1. Perceptions of pre-hospital emergency personnel regarding trauma patient care.
- Author
-
Razmjoee N, Mohebbi Z, Kalyani MN, and Keshtkaran Z
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Middle Aged, Emergency Medical Technicians psychology, Perception, Patient Care, Emergency Medical Services, Qualitative Research, Wounds and Injuries therapy, Wounds and Injuries psychology
- Abstract
Background: Providing care to trauma patients in pre-hospital emergencies is a vital and life-sustaining factor for individuals. This study was conducted to percept of pre-hospital emergency personnel regarding trauma patient care., Methods: This qualitative study was done using a conventional content analysis method that employed purposive sampling technique. A total of 12 in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 operational staff members of pre-hospital emergency services from May 2021 to September 2022. After recording and transcribing the data, qualitative content analysis, based on Graneheim and Lundman's approach, was performed on the data., Results: From the data analysis, a total of 478 initial codes were extracted, leading to the identification of two main categories, namely "Stress as an Unavoidable Factor" and "Emotional Impasse". The first category included three sub-categories of work under stress, associating your family in the face of life-threatening conditions, and worrying about the patient's fate. Three sub-categories of a long-term mental occupation of the technician with the encounter scene, the feeling of guilt despite trying as much as possible, and emotional distress in certain groups emerged from the second category., Conclusions: "Stress as an Unavoidable Factor" and "Emotional Impasse" have been introduced as main categories of perceptions of pre-hospital emergency personnel regarding trauma patient care., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This research is associated with the ethics code IR.SUMS.NUMIMG.REC.1400.039 from Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in Iran. After receiving approval from the university’s ethics committee and coordinating the necessary permissions, the researcher visited the research settings. They introduced themselves and outlined the criteria for participation to the emergency operational staff. Once participants agreed to take part voluntarily, they were contacted to arrange meetings. Participants retained full autonomy to withdraw from the study at any time. Prior to data collection, written informed consent was secured from each participant, ensuring their confidentiality, anonymity, and the security of their data. Participants were also asked to provide written consent for recording the interviews, as this was considered essential for maintaining accuracy in the content. The scheduling and location of the interviews were tailored to the participants’ preferences and convenience, taking place outside their work shifts. The length of each interview was flexible, depending on the comfort of the participants. The researcher provided participants with their email and phone number for further communication. Consent for publication: All participants read and signed the informed consent form. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF