Search

Abstract. This article describes three emerging, novel cancer immunotherapies: BITE, TIL and cancer vaccines are therapies that recognize specific targets on cancer cells and trigger a specific immune response. So far, not all tumor types can benefit from these approaches the best results have been observed in hematological malignancies, melanoma, and lung cancer. These novel biological products are currently being tested in several cancer centers in Switzerland, and physicians must be familiar with these procedures, as some of their patients might be treated with such therapies in the near future.

BACKGROUND Patients with advanced squamous-cell lung cancer (SQCLC) frequently (46%) exhibit tumor overexpression of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA). Rogaratinib is a novel oral pan-FGFR inhibitor with a good safety profile and anti-tumor activity in early clinical trials as a single agent in FGFR pathway-addicted tumors. SAKK 19/18 determined clinical activity of rogaratinib in patients with advanced SQCLC overexpressing FGFR1-3 mRNA. METHODS Patients with advanced SQCLC failing standard systemic treatment and with FGFR1-3 mRNA tumor overexpression as defined in the protocol received rogaratinib 600 mg BID until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. A 6-months progression-free survival rate (6mPFS) ≤15 % was considered uninteresting (H0), whereas a 6mPFS ≥38 % was considered promising (H1). According to a Simon 2-stage design, 2 out of 10 patients of the first stage were required to be progression-free at 6 months. Comprehensive Genomic Profiling was performedusing the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus (Thermo Fisher Scientific). RESULTS Between July 2019 and November 2020, 49 patients were screened and 20 were classified FGFR-positive. Among a total of 15 patients, 6mPFS was reached in 1 patient (6.7 %), resulting in trial closure for futility after the first stage. There were 7 (46.7 %) patients with stable disease and 5 (33.3 %) patients with progressive disease. Median PFS was 1.6 (95 % CI 0.9-3.5) months and median overall survival (OS) 3.5 (95 % CI 1.0-5.9) months. Most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included hyperphosphatemia in 8 (53 %), diarrhea in 5 (33 %), stomatitis in 3 (20 %) and nail changes in 3 (20 %) patients. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 6 (40 %) patients. No associations between mutational profile and treatment outcome were observed. CONCLUSION Despite preliminary signals of activity, rogaratinib failed to improve PFS in patients with advanced SQCLC overexpressing FGFR mRNA. FGFR inhibitors in SQCLC remain a challenging field, and more in-depth understanding of pathway crosstalks may lead to the development of drug combinations with FGFR inhibitors resulting in improved outcomes.

Previous cancer vaccination trials often aimed to activate CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) responses with short (8–10mer) peptides and targeted CD4+ helper T cells (TH) with HLA class II–binding longer peptides (12–16 mer) that were derived from tumor antigens. Accordingly, a study of immunomonitoring focused on the detection of CTL responses to the short, and TH responses to the long, peptides. The possible induction of concurrent TH responses to short peptides was widely neglected. In a recent phase I vaccination trial, 53 patients with different solid cancers were vaccinated with EMD640744, a cocktail of five survivin-derived short (9- or 10-mer) peptides in Montanide ISA 51VG. We monitored 49 patients and found strong CD8+ T-cell responses in 63% of the patients. In addition, we unexpectedly found CD4+ TH cell responses against at least two of the five short peptides in 61% (23/38) of the patients analyzed. The two peptides were recognized by HLA-DP4– and HLA-DR–restricted TH1 cells. Some short peptide–reactive (sp)CD4 T cells showed high functional avidity. Here, we show that a short peptide vaccine is able to activate a specific CD4+ T-cell repertoire in many patients, facilitating a strong combined CD4+/CD8+ T-cell response. Cancer Immunol Res; 4(1); 18–25. ©2015 AACR.

Short peptide vaccine induces CD4+ T helper cells in patients with different solid cancers - desription of methods according to MIATA guidelines(MIATA checklist)

(1) Gating strategy, (2) representative examples of the time course of spCD4 responses, (3) individual cytokine profile and magnitude of spCD4 responses of all patients with detected spCD4 T cell response

A blended learning program to promote the consultation expertise of pediatric oncologists (POs) on complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) was developed and completed by POs as part of a training program. A previous study indicated that POs in Germany were in need of information and training on CIM, and that there were no medical training offers on the subject in Germany.Evaluation of e-learning (questionnaires) and practically oriented one-day, face-to-face workshops (questionnaires, simulation patients), the workshops were evaluated with regard to changes in quality of physician-patient interaction and with regard of the participants' feedback.32 POs signed up for the program and completed the e-learning. 22 POs participated in one of the workshops. POs agreed that they had received professionally relevant content during the e-learning. The questionnaires on physician-patient interaction showed neither clear positive nor negative changes concerning the quality of interaction. The feedback from the participants on the workshop was very positive.Following the end of the blended learning program the e-learning was made available again for interested POs. 34 further applications were received for participation in this part of the training program. With around 300 POs in Germany, this shows a high demand for further training offers of this kind as well as a need for further development.Ein Blended-Learning-Programm zur Förderung der Beratungskompetenz von pädiatrischen Onkologen zur komplementären und integrativen Medizin (CIM) wurde entwickelt und von pädiatrischen Onkologen im Rahmen eines Fortbildungsangebots absolviert. Eine vorangegangene Studie zeigte, dass bei pädiatrischen Onkologen in Deutschland ein Informations- und Trainingsbedarf zu CIM bestand, entsprechende ärztliche Fortbildungsangebote zum Thema in Deutschland aber noch nicht vorlagen.Evaluation des E-Learnings (Fragebögen) und der praxisorientierten, eintägigen Vorort-Workshops (Fragebögen, Simulationspatienten); die Workshops wurden hinsichtlich Veränderung der Qualität der Arzt/Patienten-Interaktion und hinsichtlich des Feedbacks der Teilnehmenden evaluiert.32 pädiatrische Onkologen registrierten sich zum Programm und absolvierten das E-Learning, 22 nahmen an einem der Workshops teil. Die pädiatrischen Onkologen bestätigten dass sie professionelle, wichtige Inhalte durch das E-learning erhalten konnten. Die Fragebögen zur Arzt/Patienten-Interaktion zeigten keine klare positive oder negative Veränderung in der Bewertung der Qualität der Interaktion. Das Feedback der Teilnehmenden zum Workshop war sehr positiv.Nach Abschluss des Programms wurde das E-Learning für weitere ärztliche Interessenten geöffnet. 34 weitere Anmeldungen für die Nutzung dieses Teils des Programms gingen ein. Bei ungefähr 300 pädiatrischen Onkologen in Deutschland verdeutlicht diese Teilnahme eine hohe Nachfrage an Fortbildungsangeboten dieser Art sowie eine Notwendigkeit der Weiterentwicklung dieser.

Purpose:Sabatolimab (MBG453) and spartalizumab are mAbs that bind T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3 (TIM-3) and programmed death-1 (PD-1), respectively. This phase I/II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of sabatolimab, with or without spartalizumab, in patients with advanced solid tumors.Patients and Methods:Primary objectives of the phase I/Ib part were to characterize the safety and estimate recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for future studies. Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian (hierarchical) logistic regression model. Sabatolimab was administered intravenously, 20 to 1,200 mg, every 2 or 4 weeks (Q2W or Q4W). Spartalizumab was administered intravenously, 80 to 400 mg, Q2W or Q4W.Results:Enrolled patients (n = 219) had a range of cancers, most commonly ovarian (17%) and colorectal cancer (7%); patients received sabatolimab (n = 133) or sabatolimab plus spartalizumab (n = 86). The MTD was not reached. The most common adverse event suspected to be treatment-related was fatigue (9%, sabatolimab; 15%, combination). No responses were seen with sabatolimab. Five patients receiving combination treatment had partial responses (6%; lasting 12–27 months) in colorectal cancer (n = 2), non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), malignant perianal melanoma, and SCLC. Of the five, two patients had elevated expression of immune markers in baseline biopsies; another three had >10% TIM-3–positive staining, including one patient with NSCLC who received prior PD-1 therapy.Conclusions:Sabatolimab plus spartalizumab was well tolerated and showed preliminary signs of antitumor activity. The RP2D for sabatolimab was selected as 800 mg Q4W (alternatively Q3W or Q2W schedules, based on modeling), with or without 400 mg spartalizumab Q4W.

Supplementary Materials

Purpose:The prognosis for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) is poor, and only a minority of patients benefit from checkpoint immunotherapy. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), an oncolytic immunotherapy approved for advanced melanoma, in combination with pembrolizumab may yield enhanced antitumor activity over either agent alone.Patients and Methods:This was a phase Ib/III, multicenter trial testing intratumoral T-VEC combined with intravenous pembrolizumab in R/M HNSCC refractory to platinum-based chemotherapy. For phase Ib, primary endpoint was incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Key secondary endpoints included objective response rate and progression-free survival per irRECIST, overall survival, and safety.Results:Thirty-six patients were enrolled into the phase Ib study. The data cut-off date was August 28, 2018. Median follow-up was 5.8 months (range, 0.3–24.2). One DLT of T-VEC–related fatal arterial hemorrhage was reported. Twenty (55.6%) and 21 (58.3%) patients experienced adverse events (AE) related to T-VEC and pembrolizumab, respectively. Besides the DLT, there were no treatment-related fatal AEs. A confirmed partial response was observed in 5 (13.9%) patients. Ten (27.8%) patients were unevaluable for response due to early death. Median PFS and OS were 3.0 months [95% confidence interval (Cl), 2.0–5.8] and 5.8 months (95% Cl, 2.9–11.4), respectively.Conclusions:The combination of T-VEC and pembrolizumab demonstrated a tolerable safety profile in R/M HNSCC. The efficacy with the combination was similar to that with pembrolizumab monotherapy in historical HNSCC studies. Phase III part of this study was not further pursued (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02626000).

