Search

The function of the ATP-sensitive potassium channel on two cardioprotective events, calcium preconditioning (CPC) and ischemic preconditioning (IPC), following reperfusion after a period of ischemia is investigated in rabbits. CPC, IPC and a potassium channel opener decreased infarct size significantly. Blocking of the potassium channel mitigated the cardioprotective effects of both IPC and CPC indicating that the ATP-sensitive potassium channel is an important element in these types of cardioprotective mechanism in rabbits.

Evaluates whether activation of potassium adenosine triphosphate (KATP) channels mediate the infarct size-limiting effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) in rabbits. Examination of whether calcium preconditioning can mimic the cardioprotection of IPC; Methodology used to conduct studies.

Background: The optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy for patients with cancer and acute low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is clinically relevant, but evidence is lacking. Prolonged anticoagulation therapy could have a potential benefit for prevention of thrombotic events; however, it could also increase the risk of bleeding., Methods: In a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, randomized clinical trial at 32 institutions in Japan, we randomly assigned patients with cancer and acute low-risk PE of the simplified version of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index score of 1, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive either an 18-month or a 6-month rivaroxaban treatment. The primary end point was recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) at 18 months. The major secondary end point was major bleeding at 18 months according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis. The primary hypothesis was that an 18-month treatment was superior to a 6-month treatment in terms of the primary end point., Results: From February 2021 to March 2023, 179 patients were randomized, and after the exclusion of one patient who withdrew consent, 178 were included in the intention-to-treat population: 89 patients in the 18-month rivaroxaban group and 89 in the 6-month rivaroxaban group. The mean age was 65.7 years; 47% of the patients were men, and 12% had symptoms of PE at baseline. The primary end point of recurrent VTE occurred in 5 of the 89 patients (5.6%) in the 18-month rivaroxaban group and in 17 of the 89 (19.1%) in the 6-month rivaroxaban group (odds ratio, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.09-0.72]; P =0.01). Among 22 recurrent VTE, 5 patients presented with a symptomatic recurrent VTE; recurrent PE occurred in 11 patients, including 2 with main and 4 with lobar PEs; and recurrent deep vein thrombosis was seen in 11 patients, including 3 with proximal deep vein thromboses. The major secondary end point of major bleeding occurred in 7 of the 89 patients (7.8 %) in the 18-month rivaroxaban group and in 5 of the 89 patients (5.6%) in the 6-month rivaroxaban group (odds ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 0.44-4.70]; P =0.55)., Conclusions: In patients with cancer and acute low-risk PE of the simplified version of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index score of 1, the 18-month rivaroxaban treatment was superior to the 6-month rivaroxaban treatment with respect to recurrent VTE events.

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reportedly reduce upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, whether the benefits of PPIs differ in high-risk subgroups is unknown., Methods and Results: Among 24,563 patients undergoing first PCI in the CREDO-Kyoto registry Cohort-2 and -3, we evaluated long-term effects of PPI for UGIB, defined as GUSTO moderate/severe bleeding, in several potential high-risk subgroups. In the study population, 45.6% of patients were prescribed PPIs. Over a median 5.6-year follow-up, PPIs were associated with lower adjusted risk of UGIB (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.80; P<0.001) and a non-significant but numerically lower risk of any gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.71-1.01; P=0.06). PPIs were not associated with a lower risk of GUSTO moderate/severe bleeding (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.94-1.15; P=0.40) or a higher adjusted risk of myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.90-1.12; P=0.97), but were associated with higher adjusted mortality risk (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.09-1.27; P<0.001). The effects of PPIs for UGIB, myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke, and all-cause death were consistent regardless of age, sex, acute coronary syndrome, high bleeding risk, oral anticoagulant use, and type of P2Y 12 inhibitor., Conclusions: PPIs were associated with a lower risk of UGIB and a neutral risk of ischemic events regardless of high-risk subgroup.

Background: Data on the impact of valve position on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and bioprosthetic valves (BPVs) are limited., Methods and Results: The BPV-AF Registry was a multicenter, prospective, observational study involving 894 patients with BPVs and AF. In this post-hoc substudy, patients were classified according to BPV position: aortic (n=588; 65.8%), mitral (n=195; 21.8%), or both (n=111; 12.4%). The primary outcome was a composite of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, heart failure requiring hospitalization, all-cause death, or BPV reoperation. During a mean follow up of 15.3±4.0 months, the primary outcome occurred in 90 (15.3%) patients (12.7/100 patient-years) in the aortic group, 25 (12.8%; 10.2/100 patient-years) in the mitral group, and 16 (14.4%; 11.8/100 patient-years) in the both-valves group (log-rank P=0.621). The unadjusted and adjusted risks were not significant for the mitral and both-valves groups relative to the aortic group (unadjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.80 [0.52-1.25] and 0.92 [0.54-1.57]; adjusted hazard ratio 0.89 [0.51-1.54] and 1.10 [0.58-2.09], respectively). There was no significant difference in the incidence of stroke/systemic embolism or major bleeding among the 3 groups (log-rank P=0.651 and 0.156, respectively)., Conclusions: In patients with BPVs and AF, the risk for the composite outcome was comparable regardless of the BPV position., Competing Interests: H.T. has received remuneration from AstraZeneca plc, Ono Pharmaceutical Company, Limited, Pfizer Inc, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited, Eli Lilly and Company, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Abbott Japan LLC, and Novartis International AG. K.A. has received remuneration from Japan Lifeline, Abbott Medical Japan, Medtronic Japan, BIOTRONIK Japan, TERUMO, and Novartis Pharma. M.I. has received consultancy fees from Abbott Medical Japan LLC, and remuneration from Edwards Lifesciences Corporation. T. Kimura has received remuneration from Abbott Medical Japan LLC, research funding from Research Institute for Production Development, EP-CRSU Co., Ltd, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, and Kowa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, and scholarship funds or donations from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, and Research Institute for Production Development. T.S. has received remuneration from Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd. K.M. has received scholarship funds or donations from Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Terumo Co., Ltd, and Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd. K.T. has received remuneration from Amgen K.K., Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Kowa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Novartis Pharma K.K., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, and Pfizer Japan Inc., research funding from AMI Co., Ltd, Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., EA Pharma Co., Ltd, and Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, scholarship funding from AMI Co., Ltd, Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Johnson & Johnson K.K., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, and is affiliated with the endowed department sponsored by Abbott Japan Co., Ltd, Boston Scientific Japan K.K., Fides-one Inc., GM Medical Co., Ltd, ITI Co., Ltd, Kaneka Medix Co., Ltd, Nipro Corporation, Terumo Co., Ltd, Abbott Medical Co., Ltd, Cardinal Health Japan LLC, Fukuda Denshi Co., Ltd, Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd, Medical Appliance Co., Ltd, and Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd. Y. Sakata has received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd, and scholarship funding from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd, Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, and Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. M.F. is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. T.T. has received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, and Bayer Yakuhin Ltd. K.N. has received research funding from Philips Japan Ltd, Terumo Co., Ltd, TEPCO Power Grid Inc., and Asahi Kasei Pharma Co. Y.F. has received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, and Novartis Pharma K.K. C.I. has received remuneration and research funding from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. K.T. is a member of Circulation Reports’ Editorial Team. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY.)

