Search

Purpose: We sought to compare the costs of ambulatory endovascular aneurysm repair (a-EVAR) and inpatient EVAR (i-EVAR) at up to 1-year of follow-up. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing elective EVAR between April 2016 and December 2018 at two academic centers. Patients planned for a-EVAR were compared with i-EVAR. Costs at 30 days and 1 year were extracted. These included operating room (OR) use, bed occupancy, laboratory and imaging, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and reinterventions. Baseline characteristics were compared. Multiple regression model was used to identify predictors of increased EVAR costs. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare cost differences at 30 days and 1 year via an intention-to-treat analysis. Bonferroni post hoc test compared between-group differences. A p value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: One hundred seventy patients were included. Most underwent percutaneous EVAR (>94%) under spinal anesthesia (>84%). Ambulatory endovascular aneurysm repair was successful in 84% (84/100). Ambulatory endovascular aneurysm repair patients (76±8 years) were younger than i-EVAR (78±9 years). They also had a smaller mean aneurysm diameter (56±6 mm) compared with i-EVAR (59±6 mm). Emergency department visits, readmissions, and reinterventions were similar up to 1 year (all p=NS). Ambulatory endovascular aneurysm repair costs showed a non-statistically significant reduction in total costs at 30 days and 1 year by 27% and 21%, respectively. Patients younger than 85 years and males had a 30-day cost reduction by 34% (p=0.027) and 33% (p=0.035), respectively with a-EVAR. Conclusions: Same-day discharge is feasible and successful in selected patients. Patients younger than 85 years and males have a short-term cost benefit with EVAR done in the ambulatory setting without increased complications or reinterventions. Clinical Impact: This study shows the overall safety of ambulatory EVAR with proper patient selection. These patient had similar post-intervention complications to inpatients. Same day discharge also resulted in short-term reduction in costs in male patients and patients younger than 85 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the outcomes of endovascular treatment in patients with moderate and severe claudication due to femoropopliteal disease, that is, disease of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients with moderate and severe claudication (Rutherford 2 and 3) undergoing endovascular treatment for FP disease between January 2012 and December 2017 at two university-affiliated hospitals was performed. All procedures were performed by vascular surgeons. Primary outcomes were mortality, freedom from reintervention, major adverse limb events defined as major amputations, open surgical revascularization, or progression to chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) at 30 days, 1 year, 2 years, and last follow-up. Unadjusted odds ratios were calculated to identify variables associated with adverse outcomes, and Kaplan–Meier survival curves were used to determine mortality and freedom from reintervention. Results: Eighty-five limbs in 74 patients were identified on review. Mean age was 69.6 ± 9.8 years and 74.3% were males. At a median follow-up of 49.0 ± 25.5 months, all-cause mortality rate was 8.1% (6 patients) with 16.7% being due to cardiovascular causes. Reintervention rates were 1.2%, 16.5%, and 21.2% at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. Major adverse limb events occurred in 3 patients and rates were 0%, 1.2%, and 2.4% at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. Progression to CLTI was 0%, 1.2%, and 1.2% at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. Claudication had improved or resolved in 55.6% (n = 34 patients), stable in 38.9% (n = 21 patients), and worse in 5.6% (n = 3 patients) Age ≥ 70 years (OR = 4.09 (1.14–14.66), p = 0.027), TASCII A lesion (OR = 4.67 (1.14–19.17), p = 0.025), and presence of 3-vessel runoff (OR = 3.70 (1.18–11.59), p = 0.022) predicted symptoms' improvement. TASCII A lesions were less likely to require reintervention (OR = 0.23 (0.06–0.86), p = 0.020). Reintervention within 1 year (OR = 11.67 (0.98–138.94), p = 0.017), reintervention with a stent (OR = 14.40 (1.19–173.67), p = 0.008) and more than one reintervention (OR = 39.00 (2.89–526.28), p < 0.001) predicted major adverse limb events. Conclusions: Careful patient selection is important when planning endovascular treatment in patients with intermittent claudication and FP disease. This could result in symptomatic improvement in more than half of the patients. Adverse outcomes such as major adverse limb events, progression to CLTI, and amputations occur at low rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the present review, we assessed the effect of obesity on clinical outcomes for patients with peripheral arterial disease who had undergone endovascular or open lower extremity revascularization surgery. A systematic search strategy of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted. The included studies had compared obese and nonobese cohorts with peripheral arterial disease who had undergone endovascular or open lower extremity revascularization. The outcomes included mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, major adverse limb events, surgical site infections, endovascular access site complications, and perioperative complications. Eight studies were included with 171,648 patients. The obese patients (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) were more likely to be women, to have diabetes, and to have more cardiovascular comorbidities despite being younger. No association was found between obesity and peripheral arterial disease severity. Obesity was associated with an overall 22% decreased mortality risk after lower extremity revascularization (risk ratio [RR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.85; P <.001; I 2 = 0%; GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development, evaluation), very low quality). A subgroup analysis by intervention type showed similar findings (endovascular: RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71-0.87; P <.001; I 2 = 0%; open: RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.95; P =.024; I 2 = 43%). Obesity was associated with a 14% decreased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events for open surgery only (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.98; P =.021; I 2 = 0%; GRADE, very low quality). Obesity was associated with an increased risk of surgical site infections pooled across intervention types (RR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.34-2.14; P <.001; I 2 = 78%; GRADE, very low quality). No association was found between obesity and major adverse limb events (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.93-1.11; P =.73; I 2 = 15%; GRADE, very low quality) or endovascular access site complications (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.76-1.63; P =.58; I 2 = 86%; GRADE, very low quality). Pooled perioperative complications did not differ between the obese and nonobese cohorts (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.84-1.28; P =.73; I 2 = 92%; GRADE, very low quality). Obesity was associated with reduced mortality risk with both endovascular and open surgery, although a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events was only observed with open surgery. In addition, obese patients had an increased risk of surgical site infections. Obesity was not associated with major adverse limb events, endovascular access site complications, or perioperative complications. The GRADE quality of evidence was very low. The findings from the present review suggest a survival advantage for obese patients with peripheral arterial disease. Future studies could focus on prospectively investigating the effect of obesity on peripheral arterial disease outcomes. A nuanced evaluation of body mass index as a preoperative risk factor is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Road traffic injuries (RTIs) are considered a major public health problem worldwide. In Oman, high numbers of RTIs and RTI-related deaths are frequently registered. This study aimed to evaluate the distribution of trauma care facilities in Oman with regards to their proximity to RTI-prevalent areas. Methods: This descriptive pilot study analysed RTI data recorded in the national Royal Oman Police registry from January to December 2014. The distribution of trauma care facilities was analysed by calculating distances between areas of peak RTI incidence and the closest trauma centre using Google Earth and Google Maps software (Google Inc., Googleplex, Mountain View, California, USA). Results: A total of 32 trauma care facilities were identified. Four facilities (12.5%) were categorised as class V trauma centres. Of the facilities in Muscat, 42.9% were ranked as class IV or V. There were no class IV or V facilities in Musandam, Al-Wusta or Al-Buraimi. General surgery, orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery services were available in 68.8%, 59.3% and 12.5% of the centres, respectively. Emergency services were available in 75.0% of the facilities. Intensive care units were available in 11 facilities, with four located in Muscat. The mean distance between a RTI hotspot and the nearest trauma care facility was 34.7 km; however, the mean distance to the nearest class IV or V facility was 83.3 km. Conclusion: The distribution and quality of trauma care facilities in Oman needs modification. It is recommended that certain centres upgrade their levels of trauma care in order to reduce RTI-associated morbidity and mortality in Oman. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]