Search

Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the Caribbean as well as globally. Within the Caribbean, the prevalence of TBI is approximately 706 per 100,000 persons – one of the highest rates per capita in the world. Research question: We aim to assess the economic productivity lost due to moderate to severe TBI in the Caribbean. Material and methods: The annual cost of economic productivity lost in the Caribbean from TBI was calculated from four variables: (1) the number of people with moderate to severe TBI of working age (15–64 years), (2) the employment-to-population ratio, (3) the relative reduction in employment for people with TBI, and (4) per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate whether the uncertainty of the TBI prevalence data result in substantive changes in the productivity losses. Results: Globally, there was an estimated 55 million (95% UI 53, 400, 547 to 57, 626, 214) cases of TBI in 2016 of which 322,291 (95% UI 292,210 to 359,914) were in the Caribbean. Using GDP per capita, we calculated the annual cost of potential productivity losses for the Caribbean to be $1.2 billion. Discussion and conclusion: TBI has a significant impact on economic productivity in the Caribbean. With upwards of $1.2 billion lost in economic productivity from TBI, there is an urgent need for appropriate prevention and management of this disease by upscaling neurosurgical capacity. Neurosurgical and policy interventions are necessary to ensure the success of these patients in order to maximize economic productivity.

Background and Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of operating room nurse (ORN) characteristics on the duration of elective neurosurgical procedures in adults. In addition, we conducted a cost-benefit analysis of various strategies for organizing the workflow of ORNs., Methods: We collected and analyzed operating times for adult elective neurosurgical procedures, categorizing them by surgeon, procedure complexity (dichotomized as technologically complex and simple), and ORN characteristics (dichotomized as ORN dedicated to neurosurgery [dORN] and ORN not dedicated to neurosurgery [ndORN]). The monetary valuation of operating times is based on the unitary cost per minute of the operating room, including opportunity costs of ORN, as well as their training costs and salaries. Cost-benefit analysis adopted the hospital perspective., Results: Analysis of operating times reveals an approximately 20-minute difference for complex procedures when performed with ndORN. However, there is no significant difference in operating times for simple procedures, whether they are conducted by dORN or ndORN. The additional annual cost incurred by complex procedures performed with ndORN is estimated at CHF 68 144.4 for the Geneva University Hospitals., Conclusion: Complex neurosurgical procedures exhibit shorter durations when performed by dORNs. We explore several hypotheses to explain this difference. By adapting available human resources and optimizing workflow organization, hospitals can potentially achieve a net benefit., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)

Neurosurgical education and training are the essential tenets for the development of a sustainable workforce. However, opportunities for training are limited in most parts of the world due to socioeconomic constraints and an inadequate workforce. This global deficit has triggered a huge drive to expand training opportunities. Although training programs are increasing numerically, most of these programs focus on basic residency training with no opportunities for fellowships and continuing education. Herein, we use the Foundation of International Education in Neurological Surgery as a global success model to elucidate on the role of fellowships, distant continuing education, and funding in neurosurgery., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Financial conflicts of interest between editorial board members and industry could lead to biases and impartial editorial decisions. We aimed to evaluate the frequency, amount, and characteristics of payments to editorial board members of neurosurgery journals over a 6-year period., Methods: In this cross-sectional study, editorial board members were derived from the top 10 neurosurgery journals based on Google Scholar metrics. The Open Payments database by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services was accessed to evaluate industry payments to editorial board members from 2017to 2022. Descriptive analyses were performed on payment data, adjusted for inflation using the consumer price indices., Results: We included 805 editorial board members. After excluding duplicate names, 342 (53.9%) of 634 had received payments between 2017 and 2022. Eight of 10 journals had more than 50% of editorial board members listed in the Open Payments database. Between 2017 and 2022, the total number of payments to editorial board members was $143 732 057, encompassing $1 323 936 in research payments, $69 122 067 in associated research funding, $5 380 926 in ownership and investment interests, and $67 905 128 in general payments. General payments decreased from $13 676 382 in 2017 to $8 528 003 in 2022. Royalties ($43 393 697) and consulting ($13 157 934) contributed the most to general payments between 2017 and 2022. Four journals had a percentage increase in total payments, whereas general payments decreased for 6 journals., Conclusion: Around 54% of editorial board members of neurosurgical journals received industry payments between 2017 and 2022. We identified journal-specific trends in industry payments and highlighted the importance of transparency and disclosure of financial conflicts of interests for neurosurgery journals., Competing Interests: Financial conflicts of interest between editorial board members and industry could lead to biases and impartial editorial decisions. We aimed to evaluate the frequency, amount, and characteristics of payments to editorial board members of neurosurgery journals over a 6-year period. Around 54% of editorial board members of neurosurgical journals received industry payments between 2017 and 2022. We identified journal-specific trends in industry payments and highlighted the importance of transparency and disclosure of financial conflicts of interests for neurosurgery journals., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)

The Sri Sathya Sai Central Trust (SSSCT) was founded in 1972 as a public charitable trust with the objectives of providing free education, healthcare, and public utility benefits without any discrimination. The neurosurgery department at the Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences (SSSIHMS), Bangalore, one of SSSCT's many hospitals, has been offering comprehensive services with state-of-the-art facilities for a diverse range of disorders since 2001. Operating on a unique "no-cost-to-patient" model and guided by an ethos of altruism introduced by its founder Sri Sathya Sai Baba, the department has successfully provided high-quality neurosurgical care to a large number of patients. This article reviews the genesis of the department, its milestones over more than two decades, and the contributions of leaders who have played an important role in shaping the department., (Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Neurology India, Neurological Society of India.)

Objective: The number of cerebrovascular (CV) surgeons has grown with the rise of endovascular neurosurgery. However, it is unclear whether the number of CV surgeon-scientists has concomitantly increased. With increasing numbers of CV neurosurgeons in the US workforce, the authors analyzed associated changes in National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation (NREF) funding trends for CV surgeons over time., Methods: Publicly available data were collected on currently practicing academic CV surgeons in the US. Inflation-adjusted NIH funding between 2009 and 2021 was surveyed using NIH RePORTER and Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research data. The K12 Neurosurgeon Research Career Development Program and NREF grant data were queried for CV-focused grants. Pearson R correlation, chi-square analysis, and the Mann-Whitney U-test were used for statistical analysis., Results: From 2009 to 2021, NIH funding increased: in total (p = 0.0318), to neurosurgeons (p < 0.0001), to CV research projects (p < 0.0001), and to CV surgeons (p = 0.0018). During this time period, there has been an increase in the total number of CV surgeons (p < 0.0001), the number of NIH-funded CV surgeons (p = 0.0034), and the percentage of CV surgeons with NIH funding (p = 0.370). Additionally, active NIH grant dollars per CV surgeon (p = 0.0398) and the number of NIH grants per CV surgeon (p = 0.4257) have increased. Nevertheless, CV surgeons have been awarded a decreasing proportion of the overall pool of neurosurgeon-awarded NIH grants during this time period (p = 0.3095). In addition, there has been a significant decrease in the number of K08, K12, and K23 career development awards granted to CV surgeons during this time period (p = 0.0024). There was also a significant decline in the proportion of K12 (p = 0.0044) and downtrend in early-career NREF (p = 0.8978) grant applications and grants awarded during this time period. Finally, NIH-funded CV surgeons were more likely to have completed residency less recently (p = 0.001) and less likely to have completed an endovascular fellowship (p = 0.044) as compared with non-NIH-funded CV surgeons., Conclusions: The number of CV surgeons is increasing over time. While there has been a concomitant increase in the number of NIH-funded CV surgeons and the number of NIH grants awarded per CV surgeon in the past 12 years, there has also been a significant decrease in CV surgeons with K08, K12, and K23 career development awards and a downtrend in CV-focused K12 and early-career NREF applications and awarded grants. The latter findings suggest that the pipeline for future NIH-funded CV surgeons may be in decline.

