Search

What is this summary about? This is a summary of an article about part of a clinical study for the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine, also called the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The article was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in May 2021. This summary describes how the vaccine worked in participants 12- to 15-years old. The part of the study described in the article is ongoing and expected to finish March 2023. This means that the final results may be different from the results included in this summary. What happened in this study? The part of the study described in this summary included participants 12- to 15-years old who had no serious health issues. The BNT162b2 vaccine had already been studied in participants 16 years of age or older. In this part of the study, the researchers wanted to find out: How effective and safe the vaccine was in participants 12- to 15-years old. What the immune response to the vaccine and the vaccine safety were like in 12- to 15-year-olds compared with 16- to 25-year-olds. How well the vaccine prevented SARS-CoV-2 infections in participants who received the vaccine compared to those who did not. This is also called efficacy of the BNT162b2 vaccine Half of the participants in this study received 2 injections of the BNT162b2 vaccine and half received 2 injections of a placebo in a muscle of the upper arm. The placebo looked like the BNT162b2 vaccine but did not have any active vaccine in it. What were the results? BNT162b2 had a favorable safety profile. The most common reactions were pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. None of the participants had serious reactions to the vaccine. The 12- to 15-year-old participants' immune system responses to the BNT162b2 vaccine were as good as or stronger than the 16- to 25-year-old participants' immune responses. The participants who received the BNT162b2 vaccine were less likely to get COVID-19 compared with the participants who got the placebo. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04368728 ( ClinicalTrials.gov )

What is this summary about? This is a summary of an article about part of a clinical study for the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine, also called the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The article was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in September 2021. The part of the study described in the article began in July 2020 and is ongoing. This means that the final results may be different from the results included in this summary. What happened in this study? The participants in this study received 2 injections of either the BNT162b2 vaccine or a placebo, 21 days apart. The placebo looked like the BNT162b2 vaccine but had no active vaccine in it. None of the trial participants or study teams knew who received vaccine or placebo. What were the results? Most of the reactions to the injections were mild or moderate and lasted for a short period of time. The most common reactions were pain at the injection site, extreme tiredness (fatigue), and headache. These reactions usually happened in the first 7 days after receiving a vaccine dose. A small number of participants had severe reactions to the vaccine. Compared to participants who received the placebo, participants who received the BNT162b2 vaccine were much less likely to become ill if they were infected with the virus that causes COVID-19. The vaccine also had very good efficacy at preventing severe COVID-19. Participants in South Africa who received the BNT162b2 vaccine were less likely to become ill after infection with the beta variant of the virus compared to participants who received the placebo. The beta variant was very common in South Africa when the study was taking place. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04368728 ( ClinicalTrials.gov )

Introduction Individuals with an underlying malignancy have high risk of poor COVID-19 outcomes. In clinical trials, COVID-19 vaccines were safe and efficacious against infection, hospitalization, and death, but most trials excluded participants with cancer. We report results from participants with a history of past or active neoplasm (malignant or benign/unknown) and up to 6 months’ follow-up post-dose 2 from the placebo-controlled, observer-blinded trial of the 2-dose BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Patients and methods Between July 2020–January 2021, 46,429 participants aged ≥12 years were randomized at 152 sites in 6 countries. Healthy participants with pre-existing stable neoplasm could participate; those receiving immunosuppressive therapy were excluded. Data are reported for participants, aged ≥16 years for safety and ≥12 years for efficacy, who had any history of neoplasm at baseline (data cut-off: March 13, 2021). Adverse-event (AE) data are controlled for follow-up time before unblinding and reported as incidence rates (IRs) per 100 person-years follow-up. Results At baseline, 3813 participants had a history of neoplasm; most common malignancies were breast (n = 460), prostate (n = 362), and melanoma (n = 223). Four BNT162b2 and 71 placebo recipients developed COVID-19 from 7 days post-dose 2; vaccine efficacy was 94.4% (95% CI: 85.2, 98.5) after up to 6 months’ follow-up post-dose 2. This compares favorably with vaccine efficacy of 91.1% in the overall trial population after the same follow-up. AEs were reported at IRs of 95.4 (BNT162b2) and 48.3 (placebo) per 100 person-years. Most common AEs were reactogenicity events (injection-site pain, fatigue, pyrexia). Three BNT162b2 and 1 placebo recipients withdrew because of vaccine-related AEs. No vaccine-related deaths were reported. Conclusion In participants with past or active neoplasms, BNT162b2 vaccine has a similar efficacy and safety profile as in the overall trial population. These results can inform BNT162b2 use during the COVID-19 pandemic and future trials in participants with cancer. Clinical trial number: NCT04368728

Background BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine encoding a prefusion-stabilized, membrane-anchored severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) full-length spike protein. BNT162b2 is highly efficacious against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) and is currently approved, conditionally approved, or authorized for emergency use worldwide. At the time of initial authorization, data beyond 2 months after vaccination were unavailable. Methods In an ongoing, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, multinational, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned 44,165 participants 16 years of age or older and 2264 participants 12 to 15 years of age to receive two 30-μg doses, at 21 days apart, of BNT162b2 or placebo. The trial end points were vaccine efficacy against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and safety, which were both evaluated through 6 months after vaccination. Results BNT162b2 continued to be safe and have an acceptable adverse-event profile. Few participants had adverse events leading to withdrawal from the trial. Vaccine efficacy against Covid-19 was 91.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.0 to 93.2) through 6 months of follow-up among the participants without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection who could be evaluated. There was a gradual decline in vaccine efficacy. Vaccine efficacy of 86 to 100% was seen across countries and in populations with diverse ages, sexes, race or ethnic groups, and risk factors for Covid-19 among participants without evidence of previous infection with SARS-CoV-2. Vaccine efficacy against severe disease was 96.7% (95% CI, 80.3 to 99.9). In South Africa, where the SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern B.1.351 (or beta) was predominant, a vaccine efficacy of 100% (95% CI, 53.5 to 100) was observed. Conclusions Through 6 months of follow-up and despite a gradual decline in vaccine efficacy, BNT162b2 had a favorable safety profile and was highly efficacious in preventing Covid-19. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.)

