Search

Antibiotic-induced microbiome dysbiosis is widespread in oncology, adversely affecting outcomes and side effects of various cancer treatments, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapies. In this study, we observed that prior exposure to broad-spectrum ABX with extended anaerobic coverage like piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem was associated with worsened anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy survival outcomes in large B-cell lymphoma patients (n=422), compared to other ABX classes. In a discovery subset of these patients (n=67), we found that the use of these ABX was in turn associated with substantial dysbiosis of gut microbiome function, resulting in significant alterations of the gut and blood metabolome, including microbial effectors such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and other anionic metabolites, findings that were largely reproduced in an external validation cohort (n=58). Broader evaluation of circulating microbial metabolites revealed reductions in indole and cresol derivatives, as well as trimethylamine N-oxide, in patients who received ABX treatment (discovery n=40, validation n=28). These findings were recapitulated in an immune-competent CAR-T mouse model, where meropenem-induced dysbiosis led to a systemic dysmetabolome and decreased murine anti-CD19 CAR-T efficacy. Furthermore, we demonstrate that SCFAs can enhance the metabolic fitness of CAR-T cells, leading to improved tumor killing capacity. Together, these results suggest that broad-spectrum ABX deplete metabolically active commensals whose metabolites are essential for enhancing CAR-T efficacy, shedding light on the intricate relationship between ABX exposure, microbiome function and their impact on CAR-T cell efficacy. This highlights the potential for modulating the microbiome to augment CAR-T immunotherapy., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Hematology.)

Purpose: Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy that is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Little is known about the long-term survivorship after CAR T-cell therapy., Methods: We previously reported the results of 298 patients who were leukapheresed with the intent to receive standard-of-care axi-cel (n = 275 infused) after two or more previous lines of therapy at a median follow-up of 12.9 months. Here, we report extended follow-up of this cohort to a median of 58 months, with a focus on late survivorship events., Results: Among axi-cel-infused patients, progression-free survival at 5 years was 29% and overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 40%. The 5-year lymphoma-specific survival was 53% with infrequent late relapses. However, the 5-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 16.2%, with over half of NRM events occurring beyond 2 years. Patients who were 60 years and older had a lower risk of relapse ( P = .02), but a higher risk of NRM compared with patients younger than 60 years (NRM odds ratio, 4.5 [95% CI, 2.1 to 10.8]; P < .001). Late NRM was mainly due to infections and subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs). In total, SMNs occurred in 24 patients (9%), including therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (n = 15), solid tumors (n = 7), and unrelated lymphoid malignancies (n = 2)., Conclusion: In the standard-of-care setting, axi-cel exhibits outcomes consistent with those reported in clinical trials, with sustained, durable responses observed at the 5-year time point. However, late infections and the development of SMN are key survivorship issues that reduce long-term survival after CAR T-cell therapy, particularly in the elderly.

Introduction: The impact of bridging radiation therapy (bRT) for CAR T-cell therapy on absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) kinetics and treatment outcome is unknown., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adults with relapsed/refractory aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) who received bRT prior to CD-19 CAR-T between 11/2017-4/2023. The change in ALC (ALC Δ RT) was computed by subtracting ALC pre- and post-bRT. Percent bone marrow (%BM) irradiated was calculated by estimating skeletal BM distribution. PFS, DSS, and OS were modeled via Kaplan-Meier., Results: Fifty-one patients received bRT, of which 13 (25.5%) had bulky disease (≥7.5cm). The median bRT dose was 30Gy (range: 4-48Gy); 26 patients (51%) received ≥30Gy. Thirty-one patients (61%) received bRT comprehensively to all disease sites. The median cumulative %BM irradiated was 5.05% (range: 0-50%). At a median follow-up of 10.3 months (95% CI: 7.7-16.4), the 1-year OS, PFS, and DSS rates were 80% (95% CI: 66-99), 78% (64-87), and 82% (68-90), respectively. The incidence of ≥Grade 3 lymphopenia was 33% pre-RT and 68% post-RT, but recovered to 43% at the conditioning chemotherapy (CC) timepoint. There was no correlation between post-RT Grade ≥3 lymphopenia and the receipt of comprehensive bRT, combined modality bridging, ≥30Gy bRT, or bRT to ≥15% of BM (all p>0.2). Among patients with Grade 0-2 lymphopenia pre-RT, increased conversion to Grade ≥3 lymphopenia post-RT correlated with comprehensive or ≥30Gy bRT, but these factors did not impair ALC recovery at CC. There was no association between ALC Δ RT or post-RT ALC with 30 or 90 day response (p>0.25), DSS, PFS, or OS (p>0.3)., Conclusions: Lymphocyte change during bRT is not associated with CAR-T outcomes. Persistent cytopenia risk following bRT is not associated with bRT to ≥30Gy, ≥15% of BM, or comprehensive coverage. While bRT can be delivered safely, we urge careful treatment planning when incorporating into pre-CAR-T regimens., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) involving the gastrointestinal (GI) organs is rare, and real-world outcomes after combined modality therapy (CMT) with systemic therapy (ST) and radiotherapy (RT) are not well-characterized, particularly in the contemporary era. We characterized outcomes in a large cohort of GI-DLBCL patients treated with ST alone or CMT., Methods: Patients with GI-DLBCL treated at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models estimated survival. Multivariable analyses were conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model., Results: Of 204 patients, gastric involvement was most common (63%). Most presented with early-stage disease (61%). All patients received ST and 65 patients (32%) received RT, 88% as part of first-line CMT. Median dose was 36 Gy (IQR 30.6-39.6) in 18 fractions (IQR 17-22). Median follow-up was 46 months. Five-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 88% and 84%, respectively; complete response (CR) rate was 82%. Improved OS associated with low IPI ( p =0.001), fewer chemotherapy lines ( p <0.001), early stage ( p <0.006), and CR ( p <0.001). Survival did not differ by RT receipt ( p >0.25). Only early stage and CR correlated with improved OS on multivariable analysis. Stomach-directed RT vs. RT to other sites correlated with improved PFS and OS ( p <0.04). Patients with early stage DLBCL treated with CMT in the post-rituximab era had equivalent OS vs. ST alone, even with fewer chemotherapy cycles ( p <0.02; median of 4 with RT vs. 6 cycles without). Fifty patients had bulky disease (≥7.5 cm), of whom 18 (36%) had early stage disease. Among patients with bulky disease, 5 (10%) developed relapse at the initial site of disease bulk. Four of the 5 patients did not receive consolidative radiation. Among these 4 patients, 3 relapsed only in their initial site of bulky disease. Of 191 patients with luminal GI-DLBCL, n =4 (2.1%) developed perforation; only one received RT. Acute Grade 3 toxicities were reported in 41.2% of patients, and 12 (5.8%) patients had late Grade 3 toxicities, 99% attributed to chemotherapy., Conclusion: GI-DLBCL patients have favorable outcomes after CMT with minimal late toxicity. CMT may be offered with abridged systemic regimens with equivalent outcomes. Stomach directed-RT may mitigate relapse risk associated with incomplete disease response or bulky disease., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Manzar, Cha, Corrigan, Yoder, Schrank, Nasr, Chihara, Castillo, Nair, Jain, Neelapu, Rodriguez, Strati, Nastoupil, Gunther, Dabaja, Pinnix, Wu and Fang.)

