Search

In a retrospective study, we evaluated factors associated with the early development of septic shock in patients with severe COVID-19.We collected medical records of the intensive care unit patients submitted by the local COVID-19 hospitals across Russia to the Federal Center for the Critical Care at the Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University). Septic shock in crticially ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation was defined as a need in vasopressors to maintain blood pressure.We studied 1078 patients with severe COVID-19 who were admitted to the intensive care units for respiratory support. There were 611 males and 467 females. The mean age was 61.013.7 years. Five hundred twenty five medical records (48.7%) were received from the Moscow hospitals, 159 (14.7%) from the Moscow region, and 394 (36.5%) from the hospitals located in 58 regions of the Russian Federation. In 613 (56.9%) patients, diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by PCR, and in the other cases it was established on the basis of the clinical picture and the results of the chest CT scan. Septic shock developed in 214 (19.9%) of 1078 patients. In the logistic regression model, the risk of septic shock in patients older than 50 years was higher than in patients of a younger age (OR 2.34; 95% CI 1.533.67; p0.0001). In patients with more severe SARS-CoV-2 infection, there was an increase in the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, including coronary heart disease and atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes and malignant tumors. The risk of septic shock in patients with three or more concomitant diseases was higher than in patients without any concomitant chronic diseases (OR 1.76; 95% CI 1.762.70).The risk of septic shock in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by SARS-CoV-2 is higher in patients older than 50 years with concomitant diseases, although a severe course of the disease is also possible in younger patients without any concomitant disorders.Цель. Анализ факторов, ассоциированных с ранним развитием септического шока у больных с тяжелым течением COVID-19. Материалы и методы. В исследование включены данные всех пациентов, проконсультированных до 1 мая 2020 г. на базе Федерального дистанционного консультативного центра анестезиологии и реаниматологии на базе ФГАОУ ВО Первый МГМУ им. И.М. Сеченова (Сеченовский Университет). Критерием септического шока считали снижение артериального давления, требовавшее введения вазопрессорных средств. Результаты. В исследование включены 1078 пациентов, 611 (56,7%) мужчин и 467 (43,3%) женщин. Средний возраст составил 61,013,7 года; 525 (48,7%) заявок на консультацию получены из стационаров Москвы, 159 (14,7%) Московской области, 394 (36,5%) лечебных учреждений в 58 регионах Российской Федерации. У 613 (56,9%) больных диагноз SARS-CoV-2-инфекции подтвержден с помощью полимеразной цепной реакции, а в остальных случаях установлен на основании клинической картины и результатов компьютерной томографии органов грудной клетки. Развитие септического шока отмечено у 214 (19,9%) из 1078 больных. В логистической регрессионной модели риск его развития у пациентов старше 50 лет выше, чем у больных более молодого возраста (отношение шансов 2,34; 95% доверительный интервал 1,533,67; р0,0001). У пациентов с более тяжелым течением SARS-CoV-2 отмечалось увеличение частоты сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний в целом, ишемической болезни сердца, фибрилляции предсердий, сахарного диабета 2-го типа, частота злокачественных опухолей выше. Риск развития септического шока у пациентов с тремя и более сопутствующими заболеваниями оказался выше, чем у пациентов без сопутствующих болезней (отношение шансов 1,76; 95% доверительный интервал 1,762,70). Заключение. Риск развития септического шока у пациентов с острым респираторным дистресс-синдромом, вызванным SARS-CoV-2, выше у пациентов старше 50 лет, страдающих несколькими сопутствующими заболеваниями, хотя тяжелое течение заболевания возможно и у более молодых людей без какой-либо сопутствующей патологии.

Various types of sarcomas arise as a result of postradiation chronic fibrous pericarditis. A primary undifferentiated spindle cell pericardial sarcoma is a rare type of sarcoma after radiotherapy. The risk of sarcoma increases with time after treatment of cancer. A 55-year-old woman underwent successful radiation and chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma 20 years ago. She was hospitalized with typical manifestations of severe heart failure. Echocardiography, сomputed tomography of the chest and magnetic resonance imaging scan of the heart detected neoplastic formations of the pericardium. A biopsy of the pericardium was performed. Histological, immunohistochemical, and genetic studies showed a primary undifferentiated spindle cell pericardial sarcoma (an extremely rare type of sarcoma).

This non-randomized controlled study aimed to assess the efficacy of tofacitinib in reducing the risk of invasive mechanical ventilation or death in patients with COVID-19. Patients with COVID-19 associated with reduced oxygen saturation, increased C-reactive protein (≥50 mg/L), and/or persisting fever were recruited. Tofacitinib was administered in addition to standard of care therapy. Study outcomes were evaluated separately in the groups of patients with oxygen saturation at rest ≤93% and >93%. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox regression analysis adjusted for inverse propensity score weighting. Overall, 384 patients with COVID-19 (212 males; median age 60 years) were included in our study and were treated with tofactinib (n=131) or standard of care alone (n=253). The percentages of patients who started mechanical ventilation or died during hospitalization in the tofacitinib and control groups were 12.5% (9/72) vs. 14.1% (26/185) among patients who required respiratory support (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.33-2.56), and 1.7% (1/59) vs. 4.4% (3/68) in those with normal oxygen saturation (HR 0.83; 95 CI 0.07-9.44). Tofacitinib did not reduce the risk of invasive mechanical ventilation or death in patients with COVID-19, although the analysis of these outcomes favored tofacitinib.

Cardiac myxoma is the most common primary benign cardiac tumor (up to 50% of all primary cardiac neoplasms). The implementation of the modern imaging techniques into the clinical practice, particularly, 2D echocardiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance tomography (MRI) results to the prompt diagnosis of the myxoma. However, the absence of specific clinical features, insufficient awareness of this condition among the physicians along with a rare prevalence, may lead to a misdiagnosis. This case report is notable for the relatively late diagnosis of a giant left atrial myxoma due to a number of circumstances but with successful surgical treatment.Миксома сердца является наиболее часто встречающейся первичной доброкачественной кардиальной опухолью (до 50% всех первичных новообразований сердца). Внедрение в клиническую практику современных визуализирующих методов обследования, в частности таких, как двухмерная эхокардиография, компьютерная томография и магнитно-резонансная томография, позволяет осуществлять своевременную диагностику миксом. Однако отсутствие специфических клинических проявлений, недостаточная настороженность врачей в отношении данной патологии в связи с редкой встречаемостью могут привести к ошибочному диагнозу. Особенностью представленного случая является достаточно поздняя, в силу ряда обстоятельств, диагностика гигантской миксомы левого предсердия, но с успешным результатом хирургического лечения.

Primary sarcomas of the pericardium are extremely rare malignant tumors of the heart. The incidence of sarcoma increases after radiation therapy in the field of breast. The specific features of this case report are the difficulties in diagnostics of undifferentiated spindle-cell sarcoma of the pericardium and the connection between the disease and the radiation therapy for Hodgkin’s lymphoma.