Background Two phase 1/phase 2 studies assessed 2 formulations of investigational bivalent Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile vaccine (QS-21 adjuvanted toxoid and toxoid-alone) in healthy adults 50–85 years of age. Methods The QS-21 adjuvanted toxoid vaccine study randomized subjects 3:1 to 100 μg QS-21–containing C difficile vaccine or placebo administered in a shortened-month (Months 0, 1, 3) or day (Days 1, 8, 30) regimen. The toxoid-alone vaccine study randomized subjects 3:3:1 to receive 100 or 200 μg unadjuvanted C difficile vaccine formulation or placebo in Stages 1 and 2 (sentinel cohorts of different age groups), and 3:1 to receive the selected dose of unadjuvanted C difficile vaccine formulation or placebo in Stage 3 (Days 1, 8, 30). Safety was the primary outcome for both studies. Immunogenicity was determined by measuring serum toxin A– and B–specific neutralizing antibodies. Results In the day regimen, 10 reports across both studies of grade 3 injection site redness postdose 2 triggered predefined stopping rules. Local reactions in both studies were more common among vaccine versus placebo recipients. Injection site pain predominated and was generally mild in severity. Systemic events were infrequent and generally mild-to-moderate in severity. Adverse events were reported by 50.0%–75.0% and 16.7%–50.0% of subjects in the QS-21 and toxoid-alone studies, respectively. Immune responses peaked around Day 37 (shortened-month regimen) or between Day 15 and Month 2 (day regimen) and remained above baseline throughout follow-up. Conclusions Both formulations demonstrated robust immunogenicity. Both studies stopped early due to grade 3 injection site redness postdose 2 of the day regimen; neither formulation progressed to later stage development. Instead, an aluminum hydroxide-containing formulation of the vaccine candidate administered at 0, 1, and 6 months, which was safe and immunogenic in phase 1 and 2 studies, advanced to phase 3 studies.

The BNT162b2 bivalent BA.4/5 COVID-19 vaccine has been authorized to mitigate COVID-19 due to current Omicron and potentially future variants. New sublineages of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron continue to emerge and have acquired additional mutations, particularly in the spike protein, that may lead to improved viral fitness and immune evasion. The present study characterized neutralization activities against new Omicron sublineages BA.4.6, BA.2.75.2, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1 after a 4thdose (following three doses of BNT162b2) of either the original monovalent BNT162b2 or the bivalent BA.4/5 booster in individuals >55 years of age. For all participants, the 4thdose of monovalent BNT162b2 vaccine induced a 3.0×, 2.9×, 2.3×, 2.1×, 1.8×, and 1.5× geometric mean neutralizing titer fold rise (GMFR) against USA/WA1-2020 (a strain isolated in January 2020), BA.4/5, BA.4.6, BA.2.75.2, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1, respectively; the bivalent vaccine induced 5.8×, 13.0×, 11.1×, 6.7×, 8.7×, and 4.8× GMFRs. For individuals without SARS-CoV-2 infection history, BNT162b2 monovalent induced 4.4×, 3.0×, 2.5×, 2.0×, 1.5×, and 1.3× GMFRs, respectively; the bivalent vaccine induced 9.9×, 26.4×, 22.2×, 8.4×, 12.6×, and 4.7× GMFRs. These data suggest the bivalent BA.4/5 vaccine is more immunogenic than the original BNT162b2 monovalent vaccine against circulating Omicron sublineages, including BQ.1.1 that is becoming prevalent globally.

Active immunization with the BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) has been a critical mitigation tool against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic. In light of reports of waning protection occurring 6 months after the primary two-dose vaccine series, data are needed on the safety and efficacy of offering a third (booster) dose in persons 16 years of age or older.In this ongoing, placebo-controlled, randomized, phase 3 trial, we assigned participants who had received two 30-μg doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine at least 6 months earlier to be injected with a third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine or with placebo. We assessed vaccine safety and efficacy against Covid-19 starting 7 days after the third dose.A total of 5081 participants received a third BNT162b2 dose and 5044 received placebo. The median interval between dose 2 and dose 3 was 10.8 months in the vaccine group and 10.7 months in the placebo group; the median follow-up was 2.5 months. Local and systemic reactogenicity events from the third dose were generally of low grade. No new safety signals were identified, and no cases of myocarditis or pericarditis were reported. Among the participants without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection who could be evaluated, Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after dose 3 was observed in 6 participants in the vaccine group and in 123 participants in the placebo group, which corresponded to a relative vaccine efficacy of 95.3% (95% confidence interval, 89.5 to 98.3).A third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine administered a median of 10.8 months after the second dose provided 95.3% efficacy against Covid-19 as compared with two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine during a median follow-up of 2.5 months. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; C4591031 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04955626.).

In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)1, a pandemic. With rapidly accumulating numbers of cases and deaths reported globally2, a vaccine is urgently needed. Here we report the available safety, tolerability and immunogenicity data from an ongoing placebo-controlled, observer-blinded dose-escalation study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04368728) among 45 healthy adults (18–55 years of age), who were randomized to receive 2 doses—separated by 21 days—of 10 μg, 30 μg or 100 μg of BNT162b1. BNT162b1 is a lipid-nanoparticle-formulated, nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccine that encodes the trimerized receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2. Local reactions and systemic events were dose-dependent, generally mild to moderate, and transient. A second vaccination with 100 μg was not administered because of the increased reactogenicity and a lack of meaningfully increased immunogenicity after a single dose compared with the 30-μg dose. RBD-binding IgG concentrations and SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing titres in sera increased with dose level and after a second dose. Geometric mean neutralizing titres reached 1.9–4.6-fold that of a panel of COVID-19 convalescent human sera, which were obtained at least 14 days after a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR. These results support further evaluation of this mRNA vaccine candidate. In a dose-escalation study of the COVID-19 RNA vaccine BNT162b1 in 45 healthy adults, RBD-binding IgG concentrations and SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing titres in sera increased with dose level and after a second vaccine dose.

