Search

Background: This study aimed to investigate the possible relationship between different stent sizes and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes treated with drug-eluting stents (DESs) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Methods: Patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing elective PCI with the DES were entered into a retrospective cohort between 2003 and 2019. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the combined endpoint of revascularization, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death, were recorded. The participants were categorized according to the stent size: 27 mm for length and 3 mm for diameter. DAPT (aspirin and clopidogrel) was used for at least 2 years for diabetics and 1 year for nondiabetics. The median duration of follow-up was 74.7 months. Results: Out of 1630 participants, 29.0% had diabetes. The diabetics constituted 37.8% of those with MACE. The mean diameter of the stents in the diabetics and nondiabetics was 2.81±0.29 mm and 2.90±0.35 mm, respectively (P>0.05). The mean stent length was 19.48±7.58 mm and 18.92±6.64 mm in the diabetics and nondiabetics, respectively (P>0.05). After adjustments for confounding variables, MACE was not significantly different between the patients with and without diabetes. Although MACE incidence was not affected by stent dimensions in the patients with diabetes, the nondiabetic patients implanted with a stent length exceeding 27 mm experienced MACE less frequently. Conclusion: Diabetes did not influence MACE in our population. Additionally, stents of different sizes were not associated with MACE in patients with diabetes. We propose that using the DES supplemented by long-term DAPT and tight control of glycemic status after PCI could decrease the adverse consequences of diabetes.

Context Vitamin D regulates glucose homeostasis pathways, but effects of vitamin D supplementation on β-cell function remain unclear. Objective To investigate the effects of vitamin D3 supplementation on insulin sensitivity and β-cell function. Methods This is a prespecified secondary analysis of the Vitamin D and Type 2 Diabetes study. Overweight/obese adults at high risk for type 2 diabetes (prediabetes) were randomly treated with vitamin D3 4000 IU or matching placebo daily for 24 months. Main Outcome Disposition index (DI), as an estimate of β-cell function, was calculated as the product of Homeostasis Model Assessment 2 indices derived from C-peptide values (HOMA2%Scpep) and C-peptide response during the first 30 minutes of a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Results Mean age was 60.5 ± 9.8 years and body mass index was 31.9 ± 4.4 kg/m2. Mean serum 25(OH)D level increased from 27.9 ± 10.3 ng/mL at baseline to 54.9 ng/mL at 2 years in the vitamin D group and was unchanged (28.5 ± 10.0 ng/mL) in the placebo group. The baseline DI predicted incident diabetes independent of the intervention. In the entire cohort, there were no significant differences in changes in DI, HOMA2%Scpep, or C-peptide response between the 2 groups. Among participants with baseline 25(OH)D level Conclusions Supplementation with vitamin D3 for 24 months did not improve an OGTT-derived index of β-cell function in people with prediabetes not selected based on baseline vitamin D status; however, there was benefit among those with very low baseline vitamin D status.

The comparative effectiveness of glucose-lowering medications for use with metformin to maintain target glycated hemoglobin levels in persons with type 2 diabetes is uncertain.In this trial involving participants with type 2 diabetes of less than 10 years' duration who were receiving metformin and had glycated hemoglobin levels of 6.8 to 8.5%, we compared the effectiveness of four commonly used glucose-lowering medications. We randomly assigned participants to receive insulin glargine U-100 (hereafter, glargine), the sulfonylurea glimepiride, the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide, or sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor. The primary metabolic outcome was a glycated hemoglobin level, measured quarterly, of 7.0% or higher that was subsequently confirmed, and the secondary metabolic outcome was a confirmed glycated hemoglobin level greater than 7.5%.A total of 5047 participants (19.8% Black and 18.6% Hispanic or Latinx) who had received metformin for type 2 diabetes were followed for a mean of 5.0 years. The cumulative incidence of a glycated hemoglobin level of 7.0% or higher (the primary metabolic outcome) differed significantly among the four groups (P0.001 for a global test of differences across groups); the rates with glargine (26.5 per 100 participant-years) and liraglutide (26.1) were similar and lower than those with glimepiride (30.4) and sitagliptin (38.1). The differences among the groups with respect to a glycated hemoglobin level greater than 7.5% (the secondary outcome) paralleled those of the primary outcome. There were no material differences with respect to the primary outcome across prespecified subgroups defined according to sex, age, or race or ethnic group; however, among participants with higher baseline glycated hemoglobin levels there appeared to be an even greater benefit with glargine, liraglutide, and glimepiride than with sitagliptin. Severe hypoglycemia was rare but significantly more frequent with glimepiride (in 2.2% of the participants) than with glargine (1.3%), liraglutide (1.0%), or sitagliptin (0.7%). Participants who received liraglutide reported more frequent gastrointestinal side effects and lost more weight than those in the other treatment groups.All four medications, when added to metformin, decreased glycated hemoglobin levels. However, glargine and liraglutide were significantly, albeit modestly, more effective in achieving and maintaining target glycated hemoglobin levels. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; GRADE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01794143.).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentration has been associated with higher levels of proteinuria and lower levels of eGFR in observational studies. In the Vitamin D and Type 2 Diabetes (D2d) study, we investigated the effect of vitamin D supplementation on kidney outcomes in a population with prediabetes. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Overweight/obese adults with high risk for type 2 diabetes (defined by meeting two of three glycemic criteria for prediabetes) were randomized to vitamin D(3) 4000 IU per day versus placebo. Median duration of treatment was 2.9 years (interquartile range 2.0–3.5 years). Kidney outcomes included (1) worsening in Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO ) risk score (low, moderate, high, very high) on two consecutive follow-up visits after the baseline visit and (2) mean changes in eGFR and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). RESULTS: Among 2166 participants (mean age 60 years, body mass index 32 kg/m(2), serum 25(OH)D 28 ng/ml, eGFR 87 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), UACR 11 mg/g, 79% with hypertension), 10% had moderate, high, or very high KDIGO risk score. Over a median follow-up of 2.9 years, there were 28 cases of KDIGO worsening in the vitamin D group and 30 in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.52 to 1.52]). Mean difference in eGFR from baseline was −1.0 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (95% CI, −1.3 to −0.7) in the vitamin D group and −0.1 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (95% CI, −0.4 to 0.2) in the placebo group; between-group difference was −1.0 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (95% CI, −1.4 to −0.6). Mean difference in UACR was 2.7 mg/g (95% CI, 1.2 to 4.3) in the vitamin D group and 2.0 (95% CI, 0.5 to 3.6) in the placebo group; between-group difference was 0.7 mg/g (95% CI, −1.5 to 2.9). CONCLUSIONS: Among persons with prediabetes, who were not preselected on the basis of serum 25(OH)D concentration, vitamin D supplementation did not affect progression of KDIGO risk scores and did not have a meaningful effect on change in UACR or eGFR.

