Search

Supplementary Table 1

Genistein, the major isoflavone in soybean, has been reported to exert anticancer effects on various types of cancer including ovarian cancer; however, its chemopreventive effects and mechanisms of action in ovarian cancer have not been fully elucidated in spontaneously developing ovarian cancer models. In this study, we demonstrated the preventive effects and mechanisms of genistein in the laying hen model that develops spontaneous ovarian cancer at high incidence rates. Laying hens were randomized to three groups: control (3.01 mg/hen, n = 100), low (52.48 mg/hen n = 100), and high genistein supplementation (106.26 mg/hen/day; per group). At the end of 78 weeks, hens were euthanized and ovarian tumors were collected and analyzed. We observed that genistein supplementation significantly reduced the ovarian tumor incidence (P = 0.002), as well as the number and size of the tumors (P = 0.0001). Molecular analysis of the ovarian tumors revealed that genistein downregulated serum malondialdehyde, a marker for oxidative stress and the expression of NFκB and Bcl-2, whereas it upregulated Nrf2, HO-1, and Bax expression at protein level in ovarian tissues. Moreover, genistein intake decreased the activity of mTOR pathway as evidenced by reduced phosphorylation of mTOR, p70S6K1, and 4E-BP1. Taken together, our findings strongly support the potential of genistein in the chemoprevention of ovarian cancer and highlight the effects of the genistein on the molecular pathways involved in ovarian tumorigenesis.

Supplementary Tables

Supplementary Figure S2

Supplementary Figure S3

Supplementary Figures Legends

Supplementary Figure S1

Purpose:On the basis of strong preclinical rationale, we sought to confirm recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, combined with the AKT inhibitor capivasertib and assess molecular markers of response and resistance.Patients and Methods:We performed a safety lead-in followed by expansion in endometrial, triple-negative breast, ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer. Olaparib 300 mg orally twice daily and capivasertib orally twice daily on a 4-day on 3-day off schedule was evaluated. Two dose levels (DL) of capivasertib were planned: 400 mg (DL1) and 320 mg (DL-1). Patients underwent biopsies at baseline and 28 days.Results:A total of 38 patients were enrolled. Seven (18%) had germline BRCA1/2 mutations. The first 2 patients on DL1 experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of diarrhea and vomiting. No DLTs were observed on DL-1 (n = 6); therefore, DL1 was reexplored (n = 6) with no DLTs, confirming DL1 as RP2D. Most common treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events were anemia (23.7%) and leukopenia (10.5%). Of 32 evaluable subjects, 6 (19%) had partial response (PR); PR rate was 44.4% in endometrial cancer. Seven (22%) additional patients had stable disease greater than 4 months. Tumor analysis demonstrated strong correlations between response and immune activity, cell-cycle alterations, and DNA damage response. Therapy resistance was associated with receptor tyrosine kinase and RAS-MAPK pathway activity, metabolism, and epigenetics.Conclusions:The combination of olaparib and capivasertib is associated to no serious adverse events and demonstrates durable activity in ovarian, endometrial, and breast cancers, with promising responses in endometrial cancer. Importantly, tumor samples acquired pre- and on-therapy can help predict patient benefit.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary Figure S5

Supplementary Figure S7

Olaparib treatment resulted in significant improvement in objective response rates (ORRs) and progression-free survival (PFS) over non‑platinum chemotherapy in patients with BRCA1/BRCA2-mutated (BRCAm) platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC) and ≥2 prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy in the phase III SOLO3 study. LIGHT (NCT02983799) prospectively evaluated olaparib treatment for patients with PSROC and known BRCAm and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status.In this phase II open-label multicenter study, patients with PSROC and ≥1 prior line of platinum-based chemotherapy were assigned to cohorts by presence of germline BRCAm (gBRCAm), somatic BRCAm (sBRCAm), HRD-positive tumors without BRCAm, or HRD-negative tumors. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR) and PFS. Tumors were analyzed using Myriad BRACAnalysis CDx and myChoice HRD assays; HRD-positive tumors were defined using a genomic instability score of ≥42.Of 272 enrolled patients, 271 received olaparib and 270 were included in efficacy analyses. At data cut-off, ORRs in the gBRCAm, sBRCAm, HRD-positive, and HRD-negative cohorts were 69.3%, 64.0%, 29.4%, and 10.1%, respectively. DCRs were 96.0%, 100.0%, 79.4%, and 75.3% in each cohort, respectively. Median PFS was 11.0, 10.8, 7.2, and 5.4 months, respectively. The most common (≥ 20%) treatment-emergent adverse events included nausea, fatigue/asthenia, vomiting, anemia, constipation, diarrhea, and decreased appetite.Olaparib treatment demonstrated activity across all cohorts. The greatest efficacy was observed in the BRCAm cohorts, regardless of gBRCAm/sBRCAm. For patients without a BRCAm, greater efficacy was observed in the HRD-positive than the HRD-negative cohorts. The safety profile was consistent with that established in previous olaparib studies.

BackgroundCombining poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) with phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway inhibitors is supported by strong preclinical rationale. We sought to assess safety and determine a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for PARP inhibitor olaparib combined with the AKT inhibitor, capivasertib, and evaluate molecular markers of response and resistance.MethodsAs part of a larger phase 1b trial, we performed a safety lead in of olaparib and capivasertib followed by expansion (n=24) in endometrial, triple negative breast, ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer. Olaparib 300mg orally twice daily and capivasertib orally twice daily on a four day on three day off schedule was evaluated. Two dose levels (DL) were planned: capivasertib 400mg (DL1); capivasertib 320mg (DL-1). Patients underwent biopsies at baseline and after 28 days.Findings38 patients were enrolled. 7 (18%) patients had known germlineBRCA1/2mutations. The first two patients on DL1 experienced dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) of diarrhea and vomiting in absence of maximum supportive care. No DLTs were observed on DL-1 (n=6), therefore, DL1 was re-explored (n=6) with no DLTs, confirming this as RP2D. Most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were anemia (23.7%) and leukopenia (10.5%).Of 32 subjects evaluable for response, 6 (19%) had partial response (PR) with a PR rate of 44.4% in endometrial cancer. Seven (22%) additional patients had stable disease greater than 4 months. Tumor analysis demonstrated strong correlation between response and immune activity, as well as alterations in cell cycle and DNA damage response genes. Therapy resistance was associated with receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and RAS-MAPK pathway activity, as well as metabolism and epigenetics.InterpretationThe combination of olaparib and capivasertib is well tolerated and demonstrates evidence of durable activity in women’s cancers, with particularly promising response in endometrial cancer. Importantly, tumor samples acquired pre and on-therapy can help predict patient benefit.FundingAstraZeneca, MDACC Moonshots Program, MDACC Support Grant CA016672 NCI SPOREs in Ovarian (CA217685) and Uterine (CA098258) Cancer and a kind gift from the Miriam and Sheldon Medical Research Foundation. AZD5363 was discovered by AstraZeneca subsequent to a collaboration with Astex Therapeutics (and its collaboration with the Institute of Cancer Research and Cancer Research Technology Limited).

Objectives: LIGHT (NCT02983799) evaluated olaparib treatment in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed (PSR) ovarian cancer by BRCA mutation (BRCAm) and homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) status; the primary analysis demonstrated objective response rates (ORRs) of 69%, 64%, 29%, and 10% in cohorts of patients with a germline (g) BRCAm, with tumors with somatic (s) BRCAm, HRD-positive (non-BRCAm), and HRD-negative status, respectively (Cadoo K et al. ASCO 2020). Here, we report pre-specified secondary efficacy endpoints and subgroup analyses. Methods: In this open-label, non-randomized study, patients with PSR ovarian cancer and ≥1 prior line of platinum-based chemotherapy received olaparib monotherapy (300 mg bid). Patients were assigned to one of four cohorts based on whether they had a gBRCAm, tumors with sBRCAm, had HRD-positive (non-BRCAm) tumors, or HRD-negative tumors. Testing for gBRCAm was completed using Myriad BRACAnalysis CDx; sBRCAm testing was done with Myriad myChoice CDx. Genomic instability (GI) was assessed using the Myriad myChoice HRD test; tumors were deemed HRD-positive if they had a GI score ≥42. Secondary efficacy endpoints included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS; RECIST v1.1) and cancer antigen (CA)-125 response. Time to any progression (TTAP) was calculated from the date of the first dose of olaparib until the earliest date of RECIST v1.1 or CA-125 disease progression, or death. Results: The analysis was timed ~6 months after the last patient was enrolled (data cut-off, Aug 27, 2019). Of 271 enrolled patients who had received olaparib, 270 had measurable disease at baseline and were included in efficacy analyses (13 patients whose Myriad test result was failed or missing could not be assigned to a cohort; efficacy in these patients was analyzed separately). ORR and PFS by prior line of chemotherapy, CA-125 response, and TTAP are summarized in the Table. ORRs ~60-70% were observed in the gBRCAm and sBRCAm cohorts and ~30% in the HRD-positive (non-BRCAm) cohort, both in patients with 1 or ≥2 prior lines of chemotherapy. Similarly, median PFS in patients was ~10-11 months in the BRCAm cohorts, and ~5-7 months in the HRD-positive (non-BRCAm) cohort, both in patients with 1 or ≥2 prior lines of chemotherapy. In the BRCAm cohorts, a high proportion of patients achieved a CA-125 response and complete response (CR), with a CA-125 CR rate of 60% and 68% in the BRCAm cohorts and 29% in the HRD-positive non-BRCAm cohort. Median TTAP was ~11 months in the BRCAm cohorts, and 7.2 months in the HRD-positive (non-BRCAm) cohort. Download : Download high-res image (147KB) Download : Download full-size image Conclusions: Secondary efficacy data and subgroup analyses from the LIGHT study of olaparib monotherapy as treatment for PSR ovarian cancer support the primary analysis. Efficacy was observed in all cohorts, particularly in the gBRCAm and sBRCAm cohorts, where similar efficacy was observed. For patients without a BRCAm, greater efficacy was seen in the HRD-positive cohort.

