Search

A national project for the quality assessment of breast immunohistochemistry, involving 155 pathology laboratories distributed all over the Italian territory ( 19 regions), was carried out. The Project lasted one year from December 2014 to December 2015 and it was strongly supported by the Italian Society of Anatomic Pathology (SIAPEC/IAP). Proficiency tests were carried out by the Nordic Immunohistochemical Quality Control (NordiQC) organization. The main aim of the project was to investigate on the general performance of immunohistochemistry (ER, PR and HER2) in the field of breast cancer in the Italian territory, in order to emphasize any difference and give practical support to laboratories in daily practice.The present review article focused on the description of this extraordinary pioneer Italian experience. Besides NordiQC results, further analysis concerning epidemiology and geographical distribution were done.Aim of the study was to analyze the general results and to discuss on the benefits that a national quality control program may have if it became a mandatory service provided by the National Health Care System.In general, the Italian data were in accordance with the general results obtained from the "official" NordiQC HER2, PR and ER assessments. A HER2 scoring consensus between labs and assessor group was achieved in 80% of cases.Interestingly, what emerges from our study is that no substantial differences exist among the three Italian macro-areas (North, Center and South) in the quality of Immunohistochemistry performed for breast cancer. No statistically significant difference was even found between laboratories that perform more or less than 100 tests/year.

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/96536

A morphometric study was performed on the thyreocytes and Hürthle cells in 20 cases of nodular hyperplastic goiter (NHG) and in 8 cases of Hürthle cell-rich NHG. The study was carried out on cytologic samples obtained by fine needle aspiration twice from the same nodules in a selected series of patients before and after L-thyroxine therapy with the aim of evaluating the morphometric nuclear variations induced by that therapy. Thyreocytes and Hürthle cells were evaluated for nuclear Area, Perimeter, Maximum Diameter, Form Elliptic and Form Perimeter using a planimetric instrument. A statistically significant reduction in nuclear size was observed in 18 of 20 cases of NHG after L-thyroxine therapy, but the nuclear shape factors were modified only slightly or not at all. A slight reduction in the nuclear size of Hürthle cells was observed in five and an increase in the remaining three cases, but these differences were not statistically significant. Virtually no changes in shape factors were observed in this group of lesions before or after the therapy. These data are discussed and compared to the results of other series. Our results suggest that morphometry may be useful in the follow-up of NHG to evaluate the effects of L-thyroxine and that this therapy reduces the size of thyreocytes; the therapy, however, seems to have little or no effect on Hürthle cells.

The tumor designated by Stout and Murray as "hemangiopericytoma" (HPC) more than 50 years ago continues to represent a source of uncertainty and disagreement among pathologists. In particular, questions exist regarding the synonymity of a hemangiopericytomatous growth pattern--defined by a monomorphic population of compact polygonal or bluntly fusiform cells and a branching stromal vascular pattern with a "staghorn" configuration--and the presence of a reproducible biological entity. It has been shown repeatedly that these same histologic features may be observed at least focally in a diversity of neoplasms, including "true" hemangiopericytomas, synovial sarcomas, mesenchymal chondrosarcomas, infantile fibrosarcomas, malignant fibrous histiocytomas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, leiomyosarcomas, endometrial stromal sarcomas, solitary fibrous tumors, myofibromas, malignant mesotheliomas, thymomas, sarcomatoid carcinomas, malignant melanomas, and "phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors." Despite their potential sharing of the microscopic attributes in question, such neoplasms have individualistic clinical features and can also be distinguished from one another by specialized pathologic analyses. HPC is "defined" in that context by reactivity for vimentin, with or without CD34 and CD57, but it lacks other immunodeterminants of epithelial, neural, and myogenous differentiation. Paradoxically, this phenotype is indeed associated with the presence of myogenous-type cytoplasmic filaments in ultrastructural evaluations of HPC. Other lesions that may resemble "true" HPC--but which possess dissimilar subcellular and clinical characteristics--include solitary fibrous tumors, hemangiopericytomalike tumors of the sinonasal tract, and "infantile (congenital) hemangiopericytomas." Such observations suggest that the hemangiopericytoma is both a pathologic entity and a morphological pattern, and they emphasize the utility of adjuvant pathologic studies in this diagnostic context.

We report a case of primary rhabdomyosarcoma of the ileum occurring in a 45-year-old man. The rhabdomyoblastic nature was immunohistochemically confirmed by positivity with anti-myoglobin and anti-striated actin antisera. We discuss the differential diagnosis with similar tumors. To our knowledge, ileal rhabdomyosarcomas have not been previously reported in adults.