Confirmed best overall response per irRECIST by baseline PD-L1 CPS of {greater than or equal to} 1, {greater than or equal to} 20, and {greater than or equal to} 50

Change from baseline in tumor burden of target lesions at patient level

IntroductionIntraperitoneal dissemination is a major problem resulting in very poor prognosis and a rapid marked deterioration in the quality of life of patients. Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an emergent laparoscopic procedure aiming to maximise local efficacy and to reduce systemic side effects.Methods and analysisNab-PIPAC, a bicentre open-label phase IB, aims to evaluate safety of nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin association using in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of gastric, pancreatic or ovarian origin as ≥1 prior line of systemic therapy. Using a 3+3 design, sequential intraperitoneal laparoscopic application of nab-paclitaxel (7.5, 15, 25, 37.5, 52.5 and 70 mg/m2) and cisplatin (10.5 mg/m2) through a nebuliser to a high-pressure injector at ambient temperature with a maximal upstream pressure of 300 psi. Treatment maintained for 30 min at a pressure of 12 mm Hg and repeated4–6 weeks intervals for three courses total.A total of 6–36 patients are expected, accrual is ongoing. Results are expected in 2024.The primary objective of Nab-PIPAC trial is to assess tolerability and safety of nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin combination administered intraperitoneally by PIPAC in patients with PC of gastric, pancreatic or ovarian origin. This study will determine maximum tolerated dose and provide pharmacokinetic data.Ethic and disseminationEthical approval was obtained from the ethical committees of Geneva and Vaud (CCER-2018-01327). The study findings will be published in an open-access, peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences and research meetings.Trial registration numberNCT04000906.

Dendritic cells (DC) play a major role during the priming phase of anti-tumor immunization, as they are required for an efficient tumor-associated antigens presentation. At least one dendritic cell-based therapy has already been successfully approved by regulators for clinical application in prostate cancer patients. Moreover, DC development is dependent on the granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), a cytokine that has been successfully used as a potent inducer of anti-tumoral immunity. To better understand the relation between DC and GM-CSF in anti-tumor immunity, we studied the DC function in mice lacking the cytokine receptor common subunit beta (βc-/-) for GM-CSF, IL-3 and IL-5 and immunized with irradiated tumor cells. Such immunization induces a protective, specific tumor immunization in wild-type mice, while βc-/- mice failed to mount an immune response. Upon in vitro stimulation, DC from βc-/- mice (DCβc-/-) are unable to undergo a full maturation level. In vivo experiments show that they lack the ability to prevent tumor growth, in contrast to DCWT. Moreover, matured DCWT rescued immunization in βc-/- mice. DC maturation is dependent on a functional pathway involving GM-CSF signaling through a biologically functional receptor. These findings may contribute to new strategies for efficient anti-tumor immunotherapies.

Extra-osseous Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a rare and aggressive malignant tumor found in a variety of organs. Primary ES of the thyroid is exceedingly rare and few cases have been documented to date. We describe the case of a 54-year old woman with a history of breast carcinoma in whom a unique hypermetabolic left thyroid nodule was identified during a follow-up PET-CT scan. An ultrasound examination showed a hypoechogenic nodule of 3.7 cm. A cytological diagnosis of poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma was made, and a total thyroidectomy was performed. The surgical specimen revealed a poorly differentiated neoplasm composed of medium-sized cells with scant cytoplasm, expressing pancytokeratin, CD99 and NKX2.2 but lacking p63 and p40 expression. Molecular analysis revealed a EWSR1-FLI1 fusion transcript supporting the diagnosis of a primary extra-osseous ES of the thyroid. The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy and has no evidence of recurrent disease.

Introduction: Systemic therapy with CTLA-4 blocking antibody (aCTLA-4) restores endogenous antitumor immunity and induces remarkable long-term clinical benefits in patients with melanoma. Yet immune-related side effects remain a major hurdle to extending its label to many more types of cancer. Intra- and peritumoral administration of aCTLA-4 has recently emerged as a means to optimize its dose/efficacy ratio while preventing its off-target, systemic toxicities. Sustained peritumoral delivery of low-dose aCTLA-4 by genetically engineered encapsulated cells could offer a promising option for cancer treatment addressing the shortcomings of systemic therapy. Material and Methods: The efficacy of sustained, low-dose aCTLA-4 delivered by genetically engineered encapsulated cells was assessed in human CTLA4 knock-in mice subcutaneously engrafted with MC38 colon adenocarcinoma cells. In a therapeutic model, mice were treated with either encapsulated human myoblast cells secreting aCTLA-4 (MVX-3) in the vicinity of the tumor, or i.p. injections of Ipilimumab (10mg/kg BIW x 4). Encapsulated wild-type cells (WT) and PBS were used as respective controls. A subgroup of mice was terminated at day 7 post-treatment for early pharmacological characterization. Tumor size and survival were measured to evaluate the efficacy. Secretion of aCTLA-4 by MVX-3 and aCTLA-4 titer in plasma was quantified by ELISA. Tumors, spleens, and draining lymph nodes were collected for flow cytometry analyses. Results: Peritumoral administration of MVX-3 induced durable complete tumor rejection (2/7) and tumor growth control (4/7) when administered at doses 1’000 times lower than i.p ipilimumab, whereas rapid tumor growth without any tumor rejection was observed in mice treated with control vehicles. I.p. ipilimumab induced durable complete tumor rejection (9/12), while treatment-related toxicities upon dosing led to premature mice termination (3/12). MVX-3 was found as equally effective as i.p. ipilimumab in decreasing the proportion of CTLA4+ helper and regulatory T cells in the tumor at Day 7 post-treatment. Survival was also improved by MVX-3 compared to control vehicles. Conclusions: These findings suggest that sustained delivery of low-dose aCTLA-4 by genetically engineered encapsulated cells to the tumor microenvironment could achieve similar therapeutic benefits as systemic therapy, without the commonly associated toxicities. The safety and biological efficacy profile of MVX-3 encourage further preclinical and clinical explorations. Citation Format: Julien Grogg, Emily Charrier, Remi Vernet, Muriel Urwyler, Olivier Von Rohr, Valentin Saingier, Fabien Courtout, Aurelien Lathuiliere, Adrien Engel, Nicolas Mach. Sustained delivery of low-dose anti-CTLA-4 by genetically engineered encapsulated cells to the tumor microenvironment drives tumor response and prolongs survival in a colorectal cancer model [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 2721.