Background Safe, effective vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) are urgently needed in children younger than 12 years of age. Methods A phase 1, dose-finding study and an ongoing phase 2-3 randomized trial are being conducted to investigate the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine administered 21 days apart in children 6 months to 11 years of age. We present results for 5-to-11-year-old children. In the phase 2-3 trial, participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive two doses of either the BNT162b2 vaccine at the dose level identified during the open-label phase 1 study or placebo. Immune responses 1 month after the second dose of BNT162b2 were immunologically bridged to those in 16-to-25-year-olds from the pivotal trial of two 30-μg doses of BNT162b2. Vaccine efficacy against Covid-19 at 7 days or more after the second dose was assessed. Results During the phase 1 study, a total of 48 children 5 to 11 years of age received 10 μg, 20 μg, or 30 μg of the BNT162b2 vaccine (16 children at each dose level). On the basis of reactogenicity and immunogenicity, a dose level of 10 μg was selected for further study. In the phase 2-3 trial, a total of 2268 children were randomly assigned to receive the BNT162b2 vaccine (1517 children) or placebo (751 children). At data cutoff, the median follow-up was 2.3 months. In the 5-to-11-year-olds, as in other age groups, the BNT162b2 vaccine had a favorable safety profile. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were noted. One month after the second dose, the geometric mean ratio of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) neutralizing titers in 5-to-11-year-olds to those in 16-to-25-year-olds was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 1.18), a ratio meeting the prespecified immunogenicity success criterion (lower bound of two-sided 95% CI, >0.67; geometric mean ratio point estimate, ≥0.8). Covid-19 with onset 7 days or more after the second dose was reported in three recipients of the BNT162b2 vaccine and in 16 placebo recipients (vaccine efficacy, 90.7%; 95% CI, 67.7 to 98.3). Conclusions A Covid-19 vaccination regimen consisting of two 10-μg doses of BNT162b2 administered 21 days apart was found to be safe, immunogenic, and efficacious in children 5 to 11 years of age. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04816643.).

Immune Response to a Third Dose of BNT162b2 A third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine was administered to 23 volunteers 8 to 9 months after the second dose, and the immune response was assessed. Local r...

BackgroundBNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle-formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine encoding a prefusion-stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein. BNT162b2 is highly efficacious against COVID-19 and is currently authorized for emergency use or conditional approval worldwide. At the time of authorization, data beyond 2 months post-vaccination were unavailable.MethodsIn an ongoing, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, multinational, pivotal efficacy study, 44,165 ≥16-year-old participants and 2,264 12-15-year-old participants were randomized to receive 2 doses, 21 days apart, of 30 µg BNT162b2 or placebo. Study endpoints reported here are vaccine efficacy (VE) against laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and safety data, both up to 6 months post-vaccination.ResultsBNT162b2 continued to be safe and well tolerated. Few participants had adverse events leading to study withdrawal. VE against COVID-19 was 91% (95% CI 89.0-93.2) through up to 6 months of follow-up, among evaluable participants and irrespective of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. VE of 86%-100% was seen across countries and in populations with diverse characteristics of age, sex, race/ethnicity, and COVID-19 risk factors in participants without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. VE against severe disease was 97% (95% CI 80.3−99.9). In South Africa, where the SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern, B.1.351 (beta), was predominant, 100% (95% CI 53.5, 100.0) VE was observed.ConclusionWith up to 6 months of follow-up and despite a gradually declining trend in vaccine efficacy, BNT162b2 had a favorable safety profile and was highly efficacious in preventing COVID-19. (ClinicalTrials.govnumber,NCT04368728)

Background Clostridium difficile causes toxin-mediated nosocomial diarrhea and community-acquired infections; no preventive vaccine is licensed. In this phase 2 study, we explored safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity in older US adults of an investigational bivalent C. difficile vaccine that contains equal dosages of genetically and chemically detoxified toxins A and B. Methods Conducted from July 2015 through March 2017, 855 healthy adults aged 65–85 years from 15 US centers were randomized 3:3:1 to receive vaccine (100 or 200 μg) or placebo at 0, 1, and 6 months (month regimen) or 1, 8, and 30 days (day regimen). Serum toxin A– and B–specific neutralizing antibodies were measured. Participant-reported local reactions (LRs) and systemic events (SEs), adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, newly diagnosed chronic medical conditions, and immediate AEs were recorded. Results The 200-μg dose level elicited higher immune responses than the 100-µg dose level across regimens. Compared with the day regimen, the month regimen induced stronger and more persistent immune responses that remained elevated 12 months after dose 3. Responses peaked at month 7 (month regimen) and day 37 (day regimen). LRs (primarily injection site pain) were more frequent in vaccine recipients than controls; SE frequency was similar across groups. More related AEs were reported in the day regimen group than the month regimen group. Conclusions The C. difficile vaccine was safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic in healthy US adults aged 65–85 years. Immune responses were particularly robust in the 200-μg month regimen group. These results support continued vaccine development. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02561195., Prevention of Clostridium difficile infection is a significant unmet medical need. Here, a 3-dose series of an investigational C. difficile vaccine provided robust immune responses in older US adults. The vaccine was generally well tolerated, supporting its continued clinical development.

Background Until very recently, vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) had not been authorized for emergency use in persons younger than 16 years of age. Safe, effective vaccines are needed to protect this population, facilitate in-person learning and socialization, and contribute to herd immunity. Methods In this ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded trial, we randomly assigned participants in a 1:1 ratio to receive two injections, 21 days apart, of 30 μg of BNT162b2 or placebo. Noninferiority of the immune response to BNT162b2 in 12-to-15-year-old participants as compared with that in 16-to-25-year-old participants was an immunogenicity objective. Safety (reactogenicity and adverse events) and efficacy against confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19; onset, ≥7 days after dose 2) in the 12-to-15-year-old cohort were assessed. Results Overall, 2260 adolescents 12 to 15 years of age received injections; 1131 received BNT162b2, and 1129 received placebo. As has been found in other age groups, BNT162b2 had a favorable safety and side-effect profile, with mainly transient mild-to-moderate reactogenicity (predominantly injection-site pain [in 79 to 86% of participants], fatigue [in 60 to 66%], and headache [in 55 to 65%]); there were no vaccine-related serious adverse events and few overall severe adverse events. The geometric mean ratio of SARS-CoV-2 50% neutralizing titers after dose 2 in 12-to-15-year-old participants relative to 16-to-25-year-old participants was 1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47 to 2.10), which met the noninferiority criterion of a lower boundary of the two-sided 95% confidence interval greater than 0.67 and indicated a greater response in the 12-to-15-year-old cohort. Among participants without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, no Covid-19 cases with an onset of 7 or more days after dose 2 were noted among BNT162b2 recipients, and 16 cases occurred among placebo recipients. The observed vaccine efficacy was 100% (95% CI, 75.3 to 100). Conclusions The BNT162b2 vaccine in 12-to-15-year-old recipients had a favorable safety profile, produced a greater immune response than in young adults, and was highly effective against Covid-19. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; C4591001 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.)

