Search

Remarkable improvements in outcomes for many haematological malignancies have been driven primarily by a proliferation of novel therapeutics over the past two decades. Targeted agents, immune and cellular therapies, and combination regimens have adverse event profiles distinct from conventional finite cytotoxic chemotherapies. In 2018, a Commission comprising patient advocates, clinicians, clinical investigators, regulators, biostatisticians, and pharmacists representing a broad range of academic and clinical cancer expertise examined issues of adverse event evaluation in the context of both newer and existing therapies for haematological cancers. The Commission proposed immediate actions and long-term solutions in the current processes in adverse event assessment, patient-reported outcomes in haematological malignancies, toxicities in cellular therapies, long-term toxicity and survivorship in haematological malignancies, issues in regulatory approval from an international perspective, and toxicity reporting in haematological malignancies and the real-world setting. In this follow-up report, the Commission describes progress that has been made in these areas since the initial report.

African Americans (AAs) have a higher incidence of multiple myeloma (MM) than White patients. Mortality is also higher in AAs compared with White patients. AAs more commonly have immunoglobulin H translocations t(11;14) and t(14;16) compared with White patients. We sought to characterize the demographic representation in MM clinical trials and evaluate outcomes based on race and ethnicity. We conducted a pooled analysis of all trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to support approval of a MM therapeutic between 2006 and 2019. Demographic characteristics were analyzed descriptively. An age-adjusted stratified Cox regression model was used to evaluate the relationship between time-to-event outcomes and race and ethnicity. Nineteen global trials comprising 10 157 patients were pooled. White, Asian, and Black patients comprised 84%, 7%, and 4% of the dataset, respectively; Hispanic patients comprised 4%. The age-adjusted overall survival hazard ratio (HR) for Black compared with White patients was 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.05). The age-adjusted HR for US Black vs US White patients was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66-1.02). For rest-of-world (RoW) Black vs RoW White patients, the HR was 1.31 (95% CI, 0.97-1.77). Black and Hispanic patients were underrepresented in the trials supporting FDA approval of MM drugs. Black patients were primarily enrolled in the United States. Outcomes in US patients were more favorable compared with those in patients in the RoW. Given the higher incidence of MM in AAs and the different disease characteristics, efforts should be made to improve representation of AAs in MM clinical trials.

Narrow eligibility criteria may contribute to underrepresentation of racial and ethnic subgroups in cancer clinical trials. We conducted a retrospective pooled analysis of multicenter, global clinical trials submitted to the U.S. FDA between 2006-2019 to support approval of multiple myeloma (MM) therapies to analyze the rates and reasons for trial ineligibility by race and ethnicity in MM clinical trials. Race and ethnicity were coded per OMB standards. Patients flagged as screen failures were identified as ineligible. Ineligibility rates were calculated as a percentage of patients who were ineligible compared to the screened population within the respective racial and ethnic subgroups. Trial eligibility criteria were grouped into specific categories for analysis of reasons for trial ineligibility. Blacks (25%), and Other (24%) race subgroups had higher ineligibility rates compared to Whites (17%). Asian race had the lowest ineligibility rates (12%) among the racial subgroups. Failure to meet Hematologic Lab Criteria (19%) and failure to meet Treatment Related Criteria (17%) were the most common reasons for ineligibility among Blacks and were more common in Black patients compared to other races. Failure to meet Disease Related Criteria was the most common reason for ineligibility among White (28%) and Asian (29%) participants. Our analysis indicates that specific eligibility criteria may contribute to enrollment disparities for racial and ethnic subgroups in MM clinical trials. However, the small number of screened patients in underrepresented racial and ethnic subgroups limits definitive conclusions.