Purpose: These are the final results of a national registry on cancer patients with COVID-19 in Switzerland. Methods: We collected data on symptomatic COVID-19-infected cancer patients from 23 Swiss sites over a one-year period starting on 1 March 2020. The main objective was to assess the outcome (i.e., mortality, rate of hospitalization, ICU admission) of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients; the main secondary objective was to define prognostic factors. Results: From 455 patients included, 205 patients (45%) had non-curative disease, 241 patients (53%) were hospitalized for COVID-19, 213 (47%) required oxygen, 43 (9%) invasive ventilation and 62 (14%) were admitted to the ICU. Death from COVID-19 infection occurred in 98 patients, resulting in a mortality rate of 21.5%. Age ≥65 years versus

Purpose: The prognosis for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) is poor, and only a minority of patients benefit from checkpoint immunotherapy. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), an oncolytic immunotherapy approved for advanced melanoma, in combination with pembrolizumab may yield enhanced antitumor activity over either agent alone. Patients and Methods: This was a phase Ib/III, multicenter trial testing intratumoral T-VEC combined with intravenous pembrolizumab in R/M HNSCC refractory to platinum-based chemotherapy. For phase Ib, primary endpoint was incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Key secondary endpoints included objective response rate and progression-free survival per irRECIST, overall survival, and safety. Results: Thirty-six patients were enrolled into the phase Ib study. The data cut-off date was August 28, 2018. Median follow-up was 5.8 months (range, 0.3–24.2). One DLT of T-VEC–related fatal arterial hemorrhage was reported. Twenty (55.6%) and 21 (58.3%) patients experienced adverse events (AE) related to T-VEC and pembrolizumab, respectively. Besides the DLT, there were no treatment-related fatal AEs. A confirmed partial response was observed in 5 (13.9%) patients. Ten (27.8%) patients were unevaluable for response due to early death. Median PFS and OS were 3.0 months [95% confidence interval (Cl), 2.0–5.8] and 5.8 months (95% Cl, 2.9–11.4), respectively. Conclusions: The combination of T-VEC and pembrolizumab demonstrated a tolerable safety profile in R/M HNSCC. The efficacy with the combination was similar to that with pembrolizumab monotherapy in historical HNSCC studies. Phase III part of this study was not further pursued (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02626000).

4515 Background: SAKK 06/17 investigated the addition of perioperative immunotherapy with the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab (Durva) in the multimodality treatment of resectable MIUC. While most similar trials had a primary endpoint of pathological complete remission rate, this study evaluated the clinically more relevant primary endpoint of event-free survival (EFS) at 2 years (yrs). Methods: SAKK 06/17 was an open-label, single-arm phase II study including 61 cisplatin-fit patients (pts) with stage cT2-T4a cN0-1 operable MIUC. Pts received four cycles of neoadjuvant Cis/Gem q3w in combination with 4 cycles Durva 1500mg q3w followed by complete resection. Adjuvant Durva 1500mg q4w was given for 10 cycles or a maximum of 40 weeks. The primary endpoint was EFS at 2 yrs after neoadjuvant trial treatment (NAT) start. An event was defined as progression during NAT, appearance of metastases, locoregional recurrence after surgery or death from any cause. 58 pts were needed based on one-sided type I error 10% and power 80% for H1 EFS at 2 yrs ≥ 65% compared to H0 EFS at 2 yrs ≤ 50%. Secondary endpoints included pathological response, recurrence free survival after R0 resection (RFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. We report the primary analysis of the full analysis set (FAS, received at least one dose of Durva). Results: 61 pts were included between July 2018 and September 2019 at 12 sites. Median follow up is 28.1 months (95%CI 27.8-28.4). FAS consisted of 58 pts (79% male, median age 68 yrs) with bladder cancer (95%) or upper urinary tract/urethral cancer (5%). Clinical T2, T3, T4 stage was present at diagnosis in 69%, 21%, 10%, respectively, and 17% had cN1. Resection was performed in 53 pts (91%; 4 refused, 1 unresectable) with R0 resection in 52 pts (98%). 48 (91%) of resected pts started adjuvant Durva and 32 (67%) completed it. Pathological response < ypT2 ypN0 was achieved in 32 pts (18 pts ypT0 and 14 pts ypT1/a/is), corresponding to 60% of resected pts and 55% of the FAS. EFS at 2 yrs was overall 76.1% (one-sided 90% CI (lower bound): 67.6%; 95% CI 62.3% - 85.3%), for ypT1/a/is 92.9% and for ypT0 100%. RFS at 2 yrs after R0 resection (N=52) was 83.5% (95% CI 69.6% - 91.4%) and OS at 2 yrs for the FAS population was 87.3% (95% CI 73.8% - 94.1%). Grade 1, 2, 3, 4 adverse events attributed to Durva during overall treatment were 14%, 35%, 19%, 7%, respectively. Conclusions: The addition of perioperative Durvalumab to the standard of care for pts with resectable MIUC results in a high EFS, RFS and OS at 2 yrs, especially for pts with downstaging to