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Most patients treated with axi-cel experience cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and/or adverse neurologic events (NEs). To explore potential approaches for reducing CAR T-cell-related toxicities with axi-cel, several safety expansion cohorts were added to the pivotal ZUMA-1 trial. ZUMA-1 Cohort 3 was an exploratory safety cohort that investigated the use of the IL-6 receptor-blocking antibody tocilizumab and anticonvulsant levetiracetam as prophylaxis against CRS and NEs in patients treated with axi-cel. Patients with R/R LBCL were enrolled in Cohort 3 and received conditioning chemotherapy on d -5 through -3 followed by a single infusion of axi-cel (2 × 10 6 cells/kg) on d 0. Prophylactic tocilizumab (8 mg/kg) was administered 48 h after axi-cel infusion. Primary endpoints were incidence and severity of CRS and NEs. Key secondary endpoints included the incidence of adverse events, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and biomarker analyses (eg, circulating CAR T cells, cytokines, chemokines). Forty-two patients were enrolled in Cohort 3, 38 of whom received axi-cel. In the 24-month analysis, any-grade CRS and NEs occurred in 92% and 87% of patients, and Grade ≥3 CRS and NEs occurred in 3% and 42% of patients, respectively. One Grade 5 NE (cerebral edema) occurred. With 24-mo minimum follow-up, the ORR was 63%, and 39.5% of patients had ongoing response. With 48-month follow-up, median OS was 34.8 mo (95% CI, 5.4-not estimable). CAR T-cell expansion in ZUMA-1 Cohort 3 was comparable with pivotal Cohorts 1 and 2. Consistent with tocilizumab-mediated inhibition of IL-6R, serum IL-6 levels were increased relative to Cohorts 1 and 2. Grade ≥3 NEs were associated with elevated IL-6 levels, proinflammatory cytokines, and myeloid cells in the cerebrospinal fluid. Based on these findings, prophylactic tocilizumab is not recommended to prevent CAR T-cell-related adverse events, and beneficial effects of prophylactic levetiracetam remain uncertain in patients with R/R LBCL., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Rituximab and lenalidomide is a preferred option for relapsed indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Obinutuzumab may be a superior combination partner with lenalidomide given enhanced antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity and phagocytosis compared to rituximab. Our aim was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose, safety, and activity of lenalidomide in combination with fixed dose of obinutuzumab in relapsed and refractory indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma., Methods: In this single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 trial, we enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory WHO Grade 1-3A follicular lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma and small lymphocytic lymphoma and adequate performance status (ECOG 0-2) at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. We excluded patients with evidence of ongoing transformation to aggressive lymphoma. During phase 1, 1000 mg intravenous obinutuzumab was administered with three predefined levels of oral lenalidomide in a 3 + 3 dose escalation design to establish lenalidomide 20 mg as the recommended phase 2 dose. During phase 2, patients received induction therapy with six 28-day cycles of lenalidomide 20 mg with intravenous obinutuzumab 1000 mg. In accordance with our prior experience with lenalidomide plus rituximab, patients who were responding to the combination could receive up to 6 additional cycles (up to 12 cycles in total) of combination therapy. Dosing of obinutuzumab was continued in all responding patients after cycle 6 every 2 months for a total of 30 months from the start of therapy. The decision of number of cycles of combination therapy beyond 6 was at discretion of the investigator and was included to allow individualisation of therapy to maximise response while minimising exposure. The co-primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and overall response, defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a complete or partial response in relapsed and refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma at the end of induction therapy, according to Cheson and colleagues (2007 criteria). The secondary endpoints were complete response after induction therapy and time to event endpoints including time to progression, progression free survival, and overall survival. Analyses were intent to treat in the efficacy cohort and per-treated in the safety population in all patients who received at least one dose of either investigational agent. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01995669., Findings: Between June 03, 2014, and 07 March 2019, we completed planned enrolment, and 66 patients started therapy including 9 patients in phase 1 and 57 patients in phase 2. All patients were evaluated for safety and the 60 patients treated at the recommended phase 2 dose of lenalidomide 20 mg were evaluable for activity. Grade 3-4 haematological toxicities included neutropenia 21% (14/66) and thrombocytopenia 11% (7/66) with no cases of febrile neutropenia. Grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicities included lung infection 8% (5/66), fatigue 8% (5/66) and rash 6% (4/66). By Cheson 2007 criteria, 90% (54/60, 95% CI: 79-96) achieved an overall response at the end of induction meeting the prespecified activity endpoint. Complete responses were seen in 33% (20/60, 95% CI: 22-47) at the end of induction. Median progression free survival, time to progression and overall survival have not been reached after median follow-up of 41.7 months. Estimated 4-year progression free survival rates were 55% (95% CI: 42-73), time to progression of 56% (95% CI: 43-74) and overall survival of 84% (95% CI: 74-95)., Interpretation: Our findings suggest that oral lenalidomide with obinutuzumab is safe and highly active in patients with relapsed and refractory indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and is associated with prolonged remission duration. The study is limited by the lack of a control arm leading to cross-trial comparisons to evaluate activity. Future randomised trials comparing this regime to rituximab and lenalidomide are warranted., Funding: Genentech and an MD Anderson Core grant., Competing Interests: AG: Received honorarium for participation in advisory board for Kite Pharma. CKC: has received honorarium for participation in advisory boards with Kite/Gilead. LF: No competing interests. NF: has received research support from Celgene for undertaking the preclinical and clinical trials of lenalidomide. PS: consultancy for Kite, a Gilead Company, Roche-Genentech, Hutchinson MediPharma, ADC Therapeutics, Incyte Morphosis and TG Therapeutics; research funding from Sobi Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca-Acerta, ALX Oncology, and ADC Therapeutics. Research: Salary support from the Leukemia Lymphoma Society Scholar in Clinical Research Career Development Program, the Sabin Fellowship Award, and by Gilead Scholar in Clinical Research Award. FJH: No competing interests. LEF: No competing interests. JRW: Consulting and Research Funding—BMS ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Kite, Janssen, Kymera, Merck, Morphosys/Incyte, Novartis. Consulting: Abbvie, GenMab, Regeneron, and SeaGen. CO: No competing interests. JA: No competing interests. RN: Consulting–Abbvie, Incyte. Honorarium for Educational Events—AstraZeneca, ScienciaCME, MedPage, Curio Science. Travel Support for Attending Meetings–Viracta Therapeutics, Inc. Studio E.R. Congressi s.r.l. World Health Communications, Ltd. RES: Grants–Seagen, BMS, GSK and Rafael Pharmaceuticals. SSN—has received research support from Kite/Gilead, Cellectis, Poseida, Merk, Acerta, Karus, BMS, Unum Therapeutics, Allogene, and Precision Biosciences; served as consultant and advisory board member for Kite/Gliead, Celgene, Novartis, Unum Therapeutics, Pfizer, Merck, Precision Biosciences, Cell Medica, Incyte, Allogene, Calibr, and Legend Biotech; has patents related to cell therapy. CF: Consultant: Abbvie, Bayer, BeiGene, Celgene, Denovo Biopharma, Foresight Diagnostics, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Gilead, Karyopharm, N-Power Medicine, Pharmacyclics/Janssen, SeaGen, Spectrum. Stock Options: Foresight Diagnostics, N-Power MedicineResearch Funding: 4D, Abbvie, Acerta, Adaptimmune, Allogene, Amgen, Bayer, Celgene, Cellectis EMD, Gilead, Genentech/Roche, Guardant, Iovance, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Kite, Morphosys, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Sanofi, Takeda, TG Therapeutics, Xencor, Ziopharm, Burroughs Wellcome Fund, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, National Cancer Institute, V Foundation, Leukemia and Lymphoma Sociery, Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas: CPRIT Scholar in Cancer Research. LJN: has received honorarium for participation in advisory boards/consulting from Abbvie, ADC Therapeutics, BMS/Celgene, Caribou Biosciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Epizyme, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Janssen, Incyte, Ipsen, Novartis, and Takeda; research support from BMS/Celgene, Caribou Biosciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Epizyme, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Gilead/Kite, IGM Biosciences, Ipsen, Janssen, Novartis, and Takeda., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: Given the favourable prognosis of patients with gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, treatment-related toxicity should be minimised. