Search

Even under isometric conditions, muscle contractions are associated with some degree of fiber shortening. The effects of muscle shortening on extracellular electromyographic potentials have not been characterized in detail. Moreover, the anatomical, biophysical, and detection factors influencing the muscle-shortening effects have been neither identified nor understood completely. Herein, we investigated the effects of muscle shortening on the amplitude and duration characteristics of single-fiber, motor unit, and compound muscle action potentials. We found that, at the single-fiber level, two main factors influenced the muscle-shortening effects: (1) the electrode position and distance relative to the myotendinous zone and (2) the electrode distance to the maxima of the dipole field arising from the stationary dipole created at the fiber-tendon junction. Besides, at the motor unit and muscle level, two additional factors were involved: (3) the overlapping between the propagating component of some fibers with the non-propagating component of other fibers and (4) the spatial spreading of the fiber-tendon junctions. The muscle-shortening effects depend critically on the electrode longitudinal distance to the myotendinous zone. When the electrode was placed far from the myotendinous zone, muscle shortening resulted in an enlargement and narrowing of the final (negative) phase of the potential, and this enlargement became less pronounced as the electrode approached the fiber endings. For electrode locations close to the myotendinous zone, muscle shortening caused a depression of both the main (positive) and final (negative) phases of the potential. Beyond the myotendinous zone, muscle shortening led to a decrease of the final (positive) phase. The present results provide reference information that will help to identify changes in MUPs and M waves due to muscle shortening, and thus to differentiate these changes from those caused by muscle fatigue. Graphical abstract

The study of the anatomy and physiology of the motor unit has important implications in the diagnosis and follow-up of neuromuscular pathologies. Muscle action potentials allow the use of electrophysiological techniques based on electromyography (EMG) to make inferences about muscle structure, state and behaviour. Scanning EMG is one such technique that can record the temporal and spatial distribution of electrical activity of a single motor unit, allowing for deep insight into the structure and function of motor units. In this chapter, we describe the scanning EMG technique in detail, both from a technical and clinical point of view. A brief review of the motor unit anatomy and physiology is provided in Section 2. The technique, the apparatus setup, the recording procedure and the signal processing required are described in Section 3. Key results of studies using scanning EMG are reviewed in Section 4, including findings related to motor unit organisation in normal muscle and how changes due to pathology are reflected using this electrophysiological technique. Finally, Section 5 provides some hints regarding the use of scanning EMG in research. This work was supported by the Regional Health Ministry of the Government of Navarre under the project 1312/2010.

