Search

The periorbital area is the first area of the face to show signs of aging. To provide safe and natural looking rejuvenation of the delicate eyelids, and supporting structures, an advanced understanding of anatomy, ideal facial proportions, and the most effective methods for rejuvenation is discussed. Periocular rejuvenation is particularly challenging due to the intricate and delicate anatomy of the periocular area. To ensure safe and successful outcomes, it is crucial that injectors use a global approach when providing treatments and that they consider soft tissue, vasculature, and bone structure of the periocular region before administering treatments for aesthetic rejuvenation. Neuromodulators, specifically botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A), and hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers are 2 nonsurgical treatments frequently used to address signs of aging in the periocular area. The objective of this article is to review different BoNT-A and HA filler treatments and discuss how these treatments can be used for optimal rejuvenation of the periocular area.

Effective biomarkers are urgently needed to facilitate early diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), permitting early intervention, and consequently improving prognosis. In this study, we evaluate the usefulness of nine biomarkers and their association (combination) in predicting ASD onset and development. Data were analyzed using multiple independent mathematical and statistical approaches to verify the suitability of obtained results as predictive parameters. All biomarkers tested appeared useful in predicting ASD, particularly vitamin E, glutathione-S-transferase, and dopamine. Combining biomarkers into profiles improved the accuracy of ASD prediction but still failed to distinguish between participants with severe versus mild or moderate ASD. Library-based identification was effective in predicting the occurrence of disease. Due to the small sample size and wide participant age variation in this study, we conclude that the use of multi-parametric biomarker profiles directly related to autism phenotype may help predict the disease occurrence more accurately, but studies using larger, more age-homogeneous populations are needed to corroborate our findings.

What Is Known and Objective: The lag in the approval and development of psychiatric drugs between Japan and other countries has been a major issue both for patients with psychiatric diseases and for psychiatrists. The objective of this study was to analyse factors contributing to delays in launching new psychiatric drugs in Japan., Methods: We analysed data from Japan, the USA, and the UK for the approval of 23 standard psychiatric drugs and examined potential factors that might have contributed the delay of their launch., Results: Of the 23 standard psychiatric drugs, all of which were approved in the USA and the UK, only 13 were introduced in Japan between September 2000 and July 2011. None of their development strategies adopted the ICH E5 guideline on simultaneous development of drugs on a global scale. Twelve of the 13 drugs (not including atomoxetine) were approved in Japan after their approval in the USA and the UK. The median review time (from approval application to approval) of these 13 drugs in Japan was 23 months, which was considerably longer than those of the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency (10·0 and 13·5 months, respectively). The 10-13-month difference in review time cannot explain the overall 87- and 51-month delay in Japan after approval in the USA or UK., What Is New and Conclusion: There remains a large gap between Japan and Western countries, such as the USA and the UK, with regard to access to standard psychiatric drugs, despite several important reforms in the Japanese drug approval system., (© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)