Search

Background Anti-cancer drugs commonly adversely affect fertility and sexual function. Despite this, patients report a lack of counselling of these potential adverse effects. The aim was to determine Dutch oncologists' knowledge about the adverse effects of various cancer drugs on fertility and sexual function. Methods A cross-sectional survey was sent to members of the Dutch Society for Medical Oncology (n = 433). The survey questions included various cancer drugs' adverse effects on fertility, ovulation, spermatogenesis, and sexual function. Results One hundred and five of 392 oncologists responded (26.8%). Oncologists were more aware of the adverse effects on fertility compared to sexual function. Drugs that were mostly believed to negatively affect fertility were cisplatin (n = 81, 80.2%), epirubicin (n = 78, 78.0%) and cyclophosphamide (n = 80, 77.7%). Regarding sexual function, most mentioned drugs were tamoxifen (n = 67, 65.7%), GnRH-agonists (n = 64, 63.4%) and cisplatin (n = 58, 57.4%). Oncologists with expertise in urology possessed more awareness regarding sexuality-related adverse effects (cisplatin p = 0.038, etoposide p = 0.025, ifosfamide p = 0.06, vinblastine p = 0.000). Conclusion Results revealed that oncologists have different beliefs about possible sexual and fertility-related adverse effects concerning medication resources and literature. Based on our results, oncologists do not possess sufficient knowledge to inform patients about sexual and fertility-related adverse effects.

Background: Fifty to eighty percent of patients suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD) experience a form of sexual dysfunction (SD), even after renal transplantation. Despite this, inquiring about SD is often not included in the daily practice of renal care providers. Objectives: This paper explores the perspectives of renal social workers regarding sexual care for patients and evaluates their practice,attitude towards responsibility and knowledge of SD. Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a 41-item online survey. Participants: Seventy-nine members of the Dutch Federation of Social Workers Nephrology. Results: It was revealed that 60% of respondents discussed SD with a fifth of their patients. Frequency of discussion was associated with experience (p¼0.049), knowledge (p¼0.001), supplementary education (p¼0.006), and the availability of protocols on sexual care (p¼0.007).Main barriers towards discussing SD consisted of ‘culture and religion’ (51.9%), ‘language and ethnicity’ (49.4%), and ‘presence of a third person’ (45.6%). Sufficient knowledge of SD was present in 28% of respondents. The responsibility for discussion was 96% nephrologists and 81% social workers. Conclusion: This study provides evidence that a part of Dutch nephrology social workers do not provide sexual care regularly, due to insufficient experience and sexual knowledge, absence of privacy and protocols and barriers based on cultural diversity. According to the respondents the responsibility for this aspect of care should be multidisciplinary. Recommendations include a need for further education on the topic, private opportunities to discuss SD and multidisciplinary guidelines on sexual care

PurposeThis study evaluated current fertility care forCKD patients by assessing the perspectives of nephrolo-gists and nurses in the dialysis department.MethodsTwo different surveys were distributed forthis cross-sectional study among Dutch nephrologists(N=312) and dialysis nurses (N=1211).ResultsResponse rates were 50.9% (nephrologists) and45.4% (nurses). Guidelines on fertility care were presentin the departments of 9.0% of the nephrologists and 15.6%of the nurses. 61.7% of the nephrologists and 23.6% ofthe nurses informed ≥50% of their patients on potentialchanges in fertility due to a decline in renal function.Fertility subjects discussed by nephrologists included “wishto have children” (91.2%), “risk of pregnancy for patients’health” (85.8%), and “inheritance of the disease” (81.4%).Barriers withholding nurses from discussing FD werebased on “the age of the patient” (62.6%), “insufficienttraining” (55.2%), and “language and ethnicity” (51.6%).29.2% of the nurses felt competent in discussing fertility,8.3% had sufficient knowledge about fertility, and 75.7%needed to expand their knowledge. More knowledge andcompetence were associated with providing fertility healthcare (p< 0.01).ConclusionsIn most nephrology departments, the guide-lines to appoint which care provider should provide fertil-ity care to CKD patients are absent. Fertility counselingis routinely provided by most nephrologists, nurses oftenskip this part of care mainly due to insufficiencies in self-imposed competence and knowledge and barriers based oncultural diversity. The outcomes identified a need for fer-tility guidelines in the nephrology department and trainingand education for nurses on providing fertility care.CC BY 4.0https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Being confronted with cancer is a life-changing event, with major impact to well-being, quality of life and relationships. Cancer treatments and outcomes have improved, but possess the potential to impair reproductive and sexual function. International guidelines highlight the importance of timely discussion of sexual function and fertility deterioration resulting from treatments. In spite of these developments, practice behaviour and attitudes of health professionals have been reported to vary.The first part of this thesis demonstrates barriers among oncology professionals in the Netherlands in discussing sexual function during daily practice. In general, consensus exists regarding responsibility for addressing sexual dysfunction. Despite, the implementation of discussing sexual function as a standard of care is not carried out structural.Part two describes practice routines concerning the counselling on impaired fertility and fertility preservation for cancer patients of reproductive age. Medical oncologists and oncology nurses both reported discussing the impact of treatment on fertility. However, it was not performed in all cases and depending on factors like educational level, experience, type of hospital, prognosis and chances of fertility recovery.Furthermore, testicular cancer patients were evaluated on specific items concerning the discussion, referral and process of semen cryopreservation. Long term reproductive concerns were identified among survivors.

Sexual health and fertility does not come naturally for men and women suffering chronic kidney disease (CKD); sexual dysfunction and fertility issues are common throughout all stages of disease, including dialysis and transplantation. These issues, alongside with other side-effects of CKD, affect patients social and relation life as well. Besides, their partners often fulfill an important and supportive role during intensive treatments or a lingering sickbed. As a result, the disease and the accompanying burdens affect also their partners’ well-being on several levels.Since CKD patients and their partners face multiple challenges in the area of sexuality, fertility, and relationships one could assume awareness about these difficulties exist among their care providers. Unfortunately, this thesis shows that renal care providers do not routinely discuss sexuality with their patients, underlying reasons varied between the different renal care providers. Whereas the results imply that providing an opportunity to discuss sexuality during is preferred by patients and their partners, especially after renal transplantations.As for fertility, most nephrologists include this subject in their consultation. However nurses of the nephrology department could also play an important role in addressing this part of renal care, however, insufficient knowledge is a retaining factor for them.