5515 Background: LIGHT (NCT02983799) evaluated olaparib Tx in pts with PSR OC in cohorts with known BRCAm and HRD status. We report the final OS analyses. Methods: We conducted anopen-label, non-randomized, multicenter study of pts with PSR OC and ≥1 prior line of platinum-based chemotherapy (CTx). Pts were assigned to one of 4 cohorts: germline (g) BRCAm; somatic (s) BRCAm; HRD +ve (non-BRCAm); and HRD -ve. Genomic instability score (GIS) and gBRCAm status were determined by Myriad myChoice and BRACAnalysis CDx tests, respectively. HRD +ve tumors were defined by a GIS ≥42. Pts received olaparib Tx (starting dose 300 mg bid) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. OS was a secondary endpoint and was analyzed at 12 months (mo) after the primary analysis and 18 mo after the last pt was enrolled. Safety was assessed in pts who received ≥1 dose. Results: Data cut-off (DCO) was Aug 27, 2020. Of 272 enrolled pts, 271 received olaparib; of these, 270 had measurable disease at baseline and were included in efficacy analyses (Table). At DCO, 40% of pts had died (maturity) with a median follow-up in censored pts of 26.3 mo. Kaplan–Meier 18-mo OS rates were 86%, 88%, 79%, and 60% in the gBRCAm, sBRCAm, HRD +ve (non-BRCAm), and HRD -ve cohorts, respectively. Platinum-based CTx was the most common first subsequent Tx and was received by 39% pts after olaparib discontinuation. At DCO, the median duration of Tx was 7.4 mo and 244 pts had discontinued treatment, mainly due to disease progression (72%); 5% discontinued due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The only TEAE leading to discontinuation in >1 pt was nausea (2 pts). Serious TEAEs were reported in 25% of pts. The most common serious TEAE was small intestinal obstruction (6%). Three adverse events of special interest occurred, each in 1 pt (

6013 Background: In Study 19 (NCT00753545), olaparib capsules demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo in the PSR OC maintenance setting, irrespective of BRCAm status (Ledermann et al. Lancet Oncol 2014). LIGHT is the first prospective study to evaluate olaparib tablet treatment in PSR OC pts by BRCAm and HRD status. Methods: This is an open-label, non-randomized study (NCT02983799) that assessed efficacy and safety of olaparib monotherapy (300 mg BID) in pts with PSR, high-grade serous/endometrioid epithelial OC and ≥1 prior line of platinum chemotherapy. Pts were assigned to one of four cohorts: germline (g) BRCAm; somatic (s) BRCAm; HRD+ve (non-BRCAm); HRD–ve; by Myriad BRACAnalysis CDx and myChoice tests. HRD+ve was a score ≥42. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included: disease control rate (DCR) and investigator-assessed PFS (RECIST v1.1). Primary analysis was to be ~6 months (mo) after the last pt was enrolled. Results: Data cut off was 8/27/19. Of 271 pts treated (median of 31.7 weeks [2.1–96.0]), 270 had measurable disease at baseline and were included in efficacy analyses (Table). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were nausea (66%) and fatigue (62%).Serious AEs and Grade ≥3 AEs were experienced by 25% and 44% of pts, respectively. AEs leading to olaparib dose interruptions, reductions and discontinuations occurred in 33%, 24% and 4% of pts, respectively. Conclusions: Olaparib treatment demonstrated activity across all cohorts. As observed in the maintenance setting, similar efficacy was seen in the gBRCAm and sBRCAm cohorts. For non-BRCAm pts, longer median PFS and higher ORR were observed in the HRD+ve cohort. Olaparib treatment was well tolerated with no new safety signals identified and a safety profile consistent with that seen in the PSR and first-line settings. Clinical trial information: NCT02983799. [Table: see text]