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 4 Gy radiotherapy given in a response-adapted approach., Methods: We conducted a single-centre, single-arm, prospective trial at MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA) of response-adapted ultra-low-dose radiotherapy. Eligible patients were 18 years or older and had newly diagnosed or relapsed Helicobacter pylori-negative gastric MALT lymphoma, with stage I-IV disease. Given the expected low toxicity profile of treatment, performance status was not an exclusion criterion. Patients received external beam photon-based radiotherapy for a total dose of 4 Gy in two fractions. Patients with a complete response to 4 Gy via endoscopy and imaging at 3-4 months were observed; patients with a partial response were re-evaluated in 6-9 months. Residual disease at 9-13 months or stable or progressive disease at any time required additional treatment with 20 Gy. The primary endpoint was gastric complete response at 1 year (second evaluation timepoint) after 4 Gy treatment. All analyses were performed as intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03680586) and is complete and closed to enrolment., Findings: Between March 27, 2019, and Oct 12, 2021, we enrolled 24 eligible patients. The median age of participants was 67 years (IQR 58-74; range 40-85); 15 (63%) were female and nine (37%) male; 18 (75%) were White, four (17%) Asian, and two (8%) Hispanic; 20 (83%) had stage I disease, one (4%) stage II, and three (13%) stage IV. Median follow-up time was 36 months (IQR 26-42). 20 patients (83%) had a complete response to 4 Gy (16 at 3-4 months, four at 9-13 months); two patients received 20 Gy for symptomatic stable disease at 3-4 months and two for residual disease at 9-13 months; all had a complete response. The 3-year local control rate was 96% (95% CI 88-100), with one local relapse at 14 months after 4 Gy radiotherapy salvaged successfully with 20 Gy. One patient with stage IV disease had a distant relapse. The most common adverse events were grade 1 nausea (nine [38%] of 24 patients who received 4 Gy and two [50%] of four patients who received 20 Gy) and grade 1 abdominal pain (five [21%] of 24 and zero of four, respectively). No grade 3 or worse adverse events were noted, including no treatment-related deaths., Interpretation: Most patients had a complete response after 4 Gy radiotherapy; all who required an additional 20 Gy had a complete response within 12 months. This response-adapted strategy could be used to select patients who would benefit from additional radiotherapy and spare others potential associated toxicity., Funding: National Cancer Institute., Competing Interests: Declarations of interests CCP has received research support from Merck. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Introduction: Studies have compared chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies and salvage chemotherapy in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients, but further evidence of their relative effectiveness is warranted., Methods: Our systematic review identified studies comparing efficacy and safety outcomes of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) trials to salvage chemotherapy cohorts in LBCL patients with ≥2 prior lines of treatment; and an extended evidence network included indirect comparisons comparing CAR T-cell therapies. We conducted network meta-analyzes using Bayesian hierarchical modeling., Results: Three studies comparing ZUMA-1 (axi-cel), TRANSCEND (liso-cel) and JULIET (tisa-cel) trials to salvage chemotherapy within the SCHOLAR-1 cohort were identified. Axi-cel (odds ratio [OR]:5.63; 95% credible interval [CrI]:2.66-12.42) and liso-cel (OR:4.26; 95%CrI:2.33-7.93) showed a significant increased overall response rate compared to tisa-cel, but not to one-another. Axi-cel demonstrated significant improvements in overall survival relative to liso-cel (hazard ratio [HR]:0.54; 95%CrI:0.37-0.79) and tisa-cel (HR:0.47; 95%CrI:0.26-0.88). Higher rates of grade ≥3 neurological events were observed with axi-cel than with tisa-cel and liso-cel., Conclusions: We highlight important differences in clinical outcomes between CAR T-cell therapies. Axi-cel demonstrated improved overall survival compared to tisa-cel and liso-cel, and both axi-cel and liso-cel showed higher response rates compared to tisa-cel.

Complications occurring after lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC) may delay chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell infusion. The effect of these delays on clinical outcomes is unclear. We performed a retrospective analysis of 240 patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma treated with standard-of-care axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and identified 40 patients (16.7%) who had delay in axi-cel infusion. Of these, 85% had delay due to infection. At time of LDC initiation, patients with delayed infusion had lower absolute neutrophil count (P=0.006), lower platelets (P=0.004), lower hemoglobin (P<0.001) and higher C-reactive protein (P=0.001) than those with on-time infusion. Patients with delayed infusion had lower day 30 overall response rates (59.0% vs. 79.4%; P=0.008) and shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) (3.5 vs. 8.2 months; P=0.002) and overall survival (7.8 vs. 26.4 months; P=0.046) than those with on-time infusion. The association with PFS was maintained on multivariate analysis. There was also an association between extent of delay and survival, with shorter median PFS in patients who had delays of 2-5 days (1.8 vs. 8.2 months; P=0.001) and >5 days (4.6 vs. 8.2 months; P=0.036), but not 1 day (5.7 vs. 8.2 months; P=0.238). Following propensity score matching, patients with delayed infusion continued to have shorter median PFS (3.5 vs. 6.0 months; P=0.015). Levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines on day of infusion were significantly higher in patients with delayed infusion. Together, these findings suggest that delays in CAR T-cell administration after initiation of LDC are associated with inferior outcomes. Further studies are needed to guide strategies to improve efficacy in such patients.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) in trials has demonstrated favorable efficacy compared with historical controls after ≥2 lines of therapy for the treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). Herein, we compared the real-world effectiveness of axi-cel with efficacy and effectiveness of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) in patients aged ≥65 years and patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 2. A total of 1146 patients treated with commercial axi-cel for R/R LBCL with ≥2 lines of prior therapy were included from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Research prospective observational study, and 469 patients treated with CIT for R/R LBCL after ≥2 lines of prior therapy were included from SCHOLAR-1 (an international, multicohort, retrospective study). After propensity score matching, at a median follow-up of 24 months for patients receiving axi-cel and 60 months for patients receiving CIT, 12-month overall survival rates were 62% and 28%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.24-0.37]). Objective response rate (ORR) was 76% (complete response [CR] rate 58%) in patients receiving axi-cel versus 28% (CR rate 16%) for those receiving CIT. A 57% difference in ORR (55% difference in CR rate) favoring axi-cel over CIT was observed among patients aged ≥65 years. Increased magnitude of benefit in response rates for axi-cel versus CIT was also observed among patients with ECOG PS = 2. These findings further support the broader use of axi-cel in older patients and patients with ECOG PS = 2 with R/R LBCL., (© 2024 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) are indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHL). Median survival for iNHL is approximately 20 years. Because standard treatments are not curative, patients often receive multiple lines of therapy with associated toxicity-rationally designed, combination therapies with curative potential are needed. The immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide was evaluated in combination with rituximab for the frontline treatment of FL in the phase 3 RELEVANCE study. Ibrutinib, an oral Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is active in NHL and was evaluated in combination with lenalidomide, rituximab, and ibrutinib (IRR) in a phase 1 study., Methods: The authors conducted an open-label, phase 2 clinical trial of IRR for previously untreated FL and MZL. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 24 months., Results: This study included 48 participants with previously untreated FL grade 1-3a (N = 38), or MZL (N = 10). Participants received 12, 28-day cycles of lenalidomide (15 mg, days 1-21 cycle 1; 20 mg, cycles 2-12), rituximab (375 mg/m 2 weekly in cycle 1; day 1 cycles 2-12), and ibrutinib 560 mg daily. With a median follow-up of 65.3 months, the estimated PFS at 24 months was 78.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.0%-91.4%) and 60-month PFS was 59.7% (95% CI, 46.6%-76.4%). One death occurred unrelated to disease progression. Grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 64.6%, including 50% with grade 3-4 rash., Conclusions: IRR is highly active as frontline therapy for FL and MZL. Compared to historical results with lenalidomide and rituximab, PFS is similar with higher grade 3-4 toxicity, particularly rash. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02532257)., (© 2023 American Cancer Society.)

