Search

Context Open end-of-life communication is especially important within the patient-family unit of care and can positively affect their medical, psychological, and relational outcomes. Nevertheless, end-of-life discussions are often perceived as difficult and avoided. Objectives To develop and validate the Difficulties in End-of-Life Discussions - Family Inventory (DEOLD-FI) to allow a systematic assessment of reasons why people shy away from end-of-life discussions. Methods Patients with advanced cancer were recruited and completed the DEOLD-FI and measures of avoidance of cancer communication, quality of life and distress, and the experienced difficulty as well as the occurrence of end-of-life discussions. Standard item analyses and an exploratory factor analysis were conducted. Construct validity was analysed through associations between the DEOLD-FI and the aforementioned measures. Results Questionnaires were obtained from 112 participants (53% response rate; male 54%, mean age 64.9 years [range 33–94]). In the final 23-item version two factors were extracted: ‘emotional burden due to end-of-life discussions’ (α = 0.90) and “negative attitudes towards end-of-life discussions” (α = 0.91) explaining 69% of the variance (total scale α = 0.93). Construct validity was supported by its significant correlations with the reported difficulty in end-of-life discussions (r = 0.42) and avoidance of cancer communication (r = 0.40 to r = 0.46) and insignificant correlations with quality of life (r = -0.11), distress (r = 0.16), and physical well-being (r = 0.02). Those who had already engaged in end-of-life discussions showed significantly fewer communication barriers. Conclusion Results provide evidence that the DEOLD-FI is a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of difficulties in end-of-life discussions. Benefits for clinical practice and research are discussed.

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund und Ziel Frühzeitige Gespräche über das Lebensende können zu einer personenzentrierten Versorgung am Lebensende beitragen. Allerdings finden derartige Gespräche oft nicht oder zu spät statt. Im Rahmen einer qualitativen Pilotforschung soll ein Einblick in die Voraussetzungen für eine Gesprächsinitiierung, Schwierigkeiten und Nutzen aus Sicht gesunder Erwachsener ermöglicht werden. Die Ergebnisse können in der psychosomatischen Grundversorgung Berücksichtigung finden, sodass die Kommunikation über das Lebensende bei erkrankten, sowie gesunden älteren Personen frühzeitig initiiert und gefördert werden kann. Methoden Die Interviews entstammen einer experimentellen Untersuchung zum Umgang mit Gesprächen über das Lebensende bei gesunden Probanden des höheren Erwachsenenalters, die über Aushänge rekrutiert wurden. Sechs Transkripte von 2 männlichen und 4 weiblichen Teilnehmerinnen (65–78 Jahre) wurden mithilfe der Thematischen Analyse nach Braun & Clarke ausgewertet. Ergebnisse Voraussetzungen für eine Gesprächsinitiierung ließen sich in Überzeugungen und Einstellungen, intrinsische Motivation, Erfahrung, familiäre Kommunikation und praktische Umsetzung einteilen. Schwierigkeiten zeigten sich in den Bereichen kognitive Barrieren, praktische Umsetzung, emotionale Barrieren, Beziehungsebene, und Umgebungsbedingungen. Die Befragten sahen den Nutzen auf der Beziehungsebene, in den Bereichen Organisatorisches und Wertvorstellungen, sowie den kognitiven und emotionalen Nutzen. Diskussion Die Ergebnisse knüpfen an die bisherige Forschung insofern an, dass es aus Sicht älterer Gesunder einen zu späten Zeitpunkt für familiäre Gespräche über das Lebensende gibt. Es wird deutlich, dass bestimmte Barrieren frühzeitige Kommunikation verhindern können. Die gewonnenen Erkenntnisse liefern Anstöße für weitere Forschung und können zur Entwicklung von Interventionen zur Erhöhung der Bereitschaft, rechtzeitig das Thema Lebensendeplanung anzusprechen, verwendet werden. Schlussfolgerung Frühzeitige Gespräche über das Lebensende sollten im Sinne der präventiven Gesundheitsvorsorge niedrigschwellig angeboten werden. Behandelnde in der psychosomatischen Grundversorgung können Gesprächsbedarf erkennen, Informationen vermitteln, Barrieren abbauen und strukturierte Gesprächsbegleitung anbieten.

