Search

Background: Postoperative pain often remains troublesome for the patients, if not adequately managed. Various modalities have been tried to keep the patient pain free. Regional nerve blocks under ultrasound guidance have recently gained much popularity. We aimed to compare the pain relief outcomes after hip replacement surgery by continuous Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG Block) in combination with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block under the guidance of ultrasound versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCA). Methodology: Sixty patients, who underwent hip surgery at E University Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam, from August 2021 to August 2022, were randomly allocated to one of the two groups: group of patients with pain relief with PENG block in combination with LFCN block (PENG group) and the group of patients with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCA group). Outcomes regarding clinical parameters and pain scores on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), from the initiation of the blocks or the PCA (H0) to 72 h (H72) were recorded and compared. Results: Sixty patients were included in this study. The average VAS scores at rest in both groups was at low pain level (VAS < 4). The average VAS score in both of the groups at most of the time of the study did not have a statistically significant difference. The VAS on movement at the time points H18, H21, H24, H30, H36, H48, H72 of the PENG group was lower than that of the PCA group and the difference was statistically significant between the two groups (P < 0.05). The rate of vomiting/nausea of patients in the PCA group was significantly higher than in the PENG group (P = 0.006). Conclusion: Pericapsular nerve block combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block offers prolonged pain relief when compared with traditional patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in postoperative pain relief after hip replacement, and is associated with lower frequency of vomiting/nausea. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the effectivity and safety of totally endoscopic cardiac surgery without robotic assistance for atrial septal defect (ASD) closure on beating hearts., Methods: Twenty-five patients (adults/children: 15/10) underwent ASD closure using nonrobotically assisted totally endoscopic approach on beating heart. Three 5-mm trocars and one 12-mm trocar were used, only the superior vena cava is snared, filling the pleural and pericardial cavities with CO2, and the heart was beating during the surgery. Twenty-three patients had isolated secundum ASD (2 of which had severe tricuspid regurgitation) and two patients had ASD combined with partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection. All ASDs were closed using artificial patch, continuous suture; tricuspid regurgitations were repaired and the anomalous pulmonary veins were drained to the left atrium., Results: No postoperative complications or deaths occurred. Mean ± SD operation time and mean cardiopulmonary bypass time were 267.2 ± 44.6 and 156.1 ± 33.6 min, respectively. These patients were extubated within the first 5 hours, and the volume of blood drainage on the first day was less than 80 mL. Four days after surgery, patients did not need analgesics and were able to return to normal activities 1 week postoperatively., Conclusions: Totally endoscopic operation for ASD closure on beating heart is safe, with short recovery period, and surgical scars are of high cosmetic value, especially in a woman and girl.