Search

Aims In breastfeeding women, anti-epileptic therapy can lead to infant toxicities, even with newer anti-epileptic drugs such as levetiracetam. This study assessed levetiracetam breastmilk excretion and its correlation with the maternal oral dose and serum concentrations. Methods Women with epilepsy treated with levetiracetam were recruited to this study and completed a questionnaire. Levetiracetam concentrations were determined in serial breastmilk samples (pre-dose to 12 h post-dose period) and in a single pre-dose maternal serum sample. Results Twenty breastfeeding women and 21 infants (one woman with twins; 16 fully and five partially breastfed infants) participated in this study. The trough breastmilk/serum ratio of levetiracetam was 0.98 ± 0.20. The infant levetiracetam daily dose was 5.39 ± 1.96 and 2.70 ± 0.98 mg. kg-1. d-1 , and the relative infant dose (RID) was 13.8 ± 3.1% and 6.9 ± 1.6% in the fully and partially breastfed infants, respectively. Substantial correlations between the levetiracetam dose, maternal serum and breastmilk trough concentrations, and breastmilk AUC values were found. Three women reported somnolence in their fully breastfed infants, which resolved shortly after switching to partial breastfeeding. All the infants gained weight according to their age. Conclusions Infant levetiracetam exposure via the breastmilk was close to the safety thresholds (trough breastmilk/serum ratio slightly below 1, RID > 10% in fully breastfed infants), and infant somnolescence reports could be related to exposure of the infants to levetiracetam via breastmilk. Further studies are warranted to reveal the short- and long-term safety of levetiracetam in breastfeeding.

Introduction Mebendazole is an effective drug widely used in the treatment of parasitic infections. Although theoretically considered as safe during lactation, no studies have evaluated its potential adverse effects in infants of breastfeeding mothers. Objectives We aimed to evaluate the safety of mebendazole in infants of lactating women treated with the drug. Methods Women referred for consultation regarding mebendazole use were invited to participate in the study. Overall 45 lactating women treated with various protocols of mebendazole were recruited in this case series study. Results Regardless of the treatment protocol used (single or repeated doses) mebendazole was well tolerated and was not associated with any adverse effects in infants of lactating mothers. There was mild GI irritability in two treated women. Conclusion This study provides first evidence in humans as to the safety of mebendazole in breastfeeding. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40268-016-0142-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background: Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic neurological conditions and its treatment during pregnancy is challenging. Levetiracetam (LEV) is an antiepileptic medication frequently used during pregnancy. Only a few small studies have been published on LEV monitoring during pregnancy, demonstrating decreased serum LEV levels during the first and second trimester; however, the most significant decrease was observed during the third trimester of pregnancy. In this study we aimed to evaluate LEV pharmacokinetics during different stages of pregnancy. Methods: We followed up and monitored serum levels of pregnant women treated with LEV for epilepsy. Results: Fifty-nine women with 66 pregnancies during the study period were included. The lowest raw LEV serum concentrations were observed during the first trimester. Compared with the pre-pregnancy period, raw serum concentration was lower by 5.76 mg/L [95% confidence interval (CI) (2.78, 8.75), p = 0.039] during the first trimester. Comparing the decrease in the first trimester with either the second or the third, no significant changes were observed ( p = 0.945, p = 0.866). Compared with pre-pregnancy measurements, apparent clearance was increased by 71.08 L/day [95%CI (16.34, 125.83), p = 0.011] during the first trimester. About 30% of LEV serum levels during pregnancy were below the laboratory quoted reference range. Conclusions: Raw LEV serum levels tend to decrease during pregnancy, mainly during the first trimester contrary to previous reports. Monitoring of LEV serum levels is essential upon planning pregnancy and thereafter if pre-pregnancy LEV levels are to be maintained. However, more studies are needed to assess the correlation with clinical outcome.