Five Phase 3 SURPASS trials have shown robust efficacy of novel dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, tirzepatide, in glycaemic control and body weight (BW) loss in adults with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) . A key secondary endpoint investigated the effect of tirzepatide (5, 10, and 15 mg) versus placebo or active comparators on mean BW change from baseline to endpoint. To determine whether weight-lowering effects of tirzepatide depend on the sex of study participants, we conducted a post-hoc subgroup analysis of SURPASS (S) -1 to -5 trials. BW change in the sex subgroups was assessed in patients while on treatment without rescue medication (efficacy estimand) in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, defined as all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. All tirzepatide doses significantly reduced BW compared to placebo or active comparators regardless of the sex of study participants (S-1 to -5 p Disclosure A.W.Plat: None. N.Rasouli: Advisory Panel; Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Research Support; Allergan, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk. J.Peleshok: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly and Company. H.Sapin: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. J.Wilding: Advisory Panel; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Mundipharma, Novo Nordisk A/S, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi, Research Support; AstraZeneca, Speaker's Bureau; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lilly Diabetes, Novo Nordisk A/S, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Funding Eli Lilly and Company

Traditionally, the prevention and management of chronic complications in individuals with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been focused on of nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (including ischemic heart disease, stroke or peripheral vascular disease) (1). However, heart failure (HF) has been recognized as a common complication of diabetes, with a prevalence of up to 22% in individuals with diabetes and increasing incidence rates (2–4). This recognition stems in part from trials focused on cardiovascular safety of newer drugs to treat diabetes. Data also suggest HF may develop in individuals with diabetes even in the absence of hypertension, coronary heart disease, or valvular heart disease and, as such, represents a major cardiovascular complication in this vulnerable population (5). Given that during the past decade, the prevalence of diabetes (particularly T2D) has risen by 30% globally (6) (with prevalence expected to increase further), the burden of HF on the health care system will continue to rise. The scope of this American Diabetes Association (ADA) consensus report with designated representation from the American College of Cardiology (ACC) is to provide clear guidance and to recommend best approaches to general internists, family physicians, and endocrinologists for HF screening, diagnosis, and management in individuals with T1D, T2D, or prediabetes to mitigate the risks of serious complications, leveraging prior policy statements by the ACC (7) and American Heart Association (AHA) (2). This consensus report was developed by the writing group convened by ADA with representation from ACC through a series of conference calls, emails, and independent work from March 2021 through March 2022. Traditionally, the prevention and management of chronic complications in individuals with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been focused on of nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (including ischemic heart disease, stroke or peripheral vascular disease) (1). However, heart failure (HF) has been recognized as a common complication of diabetes, with a prevalence of up to 22% in individuals with diabetes and increasing incidence rates (2–4). This recognition stems in part from trials focused on cardiovascular safety of newer drugs to treat diabetes. Data also suggest HF may develop in individuals with diabetes even in the absence of hypertension, coronary heart disease, or valvular heart disease and, as such, represents a major cardiovascular complication in this vulnerable population (5). Given that during the past decade, the prevalence of diabetes (particularly T2D) has risen by 30% globally (6) (with prevalence expected to increase further), the burden of HF on the health care system will continue to rise. The scope of this American Diabetes Association (ADA) consensus report with designated representation from the American College of Cardiology (ACC) is to provide clear guidance and to recommend best approaches to general internists, family physicians, and endocrinologists for HF screening, diagnosis, and management in individuals with T1D, T2D, or prediabetes to mitigate the risks of serious complications, leveraging prior policy statements by the ACC (7) and American Heart Association (AHA) (2). This consensus report was developed by the writing group convened by ADA with representation from ACC through a series of conference calls, emails, and independent work from March 2021 through March 2022.

Context Observational studies suggest that low vitamin D status may be a risk factor for cancer. Objective In a population with prediabetes and overweight/obesity that is at higher risk of cancer than the general population, we sought to determine if vitamin D supplementation lowers the risk of cancer and precancers. Methods The Vitamin D and type 2 diabetes (D2d) cancer outcomes study (D2dCA) is an ancillary study to the D2d study, which was conducted at 22 academic medical centers in the United States. Participants had prediabetes and overweight/obesity and were free of cancer for the previous 5 years. Participants were randomized to receive vitamin D3 4000 IU daily or placebo. At scheduled study visits (4 times/year), cancer and precancer events were identified by questionnaires. Clinical data were collected and adjudicated for all reported events. Cox proportional hazard models compared the hazard ratio (HR) of incident cancers and precancers between groups. Results Over a median follow-up period of 2.9 years, among 2385 participants (mean age 60 years and 25-hydroxyvitamin D 28 ng/mL), there were 89 cases of cancer. The HR of incident cancer for vitamin D vs placebo was 1.07 (95% CI 0.70, 1.62). Of 241 participants with incident precancers, 239 had colorectal adenomatous polyps. The HR for colorectal polyps for vitamin D vs placebo was 0.83 (95% CI 0.64, 1.07). Conclusion In the D2d population of participants with prediabetes and overweight/obesity, not selected for vitamin D insufficiency, vitamin D supplementation did not have a significant effect on risk of incident cancer or colorectal polyps.

Low blood 25(OH)D level is associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Additionally, individuals with prediabetes are at higher risk for CVD than individuals with normoglycemia. We investigated the effects of vitamin D supplementation on CVD outcomes in the vitamin D and type 2 diabetes (D2d) study, a large trial among adults with prediabetes.2423 participants were randomized to 4000 IU/day of vitamin DMean age was 60 years, 45 % were women, 13 % had history of CVD. Twenty-one participants assigned to vitamin D and 12 participants assigned to placebo met the MACE outcome (HR 1.81, 95%CI 0.89 to 3.69). There were 27 expanded MACE outcomes in each group (HR 1.02, 95%CI, 0.59 to 1.76). There were no significant differences between vitamin D and placebo in individual CVD risk factors, but change in ASCVD risk score favored the vitamin D group (-0.45 %, 95%CI -0.75 to -0.15).In people with prediabetes not selected for vitamin D insufficiency and with intermediate CVD risk, vitamin D supplementation did not decrease MACE but had a small favorable effect on ASCVD risk score.D2d ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01942694, prospectively registered September 16, 2013.