This phase 1 study evaluated safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of obinutuzumab in combination with venetoclax in patients with previously untreated grade 1-3a follicular lymphoma in need of systemic therapy. Two DLs of venetoclax were evaluated with an expansion cohort at the recommended phase 2 dose. Twenty-five patients were enrolled. The recommended phase 2 dose was venetoclax 800 mg OD continuously for 6 cycles starting on day 2 of cycle 1, with obinutuzumab 1000 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1 and on day 1 of cycles 2 to 6, followed by obinutuzumab maintenance every 2 months for 2 years. Only 1 patient had a DLT consisting of grade 4 thrombocytopenia after the first obinutuzumab infusion. Neutropenia was the most common adverse event of grade ≥3 at least possibly attributed to study treatment. Twenty-four patients were evaluable for response after cycle 6 by computed tomography (CT) and 19 by positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT): overall and complete response rates were 87.5% (95% CI, 67.6% to 97.3%) and 25% (95% CI, 9.8% to 46.7%) in the CT-evaluated patients and 84.2% (95% CI, 60.4% to 96.6%) and 68.4% (95% CI, 43.4% to 87.4%), respectively, in the PET/CT-evaluated patients. One-year progression-free survival was 77.8% (95% CI, 54.6% to 90.1%) and 79% (95% CI, 47.9% to 92.7%) for CT and PET/CT-evaluable patients, respectively, whereas progression-free survival at 30 months was 73.2% (95% CI, 49.8%, 87.0%) as assessed by CT and 79.0% (95% CI, 47.9%, 92.7%) by PET/CT. Despite the activity observed, our results do not support further development of the combination in this patient population. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02877550.

Purpose:Sabatolimab (MBG453) and spartalizumab are mAbs that bind T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3 (TIM-3) and programmed death-1 (PD-1), respectively. This phase I/II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of sabatolimab, with or without spartalizumab, in patients with advanced solid tumors.Patients and Methods:Primary objectives of the phase I/Ib part were to characterize the safety and estimate recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for future studies. Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian (hierarchical) logistic regression model. Sabatolimab was administered intravenously, 20 to 1,200 mg, every 2 or 4 weeks (Q2W or Q4W). Spartalizumab was administered intravenously, 80 to 400 mg, Q2W or Q4W.Results:Enrolled patients (n = 219) had a range of cancers, most commonly ovarian (17%) and colorectal cancer (7%); patients received sabatolimab (n = 133) or sabatolimab plus spartalizumab (n = 86). The MTD was not reached. The most common adverse event suspected to be treatment-related was fatigue (9%, sabatolimab; 15%, combination). No responses were seen with sabatolimab. Five patients receiving combination treatment had partial responses (6%; lasting 12–27 months) in colorectal cancer (n = 2), non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), malignant perianal melanoma, and SCLC. Of the five, two patients had elevated expression of immune markers in baseline biopsies; another three had >10% TIM-3–positive staining, including one patient with NSCLC who received prior PD-1 therapy.Conclusions:Sabatolimab plus spartalizumab was well tolerated and showed preliminary signs of antitumor activity. The RP2D for sabatolimab was selected as 800 mg Q4W (alternatively Q3W or Q2W schedules, based on modeling), with or without 400 mg spartalizumab Q4W.