Background: There are few studies evaluating the prognostic prediction method in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients after bioprosthetic valve (BPV) replacement. The R 2 -CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score is increasingly used for the prediction of cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with AF, device implantation, and acute coronary syndrome. We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the R 2 -CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score for future CV events in AF patients after BPV replacement., Methods and Results: The BPV-AF, an observational, multicenter, prospective registry, enrolled AF patients who underwent BPV replacement. The primary outcome measure was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, CV events including heart failure requiring hospitalization, and cardiac death. A total of 766 patients was included in the analysis. The mean R 2 -CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was 5.7±1.8. Low (scores 0-1), moderate (scores 2-4), and high (scores 5-11) R 2 -CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score groups consisted of 12 (1.6%), 178 (23.2%), and 576 (75.2%) patients, respectively. The median follow-up period was 491 (interquartile range 393-561) days. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a higher incidence of the composite CV events in the high R 2 -CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score group (log rank test; P<0.001). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that the R 2 -CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score as a continuous variable was an independent predictor of composite CV outcomes (hazard ratio 1.36; 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.55; P<0.001)., Conclusions: The R 2 -CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score is useful for CV risk stratification in AF patients after BPV replacement., Competing Interests: H.T. has received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca PLC and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. K.A. has received remuneration from Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd, Terumo Corporation, and Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd. M.I. has received consultancy fees from Abbott Medical Japan LLC, and remuneration from Edwards Lifesciences Corporation. T.S. has received remuneration from Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd. K.M. has received scholarship funds or donations from Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Terumo Co., Ltd, and Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd. K.M. has received scholarship funds or donations from Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Terumo Co., Ltd., and Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd. K.T. is a member of Circulation Reports’ Editorial Team, and has received remuneration from Amgen K.K., Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Kowa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Novartis Pharma K.K., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, and Pfizer Japan Inc.; research funding from AMI Co., Ltd, Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., EA Pharma Co., Ltd, and Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd; scholarship funding from AMI Co., Ltd, Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Johnson & Johnson K.K., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd; and is affiliated with the endowed department sponsored by Abbott Japan Co., Ltd, Boston Scientific Japan K.K., Fides-one Inc., GM Medical Co., Ltd, ITI Co., Ltd, Kaneka Medix Co., Ltd, Nipro Corporation, Terumo Co., Ltd, Abbott Medical Co., Ltd, Cardinal Health Japan LLC, Fukuda Denshi Co., Ltd, Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd, Medical 3 Appliance Co., Ltd, and Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd. Y. Sakata has received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd; and scholarship funding from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd, Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, and Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. K.S. is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. K.N. has received research funding from Philips Japan Ltd, Terumo Co., Ltd, TEPCO Power Grid Inc., and Asahi Kasei Pharma Co. C.I. has received remuneration and research funding from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. Y.F. has received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, and Bayer Yakuhin Ltd. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclosure., (Copyright © 2024, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY.)

Background: Patients with appropriately selected low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) can be treated at home, although it has been controversial whether applies to patients with cancer, who are considered not to be at low risk.Methods and Results: The current predetermined companion report from the ONCO PE trial evaluated the 3-month clinical outcomes of patients with home treatment and those with in-hospital treatment. The ONCO PE trial was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial among 32 institutions in Japan investigating the optimal duration of rivaroxaban treatment in cancer-associated PE patients with a score of 1 using the simplified version of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI). Among 178 study patients, there were 66 (37%) in the home treatment group and 112 (63%) in the in-hospital treatment group. The primary endpoint of a composite of PE-related death, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding occurred in 3 patients (4.6% [0.0-9.6%]) in the home treatment group and in 2 patients (1.8% [0.0-4.3%]) in the in-hospital treatment group. In the home treatment group, there were no cases of PE-related death or recurrent VTE, but major bleeding occurred in 3 patients (4.6% [0.0-9.6%]), and 2 patients (3.0% [0.0-7.2%]) required hospitalization due to bleeding events., Conclusions: Active cancer patients with PE of sPESI score=1 could be potential candidates for home treatment.