OBJECTIVE We evaluated the effect of optimizing metformin dosing on glycemia and body weight in type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a prespecified analysis of 6,823 participants in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE) taking metformin as the sole glucose-lowering drug who completed a 4- to 14-week (mean ± SD 7.9 ± 2.4) run-in in which metformin was adjusted to 2,000 mg/day or a maximally tolerated lower dose. Participants had type 2 diabetes for RESULTS Adjusted for duration of run-in, the mean ± SD change in HbA1c was −0.65 ± 0.02% (−7.1 ± 0.2 mmol/mol) when the dose was increased by ≥1,000 mg/day, −0.48 ± 0.02% (−5.2 ± 0.2 mmol/mol) when the dose was unchanged, and −0.23 ± 0.07% (−2.5 ± 0.8 mmol/mol) when the dose was decreased (n = 2,169, 3,548, and 192, respectively). Higher HbA1c at entry predicted greater reduction in HbA1c (P < 0.001) in univariate and multivariate analyses. Weight loss adjusted for duration of run-in averaged 0.91 ± 0.05 kg in participants who increased metformin by ≥1,000 mg/day (n = 1,894). CONCLUSIONS Optimizing metformin to 2,000 mg/day or a maximally tolerated lower dose combined with emphasis on medication adherence and lifestyle can improve glycemia in type 2 diabetes and HbA1c values ≥6.8% (51 mmol/mol). These findings may help guide efforts to optimize metformin therapy among persons with type 2 diabetes and suboptimal glycemic control.

Objective Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-hour plasma glucose (2hPG) from a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) can lead to different results when diagnosing prediabetes and diabetes. The Hemoglobin Glycation Index (HGI) quantifies the interindividual variation in glycation resulting in discrepancies between FPG and HbA1c. We used data from the Vitamin D and Type 2 Diabetes (D2d) study to calculate HGI, to identify HGI-associated variables, and to determine how HGI affects prediabetes and diabetes diagnosis. Measurements A linear regression equation [HbA1c (%) = 0.0164 × FPG (mg/dL) + 4.2] was derived using the screening cohort (n = 6829) and applied to calculate predicted HbA1c. This was subtracted from the observed HbA1c to determine HGI in the baseline cohort with 2hPG data (n = 3945). Baseline variables plus prediabetes and diabetes diagnosis by FPG, HbA1c, and 2hPG were compared among low, moderate, and high HGI subgroups. Results The proportion of women and Black/African American individuals increased from low to high HGI subgroups. Mean FPG decreased and mean HbA1c increased from low to high HGI subgroups, consistent with the HGI calculation; however, mean 2hPG was not significantly different among HGI subgroups. Conclusions High HGI was associated with Black race and female sex as reported previously. The observation that 2hPG was not different across HGI subgroups suggests that variation in postprandial glucose is not a significant source of population variation in HGI. Exclusive use of HbA1c for diagnosis will classify more Black individuals and women as having prediabetes compared with using FPG or 2hPG.

Islet autoimmunity may contribute to β-cell dysfunction in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Its prevalence and clinical significance have not been rigorously determined. In this ancillary study to the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes-A Comparative Effectiveness (GRADE) Study, we investigated the prevalence of cellular and humoral islet autoimmunity in patients with T2D duration 4·0±3·0 y, HbA1c 7·5±0·5% on metformin alone. We measured T cell autoreactivity against islet proteins, islet autoantibodies against GAD65, IA2, ZnT8, and β-cell function. Cellular islet autoimmunity was present in 41·3%, humoral islet autoimmunity in 13·5%, and both in 5·3%. β-cell function calculated as iAUC-CG and ∆C-peptide(0– 30)/∆glucose(0–30) from an oral glucose tolerance test was lower among T cell-positives (T+) than T cell-negatives (T-) using two different adjustments for insulin sensitivity (iAUC-CG: 13·2% [95% CI 0·3, 24·4%] or 11·4% [95% CI 0·4, 21·2%] lower; ∆C-peptide(0–30)/∆glucose(0–30)) 19% [95% CI 3·1, 32·3%] or 17·7% [95% CI 2·6, 30·5%] lower). T+ patients had 17% higher HbA1c (95% CI 0·07, 0·28) and 7·7 mg/dL higher fasting plasma glucose levels (95% CI 0·2,15·3) than T- patients. We conclude that islet autoimmunity is much more prevalent in T2D patients than previously reported. T cell-mediated autoimmunity is associated with diminished β-cell function and worse glycemic control.

Vitamin D is believed to regulate pathways in glucose homeostasis, but effects of vitamin D supplementation on insulin sensitivity and β-cell function in humans remain uncertain. We completed a secondary analysis of the Vitamin D and type 2 diabetes (D2d) study to investigate the effects of vitamin D supplementation on insulin sensitivity and β-cell function. Participants at high risk for type 2 diabetes, meeting at least 2-out-of-3 ADA criteria for prediabetes, were randomly assigned to 4000 IU/day of vitamin D3 or placebo. Insulin sensitivity and β-cell function were estimated using data from 75-gram oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT). We used the University of Oxford HOMA2 Calculator to estimate insulin sensitivity from simultaneously measured fasting plasma glucose and C-peptide values. Early C-peptide and insulin responses were calculated as the ratio of C-peptide or insulin increment to glucose level changes during the first 30 minutes of the OGTT. The disposition index (DI) as an estimate of β-cell function was calculated as the product of C-peptide response and HOMA2%S. The response to vitamin D3 was evaluated in 1,774 participants over 24 months. Baseline characteristics [mean age 60.5±9.8 years, BMI 31.9±4.4 kg/m2, 56.4% male, 69.1% white, 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH D) 28.2±10.2 ng/ml, HbA1c 5.9%±0.2, FPG 107.7±7.2 mg/dl, 2hrOGTT glucose 137.1±34.1 mg/dl] were similar between the vitamin D and placebo groups. Serum 25-OH D increased from 27.9±10.3 ng/ml to 54.9±14.4 ng/ml at 24 months in the vitamin D group and remained unchanged with placebo (p In conclusion, in this pre-specified analysis from the D2d study, supplementation with vitamin D for 24 months did not alter insulin sensitivity or β-cell function in people with prediabetes who were not selected based on their baseline vitamin D levels. Disclosure N. Rasouli: Consultant; Self; Novo Nordisk, Research Support; Self; Allergan plc, Lilly Diabetes, Novo Nordisk. I. Brodsky: None. R. Chatterjee: Research Support; Self; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Epigenomics AG, Verily Life Sciences. S. H. Kim: Advisory Panel; Self; Bayer U. S., GI Dynamics, Stock/Shareholder; Spouse/Partner; Dexcom, Inc. R. E. Pratley: Other Relationship; Self; Hanmi Pharmaceutical, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Metavention, Monster Energy Company, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Pfizer Inc., Poxel SA, Sanofi, Scohia Pharma Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. M. Staten: None. J. P. Nelson: None. A. G. Pittas: None. D2d research group: n/a. Funding American Diabetes Association (1-14-D2d-01 to A.G.P.); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U34DK091958); Office of Dietary Supplements (U01DK098245)

