Search

Background: Immune-combinations have recently become the standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This study evaluated the applicability of the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk model in predicting outcomes for patients treated with either immune-oncologic drug doublet (IO-IO) or immune-oncologic drug tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations (IO-TKI). A secondary objective to compare the effectiveness of IO-IO versus IO-TKI within the IMDC risk groups over a short follow-up period. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 172 patients with mRCC treated with first-line immunotherapy combinations. Progression free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure 2 (TTF2), and overall survival (OS) were compared between IMDC risk categories. Model fit was assessed using the c-index. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to adjust and compare outcomes between IO-IO and IO-TKI, except for IMDC favorable risk patients due to the small number of IO-IO cases. Results: The IMDC risk model demonstrated a c-index of 0.684 (OS) for entire cohort, 0.600 (PFS), 0.596 (TTF2), and 0.624 (OS) for IO-IO, and 0.667 (PFS), 0.702 (TTF2), and 0.751 (OS) for IO-TKI. In the IMDC intermediate and poor risk groups after IPTW adjustment, PFS (HR 0.72), TTF2 (HR 0.67), and OS (HR 0.74) did not significantly differ between IO-IO and IO-TKI. Specifically, in the IMDC intermediate risk group, PFS (HR 0.79), TTF2 (HR 0.69), and OS (HR 0.65) were longer in IO-TKI, though the differences were not statistically significant. In the IMDC poor risk group, PFS (HR 0.76), TTF2 (HR 0.77), and OS (HR 1.03) were comparable. Conclusions: The impact of IMDC risk model on survival was modest in IO-IO, while remained statistically substantial in IO-TKI. Survival outcomes did not significantly differ between IO-IO and IO-TKI during the short follow-up period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Methods Results Conclusions Urinary continence after radical prostatectomy is a crucial aspect of patient quality of life. The aim of this study was to identify the factors influencing urinary continence after robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, focusing on the role of anterior reconstruction.We collected clinical data from 375 patients at a single institution. Logistic regression analyses for urinary continence rate at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were performed on the entire patient population to determine the influencing factors. Anterior and posterior reconstruction was performed until August 2017, transitioning to posterior reconstruction only. The impact of anterior reconstruction on postoperative urinary continence was evaluated using logistic regression model adjusted by inverse‐probability treatment weighting in nerve‐sparing and non‐nerve‐sparing subgroups, respectively.For the entire cohort, the urinary continence rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 34.7%, 57.6%, 73.1%, and 83.5%, respectively. Anterior reconstruction significantly influenced early urinary continence recovery, and membrane urethral length correlated with continence rates at all postoperative time points. After adjustment using the IPTW method, the chronological trend of urinary continence recovery rate in relation to anterior reconstruction was similar between patients with and without nerve sparing.Anterior reconstruction contributes to early recovery from urinary incontinence after robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. However, the impact for continence rate 12 months after surgery is limited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitors and enfortumab vedotin have opened new avenues for sequential treatment strategies for locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). In the pre‐enfortumab vedotin era, many patients could not receive third‐line treatment owing to rapid disease progression and poor general status. This study aimed to analyze real‐world sequential treatment practices for la/mUC in Japan, with a focus on patients who do not receive third‐line treatment. Methods: We analyzed data for 1023 la/mUC patients diagnosed between January 2020 and December 2021 at 54 institutions from a Japanese nationwide cohort. Results: At the median follow‐up of 28.5 months, the median overall survival from first‐line initiation for 905 patients who received systemic anticancer treatment was 19.1 months. Among them, 81% and 32% received second‐ and third‐line treatment. Notably, 52% had their treatment terminated before the opportunity for third‐line treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that low performance status (≥1), elevated neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (≥3), and low body mass index (<21 kg/m2) at the start of first‐line treatment were independent risk factors for not proceeding to third‐line treatment (p = 0.0024, 0.0069, and 0.0058, respectively). In this cohort, 33% had one of these factors, 36% had two, and 15% had all three. Conclusions: This study highlights the high frequency of factors associated with poor tolerance to anticancer treatment in la/mUC patients. The findings suggest the need to establish optimal sequential treatment strategies, maximizing efficacy within time and tolerance constraints, while concurrently providing strong supportive care, considering immunological and nutritional aspects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of pharmacotherapy for metastatic non‐clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) in Japanese population. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we compared the time to treatment failure (TTF) for molecular‐targeted agents as first‐line therapy, or nivolumab therapy as sequential therapy between ccRCC and nccRCC using the data of Japanese metastatic RCC patients registered in the Michinoku Japan Urological Cancer Study Group database. Results: In total, 511 cases of ccRCC and 77 cases of nccRCC were treated with pharmacotherapy. After excluding the patients who received cytokine therapy, chemotherapy, or others, there were 391 ccRCC patients and 60 nccRCC patients who were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and 7 ccRCC patients and 7 nccRCC patients who were treated with mammalian‐target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORIs). In addition, 132 ccRCC patients and 16 nccRCC patients received nivolumab. There was no significant difference in IMDC risk classification before first‐line therapy between ccRCC and nccRCC groups, or in each subgroup within the nccRCC group. TTF for TKIs (161 days, 95% CI: 75‐212 days) and mTORIs (21 days, 95% CI: 9‐31 days) didn't differ significantly between nccRCC and ccRCC groups (205 days, 95% CI: 174‐243 days and 33 days, 95% CI: 8‐113 days, respectively). TTF for TKIs was significantly longer than that for mTORIs in nccRCC group (p<0.01). There was no significant difference in TTF between the different TKIs in nccRCC group. In addition, no significant difference in TTF for nivolumab was seen between ccRCC and nccRCC groups. Conclusions: The results showed that the efficacy of molecular‐targeted agents as first‐line therapy was similar oncological outcomes between metastatic nccRCC and ccRCC in Japanese patients. TKIs may be more effective than mTORIs in metastatic nccRCC patients. Nivolumab administration might also be as effective in nccRCC patients as in ccRCC patients in Japanese population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]