Background: The left atrial volume index (LAVI) is important for predicting thromboembolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), but the utility of LAVI for predicting thromboembolism in patients with both bioprosthetic valve replacement and AF remains unclear. Methods and Results: Of 894 patients from a previous multicenter prospective observational registry (BPV-AF Registry), 533 whose LAVI data had been obtained by transthoracic echocardiography were included in this subanalysis. Patients were divided into tertiles (T1-T3) according to LAVI as follows: T1 (n=177), LAVI=21.5-55.3 mL/m 2 ; T2 (n=178), LAVI=55.6-82.1 mL/m 2 ; T3 (n=178), LAVI=82.5-408.0 mL/m 2 . The primary outcome was defined as either stroke or systemic embolism for a mean (±SD) follow-up period of 15.3±4.2 months. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that the primary outcome tended to occur more frequently in the group with the larger LAVI (log-rank P=0.098). Comparison of T1 with T2 plus T3 using Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that patients in T1 experienced significantly fewer primary outcomes (log-rank P=0.028). Furthermore, univariate Cox proportional hazard regression showed that 1.3- and 3.3-fold more primary outcomes occurred in T2 and T3, respectively, than in T1. Conclusions: Larger LAVI was associated with stroke or systemic embolism in patients who had undergone bioprosthetic valve replacement and with a definitive diagnosis of AF., Competing Interests: H.T. has received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca PLC and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Novartis International AG, and Pfizer Japan Inc. K.A. has received remuneration from Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd., Terumo Corporation, and Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd. M.I. has received consultancy fees from Abbott Medical Japan LLC and remuneration from Edwards Lifesciences Corporation. Takeshi Kimura has received remuneration from Abbott Medical Japan LLC; research funding from Research Institute for Production Development, EP-CRSU Co., Ltd., Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, and Kowa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; and scholarship funds or donations from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., and Research Institute for Production Development. T.S. has received remuneration from Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd. K.M. has received scholarship funds or donations from Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Terumo Co., Ltd., and Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd. K.T. has received remuneration from Amgen K.K., Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Kowa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Novartis Pharma K.K., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Pfizer Japan Inc.; research funding from AMI Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., EA Pharma Co., Ltd., and Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; scholarship funding from AMI Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Johnson & Johnson K.K., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; and is affiliated with the endowed department sponsored by Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., Boston Scientific Japan K.K., Fides-one Inc., GM Medical Co., Ltd., ITI Co., Ltd., Kaneka Medix Co., Ltd., Nipro Corporation, Terumo Co., Ltd., Abbott Medical Co., Ltd., Cardinal Health Japan LLC., Fukuda Denshi Co., Ltd., Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd., Medical Appliance Co., Ltd., and Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd. Y. Sakata has received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.; and scholarship funding from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., and Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. Tetsuya Kimura is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. K.N. has received research funding from Philips Japan Ltd., Terumo Co., Ltd., TEPCO Power Grid Inc., and Asahi Kasei Pharma Co. Y.F. has received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Novartis Pharma K.K. C.I. has received remuneration and research funding from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. K.T. is a member of Circulation Reports’ Editorial Team. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY.)

Background: Current guidelines equally recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with a bioprosthetic valve (BPV); however, there are limited data comparing DOACs and warfarin in AF patients with an aortic BPV., Methods and results: This post-hoc subgroup analysis of a multicenter, prospective, observational registry (BPV-AF Registry) aimed to compare DOACs and warfarin in AF patients with an aortic BPV. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, heart failure requiring hospitalization, all-cause death, or BPV reoperation. The analysis included 479 patients (warfarin group, n=258; DOAC group, n=221). Surgical aortic valve replacement was performed in 74.4% and 36.7% of patients in the warfarin and DOAC groups, respectively. During a mean follow up of 15.5 months, the primary outcome occurred in 45 (17.4%) and 32 (14.5%) patients in the warfarin and DOAC groups, respectively. No significant difference was found in the primary outcome between the 2 groups (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.51-1.50). No significant multiplicative interaction was observed between the anticoagulant effects and type of aortic valve procedure (P=0.577)., Conclusions: Among AF patients with an aortic BPV, no significant difference was observed in the composite outcome of adverse clinical events between patients treated with warfarin and those treated with DOACs, suggesting that DOACs can be used as alternatives to warfarin in these patients.

Background: Optimal intensity is unclear for P2Y 12 receptor blocker therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in real-world clinical practice., Methods and results: From the CREDO-Kyoto Registry, the current study population consisted of 25,419 patients (Cohort-2: n=12,161 and Cohort-3: n=13,258) who underwent their first PCI. P2Y 12 receptor blocker therapies were reduced dose of ticlopidine (200 mg/day), and global dose of clopidogrel (75 mg/day) in 87.7% and 94.8% of patients in Cohort-2 and Cohort-3, respectively. Cumulative 3-year incidence of GUSTO moderate/severe bleeding was significantly higher in Cohort-3 than in Cohort-2 (12.1% and 9.0%, P<0.0001). After adjusting 17 demographic factors and 9 management factors potentially related to the bleeding events other than the type of P2Y 12 receptor blocker, the higher bleeding risk in Cohort-3 relative to Cohort-2 remained significant (hazard ratio (HR): 1.52 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37-1.68, P<0.0001). Cohort-3 compared with Cohort-2 was not associated with lower adjusted risk for myocardial infarction/ischemic stroke (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.87-1.06, P=0.44)., Conclusions: In this historical comparative study, Cohort-3 compared with Cohort-2 was associated with excess bleeding risk, which might be at least partly explained by the difference in P2Y 12 receptor blockers.

