1. Effects of stent postdilatation during primary PCI for STEMI: Insights from coronary physiology and optical coherence tomography
- Author
-
Gerald J. Clesham, Rajesh Aggarwal, Rohan Jagathesan, Kare H. Tang, Valeria Marco, Reto Gamma, Andreas S Kalogeropoulos, Paul A. Kelly, Grigoris V. Karamasis, John R. Davies, Nicholas M Robinson, Thomas R. Keeble, Jeremy Sayer, Francesco Prati, and Alamgir Kabir
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Fractional flow reserve ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Coronary Angiography ,Microvascular injury ,03 medical and health sciences ,Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ,0302 clinical medicine ,Optical coherence tomography ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,cardiovascular diseases ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Myocardial infarction ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Microcirculation ,Coronary flow reserve ,Stent ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Coronary Vessels ,Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial ,Treatment Outcome ,Conventional PCI ,Cardiology ,ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction ,Stents ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Coronary physiology ,business ,Tomography, Optical Coherence - Abstract
Objectives:\ud \ud This study aimed to assess the impact of stent optimization by NC‐balloon postdilatation (PD) during primary‐PCI for STEMI with the use of coronary physiology and intracoronary imaging.\ud \ud Methods:\ud \ud This was a prospective observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02788396). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and physiological measurements were performed immediately before and after PD with the operators blinded to all measurements. The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), coronary flow reserve (CFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) were measured. OCT analysis was performed for assessment of stent expansion, malapposition, in‐stent plaque‐thrombus prolapse (PTP) and stent‐edge dissections (SED). The change in IMR before and after PD as a measure of microvascular injury was the primary objective of the study.\ud \ud Results:\ud \ud Thirty‐two STEMI patients undergoing primary‐PCI had physiological measurements before and after PD. All patients received second‐generation DES (diameter 3.1 ± 0.5 mm, length 29.9 ± 10.7 mm) and postdilatation with NC‐balloons (diameter 3.6 ± 0.6 mm, inflation pressure 19.3 ± 2.0 atm). IMR (44.9 ± 25.6 vs. 48.8 ± 34.2, p = 0.26) and CFR (1.60 ± 0.89 vs. 1.58 ± 0.71, p = 0.87) did not change, while FFR increased after PD (0.91 ± 0.08 vs. 0.93 ± 0.06, p = 0.037). At an individual patient level, IMR increased in half of the cases. PD improved significantly absolute and relative stent expansion, reduced malapposition, and increased PTP. There was no difference in clinically relevant SED.\ud \ud Conclusion:\ud \ud In this exploratory, hypothesis‐generating study, postdilatation during primary‐PCI for STEMI improved stent expansion, apposition and post‐PCI FFR, without a significant effect on coronary microcirculation overall. Nevertheless, IMR increased in a group of patients and larger studies are warranted to explore predictors of microcirculatory response to postdilatation.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF