1. Tumor Size Differences Between Preoperative Endoscopic Ultrasound and Postoperative Pathology for Neoadjuvant-Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Predict Patient Outcome
- Author
-
Herbert J. Zeh, Shikhar Uttam, Alessandro Paniccia, Melissa E. Hogg, Kevin McGrath, Adam Slivka, Vikram C. Gorantla, Rohit Das, Katelyn Smith, Roby Antony Thomas, Asif Khalid, Michael S. Landau, Kenneth E. Fasanella, Natalie Seiser, James F. Pingpank, Harkirat Singh, Nathan Bahary, Patrick Henn, Kenneth K. Lee, Brian K. Theisen, Melanie Ongchin, Savreet Sarkaria, Randall E. Brand, Aatur D. Singhi, Brian A. Boone, Amer H. Zureikat, Susannah G. Ellsworth, N. Paul Ohori, Anil K. Dasyam, Jennifer Chennat, Susan Shyu, and John C. Rhee
- Subjects
Endoscopic ultrasound ,Pathology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,endocrine system diseases ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Concordance ,Article ,Endosonography ,Pancreatectomy ,medicine ,Humans ,Grading (tumors) ,Neoadjuvant therapy ,Neoplasm Staging ,Retrospective Studies ,Hepatology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Gastroenterology ,Prognosis ,Neoadjuvant Therapy ,digestive system diseases ,Pancreatic Neoplasms ,Fine-needle aspiration ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,CA19-9 ,Pancreas ,business ,Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The assessment of therapeutic response after neoadjuvant treatment and pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been an ongoing challenge. Several limitations have been encountered when employing current grading systems for residual tumor. Considering endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) represents a sensitive imaging technique for PDAC, differences in tumor size between preoperative EUS and postoperative pathology after neoadjuvant therapy were hypothesized to represent an improved marker of treatment response. METHODS: For 340 treatment-naïve and 365 neoadjuvant-treated PDACs, EUS and pathologic findings were analyzed and correlated with patient overall survival (OS). A separate group of 200 neoadjuvant-treated PDACs served as a validation cohort for further analysis. RESULTS: Among treatment-naïve PDACs, there was a moderate concordance between EUS imaging and postoperative pathology for tumor size (r = 0.726, P < .001) and AJCC 8(th) edition T-stage (r = 0.586, P < .001). In the setting of neoadjuvant therapy, a decrease in T-stage correlated with improved 3-year OS rates (50% vs 31%, P < .001). Through recursive partitioning, a cutoff of ≥47% tumor size reduction was also found to be associated with improved OS (67% vs 32%, P < .001). Improved OS using a ≥47% threshold was validated using a separate cohort of neoadjuvant-treated PDACs (72% vs 36%, P < .001). By multivariate analysis, a reduction in tumor size by ≥47% was an independent prognostic factor for improved OS (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: The difference in tumor size between preoperative EUS imaging and postoperative pathology among neoadjuvant-treated PDAC patients is an important prognostic indicator and may guide subsequent chemotherapeutic management.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF