1. Is there an advantage? Considerations for researchers studying the effects of the type of Medicare coverage
- Author
-
Nicholas, Lauren Hersch, Polsky, Dan, Darden, Michael, Xu, Jianhui, Anderson, Kelly, and Meyers, David J.
- Subjects
Medicare -- Services -- Research ,Business ,Health care industry - Abstract
Objective: To describe common methodological problems that arise in comparisons of Medicare Advantage (MA) and Traditional Medicare (TM) and within-MA studies and provide suggestions of how researchers can address these issues. Study Setting: Published research evaluating Medicare coverage options in the United States. Study Design: We considered key conceptual challenges and promising solutions that have been used thus far and suggest additional directions. Data Collection: Not available. Principal Findings: Many existing studies of MA versus TM include significant limitations, such as failing to account for unobserved confounders driving both beneficiary coverage choice and health outcomes once enrolled, not accounting for variation in benefit generosity, provider networks, or plan design across MA plans, and/or having been conducted at a time when MA enrollment was less than a third of all Medicare beneficiaries. We provide a review of methods that can help researchers to overcome these weaknesses and suggest additional methods and data sources that may aid future research. Conclusions: The MA program is becoming an essential part of the US healthcare system. By accounting for non-random movement into and out of MA and studying the heterogeneity of beneficiary experience across plan and market characteristics, researchers can provide the high-quality evidence necessary for policymakers to design the program and reform TM in ways that maximize beneficiary outcomes. KEYWORDS insurance choice, Medicare, Medicare Advantage, study design What is known on this topic * When comparing outcomes across Medicare Advantage (MA) and Traditional Medicare (TM), researchers should be aware of several key challenges: non-random program participation, commonly known as selection effects; heterogeneity across plans within the MA program; varying coverage choices within TM; spillovers between the programs; and differential coding incentives. * However, many existing papers do not account for these challenges, limiting generalizability of findings. What this study adds * We describe the common conceptual challenges that researchers must confront when comparing Medicare coverage options and summarize methodological strategies that may help with these issues. * Designing studies that account for the issues raised in this paper will help researchers conduct rigorous evaluations of the MA program, providing important information to policymakers and Medicare beneficiaries about outcomes in MA versus TM., 1 | INTRODUCTION The Medicare Advantage (MA) program is rapidly growing, doubling in enrollment from 13 million beneficiaries in 2012 to 31 million beneficiaries in 2023, (1) with over half [...]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF