Search

The use of first-line drugs in clinical practice for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is limited by their adverse effects. Many novel monoamine reuptake inhibitors (MRIs) with better safety profiles and comparable efficacy are also being tried for ADHD. This network meta-analysis (NMA) has evaluated the efficacy and safety of MRIs in ADHD. The data was extracted from 31 relevant clinical trials after a literature search on MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane databases, and clinical trial registries. Quality assessment was performed using the risk of bias assessment tool (RoB2) by Cochrane Collaboration, and the random-effects model was used to estimate the effect size. Standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% credible interval(95%CrI) were reported for the reduction in ADHD rating scale score. Network geometry was visualised, and node splitting was done for the closed triangles. Meta-regression was done for the duration of therapy. PRISMA-NMA guidelines were followed in selecting, analyzing, and reporting findings. The drugs showing significant reduction on the ADHD rating scale as compared to placebo are bupropion (SMD: 0.33; 95%CrI: 0.60,-0.059), dasotraline(SMD: 0.49; 95%CrI: 0.82,-0.16), venlafaxine(SMD: 0.71; 95%CrI: 1.3,-0.15), viloxazine(SMD: 0.45; 95%CrI: 0.77,-0.12). Other drugs (centanafadine, duloxetine, edivoxetine, reboxetine, tipepidine, vortioxetine) were no better than placebo in reducing symptom severity of ADHD. The efficacy of none of the drugs was found to be significantly different as compared to methylphenidate. Among all, duloxetine (OR:15; 95%CrI:1.8130) showed significantly more treatment-emergent adverse events than methylphenidate. In conclusion, venlafaxine, viloxazine, and bupropion are the most efficacious MRIs for ADHD symptom reduction as compared to placebo with high certainty of evidence., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Adrenergic neurotransmitter reuptake inhibitors are gaining attention in treatment for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Due to their effects on norepinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin neurotransmission, they benefit both ADHD and comorbid disorders and have some other advantages including longer duration of action and fewer adverse effects compared to stimulants. There is continued interest in these agents with novel mechanisms of action in treatment of ADHD., Areas Covered: The authors conducted a PubMed literature search using the following key words: 'ADHD' AND 'adrenergic reuptake inhibitors' OR 'nonstimulants' OR 'atomoxetine' OR 'Viloxazine' OR 'Dasotraline' OR 'Centanafadine' OR 'PDC-1421' OR 'Reboxetine' OR 'Edivoxetine' OR 'Bupropion' OR 'Venlafaxine' OR 'Duloxetine.' They reviewed FDA fact sheets of available medications for safety/tolerability studies and reviewed published clinical studies of these medications for treatment of ADHD., Expert Opinion: Adrenergic neurotransmitter reuptake inhibitors fit the diverse needs of children and adolescents with ADHD with 1) poor tolerability to stimulants (e.g. due to growth suppression, insomnia, rebound irritability, co-morbid depression, anxiety and tic disorders, substance abuse or diversion concerns), 2) cardiac risks, and/or 3) need for extended duration of action. Their differences in receptor affinities and modulating effects support the unique benefits of individual agents.

Serotonergic medications are used for the prevention and treatment of depression during pregnancy. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) can cause poor neonatal adaptation, which has been attributed to withdrawal versus toxicity. Bupropion, a norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitor, is often used as an adjunctive agent to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or SNRIs for refractory depression. Quetiapine, an atypical antipsychotic, may also be used in more complex cases. When combined with serotonergic drugs, bupropion and quetiapine are associated with increased risk of serotonin syndrome in adults. We describe a neonate exposed to venlafaxine (an SNRI), bupropion, and quetiapine in utero who presented nearly immediately after birth with encephalopathy and abnormal movements. The severity and rapidity of symptoms may be attributable to potentiation of venlafaxine's serotonergic effects by bupropion and quetiapine. Neonatal providers should be aware of maternal medications and prepare for possible adverse effects, particularly from common psychotropic exposures., Competing Interests: POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)

Solriamfetol (JZP-110), a selective dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with wake-promoting effects, is renally excreted ∼90% unchanged within 48 hours. Effects of renal impairment and hemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics and safety of 75-mg single-dose solriamfetol were evaluated in adults with normal renal function (n = 6); mild (n = 6), moderate (n = 6), or severe (n = 6) renal impairment; and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with and without hemodialysis (n = 7). Relative to normal renal function, geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity increased 53%, 129%, and 339%, and mean half-life was 1.2-, 1.9-, and 3.9-fold higher with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively. Renal excretion of unchanged solriamfetol over 48 hours was 85.8%, 80.0%, 66.4%, and 57.1% in normal, mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment groups, respectively; mean maximum concentration and time to maximum concentration did not vary substantially. Decreases in solriamfetol clearance were proportional to decreases in estimated glomerular filtration rate. Geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to time of last quantifiable concentration increased 357% and 518% vs normal in ESRD with and without hemodialysis, respectively, with half-life >100 hours in both groups. Over the 4-hour hemodialysis period, ∼21% of solriamfetol dose was removed. Adverse events included headache (n = 1) and nausea (n = 1). Six days after dosing, 1 participant had increased alanine and aspartate aminotransferase, leading to study discontinuation. While these adverse events were deemed study-drug related, they were mild and resolved. Results from this study combined with population pharmacokinetic modeling/simulation suggest that solriamfetol dosage adjustments are necessary in patients with moderate or severe but not with mild renal impairment. Due to significant exposure increase/prolonged half-life, dosing is not recommended in patients with ESRD., (© 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Solriamfetol (Sunosi™) is an orally active, selective dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor that was recently approved in the USA as a treatment for excessive daytime sleepiness (hypersomnia) associated with narcolepsy and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Norepinephrine and dopamine influence various physiologic functions, including sleep-wake regulation, and excessive sleepiness has been linked with dysregulation of dopaminergic and norepinephrine systems. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of solriamfetol leading to this first approval as a treatment for excessive daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy and OSA.

Background: Suicidal ideations, suicide attempts, and fatal suicides are rare adverse drug reactions to antidepressant drugs, but they essentially are clinically relevant. Drawing on a larger dataset of the European drug surveillance program, the present naturalistic study updates a previous contribution (Stübner et al., 2010)., Methods: First an analysis of the comprehensive data collected in 81 psychiatric hospitals from 1993 to 2014 by the European drug surveillance program Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie was made. All documented single cases of suicidal ideations or behavior judged as adverse drug reactions to antidepressant drugs were carefully assessed as to their clinical features and drug prescriptions., Results: Among 219,635 adult hospitalized patients taking antidepressant drugs under surveillance, 83 cases of suicidal adverse drug reactions occurred (0.04%): 44 cases of suicidal ideation, 34 attempted suicides, and 5 committed suicides were documented. Restlessness was present in 42 patients, ego-dystonic intrusive suicidal thoughts or urges in 39 patients, impulsiveness in 22 patients, and psychosis in 7 patients. Almost all adverse drug reactions occurred shortly after beginning antidepressant drug medication or increasing the dosage. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors caused a higher incidence of suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior as adverse drug reactions than noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants or tricyclic antidepressants, as did monotherapy consisting of one antidepressant drug, compared to combination treatments., Conclusions: The study supports the view that antidepressant drug-triggered suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior (primarily with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) are rare. Special clinical features (restlessness, ego-dystonic thoughts or urges, impulsiveness) may be considered as possible warning signs. A combination therapy might be preferable to antidepressant drug monotherapy when beginning treatment.