AIMS The use of incretin-based therapy, rather than or complementary to, insulin therapy is an active area of research in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We determined the glycaemic efficacy and safety of linagliptin compared to a basal-bolus insulin regimen in hospitalized surgical patients with T2D. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective open-label multicentre study randomized T2D patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery with admission blood glucose (BG) of 7.8 to 22.2 mmol/L who were under treatment with diet, oral agents or total insulin dose (TDD) ≤ 0.5 units/kg/day to either linagliptin (n = 128) daily or basal-bolus (n = 122) with glargine once daily and rapid-acting insulin before meals. Both groups received supplemental insulin for BG > 7.8 mmol/L. The primary endpoint was difference in mean daily BG between groups. RESULTS Mean daily BG was higher in the linagliptin group compared to the basal-bolus group (9.5 ± 2.6 vs 8.8 ± 2.3 mmol/L/dL, P = 0.03) with a mean daily BG difference of 0.6 mmol/L (95% confidence interval 0.04, 1.2). In patients with randomization BG < 11.1 mmol/L (63% of cohort), mean daily BG was similar in the linagliptin and basal-bolus groups (8.9 ± 2.3 vs 8.7 ± 2.3 mmol/L, P = 0.43); however, patients with BG ≥ 11.1 mmol/L who were treated with linagliptin had higher BG compared to the basal-bolus group (10.9 ± 2.6 vs 9.2 ± 2.2 mmol/L, P < 0.001). Linagliptin resulted in fewer hypoglycaemic events (1.6% vs 11%, P = 0.001; 86% relative risk reduction), with similar supplemental insulin and fewer daily insulin injections (2.0 ± 3.3 vs 3.1 ± 3.3, P < 0.001) compared to the basal-bolus group. CONCLUSIONS For patients with T2D undergoing non-cardiac surgery who presented with mild to moderate hyperglycaemia (BG < 11.1 mmol/L), daily linagliptin is a safe and effective alternative to multi-dose insulin therapy, resulting in similar glucose control with lower hypoglycaemia.

Aims Type 2 diabetes and obesity are associated with chronic hypoxia, which contributes to adipose tissue dysfunction and development of insulin resistance and metabolic disorders. We assessed long-term effects of hyperoxia on browning of adipocytes and carbohydrate metabolism in a murine model of type 2 diabetes. Main methods Male Wistar rats (190–210 g) were divided into 4 groups: Control, O2-treated control, untreated diabetes, and O2-treated diabetes. Diabetes was induced using high-fat diet followed by a low-dose of streptozotocin (30 mg/kg). Hyperoxia sessions were included 2-h exposure to 95% oxygen, repeated 6 days/week for 5 weeks. Serum fasting glucose, insulin, lactate, and lipid profile were measured before, during, and after hyperoxia. Glucose and pyruvate tolerance tests, and histological evaluations of interscapular and epididymal fats were done at the end of study. Key findings O2-treated diabetic rats compared to untreated ones, displayed lower weight gain, improved glucose-tolerance, insulin sensitivity, and more favorable lipid profile. In diabetic rats, hyperoxia increased surface area (6.36 ± 0.93 vs. 0.86 ± 0.16 mm2, P Significance This study showed that beneficial metabolic effects of hyperoxia in obese type 2 diabetic rats including improved insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance are at least in part due to browning of adipose tissue.

Background: Islet autoimmunity may contribute to beta-cell dysfunction in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Its prevalence and clinical significance have not been rigorously determined. We investigated the prevalence of cellular and humoral islet autoimmunity in T2D and their relation to beta-cell function. Methods: The study was nested in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes – A Comparative Effectiveness (GRADE) study. Participants included 419 T2D patients (age 57·4±10·3 y [mean±SD], body mass index 33·6±6·2 kg/m2, diabetes duration 4·0±3·0 y, HbA1c 7·5±0·5%). We measured humoral (autoantibodies against GAD65, IA2, ZnT8) and cellular (T-cell autoreactivity against islet antigens) autoimmunity, beta-cell function (ratio of incremental area under the curve of C-peptide to that of glucose from 0–120 min of an oral glucose tolerance test [iAUC-CG]), and ratio of C-peptide to glucose from 0–30 min (∆C-peptide(0–30)/∆glucose(0–30)), and glycemic parameters. Findings: Cellular islet autoimmunity was present in 41·3%, humoral islet autoimmunity in 13·5%, and both in 5·3%. iAUC-CG and ∆C-peptide(0–30)/∆glucose(0–30) were lower among T-cell-positives than -negatives using two different adjustments for insulin sensitivity (iAUC-CG: 13·2% [95% CI 0·3, 24·4%] or 11·4% [95% CI 0·4, 21·2%] lower; ∆C-peptide(0–30)/∆glucose(0–30)) 19% [95% CI 3·1, 32·3%] or 17·7% [95% CI 2·6, 30·5%] lower). T-cell-positives had 0·17% higher HbA1c (95% CI 0·07,0·28) and 7·7 mg/dL higher fasting plasma glucose levels (95% CI 0·2,15·3) than T-cell-negatives. Interpretation: Islet autoimmunity is highly prevalent in patients with T2D. T-cell-mediated autoimmunity is associated with diminished beta-cell function and worse glycemic control. Funding Information: This study was funded by the NIH. This ancillary study to the GRADE study was independently funded by grant R01DK104832 (to AB and JPP) from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. The GRADE study is supported by a grant from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number U01DK098246. The planning of GRADE was supported by a U34 planning grant from the NIDDK (U34-DK-088043). The American Diabetes Association supported the initial planning meeting for the U34 proposal. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also provided funding support. The Department of Veterans Affairs provided resources and facilities. Additional support was provided by grant numbers P30 DK017047, P30 DK020541-44, P30 DK020572, P30 DK072476, P30 DK079626, P30 DK092926, U54 GM104940, UL1 TR000439, UL1 TR000445, UL1 TR001108, UL1 TR001409, UL1 TR001449, UL1 TR002243, UL1 TR002345, UL1 TR002378, UL1 TR002489, UL1 TR002489, UL1 TR002529, UL1 TR002535, UL1 TR002537, and UL1 TR002548. Educational materials have been provided by the National Diabetes Education Program. Material support in the form of donated medications and supplies has been provided by Becton, Dickinson an Company, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, NovoNordisk, Roche Diagnostics, and Sanofi. Declaration of Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Ethics Approval Statement: Nineteen centers obtained local Institutional Review Board approval for the ancillary study and contributed participants.