ImportanceSingle-arm trials have allowed for transformative therapies to be made available to patients expeditiously. However, using single-arm trials to support drug approval presents several challenges that must be carefully considered.ObservationsBetween January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration granted 176 new malignant hematology and oncology indications based on single-arm trials, including 116 accelerated approvals (AAs) and 60 traditional approvals. Overall, 87 approvals (49%) were for new molecular entities or original biologics and 89 (51%) were supplemental indications. Response rate (RR) was the most common end point used to support approval in these single-arm trials (173 of 176 [98%]). Of the 116 AAs based on single-arm trials, 45 (38%) fulfilled their postmarketing requirement to verify clinical benefit, 61 (52%) are pending verification of benefit, and 10 (9%) were withdrawn from the market as of December 31, 2021. Most (56 of 61 [92%]) AAs based on single-arm trials pending verification of benefit occurred during the previous 5 years and have ongoing confirmatory trials as of December 2021.Conclusions and RelevanceSingle-arm trials have been a common development strategy to support regulatory approval as early-stage expansion cohorts with promising durable RRs have become more prevalent. In the appropriate context, single-arm trials using durable RRs can allow patients expedited access to novel therapies and will continue to serve a role in advancing drug development in oncology. However, single-arm trials have a smaller noncomparative safety data set, inability to use time-to-event end points, and other limitations that require careful consideration within the context of the disease and available therapies. The randomized clinical trial remains the preferred approach in clinical investigation.

In January 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved crizotinib for pediatric patients 1 year and older and young adults with relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL). This is the first approval for pediatric sALCL. Approval was based on a single-arm trial of crizotinib monotherapy that included 26 patients, aged 1-20 years, with previously treated sALCL. Efficacy was based on centrally assessed objective response rate (88%) and duration of response. Herein, we highlight unique aspects of the regulatory review, including extension of the indication to young adults, postmarketing safety, and dose optimization strategies.

As cancer immunotherapies continue to expand across all areas of oncology, it is imperative to establish a standardized approach for defining and capturing clinically important toxicities, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS). In this paper, we provide considerations for categorizing the variety of adverse events that may accompany CRS and for recognizing that presentations of CRS may differ among various immunotherapies (e.g., monoclonal antibodies, CAR T cell therapies and T cell engagers, which can include bispecific antibodies and other constructs). The goals of this paper are to ensure accurate and consistent identification of CRS in patients receiving immunotherapies in clinical studies to aid in reporting; enable more precise evaluation of the therapeutic risk-benefit profile and cross-study analyses; support evidence-based monitoring and management of important toxicities related to cancer immunotherapies; and improve patient care and outcomes. These efforts will become more important as the number and variety of molecular targets for immunotherapies broaden and as therapies with novel mechanisms continue to be developed.

The fifth annual Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network Myeloma Intergroup Workshop on Immune Profiling and Minimal Residual Disease Testing in Multiple Myeloma was conducted as one of the American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting Scientific Workshops on Thursday December 3, 2020. This workshop focused on four main topics: (1) integrating minimal residual disease into clinical trial design and practice; (2) the molecular and immunobiology of disease evolution and progression in myeloma; (3) adaptation of next-generation sequencing, next-generation flow cytometry, and cytometry by time of flight techniques; and (4) chimeric antigen receptor T-cell and other cellular therapies for myeloma. In this report, we provide a summary of the workshop presentations and discuss future directions in the field.

The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) Myeloma Intergroup has organized an annual workshop focused on minimal residual disease (MRD) testing and immune profiling (IP) in multiple myeloma since 2016. In 2019, the workshop took place as an American Society of Hematology (ASH) Friday Scientific Workshop entitled “Immune Profiling and Minimal Residual Disease Testing in Multiple Myeloma”. This workshop focused on four main topics: the molecular and immunological evolution of plasma cell disorders, the development of new laboratory- and imaging-based MRD assessment approaches, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy research, and the statistical and regulatory issues associated with novel clinical endpoints. In this report, we provide a summary of the workshop and discuss future directions.