Background: The reproductive safety of selective reuptake inhibitor (SRI) antidepressants needs to be established to provide optimal control of maternal depression while protecting the fetus., Objective: To define a child's neurodevelopment following prenatal exposure to SRIs and to account for genetic and environmental confounders in a sibling design using the Toronto Motherisk prospective database., Method: Intelligence and behavior of siblings prenatally exposed and unexposed to SRIs were assessed by using the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Third Edition, Child Behavior Checklist, and Conners Parent Rating Scale-Revised and subsequently compared. Mothers, diagnosed with depression using DSM-IV, were assessed for intelligence quotient (IQ) and for severity of depressive symptoms with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale. Prenatal drug doses and durations of exposure, child's age, child's sex, birth order, severity of maternal depression symptoms, and Full Scale IQ, the primary outcome measure, of both the mother and the child were considered in the analyses., Results: Forty-five sibling pairs (ages 3 years to 6 years 11 months, prenatally exposed and unexposed to SRIs) did not differ in their mean ± SD Full Scale IQs (103 ± 13 vs 106 ± 12; P = .30; 95% CI, -7.06 to 2.21) or rates of problematic behaviors. Significant predictor of children's intelligence was maternal IQ (P = .043, β = 0.306). Severity of maternal depression was a significant predictor of Child Behavior Checklist Internalizing (P = .019, β = 0.366), Externalizing (P = .003, β = 0.457), and Total scores (P = .001, β = 0.494). Drug doses and durations of exposure during pregnancy did not predict any outcomes of interest in the exposed siblings., Conclusions: SRI antidepressants were not found to be neurotoxic. Maternal depression may risk the child's future psychopathology. The sibling design in behavioral teratology aids in separating the effects of maternal depression from those of SRIs, providing stronger evidence in clinical decision-making., (© Copyright 2015 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Objective: To assess short-term efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d versus placebo for treating major depressive disorder (MDD). Assessment of sexual function was a secondary objective., Method: Outpatients (≥ 18 years) who met criteria for MDD from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision and had screening and baseline 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) total scores ≥ 20 were randomly assigned to placebo or desvenlafaxine 50 or 100 mg/d in an 8-week study conducted from October 2011 to August 2012. The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline in HDRS17 total score at week 8, analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Sexual function was assessed using the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX)., Results: The safety population included 909 patients (intent-to-treat population, n = 886). Significantly greater improvement in adjusted mean HDRS17 total score from baseline to week 8 was observed for desvenlafaxine 50 mg (-11.28; P = .006) and desvenlafaxine 100 mg (-11.67; P < .001) compared with placebo (-9.71), with adjustment for multiplicity. In the ASEX total score analysis (n = 422), the treatment by gender interaction was not significant; thus, genders were combined for subsequent analyses. Comparisons for desvenlafaxine versus placebo for change from baseline in ASEX total and all item scores found P > .05, with no adjustment for multiplicity. Rates of sexual dysfunction based on ASEX were comparable among treatment groups., Conclusions: These results support previous findings demonstrating antidepressant efficacy, safety, and tolerability of desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d versus placebo. Sexual function was comparable between desvenlafaxine and placebo., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01432457., (© Copyright 2015 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Rationale: BMS-820836 is a novel antidepressant that selectively inhibits the reuptake of serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine., Objective: This Phase I study assessed safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of multiple daily doses of BMS-820836 in healthy subjects. Central serotonin transporter (SERT) and dopamine transporter (DAT) occupancy were assessed using positron emission tomography and [(11)C]MADAM or [(11)C]PE2I, respectively., Methods: Fifty-seven healthy volunteers were enrolled in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending multiple-dose study (ClincalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00892840). Eight participants in seven dose cohorts received oral doses of BMS-820836 (0.1-4 mg) or placebo for 14 days to assess safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. Additionally, SERT and DAT occupancies were evaluated in 4-8 subjects per cohort at 8 h post-dose on Day 10 and 24 h post-dose on Day 15 at anticipated steady-state conditions., Results: Most adverse events were mild to moderate; there were no serious safety concerns. Median maximum concentrations of BMS-820836 were observed at 4.0-5.5 h post-dose; estimated elimination half-life was 44-74 h. About 80 % striatal SERT occupancy was achieved after multiple doses of 0.5 mg BMS-820836 at both 8 and 24 h post-dose. Striatal DAT occupancy ranged between 14 % and 35 % at 8 h post-dose with a slight decline at 24 h post-dose., Conclusions: Multiple daily doses of up to 4 mg BMS-820836 appeared to be generally safe and well tolerated in a healthy population. SERT and DAT occupancies were in a range associated with therapeutic efficacy of antidepressants. Together with the pharmacokinetic profile of BMS-820836, the occupancy data support once-daily administration.

Background: This study sought to investigate the efficacy of duloxetine for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (DSM-IV)., Methods: Twenty individuals were enrolled in a 17-week, open-label trial of duloxetine at Massachusetts General Hospital. Data were collected between March 2007 and September 2012. Study measures assessing obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms, quality of life, depression, and anxiety were administered at baseline and weeks 1, 5, 9, 13, and 17. The primary outcome measures were the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale and Clinical Global Improvement scale., Results: For the 12 study completers, pre- and posttreatment analyses revealed significant improvements (P<.05) on clinician- and self-rated measures of obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms and quality of life. Among the 12 completers, more than one-half (n=7) satisfied full medication response criteria. Intention-to-treat analyses (n=20) showed similar improvements (P<.05) on primary and secondary study outcome measures., Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that duloxetine may provide a significant reduction in symptoms for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00464698; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00464698?term=NCT00464698&rank=1., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP.)

We carried out a secondary analysis of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of desvenlafaxine for major depressive disorder (MDD) to explore the associations between depressive symptoms and subtypes, and functional outcomes, including work functioning. Employed outpatients with MDD were assigned randomly in a 2 : 1 ratio to receive desvenlafaxine 50 mg/day or placebo for 12 weeks. Analyses were carried out post-hoc with the intent-to-treat (ITT) sample (N=427) and a prospectively defined modified ITT sample (N=310), composed of patients with baseline 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score of at least 20. Functional outcomes at week 12 included items and factors from the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Sheehan Disability Scale, and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire. In the modified ITT sample, but not in the ITT sample, desvenlafaxine-treated patients showed significantly greater improvement in several functional outcomes in the responder, nonanxious, and normal-energy patient subgroups. Improvement in the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total score at week 2 predicted change at week 12 in several functional outcomes. Functional improvement at 12 weeks was greater in subgroups of patients and was also significantly predicted by early improvement in depressive symptoms in employed patients with MDD treated with desvenlafaxine.

