Search

Introduction: We aimed to develop and compare the utility of an automated registry of all patients undergoing surveillance for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) during the severe acute respiratory virus coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Methods: We populated an electronic register of all patients undergoing bladder tumour surveillance (July–September 2019). The computerised 'traffic-light' system was implemented in September 2019 marking the beginning of phase 2. The register was audited at two- and six-months intervals during phase 2 (November 2019 and April 2020). Audit of the system In April 2020 allowed review of care given during the peak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Ireland. The primary outcome variable was the number of patients who had delayed surveillance cystoscopy in each group. Results: A total of 278 cases were reviewed, 96 in the first cohort and 91 at both intervals of second phase. During the first phase of the audit 17 patients (17.7%) had a missed cystoscopy. Phase 2 showed a sustained decrease in the number of patients with missed surveillance, with eight (8.8%) missing their procedure in both the November and April (SARS-CoV-2) cohorts (17 v. 8, X2 = 10.76, p = 0.0004). Overall, most patients had their procedure done within the recommended time interval (245, 88%). Conclusion: A centralised accessible computerised registry of patients with NMIBC undergoing surveillance is superior to traditional manual surveillance methods, especially during the period of SARS-CoV-2. Going forward we aim to have all patients undergo surveillance within schedule with a long-term goal of a centralised national registry. Level of evidence: Level 2c: "Outcomes Research". [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Female bladder outlet obstruction (fBOO) is a relatively uncommon condition compared with its male counterpart. Several criteria have been proposed to define fBOO, but the comparative diagnostic accuracy of these remains uncertain., Objective: To identify and compare different tests to diagnose fBOO through a systematic review process., Evidence Acquisition: A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. The EMBASE/MEDLINE/Cochrane databases were searched up to August 4, 2020. Studies on women ≥18 yr of age with suspected bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) involving diagnostic tests were included. Pressure-flow studies or fluoroscopy was used as the reference standard where possible. Two reviewers independently screened all articles, searched reference lists of retrieved articles, and performed data extraction. The risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2)., Evidence Synthesis: Overall, 28 nonrandomised studies involving 10 248 patients were included in the qualitative analysis. There was significant heterogeneity regarding the characteristics of women included in BOO cohorts (ie, mixed cohorts including both anatomical and functional BOO). Pressure-flow studies ± fluoroscopy was evaluated in 25 studies. Transperineal Doppler ultrasound was used to evaluate bladder neck dynamics in two studies. One study tested the efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound. The urodynamic definition of fBOO also varied amongst studies with different parameters and thresholds used, which precluded a meta-analysis. Three studies derived nomograms using the maximum flow rate (Q max ) and voiding detrusor pressure at Q max . The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy ranges were 54.6-92.5%, 64.6-93.9%, and 64.1-92.2%, respectively., Conclusions: The available evidence on diagnostic tests for fBOO is limited and heterogeneous. Pressure-flow studies ± fluoroscopy remains the current standard for diagnosing fBOO., Patient Summary: Evidence on tests used to diagnose female bladder outlet obstruction was reviewed. The most common test used was pressure-flow studies ± fluoroscopy, which remains the current standard for diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in women. TAKE  HOME MESSAGE: The available evidence on diagnostic tests for female bladder outlet obstruction is limited and heterogeneous. The most common test used was video-urodynamics, which remains the current standard for diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in women., (Copyright © 2021 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Urethral catheterisation (UC) is a frequently performed medical procedure and catheter-related injuries can lead to significant morbidity for patients. The aims of this study are to assess interns' exposure to UC and to design, implement and assess a structured UC skills workshop for hospital interns., Methods: A 10-item anonymous questionnaire on UC was distributed to interns in two university teaching hospitals. Respondents were invited to participate in a skills workshop. Teaching methods for correct UC technique included a lecture, a video tutorial and a simulated patient model. Participants' catheter insertion skills were assessed using a 20-item OSCE checklist when the UC workshop concluded., Results: In total, 40 interns completed the initial questionnaire of whom 26 (65%) had not received any dedicated catheter skills training prior to commencing internship. Fourteen (35%) were unsupervised during their first UC. Fifteen (37%) interns attended the dedicated skills workshop. All interns found the workshop beneficial and 12 (80%) reported an improvement on confidence afterwards. Following the workshop, the mean (± standard deviation) catheter insertion OSCE score was 92% (± 14.1)., Conclusions: Interns have a lack of knowledge, experience and confidence with catheter insertion. Current training models are deficient. The introduction of a structured skills workshop may help to improve catheter insertion skills among interns.