Search

Moodle serves as a valuable platform for creating online courses, training, and internet-based education while supporting essential e-Learning content distribution standards, specifically referring to SCORM. This research pursues three primary objectives: (1) the development of Moodle-based e-Learning in SMPN 4 Kolaka Utara, (2) the development of a MOODLE-based e-Learning content package adhering to the SCORM standard, and (3) the comprehensive evaluation of the Moodle-based e-Learning development process. Adopting the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) approach, the outcome of this research is the establishment of an innovative E-learning platform, named mesikolah.com, accessible online via https://mesikolah.com/. These courses meet the stringent SCORM standardization criteria, including Accessibility, Adaptability, Affordability, Durability, Interoperability, and Reusability. Formative evaluation results demonstrate a strong alignment with the chosen research approach, ADDIE, while the summative evaluation reveals positive user feedback, with an impressive 80% satisfaction rate on the e-Learning platform. Although this research focuses on the e-Learning development stage and content package preparation, further investigations are warranted, such as classroom action research. Notably, the current content package predominantly comprises text and flash presentations, necessitating future development of diverse media types, such as video on demand or video streaming.

The school curriculum of Indonesia has changed three times over the same period since 2004. Meanwhile the new curiculum of Philippine was changed in 2012. This study attempted to compare Indonesia 2013 curriculum (K13) with Philippine curriculum K to 12 (K12) regarding their development and enacment while also uncovering the embedded cultural values and influences on both curricula. The discussion also tried to investigate how the two curricula have impacted different stakeholders involved. This research was conducted by reviewing the collated official curriculum documents published by education ministry of the two countries and analysing facts and issues emerged from related studies and articles. The study reveals that the similarity of both curricula reforms lies at the fact that both curricula are deliberately reformed in response to the actual needs of society in each country. Meanwhile, the difference might be seen from the lens of curricula purposes in which K13 was designed to strengthen social and religious values while K-12 was focused on the development of knowledge and skills. The findings suggest that Indonesian curriculum needs to be made more practical instead of being too philosophical while gradual and continuous evaluation in necessary aspects is more recommended than total reforms which tend to result in longer adaptation and transition process.