Evaluate the relationship between measures of glycemia with β-cell function and insulin sensitivity in adults with early type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).This cross-sectional analysis evaluated baseline data from 3108 adults with T2DM10 years treated with metformin alone enrolled in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes. A Comparative Effectiveness (GRADE) Study. Insulin and C-peptide responses and insulin sensitivity were calculated from 2-h oral glucose tolerance tests. Regression models evaluated the relationships between glycemic measures (HbA1c, fasting and 2-h glucose), measures of β-cell function and insulin sensitivity.Insulin and C-peptide responses were inversely associated with insulin sensitivity. Glycemic measures were inversely associated with insulin and C-peptide responses adjusted for insulin sensitivity. HbA1c demonstrated modest associations with β-cell function (range: r - 0.22 to -0.35). Fasting and 2-h glucose were associated with early insulin and C-peptide responses (range: r - 0.37 to -0.40) as well as late insulin and total insulin and C-peptide responses (range: r - 0.50 to -0.60).Glycemia is strongly associated with β-cell dysfunction in adults with early T2DM treated with metformin alone. Efforts to improve glycemia should focus on interventions aimed at improving β-cell function. This Trial is registered in Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01794143.

Introduction: Low blood 25(OH)D levels are associated with increased cardiovascular (CVD) risk; however; it is unknown whether vitamin D supplementation reduces CVD risk or CVD events. In a secondary analysis from the D2d study, a large diabetes prevention trial, we investigated effects of vitamin D on CVD outcomes. Methods: Persons with prediabetes (n=2,423) not selected for vitamin D insufficiency were randomized to 4000 IU/day of vitamin D 3 or placebo and followed for a median duration of 2.5 years. The primary outcome for this analysis was first occurrence during the study of a composite 4-point Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE). Secondary aims evaluated effects on expanded MACE (MACE + revascularization) and on CVD risk variables (BP, lipids, CRP and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease score). All CVD events were independently adjudicated. In ITT analyses, Cox proportional models compared hazard rates between the two groups on 4-point and expanded MACE. Results: Baseline characteristics included 49% women, mean age was 60 years old, and 13% had established CVD by history. There were no significant differences in key baseline characteristics between the two groups. By month 24, the mean serum 25(OHD) D level in the vitamin D group was 54.3 ng per milliliter (from 27.7 ng per milliliter at baseline), as compared with 28.8 ng per milliliter in the placebo group (from 28.2 ng per milliliter at baseline). A primary MACE event occurred in 21 versus 12 subjects in the vitamin D versus placebo group (Hazard ratio 1.81, 95%CI 0.89-3.69). The number of expanded MACE events were the same between the two groups (n=27 in each group, hazard ratio 1.02, 95%CI, 0.59-1.76). CVD risk variables did not change significantly with vitamin D versus placebo. Conclusion: In a pre-diabetes population not selected for vitamin D insufficiency, vitamin D supplementation did not lower CVD risk.

To examine diabetes remission following a short-term intensive metabolic intervention combining lifestyle and glucose-lowering approaches.We conducted an open-label, randomized controlled trial in 154 patients with type 2 diabetes up to 8 years in duration on 0 to 2 glucose-lowering medications. Participants were randomized to (a) a 12-week intensive intervention comprising lifestyle approaches and treatment with insulin glargine, metformin, and dapagliflozin or (b) standard diabetes care. At 12 weeks, diabetes medications were discontinued in participants with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) 7.3% (56 mmol/mol). Participants were then followed for diabetes relapse until 64 weeks. The primary outcome was complete or partial diabetes remission (HbA1C 6.5% [48 mmol/mol] off chronic diabetes drugs) at 24 weeks. Main secondary outcomes were complete or partial diabetes remission at 36, 48, and 64 weeks.The primary outcome was achieved in 19 (24.7%) intervention group participants and 13 (16.9%) control group participants at 24 weeks (relative risk [RR] 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-2.7). The relative risks of remission at 36, 48, and 64 weeks were 2.4 (95% CI, 1.2-5.0), 2.1 (95% CI, 1.0-4.4), and 1.8 (95% CI, 0.7-4.7), respectively. In an exploratory analysis, the intervention reduced the hazard of diabetes relapse with overt hyperglycemia by 43% (hazard ratio 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39-0.81).Our primary outcome of diabetes remission at 24 weeks was not statistically significantly different. However, our overall results suggest that some patients with early type 2 diabetes are able to achieve sustained diabetes remission following a short-term intensive intervention. Further studies are needed to optimize the combined therapeutic approach used.