Background: Although bioprosthetic valve (BPV) replacements are becoming more common within our aging society, there are limited prospective data on the appropriate antithrombotic therapy for East Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and BPV replacement. Antithrombotic therapy and thrombotic and hemorrhagic event rates in Japanese patients with AF and BPV replacement are investigated., Methods and results: This multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolled patients with BPV replacement and AF. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke or systemic embolism, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Of the 894 patients analyzed, 54.7%, 29.4%, and 9.6%, were treated with warfarin-based therapy, direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-based therapy, or antiplatelet therapy without anticoagulants, respectively; 6.3% did not receive any antithrombotic drugs. The mean observation period was 15.3±4.0 months. The event rates for stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding were 1.95%/year and 1.86%/year, respectively. The multivariate adjusted hazard ratios for DOAC vs. warfarin were 1.02 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.30-3.41 [P=0.979]) for systemic embolic events and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.29-3.16 [P=0.945]) for major bleeding., Conclusions: Approximately 30% of patients with AF and BPV replacement were treated with DOAC. The risks of major bleeding and stroke or systemic embolism were similar between warfarin- and DOAC-treated patients with AF who had BPV replacement. Treatment with DOACs could be an alternative to warfarin in this population.

Background: Data evaluating the effects of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) relative to stable coronary artery disease (CAD) on bleeding risk after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are scarce., Methods and results: From the CREDO-Kyoto Registry Cohort-3, 13,258 patients undergoing first PCI (5,521 ACS; 7,737 stable CAD) were identified. Patients were further stratified according to ACS presentation and Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk (HBR): ACS/HBR: n=2,502; ACS/no-HBR: n=3,019; stable CAD/HBR: n=3,905; and stable CAD/no-HBR: n=3,832. The primary bleeding endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3/5 bleeding, whereas the primary ischemic endpoint was myocardial infarction (MI)/ischemic stroke. Compared with stable CAD, ACS was associated with a significantly higher adjusted risk for bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.68-2.03; P<0.0001), with a markedly higher risk within 30 days (HR 4.24; 95% CI 3.56-5.06; P<0.0001). Compared with the stable CAD/no-HBR group, the ACS/HBR, no-ACS/HBR, and ACS/no-HBR groups were associated with significantly higher adjusted risks for bleeding, with HRs of 3.05 (95% CI 2.64-3.54; P<0.0001), 1.89 (95% CI 1.66-2.15; P<0.0001), and 1.69 (95% CI 1.45-1.98; P<0.0001), respectively. There was no excess adjusted risk of the ACS relative to stable CAD group for MI/ischemic stroke (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.94-1.22; P=0.33)., Conclusions: Bleeding risk after PCI depended on both ACS presentation and HBR, with a significant effect of ACS within 30 days.

Background Heart failure might be an important determinant in choosing coronary revascularization modalities. There was no previous study evaluating the effect of heart failure on long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) relative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods and Results Among 14 867 consecutive patients undergoing first coronary revascularization with PCI or isolated CABG between January 2011 and December 2013 in the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG registry Cohort-3, we identified the current study population of 3380 patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease, and compared clinical outcomes between PCI and CABG stratified by the subgroup based on the status of heart failure. There were 827 patients with heart failure (PCI: N=511, and CABG: N=316), and 2553 patients without heart failure (PCI: N=1619, and CABG: N=934). In patients with heart failure, the PCI group compared with the CABG group more often had advanced age, severe frailty, acute and severe heart failure, and elevated inflammatory markers. During a median 5.9 years of follow-up, there was a significant interaction between heart failure and the mortality risk of PCI relative to CABG (interaction P =0.009), with excess mortality risk of PCI relative to CABG in patients with heart failure (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.28-2.42; P <0.001) and no excess mortality risk in patients without heart failure (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.80-1.34; P =0.77). Conclusions There was a significant interaction between heart failure and the mortality risk of PCI relative to CABG with excess risk in patients with heart failure and neutral risk in patients without heart failure.