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have afflicted tens of millions of people in a worldwide pandemic. Safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently.In an ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned persons 16 years of age or older in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses, 21 days apart, of either placebo or the BNT162b2 vaccine candidate (30 μg per dose). BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle-formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine that encodes a prefusion stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein. The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and safety.A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo. There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to placebo; BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6). Similar vaccine efficacy (generally 90 to 100%) was observed across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, ethnicity, baseline body-mass index, and the presence of coexisting conditions. Among 10 cases of severe Covid-19 with onset after the first dose, 9 occurred in placebo recipients and 1 in a BNT162b2 recipient. The safety profile of BNT162b2 was characterized by short-term, mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. The incidence of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups.A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.).

Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections and the resulting disease, coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), have spread to millions of persons worldwide. Multiple vaccine candidates are under development, but no vaccine is currently available. Interim safety and immunogenicity data about the vaccine candidate BNT162b1 in younger adults have been reported previously from trials in Germany and the United States. Methods In an ongoing, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, dose-escalation, phase 1 trial conducted in the United States, we randomly assigned healthy adults 18 to 55 years of age and those 65 to 85 years of age to receive either placebo or one of two lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine candidates: BNT162b1, which encodes a secreted trimerized SARS-CoV-2 receptor–binding domain; or BNT162b2, which encodes a membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike, stabilized in the prefusion conformation. The primary outcome was safety (e.g., local and systemic reactions and adverse events); immunogenicity was a secondary outcome. Trial groups were defined according to vaccine candidate, age of the participants, and vaccine dose level (10 μg, 20 μg, 30 μg, and 100 μg). In all groups but one, participants received two doses, with a 21-day interval between doses; in one group (100 μg of BNT162b1), participants received one dose. Results A total of 195 participants underwent randomization. In each of 13 groups of 15 participants, 12 participants received vaccine and 3 received placebo. BNT162b2 was associated with a lower incidence and severity of systemic reactions than BNT162b1, particularly in older adults. In both younger and older adults, the two vaccine candidates elicited similar dose-dependent SARS-CoV-2–neutralizing geometric mean titers, which were similar to or higher than the geometric mean titer of a panel of SARS-CoV-2 convalescent serum samples. Conclusions The safety and immunogenicity data from this U.S. phase 1 trial of two vaccine candidates in younger and older adults, added to earlier interim safety and immunogenicity data regarding BNT162b1 in younger adults from trials in Germany and the United States, support the selection of BNT162b2 for advancement to a pivotal phase 2–3 safety and efficacy evaluation. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.)

BackgroundSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections and the resulting disease, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), have spread to millions of people globally. Multiple vaccine candidates are under development, but no vaccine is currently available.MethodsHealthy adults 18–55 and 65–85 years of age were randomized in an ongoing, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded dose-escalation study to receive 2 doses at 21-day intervals of placebo or either of 2 lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine candidates: BNT162b1, which encodes a secreted trimerized SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain, or BNT162b2, which encodes a prefusion stabilized membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike. In each of 13 groups of 15 participants, 12 received vaccine and 3 received placebo. Groups were distinguished by vaccine candidate, age of participant, and vaccine dose level. Interim safety and immunogenicity data of BNT162b1 in younger adults have been reported previously from US and German trials. We now present additional safety and immunogenicity data from the US Phase 1 trial that supported selection of the vaccine candidate advanced to a pivotal Phase 2/3 safety and efficacy evaluation.ResultsIn both younger and older adults, the 2 vaccine candidates elicited similar dose- dependent SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing geometric mean titers (GMTs), comparable to or higher than the GMT of a panel of SARS-CoV-2 convalescent sera. BNT162b2 was associated with less systemic reactogenicity, particularly in older adults.ConclusionThese results support selection of the BNT162b2 vaccine candidate for Phase 2/3 large-scale safety and efficacy evaluation, currently underway.

