Search

We study the problem of decentralized power allocation in a multi-access channel (MAC) with non-cooperative users, additive noise of arbitrary distribution and a generalized power constraint, i.e., the transmit power constraint is modeled by an upper bound on $\mathbb{E}[\phi(|S|)]$, where $S$ is the transmit signal and $\phi(.)$ is some non-negative, increasing and bounded function. The generalized power constraint captures the notion of power for different wireless signals such as RF, optical, acoustic, etc. We derive the optimal power allocation policy when there a large number of non-cooperative users in the MAC. Further, we show that, once the number of users in the MAC crosses a finite threshold, the proposed power allocation policy of all users is optimal and remains invariant irrespective of the actual number of users. We derive the above results under the condition that the entropy power of the MAC, $e^{2h(S)+c}$, is strictly convex, where $h(S)$ is the maximum achievable entropy of the transmit signal and $c$ is a finite constant corresponding to the entropy of the additive noise.

We consider a scenario where $N$ users send packets to a common access point. The receiver decodes the message of each user by treating the other user's signals as noise. Associated with each user is its channel state and a finite queue which varies with time. Each user allocates his power and the admission control variable dynamically to maximize his expected throughput. Each user is unaware of the states, and actions taken, by the other users. This problem is formulated as a Markov game for which we show the existence of equilibrium and an algorithm to compute the equilibrium policies. We then show that when the number of users exceeds a particular threshold, the throughput of all users at all the equilibria are the same. Furthermore the equilibrium policies of the users are invariant as long as the number of users remain above the latter threshold. We also show that each user can compute these policies using a sequence of linear programs which does not depend upon the parameters of the other users. Hence, these policies can be computed by each user without any information or feedback from the other users. We then provide numerical results which verify our theoretical results.

We consider a scenario where N users try to access a common base station. Associated with each user is its channel state and a finite queue which varies with time. Each user chooses his power and the admission control variable in a dynamic manner so as to maximize his expected throughput. The throughput of each user is a function of the actions and states of all users. The scenario considers the situation where each user knows his channel and buffer state but is unaware of the states and actions taken by the other users. We consider the scenario when each user is saturated (i.e., always has a packet to transmit) as well as the case when each user is unsaturated. We formulate the problem as a Markov game and show connections with strategic form games. We then consider various throughput functions associated with the multiple user channel and provide algorithms for finding these equilibria.

This paper considers the problem of spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks when the primary user employs Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM). We develop cooperative sequential detection algorithms based on energy detectors and the autocorrelation property of cyclic prefix (CP) used in OFDM systems and compare their performances. We show that sequential detection provides much better performance than the traditional fixed sample size (snapshot) based detectors. We also study the effect of model uncertainties such as timing and frequency offset, IQ-imbalance and uncertainty in noise and transmit power on the performance of the detectors. We modify the detectors to mitigate the effects of these impairments. The performance of the proposed algorithms are studied via simulations. It is shown that energy detector performs significantly better than the CP-based detector, except in case of a snapshot detector with noise power uncertainty. Also, unlike for the CP-based detector, most of the above mentioned impairments have no effect on the energy detector., Comment: 24 pages