calibrations to be used in the clinical setting.

11511 Background: Older cancer patients value functional outcomes as much as survival but surgical studies lack functional recovery (FR) data. The international, multicenter GOSAFE study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03299270) aims to evaluate patients’ quality of life (QoL)and FR after cancer surgery and to assess predictors of FR. Methods: GOSAFE prospectively collects functional and clinical data before and after major elective cancer surgery on senior adults (≥70 years). Surgical outcomes are recorded (30 days, 90 days, and 180 dayspost-operatively) with QoL(EQ-5D-3L) and FR (Activities of Daily Living (ADL) + Timed Up and Go (TUG) + MiniCog), 28centers are prospectively enrolling patients; accrual ends February 2019. Results: 643 patients underwent major cancer surgery with curative(94%) or palliative (6%) intent (February 2017-September 2018). Median age was 78(range 70-94); 51.6% males, ASA III-IV 52%. Patients dependent (ADL < 5) were 8%. Frailty was detected by G8 > 14 in 32% and fTRST≥2 in 36% of patients. 639 (99%) lived at home, 32% lived alone, and 88% were able to go out. Major comorbidities (CCI > 6) were detected in 36% and 22% had cognitive impairment according to MiniCog (5% self-reported). 26% had > 3 kg weight loss, 30% were hospitalized in the last 90 days, 45% had ≥3 medications (6% none). For 471 patients, a 90-day comprehensive evaluation was available. Postoperative morbidity was 42% (30 day) and 63.3% (90 day), but Clavien-Dindo III-IV complications were only 11.2% and 17.6%. 90-day mortality was 7.4% (5% 30-day). QoL improved 90 days after surgery (mean EQ-5D index from 0.76 to 0.80). Patients with EQ-5D VAS score > 60 raised from 73.9% at baseline to 82.8% at 90 days. 29% had complete FR (ADL score > 4, MiniCog > 2, TUG < 20). Decreased functional capacity was seen in 23.4% of patients alive at 90-days. Conclusions: GOSAFE is the largest prospective study on older cancer patients undergoing major surgery. Interim analysis reports decreased functional capacity in a quarter of patients. The study will allow clinicians to associate clinical outcomes with individual factors of the preoperative assessment and create a user-friendly tool to predict outcomes that matter to patients.

Complications of colonoscopy can be divided into three main categories: bleeding, perforation, and postpolypectomy syndrome. Several techniques can be undertaken to decrease the likelihood of complications such as diligent use of electrocautery, avoidance of blind pushing while performing colonoscopy, and deceasing looping. When complications do occur, management varies from conservative to minimally invasive techniques to operative exploration with stoma. As surgery becomes less invasive so too has the management of complications with control of bleeding and repair of perforation becoming less invasive with time. Management algorithms for bleeding and perforation secondary to diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy are presented with this chapter.

Perianal manifestations of CD disease are usually chronic in nature, and often characterized by waxing and waning symptoms. The goals of treatment are typically achieved through multimodal management, which minimizes ablative surgical intervention and preserves the sphincter complex [1, 2]. While there is a spectrum of severity in the observed impact of perianal CD, even the minor issues of skin tags and fissuring can present the clinician with difficult decisions in management. In this chapter, we have attempted to provide some clarity to the decision process.

Minimally invasive colorectal surgery continues to evolve. As more is learned about the techniques and surgical and oncologic outcomes, practice and technique are modified. It also becomes clear that new technologies do not always provide improved outcomes, especially in novice hands. Therefore, it remains imperative that clinicians understand the benefits and limitations of each minimally-invasive technique. The goal remains to decrease the impact of surgery and provide an optimal recovery while remaining diligent to provide optimal functional and oncologic outcomes.

Objective: To determine whether glycemic derangements are more effectively controlled using softwareguided insulin dosing compared with paper-based protocols. Patients and Methods: We prospectively evaluated consecutive critically ill patients treated in a tertiary hospital surgical intensive care unit (ICU) between January 1 and June 30, 2008, and between January 1 and September 30, 2009. Paper-based protocol insulin dosing was evaluated as a baseline during the first period, followed by software-guided insulin dosing in the second period. We compared glycemic metrics related to hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and glycemic variability during the 2 periods. Results: We treated 110 patients by the paper-based protocol and 87 by the software-guided protocol during the before and after periods, respectively. The mean ICU admission blood glucose (BG) level was higher in patients receiving software-guided intensive insulin than for those receiving paper-based intensive insulin (181 vs 156 mg/dL; P¼.003, mean of the per-patient mean). Patients treated with software-guided intensive insulin had lower mean BG levels (117 vs 135 mg/dL; P¼.0008), sustained greater time in the desired BG target range (95-135 mg/dL; 68% vs 52%; P¼.0001), had less frequent hypoglycemia (percentage of time BG level was