Search

Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with ventriculoatrial (VA) block can represent a diagnostic challenge. We present a case of SVT where His-His interval shortening was repeatedly observed during episodes of VA block. This novel observation is more diagnostically suggestive of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia, as opposed to orthodromic re-entry using a nodofascicular or nodoventricular pathway where a constant His-His is recorded during episodes of VA block. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Introduction: The decremental properties of the nodoventricular pathway (NVP) are uncertain. Methods and Results: During short RP supraventricular tachycardia, a His‐refractory premature ventricular contraction (PVC) consistently terminated the tachycardia without atrial capture immediately after the PVC. Whereas a slightly earlier PVC failed to reset the subsequent His but terminated the tachycardia without atrial capture one cycle later. Conclusion: These observations are diagnostic of slow‐fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with a bystander concealed‐NVP and can be explained by decremental properties in the NVP itself; greater prematurity of the PVC resulted in more decremental conduction over the NVP, causing the AVNRT termination one cycle later. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Identification of infrequent nonpulmonary vein trigger premature atrial contractions (PACs) is challenging. We hypothesized that pace mapping (PM) assessed by correlation scores calculated by an intracardiac pattern matching (ICPM) module was useful for locating PAC origins, and conducted a validation study to assess the accuracy of ICPM‐guided PM. Methods: Analyzed were 30 patients with atrial fibrillation. After pulmonary vein isolation, atrial pacing was performed at one or two of four sites on the anterior and posterior aspects of the left atrium (LA, n = 10/10), LA septum (n = 10), and lateral RA (n = 10), which was arbitrarily determined as PAC. The intracardiac activation obtained from each pacing was set as an ICPM reference consisting of six CS unipolar electrograms (CS group) or six CS unipolar electrograms and four RA electrograms (CS–RA group). Results: The PM was performed at 193 ± 107 sites for each reference pacing site. All reference pacing sites corresponded to sites where the maximal ICPM correlation score was obtained. Sites with a correlation score ≥98% were rarely obtained in the CS‐RA than CS group (33% vs. 55%, P =.04), but those ≥95% were similarly obtained between the two groups (93% vs. 88%, P =.71), and those ≥90% were obtained in all. The surface areas with correlation scores ≥98% (0[0,10] vs. 10[0,35] mm2, P =.02), ≥95% (10[10,30] vs. 50[10,180] mm2, P =.002) and ≥90% (60[30,100] vs. 170[100,560] mm2, P =.0002) were smaller in the CS‐RA than CS group. Conclusions: ICPM‐guided PM was useful for identifying the reference pacing sites. Combined use of RA and CS electrograms may improve the mapping quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the field of cardiac electrophysiology, there is a universal desire: the discovery of a flawless diagnostic maneuver for supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs). This is not merely a wish but a shared odyssey. To improve diagnostic accuracy and achieve sufficient sensitivity and specificity, numerous diagnostic maneuvers have been proposed. However, each has its limitations and prompts a search for new diagnostic techniques. This continuous cycle of discovery and refinement, which we titled "SVT Quest" is reviewed in chronological sequence. This adventure in diagnosing narrow QRS tachycardia unfolds in 3 steps: Step 1 involves differentiating atrial tachycardia from other SVTs based on the observations such as V‐A‐V or V‐A‐A‐V response, ΔAA interval, VA linking, the last entrainment sequence, and response to the atrial extrastimulus. Step 2 focuses on differentiating orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia from atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia based on the observations such as tachycardia reset upon the premature ventricular contraction during His refractoriness, uncorrected/corrected postpacing interval, differential ventricular entrainment, orthodromic His capture, transition zone analysis, and total pacing prematurity. Step 3 characterizes the concealed nodoventricular/nodofascicular pathway and His‐ventricular pathway‐related tachycardia based on observations such as V‐V‐A response, ΔatrioHis interval, and paradoxical reset phenomenon. There is no single diagnostic maneuver that fits all scenarios. Therefore, the ability to apply multiple maneuvers in a case allows the operator to accumulate evidence to make a likely diagnosis. Let's embark on this adventure! [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article present case study of a 52-year-old woman who had been previously diagnosed with type-A Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. Topics include the diagnostic assessment of a narrow QRS tachycardia; differential diagnosis between orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT); and the complexities in distinguishing a posteroseptal atrioventricular pathway from a rare nodoventricular pathway.

The article presents a case study of a 62-year-old female patient with irregular tachycardia. Topics discussed include the differential diagnoses of narrow QRS tachycardias such as atrial flutter and orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia, the results of the 12-lead electrocardiogram administered to the patient, and the clinical implications of regularly irregular tachycardia.