We hypothesized that islet autoimmunity, hitherto considered the pathophysiologic basis of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and latent autoimmune diabetes of adults (LADA), could contribute to ß cell dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). To evaluate this question, the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness (GRADE) Study - Beta Cell Ancillary Study Network measured humoral islet autoimmunity (autoantibodies against 65 kDa glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65-Ab), islet autoantigen-2 (IA2-Ab) and zinc transporter-8 (ZnT8-Ab)) in 392 participants (age 57.2 ± 10.1 y; BMI 33.5 ± 6.2 kg/m2; diabetes duration 4.0 ± 3.0 y; HbA1c 7.5 ± 0.5 %; on metformin as the sole glucose-lowering medication), and cellular islet autoimmunity (T cell autoreactivity against a broad range of islet antigens) in 322 of the same participants. 41.4% had evidence of cellular islet autoimmunity and 13.5% had evidence of humoral islet autoimmunity, but only 5.4% had both. T cell autoreactivity to islet antigens, but not autoantibody-positivity, was associated with diminished ß cell function, as assessed by the ratio of incremental area under the curve (iAUC) of C-peptide to iAUC of glucose during 0-120 min of an OGTT (ß = -0.1403; se = 0.0612; p = 0.0219) or ∆C-peptide/∆glucose during 0-30 min of an OGTT (ß = -0.2113; se = 0.0728; p = 0.0037), adjusted for insulin sensitivity. T cell positive participants also had higher fasting plasma glucose (p = 0.045) and HbA1c (p = 0.001) than T cell negative participants. These findings indicate that islet autoimmunity in T2D patients is far more prevalent than previously recognized; T cell mediated islet autoimmunity is associated with diminished ß cell function. Disclosure B. Brooks-Worrell: None. C.S. Hampe: None. E.V. Gonzalez: None. B.M. Palomino: None. S.Z. Zangeneh: None. K. Utzschneider: Other Relationship; Self; Medtronic. S.E. Kahn: Advisory Panel; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Intarcia Therapeutics, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC., Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S, Pfizer Inc. M.E. Larkin: None. M.L. Johnson: Consultant; Self; Jaeb Center for Health Research. Research Support; Self; Abbott, Dexcom, Inc., Insulet Corporation, JDRF, Lilly Diabetes, Medtronic, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Novo Nordisk Inc. K.J. Mather: Research Support; Self; Abbott, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi. N. Younes: None. N. Rasouli: Advisory Panel; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc. Research Support; Self; Allergan plc., Novo Nordisk Inc. C. Desouza: Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Novo Nordisk A/S. R.M. Cohen: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Bristol-Myers Squibb. J.Y. Park: None. H. Florez: None. W. Valencia: None. A. Shojaie: None. J.P. Palmer: None. A. Balasubramanyam: None. Funding National Institutes of Health (R01DK104832, U01DK098246)

Aims To assess whether meeting both fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c criteria for prediabetes in people at high risk indicates with near certainty the presence of dysglycemia on repeat testing. Methods Observational study using data from Vitamin D and Type 2 Diabetes (D2d) study. HbA1c, FPG were measured at screening visit 1; FPG, HbA1c and 2 h plasma glucose (2hPG) measured at screening visit 2 (a median of 21 days later); participants classified as having normal glucose regulation (all 3 tests in normal range), prediabetes or diabetes (at least 1 of 3 tests in diabetes range). A predictive model was developed to estimate the probability of confirming dysglycemia and for detecting diabetes at screening visit 2 based on values of FPG and HbA1c at screening visit 1. Results Of 1271 participants who met both FPG and HbA1c criteria for prediabetes at screening visit 1, 98.6% exhibited dysglycemia (defined as prediabetes or diabetes) on repeat testing (84.5% were classified as having prediabetes, 14.1% were reclassified as having diabetes). Of those with diabetes, 62.6% were identified by 2hPG alone. Conclusions Combined measurement of FPG and HbA1c is a reliable and reproducible measure to identify presence of dysglycemia among people at high risk. A prediction model is provided to help clinicians decide whether an oral glucose tolerance test will provide value in detecting diabetes based on the 2hPG criterion., Highlights • FPG and HbA1c were tested simultaneously to identify patients with prediabetes. • Median 21 days later, repeat evaluation with FPG, HbA1c and an OGTT to measure the 2hPG criterion was done. • 98.6% of the subjects exhibited dysglycemia (prediabetes (84.5%) or diabetes (14.1%)) on repeat testing. • A prediction model to assess additional value of OGTT in detecting diabetes based on the 2hPG criterion is provided.

Diabetic gastroparesis is defined as delayed gastric emptying without mechanical obstruction in the setting of diabetes. Symptoms range from mild bloating to severe vomiting episodes and can result in frequent hospitalizations and poor quality of life. It is suspected that diabetic gastroparesis is underdiagnosed due to its similar presentation to other conditions such as gastroesophageal reflux disease. The pathogenesis of diabetic gastroparesis remains unclear, but proposed mechanisms include vagal dysfunction, hyperglycemia, interstitial cells of Cajal network disturbances, loss of neural nitric oxide synthase expression in the myenteric plexus, and oxidative stress. Current management for diabetic gastroparesis focuses on dietary and lifestyle changes as well as improved glycemic control. Limited options for medical therapies are available that include prokinetic and antiemetic medications. Metoclopramide is the only FDA-approved medication for the treatment of gastroparesis. Metoclopramide improves symptoms of gastroparesis although extended treatment presents challenges such as decreased efficacy over time and increased risks for adverse events. We summarize the current knowledge of the pathophysiology of diabetic gastroparesis and review current and investigational treatments for diabetes gastroparesis.

OBJECTIVE To describe baseline characteristics of the Vitamin D and Type 2 Diabetes (D2d) study, the first large U.S. diabetes prevention clinical trial to apply current American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria for prediabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This is a multicenter (n = 22 sites), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, primary prevention clinical trial testing effects of oral daily 4,000 IU cholecalciferol (D3) compared with placebo on incident diabetes in U.S. adults at risk for diabetes. Eligible participants were at risk for diabetes, defined as not meeting criteria for diabetes but meeting at least two 2010 ADA glycemic criteria for prediabetes: fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 100–125 mg/dL, 2-h postload glucose (2hPG) after a 75-g oral glucose load 140–199 mg/dL, and/or a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 5.7–6.4% (39–46 mmol/mol). RESULTS A total of 2,423 participants (45% of whom were women and 33% nonwhite) were randomized to cholecalciferol or placebo. Mean (SD) age was 60 (9.9) years and BMI 32.1 (4.5) kg/m2. Thirty-five percent met all three prediabetes criteria, 49% met the FPG/HbA1c criteria only, 9.5% met the 2hPG/FPG criteria only, and 6.3% met the 2hPG/HbA1c criteria only. Black participants had the highest mean HbA1c and lowest FPG concentration compared with white, Asian, and other races (P < 0.01); 2hPG concentration did not differ among racial groups. When compared with previous prediabetes cohorts, the D2d cohort had lower mean 2hPG concentration but similar HbA1c and FPG concentrations. CONCLUSIONS D2d will establish whether vitamin D supplementation lowers risk of diabetes and will inform about the natural history of prediabetes per contemporary ADA criteria.