BackgroundAnti-epileptic drug therapy is a great challenge for the practitioners during pregnancy and lactation. Levetiracetam (LEV) is commonly prescribed to pregnant women, however, there are only few publications on its use during lactation with small number of participants.ObjectiveTo monitor LEV levels in breast-milk of epileptic mothers treated with LEV.MethodsBreastfeeding women treated with LEV during pregnancy and after delivery were recruited. Milk sample was collected before administration of the drug and other samples were collected at time points of 1,3,6,9, and 12 hours after drug administration. Breastmilk and blood LEV levels were measured using HPLC.ResultsFourteen breastfeeding women participated in the study: 9 infants were fully breastfed whereas 5 were partially breastfed. Maternal average daily dose of LEV was 2517 mg. Average infant´s age was 8 weeks (3–22w). Average infant´s weight 4368 gr (3300–7000 gr). Milk/Plasma LEV concentration ratio was 0.88 (0.23–1.1). Relative Infant Dose (RID) was 40% in partial breast feeding, and 61% in full breastfeeding. Estimated average daily dose that all infants received through milk was 158 mg/d (83–250 mg). The normalized dose for the average infant weight per day was 36 mg, which is 15% less than the maximal daily dose of LEV in infants (max. daily dose in infants 1–6 months in 42 mg/d). No adverse reactions were observed in the breastfeed infants.ConclusionsAlthough the RID of LEV were found to be high, no adverse reactions were observed in the infants; Nevertheless, further studies are needed to elucidate the high variability of LEV excretion into breastmilk.Disclosure(s)Nothing to disclose

Background Current knowledge regarding chronic use of psychotropic medications during breastfeeding is limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of psychotropic monotherapy use during lactation on the breastfed infant. Materials and methods In this prospective study, we followed 280 infants whose mothers contacted the Drug Consultation Center (DCC) at Assaf Harofeh Medical Center between January 2011 and December 2015, seeking information regarding the chronic use of psychotropic medications during lactation. This group was compared with a group of 152 callers, who inquired evidence regarding the use of antibiotics compatible with breastfeeding. Information on adverse effects, physical measures and gross motor developmental milestone achievements of the breastfed infants was obtained during a follow-up telephone interview. At follow up, the median age of the infants in the Psychotropic-drug group was 20 (11–33) months versus 36 (20–48) months in the Antibiotic group (p < 0.001). The outcomes were compared between the groups followed by a propensity score matching to control for difference in baseline characteristics. Results At follow-up, no significant differences between infants in the two groups were observed with regard to height, weight, head circumference and weight-length ratio percentile (p = 0.339, p = 0.223, p = 0.738, p = 0.926, respectively). Children in both groups were, according to their parents, within the normal developmental range for all milestones, according to the Denver Developmental Scale. Use of psychotropic medications during breastfeeding was not significantly associated with adverse reactions. After propensity score matching (n = 120 pairs) to control for differences in baseline characteristics and the length of lactation, only one significant difference was reported, sleepiness in infants in the study group (7/120) and none in the comparison group (p = 0.008). Conclusions Chronic use of psychotropic monotherapy during lactation is associated with normal growth and gross motor developmental as by milestone achievements reported by parents. Sleepiness was reported, it seemed self-limited with no developmental effect.

Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are used in pediatric patients worldwide. However, due to cartilage damage in young animals they are not approved for children under 18 years of age for most indications. Major regulatory authorities such as EMA, FDA, UK, Ireland, NZ and Australia indicate that FQs are contraindicated in children. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin can be prescribed to children, but only for a few indications. As a result, FQs are used “off-label” in this population. From our experience, we believe that FQs should not be contraindicated in children. However, evidence-based data is needed.ObjectiveTo investigate whether FQ use in children may cause musculoskeletal adverse reactions (ADRs).MethodsWe reviewed the Israel Ministry of Health ADR reporting system and VigiLyze (WHO reporting system) for musculoskeletal ADRs due to FQs in children. A literature search– Medline, Pubmed, Cochraine database and pharmacologic textbooks, for musculoskeletal ADRs among FQ treated pediatric patients was conducted. Terms used: Fluoroquinolones, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, arthropathy, tendinophaty, arthralgia, children, pediatric use.ResultsDuring the period 1968 to Feb 2015, the Israeli MOH did not receive spontaneous reports regarding FQs in children. The VigiLyze program identified 192 ADR reports in children related to FQs: arthralgia, arthropathy, myalgia, and tendon injury. Most ADRs were transient and reversible. The literature search indicated that although musculoskeletal ADRs are not uncommon, they are mild, transient, and not necessarily due to FQs. Joint MRI, performed in some of the studies, did not reveal cartilage damage.ConclusionsFQs should be registered for pediatric patients as for adults.