The mortality rate of alveolar hemorrhage (AH) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is greater than 60% with supportive care and high-dose steroid therapy. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis to assess the benefits and risks of recombinant human factor VIIa (rFVIIa) as a therapeutic adjunct for AH. Between 2005 and 2012, 57 episodes of AH occurred in 37 patients. Fourteen episodes (in 14 patients) were treated with steroids alone, and 43 episodes (in 23 patients) were treated with steroids and rFVIIa. The median steroid dose was 1.9 mg/kg/d (interquartile range [IQR], 0.8 to 3.5 mg/kg/d; methylprednisolone equivalents) and did not differ statistically between the 2 groups. The median rFVIIa dose was 41 μg/kg (IQR, 39 to 62 μg/kg), and a median of 3 doses (IQR, 2 to 17) was administered per episode. Concurrent infection was diagnosed in 65% of the episodes. Patients had moderately severe hypoxia (median PaO2/FiO2, 193 [IQR, 141 to 262]); 72% required mechanical ventilation, and 42% survived to extubation. The addition of rFVIIa did not alter time to resolution of AH (P = .50), duration of mechanical ventilation (P = .89), duration of oxygen supplementation (P = .55), or hospital mortality (P = .27). Four possible thrombotic events (9% of 43 episodes) occurred with rFVIIa. rFVIIa in combination with corticosteroids did not confer clear clinical advantages compared with corticosteroids alone. In patients with AH following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, clinical factors (ie, worsening infection, multiple organ failure, or recrudescence of primary disease) may be more important than the benefit of enhanced hemostasis from rFVIIa.

Background: Chronic graft versus host disease of the lungs may result in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), an inflammatory injury to medium size airways leading to fibrosis. BOS is often treated with an increase in immunosuppression which can be associated with systemic complications (e.g. organ dysfunction, increased susceptibility to infection and blunting of graft versus leukemia effect). In order to provide enhanced local delivery of an immunosuppressant, cyclosporine, we studied the effects of cyclosporine inhalation solution (CIS) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients with BOS with a short-term assessment of lung function and inflammatory markers in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Methods: Patients who underwent an allogeneic HSCT meeting the NIH consensus clinical definition of BOS were eligible for inclusion, and were treated with CIS and monitored for treatment response with serial pulmonary function tests (PFTs). At baseline, patients were classified as having stable or progressive disease (i.e. > 10% decline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in the preceding 18 weeks). Response was defined as either improvement or stabilization at week 18. Improvement was defined as an increase in FEV1 (regardless of baseline categorization) > 10%. Stabilization was defined as FEV1 increase or decrease < 10% in patients with progressive disease at baseline, and with a reduction in systemic immunosuppression by 25% in those with stable disease at baseline. Patients with declining FEV1 > 10% were classified as non-responders, and patients with FEV1 decline > 20% or with worsening clinical status were taken off protocol. BALs were performed at study entry and week 18 of treatment. BAL and serum samples were analyzed via a custom Luminex® panel. The 37 analytes studied included the following categories: 1) chemokines (CCL2, 3, 5, 18; CXCL5, 9, 10, 13), 2) cytokines (IL-1β, -1ra, -2, -2rα, -6, -7, -8, -10, -12p70, -15, -17a, -23, -17E/25, TNFα, IFNγ), 3) matrix metalloproteinases (MMP1-3, 7-9, 12-13), 4) growth-factors (VEGF-α, G-CSF), and 5) others (PD-L1, surfactant protein D, osteopontin, myeloperoxidase). Results: In total, 20 HSCT patients with BOS were enrolled (median age 45.5 yrs: range 14-71; 13 men and 7 women), and 11 patients completed the study through week 18. The average time from transplant was 4.6 yrs (range 1-28, median 3 yrs). Baseline FEV1 was 1.18 liters (range 0.5-2.02), and with an average FEV1 of 36% predicted (range 18-56%). At the time of enrollment, 12 patients had stable disease, and 