Though GABA is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain, involved in a wide variety of brain functions and many neuropsychiatric disorders, its intracellular and metabolic presence provides uncertainty in the interpretation of the GABA signal measured by (1)H-MRS. Previous studies demonstrating the sensitivity of this technique to pharmacological manipulations of GABA have used nonspecific challenges that make it difficult to infer the exact source of the changes. In this study, the synaptic GABA reuptake inhibitor tiagabine, which selectively blocks GAT1, was used to test the sensitivity of J-difference edited (1)H-MRS to changes in extracellular GABA concentrations. MEGA-PRESS was used to obtain GABA-edited spectra in 10 male individuals, before and after a 15-mg oral dose of tiagabine. In the three voxels measured, no significant changes were found in GABA+ concentration after the challenge compared to baseline. This dose of tiagabine is known to modulate synaptic GABA and neurotransmission through studies using other imaging modalities, and significant increases in self-reported sleepiness scales were observed. Therefore, it is concluded that recompartmentalization of GABA through transport block does not have a significant impact on total GABA concentration. Furthermore, it is likely that the majority of the magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)-derived GABA signal is intracellular. It should be considered, in individual interpretation of GABA MRS studies, whether it is appropriate to attribute observed effects to changes in neurotransmission., (© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: During perimenopause, vasomotor symptoms are known to have a detrimental effect on women's functional ability and quality of life. For symptomatic women not eligible for hormonal therapy, desvenlafaxine is an option, but its safety margin and tolerability are not yet determined., Methods: A computer-based literature search was done in the databases of MEDLINE, Cochrane library, and HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative). Meta-analysis was conducted by including double-blind randomized controlled studies on the effectiveness and safety of desvenlafaxine in the treatment of hot flashes. The effectiveness, safety and tolerability of desvenlafaxine were determined by standardized mean differences (SMDs) and Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio. Subgroup analysis based on doses of desvenlafaxine and linear meta-regression analyses were performed for several covariates. Heterogeneity testing, the risk of bias assessment and sensitivity analyses were done., Results: Desvenlafaxine was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the number and severity of daily moderate to severe hot flashes. The number of nighttime awakenings because of hot flashes was also significantly decreased. However, the rate of desvenlafaxine treatment discontinuation because of adverse events was a significantly higher than placebo treated women and the risk ratios of adverse events like asthenia, hypertension, anorexia, constipation, diarrhea, dry mouth, nausea, dizziness, insomnia, somnolence and mydriasis were very high., Conclusion: Desvenlafaxine is effective in the treatment of hot flashes but it is strongly associated with several adverse events and treatment discontinuation. Further clinical trials focusing only on desvenlafaxine related adverse events are highly warranted before it is approved for public use.

Rationale: BMS-820836, a novel triple monoamine reuptake inhibitor, is an experimental monotherapy for sufferers of major depressive disorder who have had an inadequate response to an existing antidepressant treatment., Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and serotonin transporter (SERT) and dopamine transporter (DAT) occupancy for single doses of BMS-820836 in healthy subjects., Methods: Healthy subjects were assigned to seven BMS-820836 dose panels (0.025, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 5 mg; n = 8 each), in which subjects were randomly allocated 3:1 to a single BMS-820836 dose or matched placebo. Serial blood samples were collected on Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 14 to characterize the PK of BMS-820836. Following evaluation of the maximum tolerated dose, SERT occupancy was determined by applying [(11)C]DASB positron emission tomography (PET) after single-dose BMS-820836 (0.5 or 3 mg; n = 3 each) and DAT occupancy by applying [(11)C]PE2I PET after single-dose BMS-820836 (3 mg; n = 6)., Results: Single oral doses of BMS-820836 (0.025-3 mg) were generally safe and well tolerated. BMS-820836 had a median T max of 5.0-7.2 h and a mean apparent terminal T 1/2 of 34-57 h. Mean striatal SERT occupancies were 19 ± 9 % and 82 ± 8 % after single doses of 0.5 and 3 mg BMS-820836, respectively. The mean striatal DAT occupancy was 19 ± 9 % after a single 3 mg BMS-820836 dose., Conclusions: Single doses of BMS-820836 have meaningful SERT and DAT occupancy and demonstrate an acceptable safety and tolerability profile in healthy control subjects.

Objective: Cognitive impairment is integral to many neurological illnesses. Specific enhancement of glutamatergic transmission may improve memory and learning. Org 25935 increases the synaptic availability of glycine, an obligate co-agonist with glutamate at N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. We hypothesised that Org 25935 would acutely improve the learning and memory of healthy volunteers., Methods: A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, single-dose study of Org 25935 and placebo was carried out. Thirty-two healthy male volunteers took either 12-mg Org 25935 or matching placebo and were later assessed with the manikin task, digit span and verbal memory tests. Systematic assessments of cardiovascular and adverse events were also taken., Results: There was no effect of Org 25935 on reaction time, number of correct responses or learning (greater or slower improvement over successive tasks) compared with placebo. Org 25935 caused significantly more dizziness and drowsiness compared with placebo; these side effects were mainly mild., Conclusions: A single dose of Org 25935 does not improve learning or memory in healthy male individuals. However, the drug was well tolerated, and it remains to be seen whether it would have a positive effect on cognition in patient groups with pre-existing cognitive deficits.

Introduction: The dysfunctions of three very important monoamine neurotransmitters, serotonin (5-HT), norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA), are associated with some of important CNS diseases such as depression; developing the triple reuptake inhibitors (TRIs) that can rebalance 5-HT, NE and DA through the inhibition of the monoamine reuptake transporters will lead to a more effective and safer antidepressant., Areas Covered: This article reviews past 7 years' advances in the development of TRIs; a patent review (2006 - 2012), covering the discovery of new chemical entities, and development status of leading TRI clinical candidates., Expert Opinion: The development of TRIs has several challenges, including discovering a "single" agent that has the activities against all three monoamine reuptake transporters SERT, NET and DAT. More important is that the agent must have a "right ratio" to be safer and better tolerated for the treatment of depression. The TRIs can potentially be used for the treatment of other CNS diseases, such as pain, Parkinson's and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depending on ratios of SERT, NET and DAT.

Depression during pregnancy and in the post partum period is a significant health issue in modern society. The estimated prevalence of depression in pregnancy ranges from 13-20%. The major dilemma for gynecologists is to treat or not to treat depression during gestation and lactation. Consequences of untreated depression can be so serious that the benefit of antidepressant therapy may overweigh the possible risk for injury of fetal/neonatal development. Currently, selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are commonly used for treatment of maternal depression. The review article brings up-to-date knowledge on effects of maternal adversity (depression) and/or antidepressants on the development of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis of the offspring in relation to postnatal behavior and reactivity to stressful stimuli. Treated as well as untreated maternal depression presents a risk for the developing fetus and neonate. The authors stress the need to evaluate the relative safety of SNRIs/SNRIs by means of relevant experimental models to assess if these drugs can be assigned to treat pregnant and lactating depressive women.

Evidence suggests that acute exposure to (+/-)3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) produces qualitatively similar effects on recognition task performance as other stimulant-type drugs. The current study examined whether there was a similar neurochemical basis to these memory effects by examining the effects of a D1 receptor antagonist (SCH23390) and D2 antagonist (eticlopride) on MDMA- or cocaine-induced impairments in delayed matching-to-sample performance in rats. At low doses it was shown that eticlopride was ineffective in antagonizing either MDMA or cocaine's effects, and at higher doses exacerbated their effects. In contrast, the D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 was only able to significantly attenuate the disruption caused by MDMA, but not cocaine's effects. Therefore, although present evidence suggests that the effect of acute MDMA on memory-task performance may be related to its effects at D1 receptor sites, there may be differences between MDMA and cocaine in the precise neurochemical pathways involved despite their having similar cognitive effects., (© 2011 The Author, Addiction Biology © 2011 Society for the Study of Addiction.)