Objective: The Open Payments Program (OPP) was a database started in 2013 by the US government to report payments made by the medical device and pharmaceutical industry to physicians. Neurosurgery is a technologically advanced field that relies heavily on the latest innovations for complex treatment of its patient population. This study sought to explore the financial relationship between academic neurosurgeons and the industry., Methods: OPP data were reviewed for the year 2021 of all faculty neurosurgeons affiliated with a neurosurgery residency program. Trends related to general payments, research payments, associated research funding, ownership and investment interest, name of the companies making payments, monetary amount of payments per company, and number of payments per company were analyzed., Results: Industry payments to 1151 US academic neurosurgeons were reviewed. These neurosurgeons received $121.4 million in payments. Three hundred thirty-two companies made 18,466 payments. The average payment per neurosurgeon was approximately six-fold higher than that of all other physicians. Vascular and spine subspecialties received the highest payments. A higher proportion of research money was allocated to the Pacific division, while all other categories (including total amount) were higher in the Eastern US. Most financial contributions were made by a small number of companies., Conclusions: Neurosurgery has been rated by many as a field fueled by research, innovation, and technology. In 2021, academic neurosurgeons had a strong relationship with the medical device and pharmaceutical industry as reflected in the OPP data. While the true impact on patient care cannot be directly measured, the advancement of the field relies heavily on these collaborations.

Objective: Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) is a method used in cost accounting that has gained traction in health economics to identify value optimization initiatives. It measures time, assigns value to time increments spent on a patient, and integrates the cost of material and human resources utilized in each episode of care. In this study, the authors report the first use of TDABC to evaluate costs in a pediatric neurosurgical practice., Methods: A clinical pathway was developed with a multifunction team. A time survey among each care team member, including surgeons, medical assistants (MAs), and patient service representatives (PSRs), was carried out prospectively over a 10-week period at a pediatric neurosurgery clinic. Consecutive patient encounters for Chiari malformation (CM), hydrocephalus, or tethered cord syndrome (TCS) were included. Encounters were categorized as new or established. Relative annual personnel costs, using the salary of a PSR as a reference (i.e., 1.0-unit cost), were calculated for all members using departmental financial data after adjustments. The relative capacity cost rates (minute-1) for each personnel, a representation of per capita cost per minute, were then derived, and the relative costs per visit were calculated., Results: A total of 110 visits (24 new, 86 established) were captured, including 40% CM, 41% hydrocephalus, and 19% TCS encounters. Surgeons had the highest relative capacity cost rate (118.4 × 10-6), more than 10-fold higher than that of an MA or PSR (10.65 × 10-6 and 9.259 × 10-6, respectively). Surgeons also logged more time with patients compared with the rest of the care team in nearly all visits (p ≤ 0.002); consequently, the total visit costs were primarily driven by the surgeon cost (p < 0.0001). Overall, surgeon cost constituted the vast majority of the total visit cost (92%-93%), regardless of whether the visits were new or established. Visit costs did not differ by diagnosis. On average, new visits took longer than established visits (p < 0.001). This difference was largely driven by new CM visits (44.3 ± 13.7 minutes), which were significantly longer than established CM visits (29.8 ± 9.2 minutes; p = 0.001)., Conclusions: TDABC may reveal opportunities to maximize value by highlighting instances of variability and high cost in each module of care delivery. Physician leaders in pediatric neurosurgery may be able to use this information to allocate costs and streamline value care pathways.

Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the Caribbean as well as globally. Within the Caribbean, the prevalence of TBI is approximately 706 per 100,000 persons - one of the highest rates per capita in the world., Research Question: We aim to assess the economic productivity lost due to moderate to severe TBI in the Caribbean., Material and Methods: The annual cost of economic productivity lost in the Caribbean from TBI was calculated from four variables: (1) the number of people with moderate to severe TBI of working age (15-64 years), (2) the employment-to-population ratio, (3) the relative reduction in employment for people with TBI, and (4) per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate whether the uncertainty of the TBI prevalence data result in substantive changes in the productivity losses., Results: Globally, there was an estimated 55 million (95% UI 53, 400, 547 to 57, 626, 214) cases of TBI in 2016 of which 322,291 (95% UI 292,210 to 359,914) were in the Caribbean. Using GDP per capita, we calculated the annual cost of potential productivity losses for the Caribbean to be $1.2 billion., Discussion and Conclusion: TBI has a significant impact on economic productivity in the Caribbean. With upwards of $1.2 billion lost in economic productivity from TBI, there is an urgent need for appropriate prevention and management of this disease by upscaling neurosurgical capacity. Neurosurgical and policy interventions are necessary to ensure the success of these patients in order to maximize economic productivity., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background: The intensive training requirements needed to achieve the requisiste microneurosurgical milestones makes proper training and skill acquisition a challenge to the novice neurosurgeon. This problem is compounded in low- and middle-income nations, where neurosurgery is subject to a myriad of human and financial resource constraints. A temporary solution may be provided by low-cost laboratories that are adaptive to local needs., Methods: The "HOZ NeuroSurgery LAB" is a nonprofit facility dedicated to microneurosurgery education and skills training. The laboratory, established in June 2015, is housed at the Neurosurgery Teaching Hospital in Baghdad, Iraq. It operates under the motto "More Laboratory Simulation-Fewer Brain Complications.". The fundamental infrastructure of the facility consists of a relatively inexpensive microscope, indigenous locally created training equipment, and animal-based models., Results: Since its inception, this lab has functioned as a hub for resident education and microneurosurgery service, in addition to contributing to the specialty's academic output in the nation. The lab is directly responsible for training 4 vascular neurosurgeons who are currently directing the nation's first organized neurovascular service. Also, it has delivered 53 microneurosurgery skills courses, coordinated 8 student neurosurgery elective cycles with a total of 532 participants, and published approximately 70 research articles., Conclusions: Our experience may serve as a model for other low- and middle-income countries interested in using the principle of "doing more with less" to overcome some of the challenges associated with microneurosurgery in these parts of the world., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We hypothesized that trauma surgeons can safely selectively manage traumatic craniomaxillofacial injuries (CMF) without specialist consult, thereby decreasing the overall cost burden to patients., Methods: A 4-year retrospective analysis of all CMF fractures diagnosed on facial CT scans. CMF consultation was compared with no-CMF consultation. Demographics, injury severity, and specialty consultation charges were recorded. Penetrating injuries, skull fractures, or patients completing inpatient craniofacial surgery were excluded., Results: 303 patients were studied (124 CMF consultation vs 179 no-CMF consultation), mean age was 47.8 years, with 70% males. Mean Glasgow Coma Scale and Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 14 ± 3.4 and 10 ± 9, respectively. Patients with CMF consults had higher ISS ( P < .001) and needed surgery on admission ( P < .001), while no-CMF consults had shorter length of stay ( P < .002). No in-hospital mortality or 30-day readmission rates were related to no-CMF consult. Total patient charges saved with no-CMF consultation was $26 539.96., Discussion: Trauma surgeons can selectively manage acute CMF injuries without inpatient specialist consultation. Additional guidelines can be established to avoid tertiary transfers for specialty consultation and decrease patient charges.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed health care delivery across the United States. Few analyses have specifically looked at quantifying the financial impact of the pandemic on practicing neurosurgeons. A survey analysis was performed to address this need., Methods: A 19-question survey was distributed to practicing neurosurgeons in the United States and its territories. The questions evaluated respondents' assessments of changes in patient and procedural volume, salary and benefits, practice expenses, staffing, applications for government assistance, and stroke management. Responses were stratified by geographic region., Results: The response rate was 5.1% (267/5224). Most respondents from each region noted a >50% decrease in clinic volume. Respondents from the Northeast observed a 76% decrease in procedure volume, which was significantly greater than that of other regions (P = 0.003). Northeast respondents were also significantly more likely to have been reassigned to nonneurosurgical clinical duties during the pandemic (P < 0.001). Most respondents also noted decreased salary and benefits but experienced no changes in overall practice expenses. Most respondents did not experience significant reductions in nursing or midlevel staffing. These trends were not significantly different between regions., Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to decreases in patient and procedural volume and physician compensation despite stable practice expenses. Significantly more respondents in the Northeast region noted decreases in procedural volume and reassignment to nonneurosurgical COVID-related medical duties. Future analysis is necessary as the pandemic evolves and the long-term clinical and economic implications become clear., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Few studies have evaluated the cost burden borne by neurosurgical patients in the developing world and their potential implications for efficient and effective delivery of care. This study aims to assess the cost associated with obtaining pediatric neurosurgical care in a hospital in Kaduna., Methods: All patients younger than 15 years who had a neurosurgical operation from July to December 2019 were included in the study. The characteristics of the patients were obtained using a proforma while the cost data were retrieved from the accounts unit of the hospital. The direct cost was obtained from the billing records of the hospital. Indirect cost was obtained using a questionnaire. The data obtained were analyzed using SPSS version 25 for Windows., Results: A total of 27 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 7.2 years and a standard deviation of 4.95 years. The 2 most common procedures done were craniotomy for trauma and ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion for hydrocephalus. The mean total cost of a neurosurgical procedure was $895.99. Intensive care unit length of stay was found to have a significant influence on the direct cost. The cost of surgery and investigation were the main contributors to the total cost of care with a mean of $618.3 and a standard deviation of $248.67., Conclusions: The mean cost of pediatric neurosurgical procedures in our setting is $895.99, which is 40.18% of our gross domestic product per capita. The main drivers of cost are the cost of operation, investigations, and intensive care unit length of stay., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Given its minimally invasive nature and effectiveness, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a mainstay for the multimodal treatment of intracranial neoplasm. However, no studies have evaluated recent trends in the use of SRS versus those of open resection for the management of brain tumor or trends in the involvement of neurosurgeons in SRS (which is primarily delivered by radiation oncologists). Here, the authors used publicly available Medicare data from 2009 to 2018 to elucidate trends in the treatment of intracranial neoplasm and to compare reimbursements between these approaches., Methods: By using CPT Professional 2019, the authors identified 10 open resection and 9 SRS codes (4 for neurosurgery and 5 for radiation oncology) for the treatment of intracranial neoplasm. Medicare payments (inflation adjusted) and allowed services (number of reimbursed procedures) for each code were abstracted from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Part B National Summary Data File (2009-2018). Payments per procedure and procedures per 100,000 Medicare enrollees were analyzed with linear regression and compared with tests for equality of slopes (α = 0.05). The average payment per procedure over the study period was compared by using the 2-tailed Welsh unequal variances t-test, and more granular comparisons were conducted by using ANOVA with post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) tests., Results: From 2009 to 2018, the number of SRS treatments per 100,000 Medicare enrollees for intracranial neoplasm increased by 3.97 cases/year (R2 = 0.99, p < 0.001), while comparable open resections decreased by 0.34 cases/year (R2 = 0.85, p < 0.001) (t16 = 7.5, p < 0.001). By 2018, 2.6 times more SRS treatments were performed per 100,000 enrollees than open resections (74.9 vs 28.7 procedures). However, neurosurgeon involvement in SRS treatment declined over the study period, from 23.4% to 11.5% of SRS treatments; simultaneously, the number of lesions treated per session increased from 1.46 to 1.84 (R2 = 0.98, p < 0.001). Overall, physician payments from 2013 to 2018 averaged $1816.08 (95% CI $1788.71-$1843.44) per SRS treatment and $1565.59 (95% CI $1535.83-$1595.34) per open resection (t10 = 15.9, p < 0.001). For neurosurgeons specifically, reimbursements averaged $1566 per open resection, but this decreased to $1031-$1198 per SRS session; comparatively, radiation oncologists were reimbursed even less (average $359-$898) per SRS session (p < 0.05 according to the Tukey HSD test for all comparisons)., Conclusions: Over a decade, the number of open resections for intracranial neoplasm in Medicare enrollees declined slightly, while the number of SRS procedures increased greatly. This latter expansion is largely attributable to radiation oncologists; meanwhile, neurosurgeons have shifted their involvement in SRS toward sessions for the management of multiple lesions.

