Search

We followed 54 infants with in utero HIV after initiating very early antiretroviral treatment. At weeks 24 and 48, ≥80% had CD4 ≥1500 cells/mm3 and CD4% ≥25%. Routine Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis in the first year of life may not be necessary for all very early treated infants.Clinical trials registrationNCT02140255.

BackgroundWith increasing intention to treat HIV as early as possible, evidence to confirm the safety and therapeutic drug concentrations of a nevirapine-based antiretroviral regimen in the early neonatal period is needed. This study aims to establish dosing of nevirapine for very early treatment of HIV-exposed neonates at high risk of HIV acquisition.MethodsIMPAACT P1115 is a multinational phase 1/2 proof-of-concept study in which presumptive treatment for in-utero HIV infection is initiated within 48 h of birth in HIV-exposed neonates at high risk of HIV acquisition. Participants were neonates who were at least 34 weeks gestational age at birth and enrolled within 48 h of birth, born to women with presumed or confirmed HIV infection who had not received antiretrovirals during this pregnancy. The regimen consisted of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus nevirapine dosed at 6 mg/kg twice daily for term neonates (≥37 weeks gestational age) or 4 mg/kg twice daily for 1 week and 6 mg/kg twice daily thereafter for preterm neonates (34 to

Broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) may provide an alternative to standard antiretroviral treatment (ART) for controlling HIV-1 replication and may have immunotherapeutic effects against HIV-1 reservoirs. We conducted a prospective clinical trial with two HIV-1 bNAbs (VRC01LS and 10-1074) in children (n = 25) who had previously initiated small-molecule ART treatment before 7 days of age and who continued treatment for at least 96 weeks. Both bNAbs were dosed intravenously every 4 weeks, overlapping with ART for at least 8 weeks and then continued for up to 24 weeks or until detectable viremia of HIV-1 RNA rose above 400 copies per milliliter in the absence of ART. Eleven (44%) children maintained HIV-1 RNA below 400 copies per milliliter through 24 weeks of bNAb-only treatment; 14 (56%) had detectable viremia above 400 copies per milliliter at a median of 4 weeks. Archived HIV-1 provirus susceptible to 10-1074, lower birth HIV-1 DNA reservoir in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, sustained viral suppression throughout early life, and combined negative qualitative HIV-1 DNA polymerase chain reaction and negative HIV-1 serology at entry were associated with maintaining suppression on bNAbs alone. This proof-of-concept study suggests that bNAbs may represent a promising treatment modality for infants and children living with HIV-1. Future studies using newer bNAb combinations with greater breadth and potency are warranted. Editor's summary: Broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) have shown promise as a companion or alternative to antiretroviral treatment (ART) for HIV-1, although their efficacy in a pediatric population remains unclear. Here, Shapiro et al. report the results of a prospective clinical trial where children on ART from birth in Botswana were treated with two HIV-1 bNAbs, VRC01LS and 10-1074. The treatment was administered initially in combination with ART then alone. Eleven of 25 infants maintained viral suppression during the bNAb-only step; the authors found that these infants had more favorable HIV-1 reservoir characteristics, including a smaller initial proviral reservoir and susceptibility of those proviruses to bNAb neutralization. Together, these results highlight the potential of bNAb treatment for infants and children living with HIV-1.—Courtney Malo [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Statistical methods for controlling the type‐I error of hypothesis tests in adaptive group sequential clinical trials are well established and well understood. However, methods for obtaining statistically valid point estimates and confidence intervals for adaptive designs are not as well established or as well understood. At the end of an adaptive trial, one may calculate the repeated confidence interval (RCI), which provides conservative coverage of δ, or the backward image confidence interval (BWCI), which provides exact coverage of δ and is an extension of the stagewise adjusted confidence interval (SWCI, used in classical group sequential designs). The BWCI can also provide a median unbiased estimate (MUE) of δ. There is a need to better understand the coverage and possible biases associated with these methods. We conducted a simulation study exploring parameter estimation following sample size reestimation based on testing methods with strong control of type‐I error. Generally, the BWCI provided exact coverage, the naïve CI provided inconsistent coverage, and the RCI provided conservative coverage. Additionally, we note considerable asymmetry in the coverage from above/from below for the RCI, although we did not see any instance where the 95% RCI excluded the true parameter more than 2.5% on either side. At the end of an adaptive group sequential trial, we strongly recommend the use of the BWCI (and associated MUE), with the RCI computed during interim looks; the naïve CI should be avoided. These results and conclusions also hold true for classical group sequential designs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]