Background: Patients with cancer are at higher risk of developing COVID-19 disease, adverse outcomes, and increased mortality. Phase III COVID-19 vaccine trials have demonstrated safety/efficacy against COVID-19 and prevented hospitalizations and deaths;however, most excluded ptcpts with cancer. We present phase 3 tozinameran mRNA COVID-19 vaccine trial results from ptcpts with a cancer history at baseline, either ongoing or not, per the Charlson Comorbidity Index and up to 6 months of follow-up. Methods: Between Jul 2020-Jan 2021, 46429 ptcpts ≥12 y at 152 sites in 6 countries were randomized in a placebo-controlled, observer-blinded trial of 2-dose tozinameran, showing 95% protection against COVID-19 and favorable safety (Polack et al NEJM, Dec 2020). After emergency use authorization, ptcpts were allowed to unblind and placebo recipients received vaccine. Data prior to unblinding for crossover up to 13 Mar 2021 are presented for ptcpts ≥16 y for safety and ≥12 y for efficacy. Adverse event (AE) data are controlled for follow-up time before unblinding and reported as incidence rate (IR) per 100-person-y of follow-up. Results: Of ptcpts ≥16 y, 1647 had a prior diagnosis of cancer and were not on active immunosuppressive treatment (755 M;892 F;median age 66 y [range 22-91]). Most common solid cancers included breast (n=458), prostate (n=360), and melanoma (n=210). AEs were reported at IRs of 94.0 (vaccine) and 49.3 (placebo) per 100-person-y;most common AEs were reactogenicity events (injection-site pain [IR: 40.2 vaccine;4.2 placebo];fatigue [IR: 21.4 vaccine;7.6 placebo];pyrexia [IR: 19.8 vaccine;0.7 placebo]). 1 vaccine ptcpt withdrew due to a vaccine-related AE. No vaccine-related deaths were reported. Among ptcpts ≥12 y with cancer, 3 vaccine and 27 placebo recipients developed COVID-19 from 7 days post-Dose 2;vaccine efficacy (VE) was 89.7% (95% CI 66.5-98.0%). This compares favorably with overall VE of 91.1%. Updated results will be presented. Conclusions: Tozinameran has similar efficacy/safety in ptcpts with cancer as in the overall population. These results inform tozinameran use in COVID-19 and in future trials in patients with cancer. Clinical trial identification: NCT04368728. Editorial acknowledgement: Editorial assistance was provided by Erin Bekes, PhD, of CMC AFFINITY, McCann Health Medical Communications, and was funded by Pfizer. Legal entity responsible for the study: Study sponsored by BioNTech, managed by Pfizer. Funding: Pfizer and BioNTech. Disclosure: S.J. Thomas: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant, Advisory role: Pfizer. J.L. Perez: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer. S.P. Lockhart: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer. S. Hariharan: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer. N. Kitchin: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer. R. Bailey: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer. K. Liau: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer. E. Lagkadinou: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: BioNTech. O. Tureci: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: BioNTech. U. Sahin: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: BioNTech. X. Xu: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer. S.S. Dychter: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer. C. Lu: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Pfizer. W. Gruber: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis is associated with serious complications and a high fatality rate. Asymptomatic individuals can harbor the bacterium in the throat, a state known as “carriage,” which can lead to person-to-person spread of the pathogen. This study examined N. meningitidis carriage from 2010 to 2013 among 2 groups in the Quebec City region: ninth-grade students (aged 13 to 15 years), who were also followed in their last year of high school (eleventh grade/college entry; 16 to 18 years), and university students (18 to 25 years); both groups have been shown in some other geographic regions to have high rates of carriage. This study demonstrated that N. meningitidis carriage rates were higher among university students in dormitories than ninth-grade and eleventh-grade/college entry students. Understanding carriage rates in these age groups leads to better strategies to control N. meningitidis by targeting vaccination to those responsible for transmission within the population., Neisseria meningitidis carriage data are necessary to inform serogroup B (NmB) immunization program implementation. This longitudinal study compared detection methods to measure N. meningitidis throat carriage prevalence in Quebec from November 2010 to December 2013 using cultured swab isolates and direct swab PCR from students in ninth grade (aged 13 to 15 years; n = 534) and eleventh grade/college entry (16 to 18 years; n = 363) and in university students in dormitories (18 to 25 years; n = 360) at 3 time points per group. Meningococcal and NmB carriage rates were lower in ninth- and eleventh-grade/college entry students than university students, regardless of methodology. Genotyping cultured isolates by PCR detected NmB and non-NmB in 2.1% and 7.3% of ninth-grade students, in 1.7% and 7.2% of eleventh-grade/college entry students, and in 7.5% and 21.9% of university students, respectively. NmB acquisition rates were 1.9, 0.7, and 3.3 per 1,000 person-months across respective age groups. Most NmB isolates (94.7%, 76.9%, and 86.8%, respectively) expressed subfamily A factor H binding-protein (fHBP) variants. The most common non-NmB serogroups were NmY (1.7%/1.1%) from ninth grade and eleventh grade/college entry and NmW (2.8%) from university students. Genomic analyses detected disease-associated sequence types in carriage isolates, and carriage could persist for months. This is the largest longitudinal carriage study in Canada and the first to report fHBP variants in NmB carriage isolates in healthy Canadians. These data contribute to identification of the optimal window for NmB vaccination in precollege adolescents and provide a baseline for investigating NmB vaccination effects on carriage in this population. IMPORTANCE Disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis is associated with serious complications and a high fatality rate. Asymptomatic individuals can harbor the bacterium in the throat, a state known as “carriage,” which can lead to person-to-person spread of the pathogen. This study examined N. meningitidis carriage from 2010 to 2013 among 2 groups in the Quebec City region: ninth-grade students (aged 13 to 15 years), who were also followed in their last year of high school (eleventh grade/college entry; 16 to 18 years), and university students (18 to 25 years); both groups have been shown in some other geographic regions to have high rates of carriage. This study demonstrated that N. meningitidis carriage rates were higher among university students in dormitories than ninth-grade and eleventh-grade/college entry students. Understanding carriage rates in these age groups leads to better strategies to control N. meningitidis by targeting vaccination to those responsible for transmission within the population.

Background Clostroidides difficile (C difficile) is a common cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. To date, there is no vaccine to prevent C. difficile infection (CDI). This extension of a phase 2 study explores the immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of a 4th dose, and antibody persistence of a three-dose regimen of a toxoid-based C difficile vaccine in 300 healthy adults 65 to 85 years of age in the United States. Methods The first stage of this study was conducted from 16 July 2015 to 7 March 2017, in which subjects were enrolled and randomized to receive one of two antigen dose levels (100µg or 200µg total toxoid A and B) or placebo, administered in one of two three-dose regimens: Days 1, 8 & 30 or Months 0, 1 & 6. Immunogenicity testing was conducted on samples obtained at each of nine study visits through 12 months post dose 3. In this extension stage, subjects who had received vaccine in the first stage were re-randomized at 12 months post dose 3 to receive either a booster dose or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Subjects were followed for immunogenicity three (3) years post booster (four years post dose #3) Results Peak antibody response to vaccination was observed between day 8 and 30 following booster administration. Both regimens demonstrated robust anamnestic responses with peak levels above the three-dose peak (stage 1). Toxin A geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) remained above pre-booster GMCs, 3 years post booster for both dose levels and regimens. Antibody persistence for both groups demonstrated stable antibody levels four years after the primary vaccination series among subjects who did not receive a booster dose. No Grade 4 reactogenicity was reported during the study. Pain was the most common local reaction. Adverse event rates per subject were similar between both regimens and placebo. There were no Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) considered related to the investigational product at any dose or regimen. The safety profile was consistent with what was seen in the first stage of the study. Conclusion A booster dose of Clostroidides difficile vaccine candidate is highly immunogenic, well tolerated and demonstrates an acceptable safety profile in both dose groups for the Day and the Month regimens. Antibody persistence remains stable from 12 months to 4-year post dose 3. Disclosures Nicholas Kitchin, MD, Pfizer, Inc (Employee) Michael W. Pride, PhD, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder) Annaliesa S. Anderson, PhD, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder) Chris Webber, MD, Pfizer Inc (Employee, Shareholder)