Knowledge of the pathogenic mechanisms of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is certainly a priority for the scientific community. Two main elements are involved in the biology of the most severe forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): the direct cytopathic effect of the virus against the host tissues, and a dysfunction of the immune system, characterized by the exhaustion of T lymphocytes. The exhaustion of T cells in COVID-19 is poorly understand, but some data could suggest a possible role of PD-1/PD-L1 axis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible role of PD-L1 expression in the pulmonary tissue in subjects affected by COVID-19. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the pulmonary tissue, and its exact location, was indagated by in situ hybridization; the expression of PD-L1 and CD8 in the same tissue was indagated by immunohistochemistry. Overall, PD-L1 resulted diffusely expressed in 70% of the cases, and an intense expression was observed in 43.5% of cases. Diffuse and intense presence of SARS-CoV-2 by in situ hybridization significantly correlated with an intense PD-L1 expression, and with expression of PD-L1 by pneumocytes. PD-L1 is overexpressed in the pulmonary tissue of subjects died from COVID-19, and mainly in subjects with a high viral load. These data suggest a possible role of PD-L1 in the immune system exhaustion at the basis of the severe forms of the disease.

Aims: Patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) carrying activating mutations of the KRAS gene do not benefit from treatment with anti-EGF receptor monoclonal antibodies. Therefore, KRAS mutation testing of mCRC patients is mandatory in the clinical setting to aid in the choice of appropriate therapy. Materials & methods: We developed a cost-effective approach for the determination of KRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13 in clinical practice based on a sensitive PCR/sequencing technique and the commercially available real-time PCR-based Therascreen® kit (DxS Ltd). Results & conclusion: The PCR/sequencing test was able to detect 10% mutant DNA in a background of wild-type DNA. By using this assay, we determined the mutational status of KRAS in 527 out of 540 (97.6%) formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues from mCRC patients. PCR/sequencing was not conclusive in 13 cases, in which low-intensity peaks suggestive of potential mutations were identified. The DxS assay, which showed a sensitivity of 1%, identified mutations in 11 out of 13 inconclusive cases. Interestingly, five of these 11 cases showed high levels of DNA fragmentation. No significant difference was found in the ability of PCR/sequencing and DxS to identify KRAS mutations within 160 cases with more than 30% tumor cells. However, in 24 samples with less than 30% tumor cells, DxS showed an higher sensitivity. In conclusion, our findings suggest that PCR/sequencing can be used for mutational analysis of the majority of tumor samples that have more than 30% tumor cell content, whereas more sensitive and expensive tests should be reserved for inconclusive cases and for samples with a low amount of tumor cells.

Post-mortem examination plays a pivotal role in understanding the pathobiology of the SARS-CoV-2; thus, the optimization of virus detection on the post-mortem formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is needed. Different techniques are available for the identification of the SARS-CoV-2, including reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization (ISH), and electron microscopy. The main goal of this study is to compare ISH versus RT-PCR to detect SARS-CoV-2 on post-mortem lung samples of positive deceased subjects. A total of 27 samples were analyzed by RT-PCR targeting different viral RNA sequences of SARS-CoV-2, including envelope (E), nucleocapsid (N), spike (S), and open reading frame (ORF1ab) genes and ISH targeting S and Orf1ab. All 27 cases showed the N gene amplification, 22 out of 27 the E gene amplification, 26 out of 27 the S gene amplification, and only 6 the ORF1ab gene amplification. The S ISH was positive only in 12 out of 26 cases positive by RT-PCR. The S ISH positive cases with strong and diffuse staining showed a correlation with low values of the number of the amplification cycles by S RT-PCR suggesting that ISH is a sensitive assay mainly in cases carrying high levels of S RNA. In conclusion, our findings demonstrated that ISH assay has lower sensitivity to detect SARS-CoV-2 in FFPE compared to RT-PCR; however, it is able to localize the virus in the cellular context since it preserves the morphology. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00428-021-03262-8.