8 had progressive disease. Nine patients discontinued treatment due to either worsening FEV1 by 25% (n=1), relapse of primary disease (n=1), or side effects (n=7; cough and bronchospasm). Sixteen patients were included in the evaluable patient population (patients who received treatment for at least the first two weeks) with 9 responders (4 with improvement, 5 with stabilization) and 7 non-responders. Among those completing the study (n=11), 4 had improvement in FEV1, 5 had stable disease, and 2 were non-responders. Seven patients were continued on CIS through an extended use protocol. The baseline BAL cell differentials demonstrated a neutrophil predominance (66 + 29 %) that persisted at week 18 (56 + 35%). In the BAL, MMP-7 increased from baseline (150 + 215 pg/mL) to week 18 (1956 + 2624 pg/mL; p value 0.049), while soluble PD-L1 levels fell (97 + 55 pg/mL to 55 + 43 pg/mL; p value 0.04). The other categories of biomarkers in BAL were either undetectable (n = 12) or demonstrated no significant difference (n = 23) in patients with or without a clinical response to CIS. Similarly, concomitant serum biomarkers showed no difference in treatment after CIS, even when classified amongst responders and non-responders. Conclusion: In HSCT-BOS, CIS led to an improvement or stabilization of PFTs and/or a decrease in systemic immunosuppression in 9 of the 11 patients that completed the study. Due to cough and bronchospasm, only 11 of 20 patients were able to complete treatment through week 18. Inflammatory markers in the serum and BAL were not elevated at baseline or at the end of study. These data suggest that later stages of BOS may represent progression from a state of inflammatory injury to a fibrotic process. Based on our findings, we believe patients with later stage BOS may benefit from investigational therapeutics targeting lung remodeling. Figure Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. OffLabel Disclosure: Not really. This drug is not commercially available or FDA approved. An IND was obtained for the use of an inhaled formulation of cyclosporine. Aerosolized cyclosporine has been used previously in other patients (lung transplant associated BOS)

Background Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is curative for patients (pts) with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). For SAA pts who lack HLA-identical donors, we explored a HSCT approach that co-infuses PBSCs enriched for CD34+ cells from a haplo-identical relative combined with a single umbilical cord blood unit (UCB). Although most pts undergoing this approach had early haplo-myeloid engraftment that was eventually supplanted by the UCB unit, engraftment patterns were highly variable; in some pts full cord myeloid chimerism was delayed greater than one year, while others had loss of cord engraftment with sustained full haplo-donor myeloid chimerism. Here, we investigated the impact of various patient, UCB, and haplo-donor characteristics, as well as NK cell KIR ligand mismatches between graft sources, on engraftment kinetics following haplo-cord HSCT. Methods Pts with SAA or SAA evolved to MDS unresponsive to immunosuppressive therapy with severe neutropenia (ANC Results 16 pts (median age: 18.9 yrs, range: 4.5-27.9) including 13 SAA and 3 with SAA evolved to MDS underwent haplo-cord transplant. Ten pts received a 4/6, and six pts received a 5/6 HLA-matched UCB unit. A median 3.6x107 TNC/kg (range: 1.96-6.93) from the UCB unit, and 3.3x106CD34+ cells/kg (range: 3.0-4.1) from the haplo-donor were transplanted. All 16 pts had sustained engraftment with 15/15 pts evaluable past day 100 having transfusion independence. At a median follow-up of 570 days (range: 55-1826), 14/16 pts survive for an overall survival rate of 81.8%. Two pts died at day 414 and 402 post-HSCT from viral related complications (CMV pneumonitis and limbic encephalopathy). Neutrophil and platelet recovery occurred at a median 10 (range: 9-22), and 21 (range: 10-213) days post-HSCT, respectively. By post-HSCT day 11, 15/16 pts had neutrophil recovery. Cord myeloid engraftment (cord ANC>500, calculated from chimerism data) occurred in 13/16 pts at a median 42 days. 3/16 did not achieve a cord ANC>500 but had sustained haplo-donor engraftment. The cumulative incidence of acute grade II-IV