The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety of desvenlafaxine for continuation treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in Japanese patients. This was a phase 3, multicenter, 10-month, open-label study with flexible dosing of desvenlafaxine (25, 50, 100 mg/day). Japanese patients with MDD who had completed an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which patients received 25 or 50 mg/day desvenlafaxine or placebo were enrolled. In this study, patients received desvenlafaxine 25 mg/day from days 1 to 14, with subsequent upward titration, to a maximum of 100 mg/day, determined by clinical response. Of 304 patients, 75 (24.7%) discontinued during the on-therapy period; patient request was the most common reason (11.5%). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 240 patients (78.9%) during the on-therapy period; the most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis (37.2%), somnolence (11.5%), headache (10.5%), and nausea (10.2%). For the ITT-LOCF population, the mean change from baseline in the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D₁₇) total score was -4.76 (95% confidence interval: -5.47 to -4.05); continued numerical improvements in the HAM-D₁₇ total scores and other depression outcome measures were observed irrespective of treatment in the previous study. Long-term use of desvenlafaxine was safe and well tolerated, with a clinical benefit/risk profile similar to that in other populations.

Background: Many antidepressants are extensively metabolized in the liver, requiring dose adjustments in individuals with hepatic impairment. Clinical studies indicate that the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor desvenlafaxine is metabolized primarily via glucuronidation, and ∼45% is eliminated unchanged in urine., Objective: The objectives of this study were to assess the pharmacokinetic profile, safety, and tolerability of desvenlafaxine in adults with chronic Child-Pugh class A, B, and C hepatic impairment., Methods: Subjects (aged 18-65 years) with mild (Child-Pugh class A, n = 8), moderate (Child-Pugh class B, n = 8), and severe (Child-Pugh class C, n = 8) hepatic impairment and 12 healthy matched subjects received a single 100-mg oral dose of desvenlafaxine. Disposition of (R)-, (S)-, and (R+S)-enantiomers of desvenlafaxine were examined in plasma and urine. Geometric least squares (GLS) mean ratios and 90% CIs for AUC, AUC0-τ, Cmax, and Cl/F were calculated; comparisons were made by using a 1-factor ANOVA. Safety was evaluated according to adverse events, physical examination, vital signs, and laboratory assessments., Results: Healthy participants had a mean age of 51 years (range, 36-62 years) and weight of 79.1 kg (range, 52.5-105.0 kg); hepatically impaired participants had a mean age of 52 years (range, 31-65 years) and weight of 80.9 kg (range, 50.2-119.5 kg). In both groups, 67% of participants were male. No statistically significant differences (≥50%) in the disposition of desvenlafaxine were detected between hepatically impaired patients and healthy subjects based on GLS mean ratios for Cmax, AUC0-τ, AUC, or Cl/F (P > 0.05 for each comparison). Median Tmax was similar for all groups (range, 6-9 hours). A nonsignificant increase was observed for desvenlafaxine exposure in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment (GLS mean ratios [90% CIs] for AUC, 31% [93.2-184], 35% [96.5-190], respectively). The most common adverse events were nausea (n = 2, healthy subjects; n = 3, hepatically impaired subjects) and vomiting (n = 1, healthy subjects; n = 2, hepatically impaired subjects)., Conclusions: A single 100-mg dose of desvenlafaxine was well tolerated in healthy subjects and hepatically impaired patients. A mild increase in exposure was observed for moderate and severe hepatically impaired subjects (Child-Pugh class B and C)., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The results of two single-center, two-period, open-label trials that evaluated the effects of multiple doses of desvenlafaxine on the pharmacokinetics of desipramine, a cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 enzyme substrate, are presented. Healthy individuals aged 18-45 years were administered a single oral dose of 50 mg desipramine with and without 100 mg daily (n=34) or 400 mg daily (n=23) desvenlafaxine for 5 days. After coadministration of 100 mg desvenlafaxine, desipramine exposure, measured by peak plasma concentration (C(max)) and total area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC), showed minimal increases of 25 and 17%, respectively; coadministration of 400 mg desvenlafaxine resulted in a 52% increase in desipramine C(max) and a 90% increase in AUC. For the 100 mg dose, the geometric least squares mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for desipramine AUC (117%; 90% CI 110-125%), 2-hydroxydesipramine AUC (114%; 90% CI 110-119%), and C(max) (110%; 90% CI 104-116%) were all within the 80-125% interval, showing the bioequivalence for AUC between desipramine administered alone and in combination with 100 mg desvenlafaxine. These results indicate that desvenlafaxine is a relatively weak inhibitor of CYP2D6 and that desvenlafaxine 100 mg, twice the recommended therapeutic dose of 50 mg, is unlikely to cause drug-drug interactions with CYP2D6 substrates.

Objective: Many studies have provided evidence for the loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEP) as a marker for central serotonergic activity but remained inconclusive for its suitability in clinical use., Methods: A cross-sectional sample of 162 psychiatric inpatients (major depression N = 86, bipolar disorder N = 12, schizophrenia N = 50, and schizoaffective disorder N = 14) and 40 healthy subjects was retrospectively examined for LDAEP and effects of psychopathology and psychopharmacology., Results: The LDAEP was weaker in patients with affective disorders than in healthy subjects but did not differentiate between the total patient sample and healthy controls. LDAEP correlated significantly with dimensions of the Brief Symptom Inventory in the total patient sample (depression, paranoid ideation, psychoticism, Global Symptom Index, and Positive Symptom Distress Index), in patients with affective disorders (depression) and with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (depression, psychoticism, Global Symptom Index, and Positive Symptom Distress Index). Similar correlations were found in depressed patients with a single noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. There was a negative correlation between dosage of typical antipsychotics and LDAEP. Hypnotics generally led to a lower LDAEP., Conclusion: The LDAEP in patients is related to severity of psychopathologic syndromes irrespective of diagnosis. Chronic psychopharmacologic treatment may also differentially modulate the LDAEP, but longitudinal studies are needed.

GSK372475 is a triple reuptake inhibitor with approximately equipotent inhibition of serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine transporters. Two randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind studies examined the efficacy and safety of GSK372475 in outpatients (aged 18-64 years) with a diagnosis of major depressive episode associated with major depressive disorder (MDD). Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, GSK372475 (1-2 mg/d), or active control (Study 1: venlafaxine XR 150-225 mg/d; Study 2: paroxetine 20-30 mg/d). GSK372475 did not significantly differ from placebo on any of the key efficacy endpoints (six-item Bech scale, IDS-Clinician Rated, MADRS) in either study. Both active controls demonstrated significant antidepressant activity compared with placebo on both primary and secondary endpoints. The most common adverse effects (AEs) with GSK372475 were dry mouth, headache, insomnia, and nausea. AEs were more frequent for GSK372475 versus placebo for sleep, anxiety-related, gastrointestinal, and tachycardia events. Increases in mean change from baseline in heart rate and sitting blood pressure were greater for GSK372475 than observed for either placebo or active control groups. Completion rates were lower for GSK372475 (49%, 58%) compared with placebo (67%, 74%), venlafaxine XR (63%), or paroxetine (77%). GSK372475 was neither efficacious nor well tolerated in patients with MDD in two 10-week studies.