Background: Almost 30% of the sunitinib-treated patients for metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC) do not receive a clinical benefit. Convincing evidences demonstrated a cross talk between the VEGF and CXCR4 pathways. It was hypothesized that CXCR4 expression in primary renal cancer could predict sunitinib responsiveness. Patients and Methods: In this exploratory study sixty-two mRCC patients receiving sunitinib as first-line treatment were evaluated for CXCR4 expression through immunohistochemistry (IHC). Correlations between CXCR4 expression, baseline patients and tumour characteristics were studied by contingency tables and the chi-square test. Univariable analysis was performed with the log-rank test, and the Cox model was applied for multivariable analysis. Results: The objective response rate of sunitinib first-line therapy was 35.5% (22/62) with a disease control rate (response and stable disease) of 62.9% (39/62). CXCR4 expression was absent/low in 30 (48.4%), moderate in 17 (27.4%), and high in 15 (24.2%) tumors respectively. Low or absent CXCR4 expression predicted response to sunitinib therapy. Moreover, Fuhrman grading and concomitant, CXCR4 and Fuhrman grading, strongly predicted sunitinib first line therapy responsiveness on progression-free survival and overall survival. Conclusions: High CXCR4 expression correlates with sunitinib poor response in metastatic renal cancer

An unknown primary tumor (UPT) is defined by the presence of a metastatic cancer without a known primary site of origin despite a standardized diagnostic workup. Clinically, UPTs show rapid progression and early dissemination, with signs and symptoms related to the metastatic site. The molecular bases of their biology remain largely unknown, with no evidence as to whether they represent a distinct biological entity. Immunohistochemistry remain the best diagnostic tool in term of cost-effectiveness, but the time-consuming "algorithmic process" it relies on has led to the application of new molecular techniques for the identification of the primary site of UPTs. For example, several microarray or miRNA classifications of UPTs have been used, with an accuracy in the prediction of the primary site as high as 90%. It should be noted that validating a prediction of tissue origin is challenging in these patients, since most of them will never have a primary site identified. Moreover, prospective studies to determine whether selection of treatment options based on such profiling methods actually improves patient outcome are still missing. In the last few years functional imaging (i.e. FDG-PET/CT) has gained a main role in the detection of the site of origin of UPTs and is currently recommended by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine. However, despite recent refinements in the diagnostic workup, the site of origin of UPT often remains elusive. As a consequence, treatment of patients with UPT is still empirical and inadequate.

Background: Evidence suggests that metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) has a high level of intratumor heterogeneity. We carried out a quantitative assessment of tumor heterogeneity for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations, in order to assess potential clinical implications. Patients and methods: Tumor samples (n = 182) from the CAPRI-GOIM trial of first-line cetuximab + FOLFIRI in KRAS exon-2 wild-type mCRC patients were assessed by next-generation sequencing that allows quantitative assessment of mutant genes. Mutant allelic frequency was normalized for the neoplastic cell content and, assuming that somatic mutations usually affect one allele, the Heterogeneity Score (HS) was calculated by multiplying by 2 the frequency of mutant alleles in neoplastic cells. Therefore, HS virtually corresponds to the fraction of neoplastic cells carrying a specific mutation. Results: The KRAS HS ranged between 12 and 260 with mean value of 87.1 and median value of 84.4, suggesting that in most CRC, the majority of neoplastic cells carry mutant KRAS. Similar findings were observed for NRAS (HS range 35.5-146.7; mean 102.8; median 117.1). In contrast, in BRAF (HS range 17.1-120; mean 54.8; median 54.3) and PIK3CA (HS range 14.3-120; mean 59.5; median 47.3) mutant cases, only a fraction of neoplastic cells seem to carry the mutant allele. The response rate was 70% in KRAS mutant patients with an HS 33 patients (high KRAS; n = 35); median progression-free survival were 7.97 and 8.37 months, respectively. Low-KRAS tumors had a higher frequency of additional mutations in PIK3CA when compared with high-KRAS (6/10 versus 8/35). Conclusions: KRAS and NRAS mutations are usually present in the majority of neoplastic cells, whereas BRAF and PIK3CA mutations often affect a limited fraction of transformed cells. Resistance to cetuximab in low-KRAS patients might be driven by the complex mutational profile rather than KRAS mutation load.

Purpose The prevalence of BRAF, NRAS, and p16CDKN2A mutations during melanoma progression remains inconclusive. We investigated the prevalence and distribution of mutations in these genes in different melanoma tissues. Patients and Methods In all, 291 tumor tissues from 132 patients with melanoma were screened. Paired samples of primary melanomas (n = 102) and synchronous or asynchronous metastases from the same patients (n = 165) were included. Tissue samples underwent mutation analysis (automated DNA sequencing). Secondary lesions included lymph nodes (n = 84), and skin (n = 36), visceral (n = 25), and brain (n = 44) sites. Results BRAF/NRAS mutations were identified in 58% of primary melanomas (43% BRAF; 15% NRAS); 62% in lymph nodes, 61% subcutaneous, 56% visceral, and 70% in brain sites. Mutations were observed in 63% of metastases (48% BRAF; 15% NRAS), a nonsignificant increase in mutation frequency after progression from primary melanoma. Of the paired samples, lymph nodes (93% consistency) and visceral metastases (96% consistency) presented a highly similar distribution of BRAF/NRAS mutations versus primary melanomas, with a significantly less consistent pattern in brain (80%) and skin metastases (75%). This suggests that independent subclones are generated in some patients. p16CDKN2A mutations were identified in 7% and 14% of primary melanomas and metastases, with a low consistency (31%) between secondary and primary tumor samples. Conclusion In the era of targeted therapies, assessment of the spectrum and distribution of alterations in molecular targets among patients with melanoma is needed. Our findings about the prevalence of BRAF/NRAS/p16CDKN2A mutations in paired tumor lesions from patients with melanoma may be useful in the management of this disease.

