Search

Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic used for prophylaxis and treatment of acute bleeding. Although fixed dosing is often used in practice, weight-based dosing is sometimes used in the operating room (OR). The efficacy and safety of fixed-dose TXA is not well established in patients with above average weight or body mass index. Objective: To characterize the efficacy and safety of intravenous TXA in obese patients with major bleeding. Methods: This was a retrospective review of 165 patients receiving fixed-dose TXA for acute bleeding outside the OR. Blood product administration (BPA) before and after TXA was collected, along with demographic and bleed-related information. Thrombotic events were the major safety end point. A prespecified subgroup analysis was conducted in patients weighing at least 100 kg compared with a lower weight. Logistic regression was performed to determine whether an association exists between body weight and blood product requirement after TXA administration. Results: In the 24 hours after TXA, patients received an average of 4.17 units of blood product. Patients weighing at least 100 kg averaged 4.04 total units, compared with 4.19 units in the lower weight group ( P = 0.603). Administration of individual blood products did not differ between groups, and thrombotic events were similar. Regression analysis did not associate weight with total BPA. Conclusion and Relevance: In patients receiving fixed-dose TXA, weight does not appear to alter blood product requirements or rates of adverse thrombotic events. These data support continued use of fixed-dose TXA for treatment of acute major bleeding in obese patients.

Background: Despite known disease-specific alterations to anti–factor Xa (AXA) levels, the physiological response of patients with cirrhosis to unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusions is not well established in clinical settings. Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize the dosing and safety profile of UFH in patients with varying degrees of cirrhosis when treated for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at a single academic medical center in the United States. Patients with a diagnosis of cirrhosis who received UFH infusions for greater than 48 hours for treatment of VTE were included. Comparisons between heparin infusion rates, AXA levels, and safety outcomes based on severity of cirrhosis were made to define differences between those groups. Results: When compared by compensation status or by Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class, patients with more severe disease trended toward lower initial AXA levels on heparin initiation and higher heparin requirements to achieve therapeutic levels and were significantly less likely to achieve therapeutic levels than patients with less severe disease ( P = 0.001 for compensation, P = 0.017 for CTP). Additionally, bleeding rates were higher in patients with more severe disease, without reaching statistical significance. Conclusion and Relevance: Patients with severe cirrhosis required higher doses of heparin to achieve the same therapeutic AXA levels, but also tended to have higher rates of bleeding compared with less severe cirrhosis. These results represent further evidence of changes in heparin response as cirrhosis severity increases and may suggest that current monitoring methods are suboptimal in this patient population.

Over the past decades, awareness and attention given to food allergies has extended further into the realm of pharmacotherapy. Despite the presence of similar ingredients, different intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE)-based medication products have a wide variety of warnings and contraindications for patients with food allergies. Only limited literature is available to guide clinicians in making appropriate medication therapy adjustments to reduce the risk of hypersensitivity reactions in atopic patient populations. Therefore, the authors sought to develop a comprehensive review of potential risk factors or approaches for management of patients with atopic history and need for ILE therapy. Through thorough review of available literature published worldwide, a description of potential contraindications, risk factors, and evaluation methods is presented. Although the current state of knowledge remains relatively poor, this review aims to provide clinicians a better understanding of which risk factors related to the development of hypersensitivity reactions are relevant to lipid emulsion products and how to best manage patients who may be at risk for severe reaction based on their history. Evaluating personal atopic history is essential to the development of an appropriate risk classification system and approaching an individual's therapeutic options. By applying this assessment to local populations, providers should be able to develop an institutional guideline for screening and minimizing risk of substantial hypersensitivity reactions. Finally, a brief review of methods for managing type 1 hypersensitivity reactions is provided in the event that a breakthrough reaction does occur.