GvHD was 38.1%. Engraftment profiles were highly variable among pts; 12 achieved full cord chimerism in all cell lineages, 2 remained mixed haplo-cord chimeras, and 2 failed to have UCB engraftment but had sustained 100% haplo-donor myeloid chimerism. Higher degrees of HLA matching (out of 10 alleles) between recipient and UCB unit were associated with faster rates of full cord engraftment (p=0.006) and a higher probability of complete loss of haplo-donor chimerism (p=0.018). KIR ligand incompatibility in the haplo vs. cord direction (defined as the presence of a KIR ligand in the haplo-donor graft that is absent in the UCB unit at HLA epitopes Bw4, HLA-C Group 1 & 2, HLA-A3, and HLA-A11) negatively impacted cord myeloid engraftment. 5/5 (100%) pts who failed to achieve full cord myeloid chimerism by post-HSCT day 400 had haplo vs. cord KIR ligand incompatibility. Moreover, both pts who failed to have UCB engraftment and had sustained haplo-donor chimerism had haplo vs. cord KIR ligand incompatibility. In contrast, only 3/11 (27%) pts who achieved full cord myeloid chimerism post-HSCT by day 231 had haplo vs. cord KIR ligand incompatibility (p=0.026). KIR ligand incompatibility in the cord vs. haplo direction showed no significant effect on haplo-donor myeloid engraftment. Conclusion These results show that haplo-cord HSCT is an effective treatment option for pts with SAA who lack an HLA-matched donor. Further, these results suggest that NK cell alloreactivity, occurring as a consequence of KIR ligand mismatch between the two graft sources, may have a negative impact on cord engraftment when haplo vs. cord KIR ligand incompatibility is present. In summary, this study highlights a novel factor that should be considered during graft selection for haplo-cord transplantation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) is a late-onset non-infectious pulmonary complication of HSCT, resulting in obstructive lung disease. BOS is thought to be a manifestation of chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD). BOS can also occur after lung transplantation, where it is believed to represent chronic rejection of the lung allograft. In both conditions, the mainstay of therapy includes augmentation of systemic immunosuppression. However, this approach has limited efficacy and is associated with deleterious consequences including an increased risk of infection and decreased graft versus tumor/leukemia effects. We investigated whether targeted, local delivery of inhaled cyclosporine could improve or stabilize lung function in BOS patients. Methods HSCT recipients with BOS, ages 10-80, were eligible if they met the following inclusion criteria: FEV110% compared to pre-transplant FEV1, no evidence of pulmonary infection as a causative etiology, and one of the following: FEV1/FVC ratio Results Eleven subjects (nine evaluable) have been enrolled (median age: 45 years; range: 14-73). Nine subjects had HSCT-associated BOS, and 2 had lung-transplant-associated BOS. Patients were transplanted for various underlying conditions (MDS, aplastic anemia, DLBCL, MM, ALL, Gata-2 deficiency, alpha-1 anti-trypsin deficiency, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis). HSCT recipients received both reduced intensity (n=4) and myeloablative (n=5) conditioning, with allografts from HLA matched relatives (n=5) or unrelated donors (n=4). The median time from BOS diagnosis to study enrollment was 9 months (range: 2-37 mos). The median FEV1 at study entry was 1.11 liters (range: 0.5-2.11), with 4 subjects having progressive disease and 7 stable disease. Adverse events associated with CIS occurred in 9/10 patients and included cough, bronchospasm, and dyspnea. Most adverse events were grade 2 (range:1-3) and occurred only during the inhalation. Three subjects went off-study (patient choice) prior to completion of the 18 weeks due to adverse events and were considered non-responders. Four of the 8 (50%) HSCT- associated BOS subjects had a response, including 3 patients with progressive disease and 1 with stable disease at study entry. Among these responders, the improvements in absolute FEV1 from baseline were 19.5%, 15%, 12.7%, and 3.4% respectively (figure). Among the responding patients, 2 were also able to decrease their systemic steroid administration by 