No physician can successfully deliver high-value patient care in the modern-day health care system in isolation. Delivery of effective patient care requires integrated and collaborative systems that depend on dynamic professional relationships among members of the health care team. An overview of the socioeconomic implications of professional relationships within modern care delivery systems and potential employment models is presented., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Practicing neurosurgery in 2021 requires a detailed knowledge of the vocabulary and mechanisms for coding and reimbursement, which should include general knowledge at the global level and fluency at the provider level. It is specifically of interest for the neurosurgeon to understand conceptually the nuances of hospital reimbursement. That knowledge is especially germane as more neurosurgeons become hospital employees. Here we provide an overview of the mechanics of coding. We illustrate the formula to generate physician reimbursement through the current relative value unit structure. We also seek to explain hospital-level reimbursement through the diagnosis-related group structure. Finally, we expand about different and ancillary income streams available to neurosurgeons and provide a realistic assessment including the opportunities and challenges of those entities., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: The Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation (NREF) provides research support for in-training and early career neurosurgeon-scientists. To define the impact of this funding, the authors assessed the success of NREF awardees in obtaining subsequent National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding., Methods: NREF in-training (Research Fellowship [RF] for residents) and early career awards/awardees (Van Wagenen Fellowship [VW] and Young Clinician Investigator [YCI] award for neurosurgery faculty) were analyzed. NIH funding was defined by individual awardees using the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting tool (1985-2014)., Results: Between 1985 and 2014, 207 unique awardees were supported by 218 NREF awards ($9.84 million [M] in funding), including 117 RF ($6.02 M), 32 VW ($1.68 M), and 69 YCI ($2.65 M) awards. Subspecialty funding included neuro-oncology (79 awards; 36% of RF, VW, and YCI awards), functional (53 awards; 24%), vascular (37 awards; 17%), spine (22 awards; 10%), pediatrics (18 awards; 8%), trauma/critical care (5 awards; 2%), and peripheral nerve (4 awards; 2%). These awardees went on to receive $353.90 M in NIH funding that resulted in an overall NREF/NIH funding ratio of 36.0:1 (in dollars). YCI awardees most frequently obtained later NIH funding (65%; $287.27 M), followed by VW (56%; $41.10 M) and RF (31%; $106.59 M) awardees. YCI awardees had the highest NREF/NIH funding ratio (108.6:1), followed by VW (24.4:1) and RF (17.7:1) awardees. Subspecialty awardees who went on to obtain NIH funding included vascular (19 awardees; 51% of vascular NREF awards), neuro-oncology (40 awardees; 51%), pediatrics (9 awardees; 50%), functional (25 awardees; 47%), peripheral nerve (1 awardees; 25%), trauma/critical care (2 awardees; 20%), and spine (2 awardees; 9%) awardees. Subspecialty NREF/NIH funding ratios were 56.2:1 for vascular, 53.0:1 for neuro-oncology, 47.6:1 for pediatrics, 34.1:1 for functional, 22.2:1 for trauma/critical care, 9.5:1 for peripheral nerve, and 0.4:1 for spine. Individuals with 2 NREF awards achieved a higher NREF/NIH funding ratio (83.3:1) compared to those with 1 award (29.1:1)., Conclusions: In-training and early career NREF grant awardees are an excellent investment, as a significant portion of these awardees go on to obtain NIH funding. Moreover, there is a potent multiplicative impact of NREF funding converted to NIH funding that is related to award type and subspecialty.

Background: Global use of telemedicine has increased rapidly during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to bridge the gap in existing health care services. Intercontinental trends in neurosurgeons' perception and practices of telemedicine have been sparingly reported., Methods: We conducted an online anonymized and validated survey using a structured questionnaire to gain insight into neurosurgeons' experience with telemedicine across various continents and rated its usefulness on a 5-point Likert scale., Results: We received 286 responses across 5 continents. There was a trend to support a major paradigm shift favoring teleconsultations during the COVID-19 pandemic in respondents from North America (P = 0.06). Signed prescriptions were e-mailed along with video-based teleconsultations preferentially in Europe and North America. In comparison, audio- or text-based teleconsultations along with unsigned prescriptions were prevalent in Asia and Africa (P = 0.0005). Acceptability and perceived usefulness for telemedicine during the pandemic were similar across the globe, regardless of neurosurgeons' experience (mean satisfaction score 3.72 ± 1.09; P = 0.62). A majority of neurosurgeons from Asia and South America complained of difficulties during teleconsultations owing to lack of appropriate infrastructure, internet connectivity/prescription-related issues, and potential risk of litigation (P = 0.0005). Approximately 46% of neurosurgeons, predominantly from Europe and North America, thought that telemedicine could play a vital role in clinical practice even after the COVID-19 pandemic subsides (mean satisfaction score 3.26 ± 1.16; P = 0.007)., Conclusions: Telemedicine in neurosurgery is a viable alternative to physical outpatient services during the COVID-19 pandemic and could potentially play a vital role after the pandemic., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Present guidelines on reducing aerosol generation during neurosurgical procedures are futile. The aim of this article was to describe a novel device to contain aerosol within a small localized environment around the operative field-the negative pressure assisted microenvironment surgical hood (NEPA-MESH)., Methods: This device can be assembled using easily available materials-steel wires, image intensifier cover, surgical drape, and three-dimensional-printed self-locking copolyester double hoops. Large-bore pipes in continuity with a high-volume suction apparatus create a constant negative pressure microenvironment around the operative field. The CEM DT-9880 particle counter was used to estimate particle concentration inside the NEPA-MESH during various stages of a neurosurgical procedure as well as outside. The NEPA-MESH was tested in different craniotomies and endoscopic procedures., Results: Mean particle concentration inside the NEPA-MESH and outside during drilling in various procedures was calculated and compared using unpaired t test. Significant reduction in particle concentrations was recorded for particles sized 0.3 μm (t = 17.55, P < 0.0001), 0.5 μm (t = 11.39, P < 0.0001), 1 μm (t = 6.36, P = 0.0002), 2.5 μm (t = 2.04, P = 0.074), 5.0 μm (t = 7.026, P = 0.0008), and 10 μm (t = 4.39, P = 0.0023)., Conclusions: As definitive evidence demonstrating the presence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in aerosol particles is awaited, we describe a cost-effective strategy to reduce aerosol contamination. Significant reduction in particle concentrations was seen outside the NEPA-MESH compared with inside it during various stages of neurosurgical procedures., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Although studies have evaluated the economic burden to medical students desiring a neurosurgery residency broadly, a detailed breakdown of costs has not been reported. Given that the Association of American Medical Colleges and Society of Neurological Surgeons have recommended neurosurgery residency programs for the 2021 residency application cycle cancel away rotations and in-person interviews, our objective was to evaluate cost savings to medical students applying during this time and the implications., Methods: Using the 2019-2020 Texas STAR Dashboard database, we queried responses from neurosurgery residency applicants. We recorded application costs, away rotation costs, interview costs, and total costs for medical school seniors applying to neurosurgery residency. Demographic information for applicants was also recorded. Mean and median costs were reported with percentile distributions and geographic comparisons. A Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to determine differences in mean costs by medical school region., Results: Our cohort included 121 U.S. allopathic applicants to neurosurgery residency. Mean application costs were $1711, away rotation costs were $3840, interview costs were $6400, and total costs were $11,882. No significant difference was observed for mean total costs for applicants from schools in the central ($10,525/applicant), northeast ($11,311/applicant), south ($12,660/applicant) and west ($12,404/applicant) regions (P = 0.181). There was no significant difference in the mean application fees, away rotation costs, or interview costs among regions., Conclusions: In the COVID-19 era, neurosurgery residency applicants could save >$10,000 through the use of virtual interviews and lack of away rotations. There are potential geographic trends; however, further evaluation should be performed., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Practice consolidation in healthcare has widespread consequences for providers and patients. Although many studies describe this phenomenon in various medical specialties, no such analysis has been performed in neurosurgery specifically. The goal of this study was to assess the trends in the size of U.S. neurosurgery practices over a 5-year period., Methods: Neurosurgery practice characteristics were obtained from the Medicare Physician Compare database from March 2014 through October 2019 on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Website. Neurosurgeons were separated on the basis of their practice size. Group practice sizes ranged from solo practitioner practice to large multispecialty groups and health organizations. Eight groups were identified (1 or 2, 3-9, 10-24, 25-49, 50-99, 100-499, 500-999, and ≥1000 members). Additionally, neurosurgery practices were analyzed across the 4 U.S. geographical regions to understand changes in practice size and distribution., Results: The percentage of neurosurgeons in smaller practices of 1 or 2 members decreased, from 20.09% to 13.05%; 3-9 members, from 17.79% to 9.41%; and 10-24 members, from 10.53% to 8.0%. The largest increase was seen in health organizations of 1000 members or more, with an increase from 9.85% to 22.84%., Conclusions: This study shows that over the past 5 years, a substantial trend toward increasing practice sizes has evolved. The effect of the differences in practice size should be examined to determine the large-scale impacts on patient care, payment models, and healthcare access, in addition to neurosurgeon compensation, and satisfaction., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Geographic variations in health care costs have been reported for many surgical specialties., Objective: In this study, we sought to describe national and regional costs associated with transsphenoidal pituitary surgery (TPS)., Methods: Data from the Truven-MarketScan 2010-2014 were analyzed. We examined overall total, hospital/facility, physician, and out-of-pocket payments in patients undergoing TPS including technique-specific costs. Mean payments were obtained after risk adjustment for patient-level and system-level confounders and estimated differences across regions., Results: The estimated overall annual burden was $43 million/year in our cohort. The average overall total payment associated with TPS was $35,602.30, hospital/facility payment was $26,980.45, physician payment was $4685.95, and out-of-pocket payment was $2330.78. Overall total and hospital/facility costs were highest in the West and lowest in the South (both P < 0.001), whereas physician reimbursements were highest in the North-east and lowest in the South (P < 0.001). There were no differences in out-of-pocket expenses across regions. On a national level, there were significantly higher overall total and hospital/facility payments associated with endoscopic compared with microscopic procedures (both P < 0.001); there were no significant differences in physician payments or out-of-pocket expenses between techniques. There were also significant within-region cost differences in overall total, hospital/facility, and physician payments in both techniques as well as in out-of-pocket expenses associated with microsurgery. There were no significant regional differences in out-of-pocket expenses associated with endoscopic surgery., Conclusions: Our results show significant geographic cost disparities associated with TPS. Understanding factors behind disparate costs is important for developing cost containment strategies., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Open Payments Database (OPD) started in 2013 to combat financial conflicts of interest between physicians and medical industry., Objective: To evaluate the first 5 yr of the OPD regarding industry-sponsored research funding (ISRF) in neurosurgery., Methods: The Open Payments Research Payments dataset was examined from 2014 to 2018 for payments where the clinical primary investigator identified their specialty as neurosurgery., Results: Between 2014 and 2018, a $106.77 million in ISRF was made to 731 neurosurgeons. Fewer than 11% of neurosurgeons received ISRF yearly. The average received $140 000 in total but the median received $30,000. This was because the highest paid neurosurgeon received $3.56 million. A greater proportion ISRF was made to neurosurgeons affiliated with teaching institutions when compared to other specialties (26.74% vs 20.89%, P = .0021). The proportion of the total value of ISRF distributed to neurosurgery declined from 0.43% of payments to all specialties in 2014 to 0.37% in 2018 (P < .001), but no steady decline was observed from year to year., Conclusion: ISRF to neurosurgeons comprises a small percentage of research payments made to medical research by industry sponsors. Although a greater percentage of payments are made to neurosurgeons in teaching institutions compared to other specialties, the majority is given to neurosurgeons not affiliated with a teaching institution. A significant percentage of ISRF is given to a small percentage of neurosurgeons. There may be opportunities for more neurosurgeons to engage in industry-sponsored research to advance our field as long as full and complete disclosures can always be made., (© Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2021.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to characterize the payments made by medical industry to neurosurgeons from 2014 to 2018., Methods: A retrospective study was performed from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018 of the Open Payments Database. Collected data included the total number of industry payments, the aggregate value of industry payments, and the mean value of each industry payment made to neurosurgeons per year over the 5-year period., Results: A total of 105,150 unique surgeons, with 13,668 (12.99%) unique neurosurgeons, were identified to have received an industry payment during 2014-2018. Neurosurgeons were the second highest industry-paid surgical specialty, with a total 421,151 industry payments made to neurosurgeons, totaling $477,451,070. The mean average paid amount per surgeon was $34,932 (±$936,942). The largest proportion of payments were related to food and beverage (75.5%), followed by travel and lodging (14.9%), consulting fees (3.5%), nonconsulting service fees (2.1%), and royalties or licensing (1.9%), totaling 90.4% of all industry payments to neurologic surgeons. Summed across the 5-year period, the largest paid source types were royalties and licensing (64.0%; $305,517,489), consulting fees (11.8%; $56,445,950), nonconsulting service fees (7.3%; $34,629,109), current or prospective investments (6.8%, $32,307,959), and travel and lodging (4.8%, $22,982,165)., Conclusions: Our study shows that over the most recent 5-year period (2014-2018) of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments Database, there was a decreasing trend of the total number of payments, but an increasing trend of the total amount paid to neurosurgeons., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

