Search

Introduction: Management of a withdrawal syndrome following cessation of regular gamma‐hydroxybutyrate (GHB) use, and its precursors, can represent a clinical challenge due to rapid onset delirium and/or seizures. Severe GHB withdrawal can be characterised by persistent or worsening features despite increasing benzodiazepine doses and regular baclofen. Barbiturates, such as phenobarbital, are an appealing option in this context due to their unique GABA‐A receptor action. Case Series: This series describes the use of phenobarbital in 13 cases, 12 patients, across two hospitals in Sydney, Australia, with persistent or progressive GHB withdrawal despite benzodiazepine‐based management. A median cumulative dose of oral diazepam prior to commencing phenobarbital was 120 mg (range 80–255 mg). The median time from the last GHB use to the first dose of phenobarbital was 24 h (range 7–57 h). Eight cases received phenobarbital orally on a general ward and 5 intravenously in intensive care units. An improvement in GHB withdrawal symptoms was observed after phenobarbital in all cases and there were no adverse events related to phenobarbital. Discussion and Conclusion: This case series suggests that phenobarbital for the management of benzodiazepine‐resistant GHB withdrawal can be safe, even in general inpatient settings, and may avert the progression of delirium. Most data on the management of GHB withdrawal comes from case reports or series, such as this one. This highlights the need for prospective trials to establish an evidence base for therapeutic approaches, including validated measures of withdrawal severity and more information relating to the safe and effective dosing of phenobarbital. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionIn 2015, Australia and New Zealand treatment guidelines recommended a 2 h paracetamol serum concentration for risk assessment of unintentional paracetamol liquid exposures. We assess our experience with this approach.Retrospective case review of children <6 years-old with liquid paracetamol overdoses referred to a regional poisons information centre January 2017 to August 2022. We extracted data on the exposure and management from the poisons information centre and hospital medical records. We identified additional cases with two paracetamol concentrations obtained from September 2022 to June 2024.Of 437 paediatric poisonings, 271 were eligible for inclusion. The median age was 24 months, the median time to presentation was 120 min, and paracetamol was the sole ingestant in 92% of cases. Blood testing was recommended in 131 patients (48.3%), occurring at 2 h post-ingestion in 62 patients (47.3%). Testing at a later time was mostly due to delayed presentation, including to hospitals unable to measure paracetamol concentrations. Eighteen patients (16.7%) had repeat blood testing, and five additional cases were identified in the subsequent period. Overall, the concentration decreased in 19 patients (83%), but in three patients it increased, from 73 mg/L to 81 mg/L (0.49–0.54 mmol/L), from 154 mg/L to 179 mg/L (1.03–1.19 mmol/L), and from 56 mg/L to 115 mg/L (0.37–0.77 mmol/L. Symptomatic patients were more likely to receive a second blood test or acetylcysteine while awaiting investigations. Of 19 patients administered acetylcysteine, it was discontinued in five due to low paracetamol serum concentrations. All patients recovered.Guidelines were followed in >90% of patients and this testing regimen shortened length of stay. Based on these data, Australian treatment guidelines now recommend repeat testing for 2 h paracetamol serum concentrations >100 mg/L (0.67 mmol/L).A paracetamol serum concentration between 2 h and 4 h post-ingestion in children <6 years-old with unintentional poisonings of paracetamol liquid can facilitate medical discharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]