50% and 43%. An improvement in 6MWT was noted in 1/4 responders. Four responders have enrolled onto an extension protocol. The median peak systemic absorption of cyclosporine was 99 mcg/L (Range: 32-263) 20 minutes post-CIS inhalation. Lung deposition studies showed the total deposited dose averaged 12% (range: 4-20 %) of the inhaled dose. Conclusions Inhaled cyclosporine can be delivered safely and can stabilize or improve lung function in HSCT recipients with severe BOS, allowing systemic immunosuppression to be reduced. Use of local, targeted therapy with CIS resulted in minimal systemic absorption compared to typical oral administration, and achieved high drug levels in the lung tissue as demonstrated by the lung deposition results. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract 2352 Introduction/Methods: The administration of highly purified haploidentical peripheral blood CD34+ cells combined with an unrelated cord blood transplant results in earlier neutrophil engraftment than is typically seen with a cord blood transplant alone. Chimerism data from pilot trials evaluating this strategy have reported 3 phases of engraftment: 1) early myeloid engraftment from transplanted haplo-CD34+ cells followed by 2) cord blood engraftment resulting in dual chimerism and 3) the subsequent disappearance of haploidentical donor cells with resultant full donor cord chimerism. The mechanism accounting for the disappearance of haploidentical cells has not been defined. Here the clinical results and an in vitro assessment of alloreactivity in three patients that underwent combined haploidentical CD34+ cell and cord blood transplantation for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) are described. The conditioning regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide (60mg/kg/day on days -7 and -6), fludarabine (25mg/m2/day on days -5 to -1), horse ATG (40mg/kg/day on days -5 to -2), and total body irradiation (200cGy on day -1). GVHD prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. PCR of STRs was used to assess chimerism in T-cell and myeloid lineages and mixed lymphocyte reaction assays(MLR) were performed on peripheral blood samples collected at different time-points post-transplant to assess for alloreactivity against the recipient, the haploidentical donor, or the cord unit. Stimulator cord blood cells for the MLR were obtained from residual cord blood cells remaining in the infusion bag after patient administration and expanded in vitro using anti-CD28/CD3 Dynabeads. Results: Prior to transplantation, all three pts had transfusion dependent SAA associated with severe neutropenia that was refractory to conventional immunosuppressive therapy. Pt 1 had an early transient myeloid recovery (ANC 400 on day+11) from the haploidentical donor followed by engraftment of the cord unit (Cord ANC > 500) on day 21. The patient is currently 2 years post transplant and has 100% cord blood chimerism and is transfusion independent. An MLR assay performed when donor T-cell chimerism was 100% cord, showed evidence for rejection of the haploid cells by cord blood T-cells, with the MLR response to haploidentical donor cells being seven fold higher than the response to fully HLA-mismatched 3rd party cells. In pt 2, neutrophil recovery from the transplanted haploidentical donor occurred on day +10, with chimerism studies showing no evidence for cord engraftment in either myeloid or T-cell lineages at any point post-transplant. The patient is currently 15 months post transplant and is transfusion independent with normal blood counts and sustained “split” chimerism (T-cells recipient in origin with myeloid cells being 100% haploidentical donor). MLR assays showed that the recipient was tolerant to the haploid donor, with no statistically significant difference in the alloreactive response to the haploid donor compared to self. In pt 3, neutrophil recovery from the transplanted haploidentical donor occurred on day +10, with chimerism studies showing split chimerism (T-cell chimerism >90% cord and myeloid chimerism 88–100% haploid donor in origin). MLR assays again showed evidence of rejection of the haploid cells by cord blood T-cells, with a trend towards greater alloreactivity against the haploid donor compared to an HLA mismatched 3rd party on