According to previous studies, some muscles present a non-homogeneous spatial distribution of its muscle fiber types and motor unit types. However, available muscle models only deal with muscles with homogeneous distributions. In this paper, a new architecture muscle model is proposed to permit the construction of non-uniform distributions of muscle fibers within the muscle cross section. The idea behind is the use of a motor unit placement algorithm that controls the spatial overlapping of the motor unit territories of each motor unit type. Results show the capabilities of the new algorithm to reproduce arbitrary muscle fiber type distributions., {"references":["D. W. Stashuk, \"Simulation of electromyographic signals,\" J. Electromyogr.\nKinesiol., vol. 3, pp. 157-173, 1993.","M. A. Schnetzer, D. G. Ruegg, R. Baltensperger, and J. P. Gabriel,\n\"Three-dimensional model of a muscle and simulation of its surface\nEMG,\" Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2001. Proceedings\nof the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE, vol. 2, pp.\n1038-1043, 2001.","A. Hamilton-Wright and D. W. Stashuk, \"Physiologically based simulation\nof clinical EMG signals,\" IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 52, pp.\n171-183, 2005.","J. Navallas, A. Malanda, L. Gila, J. Rodriguez, and I. Rodriguez,\n\"Mathematical analysis of a muscle architecture model,\" IEEE Trans.\nBiomed. Eng., submitted for publication.","ÔÇöÔÇö, \"New muscle architecture model with uniform motor unit fiber\ndensity,\" IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., submitted for publication.","E. Henneman, G. Somjen, and D. O. Carpenter, \"Functional significance\nof cell size in spinal motorneurons,\" J. Neurophysiol., vol. 28, pp. 560-\n580, 1965.","E. Henneman and C. B. Olson, \"Relations between structure and\nfunction in the design of skeletal muscles,\" J. Neurophysiol., vol. 28,\npp. 581-598, 1965.","H. S. Milner-Brown, R. B. Stein, and R. Yemm, \"The orderly recruitment\nof human motor units during voluntary isometric contractions,\" J.\nPhysiol., vol. 230, pp. 359-370, 1973.","A. J. Fuglevand, D. A. Winter, and A. E. Patla, \"Models of recruitment\nand rate coding organization in motor-unit pools,\" J. Neurophysiol.,\nvol. 70, pp. 2470-2488, 1993.\n[10] S. C. Bodine, R. R. Roy, E. Eldred, and V. R. Edgerton, \"Maximal force\nas a function of anatomical features of motor unit in the cat tibialis\nanterior,\" J. Neurophysiol., vol. 57, pp. 1730-1745, 1987.\n[11] S. Chamberlain and D. M. Lewis, \"Contractile characteristics and\ninnervation ratio of rat soleus motor units,\" J. Physiol., vol. 412, pp.\n1-21, 1989.\n[12] S. Bodine-Fowler, A. Garfinkel, R. R. Roy, and V. R. Edgerton, \"Spatial\ndistribution of muscle fibers within the territory of a motor unit,\" Muscle\nNerve, vol. 13, pp. 1133-1145, 1990.\n[13] K. Kanda and K. Hashizume, \"Factors causing differences in force\noutput among motor units in the cat medialis gastrocnemius muscle,\" J.\nPhysiol., vol. 448, pp. 677-695, 1992.\n[14] S. C. Bodine, A. Garfinkel, R. R. Roy, and V. R. Edgerton, \"Spatial\ndistribution of motor unit fibers in the cat soleus and tibialis anterior\nmuscles: local interactions,\" J. Neurosci., vol. 8, pp. 2142-2152, 1988.\n[15] R. R. Roy, A. Garfinkel, M. Ounjian, J. Payne, A. Hirahara, E. Hsu,\nand V. R. Edgerton, \"Three-dimensional structure of cat tibialis anterior\nmotor units,\" Muscle Nerve, vol. 18, pp. 1187-1195, 1995.\n[16] R. L. Lieber and J. Friden, \"Functional and clinical significance of\nskeletal muscle architecture,\" Muscle Nerve, vol. 23, pp. 1647-1666,\n2000.\n[17] R. M. Enoka and A. J. Fuglevand, \"Motor unit physiology: some\nunresolved issues,\" Muscle Nerve, vol. 24, pp. 4-17, 2001.\n[18] B. Feinstein, B. Lindegard, E. Nyman, and G. Wohlfart, \"Morphologic\nstudies of motor units in normal human muscles,\" Acta Anat, vol. 23,\npp. 127-142, 1955.\n[19] X. Dennett and H. J. H. Fry, \"Overuse syndrome: a muscle biopsy study,\"\nLancet, pp. 905-908, 1988.\n[20] G. C. Elder, K. Bradbury, and R. Roberts, \"Variability of fiber type\ndistributions within human muscles,\" J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 53, pp.\n1473-1480, 1982.\n[21] S. Grotmol, G. K. Totland, H. Kryvi, A. Breistol, B. Essen-Gustavsson,\nand A. Lindholm, \"Spatial distribution of fiber types within skeletal\nmuscle fascicles from standardbred horses,\" Anat. Rec., vol. 268, pp.\n131-136, 2002.\n[22] J. Lexell, K. Henriksson-Larsen, and M. Sjostrom, \"Distribution of\ndifferent fiber types in human skeletal muscles. 2. a study of crosssections\nof the whole m. vastus lateralis,\" Acta Physiol. Scand., vol.\n117, pp. 115-122, 1983.\n[23] F. J. R. Richmond, K. Singh, and B. D. Corneil, \"Marked non-uniformity\nof fiber-type composition in the primate suboccipital muscle obliquus\ncapitis inferior,\" Exp. Brain Res., vol. 125, pp. 14-18, 1999.\n[24] C. A. Knight and G. Kamen, \"Superficial motor units are larger than\ndeeper motor units in human vastus lateralis muscle,\" Muscle Nerve,\nvol. 31, pp. 475-480, 2005.\n[25] R. D. Adams and J. D. Reuck, \"Metrics of muscle,\" in Basic Research in\nMiology. Proceedings of the Second International Congress on Muscle\nDiseases, B. A. Kakulas, Ed., 1971, pp. 3-11."]}