After the completion of an endoscopic spinal surgery fellowship, the next challenge for the newly minted consultant is to set up a viable and sustainable endoscopic practice. A successful practice of endoscopic spine surgery is dependent on several factors, such as anesthetic support; surgical expertise; support for provision and maintenance of endoscopic equipment; cost of equipment; administrative and nursing support; postoperative care services to optimize patients' outcome and satisfaction; patients' ideas, concerns, and expectations, as well as continuing medical education. In this article, a perspective is given on the early career challenges that a fellowship-trained endoscopic surgeon may encounter in the period leading to first successful endoscopic spinal surgery., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Existing research about surgical start time is equivocal about associations between outcomes and late start times, and there is only one published report investigating start time in spine surgery. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess associations between surgical start time, length of stay (LOS), and cost in lumbar spine surgery., Methods: Patients at a single institution undergoing posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) were grouped based on whether they received their surgery before or after 2 pm, with those receiving their surgery between 12 am and 6 am and receiving surgery for tumors, trauma, or infections being excluded. These 2 groups were then compared on the basis of demographics and outcomes with cost and LOS as the coprimary outcomes., Results: A total of 2977 patients underwent PLF during the study period. There were minimal differences in preoperative characteristics of the cohorts. The patients who underwent PLF starting after 2 pm had longer LOS (0.45 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.72; P = 0.001) and higher costs ($1343; 95% CI, $339-$2348; P = 0.009) than cases starting before 2 pm The late surgical start cohort also had higher rates of nonhome discharge (29.73% vs. 23.17%, P = 0.0004), and 30-day (4.36% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.01) and 90-day emergency department visits (5.72% vs. 2.94%, P = 0.0005)., Conclusions: Late surgical start time is associated with longer LOS and higher cost in patients undergoing PLF., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is a novel disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) that rapidly spread around the globe. The dramatic increase in the number of cases and deaths have placed tremendous strain on health care systems worldwide. As health care workers and society adjust to focus treatment and prevention of COVID-19, other facets of the health care enterprise are affected, particularly surgical volume and revenue. The purpose of this study was to describe the financial impact of COVID-19 on an academic neurosurgery department., Methods: A retrospective review of weekly average daily work relative value units (wRVUs) were compared before and after COVID-19 in the fiscal year 2020. A comparative time period of the same months in the year prior was also included for review. We also review strategies for triaging neurosurgical disease as needing emergent, urgent, or routine operative treatment., Results: Daily average wRVU after COVID-19 dropped significantly with losses in all weeks examined. Of the 7 weeks in the current post-COVID period, the weekly daily average wRVU was 173 (range, 128-363). The mean decline was 51.4% compared with the pre-COVID era. Both inpatient and outpatient revenue was affected., Conclusions: COVID-19 had a profound detrimental effect on surgical productivity and revenue generation., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Every year, there are an estimated 22.6 million new neurosurgical consultative cases worldwide, of which 13.8 million require surgery. In 2016, the global neurosurgical workforce was estimated and mapped as open-access information to guide neurosurgeons, affiliates, and policy makers. We present a subsequent investigation for mapping the global neurosurgical workforce for 2018 to show the replicability of previous data collection methods as well as to show any changes in workforce density., Methods: We extracted data on the absolute number of neurosurgeons per low and middle-income countries (LMICs) in 2016 from the database of the global neurosurgical workforce mapping project. The estimated number of neurosurgeons in each LMIC during 2018 was obtained from collaborators. The median workforce densities were calculated for 2016 and 2018. Neurosurgical workforce density heat maps were generated., Results: We received data from 119 countries (response rate 86.2%) and imputed data for 19 countries (13.8%). Seventy-eight (56.5%, N = 138) countries had an increase in their number of neurosurgeons, 9 (6.5%) showed a decrease, whereas 51 (37.0%) had the same number of neurosurgeons in both years. The pooled median increased from 0.17 (interquartile range, 0.54) in 2016 to 0.18 (interquartile range, 0.59) in 2018., Conclusions: Overall, the density of the neurosurgical workforce has increased from 2016 to 2018. However, at the current rate, 80 LMICs (58.0%) will not meet the neurosurgical workforce density target by 2030., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aftermath of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) witnessed the rise of narrow networks, which feature fewer providers in exchange for lower premiums. Debate still continues on whether narrow networks provide adequate access to health care, especially in specialty care services such as neurosurgery. The objective of this article was to analyze the 2019 Marketplace plans' impact on delivering outpatient neurosurgical care in New Jersey., Methods: The 2019 Marketplace Public Use Files were queried for "silver" plans, identifying a total of 11 plans across 3 insurance companies. Online search engines were used to identify the number of in-network neurosurgeons within 20-25 miles of ZIP codes at the center of each county. The primary outcome was the number of neurosurgeon-deficient plans, defined as those having no in-network neurosurgeons within the assigned mile radius., Results: Of all individuals who purchased an insurance plan, 73% (185,797/255,246) opted for a silver plan. Out of 111 active neurosurgeons in New Jersey, 25% (28/111) did not participate in any of the silver plans. Analysis showed 8 plans as neurosurgeon-deficient in Sussex and Warren. Meanwhile, most of the silver plans provided access to >5 neurosurgeons within 20-25 miles of most (17/21) county centers., Conclusions: In more densely populated states such as New Jersey, the impact of narrow networks on neurosurgical coverage is less apparent. However, frustrations regarding access to care still exist because nearly 25% of neurosurgeons do not participate in the standard ACA insurance product. Furthermore, guidelines that define network adequacy in neurosurgery remain elusive, which calls for more robust parameters to monitor and ensure adequate access to health care., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Nigerian Academy of Neurological Surgeons in 2019 resolved to standardize the practice of neurosurgery in Nigeria. It set up committees to standardize the various aspects of neurosurgery, such as neurotrauma, pediatrics, functional, vascular, skull base, brain tumor, and spine. The Committee on Neurotrauma convened and resolved to study most of the available protocols and guidelines in use in different parts of the world., Objective: To formulate a standard protocol for the practice of neurotrauma care within the Nigerian locality., Methods: The Committee split its membership into 3 subcommittees to cover the various aspects of the Neurotrauma Guidelines, such as neurotrauma curriculum, standard neurotrauma management protocols, and neurotrauma registry. Each subcommittee was to research on available models and formulate a draft for Nigerian neurotrauma., Results: All the 3 subcommittees had their reports ready on schedule. Each concurred that neurotrauma is a major public health challenge in Nigeria. They produced 3 different drafts on the 3 thematic areas of the project. The subcommittees are: 1. Subcommittee on Fellowship, Training and Research Curriculum; 2. Subcommittee on Standard Protocols and Management Guidelines; and 3. Subcommittee of the Nigerian Neurotrauma Registry., Conclusion: The committee concluded that a formal protocol for neurotrauma care is long overdue in Nigeria for the standardization of all aspects of neurotrauma. It then recommended the adoption of these guidelines by all institutions offering services in Nigeria using the management protocols, opening a registry, and mounting researches on the various aspects of neurotrauma., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Historically, women have been underrepresented in medicine but nowadays the underrepresentation is more applicable to surgical disciplines. Many efforts have been made to decrease the attrition rate of women in neurosurgery and to even career opportunities to be comparable to those of male colleagues. However, it is unclear if gender disparities occur between female and male neurosurgeons. Therefore, the aim of the current study is to identify gender differences in the professional and private life of neurosurgeons., Methods: A survey consisting of 38 questions was sent to members of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons regarding demographics, career fulfillment, private life, and parenting. Comparison between female and male respondents was made., Results: A total of 870 members filled in surveys, which were analyzed. Working full time, days worked weekly, and gross salary did not differ between male and female neurosurgeons. However, female neurosurgeons rated their career fulfillment worse than did male neurosurgeons (P < 0.001) and were less likely to choose a career as a neurosurgeon again (P < 0.001). Furthermore, female neurosurgeons were less likely to be married or to have children than were male colleagues (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Despite efforts to increase the amount of women enrolling into neurosurgery and despite efforts to strive for equality, the results of the current study show gender disparities in professional and private careers among neurosurgeons. Practice patterns did not differ between male and female neurosurgeons, but perceptions of career and characteristics of private life did. Program directors and chairs should focus on measures to decrease gender differences and to strive for equal career satisfaction among female and male neurosurgeons., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Enthusiasm for research and teaching are often the main reasons neurosurgical residents choose academic careers, and subspecialty choice usually stems from an interest in that particular field. However, recent salary data bring to light a work relative value unit-related trend in American academic neurosurgeon salaries, one that is similar to private practice, where compensation is strongly correlated with clinical productivity. In addition, there are significant disparities in how various subspecialties are remunerated in academic settings. For example, functional and pediatric specialists earn significantly lower salaries on average compared with their spine and endovascular colleagues. These trends have important implications both for neurosurgical trainees and for institutions in the United States., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Whenever any new technology is introduced into the healthcare system, it should satisfy all three pillars of the iron triangle of health care, which are quality, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility. There has been quite advancement in the field of spine surgery in the last two decades with introduction of new technological modalities such as CAN and surgical robotic devices. MAZOR SpineAssist/Renaissance was the first robotic system to be approved for the use in spine surgeries in the USA in 2004. In this review, the authors sought to determine if the current literature supports this technology to be cost-effective, accessible, and improve the quality of care for individuals and populations by increasing the likelihood of desired health outcomes. Robotic-assisted surgery seems to provide perfection in surgical ergonomics and surgical dexterity, consequently improving patient outcomes. A lot of data is present on the accuracy, effectiveness, and safety of the robotic-guided technology which reflects remarkable improvements in quality of care, making its utility convincingly undisputable. The technology has been claimed to be cost-effective but there seems to be lack of data in the literature on this topic to validate this claim. Apart from just the outcome parameters, there is an immense need of studies on real-time cost-efficacy, patient perspective, surgeon and resident learning curve, and their experience with this new technology. Furthermore, new studies looking into increased utilities of this technology, such as brain and spine tumor resection, deep brain stimulation procedures, and osteotomies in deformity surgery, might authenticate the cost of the equipment.