Objective: To determine whether titrating up and tapering down of desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) improves its tolerability in postmenopausal women with vasomotor symptoms (VMS)., Methods: In the 1-week titration phase, participants received desvenlafaxine 100 mg/d (no titration), desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d, desvenlafaxine 25 mg/d (4 days) then 50 mg/d (3 days), or desvenlafaxine 25 mg/d. Participants then received open-label desvenlafaxine 100 mg/d for 15 weeks. In the 2-week taper phase, participants received placebo, desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d then placebo (7 days each), desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d then 25 mg/d (7 days each), or desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d every other day. Primary endpoints included nausea incidence during the first 2 weeks of treatment and Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Checklist total scores after taper weeks 1 and 2., Results: Nausea incidence was significantly lower for the desvenlafaxine 25 mg/d (19%) and 50 mg/d (22.6%) titration regimens vs. no titration (35.2%; p=0.004 and p=0.035, respectively). At taper week 1, mean DESS scores were significantly lower for desvenlafaxine 50 mg every other day (2.26, p<0.001), 50/25 mg/d (2.28, p<0.001), and 50 mg/d-placebo (1.84, p<0.001) taper regimens vs. no taper (7.07). At week 2, the mean DESS total score was significantly higher for the desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d-placebo regimen vs. no taper (4.46 vs. 2.44, respectively; p=0.009). Desvenlafaxine 50 mg every other day was the least tolerated of the taper regimens., Conclusions: Titration regimens may improve tolerability of desvenlafaxine 100 mg/d in postmenopausal women with VMS. Taper regimens of desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d-placebo or 50/25-mg/d, were better tolerated than abrupt discontinuation or desvenlafaxine 50 mg given every other day taper regimen.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) vs. tibolone and placebo for menopausal vasomotor symptoms and the incidence of uterine bleeding., Methods: This 12-week, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was conducted at 35 sites in Europe, two sites in South Africa, and one site in Mexico. Postmenopausal women with ≥50 moderate or severe hot flushes per week (n = 485) were randomized to desvenlafaxine 100 mg/day, tibolone 2.5 mg/day, or placebo. Reduction in the average daily number of moderate and severe hot flushes at weeks 4 and 12 (primary endpoint) was evaluated using analysis of covariance. Safety assessments included incidence of uterine bleeding, adverse events, laboratory values, and vital signs., Results: At week 12, no statistically significant difference was observed in reduction of the average daily number of moderate and severe hot flushes for desvenlafaxine (-5.78) vs. placebo (-5.82; p = 0.921), although time to 50% reduction was significantly less than placebo (13 vs. 26 days, p = 0.006). Hot flush reduction with tibolone (-8.21) was significantly greater than placebo (p < 0.001). Nausea was the most common adverse event with desvenlafaxine, was generally mild to moderate, and resolved within the first 2 weeks. Significantly more subjects experienced bleeding with tibolone (23%) vs. desvenlafaxine (12%; p < 0.024) or placebo (9%; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Desvenlafaxine did not separate from placebo in reducing the number of moderate to severe hot flushes at week 12, although it did allow women to achieve 50% reduction sooner than placebo. Tibolone did separate from placebo, but with smaller than expected effect. The placebo effect was high (57%). Adverse drug reactions were consistent with the known safety profile of desvenlafaxine, and significantly more women who received tibolone experienced episodes of bleeding compared with women who received desvenlafaxine or placebo.

Endogenous cannabinoids (eCBs) are retrograde messengers that provide feedback inhibition of both excitatory and inhibitory transmission in brain through the activation of presynaptic CB₁ receptors. Substantial evidence indicates that eCBs mediate various forms of short- and long-term plasticity in brain regions involved in the etiology of addiction. The present review provides an overview of the mechanisms through which eCBs mediate various forms of synaptic plasticity and discusses evidence that eCB-mediated plasticity is disrupted following exposure to a variety of abused substances that differ substantially in pharmacodynamic mechanism including alcohol, psychostimulants and cannabinoids. The possible involvement of dysregulated eCB signaling in maladaptive behaviors that evolve over long-term drug exposure is also discussed, with a particular focus on altered behavioral responses to drug exposure, deficient extinction of drug-related memories, increased drug craving and relapse, heightened stress sensitivity and persistent affective disruption (anxiety and depression)., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The object of this study was to evaluate the dose-dependent efficacy and tolerability of milnacipran in patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS) with inadequate response at low doses., Methods: A 12-week open-label dose-escalation study was conducted in 56 female patients (aged 20-83 years, with a mean age of 60.8 years). The initial dosage of milnacipran was 30 mg/d, and the dosage was raised up to 60 mg and 90 mg/d every 4 weeks until an improvement of at least 50% reduction of visual analog scale was achieved., Results: The mean ± SD effective daily dose of milnacipran was 63.9 ±16.7 mg. The cumulative improvement rate for the daily dose of 30 mg was 28.6%, and this rate rose (50.8%-67.9%) as the daily dose was increased (from 60 to 90 mg, respectively). The cumulative proportion of responders was significantly greater, with maximal daily doses of 60 and 90 mg, compared with that of 30 mg (P < 0.05, χ test). Most adverse events appeared at the low dose, and there was little evidence for dose-dependence of adverse effects. No serious safety issues were observed., Conclusion: From the result of this study, dose escalation of milnacipran for patients with burning mouth syndrome with inadequate response at low doses may be helpful if the 30-mg daily dose has been tolerated well.

Unlabelled: SEP-225289 is a novel compound that, based on in vitro potencies for transporter function, potentially inhibits reuptake at dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin transporters. An open-label PET study was conducted during the development of SEP-225289 to investigate its dopamine and serotonin transporter occupancy., Methods: Different single doses of SEP-225289 were administered to healthy volunteers in 3 cohorts: 8 mg (n = 7), 12 mg (n = 5), and 16 mg (n = 7). PET was performed before and approximately 24 h after oral administration of SEP-225289, to assess occupancy at trough levels. Dopamine and serotonin transporter occupancies were estimated from PET using (11)C-N-(3-iodoprop-2E-enyl)-2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-methylphenyl)nortropane ((11)C-PE2I) and (11)C-N,N-dimethyl-2-(2-amino-4-cyanophenylthio)benzylamine ((11)C-DASB), respectively. Plasma concentration of SEP-225289 was assessed before ligand injection, and subjects were monitored for adverse events., Results: Average dopamine and serotonin transporter occupancies increased with increasing doses of SEP-225289. Mean dopamine and serotonin transporter occupancies were 33% ± 11% and 2% ± 13%, respectively, for 8 mg; 44% ± 4% and 9% ± 10%, respectively, for 12 mg; and 49% ± 7% and 14% ± 15%, respectively, for 16 mg. On the basis of the relationship between occupancy and plasma concentration, dopamine transporter IC(50) (the plasma concentration of drug at 50% occupancy) was determined (4.5 ng/mL) and maximum dopamine transporter occupancy was extrapolated (85%); however, low serotonin transporter occupancy prevented similar serotonin transporter calculations. No serious adverse events were reported., Conclusion: At the doses evaluated, occupancy of the dopamine transporter was significantly higher than that of the serotonin transporter, despite similar in vitro potencies, confirming that, in addition to in vitro assays, PET occupancy studies can be instrumental to the drug development process by informing early decisions about indication, dose, and therapeutic potential.