BackgroundMonoclonal antibodies directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have been approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) that do not carry KRAS mutations. Therefore, KRAS testing has become mandatory to chose the most appropriate therapy for these patients.Methodology/principal findingsIn order to guarantee the possibility for mCRC patients to receive an high quality KRAS testing in every Italian region, the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) and the Italian Society of Pathology and Cytopathology -Italian division of the International Academy of Pathology (SIAPEC-IAP) started a program to improve KRAS testing. AIOM and SIAPEC identified a large panel of Italian medical oncologists, pathologists and molecular biologists that outlined guidelines for KRAS testing in mCRC patients. These guidelines include specific information on the target patient population, the biological material for molecular analysis, the extraction of DNA, and the methods for the mutational analysis that are summarized in this paper. Following the publication of the guidelines, the scientific societies started an external quality assessment scheme for KRAS testing. Five CRC specimens with known KRAS mutation status were sent to the 59 centers that participated to the program. The samples were validated by three referral laboratories. The participating laboratories were allowed to use their own preferred method for DNA extraction and mutational analysis and were asked to report the results within 4 weeks. The limit to pass the quality assessment was set at 100% of true responses. In the first round, only two centers did not pass (3%). The two centers were offered to participate to a second round and both centers failed again to pass.ConclusionsThe results of this first Italian quality assessment for KRAS testing suggest that KRAS mutational analysis is performed with good quality in the majority of Italian centers.

Background: We tested the relevance of clinical information in the histopathologic evaluation of melanocytic skin neoplasm (MSN). Methods: Histopathologic specimens from 99 clinically atypical MSN were circulated among ten histopathologists; each case had clinical information available in a database with a five-step procedure (no information; age/sex/location; clinical diagnosis; clinical image; dermoscopic image); each step had a histopathologic diagnosis (D1 through D5); each diagnostic step had a level of diagnostic confidence (LDC) ranging from 1 (no diagnostic certainty) to 5 (absolute diagnostic certainty). The comparison of the LDC was employed with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures. Findings: In D1 (no information), 36/99 cases (36.3%) had unanimous diagnosis; in D5 (full information available), 51/99 cases (51.5%) had unanimous diagnosis (p for difference between proportions

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), as a screening test, in moderately- (G2) or poorly- (G3) differentiated breast cancers of the ductal (IDC) and lobular (ILC) histotypes and distant metastases. HER2 FISH was performed on 486 G2 and 477 G3 both of IDC and ILC histotypes and in 241 metastases. A significant difference in the HER2 amplification was observed between G2 (14.8%) and G3 (31.9%), with no difference according to the histotype. However, the rate of amplification increased to 36% in the G2/hormone receptor-negative cases as compared to 10.6% in the G2/receptor-positive cases (p

We investigated 27 pleomorphic carcinomas of the lung for exon 1 K-ras gene mutations using polymerase chain reaction-single-strand conformation polymophism analysis and direct sequencing. All pleomorphic carcinomas were biphasic, that is, composed of an adeno-, squamous- or large-cell-carcinomatous component associated with a spindle- and/or giant-cell component. Of 27 cases, six (22%) showed K-ras codon 12 mutations, which is a figure higher than that previously reported on in pure sarcoma-like pleomorphic carcinomas. Five tumors displayed the same mutation in both the epithelial and the sarcomatoid components, whereas in one tumor the mutation was restricted to the epithelial component. All mutations occurred in smokers, and were transversions, including GGT (glycine) to TGT (cysteine) change in two cases, to GCT (alanine) in two and to GTT (valine) in two. No significant relationships were found between the occurrence and type of mutations and patients' survival or any other clinicopathological variable, suggesting that K-ras mutations are early events in the development of these tumors. Our results indicate that most, though not all, biphasic pleomorphic carcinomas of the lung are monoclonal in origin, and that cigarette smoking may have a causative role in the development of K-ras alterations in these tumors, as all mutations are transversions.