Search

We consider guarded negation transitive closure logic (GNTC). In this paper, we show that the satisfiability problem for GNTC is in 2-EXPTIME (hence, 2-EXPTIME-complete from existing lower bound results), which improves the previously known non-elementary time upper bound. This extends previously known 2-EXPTIME upper bound results, e.g., for the guarded negation fragment of first-order logic, the unary negation fragment of first-order logic with regular path expressions, propositional dynamic logic (PDL) with intersection and converse, and CPDL+ (an extension of PDL with conjunctive queries) of bounded treewidth. To this end, we present a sound and complete local model checker on tree decompositions. This system has a closure property of size single exponential, and it induces a reduction from the satisfiability problem for GNTC into the non-emptiness problem for 2-way (weak) alternating parity tree automata in single exponential time. Additionally, we investigate the complexity of satisfiability and model checking for fragments of GNTC, such as guarded (quantification) fragments, unary negation fragments, and existential positive fragments.

We investigate the equational theory for Kleene algebra terms with variable complements and constant complements -- (language) complement where it applies only to variables or constants -- w.r.t. languages. While the equational theory w.r.t. languages coincides with the language equivalence (under the standard language valuation) for Kleene algebra terms, this coincidence is broken if we extend the terms with complements. In this paper, we prove the decidability of some fragments of the equational theory: the universality problem is coNP-complete, and the inequational theory $t \le s$ is coNP-complete when $t$ does not contain Kleene-star. To this end, we introduce words-to-letters valuations; they are sufficient valuations for the equational theory and ease us in investigating the equational theory w.r.t. languages. Additionally, we show a completeness theorem of the equational theory for words with variable complements and the non-empty constant., Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2309.02760

We prove that the equational theory of the positive calculus of relations with transitive closure (PCoR*) is EXPSPACE-complete. PCoR* terms consist of the following standard operators on binary relations: identity, empty, universality, union, intersection, composition, converse, and reflexive-transitive closure (so, PCoR* terms subsume Kleene algebra terms and allegory terms as fragments). Additionally, we show that the equational theory of PCoR* extended with tests and nominals (in hybrid logic) is still EXPSPACE-complete; moreover, it is PSPACE-complete for its intersection-free fragment.

In this note, we give a linear-size translation from formulas of first-order logic into equations of the calculus of relations preserving validity and finite validity. Our translation also gives a linear-size conservative reduction from formulas of first-order logic into formulas of the three-variable fragment of first-order logic.

We investigate the equational theory of Kleene algebra terms with variable complements -- (language) complement where it applies only to variables -- w.r.t. languages. While the equational theory w.r.t. languages coincides with the language equivalence (under the standard language valuation) for Kleene algebra terms, this coincidence is broken if we extend the terms with complements. In this paper, we prove the decidability of some fragments of the equational theory: the universality problem is coNP-complete, and the inequational theory t <= s is coNP-complete when t does not contain Kleene-star. To this end, we introduce words-to-letters valuations; they are sufficient valuations for the equational theory and ease us in investigating the equational theory w.r.t. languages. Additionally, we prove that for words with variable complements, the equational theory coincides with the word equivalence., Comment: In Proceedings AFL 2023, arXiv:2309.01126

We introduce the $k$-variable-occurrence fragment, which is the set of terms having at most $k$ occurrences of variables. We give a sufficient condition for the decidability of the equational theory of the $k$-variable-occurrence fragment using the finiteness of a monoid. As a case study, we prove that for Tarski's calculus of relations with bounded dot-dagger alternation (an analogy of quantifier alternation in first-order logic), the equational theory of the $k$-variable-occurrence fragment is decidable for each $k$.

We study the decidability and complexity of equational theories of the existential calculus of relations with transitive closure (ECoR*) and its fragments, where ECoR* is the positive calculus of relations with transitive closure extended with complements of term variables and constants. We give characterizations of these equational theories by using edge saturations and we show that the equational theory is 1) coNP-complete for ECoR* without transitive closure; 2) in coNEXP for ECoR* without intersection and PSPACE-complete for two smaller fragments; 3) $\Pi_{1}^{0}$-complete for ECoR*. The second result gives PSPACE-upper bounds for some extensions of Kleene algebra, including Kleene algebra with top w.r.t. binary relations.

We introduce p-equivalence by asymptotic probabilities, which is a weak almost-equivalence based on zero-one laws in finite model theory. In this paper, we consider the computational complexities of p-equivalence problems for regular languages and provide the following details. First, we give an robustness of p-equivalence and a logical characterization for p-equivalence. The characterization is useful to generate some algorithms for p-equivalence problems by coupling with standard results from descriptive complexity. Second, we give the computational complexities for the p-equivalence problems by the logical characterization. The computational complexities are the same as for the (fully) equivalence problems. Finally, we apply the proofs for p-equivalence to some generalized equivalences., Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2016, arXiv:1609.03648