Hintergrund: Tod und Sterben sind in Psychotherapien häufig relevante Themen, besonders, wenn Menschen mit lebensbedrohlichen Erkrankungen in Behandlung kommen. Die Kommunikation über das Lebensende in der Therapie und im Alltag ist häufig mit Angst und Überforderung verknüpft. Dabei kann eine gelungene Kommunikation bedeuten, dass die Lebensqualität von Betroffenen und Angehörigen steigt, genau wie ihre Verbundenheit. Bisher existieren keine wissenschaftlich evaluierten Programme zur Anbahnung von Gesprächen über das Lebensende. Ein solches wurde im Rahmen der “Hand-in-Hand” Studie als Zugang für eine medizinische Vorausplanung entwickelt. Fallbericht: Zwei Krebsbetroffene, die im Rahmen einer randomisierten kontrollierten Studie an der “Hand-in-Hand” Intervention teilnahmen, werden vorgestellt. Die Interventionsbausteine aus Würde-Therapie, Wissensvermittlung und kognitiver Therapie werden beschrieben und ihre Wirkung qualitativ und quantitativ bewertet. Dabei zeigt sich eine hohe Zufriedenheit bezüglich der Intervention. Die Intervention kann die Kommunikation zwischen Betroffenen und Angehörigen verbessern, wenn auch in unterschiedlich starkem Ausmaß. Schlussfolgerung: Es ist wichtig, Menschen im Rahmen der psychotherapeutischen Versorgung nach lebensbedrohlichen Erkrankungen in ihrem Umfeld zu befragen. PsychotherapeutInnen besitzen dabei bereits Kompetenzen, mit denen sie Gespräche über das Lebensende fördern können. Der gezielte Einsatz dieser Kompetenzen im Rahmen der “Hand-in-Hand” Intervention hat in den beschriebenen Einzelfällen zu einer Veränderung in der Kommunikation geführt.

Background: Engaging in end-of-life care considerations is beneficial when the time is right. The purpose of this study is to provide a valid instrument to assess peoples readiness for end-of-life conversations before they are initiated.Materials and Methods: A community sample was recruited in study one for exploratory factor analysis of a 13-item questionnaire. In study two, psychometric properties were analyzed with structural equation modeling in a population affected by cancer. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed with questionnaires measuring distress, depression, anxiety, fear of progression, and distress of death and dying.Results: In study one (N = 349) exploratory factor analysis resulted in three subscales readiness (α = 0.84), communication (α = 0.76), and values (α = 0.56) with a possible common factor (α = 0.84) for a community sample. In study two (N = 84) the three-factor solution with 13 items was not supported for cancer patients. Factor structure was adapted to 12 items with one common factor readiness (α = 0.87). Model fit was good: χ2(50) = 59.18, p>0.05 (Satorra-Bentler-correction = 1.27), with χ2/df = 1.184, rRMSEA = 0.053 (90%-CI[0.000;0.100]), and rSRMR = 0.072. Convergent validity was supported by moderate correlations to trait gratitude, ratings of readiness to provide a living will or talk with family about the end of life. Divergent validity was supported by no or small correlation with distress, depression, general and death anxiety and fear of progression, respectively.Conclusions: Results support usage of the REOLC Scale in different settings with adapted factor structure. The questionnaire is interpreted as valid and reliable instrument to assess objective readiness for end-of-life conversations.