Background Two formulations of investigational bivalent Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile vaccine (QS-21 adjuvanted toxoid and toxoid-alone) were assessed for safety and immunogenicity in randomized studies in healthy adults 50–85 years of age. Methods The Phase 1 study of QS-21 adjuvanted toxoid vaccine randomized subjects 3:1 to 100 μg QS-21-containing C difficile vaccine or placebo; 3 doses were given according to 2 different schedules: a shortened month (Months 0, 1, 3) or day (Days 1, 8, 30) regimen. The Phase 2 toxoid-alone vaccine study randomized subjects 3:3:1 to receive 100 or 200 μg unadjuvanted C difficile vaccine formulation or placebo in Stages 1 and 2 (sentinel cohorts of different age groups), and 3:1 to receive the selected dose of unadjuvanted C difficile vaccine formulation or placebo in Stage 3. Three doses were given on a day (Days 1, 8, 30) regimen. Safety was the primary outcome for both studies. Immunogenicity was determined by measuring serum toxin A– and B–specific neutralizing antibodies. Results In the day regimen, 10 reports across both studies of grade 3 injection site redness postdose 2 triggered predefined stopping rules. Local reactions in both studies were more common among vaccine versus placebo recipients. Injection site pain predominated and was generally mild in severity. Systemic events were infrequent and generally mild-to-moderate in severity. Adverse events were reported by 50.0%–75.0% and 16.7%–50.0% of subjects in the QS-21 and toxoid-alone studies, respectively. Immune responses peaked around Day 37 (shortened-month regimen) or between Day 15 and Month 2 (day regimen), and remained above baseline throughout follow-up. Conclusion Both formulations demonstrated robust immunogenicity. However, both studies stopped early due to grade 3 injection site redness postdose 2 of the day (Days 1, 8, 30) regimen; neither formulation progressed to later stage development. Instead, an aluminum hydroxide-containing formulation of the vaccine candidate administered at 0, 1, and 6 months, which was safe and immunogenic in phase 1 and 2 studies, advanced to phase 3 studies. Disclosures Jody Lawrence, MD, Pfizer, Inc (Employee) Nicholas Kitchin, MD, Pfizer, Inc (Employee) Annaliesa S. Anderson, PhD, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder) Michael W. Pride, PhD, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder) Kathrin U. Jansen, PhD, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder) William C. Gruber, MD, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder) Yahong Peng, PhD, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder) Charles Knirsch, MD, Pfizer (Employee) Chris Webber, MD, Pfizer Inc (Employee, Shareholder)

This serological follow up study assessed the kinetics of antibody response in children who previously participated in a single centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial of low-dose compared to standard-dose diphtheria booster preschool vaccinations in the United Kingdom (UK). Children had previously been randomised to receive one of three combination vaccines: either a combined adsorbed tetanus, low-dose diphtheria, 5-component acellular pertussis and inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) (Tdap-IPV, Repevax(®); Sanofi Pasteur MSD); a combined adsorbed tetanus, low-dose diphtheria and 5-component acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap, Covaxis(®); Sanofi Pasteur MSD) given concomitantly with oral polio vaccine (OPV); or a combined adsorbed standard-dose diphtheria, tetanus, 2-component acellular pertussis and IPV (DTap-IPV, Tetravac(®); Sanofi Pasteur MSD). Blood samples for the follow-up study were taken at 1, 3 and 5 years after participation in the original trial (median, 5.07 years of age at year 1), and antibody persistence to each vaccine antigen measured against defined serological thresholds of protection. All participants had evidence of immunity to diphtheria with antitoxin concentrations greater than 0.01IU/mL five years after booster vaccination and 75%, 67% and 79% of children who received Tdap-IPV, Tdap+OPV and DTap-IPV, respectively, had protective antitoxin levels greater than 0.1IU/mL. Long lasting protective immune responses to tetanus and polio antigens were also observed in all groups, though polio responses were lower in the sera of those who received OPV. Low-dose diphtheria vaccines provided comparable protection to the standard-dose vaccine and are suitable for use for pre-school booster vaccination.

OBJECTIVES: Recent development of serogroup B meningococcal (MenB) vaccines highlights the importance of pharyngeal carriage data, particularly in adolescents and young adults, to inform implementation strategies. We describe current UK carriage prevalence in this high risk population and compare methods of carriage detection. METHODS: In this multisite study, pharyngeal swabs were collected on 3-4 occasions over 6-12 months, from 1040 school and university students, aged 10-25 years. Meningococcal carriage was detected by standard culture combined with seroagglutination or PCR of cultured isolates, or by direct PCR from swab. The factor H binding protein (fHBP) variants present in meningococcal isolates were determined. RESULTS: Meningococcal serogroups B and Y were most common, with carriage up to 6.5% and 5.5% respectively, increasing throughout adolescence. Identification by seroagglutination was often unreliable, and the sensitivity of direct PCR detection was 66% compared to culture combined with PCR. Of MenB isolates, 89.1% had subfamily A variants of fHBP. The acquisition rate of MenB carriage was estimated at 2.8 per 1000 person-months. CONCLUSIONS: If vaccination is to precede the adolescent rise in MenB carriage, these data suggest it should take place in early adolescence. Studies assessing vaccine impact should use molecular methods to detect carriage.

This open, randomised controlled trial studied the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of two combined low-dose diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis vaccines (Td5aP-IPV, REPEVAX™, Aventis Pasteur MSD; and Td5aP, COVAXIS™, Aventis Pasteur MSD + OPV, GlaxoSmithKline) in comparison with a standard dose diptheria pre-school booster vaccine (DT2aP-IPV, TETRAVAC™, Aventis Pasteur MSD) in a population of 3.5-6 year-old children administered concomitantly with measles, mumps and rubella vaccine (M-M-R™II, Aventis Pasteur MSD). A linked sub-study aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of Td5aP-IPV in a population of younger children, aged 3-3.5 years. This study demonstrated non-inferiority of seroprotection rates for diphtheria and tetanus for the study vaccines and comparable immunogenicity for pertussis and polio components of the vaccines. Reactogenicity was similar for all three vaccines. The study vaccines containing low-dose diphtheria antigen (Td5aP-IPV and Td5aP + OPV) are immunogenic and have acceptable reactogenicity for use as a pre-school booster vaccine administered concomitantly with MMR.

