Search

Background: Pain control in trauma is an integral part of treatment in combat casualty care. More soldiers injured on the battlefield need analgesics for pain than life-saving interventions (LSIs). Early treatment of pain improves outcomes after injury, while inadequate treatment leads to higher rates of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)., Objectives: To describe the experience of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) Medical Corps with prehospital use of analgesia., Methods: All cases documented in the IDF-Trauma Registry between January 1997 and December 2019 were examined. Data collection included analgesia administered, mechanism of injury, wound distribution, and life-saving interventions performed., Results: Of 16,117 patients, 1807 (11.2%) had at least one documented analgesia. Demographics included 91.2% male; median age 21 years. Leading mechanism of injury was penetrating (52.9%). Of injured body regions reported, 46.2% were lower extremity wounds. Most common types of analgesics were morphine (57.2%) and fentanyl (27%). Over the two decades of the study period, types of analgesics given by providers at point of injury (POI) had changed. Fentanyl was introduced in 2013, and by 2019 was given to 39% of patients. Another change was an increase of casualties receiving analgesia from 5-10% until 2010 to 34% by 2019. A total of 824 LSIs were performed on 556 patients (30.8%) receiving analgesia and no adverse events were found in any of the casualties., Conclusions: Most casualties at POI did not receive any analgesics. The most common analgesics administered were opioids. Over time analgesic administration has gained acceptance and become more commonplace on the battlefield.

Background: Warfarin has a narrow therapeutic index with INR values between 2.0 - 3.0. According to our clinical experience, control of INR levels during hospitalization is poor., Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate control of INR levels during hospitalization in the departments of internal medicine, to determine the factors that influence INR levels during hospitalization, and the association between the control of INR levels before and during hospitalization., Methods: This is a retrospective study, including the data of patients who were admitted to the internal medicine wards at Meir and Rabin Medical Centers, Israel, between May 2011 and May 2013. Inclusion criteria: patients who were treated with warfarin prior and during the index hospitalization and at least 3 INR tests were taken during the hospitalization and the 3 months before it. The collected data included: demographic parameters (age, gender), medical background, cause of admission, relevant medications for INR control, duration of hospitalization and INR values. The INR control during hospitalization and the previous 3 months, the parameters that affect INR levels and the association between control before and during hospitalization were evaluated., Results: Of 1861 screened patients, only 299 filled the inclusion criteria. Among those patients, 93 (31%) were considered to have well controlled INR rates during the hospitalization. No significant differences were found between the controlled and uncontrolled groups. The risk of a well-controlled patient before admission to be uncontrolled during admission was 63%, whereas the risk of an uncontrolled patient before admission to remain uncontrolled during hospitalization was 73%., Conclusions: By using a larger study group it might be possible to achieve significant results and to set guidelines for INR control during admission., Discussion: Most patients are not monitored well enough to estimate their degree of INR control. Most of the patients, who could be evaluated, were uncontrolled.

Background: Pain control in trauma is an integral part of treatment in combat casualty care (CCC). More soldiers injured on the battlefield will need analgesics for pain than those who will need lifesaving interventions (LSI). It has been shown that early treatment of pain improves outcomes after traumatic injury, whereas inadequate treatment leads to higher rates of PTSD. The purpose of this article is to report the Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps (IDF-MC) experience with point of injury (POI) use of analgesia., Methods: All cases documented in the IDF Trauma Registry (ITR) between January 1997 and December 2014 were examined. All cases of POI pain medications were extracted. Data collection included mechanism of injury, wound distribution, pain medication administered, mortality, and provider type., Results: Of 8,576 patients, 1,056 (12.3%) patients who had at least one documented pain management treatment were included in this study. Demographics of the study population included 94.2% men and 5.8% women with a median age of 21 years. Injury mechanisms included 40.3% blast injuries (n = 426) and 29% gunshot injuries (306). Of 1,513 injured body regions reported, 52% (787) were extremity wounds (upper and lower), 23% (353) were truncal wounds, and 17.7% (268) were head and neck injuries. A total of 1,469 episodes of analgesic treatment were reported. The most common types of analgesics were morphine (74.7%, 1,097 episodes), ketamine (9.6%, 141 episodes), and fentanyl (13.6%, 200 episodes). Of the patients, 39% (413) received more than one type of analgesic. In 90.5% of cases, analgesia was administered by a physician or a paramedic. Over the span of the study period (1997-2014), types of analgesics given by providers at POI had changed, as fentanyl was introduced to providers. A total of 801 LSIs were performed on 379 (35.9%) patients receiving analgesia, and no adverse events were found in any of the casualties., Conclusion: Most casualties at POI did not receive any analgesics while on the battlefield. The most common analgesics administered at POI were opioids and the most common route of administration was intravenously. This study provides evidence that over time analgesic administration has gained acceptance and has been more common place on the battlefield. Increasingly, more casualties are receiving pain management treatment early in CCC along with LSIs. We hope that this shift will impact CCC by reducing PTSD and overall morbidity resulting from inadequate management of acute pain.

Background: Four-dimensional parathyroid computed tomography (4DCT) is a relatively new parathyroid imaging technique that provides functional and highly detailed anatomic information about parathyroid tumors., Objectives: To assess the accuracy of 4DCT for the preoperative localization of parathyroid adenomas (PTAs) in patients with biochemically confirmed primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and a history of failed surgery or unsuccessful localization using 99mTc-sestamibi scanning and ultrasonography., Methods: Between January 2013 and January 2015, 55 patients with PHPT underwent 4DCT at Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel. An initial unenhanced scan was followed by an IV contrast injection of nonionic contrast material (120 ml of at 4 ml/s). Scanning was repeated 25, 60, and 90 seconds after the initiation of IV contrast administration. An experienced radiologist blinded to the earlier imaging results reviewed the 4DCT for the presence and location (quadrant) of the suspected PTAs. At the time of the study, 28 patients had undergone surgical exploration following 4DCT and we compared their scans with the surgical findings., Results: 4DCT accurately localized 96% (27/28) of abnormal glands, all of which were hypervascular and showed characteristic rapid enhancement on 4DCT that could be distinguished from Level II lymph nodes. Surgery found hypovascular cystic PTA in one patient who produced a negative 4DCT scan. All patients had solitary PTAs. The scan at 90 seconds provided no additional information and was abandoned during the study., Conclusions: 4DCT accurately localized hypervascular parathyroid lesions and distinguished them from other tissues. A three-phase scanning protocol may suffice.