Background: Transitional care programs (TCPs) coordinate care to improve safety and efficiency surrounding hospital discharge. While TCPs have the potential to reduce hospital length of stay and readmissions, their financial implications are less well understood., Objective: To perform a cost-benefit analysis of a previously published neurosurgical TCP implemented at an urban academic hospital from 2013 to 2015., Methods: Patients received intensive preoperative education and framing of expectations for hospitalization, in-hospital discharge planning and medication reconciliation with a nurse educator, and a follow-up phone call postdischarge. The cost-benefit analysis involved program costs (nurse educator salary) and total direct hospital costs within the 30-d perioperative window including readmission costs., Results: The average cost of the TCP was $435 per patient. The TCP was associated with an average total cost reduction of 17.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.3%-26.7%, P = .001). This decrease was driven by a 14.3% reduction in the average initial admission cost (95% CI: 6.2%-23.7%, P = .001), largely attributable to the 16.3% decrease in length of stay (95% CI: 9.93%-23.49%, P < .001). Thirty-day readmissions were significantly decreased in the TCP group, with a 5.5% readmission rate for controls and 2.4% for TCP enrollees (P = .04). The average cost of readmission was decreased by 71.3% (95% CI: 58.7%-74.7%, P < .01)., Conclusion: This neurosurgical TCP was associated with decreased costs of initial admissions, 30-d readmissions, and total costs of hospitalization alongside previously published decreased length of stay and reduced 30-d readmission rates. These results underscore the clinical and financial feasibility and impact of transitional care in a surgical setting., (Copyright © 2018 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)