Abstract: During the manufacturing period of autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, patients may experience a decline in their condition due to cancer progression. In this study, we investigated the impact of bridging therapy (BT) on the outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received antilymphoma treatment between leukapheresis and axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) infusion. We conducted our analysis using data from the multicenter US Lymphoma CAR-T Consortium, with a median follow-up of 33 months (range, 4.3-42.1). Out of the 298 patients who underwent leukapheresis, 275 patients received axi-cel. A total 52% of patients (n = 143) who received BT had a higher baseline risk profile than patients who did not receive BT, and these patients, as a group, had inferior outcomes compared with those who did not receive BT. However, after propensity score matching between the 2 groups, there were no statistically significant differences in overall response rate (77% vs 87%; P = .13), complete response rate (58% vs 70%; P = .1), progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; P = .23), and overall survival (HR, 1.39; P=.09) between the BT group and the no-BT group, respectively. Analyzing the effects of BT in the whole cohort that underwent leukapheresis regardless of receiving axi-cel (intention-to-treat analysis) showed similar results. Radiation BT resulted in outcomes similar to those observed with nonradiation BT. Our findings suggest that BT may be safe without a significant impact on long-term survival for patients who require disease stabilization during the manufacturing period. Moreover, our results suggest that there is no clear advantage to using radiation-based BT over nonradiation-based BT., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Abstract: Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL). Approval was supported by the phase 2, multicenter, single-arm ZUMA-5 study of axi-cel for patients with R/R indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL; N = 104), including FL and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). In the primary analysis (median follow-up, 17.5 months), the overall response rate (ORR) was 92% (complete response rate, 74%). Here, we report long-term outcomes from ZUMA-5. Eligible patients with R/R iNHL after ≥2 lines of therapy underwent leukapheresis, followed by lymphodepleting chemotherapy and axi-cel infusion (2 × 106 CAR T cells per kg). The primary end point was ORR, assessed in this analysis by investigators in all enrolled patients (intent-to-treat). After median follow-up of 41.7 months in FL (n = 127) and 31.8 months in MZL (n = 31), ORR was comparable with that of the primary analysis (FL, 94%; MZL, 77%). Median progression-free survival was 40.2 months in FL and not reached in MZL. Medians of overall survival were not reached in either disease type. Grade ≥3 adverse events of interest that occurred after the prior analyses were largely in recently treated patients. Clinical and pharmacokinetic outcomes correlated negatively with recent exposure to bendamustine and high metabolic tumor volume. After 3 years of follow-up in ZUMA-5, axi-cel demonstrated continued durable responses, with very few relapses beyond 2 years, and manageable safety in patients with R/R iNHL. The ZUMA-5 study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03105336., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD19 mediate potent and durable effects in B-cell malignancies. However, antigen loss or downregulation is a frequent cause of resistance. Here, we report development of a novel CAR T-cell therapy product to target CD79b, a pan B-cell antigen, widely expressed in most B-cell lymphomas., Methods: We generated a novel anti-CD79b monoclonal antibody by hybridoma method. The specificity of the antibody was determined by testing against isogenic cell lines with human CD79b knock-in or knock-out. A single-chain variable fragment derived from the monoclonal antibody was used to make a panel of CD79b-targeting CAR molecules containing various hinge, transmembrane, and co-stimulatory domains. These were lentivirally transduced into primary T cells and tested for antitumor activity in in vitro and in vivo B-cell lymphoma models., Results: We found that the novel anti-CD79b monoclonal antibody was highly specific and bound only to human CD79b and no other cell surface protein. In testing the various CD79b-targeting CAR molecules, superior antitumor efficacy in vitro and in vivo was found for a CAR consisting CD8α hinge and transmembrane domains, an OX40 co-stimulatory domain, and a CD3ζ signaling domain. This CD79b CAR specifically recognized human CD79b-expressing lymphoma cell lines but not CD79b knock-out cell lines. CD79b CAR T cells, generated from T cells from either healthy donors or patients with lymphoma, proliferated, produced cytokines, degranulated, and exhibited robust cytotoxic activity in vitro against CD19 + and CD19 - lymphoma cell lines and patient-derived lymphoma tumors relapsing after prior CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. Furthermore, CD79b CAR T cells were highly efficient at eradicating pre-established lymphoma tumors in vivo in three aggressive lymphoma xenograft models, including two cell line-derived xenografts and one patient-derived xenograft. Notably, these CAR T cells did not demonstrate any significant tonic signaling activity or markers of exhaustion., Conclusion: Our results indicated that this novel CD79b CAR T-cell therapy product has robust antitumor activity against B-cell lymphomas. These results supported initiation of a phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate this product in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphomas., Competing Interests: Competing interests: FC has intellectual property related to cell therapy. JC has intellectual property related to cell therapy. JL has intellectual property related to cell therapy. FV receives research support from Allogene and Geron corporation. SSN received research support from Kite/Gilead, BMS, Allogene, Precision Biosciences, Adicet Bio, and Sana Biotechnology; served as Advisory Board Member/Consultant for Kite/Gilead, Merck, Sellas Life Sciences, Athenex, Allogene, Incyte, Adicet Bio, BMS, Bluebird Bio, Fosun Kite, Sana Biotechnology, Caribou, Astellas Pharma, Morphosys, Janssen, Chimagen, ImmunoACT, Orna Therapeutics, Takeda, and Synthekine; has stock options from Longbow Immunotherapy; and has intellectual property related to cell therapy., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T) therapy is highly effective in relapsed/refractory large B cell lymphoma (rrLBCL) but is associated with toxicities that delay recovery. While the biological mechanisms of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity have been investigated, the pathophysiology is poorly understood for prolonged cytopenia, defined as grade ≥3 cytopenia lasting beyond 30 days after CAR T infusion. We performed single-cell RNA sequencing of bone marrow samples from healthy donors and rrLBCL patients with or without prolonged cytopenia and identified significantly increased frequencies of clonally expanded CX3CR1 hi cytotoxic T cells, expressing high interferon (IFN)-γ and cytokine signaling gene sets, associated with prolonged cytopenia. In line with this, we found that hematopoietic stem cells from these patients expressed IFN-γ response signatures. IFN-γ deregulates hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation and can be targeted with thrombopoietin agonists or IFN-γ-neutralizing antibodies, highlighting a potential mechanism-based approach for the treatment of CAR T-associated prolonged cytopenia., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests M.R.G. reports research funding from Sanofi, Kite/Gilead, Abbvie, and Allogene; consulting for Abbvie; honoraria/consulting fees from Tessa Therapeutics, Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, and Abbvie; and stock ownership of KDAc Therapeutics. S.S.N. received research support from Kite/Gilead, BMS, Cellectis, Poseida, Allogene, Unum Therapeutics, Precision Biosciences, and Adicet Bio; served as Advisory Board Member/Consultant for Kite/Gilead, Merck, Novartis, Sellas Life Sciences, Athenex, Allogene, Incyte, Adicet Bio, BMS, Legend Biotech, Bluebird Bio, Fosun Kite, Sana Biotechnology, Caribou, Astellas Pharma, Morphosys, Janssen, Chimagen, ImmunoACT, and Orna Therapeutics; has received royalty income from Takeda Pharmaceuticals; has stock options from Longbow Immunotherapy, Inc; and has intellectual property related to cell therapy. P.S. received research support from Sobi, AstraZeneca/Acerta, ALX Oncology, and ADC Therapeutics; and served as Advisory Board Member/Consultant for Kite/Gilead, Roche/Genentech, Incyte/Morphosys, ADC