Background: Diabetes is characterized by hyperglycemia with heterogeneous pathophysiological features and varied presentation and consequences. Here, we present a rare case of diabetes that was complicated with insulinoma making glycemia management complicated. Clinical Case: A 48-year-old white man was diagnosed with diabetes when he presented with weight loss, polyuria and polydipsia and HbA1c of 11%. He was treated with oral agents for few months without a good response then switched to insulin. He was assumed to have type 1 diabetes and had fairly well controlled glycemia on multi daily injection of insulin. He was diagnosed with a metastatic non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PTEN) 9 years later. He presented with epigastric pain and CT scan showed a mass in the pancreas tail and multiple lesions in liver. The tumor was immunopositive for S100, synaptophysin, and chromogranin. He was first treated with sunitinib and later switched to Everolimus. He underwent treatment with SIR-spheres which was complicated with post-embolization syndrome and Diabetes Ketoacidosis (DKA). He was switched back to Everolimus and referred to the endocrinology clinic for management of diabetes with a recent DKA. At the initial evaluation by the endocrinology team, he had BMI of 25 kg/m2, no significant family history of diabetes, no diagnosis of dyslipidemia or hypertension. He had low C-peptide < 0.1 ng/mL (n: 0.8 - 5.2 ng/mL) and negative GAD antibody suggestive of non-immune mediated insulin deficient diabetes. He was treated with basal plus prandial insulin regimen and required about 0.6–0.7 unit/kg of insulin each day. Due to progression of PTEN, he was started on monthly Lanreotide while later Pembrolizumab was added resulting in hypothyroidism with a TSH of 75 mIU/L (n: 0.45 - 5.33 mIU/L) that was treated with Levothyroxine. Meanwhile, his diabetes care was complicated by recurrent hypoglycemic episodes and hypoglycemia unawareness. He gradually decreased the dose of insulin, stopped taking prandial insulin, and finally discontinued basal insulin due to recurrent hypoglycemia. He continued to have hypoglycemia despite stopping insulin. His C-peptide was found to be 3.3 ng/mL with a low BG of 62 mg/dl. Diazoxide was started and despite maximizing the dose, the patient continued experiencing hypoglycemia. He therefore decided to stop taking Diazoxide and only continued monthly Lanreotide. The patient is currently avoiding hypoglycemia by eating frequently (every 3 hours) and has regained his hypoglycemia awareness. Conclusion: This is a rare case of non-immune mediated insulin deficient diabetes complicated by recurrent episodes of hypoglycemia due to a non-functioning PNET converting to a functional tumor producing insulin.

Background Dapagliflozin is a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin as an add-on to adjustable insulin in patients with inadequately controlled type 1 diabetes. Methods DEPICT-1 was a double-blind, randomised, parallel-controlled, three-arm, phase 3, multicentre study done at 143 sites in 17 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18–75 years and had inadequately controlled type 1 diabetes (HbA1c between ≥7·7% and ≤11·0% [≥61·0 mmol/mol and ≤97·0 mmol/mol]) and had been prescribed insulin for at least 12 months before enrolment. After an 8 week lead-in period to optimise diabetes management, patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) using an interactive voice response system to dapagliflozin 5 mg or 10 mg once daily, given orally, or matched placebo. Randomisation was stratified by current use of continuous glucose monitoring, method of insulin administration, and baseline HbA1c. The primary efficacy outcome was the change from baseline in HbA1c after 24 weeks of treatment in the full analysis set, which consisted of all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug. An additional 55 patients who were incorrectly and non-randomly allocated to only dapagliflozin treatment groups were included in the safety analysis set. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02268214; data collection for the present analysis was completed on Jan 4, 2017, and a 28 week extension phase is ongoing. Findings Between Nov 11, 2014, and April 16, 2016, 833 patients were assigned to treatment groups and included in safety analyses (dapagliflozin 5 mg [n=277] vs dapagliflozin 10 mg [n=296] vs placebo [n=260]; 778 of these patients were randomly assigned and included in the full analysis set for efficacy analyses (259 vs 259 vs 260; difference due to randomisation error affecting 55 patients). Mean baseline HbA1c was 8·53% (70 mmol/mol; SD 0·67% [7·3 mmol/mol]). At week 24, both doses of dapagliflozin significantly reduced HbA1c compared with placebo (mean difference from baseline to week 24 for dapagliflozin 5 mg vs placebo was −0·42% [95% CI −0·56 to −0·28; p

BACKGROUND: Observational studies support an association between a low blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and the risk of type 2 diabetes. However, whether vitamin D supplementation lowers the risk of diabetes is unknown. METHODS: We randomly assigned adults who met at least two of three glycemic criteria for prediabetes (fasting plasma glucose level, 100 to 125 mg per deciliter; plasma glucose level 2 hours after a 75-g oral glucose load, 140 to 199 mg per deciliter; and glycated hemoglobin level, 5.7 to 6.4%) and no diagnostic criteria for diabetes to receive 4000 IU per day of vitamin D(3) or placebo, regardless of the baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level. The primary outcome in this time-to-event analysis was new-onset diabetes, and the trial design was event-driven, with a target number of diabetes events of 508. RESULTS: A total of 2423 participants underwent randomization (1211 to the vitamin D group and 1212 to the placebo group). By month 24, the mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level in the vitamin D group was 54.3 ng per milliliter (from 27.7 ng per milliliter at baseline), as compared with 28.8 ng per milliliter in the placebo group (from 28.2 ng per milliliter at baseline). After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, the primary outcome of diabetes occurred in 293 participants in the vitamin D group and 323 in the placebo group (9.39 and 10.66 events per 100 person-years, respectively). The hazard ratio for vitamin D as compared with placebo was 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.04; P = 0.12). The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among persons at high risk for type 2 diabetes not selected for vitamin D insufficiency, vitamin D(3) supplementation at a dose of 4000 IU per day did not result in a significantly lower risk of diabetes than placebo. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; D2d ClinicalTrials.gov number, .)

