Search

Background: In 2009, researchers successfully implemented an intervention to decrease the inappropriate prescribing of multivitamin infusions (MVIs) in the emergency department (ED) for patients presenting with alcohol-related illnesses. Objective: The purposes of our study were to determine the impact of the 2009 intervention on hospital-wide prescribing practices of vitamin therapies for alcohol-related illnesses, and to evaluate its long-term sustainability. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at a 60,000-visit ED, 811-bed academically-affiliated tertiary referral hospital with an average census of 515 and 714 patients in 2009 and 2019, respectively. Patients were included if they presented to the ED from 2009 to 2019 with an alcohol-related illness as defined by ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. The primary outcome was the change in the monthly average of MVIs ordered inpatient within the first four months compared to the last four months of the study period. Secondary outcomes included changes in the mean distribution (MD) per month of thiamine administrations in the ED and inpatient setting, and MVIs ordered in the ED. Results: The MD of MVIs ordered per month decreased by 3.5% (95% CI −5.3, −1.7) in the inpatient setting and decreased by 1.4% (95% CI −2.5, −.3) in the ED from the beginning to the end of our study period. Conclusions: This study suggests the effects of an intervention made in the ED sustained impact over a 10-year timeframe, and decreased the use of MVIs in both the ED and hospital-wide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose The activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is a coagulation assay commonly utilized for monitoring therapeutic heparin anticoagulation. aPTT methods based on optical detection are vulnerable to spectral interference from hemolysis, icterus, lipemia, and other substances. Intravenous lipid emulsions of primarily 20% have been shown to interfere with multiple clinical laboratory assays, including those measuring aPTT by optical methods, but there is limited data on propofol's effect. The primary objective of this study was to determine the rate of interference of propofol with aPTT measurements in patients receiving both propofol and intravenous heparin. Methods A retrospective observational cohort study of intensive care unit patients who received concomitant propofol and heparin infusions (N = 38 patients) and whose heparin therapy was monitored by aPTT (N = 531 aPTTs) was conducted. Review of the electronic medical record was completed to obtain relevant clinical and laboratory data, while the laboratory information system was queried for analytical interference with the aPTT assay. Results A total of 109 aPTTs (21%) spanning 21 patients (55%) had documented aPTT interference. All 21 patients had at least one aPTT requiring ultracentrifugation prior to reporting, and 12 aPTTs from 4 patients were unreportable due to interference. Patients with and without aPTT interference received similar doses of propofol. None of the cases of aPTT interference were caused by hemolysis or hyperbilirubinemia. Conclusion A potential medication-assay interaction was observed in approximately half of patients who received concomitant propofol and heparin infusions and had aPTT measured for anticoagulation management. Sample ultracentrifugation removes the optical interference in most cases but significantly prolongs aPTT reporting and delays appropriate adjustments to heparin dosing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]