This open-label, randomised, controlled study examined antibody persistence following infant vaccination at 2, 3 and 4 months of age with either an acellular pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus, inactivated poliovirus, Haemophilus influenzae type b (DT 5 aP-IPV-Hib; Pediacel ® ) or a whole-cell pertussis (DTwP//Hib + oral poliomyelitis vaccine [OPV]) combination vaccine, given concomitantly with meningococcal serogroup C conjugate (MCC) vaccine, followed by a Hib booster at approximately 15 months of age. Immune responses were sustained to 3.5–4.5 years of age for all antigens contained in Pediacel. Administration of an acellular pertussis-containing quadrivalent pre-school booster (Td 5 ap-IPV; Repevax ® ), with or without measles, mumps and rubella (M-M-R™II) vaccine, induced robust antibody responses indicative of protection, regardless of the vaccine used for the primary series. Reactogenicity of Repevax was acceptable and consistent with previous experience.

Introduction Clostridium difficile is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitals, nursing homes, and long-term care facilities. The bacteria can produce 3 toxins, of which the C. difficile toxin A and C. difficile toxin B are the principal virulence factors for C. difficile-associated disease. Methods A phase 1, first-in-human, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study was performed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of an investigational vaccine candidate consisting of genetically and chemically detoxified, purified toxins A and B. The toxoids, either alone or in combination with aluminum hydroxide (Al(OH)3), were administered to healthy adults 50–85 years of age at antigen dose levels of 50, 100, or 200 μg in a 3-dose regimen administered at 0, 1, and 6 months. Results Overall, the C. difficile vaccine formulations and doses administered were generally well tolerated. Local reactions and systemic events were predominantly mild to moderate, were more common in the 50–64-year age cohort, and comprised mostly injection site pain, headache, and fatigue. In subjects who received the vaccine formulations, both the toxin A- and toxin B-specific neutralizing antibody geometric mean concentrations increased substantially at 1 month after Dose 2 and after Dose 3 compared to baseline. In the 50–64-year age cohort, geometric mean fold rises (GMFRs) in toxin A-specific neutralizing antibodies from baseline at Month 7 ranged from 59.19 to 149.23 in the vaccine groups compared to 2.47 in the control group. For toxin-B specific neutralizing antibodies, the GMFRs from baseline at Month 7 ranged from 116.67 to 2503.75 in the vaccine groups compared to 2.48 in the control group. In the 65–85-year age cohort, GMFRs in toxin A-specific neutralizing antibodies from baseline at Month 7 ranged from 42.73 to 254.77 in the vaccine groups compared to 2.03 in the control group. For toxin-B specific neutralizing antibodies, the GMFRs from baseline at Month 7 ranged from 136.12 to 4922.80 in the vaccine groups compared to 1.58 in the control group. Potent antitoxin neutralizing responses were still evident in immunized subjects in both age groups at Month 12. Although there was no clear dose-level response pattern, the data suggest that both the antitoxin A- and B-specific neutralizing responses were trending higher in the toxoid-only groups compared to the toxoid + Al(OH)3 groups. Furthermore, the magnitude of the immune response was similar in the 2 age cohorts. Conclusion The vaccine formulations studied in this phase 1 study were immunogenic and well tolerated. The results presented support further development of the C. difficile vaccine candidate in a larger population of subjects to determine the optimal dose and immunization schedule. Clinical trial registry NCT01706367 .

Two hundred forty-one healthy infants were enrolled in an open randomised controlled study of three doses of DTaP-IPV-Hib (Group 1) or DTwP/Hib+OPV (Group 2) at 2, 3 and 4 months of age given concurrently with a meningitis C conjugate vaccine. After each dose, local reactions (any grade) were less common in Group 1 than Group 2 (p0.03). Axillary temperature37.5 degrees C, decreased feeding, reduced activity, irritability and crying in the week after vaccination were also less common in Group 1 than Group 2 (p0.05 for each symptom, all doses combined). Severe local reactions and systemic symptoms were uncommon and occurred equally in both groups. The pentavalent DTaP-IPV-Hib vaccine was less reactogenic than the quadrivalent DTwP-Hib vaccine, as expected when changing from whole cell pertussis (wP) to an acellular pertussis (aP) component.

In the first UK study to examine feasibility and acceptability of universal adolescent hepatitis B vaccination, the costs associated with the administration and uptake (80.2 and 89.3% for three doses and at least two doses, respectively), of a three-dose regimen in pupils in Glasgow schools (2001/2002) were measured. These data were used to estimate the economic outlay for the delivery of a routine, ongoing three-dose and two-dose hepatitis B vaccine programme in schools. Vaccine, accounting for almost 70% of the overall costs, was the largest cost item for both the pilot and routine programmes, using either regimen. However, the ongoing, two-dose regimen was the cheapest option in this analysis, irrespective of vaccine price. Cost data from this study may be useful for other countries wishing to implement a similar programme.

A prospective, randomised, observer-blind, comparative study was performed in healthy adults with a new hepatitis A/typhoid combined vaccine, Viatim, and the marketed Hepatyrix vaccine. Both vaccines induced high levels of protective antibodies, but typhoid responses were higher and hepatitis A responses more rapid with Viatim compared with Hepatyrix. Both vaccines were well tolerated, no serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred, but more Viatim vaccinees had more mild or moderate local reactions (82.7%) than Hepatyrix (53.1%, p < 0.001). In this direct comparison Viatim induced more local reactions, but elicited a more rapid and higher immune response to both antigens than Hepatyrix.

As a service to healthcare professionals, Aventis Pasteur MSD UK Ltd. operates a telephone-based Vaccine Information Service, providing information on all aspects of vaccination. In the UK it is the primary means by which spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports are received by the company. It was brought to the attention of the Pharmacovigilance Department that a significant number of calls related to people seeking advice following inadvertent administration of vaccines. To inform our advice it was decided to collect details of such episodes, to enquire whether an adverse drug reaction had already occurred, and to encourage reporting of adverse drug reaction that may occur subsequently. Inadvertent vaccination during pregnancy was not included in this survey since these data were already being collected separately. During the period from 1 September 1999 to 31 August 2000 the Vaccine Information Service received 124,010 enquiries. Of these, 302 (0.2%) concerned inadvertent administration of one or more vaccines (all age groups), 161 (53.2% of total inadvertent administration) of them in children (