Unlabelled: The present studies assessed the potential abuse liability and likely mechanism(s) of action of the wake-promoting agent modafinil., Methods: Experiments assessed the locomotor sensitization (LS) and discriminative stimulus (DS) properties of modafinil in mouse and rat, respectively. Comparative data were generated with a range of psychostimulants and monoamine reuptake inhibitors., Results: Repeated administration of d-amphetamine and cocaine, psychostimulants with high abuse liability, resulted in the induction and expression of LS in mice. Bupropion and caffeine, two psychostimulants not abused in humans, were not associated with LS. GBR12909 induced LS during repeated exposure, but there was no evidence of expression of LS after acute challenge following withdrawal. In contrast, repeated administration of modafinil resulted in the expression, but not induction, of LS. d-amphetamine, but not the mu-opioid agonist morphine or the nAChR agonist nicotine, fully substituted for the cocaine DS in rats. The selective dopamine transporter (DAT) inhibitor GBR12909 fully substituted, the preferential norepinephrine transporter (NET) inhibitor desipramine partially substituted, and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram failed to substitute for cocaine. Modafinil fully substituted for cocaine, similar to the mixed DAT/NET inhibitor bupropion., Conclusions: Two preclinical assays indicated potential abuse liability of modafinil; drug discrimination studies suggest DAT blockade by modafinil is a likely mechanism of action in vivo., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Although there is evidence that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors provide some benefit in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), most meta-analytical reviews have concluded that effect sizes are small and, moreover, that there may be relatively little benefit for some populations (e. g., combat veterans with co-morbid major depression, MDD). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of the dual reuptake inhibitor duloxetine in the treatment of PTSD and co-morbid MDD., Methods: Twenty-one treatment refractory, male, combat-related patients with PTSD and co-morbid MDD were enrolled in a naturalistic study and twenty completed the trial. Duloxetine was given between 60 and 120 mg daily over 8 weeks., Results: Duloxetine led to a significant improvement of PTSD-characteristic symptoms as well as co-morbid MDD. Duloxetine effectively reduced nightmares, which is important because decreasing nightmares has been associated with improved sleep in PTSD., Discussion: The results of this naturalistic study suggest that duloxetine is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with PTSD and co-morbid MDD. These initial results need to be extended to the study of women with PTSD.

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common, seriously impairing illness. Desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) is the third serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) approved in the United States for the treatment of MDD. Short-term clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of 50 to 400 mg/d doses, with no evidence that doses greater than 50 mg/d confer additional benefit., Objective: This paper summarizes published data on the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the desvenlafaxine 50-mg/d recommended therapeutic dose for MDD and discusses clinical practice considerations., Methods: A systematic review of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and PubMed (all years through June 2009) was performed using the terms desvenlafaxine, DVS, and ODV. The criteria for inclusion in the review were a double-blind design, a placebo control or active comparator group, the 50-mg desvenlafaxine dose group, and enrollment of patients with a diagnosis of MDD. Posters were included if they reported on a study that was subsequently published in a manuscript., Results: Overall results of two randomized, placebo-controlled, 8-week clinical trials demonstrated the efficacy of desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d for MDD. Statistically significant improvements compared with placebo were observed on the primary efficacy measure (17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D(17)] total score; P < 0.05). Significant differences were observed on several secondary measures (Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores in both trials [P < 0.05]; Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scores [P < or = 0.01], Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scores [P < or = 0.01], HAM-D(17) response [P < or = 0.01] and remission [P < 0.05] in one trial each). Functional outcomes measures (Sheehan Disability Scale total and World Health Organization 5-Item Well-Being Index scores) were significant in both trials (P < 0.05). Safety results indicate desvenlafaxine treatment was safe and well tolerated; findings were consistent with the SNRI class. The generalizability of these findings is limited by the study protocols, which excluded patients with unstable comorbid medical conditions and also those with other Axis 1 and 2 psychiatric illnesses. Additionally, comparisons with other SNRIs are challenging given differences in study design. Desvenlafaxine can be initiated with the 50-mg/d therapeutic dose without titration and provides efficacy with rates of discontinuation due to treatment-emergent adverse events similar to placebo. In vitro data indicate desvenlafaxine has minimal inhibitory effects on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and clinical studies show desvenlafaxine does not have a clinically relevant effect on CYP2D6 metabolism. In vitro data also indicate desvenlafaxine is not a substrate or inhibitor of the p-glycoprotein transporter. Plasma protein binding of desvenlafaxine is low (30%) and independent of drug concentration. Bioavailability is high at 80% after oral administration and is not affected by food., Conclusions: Desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d has demonstrated efficacy, safety, and tolerability for the treatment of MDD in two placebo-controlled trials. The metabolic profile of desvenlafaxine suggests a low risk of drug-drug interactions owing to minimal inhibitory effects on CYP2D6, lack of interaction with p-glycoprotein, and low protein binding.

Tesofensine, a monoamine reuptake inhibitor, is under development by NeuroSearch A/S for the potential treatment of obesity. In vitro, the compound potently blocked dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake. Initial development, which was conducted by NeuroSearch in collaboration with Boehringer Ingelheim Corp, demonstrated that although tesofensine was ineffective as a treatment for neurodegenerative conditions, a notable occurrence of unintended weight loss was observed in individuals treated with the drug. Preclinical data from diet-induced obese rats supported the hypothesis that tesofensine reduces body weight, and NeuroSearch has since pursued the development of the compound as an oral anti-obesity drug. In phase II clinical trials with tesofensine in obese individuals, dose-related reductions in body weight, body fat and waist circumference, as well as improvements in other obesity-related endocrine factors, were observed. Overall, tesofensine was associated with minor adverse events. Tesofensine caused dose-dependent elevations in heart rate, with significant increases in blood pressure at the highest dose tested. The initial positive findings suggest that tesofensine may be a well-tolerated long-term treatment for obesity, with minimal cardiovascular effects; this view appears to be shared by the FDA, which recently endorsed the phase III trial program for the agent.

A welcome move! This psychoactive agent has an unfavourable risk-benefit balance in both hot flushes and depression.

Objective: To investigate cardiac autonomic dysfunction in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Research in this area has faced several limitations because of the heterogeneity of the disease, the influence of medication, and methodological shortcomings., Methods: Participants were 75 patients suffering from an acute recurrent episode of MDD and 75 matched controls. All participants were assessed at baseline for linear and nonlinear parameters of heart rate variability, QT variability and baroreflex sensitivity. Participants with MDD were reassessed after 7 to 9 days of treatment with either a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or a serotonin and noradrenaline selective reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) antidepressant., Results: In the initial examination, patients showed an overall shift of autonomic balance toward sympathetic predominance as compared with matched controls, with a decrease in parasympathetic parameters and baroreflex sensitivity, and an increase in sympathetically influenced QT variability. Overall, antidepressant treatment exacerbated this imbalance, with differential effects observed for SSRI and SNRI treatment. In contrast to autonomic dysfunction in other disorders, such as schizophrenia, autonomic dysfunction in MDD appeared to be independent of disease severity., Conclusions: Patients suffering from MDD show profound autonomic dysfunction, which is exacerbated by SNRI and to a lesser degree by SSRI treatment. This information could prove important when selecting antidepressant medication for patients at risk for cardiac arrhythmias.