BackgroundThe impact of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) on all-cause mortality remains unknown.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine the association between VT recurrence after ablation and survival in patients with scar-related VT.MethodsAnalysis of 2061 patients with structural heart disease referred for catheter ablation of scar-related VT from 12 international centers was performed. Data on clinical and procedural variables, VT recurrence, and mortality were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate freedom from recurrent VT, transplant, and death. Cox proportional hazards frailty models were used to analyze the effect of risk factors on VT recurrence and mortality.ResultsOne-year freedom from VT recurrence was 70% (72% in ischemic and 68% in nonischemic cardiomyopathy). Fifty-seven patients (3%) underwent cardiac transplantation, and 216 (10%) died during follow-up. At 1 year, the estimated rate of transplant and/or mortality was 15% (same for ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy). Transplant-free survival was significantly higher in patients without VT recurrence than in those with recurrence (90% vs 71%, P

Background: This study aimed to establish a systematic method for diagnosing atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with a bystander concealed nodoventricular pathway (cNVP). Methods: We analyzed 13 cases of AVNRT with a bystander cNVP, 11 connected to the slow pathway (cNVP‐SP) and two to the fast pathway (cNVP‐FP), along with two cases of cNVP‐related orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT). Results: The diagnostic process was summarized in three steps. Step 1 was identification of the presence of an accessory pathway by resetting the tachycardia with delay (n = 9) and termination without atrial capture (n = 4) immediately after delivery of a His‐refractory premature ventricular contraction (PVC). Step 2 was exclusion of ORT by atrio‐His block during the tachycardia (n = 4), disappearance of the reset phenomenon after the early PVC (n = 7), or dissociation of His from the tachycardia during ventricular overdrive pacing (n = 1). Moreover, tachycardia reset/termination without the atrial capture (n = 2/2) 1 cycle after the His‐refractory PVC was specifically diagnostic. Exceptionally, the disappearance of the reset phenomenon was also observed in the two cNVP‐ORTs. Step 3 was verification of the AVN as the cNVP insertion site, evidenced by an atrial reset/block preceding the His reset/block in fast–slow AVNRT with a cNVP‐SP and slow–fast AVNRT with a cNVP‐FP or His reset preceding the atrial reset in slow–fast AVNRT with a cNVP‐SP. Conclusion: AVNRT with a bystander cNVP can be diagnosed in the three steps with few exceptions. Notably, tachycardia reset/termination without atrial capture one cycle after delivery of a His‐refractory PVC is specifically diagnostic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The effects of the patient's disease awareness on the management of postablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) are unknown. Methods: One hundred thirty‐three AF patients undergoing an initial ablation were given a disease awareness questionnaire with a score of 16 points (8 points about AF in general and 8 points about oral anticoagulants) for the Jessa Atrial Fibrillation Knowledge Questionnaire (JAKQ) before and 1‐year‐after ablation. We divided them into the poor disease awareness group and good disease awareness group according to the median value (75%) of the total JAKQ score about AF in general, and compared the baseline patient characteristics and the 1‐year changes in the JAKQ score, medication adherence, blood pressure, laboratory data, echocardiographic parameters, and AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence rate between the two groups. Results: Forty‐two (31.6%) patients were classified as having poor disease awareness (<75% of the total JAKQ score), which was closely associated with poor medication adherence, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and greater left atrial volume (LAV). These trends in the poor disease awareness group remained unchanged 1 year after the ablation. During the 25.3‐month follow‐up, the AF/AT recurrence rate was significantly higher in the poor disease awareness than the good disease awareness group (23.8% vs. 7.7%; p =.003 by the log‐rank test). Conclusions: Poor disease awareness was linked to poor medication adherence, lifestyle‐related diseases, and greater LAV before and even 1 year after the ablation, making it a potential surrogate marker for AF/AT recurrence. These findings highlight the clinical significance of disease awareness in AF management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: High‐power short‐duration (HPSD) ablation at 50 W, guided by ablation index (AI) or lesion size index (LSI), and a 90 W/4 s very HSPD (vHPSD) setting are available for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment. Yet, tissue temperatures during ablation with different catheters around venoatrial junction and collateral tissues remain unclear. Methods: In this porcine study, we surgically implanted thermocouples on the epicardium near the superior vena cava (SVC), right pulmonary vein, and esophagus close to the inferior vena cava. We then compared tissue temperatures during 50W‐HPSD guided by AI 400 or LSI 5.0, and 90 W/4 s‐vHPSD ablation using THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH SF (STSF), TactiCath ablation catheter, sensor enabled (TacthCath), and QDOT MICRO (Qmode and Qmode+ settings) catheters. Results: STSF produced the highest maximum tissue temperature (Tmax), followed by TactiCath, and QDOT MICRO in Qmode and Qmode+ (62.7 ± 12.5°C, 58.0 ± 10.1°C, 50.0 ± 12.1°C, and 49.2 ± 8.4°C, respectively; p =.005), achieving effective transmural lesions. Time to lethal tissue temperature ≥50°C (t−T ≥ 50°C) was fastest in Qmode+, followed by TacthCath, STSF, and Qmode (4.3 ± 2.5, 6.4 ± 1.9, 7.1 ± 2.8, and 7.7 ± 3.1 s, respectively; p <.001). The catheter tip‐to‐thermocouple distance for lethal temperature (indicating lesion depth) from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was deepest in STSF at 5.2 mm, followed by Qmode at 4.3 mm, Qmode+ at 3.1 mm, and TactiCath at 2.8 mm. Ablation at the SVC near the phrenic nerve led to sudden injury at t−T ≥ 50°C in all four settings. The esophageal adventitia injury was least deep with Qmode+ ablation (0.4 ± 0.1 vs. 0.8 ± 0.4 mm for Qmode, 0.9 ± 0.3 mm for TactiCath, and 1.1 ± 0.5 mm for STSF, respectively; p =.005), correlating with Tmax. Conclusion: This study revealed distinct tissue temperature patterns during HSPD and vHPSD ablations with the three catheters, affecting lesion effectiveness and collateral damage based on Tmax and/or t−T ≥ 50°C. These findings provide key insights into the safety and efficacy of AF ablation with these four settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]