Objectives: Current information on rates and dynamics of meningococcal carriage is essential for public health policy. This study aimed to determine meningococcal carriage prevalence, its risk factors and duration in the Netherlands, where meningococcal C vaccine coverage is >90%. Several methods to identify serogroups of meningococcal carriage isolates among adolescent and young adults were compared. Methods: Oropharyngeal swabs were collected from 1715 participants 13-23 years of age in 2013-2014; 300 were prospectively followed over 8 months. Cultured isolates were characterized by Ouchterlony, real-time (rt-) PCR or whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Direct swabs were assessed by rt-PCR. Questionnaires on environmental factors and behaviour were also obtained. Results: A meningococcal isolate was identified in 270/1715 (16%) participants by culture. Of MenB isolates identified by whole genome sequencing, 37/72 (51%) were correctly serogrouped by Ouchterlony, 46/51 (90%) by rt-PCR of cultured isolates, and 39/51 (76%) by rt-PCR directly on swabs. A sharp increase in carriage was observed before the age of 15 years. The age-related association disappeared after correction for smoking, level of education, frequent attendance to crowded social venues, kissing in the previous week and alcohol consumption. Three participants carried the same strain identified at three consecutive visits in an 8-month period. In these isolates, progressively acquired mutations were observed. Conclusions: Whole genome sequencing of culture isolates was the most sensitive method for serogroup identification. Based upon results of this study and risk of meningococcal disease, an adolescent meningococcal vaccination might include children before the age of 15 years to confer individual protection and potentially to establish herd protection. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

To investigate whether Vaqta™ may be used as a booster in subjects primed with Avaxim™, 127 adults primed 6 months previously with Avaxim™ were randomised to receive either Vaqta™ or Avaxim™ as a booster. Prior to the booster all subjects were seropositive. Geometric mean antibody titres increased from 496 to 7262 mIU/mL 1 month after receiving Vaqta™ as a booster and from 325 to 5131 mIU/mL 1 month after receiving Avaxim™ as a booster. Both vaccines were well tolerated; 20.3% of subjects receiving Vaqta™ experienced a local reaction, compared to 39.7% of those receiving Avaxim™. Systemic reactions were reported by 15.6% of those receiving Vaqta™ and 14.3% of those receiving Avaxim™. Vaqta™ may be used as a booster in subjects primed with Avaxim™.

Objective: Metrifonate, through its active metabolite dichlorvos, is an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor effective in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Patients with AD often require treatment with warfarin, which has a narrow therapeutic index. In view of the many reported interactions of warfarin, it was essential to ascertain whether the combined administration of metrifonate and warfarin altered the anticoagulant actions of warfarin. This study was therefore designed to determine the effects of pretreatment with multiple doses of metrifonate or placebo on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of a single dose of warfarin in healthy persons. Design: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-treatment, two-period, crossover study. The participants received metrifonate 50mg once daily or matching placebo for two periods of 8 days each, separated by a 21-day period. On the morning of the fourth day of each 8-day period, every participant received 25mg of racemic warfarin (5 sX 5mg oral tablets). Study Participants: Fourteen healthy Caucasians (12 men and two women), aged 18 to 45 years, were included. Target Parameters: The effects of pretreatment with metrifonate or placebo on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of warfarin were evaluated, as assessed by plasma concentrations of (R)- and (S)-warfarin, prothrombin time and factor VII activity. The safety and tolerability of both treatments was recorded. Results: The 90% confidence intervals for the true mean ratios of warfarin plus metrifonate to warfarin alone were within the range of 0.80 to 1.25 for the primary test parameters, area under the curve (AUC) of prothrombin time versus time and maximum prothrombin time, as well as for the AUC of plasma concentration versus time and the maximum plasma concentration for both warfarin enantiomers. The two treatments were equivalent with regard to these parameters. The study drugs were generally well tolerated. Conclusion: Pretreatment with a therapeutic dose of metrifonate does not significantly influence the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic characteristics of a single dose of warfarin in healthy volunteers. Based on the similarity in pharmacokinetics of metrifonate in volunteers and patients with AD, this study also predicts the absence of an effect of metrifonate on warfarin in the target population of the drug.

Diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccines have formed the cornerstone of childhood immunization programs for decades. Historically, these have comprised diphtheria and tetanus toxoids combined with inactivated whole-cell pertussis. More recently, advances have been made with the development of purified acellular pertussis vaccines, with improved reactogenicity profiles, and formulation with additional vaccines such as Haemophilus influenzae type b, hepatitis B virus and inactivated poliovirus. Development is currently focused on maximizing the number of vaccines that can be combined in a single formulation and strategies to provide protection against pertussis before the commencement of routine infant immunization.

Background and objective: In view of the possible introduction of diphtheria–tetanus–acellular pertussis–inactivated poliovirus– Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTaP-IPV-Hib, eg Pediacel) vaccine in the UK, a study of the immunogenicity of Pediacel when given with one of two different meningococcal group C conjugate (MCC) vaccines at 2, 3 and 4 months of age was conducted. Methods: Randomised controlled study in 241 infants. Results: Post vaccination, the proportion of infants with anti-polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) levels ⩾0.15 μg/ml was 93.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 86.6 to 96.7) in the Pediacel group compared with 100% (95% CI 96.4 to 100) in the diphtheria–tetanus–whole-cell pertussis– Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTwP-Hib) group. The anti-PRP response was lower in infants receiving either Pediacel or DTwP-Hib when these vaccines were given concomitantly with meningococcal group C conjugate with diphtheria-derived protein CRM 197 as conjugate protein (MCC-CRM) compared with meningococcal group C conjugate with tetanus toxoid as conjugate protein (MCC-TT). For group C meningococcus, the proportion of infants with serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) titre ⩾1:8 in the Pediacel group was 99.0% compared with 100% in the DTwP-Hib group. The MCC SBA geometric mean titre (GMT) was lower in those receiving Pediacel with MCC-TT than in those receiving DTwP-Hib with MCC-TT, although all titres were well above the protective threshold. The MCC SBA GMT was similar in those receiving Pediacel and DTwP-Hib and MCC-CRM. Responses to all other vaccine components were equivalent in the two groups. Conclusions: Pediacel is immunogenic when given at 2, 3 and 4 months of age. Coadministration of MCC vaccine can influence the Hib response, and the MCC response to a tetanus conjugate can be influenced by the nature of the coadministered DTP-Hib vaccine.