Therapeutics, TG Therapeutics, Hutchinson/MediPharma, and AstraZeneca/Acerta. R.N. reports speakership for Incyte. J.R.W. reports consulting for Kite/Gilead, BMS, Novartis, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, Morphosys/Incyte, Janssen, ADC Therapeutics, Calithera, Kymera, Merck, MonteRosa, SeaGen, and Abbvie; and research funding from Kite/Gilead, BMS, Novartis, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, Morphosys/Incyte, Janssen, ADC Therapeutics, Calithera, and Kymera. S.A. reports research funding from Seattle Genetics, Merck, Xencor, Chimagen, and Tessa Therapeutics; advisory board membership or consulting for Tessa Therapeutic’s, Chimagen, ADC Therapeutics, and KITE/Gilead; and data safety monitoring board membership for Myeloid Therapeutics. L.J.N. reports honoraria for participation on advisory boards from ADC Therapeutics, Atara, BMS, Caribou Biosciences, Epizyme, Genentech, Genmab, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, Morphosys, Novartis, and Takeda; research support from BMS, Caribou Biosciences, Epizyme, Genentech, Genmab, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, IGM Biosciences, Novartis, and Takeda; and serves on a DSMB for DeNovo, Genentech, MEI, and Takeda. C.R.F. reports consulting for Abbvie, Bayer, BeiGene, Celgene, Denovo Biopharma, Foresight Diagnostics, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Gilead, Karyopharm, N-Power Medicine, Pharmacyclics/Janssen, SeaGen, and Spectrum; research funding from 4D, Abbvie, Acerta, Adaptimmune, Allogene, Amgen, Bayer, Celgene, Cellectis EMD, Gilead, Genentech/Roche, Guardant, Iovance, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Kite, Morphosys, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Sanofi, Takeda, TG Therapeutics, Xencor, Ziopharm, Burroughs Wellcome Fund, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, National Cancer Institute, V Foundation, and Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas: CPRIT Scholar in Cancer Research; and stock ownership in Foresight Diagnostics, N-Power Medicine. F.V. reports research funding from Allogene and Geron corporation; and honoraria from i3Health, Elsevier, America Registry of Pathology, Society of Hematology Oncology, and CRISP Therapeutics. K.T. reports consulting for Symbio Pharaceuticals and honoraria from Mission Bio. R.E.S. reports research funding from SeaGen, BMS, GSK, and Rafael Pharmaceuticals., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

T cell-mediated hyperinflammatory responses, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), are now well-established toxicities of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. As the field of CAR T cells advances, however, there is increasing recognition that hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)-like toxicities following CAR T cell infusion are occurring broadly across patient populations and CAR T cell constructs. Importantly, these HLH-like toxicities are often not as directly associated with CRS and/or its severity as initially described. This emergent toxicity, however ill-defined, is associated with life-threatening complications, creating an urgent need for improved identification and optimal management. With the goal of improving patient outcomes and formulating a framework to characterize and study this HLH-like syndrome, we established an American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy panel composed of experts in primary and secondary HLH, pediatric and adult HLH, infectious disease, rheumatology and hematology, oncology, and cellular therapy. Through this effort, we provide an overview of the underlying biology of classical primary and secondary HLH, explore its relationship with similar manifestations following CAR T cell infusions, and propose the term "immune effector cell-associated HLH-like syndrome (IEC-HS)" to describe this emergent toxicity. We also delineate a framework for identifying IEC-HS and put forward a grading schema that can be used to assess severity and facilitate cross-trial comparisons. Additionally, given the critical need to optimize outcomes for patients experiencing IEC-HS, we provide insight into potential treatment approaches and strategies to optimize supportive care and delineate alternate etiologies that should be considered in a patient presenting with IEC-HS. By collectively defining IEC-HS as a hyperinflammatory toxicity, we can now embark on further study of the pathophysiology underlying this toxicity profile and make strides toward a more comprehensive assessment and treatment approach., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease, and the cellular and molecular evolution from precursor conditions, including monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma, is incompletely understood. Here, we combine single-cell RNA and B cell receptor sequencing from fifty-two patients with myeloma precursors in comparison with myeloma and normal donors. Our comprehensive analysis reveals early genomic drivers of malignant transformation, distinct transcriptional features, and divergent clonal expansion in hyperdiploid versus non-hyperdiploid samples. Additionally, we observe intra-patient heterogeneity with potential therapeutic implications and identify distinct patterns of evolution from myeloma precursor disease to myeloma. We also demonstrate distinctive characteristics of the microenvironment associated with specific genomic changes in myeloma cells. These findings add to our knowledge about myeloma precursor disease progression, providing valuable insights into patient risk stratification, biomarker discovery, and possible clinical applications., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests H.C.L. has received consulting fees from Adaptive Biotechnologies, Celgene, Pimera, and Takeda and research support from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, and Takeda. S.S.N. has received research support from Kite/Gilead, Celgene, Cellectis, Poseida, Merck, Acerta, Karus, and Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) and has served as consultant and advisory board member for Kite/Gilead, Celgene, Novartis, Unum Therapeutics, Pfizer, CellMedica, and Merck. R.Z.O. has received consulting fees from Amgen, Inc., BMS, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Biotech, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Molecular Partners, Neoleukin Corporation, Oncopeptides AB, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. Clinical research support has come from CARsgen Therapeutics, Celgene, Exelixis, Janssen Biotech, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc., while laboratory research support has come from Asylia Therapeutics, Inc., BioTheryX, and Heidelberg Pharma. E.E.M. has received research support from Sanofi, Quest Diagnostics, Novartis, JW Pharma, Merck, and GSK and consultant fees from Takeda, Celgene, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, BMS, and GSK., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although trastuzumab and other HER2-targeted therapies have significantly improved survival in patients with HER2 overexpressed or amplified (HER2+) breast cancer, a significant proportion of patients do not respond or eventually develop clinical resistance. Strategies to reverse trastuzumab resistance remain a high clinical priority. We were the first to report the role of CXCR4 in trastuzumab resistance. The present study aims to explore the therapeutic potential of targeting CXCR4 and better understand the associated mechanisms., Methods: Immunofluorescent staining, confocal microscopy analysis, and immunoblotting were used to analyze CXCR4 expression. BrdU incorporation assays and flow cytometry were used to analyze dynamic CXCR4 expression. Three-dimensional co-culture (tumor cells/breast cancer-associated fibroblasts/human peripheral blood mononuclear cells) or antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity assay was used to mimic human tumor microenvironment, which is necessary for testing therapeutic effects of CXCR4 inhibitor or trastuzumab. The FDA-approved CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100, trastuzumab, and docetaxel chemotherapy were used to evaluate therapeutic efficacy in vitro and in vivo. Reverse phase protein array and immunoblotting were used to discern the associated molecular mechanisms., Results: Using a panel of cell lines and patient breast cancer samples, we confirmed CXCR4 drives trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer and further demonstrated the increased CXCR4 expression in trastuzumab-resistant cells is associated with cell cycle progression with a peak in the G2/M phases. Blocking CXCR4 with AMD3100 inhibits cell proliferation by downregulating mediators of G2-M transition, leading to G2/M arrest and abnormal mitosis. Using a panel of trastuzumab-resistant cell lines and an in vivo established trastuzumab-resistant xenograft mouse model, we demonstrated that targeting CXCR4 with AMD3100 suppresses tumor growth in vitro and in vivo, and synergizes with docetaxel., Conclusions: Our findings support CXCR4 as a novel therapeutic target and a predictive biomarker for trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

