Search

Objectives: Maternal sickle cell disease (SCD) and multiple gestations are well known separately as causes of high-risk pregnancies, however, there is sparse information available on maternal and perinatal outcome when both conditions occur together. This case series describes the outcomes of women with maternal SCD and twin pregnancy in the largest single-center case series to date. Methods: Retrospective identification of all twin pregnancies in maternal SCD patients between 2006 and 2016 at Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, United Kingdom Results: Eight women were included: seven with HbSS and one with HbSC. Our cohort experienced common SCD-related and pregnancy-related complications such as painful vaso-occlusive crises (VOC), acute chest syndrome (ACS), and pre-eclampsia and less common complications such as peri-partum cardiomyopathy and delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction. Only two out of eight women had relatively uncomplicated pregnancies. Seven out of eight women required transfusion antenatally and there was no maternal or perinatal mortality. A review of the available literature highlighted the lack of available information on this uncommon cohort. It was evident that outcomes have improved over the years, where historical studies demonstrate higher rates of maternal and perinatal mortality. Discussion: The antenatal and postnatal complications described in our study and literature review highlights the significant morbidity and mortality associated with these high-risk pregnancies. Conclusion: Our case series highlights the advantage of closer monitoring and comprehensive multidisciplinary care in delivering improved clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Seizures during labor are reported in 3.5% of women with epilepsy (WWE) and can result in both maternal and fetal morbidity. In response to an anecdotal increase in WWE developing seizures in labor or peripartum (up to 24 h post-partum), a review of patients managed in our service was undertaken to define the incidence of peripartum seizures and determine learning points., Methods: A retrospective review of all cases of WWE having peripartum seizures from 2017 to 2022 in our institution was undertaken. Each case was reviewed by the multidisciplinary team (MDT) and common themes identified., Results: In total, 106 WWE received pregnancy care in the study period, of whom 8/106 (7.5%) had a seizure in the peripartum period. The MDT-agreed learning points included importance of pre-pregnancy counseling, prompt up-titration of antiepileptic drugs where indicated and recommendations for the management in the peripartum period., Significance: We concluded that the peripartum period remains a high-risk time for seizures in WWE. There is little evidence to support guidelines for the management of WWE in the peripartum period. In the absence of this evidence, sharing experience may help those managing such women to improve care and reduce risk during this vulnerable time., (© 2024 International League Against Epilepsy.)

Introduction: Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) in monochorionic twin pregnancy, defined as an estimated fetal weight (EFW) of one twin <10th centile and EFW discordance ≥25%, is associated with stillbirth and neurodisability for both twins. The condition poses unique management difficulties: on the one hand, continuation of the pregnancy carries a risk of death of the smaller twin, with a high risk of co-twin demise (40%) or co-twin neurological sequelae (30%). On the other, early delivery to prevent the death of the smaller twin may expose the larger twin to prematurity, with the associated risks of long-term physical, emotional and financial costs from neurodisability, such as cerebral palsy.When there is severe and early sFGR, before viability, delivery is not an option. In this scenario, there are currently three main management options: (1) expectant management, (2) selective termination of the smaller twin and (3) placental laser photocoagulation of interconnecting vessels. These management options have never been investigated in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). The best management option is unknown, and there are many challenges for a potential RCT. These include the rarity of the condition resulting in a small number of eligible pregnancies, uncertainty about whether pregnant women will agree to participate in such a trial and whether they will agree to be randomised to expectant management or active fetal intervention, and the challenges of robust and long-term outcome measures. Therefore, the main objective of the FERN study is to assess the feasibility of conducting an RCT of active intervention vs expectant management in monochorionic twin pregnancies with early-onset (prior to 24 weeks) sFGR., Methods and Analysis: The FERN study is a prospective mixed-methods feasibility study. The primary objective is to recommend whether an RCT of intervention vs expectant management of sFGR in monochorionic twin pregnancy is feasible by exploring women's preference, clinician's preference, current practice and equipoise and numbers of cases. To achieve this, we propose three distinct