Patients with cancer experience higher burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection, disease severity, complications, and mortality, compared to the general population. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines have shown to be highly effective in clinical trials; however, few data are available on the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with cancer. Using a prospective cohort study design, we assessed the seroconversion rates and anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody titers following the 1st and 2nd dose of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with cancer at centers in U.S. and Europe from January 2021 to April 2021. Among 131 patients included in the immunogenicity analysis, most (94%) developed antibody levels; however, 6% showed no seroconversion after completing the mRNA vaccination series. No differences in seroconversion rates were observed between BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccine groups. Patients with solid tumors (98%) were much more likely to seroconvert and develop higher antibody titers than those with hematological malignancy (77%). Although seroconversion rates were consistently high in patients receiving different types of anti-cancer therapy except anti-CD-20 antibody; the antibody titers were much lower in patients who received cytotoxic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or monoclonal antibody compared to those on clinical surveillance or receiving endocrine therapy within six months prior to vaccination. None of the patients on anti-CD-20 antibody therapy developed an antibody response, even after receiving 2 doses of the vaccines. After correlating with cell-mediated immunity in a subset of patients at high-risk for antibody non-response, we propose exploring the addition of a second booster, or convalescent plasma therapy, or postpone vaccination until after completion of their specific anti-cancer treatment. Although encouraging results, we suggest high-risk vaccinated patients with cancer to continue taking safety precautions until their immune response is confirmed at 4 weeks after 2nd dose of mRNA vaccines. We also highly encourage all eligible individuals in the general population to get vaccinated to ensure the protection of the most vulnerable groups, such as those with cancer. Funding: This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from National Cancer Institute grant P30 CA054174 (Mays Cancer Center at University of Texas Health San Antonio MD Anderson); and grant MRSG-16-152-01-CCE the American Cancer Society and Hope Foundation for Cancer Research. A ‘Research & Development Program’ grant from Geneva University Hospitals awarded to Natacha Bordry funded part of this study. Declaration of Interest: Dr. Addeo reported receiving personal fees for attending advisory from Bristol‐Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Merck Sharp and Dohme,Astella, Eli Lilly and Boehringer‐Ingelheim. He has received fees for speaking bureau for Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, MSD for work performed outside of the current study. Dr. P. Shah reported receiving grant from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority outside of this work. Dr Labidi-Galy reported receiving personal fees for attending advisory from AstraZeneca. Proferssor Mach is a founder and minority shareholder of MaxiVAX SA, a private biotech company based in Geneva Switzerland, working on personalized cancer immunotherapy and infectious disease vaccines; with no impact on the current manuscript. Dr. Taylor reported funding from NIAID/NIH and the COVID-19 Prevention Network which conducts COVID-19 vaccine trials. Dr. Patel reported receiving grant support from the National Institutes of Health, Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas, ThriveWell Foundation and the Bill and Ella Owens Medical Foundation outside of this work Dr. Wang reported receiving grants from 80/20 Foundation, National Institute of Health, and Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation. Dr. Mesa reported receiving research support from Celgene, Incyte, Abbvie, Samus, Genotech, Promedior, and CTI; and consulting fees from Novartis, Sierra Onc, LaJolla, and Pharma. Dr. D. Shah reported receiving grants from American Cancer Society and Hope Foundation for Cancer Research during the conduct of the study. Dr. D. Shah reported receiving grant from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority outside of this work. No other disclosures were reported. All other coauthors reported no conflict of interests. Ethical Approval: This study was approved by institutional review boards at each institution.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a worldwide pandemic with recurrences. Therefore, finding a vaccine for this virus became a priority for the scientific community. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein has been described as the keystone for viral entry into cells and effective immune protection against SARS-CoV-2 is elicited by this protein. Consequently, many commercialized vaccines focus on the spike protein and require the use of an optimal adjuvant during vaccination. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) has demonstrated a powerful enhancement of acquired immunity against many pathogens when delivered in a sustained and local manner. In this context, we developed an encapsulated cell-based technology consisting of a biocompatible, semipermeable capsule for secretion of GM-CSF. In this study, we investigated whether murine GM-CSF (muGM-CSF) represents a suitable adjuvant for SARS-CoV-2 immunization, and which delivery strategy for muGM-CSF could be most beneficial. To test this, different groups of mice were immunized with intra-dermal (i.d.) electroporated spike DNA in the absence or presence of recombinant or secreted muGM-CSF. Results demonstrated that adjuvanting a spike DNA vaccine with secreted muGM-CSF resulted in enhancement of specific cellular and humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2. Our data also highlighted the importance of delivery strategies to the induction of cellular and humoral-mediated responses.

Background Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL); few treatments have demonstrated clinically meaningful HRQoL benefit. KEYNOTE-040 evaluated pembrolizumab vs standard of care (SOC) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC whose disease recurred or progressed after platinum-containing regimen. Methods Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg or SOC (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab). Exploratory HRQoL analyses used European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 30 quality-of-life, EORTC 35-question quality-of-life head and neck cancer-specific module, and EuroQoL 5-dimensions questionnaires. Results The HRQoL population comprised 469 patients (pembrolizumab = 241, SOC = 228). HRQoL compliance for patients in the study at week 15 was 75.3% (116 of 154) for pembrolizumab and 74.6% (85 of 114) for SOC. The median time to deterioration in global health status (GHS) and QoL scores were 4.8 months with pembrolizumab and 2.8 months with SOC (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59 to 1.05). At week 15, GHS / QoL scores were stable for pembrolizumab (least squares mean [LSM] = 0.39, 95% CI = –3.00 to 3.78) but worsened for SOC (LSM = −5.86, 95% CI = −9.68 to −2.04); the LSM between-group difference was 6.25 points (95% CI = 1.32 to 11.18; nominal 2-sided P = .01). A greater difference in the LSM for GHS / QoL score occurred with pembrolizumab vs docetaxel (10.23, 95% CI = 3.15 to 17.30) compared with pembrolizumab vs methotrexate (6.21, 95% CI = −4.57 to 16.99) or pembrolizumab vs cetuximab (−1.44, 95% CI = −11.43 to 8.56). Pembrolizumab-treated patients had stable functioning and symptoms at week 15, with no notable differences from SOC. Conclusions GHS / QoL scores were stable with pembrolizumab but declined with SOC in patients at week 15, supporting the clinically meaningful benefit of pembrolizumab in recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC.