In phase 2 of ZUMA-1, a single-arm, multicenter, registrational trial, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy demonstrated durable responses at 2 years in patients with refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Here, we assessed outcomes in ZUMA-1 after 5 years of follow-up. Eligible adults received lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by axi-cel (2 × 106 cells per kg). Investigator-assessed response, survival, safety, and pharmacokinetics were assessed in patients who had received treatment. The objective response rate in these 101 patients was 83% (58% complete response rate); with a median follow-up of 63.1 months, responses were ongoing in 31% of patients at data cutoff. Median overall survival (OS) was 25.8 months, and the estimated 5-year OS rate was 42.6%. Disease-specific survival (excluding deaths unrelated to disease progression) estimated at 5 years was 51.0%. No new serious adverse events or deaths related to axi-cel were observed after additional follow-up. Peripheral blood B cells were detectable in all evaluable patients at 3 years with polyclonal B-cell recovery in 91% of patients. Ongoing responses at 60 months were associated with early CAR T-cell expansion. In conclusion, this 5-year follow-up analysis of ZUMA-1 demonstrates sustained overall and disease-specific survival, with no new safety signals in patients with refractory LBCL. Protracted B-cell aplasia was not required for durable responses. These findings support the curative potential of axi-cel in a subset of patients with aggressive B-cell lymphomas. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, as #NCT02348216., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Purpose: Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) is an autologous CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). This therapy was approved on the basis of the single-arm phase II ZUMA-2 trial, which showed best overall and complete response rates of 91% and 68%, respectively. We report clinical outcomes with brexu-cel in the standard-of-care setting for the approved indication., Patients and Methods: Patients who underwent leukapheresis between August 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021, at 16 US institutions, with an intent to manufacture commercial brexu-cel for relapsed/refractory MCL, were included. Patient data were collected for analyses of responses, outcomes, and toxicities as per standard guidelines., Results: Of 189 patients who underwent leukapheresis, 168 (89%) received brexu-cel infusion. Of leukapheresed patients, 79% would not have met ZUMA-2 eligibility criteria. Best overall and complete response rates were 90% and 82%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 14.3 months after infusion, the estimates for 6- and 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) were 69% (95% CI, 61 to 75) and 59% (95% CI, 51 to 66), respectively. The nonrelapse mortality was 9.1% at 1 year, primarily because of infections. Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 8% and 32%, respectively. In univariable analysis, high-risk simplified MCL international prognostic index, high Ki-67, TP53 aberration, complex karyotype, and blastoid/pleomorphic variant were associated with shorter PFS after brexu-cel infusion. Patients with recent bendamustine exposure (within 24 months before leukapheresis) had shorter PFS and overall survival after leukapheresis in intention-to-treat univariable analysis., Conclusion: In the standard-of-care setting, the efficacy and toxicity of brexu-cel were consistent with those reported in the ZUMA-2 trial. Tumor-intrinsic features of MCL, and possibly recent bendamustine exposure, may be associated with inferior efficacy outcomes.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be cured with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP); however, one-third of patients experience refractory or relapsed disease. Studies comparing R-CHOP with modified regimens replacing R with obinutuzumab (O) or adding lenalidomide (L) did not result in improved outcomes; however, L and O together may enhance natural killer-cell mediated antibody-dependent cellular toxicity when paired with CHOP. Here, we report on a phase 1b/2 study of 53 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL who received 6 cycles of LO-CHOP. The end of treatment overall and complete response rates of the 50 evaluable patients were 98% and 90%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 4.5 years, the 4-year progression free and overall survival rates were 87.4% and 91.3%, respectively. Grade 3 to 4 adverse events were experienced by 70% of patients, including neutropenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (17%), fatigue (13%), and neutropenic fever (13%). Of the 33 patients profiled with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing, 31 (94%) had detectable pretreatment ctDNA with cancer personalized profiling by deep sequencing, 24 (73%) were classifiable by the LymphGen classifier, and 15/20 (75%) and 12/17 (71%) patients achieved early and major molecular responses after 1 and 2 cycles, respectively. Using phased variant enrichment and detection sequencing, 16/18 evaluable patients (89%) showed no detectable ctDNA after at least 5 cycles of LO-CHOP. LO-CHOP demonstrates high efficacy and tolerability in newly diagnosed DLBCL, leading to a high rate of undetectable minimal residual disease by ctDNA. This trial has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02529852., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Increasing evidence suggests that the gut microbiome may modulate the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. In a B cell lymphoma patient cohort from five centers in Germany and the United States (Germany, n = 66; United States, n = 106; total, n = 172), we demonstrate that wide-spectrum antibiotics treatment ('high-risk antibiotics') prior to CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is associated with adverse outcomes, but this effect is likely to be confounded by an increased pretreatment tumor burden and systemic inflammation in patients pretreated with high-risk antibiotics. To resolve this confounding effect and gain insights into antibiotics-masked microbiome signals impacting CAR-T efficacy, we focused on the high-risk antibiotics non-exposed patient population. Indeed, in these patients, significant correlations were noted between pre-CAR-T infusion Bifidobacterium longum and microbiome-encoded peptidoglycan biosynthesis, and CAR-T treatment-associated 6-month survival or lymphoma progression. Furthermore, predictive pre-CAR-T treatment microbiome-based machine learning algorithms trained on the high-risk antibiotics non-exposed German cohort and validated by the respective US cohort robustly segregated long-term responders from non-responders. Bacteroides, Ruminococcus, Eubacterium and Akkermansia were most important in determining CAR-T responsiveness, with Akkermansia also being associated with pre-infusion peripheral T cell levels in these patients. Collectively, we identify conserved microbiome features across clinical and geographical variations, which may enable cross-cohort microbiome-based predictions of outcomes in CAR-T cell immunotherapy., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Peripheral mononuclear blood cells (PBMCs) are the most widely used study materials for immunomonitoring and antigen-specific T-cell identification. However, limited patient PBMCs and low-frequency antigen-specific T cells remain as significant technical challenges. To address these limitations, we established a novel platform comprised of optimized HLA-matched immortalized B cells transfected with mRNA of a prototype viral or tumor antigen conjugated to MHC class-I trafficking domain protein (MITD) to increase the efficiency of epitope expression in antigen-presenting cells (APCs) essential to expanding antigen-specific T cells. When applied to CMV as a model, the IBMAM platform could successfully expand CMV-specific T cells from low-frequency CMV PBMCs from seropositive donors. Additionally, this platform can be applied to the validation of antigen specific TCRs. Together, compared to using APCs with synthesized peptides, this platform is an unlimited, highly efficient, and cost-effective resource in detecting and expanding antigen-specific T cells and validating antigen-specific TCRs.