post-transplant day +63. Conclusions: Combined haploidentical CD34+ cell and unrelated cord blood transplantation following highly immunosuppressive conditioning represents a viable treatment option for patients with SAA who lack an HLA-matched donor. Using this approach, 2 of 3 pts had cord blood engraftment associated with early neutrophil recovery from the haploidentical donor. In one pt, the cord unit failed to engraft. Remarkably, sustained engraftment from the haploidentical donor in this pt resulted in transfusion independence. MLR appears to be a useful approach to assess the in vitro alloreactivity of this unique stem cell graft source. In the two pts who had cord engraftment, in vitro MLR assessments established that the disappearance of haploid cells occurred as a consequence of rejection of the haploidentical cells by engrafting cord blood T-cells, rather than from non-immunological haploidentical cell graft failure. Download : Download high-res image (244KB) Download : Download full-size image Figure 1. . Results expressed as countsper minute (CPM). Pt 1 MLR was performed day + 101 post-transplant. (T-cell chemerism was 100% cord). The alloreactiveresponse to the haploidentical donor is seven fold higher than the response to HLA-mismatched 3rd party, suggesting, there is rejecttion of the haploid donor by the cordunit. In Pt 2. the cord unit failed to engraft, the MLR was performed on day +99 (T-cell chimerism 100% recipient, myeloid 99% hapolied donor). The alloreactiver esponse to the haploid donor was similar to the response to self. suggestomg tolerance. In pt 3. thee MLR was performed day +63 post-transplant (T-cell chimerism 79% cord. 22% recipient; Myeloid Chimerism 100% haploid donor). There is a trend to wards a greater alloreactive response against haploid donor compared to 3rd party, suggesting early rejection. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Animal models show infusions of donor NK cells given after allogeneic HCT can prevent GVHD while simultaneously mediating a graft-vs-tumor effect. However, it is unclear whether adoptively infused NK cells can mediate these beneficial effects in the presence of CSA, which is commonly given after HCT to prevent GVHD. In this study, we analyzed the in vitro effects of pharmacological concentrations of CSA on NK cell phenotype, cell proliferation, and tumor cytotoxicity. We also evaluated in vivo whether CSA administration would reduce the anti-tumor effects of adoptively infused NK cells in tumor bearing mice. PBMCs collected from healthy donors were labeled with CFSE then were stimulated in vitro with IL-2 for 7 days in the presence or absence of CSA (1000ng/ml). CFSE proliferation assays on fresh PBMC showed CSA inhibited IL-2 stimulated CD3+ T-cell proliferation more than CD3−/CD56+ NK cell proliferation (mean percentage inhibition of proliferation 49.4% vs. 22.2% for T cells and NK cells respectively; p

Both early- and late-onset noninfectious pulmonary injury are important contributors to the nonrelapse mortality seen after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), particularly in subjects conditioned with high-dose total body irradiation (TBI). To characterize the kinetics of recovery from pulmonary injury in long-term survivors, we collected data on 138 subjects who survived > 3 years (median survival, 10.2 years) after predominantly TBI-based allo-SCT from their HLA-matched siblings. Baseline pulmonary function tests served as the reference for subsequent measurements at 3, 5, 10, and 15 years for each survivor. The only parameter showing a clinically and statistically significant decline post-transplant was adjusted diffusion capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), which reached a nadir at 5 years but surprisingly normalized at the 10-year mark. Multivariable modeling identified chronic graft-versus-host disease (P < .02) and abnormal baseline-adjusted DLCO (P < .03) as the only significant factors associated with the decline in adjusted DLCO at 5 years but excluded smoking, conditioning intensity, baseline C-reactive protein level, TBI dose to the lungs, disease, and demographic variables. In conclusion, pulmonary injury as monitored by the adjusted DLCO continues to deteriorate in the first 5 years after allo-SCT but recovers at 10 years.