Background: For patients with resectable stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) neoadjuvant chemotherapy with three cycles of cisplatin and docetaxel followed by surgery has been shown to yield a 1-year event-free survival (EFS) rate of 48% and is an accepted standard of care. Neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors can result in high response rates in resectable NSCLC. Methods: Neoadjuvant treatment consisted of three cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m 2 and docetaxel 85 mg/m 2 q3w followed by two cycles of durvalumab 750 mg q2w. Adjuvant durvalumab was continued for 1 year after surgery. The primary endpoint was 1-year EFS. The hypothesis for statistical considerations was an improvement of 1-year EFS from 48% to 65%. This trial is registered with ClinicialTrials.gov, NCT02572843. Findings: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled, 67 were included in the full analysis set. Radiographic response rate was 43·3% (95%CI: 31·2-56·0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (complete remission (CR): 2·9%, partial remission (PR): 40·3%, stable disease (SD): 44·8%) and 58·1% (95%CI: 44·8-70·5) after additional neoadjuvant immunotherapy (CR: 6·5%, PR: 51·6%, SD: 25·8%). Fifty-five patients were resected, of which 34 (61·8%) achieved a major pathological response (MPR; ≤10% viable tumour cells), and 10 (18·2%) amongst them a complete pathological response. Postoperative nodal down-staging (ypN0-1) was observed in 37 patients (67·3%). Fifty-one (92·7%) patients had an R0 resection. There was no significant effect of pre-treatment PD-L1 expression on MPR or nodal down-staging. In the entire study population, the 1-year EFS rate was 73·4% (90%CI: 62·7-81·5). Median EFS and overall survival were not reached after 28 months of median follow-up. Fifty-nine (88·1%) patients had an adverse event (AE) grade ≥3 including two fatal AEs that were not assessed to be treatment-related. Interpretation: This is thus far the largest report on perioperative PD-(L)1 inhibition in patients with resectable stage IIIA(N2) NSCLC. The addition of perioperative durvalumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is safe and exceeds historical data of chemotherapy alone with a high MPR and an encouraging 1-year EFS rate of 73·4%. Trial Registration: This trial is registered with ClinicialTrials.gov, NCT02572843. Funding Statement: The study was supported by research agreements with the following institutions: Swiss State Secretary for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI), Swiss Cancer Research Foundation (SCS) and Swiss Cancer League (SCL). Research funding for translational research projects was granted by Gateway for Cancer Research and Rising Tide Foundation. AstraZeneca provided drug and financial support. Declaration of Interests: SIR: Honoraria for advisory boards and consulting (all paid to the institution) from Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda. Research funding from AbbVie, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Merck. Support for travel and accommodations from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, MSD, Roche, Takeda. Member of the Federal Drug Commission of the Federal Office of Public Health. AZ: Honoraria for advisory boards and consulting (all paid to the institution) from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Hoffmann–La Roche, NBE Therapeutics, Secarna, ACM Pharma and Hookipa. Non-commercial research agreements with Hoffmann–La Roche, NBE Therapeutics, Secarna, ACM Pharma, Hookipa, and BeyondSpring. EIE: None SSP: Honoraria for advisory boards and consulting from Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche. DB: None AB: None MF: Research grants from Bristol-Myers-Squibb and Astra Zeneca (paid to the institution). Honoraria for advisory boards from Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Roche, Boehringer-Ingelheim and MSD. MJ: Research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche and Merck. DL: None HG: None LAM: Honoraria for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Takeda, Roche and MSD. Support for travel and accommodations from AstraZeneca and Roche. CB: Honoraria for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Janssen-Cilag and Boehringer-Ingelheim. Support for travel and accommodations from AstraZeneca and Takeda. WW: Honoraria for advisory boards and consulting from Astra Zeneca SP: Personal fees from Abbvie, grants and personal fees from Amgen, grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Biocartis, grants and personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, grants and personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, grants and personal fees from Clovis, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees from Debiopharm, personal fees from Eli Lilly, grants and personal fees from F. Hoffman - La Roche, personal fees from Foundations Medicine, grants and personal fees from Illumina, personal fees from Janssen, grants and personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pharma Mar, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Regeneron, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Seattle Genetics, personal fees from Takeda, grants and personal fees from Merck Sharp and Dohme, personal fees from Merck Serono, personal fees from Merrimack. MM: Honoraria for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, MSD, Roche and Takeda. Research grant (to the institution) from AstraZeneca. RC: Honoraria for advisory boards (all paid to the institution) from AstraZeneca, Astellas, MSD, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, Pfizer, Merck Serono, Ipsen and Bayer. AFO: None WDJ: None CW: None NM: None PF: Honoraria for advisory from Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Boehringer-Ingelheim and BristolMyers Squibb. MB: None PB: None GG: None CR: None MG: Honoraria for advisory boards and consulting (all paid to the institution) from Astra-Zeneca. MP: Honoraria for advisory boards from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BristolMyers-Squibb, Eisai, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda and Merck. Speakers fee from Janssen-Cilag. Support for travel and accommodations from AstraZeneca, BoehringerIngelheim, Bristol-Myers-Squibb and Vifor. Ethics Approval Statement: The trial was done in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the ethics committee of each participating site. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Patients with cancer experience a higher burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection, disease severity, complications, and mortality, than the general population. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines are highly effective in the general population; however, few data are available on their efficacy in patients with cancer. Using a prospective cohort, we assessed the seroconversion rates and anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody titers following the first and second dose of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with cancer in US and Europe from January to April 2021. Among 131 patients, most (94%) achieved seroconversion after receipt of two vaccine doses. Seroconversion rates and antibody titers in patients with hematological malignancy were significantly lower than those with solid tumors. None of the patients with history of anti-CD-20 antibody in the 6 months before vaccination developed antibody response. Antibody titers were highest for clinical surveillance or endocrine therapy groups and lowest for cytotoxic chemotherapy or monoclonal antibody groups.