Background: In the ZUMA-5 trial (Clinical trials identification: NCT03105336), axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) demonstrated high rates of durable response in relapsed/refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) patients and clear superiority relative to the SCHOLAR-5 external control cohort. We update this comparison using the ZUMA-5 24-month data., Research Design and Methods: The SCHOLAR-5 cohort is comprised of r/r FL patients who initiated ≥3 rd line of therapy after July 2014 and meeting ZUMA-5 eligibility criteria. Groups were balanced for patient characteristics through propensity scoring on prespecified prognostic factors using standardized mortality ratio (SMR) weighting. The overall response rate was compared using a weighted logistic regression. Time-to-event outcomes were evaluated using a Cox regression., Results: For SCHOLAR-5, the sum of weights for the 143 patients was 85 after SMR weighting, versus 86 patients in ZUMA-5. The median follow-up was 29.4 months and 25.4 months for ZUMA-5 and SCHOLAR-5, respectively. The hazard ratios for overall survival and progression-free survival were 0.52 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28-0.95) and 0.28 (95% CI: 0.17-0.45), favoring axi-cel., Conclusion: This updated analysis, using a longer minimum follow-up than a previously published analysis, shows that the improved efficacy of axi-cel, relative to available therapies, in r/r FL is durable. .

Salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a potentially curative treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (rrLBCL) with chemosensitive disease. A 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) scan after salvage chemotherapy is used to assess response and eligibility for ASCT, but metrics for chemosensitivity in patients with residual disease are not well defined. We performed a single-centre retrospective analysis of 92 patients with a partial response or stable disease after salvage chemotherapy for rrLBCL who received ASCT to investigate PET-derived parameters and their prognostic utility. The Deauville 5-point Scale (D-5PS) score, maximum standardised uptake value (SUV max ), total metabolic tumour volume (TMTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated from the post-salvage/pre-ASCT PET scan. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 40% and 54% respectively. A D-5PS score of 5 (p = 0.0082, hazard ratio [HR] 2.09), high SUV max (p = 0.0015, HR 2.48), TMTV (p = 0.035, HR 1.83) and TLG (p = 0.0036, HR 2.27) were associated with inferior PFS. A D-5PS score of 5 (p = 0.030, HR 1.98) and high SUV max (p = 0.0025, HR 2.55) were associated with inferior OS. PET-derived parameters may help prognosticate outcomes after ASCT in patients with rrLBCL with residual disease after salvage chemotherapy., (© 2022 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for relapsed or refractory (r/r) large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) results in durable response in only a subset of patients. MYC overexpression in LBCL tumors is associated with poor response to treatment. We tested whether an MYC-driven polyamine signature, as a liquid biopsy, is predictive of response to anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy in patients with r/r LBCL. Elevated plasma acetylated polyamines were associated with non-durable response. Concordantly, increased expression of spermidine synthase, a key enzyme that regulates levels of acetylated spermidine, was prognostic for survival in r/r LBCL. A broad metabolite screen identified additional markers that resulted in a 6-marker panel (6MetP) consisting of acetylspermidine, diacetylspermidine, and lysophospholipids, which was validated in an independent set from another institution as predictive of non-durable response to CAR-T therapy. A polyamine centric metabolomics liquid biopsy panel has predictive value for response to CAR-T therapy in r/r LBCL., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests An Invention Disclosure Report related to findings reported herein has been submitted to the University of Texas. M.S. has received industry research support from Amgen, Gilead, Miltenyi Biotec, Morphosys, Roche, and Seattle Genetics and has served as a consultant/advisor to Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Gilead, Pfizer, Novartis, and Roche. She sits on the advisory boards of Amgen, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and Seattle Genetics and serves on the speakers' bureau at Amgen, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, and Pfizer. N.Y.S. has intellectual property rights in the field of cellular immunotherapy and microbiome. S.S.N. received personal fees from Kite, a Gilead Company, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Celgene, Pfizer, Allogene Therapeutics, Cell Medica/Kuur, Incyte, Precision Biosciences, Legend Biotech, Adicet Bio, Calibr, Bluebird Bio, and Unum Therapeutics; research support from Kite, a Gilead Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Poseida, Cellectis, Celgene, Karus Therapeutics, Unum Therapeutics, Allogene Therapeutics, Precision Biosciences, and Acerta; royalties from Takeda Pharmaceuticals; and has intellectual property rights related to cell therapy. M.G. reports research funding from Sanofi, Kite/Gilead, Abbvie, and Allogene, honoraria from Tessa Therapeutics and Daiichi Sankyo, and stock ownership of KDAc Therapeutics. P.S. received research support from Astrazeneca-Acerta and from ALX Oncology and is a consultant for Roche-Genentech and Hutchinson MediPharma. S.S.N. has received personal fees from Kite, a Gilead Company, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Celgene, Pfizer, Allogene Therapeutics, Cell Medica/Kuur, Incyte, Precision Biosciences, Legend Biotech, Adicet Bio, Calibr, Unum Therapeutics, and Bluebird Bio; research support from Kite, a Gilead Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Poseida, Cellectis, Celgene, Karus Therapeutics, Unum Therapeutics, Allogene Therapeutics, Precision Biosciences, and Acerta; and patents, royalties, or other intellectual property from Takeda Pharmaceuticals., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Conditioning chemotherapy (CCT) has been shown to be essential for optimal efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Here, we determined whether the change in absolute lymphocyte count, referred to as delta lymphocyte index (DLIx), may serve as a surrogate marker for pharmacodynamic effects of CCT and whether it associated with germline genetic variants in patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). One-hundred and seventy-one patients were included, of which 86 (50%) received bridging therapy post-leukapheresis. Median DLIx was 0.5 × 10 9 /L (range, 0.01-2.75 × 10 9 /L) and was significantly higher in patients who achieved complete response (p = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, low DLIx was associated only with use of bridging therapy (odds ratio 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8, p = 0.007). Low DLIx was independently associated with shorter progression-free (p = 0.02) and overall survival (p = 0.02). DLIx was associated with genetic variations related to drug metabolism and macrophage biology such as ABCB1, MISP and CPVL. The impact of CCT on lymphocyte count is affected by use of bridging therapy but change in lymphocyte count is independently