Metformin is a biguanide that is used as first-line treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and is effective as monotherapy and in combination with other glucose-lowering medications. It is generally well-tolerated with minimal side effects and is affordable. Although the safety and efficacy of metformin have been well-established, there is discussion regarding whether metformin should continue to be the first choice for therapy as other anti-hyperglycemic medications exhibit additional advantages in certain populations. Despite a long-standing history of metformin use, there are limited cardiovascular outcomes data for metformin. Furthermore, the available studies fail to provide strong evidence due to either small sample size or short duration. Recent data from glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor cardiovascular and renal outcomes trials demonstrated additional protection from diabetes complications for some high-risk patients, which has impacted the guidelines for diabetes management. Post-hoc analyses comparing hazard ratios for participants taking metformin at baseline versus not taking metformin are inconclusive for these two groups. There are no data to suggest that metformin should not be initiated soon after the diagnosis of diabetes. Furthermore, the initiation of newer glycemic-lowering medications with cardiovascular benefits should be considered in high-risk patients regardless of glycemic control or target HbA1c. However, cost remains a major factor in determining appropriate treatment.

This study was designed to investigate mechanisms of lipid metabolic inflexibility in human obesity and the ability of fenofibrate (FENO) to increase skeletal muscle fatty acid oxidation (FAO) in primary human skeletal muscle cell cultures (HSkMC) exhibiting metabolic inflexibility. HSkMC from 10 lean and 10 obese, insulin resistant subjects were treated with excess fatty acid for 24 hours (24hFA) to gauge lipid-related metabolic flexibility. Metabolically inflexible HSkMC from obese individuals were then treated with 24hFA in combination with FENO to determine effectiveness for increasing FAO. Mitochondrial enzyme activity and FAO were measured in skeletal muscle from subjects with pre-diabetes (n=11) before and after 10 weeks of fenofibrate in vivo. 24hFA increased FAO to a greater extent in HSkMC from lean vs. obese subjects (+49% vs. +9%, for lean vs. obese, respectively; p

Background: Rates of diabetes for veterans who receive health care through the Veterans Health Administration are higher than rates in the general population. Furthermore, many veterans live in rural locations, far from Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals, thus limiting their ability to readily seek face-to-face endocrinology care for diabetes. Telehealth (TH) technologies present an opportunity to improve access to specialty diabetes care for such patients; however, there is a lack of evidence regarding the ability of TH to improve glycemic control in comparison to traditional face-to-face consultations. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all new endocrinology diabetes consultations at the Denver VA Medical Center over a 1-year period. Results: A total of 189 patients were included in the analysis. In all, 85 patients had received face-to-face (FTF) endocrinology consultation for diabetes and 104 patients had received TH consultation. Subjects were mostly males (94.7%) and the mean age was 62.8 ± 10.1 years old. HbA1c improved from 9.76% (9.40% to 10.11%) to 8.55% (8.20% to 8.91%) ( P < .0001) for the TH group and from 9.56% (9.16% to 9.95%) to 8.62% (8.22% to 9.01%) ( P < .0001) for the FTF group after 1 visit. This change in HbA1c was not significantly different in the TH and FTF groups ( P = .24). TH visits were associated with a hypothetical savings in median distance traveled of 231.2 miles per trip (which equates to $94.79 saved per trip). Conclusions: Endocrinology TH consultations improved short-term glycemic control as effectively as traditional FTF visits in a veteran population with diabetes.

A substantial number of obese individuals are relatively insulin sensitive and the etiology for this variation remains unknown.The primary objective was to detect factors in adipose tissue differentiating obese insulin-sensitive (OBIS) from obese insulin-resistant (OBIR) individuals and investigate whether adipose tissue hypoxia is a contributing factor in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance.This was a cross-sectional study in the general community.Subjects consisted of nondiabetic OBIS and OBIR subjects with similar body mass index, age, and total body fat but different insulin sensitivity index as well as lean insulin-sensitive subjects.There were no interventions.We examined adipocytokines and the expression of candidate genes regulating hypoxia, inflammation, and lipogenesis in adipose tissue and adipose tissue oxygenation.OBIS subjects had increased plasma adiponectin but similar plasma TNFα and leptin levels as compared with OBIR subjects. Genes regulating inflammation (CD68, MCP1, scavenger receptor A, and oxidized LDL receptor 1) were increased by 40%–60% (P.05) in OBIR vs OBIS cohorts. In addition, genes involved in extracellular matrix formation such as collagen VI and MMP7 were up-regulated by 43% and 78% (P.05), respectively, in OBIR vs OBIS. The expression of HIF1α and VEGF gene expression was increased by 37% and 52%, respectively, in OBIR vs OBIS (P.01). Despite the differential expression in hypoxia-related genes, adipose tissue oxygenation measured by a Licox oxygen probe was not different between OBIS and OBIR subjects, but it was higher in lean subjects as compared with obese subjects.We confirmed that adipose tissue inflammation and fibrosis play an important role in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance independent of obesity in humans. Whether hypoxia is simply a consequence of adipose tissue expansion or is related to the pathogenesis of obesity-induced insulin resistance is yet to be understood.

OBJECTIVE: The TG/HDL-C ratio is used as a marker of insulin resistance (IR) in Caucasians; however; there is limited data in other ethnic groups. We hypothesized that the TG/HDL-C ratio is associated with IR in Hispanics and African Americans (AA) and will predict type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A multiethnic cohort from the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Family Study was examined to investigate associations between TG/HDL-C ratio and IR, β-cell function and incident diabetes. The cohort included non-diabetic Hispanics (n=872, 63% female) and AA (n=371, 61% female) followed for 5 years. Insulin sensitivity index (S(I)) and disposition index (DI) from frequently-sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests were used as markers of IR and β-cell function respectively. Incident type 2 diabetes was determined by fasting glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl or initiation of anti-hyperglycemia agents over 5 year follow-up. RESULTS: Higher TG/HDL-C ratio was associated with insulin resistance in both Hispanic and AA men and women (P