e13606 Background: SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have changed the course of the current global pandemic. Cancer patients were identified as highrisk of adverse infection outcomes. We have previously characterised the serological response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in 220 cancer patients treated at our institution. In addition these patients were given the possibility to report their symptoms (patient-reported outcomes, PROs) weekly using a digital platform (ePROs). We sought to determine if, in cancer patients, the prospectively recorded post-vaccination ePROs could predict the serological response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Methods: We used a pre-existing digital platform that allows monitoring of PROs using weekly questionnaires sent to patients and available on their desktop computers, tablets or smartphones. Serial serologies were performed at 28, 50 and 115 days after vaccination. Results: We observed that at day 50 after the first vaccination dose, coinciding with three weeks after the second dose, patients could be divided into two groups according to their serological response (low – below 1500 U/ml and high – above or equal 1500 U/ml). A peak in symptom burden could be observed after the second dose, as previously described. Omitting ePRO features decreased prediction performance of all models, whereas omitting baseline symptom scores had inconsistent effects. Among all models and feature constructions, the top performance metrics were given by the nearest centroid model7 with baseline symptoms omitted and 20 features chosen with the aforementioned procedure. The model achieved an accuracy of 0.704, an F1-score of 0.759 and an MCC of 0.398. Conclusions: we were able to identify the patients who achieved higher antibody levels against SARS-COV-2 based on the symptom burden reported through ePROs. This represents the first model showing that symptoms, assessed through ePRO can be predictive of response to vaccines. Our results could also be useful information for patients, as they could assuage their fears about adverse -effects, through the knowledge that toxicity could predict better protection against SARS-COV-2. The same toxicity-based prediction of efficacy has been identified with immunotherapy in cancer and is now a routine part of clinical discussions with patients.

Recently an increasing number of new adenovirus types associated with type-dependent pathogenicity have been identified. However, identification of these clinical isolates represents the very first step to characterize novel pathogens. For deeper analyses, these adenoviruses need to be further characterized in basic virology experiments or they could be applied in translational research. To achieve this goal, it is essential to get genetic access and to enable genetic modification of these novel adenovirus genomes (deletion, insertion, and mutation). Here we demonstrate a high-throughput approach to get genetic access to new adenoviruses via homologous recombination. We first defined the cloning conditions regarding homology arm-length and input adenoviral genome amounts. Then we cloned four naturally occurring adenoviruses (Ad70, Ad73, Ad74, and Ad75) into easy-to-manipulate plasmids and genetically modified them by reporter gene insertion. Three recombinant adenoviruses (Ad70, Ad73, and Ad74) containing a reporter cassette were successfully reconstituted. These novel reporter-labeled adenoviruses were further characterized using the inserted luciferase reporter with respect to receptor usage, presence of anti-adenovirus antibodies, and tropism in vitro. The identified receptor usage, the relatively low prevalence of anti-adenovirus antibodies, and the various cancer cell line transduction pattern are important features of these new pathogens providing essential information for their therapeutic application.

Oncolytic adenoviruses (Ads) are promising tools for cancer therapeutics. However, most Ad-based therapies utilize Ad type 5 (Ad5), which displays unsatisfying efficiency in clinical trials, partly due to the low expression levels of its primary coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR) on tumor cells. Since the efficacy of virotherapy strongly relies on efficient transduction of targeted tumor cells, initial screening of a broad range of viral agents to identify the most effective vehicles is essential. Using a novel Ad library consisting of numerous human Ads representing known Ad species, we evaluated the transduction efficiencies in four breast cancer (BC) cell lines. For each cell line over 20 Ad types were screened in a high-throughput manner based on reporter assays. Ad types featuring high transduction efficiencies were further investigated with respect to the percentage of transgene-positive cells and efficiencies of cellular entry in individual cell lines. Additionally, oncolytic assay was performed to test tumor cell lysis efficacy of selected Ad types. We found that all analyzed BC cell lines show low expression levels of CAR, while alternative receptors such as CD46, DSG-2, and integrins were also detected. We identified Ad3, Ad35, Ad37, and Ad52 as potential candidates for BC virotherapy.

TO THE EDITOR: Treatment of proteasome inhibitor (PI)–refractory multiple myeloma (MM) is challenging, with response rates of only 15% to 35% being achieved with next-generation drugs such as pomalidomide, carfilzomib, and daratumumab, alone or in combination.[1][1][⇓][2]-[3][3] The oral HIV

Objective Platinum-based chemotherapy plus the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) cetuximab is used to treat recurrent/metastatic (RM) head-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Recently, we defined Cluster3 gene-expression signature as a potential predictor of favorable progression-free survival (PFS) in cetuximab-treated RM-HNSCC patients and predictor of partial metabolic FDG-PET response in an afatinib window-of-opportunity trial. Another anti-EGFR-mAb (panitumumab) was used as the treatment agent in RM-HNSCC patients in the phase II PANI01trial. PANI01 tumor samples were analyzed using functional genomics to explore response predictors to anti-EGFR therapy. Materials and methods Whole-gene expression and real-time PCR analyses were applied to pre-treatment samples from 25 PANI01 patients. Three gene signatures (Cluster3 score, RAS onco-signature, microenvironment score) and seven selected miRNAs were separately analyzed for association with panitumumab efficacy. Results Cluster3 expression levels had a profile with a significant bimodal separation of samples (P = 3.08 E−13). Higher RAS activation, microenvironment score, and miRNA expression were associated with low-Cluster3 patients. The same biomarkers were separately associated with PFS. Patients with high-Cluster3 had significantly longer PFS than patients with low-Cluster3 (median PFS: 174 versus 51 days; log-rank P = 0.0021). ROC analysis demonstrated accuracy in predicting PFS (AUC = 0.877). Conclusions Despite differences in clinical settings and anti-EGFR inhibitors used for treatment, response prediction by the Cluster3 signature and selected miRNAs was essentially the same. Translation into a useful clinical assay requires validation in a broader setting.