work packages (WPs). WP1: A Prospective UK Multicentre Study, WP2A: a Qualitative Study Exploring Parents' and Clinicians' Views and WP3: a Consensus Development to Determine Feasibility of a Trial. Eligible pregnancies will be recruited to WP1 and WP2, which will run concurrently. The results of these two WPs will be used in WP3 to develop consensus on a future definitive study. The duration of the study will be 53 months, composed of 10 months of setup, 39 months of recruitment, 42 months of data collection, and 5 months of data analysis, report writing and recommendations. The pragmatic sample size for WP1 is 100 monochorionic twin pregnancies with sFGR. For WP2, interviews will be conducted until data saturation and sample variance are achieved, that is, when no new major themes are being discovered. Based on previous similar pilot studies, this is anticipated to be approximately 15-25 interviews in both the parent and clinician groups. Engagement of at least 50 UK clinicians is planned for WP3., Ethics and Dissemination: This study has received ethical approval from the Health Research Authority (HRA) South West-Cornwall and Plymouth Ethics Committee (REC reference 20/SW/0156, IRAS ID 286337). All participating sites will undergo site-specific approvals for assessment of capacity and capability by the HRA. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. The results from the FERN project will be used to inform future studies., Trial Registration Number: This study is included in the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN16879394) and the NIHR Central Portfolio Management System (CPMS), CRN: Reproductive Health and Childbirth Specialty (UKCRN reference 47201)., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To identify current practices in the management of selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies., Design: Cross-sectional survey., Setting: International., Population: Clinicians involved in the management of MCDA twin pregnancies with sFGR., Methods: A structured, self-administered survey., Main Outcome Measures: Clinical practices and attitudes to diagnostic criteria and management strategies., Results: Overall, 62.8% (113/180) of clinicians completed the survey; of which, 66.4% (75/113) of the respondents reported that they would use an estimated fetal weight (EFW) of <10th centile for the smaller twin and an inter-twin EFW discordance of >25% for the diagnosis of sFGR. For early-onset type I sFGR, 79.8% (75/94) of respondents expressed that expectant management would be their routine practice. On the other hand, for early-onset type II and type III sFGR, 19.3% (17/88) and 35.7% (30/84) of respondents would manage these pregnancies expectantly, whereas 71.6% (63/88) and 57.1% (48/84) would refer these pregnancies to a fetal intervention centre or would offer fetal intervention for type II and type III cases, respectively. Moreover, 39.0% (16/41) of the respondents would consider fetoscopic laser surgery (FLS) for early-onset type I sFGR, whereas 41.5% (17/41) would offer either FLS or selective feticide, and 12.2% (5/41) would exclusively offer selective feticide. For early-onset type II and type III sFGR cases, 25.9% (21/81) and 31.4% (22/70) would exclusively offer FLS, respectively, whereas 33.3% (27/81) and 32.9% (23/70) would exclusively offer selective feticide., Conclusions: There is significant variation in clinician practices and attitudes towards the management of early-onset sFGR in MCDA twin pregnancies, especially for type II and type III cases, highlighting the need for high-level evidence to guide management., (© 2024 The Author(s). BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is frequently diagnosed in people of reproductive age, many of whom will become pregnant following diagnosis. Although many women report an improvement in symptoms and relapses during pregnancy, symptoms such as fatigue and spasticity are commonly reported and can worsen. Prescribing medications during pregnancy and breastfeeding presents unique challenges and guidance on the use of symptomatic therapies is limited., Objectives: This paper aims to provide a consensus on the current evidence base to facilitate informed decision-making and optimise pre-conception counselling., Methods: A list of most commonly prescribed medications for symptom management in MS was created using pregnancy and MS-related READ codes in the Welsh GP Dataset, followed by a review by MS neurologists., Results: A final list of 24 medications was generated for review. Searches were performed on each medication, and evidence graded using standardised criteria. Evidence-based recommendations were developed and distributed to experts in the field and revised according to feedback using modified Delphi criteria., Conclusions: Our guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations on the safety of symptomatic therapies during pregnancy and breastfeeding for general practitioners and specialist teams working with people with MS who are hoping to embark on pregnancy or are currently pregnant. Individual risk-benefit ratios should be considered during pre-conception counselling to optimise symptom burden and minimise harm to both parent and child.