Stereotactic radiosurgery is a safe and effective technology that can address a variety of neurosurgical conditions, but in many parts of the world, access remains an issue. Although the technology is increasingly available in the United States, Canada, Europe, and parts of Asia, poor access to central nervous system (CNS) imaging and inadequate treatment equipment in other parts of the world limit the availability of radiosurgery as a treatment option. In addition, epidemiologic data about cancer and CNS metastases in low-income countries are sparse and much less complete than in more developed countries, and the need for radiosurgery may be underestimated as a result. Current radiosurgical platforms can be expensive to install and require a substantial amount of personnel training for safe operation. Socioeconomic and political forces are relevant to limitations to and opportunities for improving access to care. Here we examine the current barriers to access and propose areas for future efforts to improve global availability of radiosurgery for neurosurgical conditions., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A large gender gap exists in industry funding for academic neurosurgeons. Selection criteria for funding distribution remain unclear. However, academic rank, scholarly productivity, and experience have been suggested as determining factors., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of industry payments to US academic neurosurgeons. We used online faculty listings to determine academic rank and gender, then used the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payment Database to identify industry contributions. Details were collected on H-index and length of time in practice was used as a proxy for experience., Results: Of the 1481 academic neurosurgeons included, men were in the majority (91% vs. 9%, P = 0.0001). Relative to their male colleagues, female assistant and associate professors received fewer payments (4 vs. 8, P = 0.0040; 2 vs. 7, P = 0.0067) at lower median values ($409 vs. $437, P = 0.0490; $163 vs. $260, P = 0.0089). H-index was more strongly associated with general payment receipt for women academic neurosurgeons (r = 0.20, P = 0.0201) than men academic neurosurgeons (r = 0.06, P = 0.0301). Experience trended toward a significant association with industry funding in men (r = 0.05, P = 0.0601). After adjustment for scholarly productivity and experience, gender-based funding inequalities became insignificant., Conclusions: In academic neurosurgery, substantial gender disparities exist in industry payments and metrics of academic success. There may be an industry selection bias toward recruitment of key opinion and thought leaders, as identified by scholarly productivity and experience. Despite the objective gender inequalities, industry funding to academic neurosurgeons appears to be equitable when metrics of academic success are considered., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Socioeconomic topics such as federal mandates/regulations, conflict of interest, and practice management have become increasingly important for all neurosurgeons. Graduating residents immediately need a host of skills to successfully navigate neurosurgical practice. Surgical and medical skills are closely evaluated through the American Board of Neurological Surgery, and a formal socioeconomic curriculum has been developed with defined milestones. Nevertheless, little has been done to evaluate neurosurgery resident competence in socioeconomic and medicolegal principles. The purpose of this study was to assess the competence of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education neurosurgical residents in socioeconomic knowledge., Methods: Neurosurgery resident members of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (N = 1385) were sent a Survey Monkey of 10 questions. The survey covered the most basic of socioeconomic principles. Initial survey responses were collected across a 1-month period from April to May 2018., Results: The response rate was 14% (194/1385). Overall, neurosurgery residents would have received a grade of D, with an average score of 67% on the survey. For 7 of the 10 questions, the majority (>50%) of neurosurgery residents answered correctly. Furthermore, for 3 questions, more than 90% of residents selected the correct answer. However, for one-half of all questions, residents averaged a score of less than 65%. Residents tended to answer questions correctly for physician compensation and compensation models, but incorrectly for topics of informed consent, Controlled Substances Act, and conflicts of interest., Conclusion: With the increasing complexity of neurosurgery practice, solid knowledge of socioeconomic topics is essential. The study confirms suspected deficiencies in socioeconomic proficiency among neurosurgery residents, despite the availability of a validated curriculum. This knowledge gap will likely affect career success and satisfaction. Nevertheless, this survey had a significantly low response rate, and it may be an incomplete representation of the neurosurgical resident mind. Focused educational initiatives through the neurosurgical Residency Review Committee and individual training programs must facilitate an action plan that ensures the effective implementation of socioeconomic curricula., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This brief communication describes the challenges faced by neurosurgeons in Low- or middle-income countries to treat neurosurgical emergencies from intracranial bleeds (whether traumatic or spontaneous). The authors point out that in low- or middle-income countries and Africa in particular, resources, facilities, and personnel are lacking to follow the guidelines proposed for treating these conditions in high-income countries. The proposal offered here is to move to early surgical intervention because algorithms to monitor patients under conservative management guidelines are often not possible., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: On September 25, 2015, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a 17-goal action plan to transform the world by the year 2030, ushering in the Era of Sustainable Development. These Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were designed to continue where the preceding Millennium Development Goals left off, expanding on the Millennium Development Goal successes, and facing the challenges encountered during the previous decade and a half. The current Era of Sustainable Development and its impact on a breadth of neurosurgical concerns provide several unprecedented opportunities to enhance political prioritization of neurosurgical care equity. Neurosurgeons could therefore be well positioned to participate in the leadership of these global health development and policy reform efforts., Methods: Each of the 17 SDGs was reviewed and analyzed for its relevance to the public health aspects of neurosurgery. The analysis was guided by a review of the literature performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, and the databases of the World Health Organization., Results: Among the 17 SDGs, 14 were found to be of direct or indirect relevance to neurosurgeons and neurosurgical care delivery. Results of this analysis are presented and discussed, and recommendations are provided for using this knowledge to inform the emerging discipline of global neurosurgery., Conclusions: This article contributes to the global neurosurgery movement by providing the socially and globally conscious neurosurgeon with a compass for directing the place of neurosurgery in the international agenda for sustainable development., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This analysis provides an overview of neurosurgery residency programs in Latin America; it evaluates strengths, weaknesses, and limitations within the Latin American Federation for Societies in Neurosurgery countries. Considering the shared cultural background between these neighboring countries and globalization of neurosurgical education, similarities in training characteristics and equal opportunities are expected. However, program differences are inevitable and should be investigated to promote collaboration and homogenization of training., Methods: A 39-item survey was distributed to 970 neurosurgeons and residents in Latin America to assess aspects including working conditions, teaching, research, training, educational opportunities, and socioeconomics., Results: In total, 276 neurosurgeons (28%) from 16 countries completed the survey. The average participant's age was 37 ± 7 years, and the average duration of residency programs was 5 ± 1 years. Trainees participated in around 5-10 cases during the typical 80-100 work hour week. Only 5% of survey respondents had a day off after a night shift, and 60% worked at least 3 night shifts per week. Only 34% had a mentorship program, Morbidity and mortality conferences were reported by 57% and research activities were compulsory in 45%. Satisfaction with evaluation methods was reported in 29%, although 96% reported satisfaction with their training programs overall., Conclusions: This study is the first of its kind to review neurosurgical training in Latin America's. Suggested areas of improvement include regulation of working hours, implementation of mentorship programs and standardized examinations, protected research time, increased support for conferences, and more opportunities for exchange rotations that will potentially bolster collaboration between programs., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Due to disparaging costs and rates of malpractice claims in neurosurgery, there has been significant interest in identifying high-risk specialties, types of malpractice claims, and characteristics of claim-prone physicians., Objective: To characterize the malpractice claims against neurosurgeons., Methods: This was a comprehensive analysis of all malpractice liability claims involving a neurosurgeon as the primary defendant, conducted using the Physician Insurers Association of America Data Sharing Project from January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2012., Results: From 2003 to 2012, 2131 closed malpractice claims were filed against a neurosurgeon. The total amount of indemnity paid collective between 1998 to 2002, 2003 to 2007, and 2008 to 2012 was $109 614 935, $140 031 875, and $122 577 230, respectively. Of all the neurosurgery claims, the most prevalent chief medical factor was improper performance (42.1%, $124 943 933), presenting medical condition was intervertebral disc disorder (20.6%, $54 223 206), and operative procedure performed involved the spinal cord and/or spinal canal (21.0%, $62 614 995). Eighty-five (22.91%) of the total neurosurgery claims resulted in patient death, resulting in $32 067 759 paid. Improper performance of the actual procedure was the most prevalent and highest total paid cause for patient death ($9 584 519)., Conclusion: From 2003 to 2012, we found that neurosurgery malpractice claims rank among one of the most costly and prevalent, with the average indemnities paid annually and the overall economic burden increasing. Diagnoses and procedures involving the spine, along with improper performance, were the most prevalent malpractice claims against neurosurgeons. Continued medical malpractice reform is essential to correct the overall health care cost burdens, and ultimately improve patient safety.