Early conversations about the end of life can contribute to patient-centered care at the end of life. Too often, however, these conversations do not take place or if they do, they are too late. The aim of this qualitative research was to identify the prerequisites, difficulties and usefulness of such conversations from the point of view of healthy older adults. The findings might be of use in primary health care to provide early and open end-of-life discussions.The interviews stem from an experimental study concerning the readiness of end-of-life conversations with healthy adults. Six transcripts (2 male and 4 female participants, 65-78 years) were evaluated by using the thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke.Conditions for the initiation of conversations were thematically separated into beliefs and attitudes, intrinsic motivation, experience, family communication and practical realization. Difficulties were found in the areas of cognitive barriers, practical realization, emotional barriers, relational factors and environmental conditions. Participants saw the usefulness of such conversations in the areas of relationship quality, organizational profit, values, as well as cognitive and emotional areas.The results are in agreement with past research. From the perspective of older healthy people, family conversations about the end of life can be "too late". However, it also appears that there are specific barriers to early discussions. The findings on helpful conditions and barriers can be used for the development of interventions to increase readiness for such discussions.Early conversations about the end of life should be offered in the sense of preventive care in a low-threshold way. Providers of primary health care can identify a "need to talk", reduce communication barriers and encourage confrontation with one's own mortality. Adequate information should be provided if necessary, and a structured communication approach should be employed.Frühzeitige Gespräche über das Lebensende können zu einer personenzentrierten Versorgung am Lebensende beitragen. Allerdings finden derartige Gespräche oft nicht oder zu spät statt. Im Rahmen einer qualitativen Pilotforschung soll ein Einblick in die Voraussetzungen für eine Gesprächsinitiierung, Schwierigkeiten und Nutzen aus Sicht gesunder Erwachsener ermöglicht werden. Die Ergebnisse können in der psychosomatischen Grundversorgung Berücksichtigung finden, sodass die Kommunikation über das Lebensende bei erkrankten, sowie gesunden älteren Personen frühzeitig initiiert und gefördert werden kann.Die Interviews entstammen einer experimentellen Untersuchung zum Umgang mit Gesprächen über das Lebensende bei gesunden Probanden des höheren Erwachsenenalters, die über Aushänge rekrutiert wurden. Sechs Transkripte von 2 männlichen und 4 weiblichen Teilnehmerinnen (65–78 Jahre) wurden mithilfe der Thematischen Analyse nach BraunClarke ausgewertet.Voraussetzungen für eine Gesprächsinitiierung ließen sich in Überzeugungen und Einstellungen, intrinsische Motivation, Erfahrung, familiäre Kommunikation und praktische Umsetzung einteilen. Schwierigkeiten zeigten sich in den Bereichen kognitive Barrieren, praktische Umsetzung, emotionale Barrieren, Beziehungsebene, und Umgebungsbedingungen. Die Befragten sahen den Nutzen auf der Beziehungsebene, in den Bereichen Organisatorisches und Wertvorstellungen, sowie den kognitiven und emotionalen Nutzen.Die Ergebnisse knüpfen an die bisherige Forschung insofern an, dass es aus Sicht älterer Gesunder einen zu späten Zeitpunkt für familiäre Gespräche über das Lebensende gibt. Es wird deutlich, dass bestimmte Barrieren frühzeitige Kommunikation verhindern können. Die gewonnenen Erkenntnisse liefern Anstöße für weitere Forschung und können zur Entwicklung von Interventionen zur Erhöhung der Bereitschaft, rechtzeitig das Thema Lebensendeplanung anzusprechen, verwendet werden.Frühzeitige Gespräche über das Lebensende sollten im Sinne der präventiven Gesundheitsvorsorge niedrigschwellig angeboten werden. Behandelnde in der psychosomatischen Grundversorgung können Gesprächsbedarf erkennen, Informationen vermitteln, Barrieren abbauen und strukturierte Gesprächsbegleitung anbieten.

Introduction: Talking about death and dying is evoking discomfort in many persons, resulting in avoidance of this topic. However, end-of-life discussions can alleviate distress and uncertainties in both old and young adults, but only a minority uses this option in palliative care. Even in healthy populations, talking about death is often seen as alleviative and worthwhile, but rarely initiated. Objective: To investigate different psychological interventions (a) encouraging the readiness for end-of-life discussions and (b) changing death attitudes in healthy adults of different ages. Methods: 168 participants were randomized to four different interventions (IG1: value-based intervention with end-of-life perspective, IG2: motivation-based intervention with end-of-life perspective, IG3: combination of IG1 and IG2, CG: control group). Primary outcome was the readiness to engage in end-of-life topics. Secondary outcomes were fear of death, fear of dying and death acceptance. Assessments took place before, directly after the intervention and at 2 weeks of follow up. Results: IG2 and IG3 reported significantly more changes in the readiness to engage in end-of-life discussions than the CG (F[5.61, 307] = 4.83, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.081) directly after the intervention. The effect of IG3 remained stable at the follow-up. There were no significant effects of the interventions on end-of-life fears or death acceptance. Acceptability of the interventions was very high. Conclusions: Short interventions can be useful to encourage end-of-life discussions and could be integrated in health care programs. The efficacy and effectiveness of these short interventions in palliative patients are currently examined.

BackgroundCommunication about the end of life is especially important in the family context, as patients and their families are considered as the care unit in palliative care. Open end-of-life communication can positively affect medical, psychological and relational outcomes during the dying process for patient and family. Regardless of the benefits of end-of-life conversations, many patients and their family caregivers speak little about relevant end-of-life issues.AimTo identify barriers that hinder or influence the discussion of end-of-life issues in the family context.DesignA systematic mixed-method review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines.Data sourcesA systematic search of PsycInfo, CINAHL, PubMed and Web of Science was conducted and extended with a hand search. Peer-reviewed primary studies reporting on the barriers to or difficulties in end-of-life conversations experienced by terminally ill patients and/or family caregivers were included in this review.Results18 qualitative and two quantitative studies met the inclusion criteria. The experiences of n=205 patients and n=738 family caregivers were analysed qualitatively; n=293 patients and n=236 caregivers were surveyed in the questionnaire studies. Five overarching categories emerged from the extracted data: emotional, cognitive, communicative, relational and external processes can hinder end-of-life communication within the family. The most frequently reported barriers are emotional and cognitive processes such as protective buffering or belief in positive thinking.ConclusionsResearch on end-of-life communication barriers in the family context is scarce. Further research should enhance the development of appropriate assessment tools and interventions to support families with the challenges experienced regarding end-of-life conversations.