Background: There is ongoing debate about the safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and other serotonergic/noradrenergic antidepressants when used during pregnancy., Objective: This article reviews the available literature on the main safety concerns associated with the use of SSRIs and other serotonergic/noradrenergic antidepressants (serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants) during pregnancy., Methods: English-language reports of analytical and descriptive studies, including case reports, case series, and meta-analyses, were identified through searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO (1966-April 2009). The search terms were fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, Citalopram, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, venlafaxine, mirtazapine, reboxetine, duloxetine, SSRI, SNRI, NaSSA, and NRI in association with depression, pregnancy, prenatal exposure, miscarriage, spontaneous abortion, malformation, in utero exposure, and neonatal complications., Results: Paroxetine has been associated with significant risks of major malformation, particularly cardiac defects, when used during pregnancy. Significant associations between maternal exposure to SSRIs and both persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn and a self-limiting neonatal behavioral syndrome have been reported in a number of recent original studies and meta-analyses. Some studies have suggested a relationship between the use of SSRIs or other serotonergic/noradrenergic antidepressants and the occurrence of miscarriage, although these studies had methodologic limitations that affected the strength of the data. Evidence for a possible association between in utero exposure to SSRIs or other serotonergic/noradrenergic antidepressants and alterations in neurobehavioral development, bleeding, and QTc-interval prolongation is currently weak., Conclusion: The available evidence suggests that SSRIs and other serotonergic/noradrenergic antidepressants should be used with caution during pregnancy, with careful follow-up of infants exposed to these agents in utero.

Background: Desvenlafaxine succinate, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in February 2008 for the treatment of adult patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Desvenlafaxine is the third SNRI approved by the FDA for this indication., Objective: This article reviews the available information for desvenlafaxine, focusing on its pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety profile., Methods: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE (1950-March 2009), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-March 2009), ISI Web of Knowledge (1996-March 2009), and EMBASE (1974-March 2009) was conducted using the terms desvenlafaxine, O-desmethylvenlafaxine, and Pristiq. Reference lists of articles were reviewed for other relevant publications. Abstracts of unpublished clinical studies presented at the American Psychiatric Association annual meetings (2004-2008) were included in the review; also included were data from the FDA and the European Medicines Agency Web sites., Results: After oral administration, desvenlafaxine reaches T(max) in 7 to 8 hours and is slowly eliminated, with t((1/2)) values of 9 to 15 hours. With once-daily dosing, steady-state plasma concentrations are achieved within 4 to 5 days. Alternate-day dosing should be implemented in patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance, < or =30 mL/min) and those with end-stage renal disease. In patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment, daily doses should not exceed 100 mg. Nine short-term studies of desvenlafaxine have been conducted but only 8 were published. These 8 clinical studies evaluated oral desvenlafaxine 50 to 400 mg/d using randomized controlled trials for the treatment of MDD in adult outpatients. Significantly greater efficacy in the reduction of depressive symptoms was found in patients taking desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d (P < 0.05) compared with placebo. No additional therapeutic benefits were found at doses >50 mg/d. Preliminary data support desvenlafaxine's efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms. Desvenlafaxine was generally well tolerated in clinical trials; the most common adverse events were nausea, suicidal ideation, and changes in blood pressure and weight., Conclusions: Desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d has been found to be efficacious and generally well tolerated in short-term trials for the treatment of adults with MDD. Further studies are needed to determine des-venlafaxine's role in the management of MDD and its efficacy compared with other antidepressants.

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common, chronic illness associated with substantial disability and economic burden. Although a number of effective antidepressants are available, the need for new medications that are effective and well tolerated remains., Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d with placebo for MDD. A post hoc pooled analysis was conducted to evaluate this study in the context of all similarly designed, completed studies with the 2 doses., Methods: This was an 8-week, Phase III, randomized, double-blind, duloxetine-referenced, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial conducted in 21 centers across the United States. Duloxetine was included for assay sensitivity as a positive control; the study was not designed or powered to compare desvenlafaxine with duloxetine. Participants were outpatients aged > or =18 years with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition-defined MDD and a 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D(17)) score > or =20. Patients were randomly assigned at baseline to fixed-dose desvenlafaxine (50 or 100 mg/d), fixed-dose duloxetine (60 mg/d), or placebo. The primary outcome measure was HAM-D(17) total score at the final evaluation. Additional measures included the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) score, Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score, and 6-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Bech version (HAM-D(6)). Tolerability assessments included discontinuation rates, adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and laboratory tests. The post hoc pooled analysis was performed using data from the current study and 2 previously published, positive studies that compared the efficacy and tolerability of desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d with placebo for MDD. The design and methodologies of the 2 studies were similar to the methodology of the current trial, other than not including a reference compound., Results: Of the 925 patients who were screened, 287 did not meet entry criteria, and 638 patients enrolled in the study; the intent-to-treat (ITT) population included 615 patients who were evaluated for efficacy (mean [SD] age range, 38.8-40.7 [12.1-13.2] years; mean weight range, 83.3-87.0 [22.8-23.9] kg; female sex, 398 [64.7%]; white race, 458 [74.5%]). The primary end point did not reach significance based on the global F test for controlling multiplicity of the desvenlafaxine doses. Based on pairwise comparison, significantly greater improvements on the HAM-D(17) were observed in the desven-lafaxine 100 mg/d (-10.5; P = 0.028, unadjusted for multiple comparisons) and duloxetine 60 mg/d groups (-10.3; P = 0.047) compared with placebo (-8.7). Desvenlafaxine 100 mg/d and duloxetine 60 mg/d were associated with significantly better scores compared with placebo on the CGI-I, MADRS, CGI-S, and HAM-D(6). No significant differences were observed in any scale between the desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d and placebo groups. Discontinuation rates due to AEs were 5%, 7%, 13%, and 6% for the desvenlafaxine 50-mg/d, desvenlafaxine 100-mg/d, duloxetine 60-mg/d, and placebo groups, respectively. The ITT population from all 3 studies in the pooled analysis consisted of 1388 patients (mean [SD] age range, 38.8-45.7 [12.1-12.6] years; mean weight range, 73.1-87.0 [17.6-23.9] kg; female sex, 896 [64.6%]; white race, 1136 [81.8%]). Significantly greater improvements on the HAM-D(17) were observed for desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d (-11.5; P < 0.001) and 100 mg/d (-11.8; P < 0.001) versus placebo (-9.6). Both doses were significantly better than placebo on the CGI-I, MADRS, and HAM-D(6)., Conclusions: The current study failed to meet its primary efficacy end point based on the a priori analysis plan. Desvenlafaxine was generally well tolerated. A post hoc pooled analysis of this trial and 2 previously published trials with both desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d found both doses to be effective for MDD compared with placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: 00384033.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the anxiolytic efficacy, and speed of onset of efficacy, of pregabalin (PGB) and venlafaxine-XR (VXR) in patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). In this double-blind trial, outpatients, ages 18-65 years, who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, criteria for GAD were randomized to 8 weeks of flexible-dose treatment with PGB (300-600 mg/day), VXR (75-225 mg/day), or placebo (PBO). The intent-to-treat sample consisted of 121 patients on PGB [least square (LS) mean ± SE baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), 27.6 ± 0.4], 125 patients on VXR (baseline HAM-A, 27.4 ± 0.4), and 128 patients on PBO (baseline HAM-A, 26.8 ± 0.4). Treatment with PGB was associated with a significantly greater LS mean change in the HAM-A total score at last observation carried forward endpoint versus PBO (-14.5 ± 0.9 vs. -11.7 ± 0.9; P = 0.028). Treatment with VXR was not significant versus PBO at endpoint (-12.0 ± 0.9; -11.7 ± 0.9; P =0.968). Treatment with PGB showed an early onset of improvement, with significantly greater LS mean change in the HAM-A by day 4 versus both PBO (-5.3 ± 0.5 vs. -3.4± 0.5; P = 0.008) and VXR (-2.9 ± 0.5; P = 0.0012). The proportion of patients reporting a severe adverse event was similar for PGB (9.1%) and PBO (7.8%), but higher for VXR (20.0%; P < 0.05). In conclusion, PGB was a safe and effective treatment of GAD, with a significantly earlier onset of anxiolytic activity than VXR.

Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms., Study Design: This was a 26 week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 567 postmenopausal women (mean age, 53.7 years; time since natural menopause, 4.8 years) experiencing 50 or more hot flushes (HFs) per week, randomly assigned to desvenlafaxine (100 or 150 mg) or placebo. Change from baseline in average daily number of moderate to severe HFs and average daily HF severity were compared with placebo at weeks 4, 12, and 26., Results: A significantly greater decrease from baseline in number of HFs occurred at weeks 4 and 12 with 100 and 150 mg desvenlafaxine compared with placebo (week 12 reductions: 60%, 66%, and 47%, respectively; all P < or = .002). Only the 150 mg dose showed significant improvement from baseline at 26 weeks compared with placebo (week 26 reductions: 61%, 69%, and 51%, respectively), although the study was not powered to demonstrate efficacy beyond the initial 12 weeks of therapy. The average daily severity decreased significantly more at weeks 4 and 12 with desvenlafaxine compared with placebo (all P < or = .002). Significantly more desvenlafaxine-treated subjects than placebo-treated subjects discontinued because of adverse events during week 1 only., Conclusion: Desvenlafaxine is an effective treatment for menopausal HFs.

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of tesofensine, a triple monoamine reuptake inhibitor, in patients with advanced Parkinson disease (PD)., Design: A pilot phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. The study occurred in hospital-based outpatient clinics and in clinical trial units. Patients with advanced PD and levodopa-related motor fluctuations were enrolled. Tesofensine (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, or 1 mg) or placebo tablets were administered once daily for 14 weeks., Main Outcome Measures: Coprimary end points were the changes from baseline in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) subscale II (activities of daily living) plus subscale III (motor function) total score and in percentage of waking hours spent in "off" time noted in self-scoring diaries. Secondary end points were safety, pharmacokinetics, responder analysis (> or =20% reduction in UPDRS score and in off time), and changes in percentage of waking hours spent in "on" time with and without troublesome dyskinesia., Results: The adjusted mean differences (relative to placebo) were -4.7 points in UPDRS subscale II plus subscale III total score (P =.005) with tesofensine, 0.5 mg, and -7.1% in off time (-68 minutes, P =.02) with tesofensine, 0.25 mg. Other dosages did not induce statistically significant effects. The plasma concentration increased with the dosage, but no clear dose-response relationship was observed. Gastrointestinal tract and neuropsychiatric adverse events were more frequent with tesofensine than with placebo, especially at the higher dosages., Conclusions: Patients with PD in advanced stages showed modest improvements in UPDRS subscale II plus subscale III total score and in off time when treated with tesofensine, but a dose-response relationship could not be established for efficacy, while adverse drug reactions tended to be more frequent at higher dosages., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00148512.

Objective: To compare efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine succinate (desvenlafaxine) with placebo for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms., Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 707 healthy, postmenopausal women experiencing 50 or more moderate-to-severe hot flushes per week. Participants randomly received desvenlafaxine 50, 100, 150, or 200 mg or placebo daily. Trial duration was 52 weeks. Primary outcomes were change from baseline in average daily number of moderate-to-severe hot flushes and in daily hot flush severity score at weeks 4 and 12., Results: Six hundred twenty women with an average of 11 moderate-to-severe hot flushes per day at baseline completed at least one on-therapy evaluation for primary efficacy end points; 519 participants completed 12 weeks of treatment, and 368 completed the study. Desvenlafaxine 100 mg/d achieved a significantly greater reduction compared with placebo in average daily number of hot flushes at weeks 4 (P=.013) and 12 (P=.005), reaching a 64% decrease from baseline at week 12, and the 75% responder rate was significantly higher for desvenlafaxine 100 mg (50%) compared with placebo (29%; P=.003; number needed to treat=4.7) at week 12. Average daily severity of hot flushes was significantly lower in the desvenlafaxine 100-mg group compared with placebo at week 12 (P=.020). Desvenlafaxine-treated women reported significantly more treatment-emergent adverse events than placebo-treated women during the first week of therapy only., Conclusion: Desvenlafaxine is an effective nonhormonal treatment for vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women. Its tolerability profile is consistent with that of other serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00421031, Level of Evidence: I.

Aims: Evaluate duloxetine in the treatment of women with mixed urinary incontinence (MUI)., Materials and Methods: 588 women, 19-85 years old with >or=4 incontinence episodes/week were randomly assigned to duloxetine 80 mg/day (N = 300) or placebo (N = 288). Patients were classified into three symptom subgroups: stress or urge predominant MUI (SPMUI or UPMUI) or balanced MUI (BMUI) based on their responses to the validated Stress/Urge Incontinence Questionnaire. Half the population was randomly assigned to have urodynamics; SPMUI, UPMUI, and BMUI condition diagnoses were based on signs, symptoms, and urodynamic observations. The primary outcome measure was the change in incontinence episode frequency (IEF). Secondary outcome measures included the Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) scores, the ICI Quality of Life (ICIQ-SF) score, and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) rating., Results: At baseline, women with SPMUI averaged 15.9 IEF/week (61% stress), those with UPMUI averaged 13.2 (70% urge), and those with BMUI averaged 16.5 (52% urge). Overall IEF decreases were significantly greater with duloxetine than placebo (median percent reduction 60% vs. 47%, P < 0.001); both UUI and SUI episodes were significantly decreased with duloxetine (median SUI IEF reduction 59% vs. 43%, P = 0.001; UUI IEF reduction 58% vs. 40%, P < 0.001). Duloxetine IEF decreases were significantly greater for patients with SPMUI conditions and symptoms and for those with UPMUI conditions but not symptoms. Significant benefits were also demonstrated with duloxetine for improvements in I-QOL total score (11.5 points vs. 8.1 points, P = 0.002), all three I-QOL subscale scores, and for the ICIQ-SF score (-2.6 vs. -1.7, P = 0.002) as well as for PGI-I ratings (much/very much better 44.2% vs. 27.3%, P = 0.001)., Conclusion: Duloxetine demonstrated significant efficacy in this population of women with MUI., ((c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

This is a double-blind placebo-controlled study of sustained-release bupropion as a smoking cessation aid in alcoholics undergoing treatment for their alcoholism. Participants (N=58) were enrolled within 1 week of entry into alcohol treatment from community and Veterans Affairs Substance Use Disorder programs. All participants received nicotine patch and were invited to attend a smoking cessation lecture and group. Cigarette smoking and alcohol outcomes were measured at 6 months. Bupropion when added to nicotine patch did not improve smoking outcomes. One third of participants on bupropion reported discontinuing the drug during weeks 1-4. Participants reported cigarette outcomes with nicotine patch that are similar to those seen in the general population. All study participants significantly reduced cigarette use. Comorbid affective disorder or antipersonality disorder did not affect outcomes. Alcohol outcomes were improved in those who discontinued cigarettes.