Military conflict and neurosurgery date back to antiquity. Neurosurgery's development is intimately linked with Harvey Cushing's military experience. Previous papers highlighted unique opportunities and socioeconomic challenges facing military neurosurgeons. Here, we provide objective data from military neurosurgeons surrounding these issues.Internet survey responses were solicited from current, separated, and retired military neurosurgeons regarding workforce issues and their perception of military neurosurgery.A total of 80.9% (98/121) of respondents enjoyed their military experience, 63.6% (77/121) were very pleased with their service; 97.4% (114/117) enjoyed treating military patients, and 78.2% (93/119) would recommend military service. Positives included feelings of patriotism (87.4%), development of camaraderie (71.4%), and deployment experience (93.8%).However, 76.5% of respondents noted concerns regarding military and civilian pay disparity. 37.5% were overwhelmed with administrative responsibilities, and over 50% desired higher case volume.Multivariate analysis showed those who failed to develop a sense of camaraderie were more likely to be dissatisfied (P = .02). Those still currently serving trended towards dissatisfaction (P = .08), and current military neurosurgeons were only 0.29 times as likely to recommend military service to another neurosurgeon as compared to those who were retired or separated (P < .024).Service as a military neurosurgeon is an overwhelmingly positive experience but opportunities exist for mechanisms to increase operative case load, reduce administrative responsibilities, and reduce military-civilian income disparity. Addressing these issues is important as current military neurosurgeons were more likely to be dissatisfied with their military experience and less likely to recommend military service to another neurosurgeon.

Rapid advancement of medical and surgical therapies, coupled with the recent preoccupation with limiting healthcare costs, makes a collision of the 2 objectives imminent. This article explains the value of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) in reconciling the 2 competing goals, and provides a brief introduction to evidence-based CEA techniques. The historical role of CEA in determining whether new neurosurgical strategies provide value for cost is summarized briefly, as are the limitations of the technique. Finally, the unique ability of the neurosurgical community to provide input to the CEA process is emphasized, as are the potential risks of leaving these important decisions in the hands of others.

Purpose: To examine the approximated financial outcomes of physicians by specialty and to determine whether these correlate with mean USMLE Step 1 scores., Methods: Specialty-specific data from the Association of American Medical Colleges Careers in Medicine website were analyzed for total length of training, mean USMLE Step 1 scores, average hours worked per week, and median clinical practice salary for physicians. Hourly wage and estimated net worth at retirement were calculated. Coefficients of determination (R2) were calculated to evaluate the relationships between hourly wage, annual salary, and estimated net worth at retirement with competitiveness as measured by USMLE Step 1 scores of matched residents., Results: Across all 37 specialties studied, the mean hourly wage was $136 ± $40, ranging from $78 (Geriatrics) to $249 (Neurosurgery). Mean weekly hours worked across all specialties was 54.6 ± 6.4, ranging from 43.4 (Pediatric Emergency Medicine) to 71.1 (Vascular Surgery). At retirement, the mean estimated net worth for all physicians was $4,517,600 ± $1,793,095, ranging from $1,927,779 (Child & Adolescent Psychiatry) to $8,947,885 (Neurosurgery). Step 1 scores, as a marker of specialty competiveness, correlate with specialty compensation - the strongest association was with hourly wage (R2 = 0.6678), then annual salary (R2 = 0.6424), and finally by estimated net worth at retirement (R2 = 0.6158)., Conclusion: In this study, mean Step 1 scores for each medical specialty were positively correlated with compensation, including absolute salary, hourly wage and estimated net worth at retirement.