Current reviews revealed that there is a lack of effective programs and valuable effectiveness studies related to prevention of aggressive behavior and fostering of social competence in early adolescents participating in organized team sports (e.g., ball sports, such as soccer). Using a randomized controlled design, the present pilot study presents first results regarding the effectiveness of the preventive intervention program “Fairplayer.Sport” that was implemented with preadolescent soccer players (N = 145 preadolescents; aged 9–14 years; mean = 12.2 years) in organized team sport (13 soccer teams). Results revealed a reduction of aggressive behavior in the intervention groups compared to waiting‐control groups (small effect size). This effect remained stable 3 months after program implementation. Implications for planning and implementing preventive intervention programs are discussed.

Background Implementation of advance care planning (ACP) is proceeding in the western world and often recognised as a sufficient approach to ensure patients’ wishes for end of life (EoL) care. There is evidence that patient related outcomes are improved. However, information about the impact of ACP on quality of life (QoL) in palliative cancer patients is missing. Methods This randomised controlled trial investigates the efficacy and effectiveness of a collaborative ACP (cACP) intervention in palliative cancer patients and their care givers by comparing three groups: 1. cACP-Intervention; 2. Supportive intervention 3. Treatment as usual. The cACP-intervention consists of four sessions (two with the patient alone, one with the care giver alone, one together) that address potential barriers to discuss end of life issues (e.g. negative expectations concerning EoL issues and ACP) and two regular ACP sessions. Primary endpoint is the patient health-related QoL (FACIT-PAL). Secondary endpoints are general QoL; distress; acceptance; depressiveness; evaluation of the intervention; care-givers: heath-related and general QoL. Patients’ QoL is evaluated every second month for one year. In the event of the patients death, care-givers are asked to answer questions about concordance of advance care planning with actual care and the patients quality of dying. Results Until 11/18, 75 patients have been randomized, 13 patients finished the intervention, 21 patients died, denial rate is at approx. 55%. Conclusion This study tries to implement ACP in a palliative cancer setting in Germany. The efficacy and effectiveness of a novel collaborative ACP intervention are evaluated.

Objective Even if significantly distressed, many patients with cancer do not seek psychological help. There is growing evidence that attitudes are central barriers for help-seeking, and instruments to assess cancer patients' attitudes towards help-seeking are urgently needed. This study aimed to evaluate the German Attitudes towards Seeking Help after Cancer Scale (ASHCa-G) and investigated the relationship between patients' attitudes and psychological care utilisation. Methods The ASHCa-G was presented to 270 patients with cancer (age 63.0 ± 12.7 years, 44.8% women). Item analyses, principal component analysis and associations with age, social support, help-seeking intention and psychological care utilisation were calculated. A hierarchical logistic regression was performed to ascertain the leading role of attitudes in explaining psychological care utilisation. Results Principal component analysis supported a two-component solution, which showed good internal consistency for the positive attitudes (α = 0.80) and negative attitudes (α = 0.75) subscales. The associations with age, distress and help-seeking intention confirmed the validity of the ASHCa-G. Positive attitudes explained most variance of cancer patients' current psychological care utilisation. Conclusion The ASHCa-G seems to be a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing attitudes towards seeking psychological help among patients with cancer. Clinical practice might profit from identifying attitudinal barriers that hinder patients with cancer from seeking psychological help.

To provide an update on recent studies about psychological interventions in palliative (mainly cancer) care with a focus on physical, psychological, spiritual, and social aspects.Some promising psychological interventions for physical challenges, such as fatigue, pain, dyspnea, and insomnia do exist, but further research is needed. Regarding psychological aspects, current reviews showed small to large effects in the reduction of depression and anxiety symptoms through cognitive behavioral-based interventions, mindfulness-based interventions, and meaning-based interventions. Meaning-based or dignity-based approaches were also used for targeting spiritual aspects or existential distress. Social aspects that play a crucial role in palliative care are addressed by social support interventions, end-of-life discussions, and advanced careplanning. All of these psychological interventions must meet the specific requirements of palliative care, namely abbreviated session time and flexibility concerning locality of interventions, a minimized questionnaire burden and a high attrition rate caused by patients' poor physical conditions or deaths.There is substantial research on psychological interventions in palliative care that shows promising results, but sample sizes were often small. Due to its high relevance for this growing patient group, there is a strong need for ongoing/further research.