associated with efficacy. Studies aimed at investigating macrophage biology in this setting may suggest strategies to increase the efficacy of CCT and improve outcomes., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Tisagenlecleucel is associated with remarkable outcomes in treating patients up to the age of 25 years with refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Yet, due to unique and potentially life-threatening complications, access remains limited to higher-resource and certified centers. Reports of inequity and related disparities in care are emerging. In this multicenter study of ALL patients admitted for anti-leukemia therapy, who required pediatric intensive care (ICU) support (n = 205), patients receiving tisagenlecleucel (n = 39) were compared to those receiving conventional chemotherapy (n = 166). The median time to ICU transfer was 6 (0-43) versus 1 (0-116) days, respectively (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in the use of vasopressor, ionotropic, sedating, and/or paralytic agents between groups, but use of dexamethasone was higher among tisagenlecleucel patients. Patients receiving tisagenlecleucel were more likely to have cardiorespiratory toxicity (p = 0.0002), but there were no differences in diagnostic interventions between both groups and/or differences in ICU length of stay and/or overall hospital survival. Toxicities associated with tisagenlecleucel are generally reversible, and our findings suggest that resource utilization once admitted to the ICU may be similar among patients with ALL receiving tisagenlecleucel versus conventional chemotherapy. As centers consider improved access to care and the feasibility of tisagenlecleucel certification, our study may inform strategic planning., Competing Interests: KM is the site PI for Atara Biotherapeutics, Jazz Pharma, Allovir, and BMS. CG has served in the Advisory Board for Legend Biotech & Janssen. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling editor declared a past collaboration with author KM., (Copyright © 2022 Ragoonanan, Bhar, Mohan, Beltramo, Khazal, Hurley, Andersen, Margossian, Neelapu, Shpall, Gutierrez, Tewari, Shoberu, Talleur, McCall, Nunez, Cuglievan, Tambaro, Petropoulos, Abdel-Azim and Mahadeo.)

Background: The majority of patients with large B-cell lymphoma treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, develop cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Whether the lack of development of CRS with axi-cel is associated with inferior lymphoma outcomes is unknown. Additionally, relationship between CRS grade and lymphoma outcome is not well established., Methods: The US Lymphoma CAR T Consortium includes seventeen US academic centers that contribute data independently of manufacturers. We analyzed the modified intent-to-treat population of 275 patients receiving axi-cel in two different ways: 1) Two group analysis comparing no CRS with any grade CRS; 2) Three group analysis comparing grade 0 CRS with grade 1 to 2 CRS, and grade 3-5 CRS., Results: In this large multi-center observational cohort of 275 patients receiving axi-cel, 9% (n = 24) did not develop CRS, 84% (n = 232) developed grade 1-2 CRS, and 7% (n = 19) developed grade 3 to 5 CRS. Patients without CRS, compared with those having any grade CRS, had similar overall response rates (ORR), lower complete response (CR) rates and inferior progression free survival (PFS) with no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS). Patients experiencing grade 1 to 2 CRS had superior CR rate and PFS, as compared to those without CRS or with grade 3 to 5 CRS. Grade 3 to 5 CRS was associated with a worse OS., Conclusion: Overall, durable responses were seen in patients that did not develop CRS, however grade 1 to 2 CRS was associated with better outcomes while those with grade 3 to 5 experienced the worse outcomes., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a hematologic malignancy associated with overexpression of CD123. Allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) directed against CD123 in BPDCN have been studied in clinical trials. We performed post-mortem analysis of a patient treated with anti-CD123 CAR-T to elucidate cause of death, development of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and tissue distribution of UCART123 cells., Methods: A post-mortem multidisciplinary clinicopathologic analysis was performed with digital droplet polymerase chain reaction of isolated blood and tissue ribonucleic acid (RNA) to evaluate tissue distribution of infused CAR-T. Multiparameter flow cytometry for detection of CAR-T was used for whole blood samples. Cytokine levels in plasma were measured using multiplex bead assay. Gene expression profiling on isolated RNA was performed using semi-custom Nanostring immune gene panel and RNA-sequence method. RNA in situ hybridization was performed using CAR-specific probe., Results: The patient developed severe clinical CRS refractory to corticosteroids, tocilizumab, and lymphodepletion. Despite significant reduction in BPDCN lesions, the patient passed away on day 9 of CAR-T. Autopsy results show that following lymphodepletion and UCART123 administration, the patient remained severely lymphopenic with few UCART123 cells detected, predominantly localized to spleen., Conclusions: No definitive cause of death was determined, but we hypothesized that the patient may have succumbed to CAR-T-mediated cardiopulmonary toxicity. UCART123 cells displayed low overall distribution, with predominance in immune organs and tissues. Mechanism of CRS development is still poorly understood in patients receiving CAR-T therapy. Future directions in the field developing CD123-targeted agents in BPDCN are discussed., Competing Interests: Disclosure of Conflict of Interest M Konopleva: Consulting/honorarium: AbbVie, Genentech, F. Hoffman La-Roche, Stemline Therapeutics, Amgen, Forty-Seven, and Kisoji. Research funding/clinical trials support: AbbVie, Genentech, F. Hoffman La-Roche, Eli Lilly, Cellectis, Calithera, Ablynx, Stemline Therapeutics, Agios, Ascentage, and Astra Zeneca. Stock options/Royalties: Reata Pharmaceutical. N Pemmaraju: Consulting/honorarium: Celgene, Stemline, Incyte Corporation, Novartis, MustangBio, Roche Diagnostics, and LFB. Research funding/clinical trials support from Stemline, Novartis, Abbvie, Samus, Cellectis, Plexxikon, Daiichi-Sankyo, Affymetrix, and SagerStrong Foundation. M Guzman: Consulting/honorarium: SeqRx. Research funding: AI Therapeutics, TemedOn, Cellectis. S Neelapu: Consulting fees or honorarium from Kite, a Gilead Company, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Celgene, Pfizer, Allogene Therapeutics, Athenex, Incyte, Precision Biosciences, Legend Biotech, Adicet Bio, Calibr, Unum Therapeutics, Bluebird Bio, Sana Biotechnology, Caribou, Astellas Pharma, Sellas Life Sciences; research funding from Kite, a Gilead Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Poseida, Cellectis, Celgene, Karus Therapeutics, Unum Therapeutics (Cogent Biosciences), Allogene, Precision BioSciences, Acerta and Adicet Bio; royalty income from Takeda Pharmaceuticals; stock options from Longbow Immunotherapy; and patents related to cell therapy. MG Frattini: Employment and Equity ownership: Cellectis, Inc. A Garton: Employment and Equity ownership: Cellectis, Inc. J. Smith: Employment and Equity ownership: Cellectis, S.A., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)